rpms/java-1.6.0-openjdk/F-9 java-1.6.0-openjdk-jconsole.desktop, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk-policytool.desktop, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.18, 1.19 java-1.6.0-openjdk-makefile.patch, 1.2, 1.3 java-1.6.0-openjdk-optflags.patch, 1.6, 1.7 java-1.6.0-openjdk.spec, 1.23, 1.24 sources, 1.17, 1.18

[Thomas Fitzsimmons (fitzsim)]

Lillian Angel wrote:

> --- NEW FILE java-1.6.0-openjdk-jconsole.desktop ---
> [Desktop Entry]
> Name=Java Monitoring & Management Console
> Comment=Monitor and manage Java applications
> Exec=jconsole
> TryExec=jconsole
> Icon=java
> Terminal=false
> Type=Application
> StartupWMClass=sun-tools-jconsole-JConsole
> Categories=Development;Monitor;Java;
> Version=1.0
> 
> 
> --- NEW FILE java-1.6.0-openjdk-policytool.desktop ---
> [Desktop Entry]
> Name=Java Policy Tool
> Comment=Manage Java policy files
> Exec=policytool
> TryExec=policytool
> Icon=java
> Terminal=false
> Type=Application
> StartupWMClass=sun-security-tools-PolicyTool
> Categories=Development;Java;
> Version=1.0

These desktop files should go upstream in the IcedTea repository, and they 
should refer to "OpenJDK" not "Java".  The TryExec fields should be removed and 
Exec should be hard-coded to point directly to the OpenJDK variant of the tool, 
since /usr/bin/{jconsole,policytool} are alternatives-managed.  Should these 
really be in the "Development" category?

Tom