rpms/kdebase-runtime/devel kdebase-runtime.spec,1.172,1.173
Kevin Kofler
kkofler at fedoraproject.org
Thu Dec 10 00:25:17 UTC 2009
- Previous message (by thread): rpms/yajl/F-12 lloyd-yajl-lib64.patch, NONE, 1.1 yajl.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Next message (by thread): rpms/libatasmart/devel libatasmart-uninitialized-var.patch, NONE, 1.1 libatasmart.spec, 1.21, 1.22
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Author: kkofler
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/kdebase-runtime/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32588/devel
Modified Files:
kdebase-runtime.spec
Log Message:
Add comment about the questionable decision to put KCMs into the main package (the issue was masked by the fact that they were being accidentally shipped in both the main package and -libs).
Index: kdebase-runtime.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/kdebase-runtime/devel/kdebase-runtime.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.172
retrieving revision 1.173
diff -u -p -r1.172 -r1.173
--- kdebase-runtime.spec 10 Dec 2009 00:23:13 -0000 1.172
+++ kdebase-runtime.spec 10 Dec 2009 00:25:17 -0000 1.173
@@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ fi
%{_kde4_libdir}/libkwalletbackend.so.*
%{_kde4_libdir}/libmolletnetwork.so.*
%{_kde4_libdir}/kde4/*.so
+# FIXME: Is this a good idea? Won't multilib apps need KCMs, too?
%exclude %{_kde4_libdir}/kde4/kcm_*.so
%exclude %{_kde4_libdir}/kde4/kded_*.so
%{_kde4_libdir}/kde4/plugins/phonon_platform/
- Previous message (by thread): rpms/yajl/F-12 lloyd-yajl-lib64.patch, NONE, 1.1 yajl.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Next message (by thread): rpms/libatasmart/devel libatasmart-uninitialized-var.patch, NONE, 1.1 libatasmart.spec, 1.21, 1.22
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the fedora-extras-commits
mailing list