Splitting automated mail from human mail?

Chip Turner chip.turner at gmail.com
Tue Aug 9 21:21:03 UTC 2005


Bugzilla is great for process and automation and workflow, but it is
lousy for actually discussing things, especially as a group.  If two
or three people are discussing something, mailing lists seem fine to
me.  Bugzilla is great to make sure requests don't fall off and get
left behind, but it shouldn't, IMO, be the actual medium of
collaboration.

Chip

On 8/9/05, Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> If things are working as they should be working, then these bugzilla
> emails should contain actual discussion.
> 
> Of course, looks like we're getting some other action:
> 
> a. Multiple emails per bug.  This could be because users are commenting,
> and then changing the state of the bug in a separate action.
> 
> b. Emails for state change of tracker bugs.  These we should get rid of
> entirely.
> 
> My concern is this: if we send these emails to a separate list, will
> potential reviewers follow that new list?
> 
> --g
> 
> _____________________  ____________________________________________
>   Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
>  Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent.  the
>              Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the
>                      ] [ dumb.  --mcluhan
> 
> On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Luke Macken wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 04:40:53PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:
> > | On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 13:35 -0700, Chip Turner wrote:
> > | > Anyone else think maybe the high flow of bugzilla and build mails
> > | > would be better on a separate list, so that discussion, approvals, etc
> > | > take place in a quieter, more filterable venue?  Or is it just me? :)
> > |
> > | +1
> >
> > +1
> >
> > It seems to me that utilizing the 'Users to watch' feature of bugzilla
> > would be a good solution to monitor extras bug activity, but watching
> > all of Greg DeKoenigsberg's bugs is probably not a good idea.  Maybe
> > have these bugs get assigned to some sort of fedora-extras@ alias of
> > some sort ?
> >
> > luke
> >
> > --
> > fedora-extras-list mailing list
> > fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
> >
> 
> --
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
> 


-- 
Chip Turner                   chip.turner at gmail.com




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list