rpms/java-1.6.0-openjdk/F-9 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc-ptracefix.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc-trapsfix.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc64-INSTALL_ARCH_DIR.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc64-linux.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk.spec, 1.46, 1.47

[Thomas Fitzsimmons (fitzsim)]

Hi Tom,

Tom Callaway wrote:
> Author: spot
> 
> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/java-1.6.0-openjdk/F-9
> In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8037
> 
> Modified Files:
> 	java-1.6.0-openjdk.spec 
> Added Files:
> 	java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc-ptracefix.patch 
> 	java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc-trapsfix.patch 
> 	java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc64-INSTALL_ARCH_DIR.patch 
> 	java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc64-linux.patch 
> Log Message:
> enable sparc/sparc64 builds

Please submit significant patches like this to Lillian and I for approval before 
committing them, along with an explanation.  I'd prefer to make this change in 
Rawhide unless there's a compelling need for it in Fedora 9.

This isn't the first time a cvsextras member has committed a non-trivial patch 
to the OpenJDK packages without asking.  This makes me second-guess my decision 
to facilitate trivial patches by allowing cvsextras members commit access. 
Maybe I misinterpreted the spirit of the "cvsextras group members can commit" 
flag.  I thought it was designed for checkin convenience, but that non-trivial 
patches were still commit-after-approval.  If not, I'll just uncheck the flag 
and manually commit OpenJDK patches after I've approved them.

Tom