Rampoing up for F11

[Eric Christensen]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

John J. McDonough wrote:
> 1) First, obviously, it is really time?
Yes, it's time to get rolling on F11.

> 2) Paul mentioned an update release of F10 Release Notes.  Should we be
> planning that?  Did it sneak by me?  Are we going to pass on it this time?
Maybe.  I missed that comment.  I'm not sure when we would do an update.
 I think we should be concentrating on getting F11 ready to go but if we
have anything to update F10's notes then lets do it.

> 3) In some places (especially Devel Tools) we had lots of transclusions
> which gave Paul all kind of fits.  For F11, many of those fragments
> don't even look like they will be needed.  As we flatten the files,
> should we just rename the old entries to, for example,
> Archive:Docs/Beats/Devel/Tools/Emacs
I thought I flattened all the files (might not have changed the links in
the table).  If you don't need it just throw it in Archive:.

> 4) I gather alpha RNs are really only major, major changes.  I see
> few/none of those on my beats, BUT, there are some changes that are a
> really big deal to those affected.  How should we make those calls?
Go with your gut.  When in doubt write them up.  We can edit them out in
the end product if necessary but I'd rather have to cut stuff rather
than not have it.

> 
> Hey, nobody said it would be easy.
As I'm finding out as well.  I think Ryan will be a big help in this
area, though.
> 
> --McD
> 
- -- Eric
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmBAtoACgkQfQTSQL0MFMHMQACdHc+d4CnWPfWhf6eSNB2Zfav2
QAYAoNBaX01UJFMyuKRsW0IfyGgQGdXY
=gAc9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----