Splitting automated mail from human mail?

[Greg DeKoenigsberg]

If things are working as they should be working, then these bugzilla 
emails should contain actual discussion.  

Of course, looks like we're getting some other action:

a. Multiple emails per bug.  This could be because users are commenting, 
and then changing the state of the bug in a separate action.

b. Emails for state change of tracker bugs.  These we should get rid of 
entirely.

My concern is this: if we send these emails to a separate list, will 
potential reviewers follow that new list?

--g

_____________________  ____________________________________________
  Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
 Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent.  the
             Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the 
                     ] [ dumb.  --mcluhan

On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Luke Macken wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 04:40:53PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:
> | On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 13:35 -0700, Chip Turner wrote:
> | > Anyone else think maybe the high flow of bugzilla and build mails
> | > would be better on a separate list, so that discussion, approvals, etc
> | > take place in a quieter, more filterable venue?  Or is it just me? :)
> | 
> | +1
> 
> +1
> 
> It seems to me that utilizing the 'Users to watch' feature of bugzilla
> would be a good solution to monitor extras bug activity, but watching
> all of Greg DeKoenigsberg's bugs is probably not a good idea.  Maybe
> have these bugs get assigned to some sort of fedora-extras@ alias of
> some sort ?
> 
> luke
> 
> --
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
>