rpms/opencdk/devel opencdk.spec,1.2,1.3

Matthias Saou thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net
Wed Feb 2 16:02:58 UTC 2005


Michael Schwendt wrote :

> Remember that the sudden first mass-rebuild of everything in CVS happened
> while cleanup of the imported packages was not complete. Many old
packages
> had a "devel" branch, but had not been rebuilt or updated since FC1 or
> older. With these exceptions:
> 
> 'uqm-content'
>    (release not touched, so common package is shared for all dists)

Hmmm, for me, this one should not escape the renaming just for that reason,
especially since there have been no FC3 packages from fedora.us, Fedora
Extras should IMHO introduce only new clean packages (not to mention that
two different released builds should never share the same N-E-V-R since
there are no guarantees that they will be identical, especially when coming
from two different build systems), and eventually keep it as-is from there
on for future Core releases as you want to do now.

> 'gnome-themes-extras'
>    (0.fdr.1 was imported after mass release-bump, good to bump it now)

OK.

> The other packages with 0.fdr.1.1 (or so) were last built for FC1 and
need
> investigation and are tracked since FC2Status page, when they failed to
> build for FC2. The FC3Status page contains a copy of the old FC2Status
> page.

So the proper fix would be to remove them from the built pre-Extras, then?
And either remove their devel branch or "blacklist" them so that they don't
get rebuilt until someone actually decides to fix them up...

Matthias

-- 
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux kernel 2.6.10-1.753_FC3
Load : 0.21 0.29 0.28




More information about the fedora-extras-commits mailing list