[Bug 166800] Review Request: sbcl-0.9.4-1: The Steel Bank Common Lisp development environment

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sbcl-0.9.4-1: The Steel Bank Common Lisp development environment


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166800





------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch  2005-08-29 12:40 EST -------
But %{fedora} is not defined in fc4's rpmbuild, i.e., the src rpm may not build
correctly for a user.

output of rpmlint:
W: sbcl devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/sbcl/sb-bsd-sockets/alien/undefs.c
W: sbcl devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/sbcl/sb-bsd-sockets/foo.c
W: sbcl devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/sbcl/sb-bsd-sockets/alien/get-h-errno.c
E: sbcl script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/sbcl/sb-bsd-sockets/alien/get-h-errno.c

Are these files necessary?
At least chmod 644 get-h-errno.c

E: sbcl info-dir-file /usr/share/info/dir

this must be removed

W: sbcl devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/sbcl/sb-posix/alien/stat-macros.c
W: sbcl devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/sbcl/sb-posix/alien/waitpid-macros.c
W: sbcl devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/sbcl/sb-posix/foo.c

Are these necessary?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.