[Bug 167258] Review Request: up-imapproxy: University of Pennsylvania IMAP Proxy

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: up-imapproxy: University of Pennsylvania IMAP Proxy


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167258





------- Additional Comments From jeff at ultimateevil.org  2005-08-31 19:49 EST -------
Before this gets reviewed, I want to ask about rpmlint output:

W: up-imapproxy incoherent-version-in-changelog up-imapproxy-1.2.3-3 1.2.3-3

I don't understand this one.  This changelog is just like the last package I
submitted, which was fine.  Is it because of the additional '-' in the package name?

E: up-imapproxy init-script-without-chkconfig-postin /etc/rc.d/init.d/imapproxy

Um, I thought it was a bad idea to enable a service just because it is being
installed.

E: up-imapproxy no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/imapproxy

I didn't write the init script.  It is packaged in the source.  I could write
another one if it is required.

W: up-imapproxy no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/imapproxy

See above comment.

W: up-imapproxy service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/imapproxy

I don't know what this means.

E: up-imapproxy subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/imapproxy

I think I might know what this means, but I could be wrong.  However, again, I
didn't write the init script.

W: up-imapproxy incoherent-init-script-name imapproxy

Is this because the init script is "imapproxy" and the package is
"up-imapproxy?"  This seems rather trivial, especially since "up" just means
"University of Pennsylvania."  The source tarball is "up-imapproxy," the daemon
is "in.imapproxy," and the service is called "imapproxy."  I don't think this is
a significant issue.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.