D1x license
Greg DeKoenigsberg
gdk at redhat.com
Fri Apr 29 16:10:32 UTC 2005
Thanks for this discussion. It gives me more useful context for my
conversation next Monday with counsel.
--g
_____________________ ____________________________________________
Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent. the
Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the
] [ dumb. --mcluhan
Red Hat Summit ] [
New Orleans ] [ Learn. Network. Experience Open Source.
June 1/2/3 2005 ] [ (And Make Your Boss Pay For It.)
[ http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/
On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 09:55:19AM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> > A LOT of scientific and mathematical code is licensed as "Free for
> > non-commercial use". If we can't include it in FE, I'd understand. I'll
> > just have to email a lot of maintainers to beg for a license change.
>
> Yeah, I know it's a pretty common restriction. But, if we want to move more
> of Core to Extras (and I think pretty much everyone agrees we do), and make
> Extras easily selected from anaconda, Extras effectively become part of the
> basic distribution that vendors might want to actually provide. And having a
> single package in Extras with this restriction would then basically restrict
> all of Fedora.
>
> --
> Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/>
> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
> Current office temperature: 74 degrees Fahrenheit.
>
> --
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
>
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list