New Package Process
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
ivazquez at ivazquez.net
Wed Apr 27 03:39:27 UTC 2005
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 17:03 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> Before reading the many messages in this thread, I need to state this:
>
> NewPackageProcess was never meant to have a separate "sponsor" and
> "review" during the package adding process. Sponsor was to be referred
> to only for what is necessary to get a CVS account, and "review" is the
> process by which a package becomes approved.
So then what's necessary to get a package into CVS? Other than a CVS
account, of course.
> This process however we are trying to replace with the database driven
> process, but that keeps getting held back due to being too busy with
> other things. I personally will have time to design it probably later
> this week after FC4test3 is frozen.
If you want/need any help then feel free to ask. I have years of
experience architecting/writing database-oriented apps.
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/
gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050426/fd347822/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list