[Bug 166254] Review Request: perl-Imager

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Imager


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166254





------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com  2005-08-18 23:20 EST -------
built on against a rawhide box, rpmlint perl-Imager-0.45-1.i386.rpm:
W: perl-Imager unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Imager/Imager.so

 ->Ignorable warning

E: perl-Imager wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/doc/perl-Imager-0.45/samples/anaglyph.pl "perl"
E: perl-Imager wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/doc/perl-Imager-0.45/samples/interleave.pl "perl"

  ->Can you patch the sample scripts in the samples directory to use
    #!/usr/bin/perl -w  instead of #!perl -w   and should they be executable?

E: perl-Imager wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/Imager/Font/Wrap.pm "perl"
E: perl-Imager non-executable-script
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi/Imager/Font/Wrap.pm 
0644

  ->Same issue. Wrap.pm is the only pm file in the Font subdirectory that has an  
    interpreter defined in the header. Either this needs to be corrected like 
    the sample scripts or the interpreter line should be removed. I'm not sure 
    which workaround is correct for Wrap.pm.  Is it meant to be run as a 
    stand-alone executable script?


-jef

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.