opendap is far from being 64-bit clean

Ed Hill ed at eh3.com
Wed Aug 3 18:17:12 UTC 2005


On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 10:30 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 23:54 -0400, Ed Hill wrote:
> 
> >  3) If the answer to (2) is "NO", then is it OK for me to remove 
> >     opendap as a BuildRequires for nco since it is, after all, 
> >     an optional feature?
> 
> Sure. Go ahead and take out opendap as a BuildRequires. When I have time
> (likely sometime in late August), I'll sit down with my x86_64 and try
> to make it work.


Hi Tom,

Cool, I'm entirely happy with that!

And I'll be glad to help patch opendap so that it builds on x86_64 since
we intend to use it.  A later-this-month time frame is also better for
me.

thanks,
Ed

-- 
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office:  MIT Dept. of EAPS;  Rm 54-1424;  77 Massachusetts Ave.
             Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
emails:  eh3 at mit.edu                ed at eh3.com
URLs:    http://web.mit.edu/eh3/    http://eh3.com/
phone:   617-253-0098
fax:     617-253-4464




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list