[Bug 166800] Review Request: sbcl-0.9.4-1: The Steel Bank Common Lisp development environment

Mon Aug 29 14:02:27 UTC 2005

On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 09:43 -0400, bugzilla at redhat.com wrote:

> gemi at bluewin.ch changed:

> * Shouldn't the src rpm contain bootstrapping binaries for all architectures?
>   AFAIK src rpms are not architecture dependent.
Actually, src.rpms are architecture dependent:

Just check the %ARCH inside of FE src.rpms:
rpm -q --qf "%{ARCH}\n" -p <package>.src.rpm

It's only that in most cases, they are usable independent of the
architecture an src.rpm had been build. 

However, intentionally constructing architecture dependent src.rpms is
pretty simple: Add some %ifarch conditionals around "SourceX" or
"PatchX" in an rpm-spec and you'll get a real architecture dependent
src.rpm.

Ralf