[Bug 165254] Review Request: plplot - Scientific plotting package

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Aug 9 16:35:56 UTC 2005


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: plplot - Scientific plotting package


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165254





------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com  2005-08-09 12:35 EST -------
Okay, released -5 which cleans up a bunch of rpmlint issues and explicitly turns
off unused options with configure.  It also adds %check/make check and some
fixes to some problems that that turned up.

I still get the following rpmlint messages, but I'm going to ignore them:

W: plplot-gnome summary-not-capitalized plplot funtions for gnome
W: plplot-gnome no-documentation
W: plplot-tk summary-not-capitalized plplot funtions for tk
E: plplot-tk no-dependency-on locales-tk
W: plplot-gnome-devel summary-not-capitalized plplot libraries for gnome
W: plplot-gnome-devel no-documentation
W: plplot-octave summary-not-capitalized plplot funtions for octave
W: plplot-octave no-documentation
W: plplot-octave non-standard-dir-in-usr libexec
W: plplot-tk-devel summary-not-capitalized plplot libraries for tk
W: plplot-tk-devel no-documentation
E: plplot-tk-devel wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/plplot5.5.3/examples/tk/tk01 "xtk01"
E: plplot-tk-devel wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/plplot5.5.3/examples/tk/tk04 "xtk04"
E: plplot-tk-devel wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/plplot5.5.3/examples/tk/tk02 "xtk02"

The last 3 are spurious because the example sripts really do run with a
different interpreter.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list