[Bug 166800] Review Request: sbcl-0.9.4-1: The Steel Bank Common Lisp development environment

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sbcl-0.9.4-1: The Steel Bank Common Lisp development environment


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166800


gemi at bluewin.ch changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                URL|http://apt.kde-             |http://apt.kde-
                   |redhat.org/apt/fedora/all/SR|redhat.org/apt/fedora/all/SR
                   |PMS.stable/sbcl-0.9.4-      |PMS/stable/sbcl-0.9.4-
                   |1.src.rpm                   |1.src.rpm




------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch  2005-08-29 09:43 EST -------
* The spec file should be named sbcl.spec
* Shouldn't the src rpm contain bootstrapping binaries for all architectures?
  AFAIK src rpms are not architecture dependent.
* You may request a ppc binary from upstream, so that all fedora platforms
  are supported.
* Requires(post): /sbin/install-info
  Requires(preun): /sbin/install-info
* setarch -R is required on FC4 to start sbcl, you might create a script
  /usr/bin/sbcl that calls a renamed /usr/bin/sbcl.bin with setarch.
  Better yet, communicate with upstream to investigate the problem.
* Have you tried clisp to bootstrap sbcl? I did not succeed. If you do, the
  binaries are not necessary.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.