HOWTO: Accessing re-organized Fedora Docs CVS

[Karsten Wade]

On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 18:11 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:

> I firmly believe that the commons stuff should just be a black-box to
> the contributor.  After all, shouldn't all peers be equal or are some
> peers more equal than others ;-?

In my finite wisdom I asked you to be our CVS administrator.  Now I can
safely defer to your wisdom.  Which seems wise to me.  Just don't ask
what "which" refers to, and we're safe.

Also, until the repository gets to be _huge_, retooling should we change
our minds won't be that big of a thing.

'Sides, you mainly convinced me.  I like the convenience of included
modules, but we'll live the other way, too.  Also, what you propose is
closest to the current status quo.  So be it.  IIABDFI.

Carry on.

Other than the (minor) changes I made, is there anything else?  If not,
you're welcome to another edit iteration against this list, or to make
up a final and kick it out of the nest.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
                       Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-dsco-list/attachments/20050510/ac07c257/attachment.sig>