rpms/gnome-keyring/devel gnome-keyring-2.20-link-against-pam.patch, NONE, 1.1 gnome-keyring.spec, 1.60, 1.61
Matthias Clasen (mclasen)
fedora-extras-commits at redhat.com
Tue Oct 9 16:20:10 UTC 2007
- Previous message (by thread): rpms/system-config-date/devel .cvsignore, 1.71, 1.72 sources, 1.75, 1.76 system-config-date.spec, 1.81, 1.82
- Next message (by thread): rpms/cups/devel cups-libieee1284.patch, NONE, 1.1 cups.spec, 1.365, 1.366
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Author: mclasen
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/gnome-keyring/devel
In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8587
Modified Files:
gnome-keyring.spec
Added Files:
gnome-keyring-2.20-link-against-pam.patch
Log Message:
Avoid undefined symbols
gnome-keyring-2.20-link-against-pam.patch:
--- NEW FILE gnome-keyring-2.20-link-against-pam.patch ---
diff -up gnome-keyring-2.20/configure.in.link-against-pam gnome-keyring-2.20/configure.in
--- gnome-keyring-2.20/configure.in.link-against-pam 2007-10-09 12:14:32.000000000 -0400
+++ gnome-keyring-2.20/configure.in 2007-10-09 12:15:15.000000000 -0400
@@ -243,6 +243,13 @@ if test "$enable_pam" != "no"; then
AC_CHECK_HEADER(security/pam_modules.h, have_pam=yes, have_pam=no)
if test "$enable_pam" = "yes" -a "$have_pam" = "no"; then
AC_MSG_ERROR(The PAM headers are missing)
+ elif test "$have_pam" = "yes"; then
+ old_LIBS=$LIBS
+ AC_CHECK_LIB(pam, pam_start, have_pam=yes, have_pam=no)
+ if test "$enable_pam" = "yes" -a "$have_pam" = "no"; then
+ AC_MSG_ERROR(The PAM library is missing)
+ fi
+ LIBS=$old_LIBS
fi
fi
diff -up gnome-keyring-2.20/pam/Makefile.am.link-against-pam gnome-keyring-2.20/pam/Makefile.am
--- gnome-keyring-2.20/pam/Makefile.am.link-against-pam 2007-10-09 12:14:45.000000000 -0400
+++ gnome-keyring-2.20/pam/Makefile.am 2007-10-09 12:14:56.000000000 -0400
@@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ pam_gnome_keyring_la_SOURCES = \
gkr-pam-stubs.c
pam_gnome_keyring_la_LIBADD = \
- $(top_builddir)/common/libgkr-module-common.la
+ $(top_builddir)/common/libgkr-module-common.la \
+ -lpam
pam_gnome_keyring_la_LDFLAGS = \
-module -avoid-version \
Index: gnome-keyring.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/gnome-keyring/devel/gnome-keyring.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.60
retrieving revision 1.61
diff -u -r1.60 -r1.61
--- gnome-keyring.spec 8 Oct 2007 07:30:19 -0000 1.60
+++ gnome-keyring.spec 9 Oct 2007 16:19:37 -0000 1.61
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Summary: A framework for managing user passwords and other secrets
Name: gnome-keyring
Version: 2.20
-Release: 5%{?dist}
+Release: 6%{?dist}
License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+
Group: System Environment/Libraries
Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-keyring/2.20/gnome-keyring-%{version}.tar.bz2
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
Patch2: gnome-keyring-2.20-no-unset-default.patch
Patch3: gnome-keyring-2.20-no_match.patch
Patch4: gnome-keyring-2.20-selinux-pam.patch
+Patch5: gnome-keyring-2.20-link-against-pam.patch
%description
gnome-keyring manages passwords and other types of secrets
@@ -67,6 +68,7 @@
%patch2 -p1 -b .no_unset_default
%patch3 -p0 -b .no_match
%patch4 -p1 -b .selinux_pam
+%patch5 -p1 -b .link-against-pam
%build
aclocal
@@ -113,6 +115,9 @@
%changelog
+* Tue Oct 9 2007 Matthias Clasen <mclasen at redhat.com> - 2.20-6
+- Avoid undefined symbols in the pam module
+
* Mon Oct 8 2007 Alexander Larsson <alexl at redhat.com> - 2.20-5
- Fixed minor issue with pam-selinux issue pointed out by stef
- Previous message (by thread): rpms/system-config-date/devel .cvsignore, 1.71, 1.72 sources, 1.75, 1.76 system-config-date.spec, 1.81, 1.82
- Next message (by thread): rpms/cups/devel cups-libieee1284.patch, NONE, 1.1 cups.spec, 1.365, 1.366
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the fedora-extras-commits
mailing list