APPROVED Re: Request for review: koffice

[Andreas Bierfert]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Warren Togami wrote:
> Please test for proper directory ownership as these packages are
> installed in dependency order.  Test it using a similar procedure to this:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=136030#c21

I will do this asap. If there need to be changes I will commit them. For now I
checked in my current version.

> My only thought is perhaps the langpacks should not require an exact
> matching %{release}.  By requiring only a matching %{version}, then you
> can independently patch either package without necessitating a zero
> change rebuild of the other.  New langpacks are released with every new
> version right?

Done. Imported to cvs.

> After this change to Requires, I suspect your koffice is ready so
> APPROVED.  If we find any further problems we can always rebuild.

Please take a last quick look if you want. Otherwise I will request branch
creation for FC-4 and build.


Thx again for your time.

- - Andreas
- --
Andreas Bierfert               | http://awbsworld.de      | GPG: C58CF1CB
andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de | http://lowlatency.de     | signed/encrypted
phone: +49 2402 102373         | cell: +49 172 9789968    | mail preferred
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFC7eJ5QEQyPsWM8csRAgnSAJ9XSLp0dvaxkXdqcmjJyRA1mVgeKgCeMcLb
v4Lm/OXjiH1sMDDZBIMuJG8=
=G5uE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----