Re-request for review: glpk

[Quentin Spencer]

Ed Hill wrote:

>Heres the promised glpk review:
>
> needswork:
> - a devel package should not install binaries -- please 
>   put the binaries into a separate non-devel package
> - the package installs 19 headers in /usr/include and they 
>   should probably be put in a subdirectory such as 
>   /usr/include/glpk
> - please add an "rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}" immediately after 
>   the "%install" line
>  
>

OK, I've updated this package and put the SRPM in:
http://webpages.charter.net/qspencer/rpm/

I have moved the headers into /usr/include/glpk, and I was able to get 
octave to find them correctly. I put the two binaries into a separate 
package called glpk-utils (same thing that is done in ginac). Lastly, I 
fixed the missing command at the beginning of install.

-Quentin