Following convention

[Karsten Wade]

On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 09:37 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> This list should munge reply-to headers like all the other Fedora lists.
> Not doing so is a real PITA.  I personally like *not* munging them, but
> what I *hate* is having to remember that this list is an exception.
> Let's please follow the convention of all the other Fedora lists.

Actually, any lists that I have created do not munge the Reply-To:
header.  It's obvious where my sympathies lie.

That said, I make it a policy of going with the consensus.  If that is
the consensus here, I'll change it.

See, it's a problem when we let our better idea be consumed by a lesser
idea, just because it's the way that everyone else does it.  Is this a
silly line-in-the-sand to draw?  Curious of everyone's opinion.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
                       Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-dsco-list/attachments/20051114/f508ffa0/attachment.sig>