[Bug 165900] Review Request: hunkyfonts

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: hunkyfonts


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165900





------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com  2005-08-14 07:11 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)

> Check the bitstream-vera-fonts spec in core and
> dejavu-fonts and mgopen-fonts spec in extras.

I based my spec file on bitstream-vera-fonts, urw-fonts and this informations:
http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/release-notes/fc4/errata/#sn-xwindows

> An explanation of the policy I could find is in
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-May/msg00887.html

Thanks for the link! I didn't know about it.

> So drop the requires and just check for the existence of fc-cache in %post and
> %postun.  Also, you only need to %ghost the fonts.cache-1 file, since the spec
> will not deal with xfs specifics.

Done.

> I wonder if it is allowed to distribute a derivative work of the bitstream
> fonts under LGPL.

I'm not a lawyer and I don't know the answer :/ May someone resolve this issue?

Updated files are in the same place (I haven't increased release number).

Thanks for the review :]

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.