devel/gnugo gnugo.spec,1.6,1.7

[David Woodhouse]

On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 13:00 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>I don't buy that. ;) Obviously, the gnugo package built successfully many
>times before and not needed the "fix". We've seen packages in fedora.us QA
>which needed the fix for the reviewer, but not for the packager, and vice
>versa. And all of us used the same /sbin/install-info.

I can't reproduce the case where it _doesn't_ get created, either on ppc
or i386. So I can't determine how/why it happens. Just another way in
which autocrap/libtool make your builds non-deterministic; nothing to
see here.

I still think we should make people write proper deterministic Makefiles
so we can get reproducible builds. I suspect that idea isn't going to
fly though.

-- 
dwmw2