Build system bug?
Quentin Spencer
qspencer at ieee.org
Tue Aug 2 22:05:46 UTC 2005
Ed Hill wrote:
>On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 16:19 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
>
>
>>On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 15:08 -0500, Quentin Spencer wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I just got a build failure trying to build octave-forge:
>>>http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs//development/329-octave-forge-2005.06.13-2.fc5/
>>>
>>>Two of the build dependencies were just barely built in the system, and
>>>it appears that when it tried to import those two packages into the
>>>build environment, it tried to take them from x86_64 instead of i386,
>>>causing it to fail. I'll try again after the other packages are
>>>released, but I thought I'd at least report this. I can file a bug, but
>>>I don't know whether this is a problem with mock or the build system.
>>>
>>>
>>it's a little bit of a problem with both but I think it's mostly a
>>config problem.
>>
>>Jeremy,
>> Once you remove the /etc/rpm/platform files could you email this list
>>and tell Quentin to resubmit Octave-forge?
>>
>>let's see if that dtrt.
>>
>>
>
>I had exactly the same problem -- a build of opendap succeeded so I
>submitted a build request for nco and it failed with an error that
>indicated that it tried to pull in the opendap x86_64 packages for the
>i386 nco build.
>
>So I re-submitted the nco build request and it worked -- thanks!
>
>
This problem appears to be fixed for me now, too. However, I just looked
at the build system and noticed that PPC builds seem to be hung up.
There are 3 packages that are listed as "building" that have finished on
*86, but have not started on PPC.
-Quentin
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list