rpms/lft/devel lft.spec,1.6,1.7

[Dag Wieers]

On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Michael Schwendt wrote:

> On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 00:17:33 +0100 (CET), Dag Wieers wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Cristian Gafton wrote:
> > 
> > > Frankly I could not give a damn about the fact that we break Freshen - these
> > > things are fed through yum from a yum repository, so I really
> > > don't care that rpm -F might fail in some weird conditions.
> > > 
> > > Epoch: 0 is stupid, useless and moronic.
> > 
> > Where were you 2 years ago ? We needed you back then :)
> 
> Two years ago, explicit Epoch 0 made sense.
> 
> Nowadays, the supported versions of RPM no longer require it.

Explicit Epoch 0 never made sense, we never required it for anything, Red 
Hat never required it and JBJ admits he was misquoted on the subject.

But please do include your line of thought.

--   dag wieers,  dag at wieers.com,  http://dag.wieers.com/   --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]