[Bug 166377] Review Request: erlang - General-purpose programming language and runtime environment

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: erlang - General-purpose programming language and runtime environment


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166377


triad at df.lth.se changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |triad at df.lth.se




------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se  2005-08-22 09:53 EST -------
OK there is one odd thing to be spotted here immediately. The version
is "R10B" which I know for sure is Ericsson-internal revision numbering.
Have you made sure that this will work with RPM upgrades? Is it really OK
for the revision to start with a letter?

The number scheme means next release in R10 will be R10C through R10Z, but then
the real trouble starts, because after that R10AA will follow (I believe)
and that might not work so well with RPM, I believe it will be considered
a lesser version than R10Z... Of course if the revision policy is such that
Erlang will never pass beyond R10Z it will be OK, if and only if the "R" first
in the revision number is OK, as stated in the previous remark.

Please test and clarify this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.