[Bug 166251] Review Request: perl-Apache-LogRegex

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Apache-LogRegex


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166251





------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org  2005-08-19 10:43 EST -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> The perldoc trick is indeed a very useful one.  Thanks!  Two nitpicks, though:  
>   
> The -T option seems more appropriate than -t even though it doesn't seem to  
> matter when the output is directed to a file.

It makes a difference here: "perldoc -T perlgpl > file" results in a file with
old-fashioned highlighting (visible in vim) such as:

N^HNA^HAM^HME^HE
       perlgpl - the GNU General Public License, version 2

This doesn't happen with -t
 
> Second, I'd suggest using the "standard" filenames of "COPYING" for the GPL 
> and "Artistic" for the Artistic License.  IIRC a statement like "see the file 
> COPYING" was included in some revisions of the GPL, in the blurb that it 
> suggests adding to source files. 

Agreed.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.