python-mwlib + odfpy is a mess.
david.nalley at fedoraproject.org
Wed Jul 8 05:33:13 UTC 2009
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Ian Weller<ian at ianweller.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 07:50:52PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>> I put up a simple test page here:
> Thanks :)
> Thanks also to Dave Nalley volunteered to commandeer the effort to fix
> this crapola I created (whee!) so I'll double check that he read this (I
> assume so).
>> Good news and bad news:
>> * Upstream mwlib is really chugging along. That's healthy.
>> * Current mwlib is now at 0.11.2, which is way ahead of our anemic
>> 0.9.10. It now requires odfpy==0.9.
>> * odfpy-0.9 shouldn't be too hard to do, right? I think mwlib is the
>> only thing using it.
> Correct AFAIK...
>> * Oh wait, did I mention there's more? mwlib-0.11.2 also needs
>> python-lockfile>=0.8 and python-timelib>=0.2, neither of which we
>> have yet, meaning more packaging.
> Oh did I mention there's some dependency epic fail going on in EL-5? I
> don't know what to do about it, nor do I remember what it is, but it has
> something to do with a Python library being an older version that what
> we need and the maintainer isn't willing to update because it would
> break previous code. I'm thinking of dropping EPEL for both of these
> packages (it was odfpy that was the culprit when I was updating it to
> Ian Weller <ian at ianweller.org>
> GnuPG fingerprint: E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226 B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36
> fedora-docs-list mailing list
> fedora-docs-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
Yes I have been reading and started looking at this tonight. Hopefully
will have a bit more time tomorrow to dedicate to it.
More information about the fedora-docs-list