mwlib and odfpy

Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com
Mon Apr 20 23:00:53 UTC 2009


Ian Weller wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 07:20:55AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> Ian Weller wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 11:43:32AM -0400, Matthew Daniels wrote:
>>>> odfpy07 is packaged, but hasn't been reviewed/accepted.  It has a review 
>>>> request on bugzilla, but that's about the extent of it.  I was under the 
>>>> impression that we didn't even need it anymore because the newer mwlib 
>>>> would be able to handle the newer odfpy.
>>>>
>>> That's not true anymore, unfortunately.
>>>
>> What's needed?  Does it need porting to odfpy-0.9, was the previous patch
>> rejected upstream, or something else?
>>
> Previous patch was rejected because of another problem that arose.
>   http://code.pediapress.com/wiki/ticket/567
> 
New patch attached to our bugzilla which fixes that problem:
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486678

ianweller will kick it upstream.

Note that I don't have data to test mw-render.  If someone else does,
that would cut down on the round-trip time to send these to upstream and
back.

-Toshio


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20090420/b0cd35df/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-docs-list mailing list