rpms/gambas/devel gambas.spec,1.1,1.2

[David Woodhouse]

On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 16:41 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 09:50 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote:
> > BuildRequires:        zlib-devel, sqlite2-devel, libxml2-devel, libxslt-devel
> > +# Code is not 64 bit clean.
> > +ExcludeArch: x86_64
> > +# Code is not endian clean.
> > +ExcludeArch: ppc
> 
> I don't think we build many packages for ppc64, but wouldn't it be good
> to "ExcludeArch: ppc64" for both of these reasons despite that?

Or perhaps just veto the package on code quality grounds? We don't want
Extras to be a dumping ground for dross -- if the problems are so bad
that it _can't_ be made endian and wordsize-clean, then perhaps we
shouldn't be shipping it. And if it _can_ be fixed, we should fix it.

-- 
dwmw2