New Package Process (was: Re: Review Request: inadyn)

[Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams]

On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 13:53 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:40:50 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> 
> > It doesn't say in the wiki that the sponsor and the reviewer have to be
> > the same person. If this should be so then it might be prudent to spell
> > it out.
> 
> What does it mean "to be a package sponsor"? What are a package
> sponsor's obligations?

I think that the two paragraphs you wrote covers it quite well. The
important question is what sort of timespan should be allowed for other
contributors to chime in. One week? 2 weeks? One month? People have
lives outside of Fedora Extras (supposedly), and so can't always respond
to the initial commits promptly.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050426/24d20c39/attachment.sig>