[Bug 166318] Review request: perl-Font-AFM - Font::AFM Perl module
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Aug 20 09:15:20 UTC 2005
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review request: perl-Font-AFM - Font::AFM Perl module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166318
ville.skytta at iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-08-20 05:15 EST -------
I checked freebsd and gentoo too, and they don't modify it either.
So it boils down to whether the default value in the unmodified AFM.pm is
useful on the majority of OS's; if not, applications using it will have to
take it into account anyway some way, and thus having a better default value
here won't help much. On the other hand, then it might be that instead of
having a better defaults here, there could be several applications using
Font::AFM that would need modification, which is probably even worse regarding
maintenance.
Also, the *.afm filenames seem to vary pretty much between the packages that
provide them, like the test suite here expecting to find Helvetica.afm, which
is shipped at least with the name Helvetica.afm in some OpenOffice's dirs,
phvr.afm in a2ps and hv.afm in enscript.
So, pick your poison, I don't see the default paths being a blocker, modified
or unmodified, so consider this approved. The test suite coverage and summary
improvement bits should be committed, though.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list