fedora-wiki-list?

[Karsten 'quaid' Wade]

On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 12:26 +0000, Paul W. Frields wrote:

> Is the a reason we don't want to claim this on f-docs-l once and for
> all?  I mean, it's not like our traffic here is overwhelming now.  We
> could simply say, "All wiki discussion --> f-docs-l," and ask people not
> to cross-post that material.

The example from Nigel was, "Do packagers and translators really want to
read about using prompts in example commands?"

I think the f-docs-l topic range is much wider than a wiki-specific
list.

I've kind-of felt the similar situation to what Nigel describes, not
knowing where to go _and_ invite people as a definitive wiki discussion
place that is not otherwise project specific.

The fact we use the wiki as a documentation writing tool is sort-of
coincidental.  Another project could write all their docs in the Trac
wiki, and if enough people cared, they might want a fedora-trac-list to
talk about how to use Trac more effectively, etc.

Part of this is that we have always made a separation of "requirements
when writing for Fedora Docs" and "how to use the wiki as an effective
writing tool".  I still think that is a good separation. :)

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, Community Gardener
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20081008/b1b03ad7/attachment.sig>