ulog not on ppc?

[David Woodhouse]

On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 16:11 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Perhaps -- but since most packagers don't specify an arch to build when
> > it's to be built for all arches, I figured it was best to ask rather
> > than just change it.
> 
> That's misinterpretation. So far, most packagers have had to
> specify "(i386, x86_64)" explicitly. It's a recent change that no arch
> in brackets means to build for all archs.

Ah, OK. I hadn't been paying much attention to the wiki because I've
just been doing my own builds for FC3 before now. Upon looking, I saw it
documented that you should only list architectures if you wanted to
limit the build, and there was only one package which did so...

-- 
dwmw2