actions to OPL

[Karsten Wade]

On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 00:00 +0000, Stuart Ellis wrote:

> Sorry to keep harping on about communication, but there is a track
> record of stuff being done without enough communication, and causing
> unnecessary confusion, misunderstanding, and ill-feeling. I'd like to
> avoid all that, if it can be done.

You are right.

How are these steps now?

http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/Licensing/StepsToOPL

I am about to ask for a vetting from the Foundation board et al.  I want
their input on the FAQ -before- we make it widely known.

One reason we are doing this discussion on IRC with logs and first here
is to start the attention small, but grow it rapidly.  It's working so
far, I'm feeling almost ready to face the f-docs-l with this. :)

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
Content Services                          Fedora Documentation Project
http://www.redhat.com/docs   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-dsco-list/attachments/20060207/cf27ad19/attachment.sig>