[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: PATCH[1/1] Linux Security Guide



Fixed. And yes, I now have a signature.

-- 
Best regards,
Magnus 'magnusg' Glantz
E-mail: mg hacka net
GPG Key: 0DB53317

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Magnusg

tis 2009-01-06 klockan 18:18 +0100 skrev Magnus Glantz:
> Just to clarify. I think it's an acceptable challenge to do that. As the
> benefits from having re-usable documents for all skill-sets would be
> pretty neat.
> 
> I've worked with demand management on technical documentation to fit
> most skill-sets and I know it's possible to create documentation guiding
> almost anyone thru anything. It's just damn hard work :-)
> //M
> 
> tis 2009-01-06 klockan 18:01 +0100 skrev Magnus Glantz:
> > OK. So..
> > 
> > 1) Finishing the Security Guide, including all aspects of security
> > important for average desktop/system admin/paranoid-for-good-reason
> > professional.
> > 2) Compile guides focused on specific areas out of the Security Guide.
> > 
> > This may reflect how much I know of DocBook XML content re-use.
> > But.. I'm thinking there is one concern with this.
> > 
> > It seems to put tough
> > easy-to-read-and-understand-for-all-knowledge-levels demands on the
> > Security Guide. I'm thinking this may also be challenging for demands on
> > prerequisite knowledge. The level of prerequisite knowledge also needs
> > to be low. Else it might get complicated to re-use components from the
> > Security Guide when the audience is people that doesn't know or care
> > much about security.
> > 
> > //M
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > Message: 1
> > > Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 00:06:02 -0800
> > > From: Karsten Wade <kwade redhat com>
> > > Subject: Re: PATCH[1/1] Linux Security Guide
> > > To: fedora-docs-list redhat com
> > > Message-ID: <20090106080602 GJ8094 calliope phig org>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:24:36PM -0500, Eric Christensen wrote:
> > > 
> > > > If we are missing something you think should be addressed please feel
> > > > free to develop a chapter.
> > > 
> > > When Eric discussed the scope of the Security Guide with us on IRC,
> > > this was before the Red Hat content was released and available as an
> > > upstream to draw from.
> > > 
> > > However, we agreed then and later that it was a good idea to ...
> > > 
> > > * Include a wide range of security needs in the 'Security Guide'
> > > 
> > > * Make sure it was applicable to the "average desktop user", the
> > >   "average system administrator", and the "average highly secure
> > >   environment paranoid-for-good-reason professional."
> > > 
> > > (Eric, is that a fair assessment of the scope?)
> > > 
> > > That is a challenge, but a good one.
> > > 
> > > We can always take the larger upstream content and draw more than one
> > > Fedora-focused guide from it, for example ...
> > > 
> > > * Fedora Home User Security Guide
> > > * Fedora Secure Datacenter Guide
> > > * Etc.
> > > 
> > > By putting all the content in to one upstream document, it is like the
> > > Linux kernel -- useful for many sizes of hardware and environments.
> > > 
> > > Fortunately, DocBook XML makes it relatively easy to construct new
> > > guides out of existing XML content by reorganizing and omitting.
> > > 
> > > - Karsten
> > > -- 
> > > Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener
> > > http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
> > > AD0E0C41
> > > -------------- next part --------------
> > > A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > > Name: not available
> > > Type: application/pgp-signature
> > > Size: 189 bytes
> > > Desc: not available
> > > Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20090106/847e3b22/attachment.bin
> > > 
> > > ------------------------------
> > 


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]