opendap is far from being 64-bit clean
Ed Hill
ed at eh3.com
Wed Aug 3 18:17:12 UTC 2005
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 10:30 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 23:54 -0400, Ed Hill wrote:
>
> > 3) If the answer to (2) is "NO", then is it OK for me to remove
> > opendap as a BuildRequires for nco since it is, after all,
> > an optional feature?
>
> Sure. Go ahead and take out opendap as a BuildRequires. When I have time
> (likely sometime in late August), I'll sit down with my x86_64 and try
> to make it work.
Hi Tom,
Cool, I'm entirely happy with that!
And I'll be glad to help patch opendap so that it builds on x86_64 since
we intend to use it. A later-this-month time frame is also better for
me.
thanks,
Ed
--
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office: MIT Dept. of EAPS; Rm 54-1424; 77 Massachusetts Ave.
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
emails: eh3 at mit.edu ed at eh3.com
URLs: http://web.mit.edu/eh3/ http://eh3.com/
phone: 617-253-0098
fax: 617-253-4464
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list