CMS + Fedora Magazine

[Karsten Wade]

On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 11:41:32PM -0700, Clint Savage wrote:
> 
> They are not required, but are a really good idea.  It provides
> logical separation when thinking about what a particular application
> (in this case CMS) does.  If we keep the same subdomain for all the
> structures, we'd logically separate on uri's.  Seems more logical to
> me to have it be domains/subdomains as the logical divide.

The key for me is consistency.  Fedora Infrastructure and Websites
teams decided on a sub-domain model some time ago.  I think the real
confusion is when it's a mix of sub-domain and nested folder
structures.

For this reason perhaps we should look at propagating
wiki.fedoraproject.org instead -- as part of rebirthing it as a
destination for contributors and other participants to be putting
Fedora content.

FWIW, the unique domain names are the ones that get me the most.  I am
always trying to ssh in to fedoraproject.org instead of
fedorapeople.org, and recently I got crossed by separate mailman
instances (is this true?) for lists.fedorahosted.org and
lists.fedoraproject.org.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener
http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20090206/d3e2b57a/attachment.sig>