[FW: Re: what requires fedora-release-notes]

Paul W. Frields stickster at gmail.com
Wed Jan 28 18:51:33 UTC 2009


This just in from fedora-devel-list[1]:

----- Forwarded message from Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com> -----

From: Jesse Keating <jkeating at redhat.com>
To: fedora-devel-list at redhat.com
Organization: Red Hat
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:03:06 -0800
Subject: Re: what requires fedora-release-notes
X-BeenThere: fedora-devel-list at redhat.com

On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 19:02 +0100, Daniel Mach wrote:
>  
> Jesse, is there any important data in this package which needs to be 
> shipped in Fedora at any cost?
> I can imagine some legal or licensing information about Fedora.

I don't believe so.

----- End forwarded message -----

[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-January/msg01967.html

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20090128/fbb748fb/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-docs-list mailing list