devel/foobillard foobillard.spec,1.3,1.4

[Warren Togami]

Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> 
> => Unless a package links statically and or plays tricks with include
> paths, there is a fairly high possibility for users (in an "unclean"
> build-environment) to be able to rebuild GL/GLU packages even if they
> have competing/proprietary libGL/GLU implementations installed.
> 
> As a side effect, this construct also teaches users to setup a "proper
> RHL/FH compliant" GL/GLU environment: It tries to enforce a "XFree/xorg-
> x11" build/devel-environment, while giving them the freedom to use
> proprietary/competing GL/GLU runtime environments.

Assuming this is the best way to ensure that, then please send a summary 
of this issue (action and rationale) to spot at redhat.com so he can add it 
to the packaging guidelines document.

Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com