Review needed: notecase

[Toshio]

On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 19:16 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:52:23 -0400, Toshio wrote:
> 
> > 2) Old recommendation to not mix %patch with %patchN (ie: use Patch0:
> > notecase-.... %patch0 -p1  Instead of Patch: notecase-... %patch -p1)
> 
> What's the background for this recommendation?
> 
> What's an example for "problems" caused by mixing %patch with %patchN?
> 
Disclaimer: I didn't make this a prereq for approval, just noted it.
(Unlike #1 which could affect end-user's menus.)

It's on the wiki at: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/NewPackageProcess

There was some discussion on packaging-list about justification of which
this one stuck in my mind:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2005-
March/msg00045.html

-Toshio
-- 
_________________ Move to Mexico!  Learn to roll sushi! _________________
     t  o  s  h  i  o  @  t  i  k  i  -  l  o  u  n  g  e  .  c  o  m
                                                               GA->ME 1999
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050413/477b0f69/attachment.sig>