Request for Review: bmp-flac2

[Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams]

On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 00:54 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net> wrote:
> > I'd prefer to see a version number that won't require an Epoch bump in
> > the future.
> 
> I am not sure I understand the problem.

The version number in the package, "003", is equivalent to "3" according
to rpm. Can you guarantee that there will never be a package with a
version less than 3?

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050803/0dc5d4d3/attachment.sig>