Wikipedia license change

Karsten Wade kwade at redhat.com
Thu May 28 00:47:06 UTC 2009


On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 05:17:06AM +0200, Zach Oglesby wrote:
> 
> Is the OPL used by very many people anymore anyway? Even the people that
> wrote it recomend using a CC license [1]. I am all for the move.
> 
> [1]: http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/329

Wow, that was a cogent argument.  I'd heard in passing of this
statement, and it's a bit shaming to see it's just a shade over two
years old.  'Bout time we caught up!

Seems like we have a consensus.  In the meeting we just assigned
these:

quaid => legal + content services + bug reports to the Publican Fedora
         package (when that happens)

ianweller=> will talk to Creative Commons and work with Jack + Fedora
	    Marketing

ke4qqq => will make/own the feature page

cheers - Karsten
-- 
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener
http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/attachments/20090527/781384f8/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-docs-list mailing list