common tobuild,1.2152,1.2153

[Quentin Spencer]

seth vidal wrote:

>On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 10:23 -0500, Quentin Spencer wrote:
>  
>
>>seth vidal wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 10:57 -0400, Jean-Luc Fontaine wrote:
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Author: jfontain
>>>>
>>>>Update of /cvs/extras/common
>>>>In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31190
>>>>
>>>>Modified Files:
>>>>	tobuild 
>>>>Log Message:
>>>>request build of rpms/moomps/FC-3 moomps-5_2-1_fc3 for fc3
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Index: tobuild
>>>>===================================================================
>>>>RCS file: /cvs/extras/common/tobuild,v
>>>>retrieving revision 1.2152
>>>>retrieving revision 1.2153
>>>>diff -u -r1.2152 -r1.2153
>>>>--- tobuild	29 Jul 2005 13:26:31 -0000	1.2152
>>>>+++ tobuild	29 Jul 2005 14:57:25 -0000	1.2153
>>>>@@ -65,3 +65,4 @@
>>>>jfontain	rpms/moomps/FC-3	moomps-5_2-1_fc3	fc3
>>>>qspencer	rpms/cln/FC-4	cln-1_1_9-4_fc4	fc4
>>>>jrb	rpms/at-poke/devel	at-poke-0_2_2-1	devel
>>>>+jfontain	rpms/moomps/FC-3	moomps-5_2-1_fc3	fc3
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Please read your fedora-maintainers email. Unless you have a very good
>>>reason there shouldn't be any need to update this file anymore.
>>>
>>>please try the 'make plague' option for now so we can get the bugs
>>>worked out.
>>> 
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>Some of us aren't subscribed to that list. If this is important to 
>>people on fedora-extras, can someone please forward the appropriate 
>>messages?
>>
>>    
>>
>
>if you're a packager you should absolutely be on maintainers.
>  
>

OK, this keeps changing, and we need some official policies about what 
we're supposed to be subscribed to. Are there any? I'm happy to 
subscribe to yet another list that I didn't know existed if I'm supposed 
to, but I don't even see it on:
http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/communicate/

At one time someone said we need to be subscribed to at least extras and 
extras-commits, so that's what I've been reading for all these months. 
What is different about the maintainers list that justifies the need for 
yet another mailing list?

-Quentin