[Bug 166377] Review Request: erlang - General-purpose programming language and runtime environment

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Aug 22 16:35:55 UTC 2005


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: erlang - General-purpose programming language and runtime environment


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166377





------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch  2005-08-22 12:35 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> The number scheme means next release in R10 will be R10C through R10Z, but then
> the real trouble starts, because after that R10AA will follow (I believe)
> and that might not work so well with RPM, I believe it will be considered
> a lesser version than R10Z... Of course if the revision policy is such that
> Erlang will never pass beyond R10Z it will be OK, if and only if the "R" first
> in the revision number is OK, as stated in the previous remark.
You are right, this doesnt work, R10AA is before R10Z. I dont think releases
will reach past R10Z before R11. However maybe another version naming scheme
might be better. Any suggestions?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list