Splitting automated mail from human mail?

Kevin Cole kjcole at gri.gallaudet.edu
Tue Aug 9 20:50:03 UTC 2005


On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 04:39:22PM -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 04:40:53PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:
> | On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 13:35 -0700, Chip Turner wrote:
> | > Anyone else think maybe the high flow of bugzilla and build mails
> | > would be better on a separate list, so that discussion, approvals, etc
> | > take place in a quieter, more filterable venue?  Or is it just me? :)
> 
> It seems to me that utilizing the 'Users to watch' feature of bugzilla
> would be a good solution to monitor extras bug activity, but watching
> all of Greg DeKoenigsberg's bugs is probably not a good idea.  Maybe
> have these bugs get assigned to some sort of fedora-extras@ alias of
> some sort ?

One could mung mailman or postfix and have it insert a special header
like "X-circular-file: True", for messages from bugzilla perhaps?  (Or
am I displaying my ignorance again?)

-- 
 Kevin Cole                    |  Key ID: 0xE6F332C7
 Gallaudet University          |     WWW: http://gri.gallaudet.edu/~kjcole/
 Hall Memorial Bldg  S-419     |   V/TTY: (202) 651-5135
 Washington, D.C.  20002-3695  |     FAX: (202) 651-5746

 "Using vi is not a sin. It's a penance." -- St. IGNUcious, Church of Emacs
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050809/947a513a/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list