Meeting minutes - 16/09/2005

[Gavin Henry]

<quote who="Paul W. Frields">
> Reply to post from f-marketing-l:
>
> On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 15:07 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
>> On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 17:34 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>> >  if you keep that color
>> > you'll need to use it for another subproject.
>>
>> The Documentation Project might like to take that color, seeing as we
>> are otherwise unrepresented, and it's kind of pretty.
>>
>> However, we might want to pause and see what emotions are attached to
>> those colors and see that the colors fit.  Or is that too touchy-feely
>> for email?
>>
>> http://www.capstrat.com/development/fedora/fedoraLogo_14.jpg
>>
>> I like the red of "core4" for Core.  Having "project" and "foundation"
>> the same color makes sense, they are nearly synonymous.
>>
>> Extras will need a new color, or it will clash with Legacy green.  The
>> magenta might do best for Extras, as it's a "variation" on the red.
>> Sort-of within the same visual palette.
>>
>> What other colors do we have?  What happens when we "run out" of colors?
>> Should we have some scheme for picking colors within palettes?
>
> How about a charcoal-dark gray (black may be too pronounced) for Docs?
> That color would be reminiscent of black-on-white text and not a bad
> choice for FDP.

Good idea.

I've just read and looked at all the logos and stages to get to where they
are at:

http://www.capstrat.com/development/fedora/

Looking pretty cool I must say.

>
> --
> Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
>   gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
>  Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
> --
> fedora-dsco-list mailing list
> fedora-dsco-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-dsco-list
>