mwlib and odfpy
Toshio Kuratomi
a.badger at gmail.com
Mon Apr 20 23:00:53 UTC 2009
Ian Weller wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 07:20:55AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> Ian Weller wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 11:43:32AM -0400, Matthew Daniels wrote:
>>>> odfpy07 is packaged, but hasn't been reviewed/accepted. It has a review
>>>> request on bugzilla, but that's about the extent of it. I was under the
>>>> impression that we didn't even need it anymore because the newer mwlib
>>>> would be able to handle the newer odfpy.
>>>>
>>> That's not true anymore, unfortunately.
>>>
>> What's needed? Does it need porting to odfpy-0.9, was the previous patch
>> rejected upstream, or something else?
>>
> Previous patch was rejected because of another problem that arose.
> http://code.pediapress.com/wiki/ticket/567
>
New patch attached to our bugzilla which fixes that problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486678
ianweller will kick it upstream.
Note that I don't have data to test mw-render. If someone else does,
that would cut down on the round-trip time to send these to upstream and
back.
-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20090420/b0cd35df/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-docs-list
mailing list