Request for review (round3): libxslt-plugin-regexp and libxslt-plugin-dates-and-time

[joel reed]

On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 04:41:33AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 01:53:48AM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > But anyways, fix what Tom and Brian have mentioned, *plus* you *still*
> > don't have ownership of %{_libdir}/libxslt. If you think that the
> > libxslt package should own it then file a bug. Until it does though, you
> > should.
> 
>   Hum, right. At the moment the libxslt package don't provide a placeholder
> for plugins. That should probably be added, my only minor point about just
>     %{_libdir}/libxslt
> is that it doesn't indicate it is for plugins or local packages. Maybe
>     %{_libdir}/libxslt/plugins or
>     %{_libdir}/libxslt-plugins
> I'm not sure what would be the best path/naming.

i like %{_libdir}/libxslt-plugins, but really either is fine. just
let me know what you decide!

jr

> 
> Daniel
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
> veillard at redhat.com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
> http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
> 
> --
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list