From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 00:44:55 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:44:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173675] Review Request: xfce4-xmms-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512010044.jB10it4h005431@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-xmms-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173675 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-11-30 19:44 EST ------- - Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs. - Fix %defattr. New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-xmms-plugin-0.3.1-4.fc4.src.rpm SPEC still at http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SPECS/xfce4-xmms-plugin.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 01:09:50 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:09:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173544] Review Request: xfce4-genmon-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512010109.jB119ooP006978@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-genmon-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173544 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-11-30 20:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > nits: > - Might tell upstream that the spec they ship has the License as BSD, which is > wrong. just like in bug #173105, this is a relict from a xfce4-panel-sample-plugin package. > > needswork: > - source doesn't match upsteam. Looks like they recreated the tar in jan 2005, > but you have the older version from 2004. fixed. > - missing libxfcegui4-devel BuildRequires. fixed. (Thanks for kickin my ass ;)) Also fixed %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of (-,root,root) NEW SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-genmon-plugin-1.1-4.fc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 01:54:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:54:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173671] Review Request: xfce4-weather-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512010154.jB11sE4h011303@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-weather-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173671 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-11-30 20:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Hi, > > Using yum-builddep, I noticed there are missed packages for BuildRequires: > - libxfce4gui-devel Added > - libxfce4util-devel false positive, pulled automatically by xfcegui-devel. > - libxfce4mcs-devel I can't see where this depends on libxfce4mcs-devel: checking XFCE4_PANEL_CFLAGS... -DXTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DXUSE_MTSAFE_API -I/usr/include/xfce4 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/freetype2/config -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 checking XFCE4_PANEL_LIBS... -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lxfcegui4 -lxml2 -lpthread -lz -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lxfce4util -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 > > Also check out if there is a Requires for that plugin. Nope, AFAIK not. > > When it comes to BSD, could specify it is the original or the modified license. > I think other developers five a very good explaination to avoid confusion. This is the "New BSD License" from http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php New SRPM http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-weather-plugin-0.4.9-4.fc4.src.rpm Updated SPEC http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SPECS/xfce4-weather-plugin.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 02:08:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:08:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173672] Review Request: xfce4-windowlist-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512010208.jB128bv9012830@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-windowlist-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173672 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-11-30 21:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > NEEDSWORK > Similar problem from bug #173672. Of coure you mean bug #17671, this is #173672 > Make sure to use yum-builddep command to check out dependencies. Builddeps are fine now, builds in mock on Core 4 > Also include ... what? New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-windowlist-plugin-0.1.0-4.fc4.src.rpm Updated SPEC http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SPECS/xfce4-windowlist-plugin.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 02:14:55 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:14:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173670] Review Request: xfce4-wavelan-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512010214.jB12EtRX013361@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-wavelan-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173670 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-11-30 21:14 EST ------- - Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs. - Fix %defattr. New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-wavelan-plugin-0.4.1-4.fc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 02:26:22 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:26:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173669] Review Request: xfce4-taskbar-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512010226.jB12QMv6014211@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-taskbar-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173669 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-11-30 21:26 EST ------- - Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs. - Fix %defattr. New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-taskbar-plugin-0.2.2-4.fc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 02:33:17 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:33:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173667] Review Request: xfce4-showdesktop-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512010233.jB12XHjl014728@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-showdesktop-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173667 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-11-30 21:33 EST ------- - Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs. - Fix %defattr. New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-showdesktop-plugin-0.4.0-4.fc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 02:38:10 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:38:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173668] Review Request: xfce4-systemload-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512010238.jB12cAkT015180@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-systemload-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173668 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-11-30 21:37 EST ------- - Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs. - Fix %defattr. New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-systemload-plugin-0.3.6-4.fc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 02:40:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173661] Review Request: xfce4-fsguard-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512010240.jB12eSBH015465@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-fsguard-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173661 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-11-30 21:39 EST ------- - Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs. - Fix %defattr. New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-fsguard-plugin-0.2.1-2.fc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 02:48:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:48:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173660] Review Request: xfce4-diskperf-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512010248.jB12mT8C016304@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-diskperf-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173660 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-11-30 21:48 EST ------- - Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs. - Fix %defattr. New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-diskperf-plugin-1.5-3.fc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 02:48:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173657] Review Request: xfce4-clipman-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512010248.jB12mZam016320@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-clipman-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173657 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-11-30 21:48 EST ------- - Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs. - Fix %defattr. New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-clipman-plugin-0.4.1-3.fc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 02:49:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:49:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173660] Review Request: xfce4-diskperf-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512010249.jB12nQIJ016387@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-diskperf-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173660 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-11-30 21:49 EST ------- Sorry, SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-diskperf-plugin-1.5-4.fc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 02:50:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:50:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173657] Review Request: xfce4-clipman-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512010250.jB12oSZQ016476@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-clipman-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173657 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-11-30 21:50 EST ------- Sorry (once again) http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-clipman-plugin-0.4.1-4.fc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 02:52:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:52:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173653] Review Request: xfce4-quicklauncher-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512010252.jB12qIo2016644@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-quicklauncher-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173653 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-11-30 21:52 EST ------- - Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs. - Fix %defattr. New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-quicklauncher-plugin-0.81-2.fc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From dcbw at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 04:19:42 2005 From: dcbw at redhat.com (Dan Williams) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 23:19:42 -0500 Subject: Buildsys down? In-Reply-To: <438E1265.9000108@cora.nwra.com> References: <438E1265.9000108@cora.nwra.com> Message-ID: <1133410782.4201.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 13:58 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > /usr/bin/plague-client build hdf5 hdf5-1_6_4-5_fc4 fc4 > Package hdf5 enqueued. (However, no Job ID was provided in the time > required) > > Stats page shows waiting jobs and idle builders. Diagnosed the problem and it was hung in SSL code waiting for network data, even though socket timeouts are set. I've run some tests and I believe this is due to iptables rules on the builders, which I'm talking to Eliot and Jeremy about changing to fix this. Dan From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 05:31:36 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 00:31:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173544] Review Request: xfce4-genmon-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512010531.jB15VaTJ003138@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-genmon-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173544 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2005-12-01 00:31 EST ------- > just like in bug #173105, this is a relict from a xfce4-panel-sample-plugin package. well, not exactly. There they shipped a BSD LICENSE file, but the source files had LGPL headers. Here the only thing wrong is the spec file they ship (which we don't use). In this case it could just be a simple mistake in the spec, in the other one it's hard to say what they intended... This SRPM builds here, source matches, BuildRequires looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From pertusus at free.fr Thu Dec 1 08:46:39 2005 From: pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 09:46:39 +0100 Subject: problem with rcs keywords Message-ID: <20051201084639.GA3972@free.fr> Hello, I have a rcs keyword in a patch (304-update-Imake-config-files.dpatch for cernlib in devel). When it is expanded the patch fails... I did a cvs up -ko for my local repository, but it isn't the case in the buildsystem. What should I do? I think the resolution of this issue should be added to the page http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/UsingCvsFaq if there is a resolution... -- Pat From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 08:48:48 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 03:48:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173671] Review Request: xfce4-weather-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512010848.jB18mmxh023923@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-weather-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173671 luya256 at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From luya256 at yahoo.com 2005-12-01 03:48 EST ------- Congragulations, your src.rpm has succesfully passed the test including rpmlint with built rpm and mock. The spec file fully complies with Packaging Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines. It is the honor to get xfce4-weather-plugin package status as ACCEPTED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From oliver at linux-kernel.at Thu Dec 1 08:57:37 2005 From: oliver at linux-kernel.at (Oliver Falk) Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 09:57:37 +0100 Subject: problem with rcs keywords In-Reply-To: <20051201084639.GA3972@free.fr> References: <20051201084639.GA3972@free.fr> Message-ID: <438EBB01.7070204@linux-kernel.at> On 12/01/2005 09:46 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Hello, > > I have a rcs keyword in a patch (304-update-Imake-config-files.dpatch > for cernlib in devel). When it is expanded the patch fails... I did > a cvs up -ko for my local repository, but it isn't the case in the > buildsystem. What should I do? > > I think the resolution of this issue should be added to the page > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/UsingCvsFaq > if there is a resolution... You can add it with cvs add -kb . This adds the patch as binary and no substition will be made. There is also a -kk option that should be used to do no keywords substitution, but the last time I tried it, it didn't work... Best, Oliver From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 09:29:05 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 04:29:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173672] Review Request: xfce4-windowlist-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512010929.jB19T5Gg027725@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-windowlist-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173672 luya256 at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From luya256 at yahoo.com 2005-12-01 04:29 EST ------- Congragulations, your src.rpm has succesfully passed the test including rpmlint with built rpm and mock. The spec file fully complies with Packaging Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines. It is the honor to get xfce4-windowlist-plugin package status as FE-ACCEPTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 09:38:06 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 04:38:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173552] Review Request: xfce4-sensors-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512010938.jB19c6ag028554@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-sensors-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173552 luya256 at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From luya256 at yahoo.com 2005-12-01 04:38 EST ------- I will review your xfce packages. The result will be displayed later as I will be busy during Pacific daytime. So far, you had two FC-ACCEPTED packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ville.skytta at iki.fi Thu Dec 1 10:18:50 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 12:18:50 +0200 Subject: problem with rcs keywords In-Reply-To: <438EBB01.7070204@linux-kernel.at> References: <20051201084639.GA3972@free.fr> <438EBB01.7070204@linux-kernel.at> Message-ID: <1133432330.7824.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 09:57 +0100, Oliver Falk wrote: > You can add it with cvs add -kb . This adds the patch as > binary and no substition will be made. When the file is not really binary, -ko would be better. And if the file is already in, you should be able to do "cvs admin -ko filename" to fix it in the repository. (Note: no need to commit that, and a "cvs up" is needed to bring your working copy up to date after this.) From pertusus at free.fr Thu Dec 1 10:36:33 2005 From: pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:36:33 +0100 Subject: problem with rcs keywords In-Reply-To: <1133432330.7824.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20051201084639.GA3972@free.fr> <438EBB01.7070204@linux-kernel.at> <1133432330.7824.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20051201103633.GC3870@free.fr> > When the file is not really binary, -ko would be better. > > And if the file is already in, you should be able to do "cvs admin -ko > filename" to fix it in the repository. (Note: no need to commit that, > and a "cvs up" is needed to bring your working copy up to date after > this.) Allright, I didn't knew I had enough rights to do that... Thanks. -- Pat From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 1 10:38:52 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 05:38:52 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051201103852.F03E27FE6@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 9 abcm2ps-4.12.2-1.fc3 centericq-4.21.0-2.fc3 linphone-1.0.1-5.fc3 nfswatch-4.99.5-1.fc3 ortp-0.7.0-4.fc3 ortp-0.7.0-5.fc3 ortp-0.7.0-6.fc3 tetex-xcolor-2.08-1.fc3 ttywatch-0.14-4.fc3 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 1 10:43:08 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 05:43:08 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051201104308.769777FE6@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 12 abcm2ps-4.12.2-1.fc4 centericq-4.21.0-2.fc4 fdupes-1.40-5.fc4 krecipes-0.9-2.fc4 linphone-1.0.1-5.fc4 moin-latex-0-0.20051126.1.fc4 nfswatch-4.99.5-1.fc4 ortp-0.7.0-4.fc4 ortp-0.7.0-5.fc4 ortp-0.7.0-6.fc4 pgp-tools-0.4.4-3.20051123svn.fc4 ttywatch-0.14-4.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 1 10:51:49 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 05:51:49 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051201105149.DCBB17FE6@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 27 abcm2ps-4.12.2-1.fc5 centericq-4.21.0-3.fc5 cone-0.65-2.fc5 cproto-4.7d-2 gnumeric-1.6.1-1 hdf5-1.6.4-7.fc5 libgda-1.9.100-1 libgnomedb-1.9.100-1 libgnomedb-1.9.100-2 libgnomeuimm26-2.12.0-2 libksba-0.9.13-1.fc5 libksba-0.9.13-1.fc5.1 linphone-1.0.1-5.fc5 moin-latex-0-0.20051126.1.fc5 nexuiz-1.2.1-3.fc5 nfswatch-4.99.5-1.fc5 numlockx-1.0-7.fc5 ortp-0.7.0-4.fc5 ortp-0.7.0-5.fc5 ortp-0.7.0-6.fc5 perl-Glib-1.102-1.fc5 perl-Gtk2-1.102-1.fc5 pgp-tools-0.4.4-3.20051123svn.fc5 syslog-ng-1.6.9-1.fc5 ttywatch-0.14-4.fc5 xchat-gnome-0.7-3.fc5 xemacs-21.4.17-7.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 11:41:42 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 06:41:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174680] New: Review Request: Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174680 Summary: Review Request: Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://ss5.sourceforge.net OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: matteo.ricchetti at libero.it QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: SRPM Name or Url: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 11:41:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 06:41:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011141.jB1BfxK6013126@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 matteo.ricchetti at libero.it changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |174680 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 12:10:55 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 07:10:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174680] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011210.jB1CAtwd016681@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174680 ------- Additional Comments From matteo.ricchetti at libero.it 2005-12-01 07:10 EST ------- Sorry I was wrong in Spec Name: Spec Name or Url: Message-ID: <200512011224.jB1COSaQ018028@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: amavisd-new https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167354 ------- Additional Comments From james at westexe.demon.co.uk 2005-12-01 07:24 EST ------- Latest selinux-policy-targeted-1.27.1-2.14.noarch fixes it: thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 13:18:42 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:18:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173552] Review Request: xfce4-sensors-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011318.jB1DIg2p023146@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-sensors-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173552 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-01 08:18 EST ------- But this one also lacked libxfcegui4-devel. - Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs. - Fix %defattr. New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-sensors-plugin-0.7.0-2.fc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 13:23:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:23:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173553] Review Request: xfce4-websearch-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011323.jB1DNwwt023763@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-websearch-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173553 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-01 08:23 EST ------- - Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs. - Fix %defattr. New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-websearch-plugin-0.1.0-4.fc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 13:25:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:25:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173551] Review Request: xfce4-notes-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011325.jB1DPOvW024020@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-notes-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173551 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-01 08:25 EST ------- - Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs. - Fix %defattr. New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-notes-plugin-0.11.1-2.fc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 13:27:05 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:27:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173550] Review Request: xfce4-netload-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011327.jB1DR5Xe024318@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-netload-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173550 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-01 08:26 EST ------- - Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs. - Fix %defattr. New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-netload-plugin-0.3.3-3.fc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 13:28:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:28:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173549] Review Request: xfce4-mount-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011328.jB1DSCoH024454@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-mount-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173549 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-01 08:28 EST ------- - Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs. - Fix %defattr. New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-mount-plugin-0.3.2-3.fc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 13:29:20 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:29:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173548] Review Request: xfce4-modemlights-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011329.jB1DTK01024580@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-modemlights-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173548 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-01 08:29 EST ------- - Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs. - Fix %defattr. New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-modemlights-plugin-0.1.1-3.fc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 13:30:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:30:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173546] Review Request: xfce4-minicmd-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011330.jB1DUcoA024779@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-minicmd-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173546 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-01 08:30 EST ------- - Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs. - Fix %defattr. New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-minicmd-plugin-0.3.0-4.fc4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 13:50:22 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:50:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011350.jB1DoMtv027853@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173105 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-01 08:50 EST ------- Reply from Upstream: Benedikt Meurer (author of xfce4-sample-plugin) said that the COPYING (BSD) file is only a relict from his sample plugin and since LGPL is more restrictive it should be applied to the whole package. Edscott Wilson Garcia (one of the programs authors) wrote: "Yes. Libraries are LGPL, as released in such manner by their initial author. The program source file is BSD, since that is what the initial author (Nicholas Penwarden) thought best." Debian ships this package as BSD http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/x/xfce4-battery-plugin/xfce4-battery-plugin_0.3.0-1/xfce4-battery-plugin.copyright So should we release it LGPL? Do I have to replace the COPYING file then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 1 15:17:59 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:17:59 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051201151759.036D17FE6@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 3 fyre-1.0.0-10.fc3 mod_security-1.9.1-1.fc3 scim-anthy-0.8.0-1.fc3 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 1 15:23:48 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:23:48 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051201152348.460FF7FE6@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 4 fyre-1.0.0-10.fc4 keychain-2.6.1-1.fc4 mod_security-1.9.1-1.fc4 scim-anthy-0.8.0-1.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 1 15:31:52 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:31:52 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051201153152.780B47FE6@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 5 deskbar-applet-0.8.5-2.fc5 fyre-1.0.0-11.fc5 keychain-2.6.1-1.fc5 mod_security-1.9.1-1.fc5 wxGTK-2.6.2-3.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 15:29:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:29:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011529.jB1FT8ng010069@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2005-12-01 10:29 EST ------- It's just a copy-paste of the description provided by the author on the website. I'll make the changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 16:20:40 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:20:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174328] Review Request: tklib - a set of useful packages for Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011620.jB1GKe3H019544@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tklib - a set of useful packages for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174328 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-01 11:20 EST ------- This package provides "make check" possibility, therefore it must be done (in the special %check section of the spec file). For me (under FC3) "make check" fails. Probably it is caused by absence of the files in the normal install path (the files are present under $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at the check time). Probably something another reason... Anyway, try to provide "make check" success at rpmbuild time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 16:33:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:33:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011633.jB1GXbs5022418@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at iagorubio.com 2005-12-01 11:33 EST ------- > "et cetera" are two words I disagree. "Et cetera" are two words in latin, but it have been adopted as one word in most languages with latin roots such as Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, etcetera ... ;) It have been adopted by english from Spanish - I think - an exists in english dictionaries, so if you're not going to tranlate the whole description to latin, to separate "et cetera" makes no sense for me. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=etcetera -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 16:48:54 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:48:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011648.jB1Gms6M025314@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-01 11:48 EST ------- I've never seen it as one word in English - though I have seen it simply abbreviated etc. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 16:55:48 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:55:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011655.jB1Gtm2S025998@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2005-12-01 11:55 EST ------- Iago -- In English, both are valid but have slightly different meanings and connotations. In this case, "et cetera" is correct. However, it's probably better to avoid entirely in %description and actually be specific. Also, this is ridiculously pedantic and none of us should care. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 17:00:51 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:00:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011700.jB1H0pK6026646@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2005-12-01 12:00 EST ------- Yes, can I get some comments that don't deal with orthography? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 17:21:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:21:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011721.jB1HLQwW028936@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173105 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2005-12-01 12:21 EST ------- Since the package has both LGPL (the acpi/apm lib files) and BSD (the main battstat.c file), it should have both in the spec License... BSD and LGPL. I would leave the BSD liscence in the COPYING file (as it is upstream), but perhaps add a LGPL copying file in as well? Then, spec can have: License: BSD and LGPL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 17:48:03 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:48:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011748.jB1Hm3kW000430@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173105 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-01 12:47 EST ------- Ok, here we go: New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-battery-plugin-0.3.0-3.fc4.src.rpm SPEC: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SPECS/xfce4-battery-plugin.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 17:58:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 12:58:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011758.jB1HwbkD002467@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173105 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-01 12:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Since the package has both LGPL (the acpi/apm lib files) and BSD (the main > battstat.c file), it should have both in the spec License... BSD and LGPL. > > I would leave the BSD liscence in the COPYING file (as it is upstream), but > perhaps add a LGPL copying file in as well? > > Then, spec can have: License: BSD and LGPL Sorry, nope. If binary package having been built from sources containing [L]GPL'ed and other licensed source files, automatically is [L]GPL'ed as a whole. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 18:14:17 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:14:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011814.jB1IEHXZ004319@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173105 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2005-12-01 13:14 EST ------- > Sorry, nope. If binary package having been built from sources containing > [L]GPL'ed and other licensed source files, automatically is [L]GPL'ed > as a whole. Really? Do you have a cite or other information on that? libxfce4util needs to be changed to only LGPL if thats the case... also I see libcap in core has "BSD-like and LGPL". Also if thats the case we should update the wiki to mention that in License discussion and reviews. Also, Christoph: xfce4-battery-plugin is missing libxfcegui4-devel as a BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 18:28:30 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:28:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011828.jB1ISUS5006179@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at iagorubio.com 2005-12-01 13:28 EST ------- >> Also, this is ridiculously pedantic and none of us should care Completely agree :) >> Yes, can I get some comments that don't deal with orthography? :) Not too much from my side, but it rebuilds fine - warning user icon does not exist - installs cleanly, and rpmlint is happy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 18:38:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:38:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011838.jB1IcEYK007756@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173105 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-01 13:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > Also, Christoph: xfce4-battery-plugin is missing libxfcegui4-devel as a > BuildRequires. Arghh, yes. I've fixed that in the specfile but I don't want to rebuild the srpm before the license issue is clear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 18:44:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:44:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011844.jB1IiXko008596@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173105 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-01 13:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > Also, Christoph: xfce4-battery-plugin is missing libxfcegui4-devel as a > BuildRequires. Correcting my prevouis comment #8 Nope, sorry, it's there. Both in the srpm and in the specfile on the ftp server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 18:54:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:54:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011854.jB1IsbJF009741@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173105 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2005-12-01 13:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > Sorry, nope. If binary package having been built from sources containing > > [L]GPL'ed and other licensed source files, automatically is [L]GPL'ed > > as a whole. More precisely the whole is redistributed under the terms of the LGPL. But the BSD licenced files remain BSD licenced. So it is more informative to put BSD and LGPL in the licence. The BSD copyright/licence statement is added in the %doc section (it is the COPYING file), there is a LGPL so things are fine. Incidentally the panel-plugin/libacpi.c has a GPL header? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 19:27:36 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:27:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512011927.jB1JRa16014999@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173105 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2005-12-01 14:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #7) > > > Sorry, nope. If binary package having been built from sources containing > > > [L]GPL'ed and other licensed source files, automatically is [L]GPL'ed > > > as a whole. > > More precisely the whole is redistributed under the terms of the LGPL. Then "License" field in the rpm spec imho should only be "LGPL" because it stands for the whole package. Otherwise someone might get the idea that the whole package is under a Dual-BSD/LGPL license. And thats wrong afaics. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From skvidal at phy.duke.edu Thu Dec 1 19:47:59 2005 From: skvidal at phy.duke.edu (seth vidal) Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:47:59 -0500 Subject: rpms/ghdl/devel ghdl.spec,1.1,1.2 In-Reply-To: <200512011940.jB1Jex1H020057@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> References: <200512011940.jB1Jex1H020057@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1133466479.25713.18.camel@cutter> > +# gcc-gnat missing on ppc: Bug 174720 > +# mock does not install glibc-devel.i386 on x86_64, therefore > +# gcc -m32 fails, therefore the package does not build under > +# mock/plague on x86_64: Bug 174731 Why would be building i386 in an x86_64 chroot? -sv From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 1 20:29:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:29:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174328] Review Request: tklib - a set of useful packages for Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512012029.jB1KT0Re026139@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tklib - a set of useful packages for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174328 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2005-12-01 15:28 EST ------- The "make check" failure is caused by a bug in the script that actually performs the check. Here is a new package that fixes the bug and adds the %check section to the spec file. http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tklib-0.4.1-2.src.rpm Patch has been submitted upstream. I'm not sure if this provides anything useful, though. I took a closer look at the script that performs the check, and it will always exit with code '0' unless there is an error in the script itself or if it was invoked with invalid arguments. If any of the checks fail, it will still return with exit code '0'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 03:13:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 22:13:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173669] Review Request: xfce4-taskbar-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512020313.jB23DGOf016695@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-taskbar-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173669 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2005-12-01 22:12 EST ------- good: - source matches upstream - license is good. (BSD... and BSD source! :) - builds and works under fc4. - rpmlint clean - builds fine under mock/devel Everything looks good... APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 03:14:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 22:14:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174260] Review Request: moin-latex : add-on to support LaTeX markup In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512020314.jB23ECaG016872@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moin-latex : add-on to support LaTeX markup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174260 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2005-12-01 22:13 EST ------- Built successfully for FC-4 & devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 03:56:10 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 22:56:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173551] Review Request: xfce4-notes-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512020356.jB23uAD2024224@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-notes-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173551 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2005-12-01 22:55 EST ------- good: - sources match upstream - builds and works on fc4. - license ok. - rpmlint is clean. - builds fine in mock under devel. nits: - NEWS file is pretty useless, might not include it. Everything looks good... APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 04:25:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 23:25:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174783] New: Review Request:
Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174783 Summary: Review Request:
Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gruler/gruler.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gruler/gruler-0.6-1.src.rpm Description: gruler is a customizable screen ruler. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 04:26:13 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 23:26:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512020426.jB24QDbm029243@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 mclasen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |174783 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 04:55:57 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 23:55:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512020455.jB24tvbu032263@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173105 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-01 23:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > (In reply to comment #7) > > > > Sorry, nope. If binary package having been built from sources containing > > > > [L]GPL'ed and other licensed source files, automatically is [L]GPL'ed > > > > as a whole. > > > > More precisely the whole is redistributed under the terms of the LGPL. > > Then "License" field in the rpm spec imho should only be "LGPL" because it > stands for the whole package. Otherwise someone might get the idea that the > whole package is under a Dual-BSD/LGPL license. And thats wrong afaics. Exactly. Though each source file can apply different licenses, the final application binary is being linked against files having been compiled from LGPL'ed sources. Therefore, the final binary application is LGPL'ed, though it's sources are licensed BSD. => I.e. the binary package must be shipped/relicensed under the [L]GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 07:42:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 02:42:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174529] Review Request: clearsilver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512020742.jB27gcYQ013167@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clearsilver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174529 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2005-12-02 02:42 EST ------- I've contacted upstream. Will fix in next version 0.10.2, hopefully released end of this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 08:28:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 03:28:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174783] Review Request: gruler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512020828.jB28SEO5020749@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gruler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174783 adrian at lisas.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |adrian at lisas.de ------- Additional Comments From adrian at lisas.de 2005-12-02 03:27 EST ------- Trying to build in mock gives following error (FC4 and rawhide): creating libtool checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking for libgnomeui-2.0 gtk+-2.0 libglade-2.0... error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.69656 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 08:41:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 03:41:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173675] Review Request: xfce4-xmms-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512020841.jB28fFxE022641@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-xmms-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173675 luya256 at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From luya256 at yahoo.com 2005-12-02 03:41 EST ------- Hello, I completed the review of this packages. It succesfully passed and complied to the package guideline http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines. The package is now set to FE-ACCEPTED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From sailer at sailer.dynip.lugs.ch Fri Dec 2 09:26:17 2005 From: sailer at sailer.dynip.lugs.ch (Thomas Sailer) Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 10:26:17 +0100 Subject: Buildsys problems Message-ID: <1133515577.5850.70.camel@unreal> When trying to build ghdl/devel: $ make tag cvs tag -c ghdl-0_21-0_24svn_2_fc5 For more information on using the Fedora CVS repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs ERROR: Tag ghdl-0_21-0_24svn_2_fc5 has been already created. The following tags have been created so far ghdl-0_21-0_24svn_1:devel:sailer:1133263205 ghdl-0_21-0_24svn_2_fc5:devel:sailer:1133465812 cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! make: *** [tag] Error 1 $ make build ghdl.spec not tagged with tag ghdl-0_21-0_24svn_2_fc5 make: *** [build] Error 1 Manually submitting to plague reveals this: Error: could not check out ghdl-0_21-0_24svn_2_fc5 from fedora-development-extras - output was: cvs checkout: warning: cannot open /cvs/extras/CVSROOT/val-tags read/write: Permission denied cvs [checkout aborted]: no such tag ghdl-0_21-0_24svn_2_fc5 From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 09:29:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 04:29:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512020929.jB29TPRP028231@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173105 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2005-12-02 04:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) > Then "License" field in the rpm spec imho should only be "LGPL" because it > stands for the whole package. Otherwise someone might get the idea that the > whole package is under a Dual-BSD/LGPL license. And thats wrong afaics. Yep, that's true. It's in fact better to avoid people thinking that's it's dual licencing. As there are the 2 licences in %doc, it should be enough to have somebody interested get the srpm and look at the file headers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From sheltren at cs.ucsb.edu Fri Dec 2 10:52:19 2005 From: sheltren at cs.ucsb.edu (Jeff Sheltren) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 06:52:19 -0400 Subject: Buildsys problems In-Reply-To: <1133515577.5850.70.camel@unreal> References: <1133515577.5850.70.camel@unreal> Message-ID: On Dec 2, 2005, at 5:26 AM, Thomas Sailer wrote: > When trying to build ghdl/devel: > > $ make tag > cvs tag -c ghdl-0_21-0_24svn_2_fc5 > For more information on using the Fedora CVS repositories, please > visit > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs > ERROR: Tag ghdl-0_21-0_24svn_2_fc5 has been already created. > The following tags have been created so far > ghdl-0_21-0_24svn_1:devel:sailer:1133263205 > ghdl-0_21-0_24svn_2_fc5:devel:sailer:1133465812 > cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed > cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! > make: *** [tag] Error 1 > > $ make build > ghdl.spec not tagged with tag ghdl-0_21-0_24svn_2_fc5 > make: *** [build] Error 1 > > Manually submitting to plague reveals this: > Error: could not check out ghdl-0_21-0_24svn_2_fc5 from > fedora-development-extras - output was: > > cvs checkout: warning: cannot open /cvs/extras/CVSROOT/val-tags > read/write: Permission denied > cvs [checkout aborted]: no such tag ghdl-0_21-0_24svn_2_fc5 Have you tried incrementing the release number and then re-tagging? -Jeff From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 10:51:22 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 05:51:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174546] Review Request: trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512021051.jB2ApMgw004266@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174546 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-02 05:51 EST ------- 0.9.1 is out, fixes a SQL injection vulnerability. http://seclists.org/lists/bugtraq/2005/Dec/0014.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 12:21:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 07:21:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174328] Review Request: tklib - a set of useful packages for Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512021221.jB2CLxjb014875@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tklib - a set of useful packages for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174328 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |dmitry at butskoy.name OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-02 07:21 EST ------- Remarks & nitpicks: - spec file should not have execution bit set ("chmod -x tklib.spec") - patch filename should have the upstream version included (for the moment the patch is appeared), i.e. tklib-0.4.1-makecheck.patch - remove leading "A" from the Summary field. - add "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" into the beginning of %install section. - IMHO it is a little more robust to use wildcards in the %files section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 13:19:04 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 08:19:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512021319.jB2DJ43p020231@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2005-12-02 08:18 EST ------- I think I'm going nuts here. I've been tampering around with system/initial service half the day without solving the strange font issues. Someone that has any good knowledge of console fonts that can help me? In /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit all that happens related to fonts is that /sbin/setsysfont is run and then the banner is printed out in nice colors without problems. When running /sbin/setsysfont in system/initial it just seems to screw things up. That things that were on the screen before the setsysfont call is garbage is one thing. We can solve that by not printing out the banner until after the call. But it still can't seem to get my nice swedish ?, ? ?nd ?'s right until after someone logs onto the computer and /etc/profile.d/lang.sh (with a call to unicode_start in it) is run. Anyone knows what I'm doing wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From pertusus at free.fr Fri Dec 2 13:43:45 2005 From: pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:43:45 +0100 Subject: asking for review of the cernlib in devel Message-ID: <20051202134345.GB3927@free.fr> Hello, I made a major upgrade to the cernlib package in the devel branch. The change are important and I think that it would be good to have a review, even though it isn't mandatory (and the package is allready built). I want to push those updates to the other branches as it fixes some licence issues. So if somebody is interested, please review. There is nothing specific in the guidelines for such request, is that kind of message to the mailing list enough, or should I open a bugzilla entry? -- Pat From jamatos at fc.up.pt Fri Dec 2 13:59:11 2005 From: jamatos at fc.up.pt (Jose' Matos) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 13:59:11 +0000 Subject: asking for review of the cernlib in devel In-Reply-To: <20051202134345.GB3927@free.fr> References: <20051202134345.GB3927@free.fr> Message-ID: <200512021359.11792.jamatos@fc.up.pt> On Friday 02 December 2005 13:43, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Hello, > > I made a major upgrade to the cernlib package in the devel branch. The > change are important and I think that it would be good to have a review, > even though it isn't mandatory (and the package is allready built). > I want to push those updates to the other branches as it fixes some > licence issues. If it fix the license issues what is stopping you? :-) In my reviews I always favour a detailed analysis of the license. I reviewed cernlib, there I took special care with the license and I have used debian as a basis. Clearly some of those problems are upstream, the project declares itself as GPL but them some parts of it have different licenses, if you can not trust upstream for those details them we are in troubles. :-) I would propose you to release this new version for older Core releases and them propose a review. Any technical problems with the package can be fixed later. The license issue should not wait. > So if somebody is interested, please review. > > There is nothing specific in the guidelines for such request, is that kind > of message to the mailing list enough, or should I open a bugzilla entry? The subject is complex. One option could be the existence of troves, like the freshmeat classification, and then each maintainer could belong to several troves. Since each package (usually) belongs to more than one trove this would give a set o people who are more fit to look to some of those questions instead a relaying in an informal system like what we have now. I have not based this on any know system so what I am proposing could sound archaic and too bureaucratic for the real structure of Extras. It is an assumed risk nevertheless. :-) > -- > Pat -- Jos? Ab?lio From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 13:59:55 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 08:59:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165964] Review Request: intuitively. Automatic IP detection utility In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512021359.jB2DxtSw025639@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: intuitively. Automatic IP detection utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165964 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2005-12-02 08:59 EST ------- Well I think the the real issue is the error message "Cannot chdir to /etc/intuitively/Work/.", there should be a check that the directory exists prior doing the chdir. I don't think it is a good idea to ship with a directory in the default case because intuitively don't need this directory. I plan on doing a patch since a long time but it's not high priority for me. So I will add the package first and do the patch when I get time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From pertusus at free.fr Fri Dec 2 14:23:45 2005 From: pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 15:23:45 +0100 Subject: asking for review of the cernlib in devel In-Reply-To: <200512021359.11792.jamatos@fc.up.pt> References: <20051202134345.GB3927@free.fr> <200512021359.11792.jamatos@fc.up.pt> Message-ID: <20051202142345.GE3927@free.fr> On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 01:59:11PM +0000, Jose' Matos wrote: > On Friday 02 December 2005 13:43, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I made a major upgrade to the cernlib package in the devel branch. The > > change are important and I think that it would be good to have a review, > > even though it isn't mandatory (and the package is allready built). > > I want to push those updates to the other branches as it fixes some > > licence issues. > > If it fix the license issues what is stopping you? :-) As the reporter of the bug states on the debian bug: "No hurry to fix it. It has been "broken" for so many years..." So I would prefer everything to be in order before I push to the other fedora releases. -- Pat From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 15:38:03 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:38:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174328] Review Request: tklib - a set of useful packages for Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512021538.jB2Fc3V9005706@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tklib - a set of useful packages for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174328 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2005-12-02 10:37 EST ------- I won't argue with any of the suggestions, but I do agree that they are nitpicks. :) Here's the next attempt: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tklib-0.4.1-3.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tklib.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 16:03:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 11:03:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174328] Review Request: tklib - a set of useful packages for Tk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512021603.jB2G3xmJ011854@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tklib - a set of useful packages for Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174328 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-02 11:03 EST ------- Built OK MUST/SHOULD items OK APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From gdk at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 17:00:48 2005 From: gdk at redhat.com (Greg DeKoenigsberg) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:00:48 -0500 (EST) Subject: psiconv possible legal issues In-Reply-To: References: <438DCD60.7060904@hhs.nl> Message-ID: +1 Unless there are clear patent issues, I see no problem with this. --g _____________________ ____________________________________________ Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent. the Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the ] [ dumb. --mcluhan On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > I'm thinking about packaging psiconv, this is a conversion utility for > > Psion handheld document formats. The problem is that it might have legal > > issues because it is based on reverse engineering of the document format. > > Reverse engineering for interoperability is legal in all countries of the > civilized world, the only problem arise when there are patents involved > and I hardly believe that Psions document format is so ingenious that it > is patented. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_engineering > > Linus > > -- > fedora-extras-list mailing list > fedora-extras-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list > From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Fri Dec 2 20:03:11 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 15:03:11 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051202200311.02FC88006@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 12 baobab-2.2.0-1.fc5 cernlib-2005-6.fc5.1 cernlib-2005-7.fc5 gc-6.6-4.fc5 ghdl-0.21-0.24svn.3.fc5 gnupg2-1.9.19-8.fc5 hdf5-1.6.4-8.fc5 intuitively-0.7-6.fc5 ipython-0.6.15-1.fc5 octave-2.9.4-3.fc5 scim-skk-0.5.0-1.fc5 tklib-0.4.1-3.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Fri Dec 2 20:33:47 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 15:33:47 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051202203347.61FB28006@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 7 baobab-2.2.0-1.fc4 digikam-0.8.0-1.fc4 digikamimageplugins-0.8.0-1.fc4 gc-6.6-4.fc4 hdf5-1.6.4-5.fc4 scim-skk-0.5.0-1.fc4 tklib-0.4.1-3.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Fri Dec 2 20:45:03 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 15:45:03 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051202204503.15F4A8006@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 1 gc-6.6-4.fc3 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 20:42:45 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 15:42:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512022042.jB2KgjaV031036@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2005-12-02 15:42 EST ------- http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/tmp/pari-2.1.7-3.src.rpm http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/tmp/pari.spec Builds now for the 'none' architecture. In this config static libraries are built instead of shared ones. I renamed the libpari.a.2.1 to libpari.a, since versioned static libraries seem to be very unusual. rpmlint is satisfied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 22:50:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 17:50:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512022250.jB2MoGV6026256@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2005-12-02 17:50 EST ------- mockbuild fails: ... Patch #1 (gst-2.2-am.patch): + patch -p1 -b --suffix .org -s + exit 0 Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.31985 + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd smalltalk-2.2 + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + automake configure.ac:20: version mismatch. This is Automake 1.9.5, configure.ac:20: but the definition used by this AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE configure.ac:20: comes from Automake 1.9.6. You should recreate configure.ac:20: aclocal.m4 with aclocal and run automake again. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.31985 (%build) Possibly patch "configure" directly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 23:19:13 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 18:19:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174866] New: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174866 Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://0pointer.de/lennart/projects/polypaudio OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/polypaudio.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/polypaudio-0.7-1.src.rpm Description: polypaudio is a sound server for Linux and other Unix like operating systems. It is intended to be an improved drop-in replacement for the Enlightened Sound Daemon (ESOUND). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 2 23:19:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 18:19:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512022319.jB2NJTSG028469@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |174866 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ivazquez at ivazquez.net Fri Dec 2 23:45:45 2005 From: ivazquez at ivazquez.net (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams) Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:45:45 -0500 Subject: common tobuild,..... In-Reply-To: <200512022309.jB2N9CIW009323@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> References: <200512022309.jB2N9CIW009323@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1133567146.5634.6.camel@ignacio.lan> On ..., ... at ..., ... wrote: > request build of... Just out of curiosity *why* is this file not dead yet? -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 02:45:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 21:45:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512030245.jB32jx8o013197@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2005-12-02 21:45 EST ------- cant get it to work on x86_64 rawhide. halts when initng should be executed. rebuild on x86_64 with latest spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 03:05:21 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 22:05:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174325] Review Request: mod_spin Apache module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512030305.jB335LRf014458@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_spin Apache module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174325 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2005-12-02 22:05 EST ------- FYI: Just compiled mod_spin trunk against Apache 2.2.0 (not packaged). No issues, runs fine too. So, when 2.2 becomes part of Rawhide, we should be really close. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 06:11:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 01:11:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166919] Review Request: findlib In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512030611.jB36BVZR031607@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: findlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166919 ------- Additional Comments From descender at phreaker.net 2005-12-03 01:11 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://beep-media-player.org/~descender/files/findlib.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://beep-media-player.org/~descender/files/findlib-1.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: Update to 1.1.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 06:18:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 01:18:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168310] Review Request: swish-e In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512030618.jB36INTa031954@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swish-e https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168310 ------- Additional Comments From bkyoung at users.sourceforge.net 2005-12-03 01:18 EST ------- user.cwnet.com/~bkyoung/swish-e Spec Name or Url: swish-e.spec.17 SRPM Name or Url: swish-e-2.4.2-17.fc5.src.rpm Fixed an RPATH issue, and advanced to FC5-test1. No new major problems have been reported recently, so if there are no objections, I'll add it to extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 06:31:03 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 01:31:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512030631.jB36V3qo032517@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-03 01:30 EST ------- I have the same problem as I wrote in comment #60 but forgot to mention that I am using x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 06:55:50 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 01:55:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174879] New: Review Request: giFT (giftd) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174879 Summary: Review Request: giFT (giftd) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://members.shaw.ca/znapora/gift/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: agentunix at gmail.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://members.shaw.ca/znapora/gift/gift.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://members.shaw.ca/znapora/gift/giftd-0.11.8.1-1.src.rpm Description: giFT is a `recursive' acronym for `giFT: Internet File Transfer'. The giFT project is actually a collection of several components together: the giFT daemon (which acts as bridge to the actual file sharing protocols), the network plugin, and a user interface front-end. Requires: (provided with binary rpms) libgift, libgiftproto (Note: Currently seeking sponsor for Znapora) Comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 06:56:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 01:56:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512030656.jB36u219001763@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 agentunix at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |174879 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 07:43:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 02:43:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174879] Review Request: giFT (giftd) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512030743.jB37hwuq004484@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: giFT (giftd) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174879 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-03 02:43 EST ------- Gift is already hosted at rpm.livna.org (due to potential legalities wrt file sharing). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 08:04:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 03:04:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512030804.jB384Z9f006810@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-03 03:04 EST ------- x86_64 problems are probably caused by | open("/lib/initng", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK|O_DIRECTORY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) (see comment #50) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 09:27:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 04:27:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512030927.jB39RNPI013110@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-03 04:27 EST ------- ok did ln -s /lib64/initng /lib/initng and got it to boot. it bootet very fast(!!). but its still buggy... first: after booting usb wasn't working had to do modprobe usb-controller1 and modprobe usb-controller to get it working and shutdown seems to be broken.... it segfaulted (had to press reset) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 10:00:30 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 05:00:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174546] Review Request: trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512031000.jB3A0UpL016480@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174546 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2005-12-03 05:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > 0.9.1 is out, fixes a SQL injection vulnerability. > http://seclists.org/lists/bugtraq/2005/Dec/0014.html Spec file and SRPM updated to 0.9.1: Spec Name or Url: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/trac/trac.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/trac/trac-0.9.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 10:49:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 05:49:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512031049.jB3Andq5030287@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-03 05:49 EST ------- Would you also consider packaging the perl interface to pari, Math::Pari (http://search.cpan.org/dist/Math-Pari/)? This module is used by several crypo modules I'm interested in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 12:30:43 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 07:30:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174883] New: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174883 Summary: Review Request: distcc -- A free distributed C/C++ compiler system Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://distcc.samba.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://ensc.de/fedora/distcc.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://ensc.de/fedora/distcc-2.18.3-1.src.rpm Description: distcc is a program to distribute compilation of C or C++ code across several machines on a network. distcc should always generate the same results as a local compile, is simple to install and use, and is often two or more times faster than a local compile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 12:30:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 07:30:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512031230.jB3CUwC7008048@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |174883 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Sat Dec 3 12:53:26 2005 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 13:53:26 +0100 Subject: psiconv, eligible for extras? In-Reply-To: <1133362318.3061.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <438B7686.8060909@hhs.nl> <1133362318.3061.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <43919546.70805@hhs.nl> Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 22:28 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm thinking about packaging psiconv, this is a conversion utility for >> Psion handheld document formats. The problem is that it might have legal >> issues because it is based on reverse engineering of the document format. >> >> See: >> http://software.frodo.looijaard.name/psiconv/ >> >> I would like to package this since both abiword and gnumeric can use it >> to gain Psion document import capabilities. > > Looks ok to me at first glance (DMCA compliant reverse engineering for > interoperability, no patents on the file format), but it should probably > go for legal review. > Hmm, I'm getting mixed response on this: Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > +1 > > Unless there are clear patent issues, I see no problem with this. > > --g So what shall it be can I proceed or should I wait for legal review? Thanks & Regards, Hans From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Sat Dec 3 13:03:39 2005 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 14:03:39 +0100 Subject: dosemu, elligible for extras or does it have legal issues? Message-ID: <439197AB.8090309@hhs.nl> Hi, I seem to have a knack for choosing legally touch and go software to package. I'm thinking about packaging dosemu. Which despite the name is not really an emulator. It is virtual pc software much like vmware, except that it only emulates enough PC to get dos and dpmi apps running and not enough for any protected mode software which does not use DPMI, like say windows. One big advantage it has over vmware is that its limited virtual PC emulated can be done without any kernel patches, and even without any root rights. Its license is basic GPL with some extra conditions: Copyright of DOSEMU, October 2000 ================================= 1. All sources in the official distribution of DOSEMU are (C) Copyright 1992, ..., 2005 the "DOSEMU-Development-Team" unless explicitly stated otherwise. The DOSEMU-Development-Team is legally represented by its current co-ordinator: 1992 Matthias Lautner 1993 Robert Sanders 1994 .. 1996 James MacLean 1997 .. 2001 Hans Lermen 2001 .. now Bart Oldeman Every co-ordinator passes on the right to represent to his successor. 2. This copyright does not cover all parts of the DOSEMU code! Parts of the code not covered by the GPL are marked explicitly within the code, the rest of the code _is_ GPL. 3. Some code, that was covered by GNU LIBRARY GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE (GLGPL) has been transformed to GPL as is allowed by the GLGPL section 3. This code is marked with an appropriate text at the beginning of each file involved. 4. The nature of DOSEMU requires the use of (ie "booting") a DOS, which may be proprietary. This could be interpreted as 'library linking' the DOS functions to DOSEMU (this view comes from interpreting more into the current version (2) of the GPL than is actually defined). However, recent discussions about the scope of 'library linking' with GPL code and the possibility that future versions of the GPL may define this issue in a more restrictive manner, make it necessary to restrict the DOSEMU copyright explicitly to version 2 of the GPL. ============ === We grant the right to use a proprietary DOS together with DOSEMU. 5. Redistributors of DOSEMU sources must not re-package the official DOSEMU packages, including the compression method. Putting the unchanged compressed DOSEMU packages within envelops (e.g. *.rpm, *.deb, double compress) is allowed. 6. This file (COPYING) has to be distributed unchanged together with the DOSEMU distribution or any derivative work. This prefix and the following appended GPL must not be separated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, June 1991 Point 2 is AFAIK the only probable problem, but I've taken a look at all copyright headers and there are the following non GPL copyrights: -BSD (X11) like -old XFree86 (X11) -old Wine license (X11 like) -LGPL -public domain These are AFAIK all GPL compatible and thus (IANAL) no problem. So my question is can this be packaged as part of Fedora? It has been part of Debian in the main repo, but currently is unmaintained in Debian. Thanks & Regards, Hans From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 13:52:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 08:52:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512031352.jB3DqNYP013174@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2005-12-03 08:51 EST ------- it segfaulted for me on x86_64 rawhide at startup already. but symlinking made it start up at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From triad at df.lth.se Sat Dec 3 14:13:09 2005 From: triad at df.lth.se (Linus Walleij) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 15:13:09 +0100 (CET) Subject: dosemu, elligible for extras or does it have legal issues? In-Reply-To: <439197AB.8090309@hhs.nl> References: <439197AB.8090309@hhs.nl> Message-ID: On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, Hans de Goede wrote: > I'm thinking about packaging dosemu. Cool. > Its license is basic GPL with some extra conditions: Basically it seems to be fully GPL-compatible, given: > 2. This copyright does not cover all parts of the DOSEMU code! > Parts of the code not covered by the GPL are marked explicitly > within the code, the rest of the code _is_ GPL. Which license does the parts not covered by GPL use? If its GPL-compatible (BSD-nonattributive, etc) it's OK, if it's proprietary it's probably not. Linus From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 14:12:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 09:12:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168310] Review Request: swish-e In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512031412.jB3ECfiv014514@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swish-e https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168310 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2005-12-03 09:12 EST ------- This package still hasn't been approved yet. This package still appears to be at step 6 of the procedures for inclusion to FE. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From mattdm at mattdm.org Sat Dec 3 15:58:43 2005 From: mattdm at mattdm.org (Matthew Miller) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:58:43 -0500 Subject: dosemu, elligible for extras or does it have legal issues? In-Reply-To: <439197AB.8090309@hhs.nl> References: <439197AB.8090309@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <20051203155843.GA10617@jadzia.bu.edu> On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 02:03:39PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > I'm thinking about packaging dosemu. Which despite the name is not > really an emulator. It is virtual pc software much like vmware, except > that it only emulates enough PC to get dos and dpmi apps running and not > enough for any protected mode software which does not use DPMI, like say > windows. > One big advantage it has over vmware is that its limited virtual PC > emulated can be done without any kernel patches, and even without any > root rights. Note that we already have DOSbox, which emulates a whole i386 with VGA + DOS (no separate DOS needed). Downside is that it's somewhat slower on an actual x86 machine, because of the extra emulation layer, but then, it does run on all platforms, and does an amazing job even with graphical apps. > 4. The nature of DOSEMU requires the use of (ie "booting") a DOS, > which may be proprietary. This could be interpreted as 'library > linking' the DOS functions to DOSEMU (this view comes from Using FreeDOS should alleviate this concern. (In fact, it may be useful to actually bundle FreeDOS into any DOSEmu RPM, so that it's actually useful out-of-the-box.) > 5. Redistributors of DOSEMU sources must not re-package the official > DOSEMU packages, including the compression method. > Putting the unchanged compressed DOSEMU packages within envelops > (e.g. *.rpm, *.deb, double compress) is allowed. Err, that seems weird and would make this incompatible with any other GPL'd programs, since it would make forking impossible. -- Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org Boston University Linux ------> From gemi at bluewin.ch Sat Dec 3 16:10:03 2005 From: gemi at bluewin.ch (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard?= Milmeister) Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 17:10:03 +0100 Subject: dosemu, elligible for extras or does it have legal issues? In-Reply-To: <439197AB.8090309@hhs.nl> References: <439197AB.8090309@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <1133626204.5717.0.camel@scriabin.tannenrauch.ch> On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 14:03 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > I seem to have a knack for choosing legally touch and go software to > package. > > I'm thinking about packaging dosemu. Which despite the name is not > really an emulator. It is virtual pc software much like vmware, except > that it only emulates enough PC to get dos and dpmi apps running and not > enough for any protected mode software which does not use DPMI, like say > windows. You may have a look at the dosemu rpm I have made: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/4/i386/SRPMS.gemi/dosemu-1.3.2-1.src.rpm -- G?rard Milmeister Langackerstrasse 49 CH-8057 Z?rich From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 16:19:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 11:19:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512031619.jB3GJGah022754@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2005-12-03 11:18 EST ------- to summarize up the x86_64 problems/warnings while building: Those warnings could be a cause for the segfaults. + /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot ******************************************************************************* * * WARNING: 'check-rpaths' detected a broken RPATH and will cause 'rpmbuild' * to fail. To ignore these errors, you can set the '$QA_RPATHS' * environment variable which is a bitmask allowing the values * below. The current value of QA_RPATHS is 0x0000. * * 0x0001 ... standard RPATHs (e.g. /usr/lib); such RPATHs are a minor * issue but are introducing redundant searchpaths without * providing a benefit. They can also cause errors in multilib * environments. * 0x0002 ... invalid RPATHs; these are RPATHs which are neither absolute * nor relative filenames and can therefore be a SECURITY risk * 0x0004 ... insecure RPATHs; these are relative RPATHs which are a * SECURITY risk * 0x0008 ... the special '$ORIGIN' RPATHs are appearing after other * RPATHs; this is just a minor issue but usually unwanted * 0x0010 ... the RPATH is empty; there is no reason for such RPATHs * and they cause unneeded work while loading libraries * 0x0020 ... an RPATH references '..' of an absolute path; this will break * the functionality when the path before '..' is a symlink * * * Examples: * - to ignore standard and empty RPATHs, execute 'rpmbuild' like * $ QA_RPATHS=$[ 0x0001|0x0010 ] rpmbuild my-package.src.rpm * - to check existing files, set $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and execute check-rpaths like * $ RPM_BUILD_ROOT= /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths * * 'check-rpaths' is part of 'fedora-rpmdevtools'. * ******************************************************************************* ERROR 0001: file '/sbin/initng' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64]ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libngc2.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libnetprobe.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libchdir.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libsimplelauncher.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libfind.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/librenice.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libcron.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libidleprobe.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libchroot.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libcritical.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libsyslog.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libstcmd.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libsyncron.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libpause.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libcpout.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libhistory.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libpidfile.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libiparser.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libstdout.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libdepend.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libsuid.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libunneeded.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libinitctl.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libreload.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libfstat.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/liblast.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libbashlaunch.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/librlparser.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/liblimit.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libenvparser.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/librespawn.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libdparser.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libalso.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/lib64/initng/libinteractive.so' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=nocona -c ngc2.c ngc2.c: In function 'send_command': ngc2.c:191: warning: ignoring return value of 'read', declared with attribute warn_unused_result ngc2.c: In function 'ngc_start_result': ngc2.c:287: warning: ignoring return value of 'read', declared with attribute warn_unused_result ngc2.c: In function 'ngc_stop_result': ngc2.c:341: warning: ignoring return value of 'read', declared with attribute warn_unused_result ngc2.c:370: warning: ignoring return value of 'read', declared with attribute warn_unused_result gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=nocona -Wp,-MD,.deps/initng_ngc2.pp -c initng_ngc2.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/initng_ngc2.o initng_ngc2.c: In function 'doread': initng_ngc2.c:182: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c:201: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c:214: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c:225: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c:246: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c:264: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c:285: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c:299: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c:311: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c:321: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c: In function 'cmd_help': initng_ngc2.c:629: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c: In function 'cmd_start': initng_ngc2.c:645: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c:656: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c:674: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c: In function 'cmd_stop': initng_ngc2.c:689: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c:700: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c:720: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c: In function 'cmd_options': initng_ngc2.c:751: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c:774: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c: In function 'cmd_services': initng_ngc2.c:811: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result initng_ngc2.c:831: warning: ignoring return value of 'fwrite', declared with attribute warn_unused_result gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=nocona -c install_service.c install_service.c: In function 'load_overlay_file': install_service.c:124: warning: ignoring return value of 'fgets', declared with attribute warn_unused_result install_service.c: In function 'do_exec': install_service.c:609: warning: ignoring return value of 'pipe', declared with attribute warn_unused_result install_service.c:610: warning: ignoring return value of 'pipe', declared with attribute warn_unused_result install_service.c:643: warning: ignoring return value of 'write', declared with attribute warn_unused_result install_service.c:644: warning: ignoring return value of 'write', declared with attribute warn_unused_result -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 16:27:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 11:27:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166255] Review Request: Sprog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512031627.jB3GRqq6023311@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sprog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166255 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2005-12-03 11:27 EST ------- Sorry it took so long to get back to this. I'm having trouble getting to the http://www.perl.me.uk/downloads/modules/ directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 16:42:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 11:42:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168310] Review Request: swish-e In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512031642.jB3Gg0EO024083@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swish-e https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168310 ------- Additional Comments From bkyoung at users.sourceforge.net 2005-12-03 11:41 EST ------- The person that reviewed it never promoted it to FE-REVIEW, so FE-ACCEPT is blocked. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewGuidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 16:50:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 11:50:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168310] Review Request: swish-e In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512031650.jB3Go2CH024584@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swish-e https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168310 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2005-12-03 11:49 EST ------- Are you referring to comment 13? Based on his comments, I don't believe that Michael ever approved this. It looks like he was only providing some feedback on your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 17:04:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:04:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174898] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174898 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://users.cwnet.com/~bkyoung/perl-HTML- FillInForm/perl-HTML-FillInForm-1.06-4.fc5.src.rpm OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: bkyoung at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://users.cwnet.com/~bkyoung/perl-HTML-FillInForm/perl-HTML-FillInForm.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://users.cwnet.com/~bkyoung/perl-HTML-FillInForm/perl-HTML-FillInForm-1.06-4.fc5.src.rpm Description: CPAN module. Populates HTML Forms with data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 17:05:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:05:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512031705.jB3H5EaP025467@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 bkyoung at users.sourceforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |174898 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Sat Dec 3 17:43:57 2005 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 18:43:57 +0100 Subject: dosemu, elligible for extras or does it have legal issues? In-Reply-To: References: <439197AB.8090309@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <4391D95D.302@hhs.nl> Linus Walleij wrote: > Basically it seems to be fully GPL-compatible, given: > >> 2. This copyright does not cover all parts of the DOSEMU code! >> Parts of the code not covered by the GPL are marked explicitly >> within the code, the rest of the code _is_ GPL. > > Which license does the parts not covered by GPL use? If its > GPL-compatible (BSD-nonattributive, etc) it's OK, if it's proprietary > it's probably not. > Erm, without meaning to be rude in anyway, next time please read my complete mail, to answer your question and quote from my previous mail: --- Point 2 is AFAIK the only probable problem, but I've taken a look at all copyright headers and there are the following non GPL copyrights: -BSD (X11) like -old XFree86 (X11) -old Wine license (X11 like) -LGPL -public domain These are AFAIK all GPL compatible and thus (IANAL) no problem. --- Thanks & Regards, Hans From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Sat Dec 3 17:48:36 2005 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 18:48:36 +0100 Subject: dosemu, elligible for extras or does it have legal issues? In-Reply-To: <20051203155843.GA10617@jadzia.bu.edu> References: <439197AB.8090309@hhs.nl> <20051203155843.GA10617@jadzia.bu.edu> Message-ID: <4391DA74.2070001@hhs.nl> Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 02:03:39PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> I'm thinking about packaging dosemu. Which despite the name is not >> really an emulator. It is virtual pc software much like vmware, except >> that it only emulates enough PC to get dos and dpmi apps running and not >> enough for any protected mode software which does not use DPMI, like say >> windows. >> One big advantage it has over vmware is that its limited virtual PC >> emulated can be done without any kernel patches, and even without any >> root rights. > > Note that we already have DOSbox, which emulates a whole i386 with VGA + DOS > (no separate DOS needed). Downside is that it's somewhat slower on an actual > x86 machine, because of the extra emulation layer, but then, it does run on > all platforms, and does an amazing job even with graphical apps. > I know, but thats a true PC emulator (like qemu), this uses v86 mode making it much much faster, and since it is specifically targeted at dos it comes with some dos kernel emulating / patching functions too, which allows using Linux directories as drive letters, which is much easier then working with images. And as always, choice is good! >> 4. The nature of DOSEMU requires the use of (ie "booting") a DOS, >> which may be proprietary. This could be interpreted as 'library >> linking' the DOS functions to DOSEMU (this view comes from > > Using FreeDOS should alleviate this concern. (In fact, it may be useful to > actually bundle FreeDOS into any DOSEmu RPM, so that it's actually useful > out-of-the-box.) > I'm planning on packaging freedos too, or even packaging it with freedos, but that will be a seperate thread. I'm taking one step at a time :) >> 5. Redistributors of DOSEMU sources must not re-package the official >> DOSEMU packages, including the compression method. >> Putting the unchanged compressed DOSEMU packages within envelops >> (e.g. *.rpm, *.deb, double compress) is allowed. > > Err, that seems weird and would make this incompatible with any other GPL'd > programs, since it would make forking impossible. > They are talking about redistributing the sources, redistributing modifed binaries is fine as is SRPM since that contains original tarbal + patches. I think a fork would not be "Redistributors of DOSEMU sources" but distributing of a derative work which is fine too. What they are trying todo is to make sure any source tarbals out there are unmodified, or have a different name (IANAL). Regards, Hans From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 18:20:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 13:20:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166255] Review Request: Sprog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512031820.jB3IKnem031237@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sprog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166255 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2005-12-03 13:20 EST ------- Okay... Sprog-0.14-4.noarch.rpm builds in mock against fedora core development Good: rpnlint returns clean for mock built Sprog-0.14-4.fc5.noarch.rpm specfile and packagenaming are good Licensed as perl: GPL or Artistic Has a desktop file. no pre/post scriplets md5sum of Source in srpm agrees with upstream source url in spec. listed buildrequires look good no shared or static libs owns all the directories it creates no -devel subpackage needed patch to turn off some bogus test results in mock/buildsystem looks fine mock built package seems to work on shallow functionality testing Bad: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines Doesn't BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils doesn't use desktop-file-install in %install Needed Changes: *need to add desktop-file-utils usage as outlined in http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines *Need to remove the explicit license files being created from perdoc There was a policy change the policy now reads: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewGuidelines - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. I've made the necessary changes in Sprog-0.14-5.src.rpm http://jef.is-a-geek.com/downloads/Sprog/Sprog-0.14-5.fc5.noarch.rpm http://jef.is-a-geek.com/downloads/Sprog/Sprog-0.14-5.fc5.src.rpm http://jef.is-a-geek.com/downloads/Sprog/Sprog.spec I'm starting the clock for approval. If I don't hear anything back about problems with Sprog-0.14-5 I'll approve this in 24 hours. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 18:53:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 13:53:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166255] Review Request: Sprog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512031853.jB3IrRH4001038@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sprog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166255 ------- Additional Comments From ghenry at suretecsystems.com 2005-12-03 13:53 EST ------- My fault, sorry. Was setting up Catalyst on that domain, and forgot to put it back. Gavin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 19:10:50 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:10:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512031910.jB3JAoSD002101@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-03 14:10 EST ------- I submitted some patches upstream http://bugzilla.initng.thinktux.net/show_bug.cgi?id=310 http://bugzilla.initng.thinktux.net/show_bug.cgi?id=311 http://bugzilla.initng.thinktux.net/show_bug.cgi?id=312 http://bugzilla.initng.thinktux.net/show_bug.cgi?id=313 which might fix some segfaults. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 19:27:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:27:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169754] Review Request: tclxml - XML parsing package for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512031927.jB3JRTs7003652@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclxml - XML parsing package for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169754 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-03 14:27 EST ------- Good: - rpmlint only complains about the no docs on -devel -expat and -libxml2, ignored as described in comment 2 - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (BSD-like) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC4 i386 - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - devel requires base package n-v-r APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From triad at df.lth.se Sat Dec 3 19:32:58 2005 From: triad at df.lth.se (Linus Walleij) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 20:32:58 +0100 (CET) Subject: dosemu, elligible for extras or does it have legal issues? In-Reply-To: <4391D95D.302@hhs.nl> References: <439197AB.8090309@hhs.nl> <4391D95D.302@hhs.nl> Message-ID: On Sat, 3 Dec 2005, Hans de Goede wrote: > Erm, without meaning to be rude in anyway, next time please read my complete > mail, to answer your question and quote from my previous mail: Heheh yeah sorry Hans, I was confused by the heading of the GPLv2 so I thought the rest of the mail was a copy of GPL... Anyway all the licenses seems OK so I'd say just put dosemu in. Linus From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 19:31:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:31:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169754] Review Request: tclxml - XML parsing package for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512031931.jB3JVq3d003990@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclxml - XML parsing package for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169754 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-03 14:31 EST ------- Forgot one thing, before building add %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 19:50:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:50:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169754] Review Request: tclxml - XML parsing package for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512031950.jB3JoZe1005963@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclxml - XML parsing package for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169754 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-03 14:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > %post -p /sbin/ldconfig > %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig No libs are installed in the dynamic linker's default paths, so that's not needed. Is there a good reason to ship the static libraries in -devel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 20:00:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 15:00:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174486] Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512032000.jB3K0VN2006975@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-03 15:00 EST ------- Processing files: libopensync-0.18-1 error: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/libopensync-0.18-1-root-build/usr/lib/python*/* Error: SWIG is not installed. You should look at http://www.swig.org Need BuildReqiures: python-devel swig Also, when it builds rpmlint shows: W: libopensync no-version-in-last-changelog W: libopensync non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ld.so.conf.d/libopensync-32.conf W: libopensync-debuginfo no-version-in-last-changelog E: libopensync-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/libopensync-0.18/opensync/opensync_internals.h E: libopensync-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/libopensync-0.18/opensync/opensync.h E: libopensync-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/libopensync-0.18/osengine/osengine_engine.c E: libopensync-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/libopensync-0.18/opensync/opensync_env.c W: libopensync-devel no-version-in-last-changelog -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 20:01:57 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 15:01:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168310] Review Request: swish-e In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512032001.jB3K1v1G007150@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swish-e https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168310 ------- Additional Comments From bkyoung at users.sourceforge.net 2005-12-03 15:01 EST ------- The mentioned issues, and others, are resolved and acceptable. Only the primary reviewer can accept the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 20:38:48 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 15:38:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168310] Review Request: swish-e In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512032038.jB3KcmNm009450@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swish-e https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168310 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2005-12-03 15:38 EST ------- There seems to be a communication break-down here. Where is the review that states that this package has been approved? Looking through the comments here, I cannot see any that state this. In addition, I can only assume that you think Michael provided a review, but it looks like he was only providing you some feedback, since he never assigned the bug to himself for review. Looking at you account information, it appears Elliot Lee is your sponsor. I would suggest working with your sponser on getting this package approved, since the information on the wiki obviously isn't providing you with enough information on the steps necessary to get this into FE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 21:27:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 16:27:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169731] Review Request: ecl - Embeddable Common-Lisp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512032127.jB3LRIxE014789@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecl - Embeddable Common-Lisp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169731 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-03 16:27 EST ------- Using http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/4/i386/SRPMS.gemi/ecl-0.9h-1.src.rpm Missing BuildRequires: m4 texinfo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 21:37:40 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 16:37:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166796] Review Request: cmucl-19c-1.pre1: CMU Common Lisp compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512032137.jB3Lbeuo015960@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cmucl-19c-1.pre1: CMU Common Lisp compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166796 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-03 16:37 EST ------- http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/fedora/all/SRPMS/stable/cmucl-19c-1.pre1.src.rpm is 404 not found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 3 22:52:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 17:52:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166796] Review Request: cmucl-19c-1.pre1: CMU Common Lisp compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512032252.jB3MqXQm023166@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cmucl-19c-1.pre1: CMU Common Lisp compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166796 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-03 17:52 EST ------- 19c final was just released Friday... will update here asap (probably Monday) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 00:19:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 19:19:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512040019.jB40JQFW032040@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2005-12-03 19:19 EST ------- still segfaults btw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 00:19:30 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 19:19:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169731] Review Request: ecl - Embeddable Common-Lisp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512040019.jB40JUql032063@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecl - Embeddable Common-Lisp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169731 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2005-12-03 19:19 EST ------- I am not sure it makes much sense to split off a devel package. Ecl can be considered a development package in itself (we took this view for clisp for example). IF a devel is split off, then we must decide what belongs to it (apart from the .h files). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 00:26:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 19:26:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174915] New: Review Request: gnome-sudoku - A numerical logic puzzle game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174915 Summary: Review Request: gnome-sudoku - A numerical logic puzzle game Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://rpm.frields.org/extras-testing/gnome-sudoku/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: stickster at gmail.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://rpm.frields.org/extras-testing/gnome-sudoku/gnome-sudoku.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://rpm.frields.org/extras-testing/gnome-sudoku/gnome-sudoku-0.3.4-1.src.rpm Description: A GNOME version of Sudoku, a Japanese numerical logic puzzle game. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 00:27:21 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 19:27:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512040027.jB40RLbt000482@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 stickster at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |174915 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 02:39:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 21:39:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168310] Review Request: swish-e In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512040239.jB42d2bX011140@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swish-e https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168310 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-12-03 21:38 EST ------- It is the sponsor's responsibility to make sure a contributor is educated in the guidelines and process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sun Dec 4 02:42:39 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 21:42:39 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051204024239.3FBEF8006@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 5 check-0.9.3-3.fc3 intuitively-0.7-6.fc3 perl-DBD-SQLite-1.11-1.fc3 scim-skk-0.5.0-1.fc3 syslog-ng-1.6.9-1.fc3 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bojan at rexursive.com Sun Dec 4 02:50:17 2005 From: bojan at rexursive.com (Bojan Smojver) Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 13:50:17 +1100 Subject: libapreq2 rebuild Message-ID: <1133664617.31342.0.camel@coyote.rexursive.com> With new APR/APU and httpd now now in Rawhide, could someone push a rebuild of libapreq2 in extras? -- Bojan From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sun Dec 4 02:51:29 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 21:51:29 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051204025129.D52AD8006@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 5 athcool-0.3.11-3.fc4 check-0.9.3-3.fc4 intuitively-0.7-6.fc4 perl-DBD-SQLite-1.11-1.fc4 syslog-ng-1.6.9-1.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sun Dec 4 03:16:29 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 22:16:29 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051204031629.C961A8006@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 4 athcool-0.3.11-3.fc5 check-0.9.3-3.fc5 jed-0.99.17-0.pre135.1 perl-DBD-SQLite-1.11-1.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 03:43:47 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 22:43:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173546] Review Request: xfce4-minicmd-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512040343.jB43hl86015463@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-minicmd-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173546 luya256 at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From luya256 at yahoo.com 2005-12-03 22:43 EST ------- Set to FE-ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 03:48:19 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 22:48:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173040] Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512040348.jB43mJll016155@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173040 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-12-03 22:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) >> To make builds reproducible, you should either add the BuildRequires: >> or use '--disable-valgrind'. Because it does not seem to introduce >> additional dependencies, I do not see reasons to disable it. > OK, added valgrind to BuildRequires Is that valgrind only used for an optional build-time check? One major drawback of requiring valgrind during build is artificially limiting the architectures that this can be included on. valgrind's x86_64 support is very new, and it doesn't run on ppc at all. I would recommend disabling valgrind explicitly during rpmbuild for this reason. I would encourage you to please look into reviewing other contributor's packages in order to demonstrate to the sponsors that you truly understand the packaging guidelines and project processes, as that is the main thing we are looking for in candidates for sponsorship. I am considering sponsoring you soon, but I am looking more into your participation first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 04:08:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 23:08:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173040] Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512040408.jB448XfH018117@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173040 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-12-03 23:08 EST ------- Also do you intend on submitting a fuse-encfs package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 04:09:06 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 23:09:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174879] Review Request: giFT (giftd) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512040409.jB4496CZ018171@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: giFT (giftd) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174879 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-12-03 23:08 EST ------- Closing due to Comment #1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 04:11:03 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 23:11:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173040] Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512040411.jB44B3nB018394@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173040 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-12-03 23:10 EST ------- Also don't forget to add the dist tag to the Release before this is imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 06:30:42 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 01:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168310] Review Request: swish-e In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512040630.jB46UgqO028006@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swish-e https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168310 ------- Additional Comments From bkyoung at users.sourceforge.net 2005-12-04 01:30 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: swish-e.spec.18 SRPM Name or Url: swish-e-2.4.2-18.fc4.src.rpm Sigh. Unfortunately, the blame for this fiasco rests squarely on my shoulders. Elliot cannot, and should not be required to, read the rules/procedures to every contributor. Fixed reported: /usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/SWISH/API/API.so: undefined symbol: SwishErrorsToStderr Fixed reported: API.so invalid standard RPATH error when rebuilt on system with installed /usr/lib/libswish-e.so -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 06:46:56 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 01:46:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512040646.jB46kuKB029026@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-04 01:46 EST ------- was trying to fix the usb problem but don't now where it come form: did: for i in `cat /etc/sysconfig/hwconf |grep "driver: .*-hcd"|cut -d" " -f2`;do echo $i; done and it prints: ohci-hcd ohci-hcd ehci-hcd this is what is done inside usb.ii (modprobe instead of echo) and then it mounts the usbfs and call udevstart... so it should work. the only thing that I can think of is that the script does not start at all... but how do Im check which scripts have been executed? is there any log for that or do I have to hack the scripts to get such a log? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From wtogami at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 07:00:30 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 02:00:30 -0500 Subject: Postgrey, Net::Server, IO::Multiplex, BerkleyDB Message-ID: <4392940E.3030704@redhat.com> http://isg.ee.ethz.ch/tools/postgrey/ Before I spend time packaging Postgrey and its perl module dependencies, has anyone already done this? Is anyone else interested in maintaining postgrey in Extras? I'm only interested in testing it and unsure yet if I will be using it in the long-term. Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 07:29:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 02:29:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174063] Review Request: cssed - css editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512040729.jB47T8m9031438@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - css editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174063 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at iagorubio.com 2005-12-04 02:29 EST ------- The requested changes are made but the package is not released yet, pending for further comments. The Source tag in the following spec is not valid yet. The changes have been commited to cssed cvs. Fixed issues: - Lines 74-78: this directory should be moved in %{_includedir}/cssed Fixed in spec and upstream package. - The spec in the src.rpm is named cssed-0.4.0.spec at the moment. Fixed. The source rpm rebuilds fine. The rpm package installs and uninstalls cleanly. The -devel package installs and uninstalls cleanly. The source rpm builds in mock. rpmlint only complains about missing docs in -devel. W: cssed-devel no-documentation http://iagorubio.com/fedora/cssed.spec http://iagorubio.com/fedora/cssed-0.4.1-0.src.rpm http://iagorubio.com/fedora/cssed-0.4.1.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 07:49:55 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 02:49:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168310] Review Request: swish-e In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512040749.jB47nttA000802@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swish-e https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168310 ------- Additional Comments From bkyoung at users.sourceforge.net 2005-12-04 02:49 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: swish-e.spec.19 SRPM Name or Url: swish-e-2.4.2-19.fc5.src.rpm While fixing 19.fc5, a lib path was incorrectly adjusted. This returns it to the correct value. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 08:46:10 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 03:46:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173040] Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512040846.jB48kATe007510@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173040 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-04 03:45 EST ------- valgrind should not be a problem; it is used for creating nice stacktraces only without adding library deps. But I never looked whether these stacktraces are working also on x86_64 and PPC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ville.skytta at iki.fi Sun Dec 4 09:09:49 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:09:49 +0200 Subject: Postgrey, Net::Server, IO::Multiplex, BerkleyDB In-Reply-To: <4392940E.3030704@redhat.com> References: <4392940E.3030704@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1133687389.16011.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 02:00 -0500, Warren Togami wrote: > http://isg.ee.ethz.ch/tools/postgrey/ > > Before I spend time packaging Postgrey and its perl module dependencies, > has anyone already done this? perl-Net-Server and perl-BerkeleyDB are already in Extras. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 09:48:21 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 04:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174063] Review Request: cssed - css editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512040948.jB49mLJa021625@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - css editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174063 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-04 04:48 EST ------- IMO, the devel package is useless, because the package doesn't ship the implementation corresponding to the API these headers specify. AFAIS, these headers actually are private headers and should not be installed (bug in Makefile.am) nor shipped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 10:02:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 05:02:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174486] Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512041002.jB4A2Ydk023162@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-04 05:02 EST ------- http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/libopensync.spec http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/libopensync-0.18-1.src.rpm Ok here you go... fixed BR and the non-conf. I don't think it should be noreplace so ignore this warning. For the last-changelog one: It is present but due to my lang mail/name combination in the next line which is ok. For the debuginfo stuff I don't think it is that important is it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ville.skytta at iki.fi Sun Dec 4 10:26:42 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 12:26:42 +0200 Subject: libapreq2 rebuild In-Reply-To: <1133664617.31342.0.camel@coyote.rexursive.com> References: <1133664617.31342.0.camel@coyote.rexursive.com> Message-ID: <1133692002.16011.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 13:50 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: > With new APR/APU and httpd now now in Rawhide, could someone push a > rebuild of libapreq2 in extras? I'm working on it, but it's bitten by #136009 and #174924; will wait for comments/resolutions to those first. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 11:00:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 06:00:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174063] Review Request: cssed - css editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512041100.jB4B0OCL029090@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - css editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174063 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at iagorubio.com 2005-12-04 06:00 EST ------- The devel package, is only required to build cssed plugins, The implementation in this case is the cssed executable itself. The headers distributed contains the API "exported" by the application. If to ship the devel package is a problem I can remove it from the spec file, quite easy. There's only a need to remove --with-plugins-headers from the %configure line and the related %package, %description and %files sections. The problem is it will be impossible to package the plugins as they could not be rebuilt in a system without the pkg-config file, and the headers contained in the devel package. The plugins are not included in cssed and are shipped as separate packages. Fair is to say that a couple of files distributed in this package have been deprecated and are shipped just for compatibility purposes. The amount of files needed to develop cssed plugins will be reduced to the plugin.h file and the scintilla headers in further releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Sun Dec 4 11:48:56 2005 From: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net (Nicolas Mailhot) Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 12:48:56 +0100 Subject: Postgrey, Net::Server, IO::Multiplex, BerkleyDB In-Reply-To: <4392940E.3030704@redhat.com> References: <4392940E.3030704@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1133696944.3532.12.camel@rousalka.dyndns.org> Le dimanche 04 d?cembre 2005 ? 02:00 -0500, Warren Togami a ?crit : > http://isg.ee.ethz.ch/tools/postgrey/ > > Before I spend time packaging Postgrey and its perl module dependencies, > has anyone already done this? I'd be grateful if you do IO::Multiplex, Net::Server does not need it when used with amavis but it seems that's not the case for all Net::Server users. Also it'd be great if someone could OK amavisd-new - it's been languishing for months in bugzilla, as far as I know all the reported problems have been fixed long ago. postfix + postgrey + amavis + spamassassin + clamav is a pretty standard antispam setup, I think freshrpms is using it on its ML. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 12:14:40 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 07:14:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512041214.jB4CEen8002697@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2005-12-04 07:14 EST ------- Now all the latest patches (from comments #91 and #95) are in. Thanks a lot for your help! I tried making a hard Fedora extras build (using 0.4.7), but Plague just tells me that "Job failed on arch x86_64". Since I don't have access to any x86_64 machine I have no way of doing any testing on this. The build process apparently chokes up on: Error: Missing Dependency: libdevmapper.so.1.01()(64bit) is needed by package device-mapper Error: Missing Dependency: libdevmapper.so.1.01(Base)(64bit) is needed by package device-mapper ...which doesn't make any sense to me whatsoever. Can someone please explain to me what's going wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 12:26:47 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 07:26:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512041226.jB4CQlDO003605@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2005-12-04 07:26 EST ------- Oh. There is now also an initng component in Fedora bugzilla. Maybe some of the type of stuff that has been mentioned above could be filed as bugs there instead from now on? And of course, the types of bugs that has nothing with the rpm but with upstreams code to do would be even nicer to have in upstreams bugzilla... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 12:31:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 07:31:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512041231.jB4CVYWn003917@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2005-12-04 07:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #94) > but how do Im check which scripts have been executed? is there any log for that > or do I have to hack the scripts to get such a log? Take a look at ngc. "ngc -h" will give you a nice list of commands, "ngc -s" gives an even nicer list of which daemons/services has been started and "ngc -L" gives a huge log with loads of crap that I don't understand anything of ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 17:42:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 12:42:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166255] Review Request: Sprog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512041742.jB4HgR0g024455@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Sprog https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166255 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2005-12-04 12:42 EST ------- Okay not quite 24 hours, but close. Sprog-0.14-5.fc5.src.rpm is approved for FE development. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From lfarkas at bppiac.hu Sun Dec 4 17:57:57 2005 From: lfarkas at bppiac.hu (Farkas Levente) Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:57:57 +0100 Subject: Postgrey, Net::Server, IO::Multiplex, BerkleyDB In-Reply-To: <4392940E.3030704@redhat.com> References: <4392940E.3030704@redhat.com> Message-ID: <43932E25.6080402@bppiac.hu> Warren Togami wrote: > http://isg.ee.ethz.ch/tools/postgrey/ > > Before I spend time packaging Postgrey and its perl module dependencies, > has anyone already done this? > > Is anyone else interested in maintaining postgrey in Extras? I'm only > interested in testing it and unsure yet if I will be using it in the > long-term. as you can read it on postgrey homepage i made rpms and probably will do so, but i'm not think about packaging it in extras: http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/ -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" From wtogami at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 18:13:53 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 13:13:53 -0500 Subject: Postgrey, Net::Server, IO::Multiplex, BerkleyDB In-Reply-To: <43932E25.6080402@bppiac.hu> References: <4392940E.3030704@redhat.com> <43932E25.6080402@bppiac.hu> Message-ID: <439331E1.90101@redhat.com> Farkas Levente wrote: > Warren Togami wrote: > >> http://isg.ee.ethz.ch/tools/postgrey/ >> >> Before I spend time packaging Postgrey and its perl module >> dependencies, has anyone already done this? >> >> Is anyone else interested in maintaining postgrey in Extras? I'm only >> interested in testing it and unsure yet if I will be using it in the >> long-term. > > > as you can read it on postgrey homepage i made rpms and probably will do > so, but i'm not think about packaging it in extras: > http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/ > Why not maintain it in Extras? Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 18:44:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:44:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174063] Review Request: cssed - css editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512041844.jB4IiSIY029699@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - css editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174063 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-04 13:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > The devel package, is only required to build cssed plugins, The implementation > in this case is the cssed executable itself. > > The headers distributed contains the API "exported" by the application. Apparently wrong. Proof: document.h is being installed and declares a lot of functions. None of them is exported from any binary. > If to ship the devel package is a problem I can remove it from the spec file, > quite easy. Presence of useless files is not an actual problem, it's the fact they are meaningless and that your package's plugin API is a very doubtful (IMSNHO: bad) design. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 18:55:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:55:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174944] New: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174944 Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://0pointer.de/lennart/projects/polypaudio OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/polypaudio.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/polypaudio-0.7-1.src.rpm Description: polypaudio is a sound server for Linux and other Unix like operating systems. It is intended to be an improved drop-in replacement for the Enlightened Sound Daemon (ESOUND). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 18:56:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:56:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512041856.jB4Iu0VZ030367@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |174944 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 19:00:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 14:00:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174944] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512041900.jB4J0wgd030656@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174944 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2005-12-04 14:00 EST ------- Is not this a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174866 already submitted two days ago? I think that you know who did it first. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 19:50:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 14:50:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174944] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512041950.jB4JoVIN002543@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174944 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-04 14:50 EST ------- Appears so, closing. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 174866 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 19:50:43 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 14:50:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512041950.jB4JohvT002585@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174866 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-04 14:50 EST ------- *** Bug 174944 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 20:00:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 15:00:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174063] Review Request: cssed - css editor and validator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512042000.jB4K0NhB003783@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cssed - css editor and validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174063 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at iagorubio.com 2005-12-04 15:00 EST ------- > Apparently wrong. > Proof: document.h is being installed and declares a lot of functions. Those are some of the deprecated functions shipped for backward compatibility I mentioned in my comment #10. http://cssed.sourceforge.net/plugins-doc/accesing_docs.html > None of them is exported from any binary. As you know, G_MODULE_EXPORT can be considered boilerplate on Unix and Linux systems as it's a macro that expands to nothing. Only on Windows it have a meaning as it expands to __declspec(dllexport). So this functions can still be accessed by Linux, Unix and OsX plugins despite the lack of the G_MODULE_EXPORT macro. This file is here for those in-house developers that used them in their plugins, to give them a time frame to change those deprecated functions. No cssed plugin uses any of the deprecated interface functions. > Presence of useless files is not an actual problem, it's the fact they are > meaningless and that your package's plugin API is a very doubtful (IMSNHO: > bad) design. Well, I cannot argue about that with you, and it's just the second release of cssed exporting an API so it's sure it's not mature. In fact in the documentation it's stated it's a draft. http://cssed.sourceforge.net/plugins-doc/introduction.html#whos_this_for But please let me point that you're judging a set of deprecated functions as part of the API, and you're not taking into account when you stated they're useless, that it have its uses for the reasons I stated above. The actual API is contained in plugin.h. cssedwindow.h only contains definitions and the other files - taking out scintilla headers - are the same case as document.h. As I said, I can take out the devel package - so take out all plugins if they're a concern - or clean up the include directory to delete the deprecated functions. If any other solution is required please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 20:54:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 15:54:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174952] New: Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174952 Summary: Review Request: lightning - GNU Lightning Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/lightning OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: Jochen at herr-schmitt.de QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/lightning/lightning.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/lightning/lightning-1.2-1.spec Description: GNU lightning is a library to aid in making portable programms that compiles assembly code at run time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 20:54:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 15:54:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512042054.jB4KsVSl006657@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 Jochen at herr-schmitt.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |174952 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 20:59:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 15:59:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512042059.jB4Kxqlf006978@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2005-12-04 15:59 EST ------- When I make a aclocal as described in the error message I got a strange error message which refer to a package called lightning. So I have decide to create a new package called lightning, which will be a build require for gnu-smalltalk. You may find the review request for this package on bug #163776 Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 21:02:13 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 16:02:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512042102.jB4L2DDl007168@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2005-12-04 16:02 EST ------- Correction: the Bug number is #174952. Sorry for any inconvinience. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 21:16:44 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 16:16:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512042116.jB4LGiUN007865@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2005-12-04 16:16 EST ------- I have uploaded the packages which refer to lightning to: SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnu-smalltalk/gnu-smalltalk-2.2-3.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnu-smalltalk/gnu-smalltalk.spec Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From jpmahowald at gmail.com Sun Dec 4 21:21:35 2005 From: jpmahowald at gmail.com (John Mahowald) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 15:21:35 -0600 Subject: smeg (alacarte) unmaintained for FC3, will request removal from repo if not fixed Message-ID: <3ea997540512041321l4b29d2edyfe4441c50d2676d9@mail.gmail.com> Without a FC3 machine I'm not going to get around to fixing bug 170147 among others. If no one comes up with a fix I'm going to request a removal of smeg FC3 branch. Sorry FC3 users, but I'd rather have nothing than a broken version. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 4 21:37:48 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 16:37:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512042137.jB4Lbms3009259@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2005-12-04 16:37 EST ------- Lightning seems to be used for jit compiling. I once compiled gst with jit enabled and this would not work. In your spec file, there is --enable-jit to the configure script (in any way a package would not be required to enable the jit). Thus there should not be a requirement on lightning. I think you should patch the configure script and Makefile.in directly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 04:08:01 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 23:08:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169210] Review Request: xnee: recorder and player of X actions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512050408.jB5481UL004834@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xnee: recorder and player of X actions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169210 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-04 23:07 EST ------- Ping, interest expressed on #fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From wcooley at nakedape.cc Mon Dec 5 04:18:10 2005 From: wcooley at nakedape.cc (Wil Cooley) Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 20:18:10 -0800 Subject: Postgrey, Net::Server, IO::Multiplex, BerkleyDB In-Reply-To: <4392940E.3030704@redhat.com> References: <4392940E.3030704@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1133756291.24307.18.camel@denk.nakedape.cc> On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 02:00 -0500, Warren Togami wrote: > http://isg.ee.ethz.ch/tools/postgrey/ > > Before I spend time packaging Postgrey and its perl module dependencies, > has anyone already done this? I have, but for EL3: http://ftp.nakedape.cc/nakedape/rhel3/rpm/postgrey/ All of my dependencies are met through my own repo, RPMforge or the dist, so it shouldn't be too bad on Fedora. Hm, I guess I'm a a couple minor revisions behind. > Is anyone else interested in maintaining postgrey in Extras? I'm only > interested in testing it and unsure yet if I will be using it in the > long-term. It's a nice package, although I've considered using SQLgrey instead, so I could keep the lists in MySQL, along with my SA Bayes and whitelists. I'm not sure about volunteering to maintain it for Fedora, since I run most of my servers on RHEL/CentOS for longevity. Wil -- Wil Cooley wcooley at nakedape.cc Naked Ape Consulting http://nakedape.cc * * * * Linux, UNIX, Networking and Security Solutions * * * * -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 06:25:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 01:25:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169754] Review Request: tclxml - XML parsing package for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512050625.jB56P8uL014797@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclxml - XML parsing package for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169754 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2005-12-05 01:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > %post -p /sbin/ldconfig > > %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig > > No libs are installed in the dynamic linker's default paths, so that's not needed. > > Is there a good reason to ship the static libraries in -devel? One of the packages that I'm still working on is the TclPro wrapper, which wraps Tcl applications and their associated library files into a single application. This wrapper can make use of static libraries for C-based extensions to build a 'big tcl' shell with the various extensions statically linked. This is the only reason I like to include the static libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 06:57:01 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 01:57:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173548] Review Request: xfce4-modemlights-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512050657.jB56v1R8016960@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-modemlights-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173548 luya256 at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From luya256 at yahoo.com 2005-12-05 01:56 EST ------- Set to FE-ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 07:15:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 02:15:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173667] Review Request: xfce4-showdesktop-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512050715.jB57FYMI018112@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-showdesktop-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173667 luya256 at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From luya256 at yahoo.com 2005-12-05 02:15 EST ------- Set to FE-ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 07:28:30 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 02:28:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512050728.jB57SUA0019525@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2005-12-05 02:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #96) > Error: Missing Dependency: libdevmapper.so.1.01()(64bit) is needed by package > device-mapper > Error: Missing Dependency: libdevmapper.so.1.01(Base)(64bit) is needed by > package device-mapper It seems this wasn't my fault after all (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174946). I guess I'll have to try again when I get the time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 08:05:11 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 03:05:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512050805.jB585BZr023660@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-05 03:04 EST ------- Daniel, I see you have imported this package into CVS despite the facts this package has NOT yet been APPROVED nor is it being reviewed. I don't know how FESCO wants to proceed with this, but IMO, you have violated the rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 08:38:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 03:38:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512050838.jB58cVna026495@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2005-12-05 03:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #100) > Daniel, I see you have imported this package into CVS despite the facts this > package has NOT yet been APPROVED nor is it being reviewed. > I don't know how FESCO wants to proceed with this, but IMO, you have violated > the rules. Doh! I thought that Gauret approving me for cvsextras meant that the package was approved. How do I know when it is approved? Since I don't know anything about these things I'm just following the directives at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors and step 7 says that "When the package is approved by the reviewer, that person will then sponsor you". If I'm doing anything wrong here, can someone please fix the text in the wiki? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 08:55:51 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 03:55:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173111] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512050855.jB58tpS9028069@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173111 ------- Additional Comments From luya256 at yahoo.com 2005-12-05 03:55 EST ------- Patches works great. Unfortunately, I have hard time to figure out about symlink even with theses under %install: mkdir -p ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}{%{_bindir}} ln -sf %{_libdir}/%{name}/%{name} ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_bindir}/%{name} rpmlint will give this message even though this line show symbolic link. Is rpmlint wrong or buggy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 09:13:55 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 04:13:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512050913.jB59DtPs030203@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-05 04:13 EST ------- Yes, it looks like it's partly my mistake here, I sponsored you before the package was actually approved (I think I've seen it done before, but anyway). I've checked that the tarball is identical to upstream's, so no security risk involved. Just don't request build before this package is actually approved (which means I explicitely say I approve the package, see bug 172400 for example) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 09:28:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 04:28:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512050928.jB59SI5L031813@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2005-12-05 04:28 EST ------- actually from tracking upstream cvs it seems that alot things are beeing fixed in the next release. some of the x86_64 warnings have been tackled already. i hope it will cure the x86_64 segfault probs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 09:46:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 04:46:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512050946.jB59kO55001394@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2005-12-05 04:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #102) > Yes, it looks like it's partly my mistake here, I sponsored you before the > package was actually approved (I think I've seen it done before, but anyway). > I've checked that the tarball is identical to upstream's, so no security risk > involved. Just don't request build before this package is actually approved I already tried building yesterday. The build failed though (see comment #96 above), so there is no initng out in the open. > (which means I explicitely say I approve the package, see bug 172400 for example) Ok. Thanks for the explanation ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 09:47:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 04:47:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512050947.jB59lqf5001760@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2005-12-05 04:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #103) > actually from tracking upstream cvs it seems that alot things are beeing fixed > in the next release. some of the x86_64 warnings have been tackled already. i > hope it will cure the x86_64 segfault probs. Yes, Enrico has done a really great work trying to solve x86_64 stuff. Thanks a lot Enrico! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 09:51:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 04:51:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512050951.jB59pbDm002367@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-05 04:51 EST ------- Pushing package back to FE-NEW, because it isn't assigned to formal reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 11:14:40 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 06:14:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512051114.jB5BEeX4012995@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2005-12-05 06:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #105) > (In reply to comment #103) > > actually from tracking upstream cvs it seems that alot things are beeing > fixed > > in the next release. some of the x86_64 warnings have been tackled already. i > > hope it will cure the x86_64 segfault probs. > Yes, Enrico has done a really great work trying to solve x86_64 stuff. Thanks a > lot Enrico! i am curious if the latest state will start up just fine but i cant try again before weekend cause i am not at home at my x86_64 box. ;( I hope people keep an eye on it before releasing the package to the wild ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From lfarkas at bppiac.hu Mon Dec 5 12:45:45 2005 From: lfarkas at bppiac.hu (Farkas Levente) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:45:45 +0100 Subject: Postgrey, Net::Server, IO::Multiplex, BerkleyDB In-Reply-To: <439331E1.90101@redhat.com> References: <4392940E.3030704@redhat.com> <43932E25.6080402@bppiac.hu> <439331E1.90101@redhat.com> Message-ID: <43943679.7020406@bppiac.hu> Warren Togami wrote: > Farkas Levente wrote: > >> Warren Togami wrote: >> >>> http://isg.ee.ethz.ch/tools/postgrey/ >>> >>> Before I spend time packaging Postgrey and its perl module >>> dependencies, has anyone already done this? >>> >>> Is anyone else interested in maintaining postgrey in Extras? I'm >>> only interested in testing it and unsure yet if I will be using it in >>> the long-term. >> >> >> >> as you can read it on postgrey homepage i made rpms and probably will >> do so, but i'm not think about packaging it in extras: >> http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/ >> > > Why not maintain it in Extras? all of our server are centos, unfortunately (even if i'm not like it) extras not support other distros (even not rhel, centos packages). but if you sponsor me i can maintain in extras. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" From fedora at camperquake.de Mon Dec 5 12:46:46 2005 From: fedora at camperquake.de (Ralf Ertzinger) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:46:46 +0100 Subject: Postgrey, Net::Server, IO::Multiplex, BerkleyDB In-Reply-To: <43943679.7020406@bppiac.hu> References: <4392940E.3030704@redhat.com> <43932E25.6080402@bppiac.hu> <439331E1.90101@redhat.com> <43943679.7020406@bppiac.hu> Message-ID: <20051205124646.GB19731@ryoko.camperquake.de> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 01:45:45PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote: > all of our server are centos, unfortunately (even if i'm not like it) > extras not support other distros (even not rhel, centos packages). > but if you sponsor me i can maintain in extras. There are kind people around who rebuild extras for centos. From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Mon Dec 5 12:57:56 2005 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:57:56 +0100 Subject: How to remove a package from FE (devel) Message-ID: <43943954.5040005@hhs.nl> Hi all, I packaged a special (newer) version of libgsf called libgsf113 for goffice, whic in turn was needed for gnumeric / gnucash. Core now has upgraded to the newer version. I'll ask (bugzilla) core to add an Obsoletes libgsf113, but do how I remove the package from the extras devel repo, and what should I do with bugzilla component (0 entries) and CVS? Regards, Hans From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 14:45:42 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:45:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512051445.jB5EjgRC002928@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-05 09:45 EST ------- > - there was some openswan-related conf.samples in the previous release. Don't > get rid of them completely, it can be useful to add these examples into the > %doc ... (as ./samples-ipsec.d/*) No more needed, as new openswan-2.4.4 already include it in its /etc/ipsec.d/examples . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 14:51:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:51:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170131] Review Request: php-extras - Additional PHP modules from the standard PHP distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512051451.jB5EpSjp003454@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-extras - Additional PHP modules from the standard PHP distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170131 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-05 09:51 EST ------- ping -f Matthias :| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Mon Dec 5 15:57:13 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:57:13 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051205155713.490018013@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 2 gnupg2-1.9.19-8.fc3 libksba-0.9.13-2.fc3 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 16:13:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 11:13:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166796] Review Request: cmucl: CMU Common Lisp compiler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512051613.jB5GDwEZ015072@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cmucl: CMU Common Lisp compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166796 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: cmucl-19c- |Review Request: cmucl: CMU |1.pre1: CMU Common Lisp |Common Lisp compiler |compiler | ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-05 11:13 EST ------- * Fri Dec 02 2005 Rex Dieter 19c-2 - 19c (final) Spec Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/fedora/SPECS/cmucl-19c-2.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/fedora/all/SRPMS.stable/cmucl-19c-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 16:34:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 11:34:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512051634.jB5GYPo1017428@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-05 11:33 EST ------- can somebody point me to the most recent srpm or spec file (+tarball) so that I can test it again (on x86_64) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 17:33:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:33:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512051733.jB5HXOeg027033@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-05 12:32 EST ------- ok I found it... I tryed with the lastest svn build an got this problems: * it adds deamon/sshd to my default.runlevel file (sshd is disabled) * it comlains about deamon/httpd does not exists this is likly because httpd.i looks like that: ----- daemon daemon/apache { need = system/initial system/mountfs net/lo; use = daemon/sshd daemon/mysql daemon/postgres system/netmount; require_network; script daemon = { /usr/sbin/httpd; /bin/sleep 1 } pid_file = /var/run/httpd.pid; } -- but it should be -- daemon daemon/httpd { need = system/initial system/mountfs net/lo; use = daemon/sshd daemon/mysql daemon/postgres system/netmount; require_network; script daemon = { /usr/sbin/httpd; /bin/sleep 1 } pid_file = /var/run/httpd.pid; } --- * it hangs after mounting sys (don't now if its related to this warings or not) I will try again with the corrected file (httpd.i) and see if it boots if yes I will submit a patch upstream if not I will fil a bug. what should I do about the sshd thing? If I decide not to start a service why does gen_system_runlevel pics it up? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 17:35:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:35:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512051735.jB5HZkqf027474@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-05 12:35 EST ------- the cause for the usb problem I mentioned in comment #94 was that system/usb was not in system.runlevel after adding it in system.runlevel usb worked fine (with the 0.4.7 build) will now try svn again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Mon Dec 5 17:41:41 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:41:41 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051205174141.5AE778013@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 9 balsa-2.3.7-2.fc4 gambas-1.0.13-3.fc4 gnupg2-1.9.19-8.fc4 krecipes-0.9.1-1.fc4 libesmtp-1.0.3r1-4 libksba-0.9.13-2.fc4 perl-DBIx-DBSchema-0.28-1.fc4 perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon-0.53-1.fc4 python-kid-0.8-1.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 17:42:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:42:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512051742.jB5Hg8kH028316@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-05 12:41 EST ------- ok the change I made fixed the apache problem .... but it still hangs on or after mounting sysfs mounting sysfs as /sys (and nothing happens) no disk ativity but numlock still works -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Mon Dec 5 18:05:31 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:05:31 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051205180531.9C0C58013@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 8 freeciv-2.0.7-4.fc5 krecipes-0.9.1-2.fc5 liferea-1.0-0.3.rc4.fc5 lrmi-0.9-2.fc5 perl-DBIx-DBSchema-0.28-1.fc5 perl-Locale-Maketext-Lexicon-0.53-1.fc5 sbcl-0.9.7-1.fc5 xemacs-21.4.18-2.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 18:06:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:06:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171334] Review Request: nsd - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512051806.jB5I6dGJ000324@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nsd - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171334 paul at xtdnet.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: nsd - |Review Request: nsd - ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2005-12-05 13:06 EST ------- nsd 2.3.2 was released today. I've upgraded the rpms and spec files. - upgraded to 2.3.2 - no longer run chkconfig upon install in the spec file (FE policy) - change nsd.init to not run on install (FE policy) ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/nsd/binaries/fedora/4/nsd.spec ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/nsd/binaries/fedora/4/nsd-2.3.2-1.src.rpm binaries for fc3 (intel) and fc4 (intel, x86_64) are available as yum repository at ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/nsd/binaries/fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 18:16:32 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:16:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512051816.jB5IGWl6001368@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2005-12-05 13:16 EST ------- Correct. After talking to Jacco de Leeuw, we decided to move them from the l2tpd rpm to the openswan rpm, since they are configuration files for openswan when using l2tpd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 18:29:51 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 13:29:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174278] Review Request: tcldom - XML DOM bindings for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512051829.jB5ITp4F002981@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcldom - XML DOM bindings for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174278 Bug 174278 depends on bug 169754, which changed state. Bug 169754 Summary: Review Request: tclxml - XML parsing package for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169754 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bojan at rexursive.com Mon Dec 5 22:16:49 2005 From: bojan at rexursive.com (Bojan Smojver) Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 09:16:49 +1100 Subject: libapreq2 rebuild Message-ID: <20051206091649.0v9dan0e80ggs0o4@imp.rexursive.com> Quoting Ville Skytt? : > I'm working on it, but it's bitten by #136009 and #174924; will wait for > comments/resolutions to those first. Yeah, I had issues of similar nature in mod_spin as well. It seems that when you're shipping a library with your own piece of software, the RPATHs get encoded (sometimes as build directories, sometimes as standard paths) and the build fails. So, I'm doing some ugly sed-ing in my Makefile.am to get rid of that: http://www.rexursive.com/svn/mod_spin/trunk/src/Makefile.am -- Bojan From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 23:25:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 18:25:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175047] New: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.niemueller.de/software/patches/networkmanager .php OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at niemueller.de QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.niemueller.de/software/patches/NetworkManager-openvpn.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.niemueller.de/software/patches/NetworkManager-openvpn-0.3-1.src.rpm Description: This package contains software for integrating the OpenVPN VPN software with NetworkManager and the GNOME desktop This package is based on the existing NetworkManager-vpnc package. I'm the author of the NM-OpenVPN integration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 5 23:25:19 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 18:25:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512052325.jB5NPJUq026694@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 redhat-bugzilla at niemueller.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175047 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 6 00:12:47 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 19:12:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512060012.jB60ClQ0032467@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at niemueller.de 2005-12-05 19:12 EST ------- I should have mentioned that this is my first package for Fedora Extras and I'm seeking a "sponsor". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From jspaleta at gmail.com Tue Dec 6 01:14:40 2005 From: jspaleta at gmail.com (Jeff Spaleta) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:14:40 -0500 Subject: How to remove a package from FE (devel) In-Reply-To: <43943954.5040005@hhs.nl> References: <43943954.5040005@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <604aa7910512051714m5c7ef00cn28648e09095967a4@mail.gmail.com> On 12/5/05, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi all, > > I packaged a special (newer) version of libgsf called libgsf113 for > goffice, whic in turn was needed for gnumeric / gnucash. Core now has > upgraded to the newer version. > > I'll ask (bugzilla) core to add an Obsoletes libgsf113, but do how I > remove the package from the extras devel repo, and what should I do with > bugzilla component (0 entries) and CVS? This sort of a situation where you conflict with Core's update path should be avoided. it would have been best if you had communicated with the Core maintainer of libgst before you went ahead and made libgsf113 in fe-devel. Did you try to contact the Core maintainer of libgsf before deciding to create this additional package? Since this only affects development I'm not sure its appropriate to have Core place an obsoletes, but that's something for Core to determine. -jef From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 6 03:16:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 22:16:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168310] Review Request: swish-e In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512060316.jB63GnYs017466@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swish-e https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168310 ------- Additional Comments From bkyoung at users.sourceforge.net 2005-12-05 22:16 EST ------- #60 was more complicated. After the changes, the paths had to be adjusted, yes, but PERL5LIB and LD_LIBRARY_PATH had to be re-added. This does not affect runtime. The 20.fc5 package fails check-rpaths if the spec sed LD_RUN_PATH line is commented out with/without Swish-e installed. Added a swish-e-default sub-package, which helps for testing purposes (needed!). Perhaps a bit much for Extras? Thanks to the fedora-devtool guys for tools to catch these problems. Because of all these minute changes, I've verified the package yet once again: PackagingGuidelines * Normal package naming ok. * Upstream name contains dash '-', but ok. * Addon Perl sub-packages match CPAN, but some use all capitols. * Doc subpackage -doc ok. * spec file name ok. * Version matches upstream. * %{?dist} used correctly in Release. * Legal: Includes OSI/GPL. * No Packager, Vendor, or Copyright tags. * Good buildroot tag. * Requires look good. Patch requires specific libxml2. * BuildRequires looks good. * Summaries/Descriptions ok. American English and Spelling. * Spec file ASCII. * -doc sub-package. Group: Documentation. * Includes libraries. * No .la or static libs. * Devel subpackage used. * %config(noreplace) used. * Macros use ok. * RPM_BUILD_ROOT/RPM_OPT_FLAGS variable style. * Uses %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} instead of make %{?_smp_mflags} * Conditional dependencies not required. * Not relocatable. * Content ok (documentation). ReviewGuidelines * MUST Items * Rpmlint ok. * Name ok. * Spec ok. * Packageguidelines ok. * License OSI/GPL. * License in doc of primary package. * License field matches included license. * Spec file in American English. * Spec file not a Obfuscated Code Contest candidate. * UNABLE TO VERIFY MD5SUM UPSTREAM. * Build on FC4/FC5-test1 i386 * No dups. * Good perms. * %clean ok. * Macros ok. * Content ok and code ok. * Large doc => -doc package. * No runtime files in -doc. * Headers in -devel subpackage. * No pkgconfig used. * Devel contains .so. * All subpackages require versioned base as dependency. * No .la or static libs. * No gui apps. * SHOULD Items. * Package tests properly on i386. OTHER * Proper use of ldconfig * Package owns all files/directories it should * Owns all directories it uses * Builds with package already installed. * Build test ok with package already installed. * Builds without package installed. * Build test okay without package installed. Definition of testing the package: After build, then package install: cd BUILD/swish-e-2.4.2/perl perl t/test.t echo $? == 0 Configuring swish-e-default according to README.default lynx url/cgi-bin/swish.cgi runs and entering a search term "swish" returns a results list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Tue Dec 6 07:25:56 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 08:25:56 +0100 Subject: rpms/linphone/devel linphone-1.1.0-Werror.patch, NONE, 1.1 linphone-1.1.0-ortp.patch, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 linphone.spec, 1.13, 1.14 sources, 1.3, 1.4 linphone-1.0.1-ortp.patch, 1.1, NONE In-Reply-To: <200512060017.jB60HfMD018257@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> References: <200512060017.jB60HfMD018257@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1133853957.10823.36.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 19:17 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > Author: ivazquez > > Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/linphone/devel > --- NEW FILE linphone-1.1.0-ortp.patch --- > --- linphone-1.1.0/gnome/Makefile.in.ortp 2005-08-24 18:45:55.000000000 -0400 > +++ linphone-1.1.0/gnome/Makefile.in 2005-12-05 17:14:02.000000000 -0500 > @@ -343,8 +343,7 @@ > @BUILD_GNOME_TRUE at INCLUDES = \ > @BUILD_GNOME_TRUE@ -I$(top_srcdir)\ > @BUILD_GNOME_TRUE@ -I$(top_srcdir)/intl \ > - at BUILD_GNOME_TRUE@ -I$(top_srcdir)/oRTP/src \ > - at BUILD_GNOME_TRUE@ -I$(top_srcdir)/oRTP/ \ > + at BUILD_GNOME_TRUE@ -I$(includedir)/ortp/ You are introducing a bug: -I$(includedir) violates the autotools' working principles. The autotools' $(includedir) is an installation destination directory, not a source directory. Ralf From ville.skytta at iki.fi Tue Dec 6 07:51:58 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 09:51:58 +0200 Subject: How to remove a package from FE (devel) In-Reply-To: <43943954.5040005@hhs.nl> References: <43943954.5040005@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <1133855518.23028.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 13:57 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > do how I remove the package from the extras devel repo Request removal in the appropriate Extras/FC*Status Wiki page, in this case http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/FC5Status > , and what should I do with bugzilla component (0 entries) Remove the package from owners.list in CVS. I'm not sure if that actually results in removal of the Bugzilla component though. > and CVS? Just "cvs rm" all files (including .cvsignore) and commit. Or see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 6 11:16:48 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 06:16:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512061116.jB6BGmZO007629@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2005-12-06 06:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #109) > what should I do about the sshd thing? > If I decide not to start a service why does gen_system_runlevel pics it up? Mainly because gen_system_runlevel is a bug cludge. I've now fixed this particular bug in svn. (In reply to comment #110) > the cause for the usb problem I mentioned in comment #94 was that system/usb > was not in system.runlevel This is also fixed in svn, gen_system_runlevel now puts system/usb in system.runlevel per default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 6 12:13:06 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 07:13:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174546] Review Request: trac In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512061213.jB6CD6NP014937@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174546 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2005-12-06 07:12 EST ------- Spec file and SRPM updated to 0.9.2: - fixes SQL Injection Vulnerability in ticket search module. - fixes broken ticket email notifications. Spec Name or Url: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/trac/trac.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/trac/trac-0.9.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From thomas at apestaart.org Tue Dec 6 12:59:38 2005 From: thomas at apestaart.org (Thomas Vander Stichele) Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 13:59:38 +0100 Subject: repository breakage In-Reply-To: <1133036850.17662.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1132989961.10892.85.camel@locolhost.localdomain> <1132990757.28831.43.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1133007783.5112.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1133016971.17474.6.camel@cutter> <1133036850.17662.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1133873979.3161.19.camel@thomas.amantes> Hi, > > So if yum updates the other packages and completes its operation, but > > doesn't error out, how does the average user know that anything went > > wrong? > > > > And if they don't know that something went wrong, then how will they > > know if they missed an update? yum could still error out, but at least complete the upgrade for all packages that it does have a clean resolution for. I really don't see why the packages that can be upgraded correctly have to wait until the user manually resolves some obscure problem - especially given that from the error output it isn't necessarily easy to figure out how to resolve the problem. So if you feel erroring out is important, that's fine - but I see no harm at all in upgrading everything else. > They'd need to first figure out what are the packages that are causing > their transaction to fail or from which repository are they from, then > issue the update again with proper --exclude and/or --disablerepo > switches. Don't you think this is a major hurdle in this target group > of "most" or "extremely average" end users? +1 I don't think we're doing users a favour by asking them to manually resolve some edge problem and not upgrade anything for them until they do so. Thomas Dave/Dina : future TV today ! - http://www.davedina.org/ <-*- thomas (dot) apestaart (dot) org -*-> cos when i needed someone you left me floored the feeling is gone i can't let go you know that i'd change if i had the love it takes <-*- thomas (at) apestaart (dot) org -*-> URGent, best radio on the net - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.fm/ From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Tue Dec 6 12:26:44 2005 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 13:26:44 +0100 Subject: How to remove a package from FE (devel) In-Reply-To: <604aa7910512051714m5c7ef00cn28648e09095967a4@mail.gmail.com> References: <43943954.5040005@hhs.nl> <604aa7910512051714m5c7ef00cn28648e09095967a4@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <43958384.3000803@hhs.nl> Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 12/5/05, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I packaged a special (newer) version of libgsf called libgsf113 for >> goffice, whic in turn was needed for gnumeric / gnucash. Core now has >> upgraded to the newer version. >> >> I'll ask (bugzilla) core to add an Obsoletes libgsf113, but do how I >> remove the package from the extras devel repo, and what should I do with >> bugzilla component (0 entries) and CVS? > > This sort of a situation where you conflict with Core's update path > should be avoided. it would have been best if you had communicated > with the Core maintainer of libgst before you went ahead and made > libgsf113 in fe-devel. Did you try to contact the Core maintainer of > libgsf before deciding to create this additional package? > Yes I did communicate with Core, and the Core developer was aware of this extras packages, also it does not conflict since it install the newer version in a separate prefix. Actually THE core developer was not planning on shipping this version for a while (its an unstable version) but A core developer decided to bump it up anyway. Regards, Hans From rdieter at math.unl.edu Tue Dec 6 14:15:38 2005 From: rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter) Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 08:15:38 -0600 Subject: Package ... enqued. (However, no Jod ID was provided...) Message-ID: Uh oh: $ make build Package ... enqueued. (However, no Job ID was provided in the time required) $ date Tue Dec 6 08:15:22 CST 2005 -- Rex From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 6 14:19:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:19:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512061419.jB6EJdNM031143@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 jorton at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jorton at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2005-12-06 09:19 EST ------- The module license is not ideal (w.r.t GPL/ASL 2.0 incompatibility) otherwise looks fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From jspaleta at gmail.com Tue Dec 6 14:22:56 2005 From: jspaleta at gmail.com (Jeff Spaleta) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:22:56 -0500 Subject: How to remove a package from FE (devel) In-Reply-To: <43958384.3000803@hhs.nl> References: <43943954.5040005@hhs.nl> <604aa7910512051714m5c7ef00cn28648e09095967a4@mail.gmail.com> <43958384.3000803@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <604aa7910512060622j1beb985eu779e8b09a4efc98@mail.gmail.com> On 12/6/05, Hans de Goede wrote: > also it does not conflict since it install the > newer version in a separate prefix. ah sorry I should have actually checked that. -jef From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 6 14:47:21 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512061447.jB6ElLXG002696@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2005-12-06 09:47 EST ------- I've made a few cosmetic changes to the package: http://linux.duke.edu/~icon/misc/fe/mod_evasive.spec http://linux.duke.edu/~icon/misc/fe/mod_evasive-1.10.1-1.src.rpm * Tue Dec 06 2005 Konstantin Ryabitsev - 1.10.1-1 - Cleaning up description - Cleaning up install - Slight modification to default config (add DOSWhitelist entries) - Disttagging - Adding test.pl to docs If I can get it approved, I'll finish up the process of adding it to extras. (PS: Not much I can do about the license. :)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 6 16:38:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:38:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512061638.jB6GcVxc024534@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2005-12-06 11:38 EST ------- I built the RPM in mock on a system running -devel and tried to connect to a server running on FC4. It would seem that the 2.1 version of OpenVPN that is in -devel extras is turning on "--redirect-gateway" by default, which is DEFINITELY not what I want. I have verified that the server is not configured to send redirect-gateway and the --redirect-gateway is not defined on the OpenVPN command line invoked by NetworkManager. Is there some way to disable this behavior? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From dcbw at redhat.com Tue Dec 6 18:18:36 2005 From: dcbw at redhat.com (Dan Williams) Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 13:18:36 -0500 Subject: Package ... enqued. (However, no Jod ID was provided...) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1133893116.2765.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 08:15 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Uh oh: > > $ make build > Package ... enqueued. (However, no Job ID was provided in the time > required) > > $ date > Tue Dec 6 08:15:22 CST 2005 Kicked. As an update, I'm distilling a testcase for python+SSL that exhibits the problem with multiple ACK packets that iptables on the builders doesn't like. I believe that's the cause of this hang in the build server. Dan From fedora-extras at adslpipe.co.uk Tue Dec 6 19:53:49 2005 From: fedora-extras at adslpipe.co.uk (Andy Burns) Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 19:53:49 +0000 Subject: pgadmin in FC5/extras Message-ID: <1133898829.4677.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Hi, I've got postgresql 8.1 installed OK on FC5t5 (well rawhide) and wanted to install pgadmin III to go along with it. I tried using yum, but it can't solve all dependencies, looks like it needs rebuilding to pick up different .so names? Also is it possible that extras might be updated to pgAdmin III v1.4.0 which I believe is best to make use of the new 8.x features? # yum install pgadmin3 Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package pgadmin3.i386 0:1.0.2-5 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libwx_gtk2_xrc-2.4.so.0(WXGTK2_2.4) for package: pgadmin3 --> Processing Dependency: libwx_gtk2-2.4.so.0 for package: pgadmin3 --> Processing Dependency: libcrypto.so.5 for package: pgadmin3 --> Processing Dependency: libwx_gtk2_stc-2.4.so.0 for package: pgadmin3 --> Processing Dependency: libwx_gtk2_stc-2.4.so.0(WXGTK2_2.4) for package: pgadmin3 --> Processing Dependency: libwx_gtk2-2.4.so.0(WXGTK2_2.4) for package: pgadmin3--> Processing Dependency: libwx_gtk2_xrc-2.4.so.0 for package: pgadmin3 --> Processing Dependency: libssl.so.5 for package: pgadmin3 --> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes. --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package wxGTK2-stc.i386 0:2.4.2-12 set to be updated ---> Package wxGTK2-xrc.i386 0:2.4.2-12 set to be updated ---> Package wxGTK2.i386 0:2.4.2-12 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: wxGTK-common = 2.4.2-12 for package: wxGTK2 --> Processing Dependency: libcrypto.so.5 for package: pgadmin3 --> Processing Dependency: libssl.so.5 for package: pgadmin3 --> Restarting Dependency Resolution with new changes. --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package wxGTK-common.i386 0:2.4.2-12 set to be updated --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libcrypto.so.5 for package: pgadmin3 --> Processing Dependency: libssl.so.5 for package: pgadmin3 --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: libcrypto.so.5 is needed by package pgadmin3 Error: Missing Dependency: libssl.so.5 is needed by package pgadmin3 From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 6 19:53:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:53:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174783] Review Request: gruler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512061953.jB6Jr9pw026654@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gruler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174783 ------- Additional Comments From adrian at lisas.de 2005-12-06 14:52 EST ------- Could you please offer a link to the new SRPM, update the changelog and bump the version. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 6 19:56:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:56:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173080] Review Request: fdupes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512061956.jB6JuRXh027779@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fdupes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173080 ------- Additional Comments From adrian at lisas.de 2005-12-06 14:56 EST ------- I cannot find this in the development tree. Have you not requested a build in the devel tree? If this has been built successfully then please close this bug according to the documentation in the wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ivazquez at ivazquez.net Tue Dec 6 20:06:03 2005 From: ivazquez at ivazquez.net (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams) Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 15:06:03 -0500 Subject: pgadmin in FC5/extras In-Reply-To: <1133898829.4677.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1133898829.4677.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1133899564.15382.3.camel@ignacio.lan> On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 19:53 +0000, Andy Burns wrote: > I've got postgresql 8.1 installed OK on FC5t5 (well rawhide) and wanted > to install pgadmin III to go along with it. > > I tried using yum, but it can't solve all dependencies, looks like it > needs rebuilding to pick up different .so names? > > Also is it possible that extras might be updated to pgAdmin III v1.4.0 > which I believe is best to make use of the new 8.x features? http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 6 20:23:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:23:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175127] New: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://huli.org/wavbreaker OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: dmaley at redhat.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com SPEC URL: http://homer.homelinux.net/RPMS/wavbreaker.spec SRPM URL: http://homer.homelinux.net/RPMS/wavbreaker-0.6.1-homer.2.src.rpm Description: This application's purpose in life is to take a wave file and break it up into multiple wave files, cleanly breaking them at the correct position to burn the files to an audio cd without any dead air between the tracks. Additional info: This is my first package proposal to Fedora Extras and thus I believe I'll also need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 6 20:48:40 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:48:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512062048.jB6KmeAu005602@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 adrian at lisas.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |adrian at lisas.de OtherBugsDependingO| |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From adrian at lisas.de 2005-12-06 15:48 EST ------- This needs lot of work. The spec file is far from what is specified in the guidelines at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines * Source needs full URL * Strange release tag * Buildroot should be as in the guidelines * BR libxml2-devel, desktop-file-utils missing * redundant "-n %{name}-%{version}" in %setup * why has %configure --prefix added * make needs smp flags if possible (else comment why not) * use install -p instead of cp * use of desktop-file-install is wrong (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#desktop) * does not build in mock: checking for gtk+-2.0 gthread-2.0 libxml-2.0... Package libxml-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libxml-2.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'libxml-2.0' found configure: error: Library requirements (gtk+-2.0 gthread-2.0 libxml-2.0) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.19644 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 6 21:44:51 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:44:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512062144.jB6LipxR016668@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 ------- Additional Comments From dmaley at redhat.com 2005-12-06 16:44 EST ------- Thanks for the quick initial feedback. I'll get working on these initial problems and will update here when done ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 6 22:13:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:13:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512062213.jB6MDcHT023289@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at niemueller.de 2005-12-06 17:13 EST ------- I have read the new man page and it states what you say. It does not seem that there is a way to disable this feature at the moment. I can't see any postings to the OpenVPN devel list that mention this problem. Since what this flag does is exactly what NM already does there should be a way to disable this option. I will send an email to their mailinglist stating this problem. Thanks for pointing this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 6 22:23:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:23:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175144] New: Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175144 Summary: Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/munin/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/munin/munin.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/munin/munin-1.2.4-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: Network-wide graphing framework Munin is a highly flexible and powerful solution used to create graphs of virtually everything imaginable throughout your network, while still maintaining a rattling ease of installation and configuration. The main munin package description: This package contains the grapher/gatherer. You will only need one instance of it in your network. It will periodically poll all the nodes in your network it's aware of for data, which it in turn will use to create graphs and HTML pages, suitable for viewing with your graphical web browser of choice. The munin-node package description: This package contains node software. You should install it on all the nodes in your network. It will know how to extract all sorts of data from the node it runs on, and will wait for the gatherer to request this data for further processing. It includes a range of plugins capable of extracting common values such as cpu usage, network usage, load average, and so on. Creating your own plugins which are capable of extracting other system-specific values is very easy, and is often done in a matter of minutes. You can also create plugins which relay information from other devices in your network that can't run Munin, such as a switch or a server running another operating system, by using SNMP or similar technology. Munin is written in Perl, and relies heavily on Tobi Oetiker's excellent RRDtool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 6 22:27:03 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:27:03 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051206222703.5BB558013@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 6 bittorrent-4.2.1-1.fc3 fortune-firefly-2.0.1-1.fc3 gambas-1.0.13-3.fc3 gpgme-1.0.3-2.fc3 nmh-1.1-12.fc3 sbcl-0.9.7-1.fc3.1 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 6 22:23:43 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:23:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512062223.jB6MNhW5025434@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175144 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 6 22:38:53 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:38:53 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051206223853.D06E98013@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 8 bittorrent-4.2.1-1.fc4 fortune-firefly-2.0.1-1.fc4 ghdl-0.21-0.24svn.3.fc4 gpgme-1.0.3-2.fc4 nmh-1.1-12.fc4 sbcl-0.9.7-1.fc4 tclxml-3.1-1.fc4 xemacs-21.4.18-1.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 6 22:41:07 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:41:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174879] Review Request: giFT (giftd) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512062241.jB6Mf7P9028445@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: giFT (giftd) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174879 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-06 17:40 EST ------- On the other hand, things such as bittorrent, dclib, gtk-gnutella and valknut are in Extras. Is this different in some way? See also https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-September/msg01573.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 6 22:48:26 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:48:26 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051206224826.865908013@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 13 NetworkManager-vpnc-0.3-3 alsa-tools-1.0.10-1.fc5 balsa-2.3.7-1.fc5 bittorrent-4.2.1-1.fc5 fortune-firefly-2.0.1-1.fc5 galeon-2.0.0-2.fc5 gossip-0.9-7.fc5 libesmtp-1.0.3r1-7.fc5 linphone-1.1.0-2.fc5 nmh-1.1-12.fc5 ortp-0.7.1-1.fc5 psi-0.10-0.2.test3.fc5 tclxml-3.1-1.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 6 22:55:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:55:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173080] Review Request: fdupes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512062255.jB6Mt9uv030782@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fdupes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173080 ------- Additional Comments From simonb at thoughtpolice.co.uk 2005-12-06 17:55 EST ------- Hi Adrian, Thanks for the heads up. It's in now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From toshio at tiki-lounge.com Tue Dec 6 23:58:34 2005 From: toshio at tiki-lounge.com (Toshio Kuratomi) Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 15:58:34 -0800 Subject: pgadmin in FC5/extras In-Reply-To: <1133898829.4677.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1133898829.4677.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1133913515.26084.3.camel@localhost> On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 19:53 +0000, Andy Burns wrote: > Hi, > > I've got postgresql 8.1 installed OK on FC5t5 (well rawhide) and wanted > to install pgadmin III to go along with it. > > I tried using yum, but it can't solve all dependencies, looks like it > needs rebuilding to pick up different .so names? > > Also is it possible that extras might be updated to pgAdmin III v1.4.0 > which I believe is best to make use of the new 8.x features? > You'll want to look at this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=148958 Basically, pgadminIII has been waiting on an update of wxGTK. -Toshio -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 01:35:10 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 20:35:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175144] Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512070135.jB71ZA3p023901@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175144 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2005-12-06 20:34 EST ------- Hi Kevin, this isn't a thorough review but it is a start: nits: - rpmlint reports: E: munin non-standard-uid /var/www/html/munin munin E: munin non-standard-gid /var/www/html/munin munin E: munin non-standard-uid /var/log/munin munin E: munin non-standard-gid /var/log/munin munin E: munin non-standard-uid /var/lib/munin munin E: munin non-standard-gid /var/lib/munin munin E: munin non-standard-uid /var/run/munin munin E: munin non-standard-gid /var/run/munin munin E: munin-node non-standard-uid /var/lib/munin/plugin-state munin E: munin-node non-standard-gid /var/lib/munin/plugin-state munin which seem to be safe to ignore - running "yum localinstall [...the two noarch rpms...]" results in two errors: Error: Missing Dependency: perl(DBD::Sybase) is needed by \ package munin-node Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Net::SNMP) is needed by \ package munin-node which I have no idea how to fix. Perhaps someone else has a clue whats happening here -- is it somehow pulling in unnecessary dependencies...? good: + source matches upstream + spec is readable and looks OK + code not content + builds in mock on FC-4 + appears to use the correct syntax wrt user and group creation: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserCreation + dir ownership looks good -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 03:49:30 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 22:49:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175163] New: Review Request: Test Bug - Please disregard Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175163 Summary: Review Request: Test Bug - Please disregard Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: dkl at redhat.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: SRPM Name or Url: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 03:49:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 22:49:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512070349.jB73nkZl011221@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 dkl at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175163 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 06:08:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 01:08:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512070608.jB7688df030203@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 ------- Additional Comments From dmaley at redhat.com 2005-12-07 01:08 EST ------- OK I believe I've addressed all the problems listed above. SPEC location is unchanged. SRPM: http://homer.homelinux.net/RPMS/wavbreaker-0.6.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 07:22:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 02:22:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512070722.jB77MELD006886@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2005-12-07 02:21 EST ------- What's the status for building on x86_64 right now? Is there any more patches that needs to go into upstreams svn to get it work? It would be nice if next upstreams release really would work on 64 bits machines... Another question from an Extras newbie: When does the review start? Since I thought what we were doing right here was the review I'm a bit confused right now. Do we wait for next upstreams release before reviewing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 07:23:40 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 02:23:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175168] New: Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175168 Summary: Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: denisleroy at yahoo.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gideon.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.poolshark.org/src/gideon-R4-0.1.BETA.src.rpm Description: Gideon is a versatile GUI designer for GTK/C++. The goal of the project is to provide an easy to use RAD tool for C++ programmers who want to create multi-platform GTK/gtkmm-based GUI applications. Gideon is not overloaded but strives to provide all necessary features and remain simple and lightweight to the end user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 07:24:07 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 02:24:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512070724.jB77O75G007198@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 denisleroy at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175168 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 07:24:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 02:24:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512070724.jB77OqeE007319@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2005-12-07 02:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #111) > ok the change I made fixed the apache problem .... > but it still hangs on or after mounting sysfs > mounting sysfs as /sys (and nothing happens) > no disk ativity but numlock still works It's hard to tell what might be the error here. Could you insert some echo's into strategic places in /etc/initng/system/initial.i to see exactly where the boot stops? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 07:53:06 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 02:53:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512070753.jB77r6ZY010354@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-07 02:52 EST ------- What is the status of http://bugzilla.initng.thinktux.net/show_bug.cgi?id=313 ? There is an 'In SVN.' message but it does not seem to be applied. (I can commit it also but not before this afternoon (CET)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 08:01:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 03:01:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512070801.jB781S3c012153@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 ------- Additional Comments From denisleroy at yahoo.com 2005-12-07 03:01 EST ------- It's missing a "BuildRequires: alsa-lib-devel". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 08:39:03 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 03:39:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512070839.jB78d3vT019350@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-07 03:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #114) > (In reply to comment #111) > > ok the change I made fixed the apache problem .... > > but it still hangs on or after mounting sysfs > > mounting sysfs as /sys (and nothing happens) > > no disk ativity but numlock still works > > It's hard to tell what might be the error here. Could you insert some echo's > into strategic places in /etc/initng/system/initial.i to see exactly where the > boot stops? ok I updated the snapshot to 2357 and now it hangs after /dev nor after /sys changed initial.i to look like this: ----------- # Ok, go create /dev echo "Mounting ramfs at /dev ..." /bin/mkdir -p /dev && mount -n -o size=10M,mode=0755 -t tmpfs tmpfs /dev echo "/dev mounted" /bin/mknod /dev/null c 1 3 -m 666 echo "/dev/null created" # Launch udevd daemon /sbin/udevd --daemon echo "started udevd" ---------- the messages "started udevd" never gets printed... so it seems to hang on /sbin/udevd --daemon (but I don't know why) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 09:09:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 04:09:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512070909.jB799Qia024085@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2005-12-07 04:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #116) > the messages "started udevd" never gets printed... > so it seems to hang on /sbin/udevd --daemon > (but I don't know why) Since I've got no idea what happens here I've posted an upstreams bug. http://bugzilla.initng.thinktux.net/show_bug.cgi?id=326 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 09:41:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 04:41:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512070941.jB79fqmf027771@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at niemueller.de 2005-12-07 04:41 EST ------- I have initiated a discussion about this. You can follow the thread and post your findings to the OpenVPN-devel list. See the thread at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.network.openvpn.devel/1390 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 10:34:21 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 05:34:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173111] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512071034.jB7AYLrU001390@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173111 ------- Additional Comments From luya256 at yahoo.com 2005-12-07 05:34 EST ------- Update. Succesfully passed rpmlint. It tooks me 20 built for that tiny details :/. Seems to be mediocre for a first built package. Any way, here is the updated spec and srpms. http://finalzone.webmasterswebworkshop.com/Fedora/gdesklets.spec http://finalzone.webmasterswebworkshop.com/Fedora/gdesklets-0.35.2-20.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net Wed Dec 7 12:22:12 2005 From: thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net (Matthias Saou) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:22:12 +0100 Subject: Package ... enqued. (However, no Jod ID was provided...) In-Reply-To: <1133893116.2765.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1133893116.2765.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20051207132212.046b8f7a@python2> Dan Williams wrote : > On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 08:15 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Uh oh: > > > > $ make build > > Package ... enqueued. (However, no Job ID was provided in the time > > required) > > > > $ date > > Tue Dec 6 08:15:22 CST 2005 > > Kicked. As an update, I'm distilling a testcase for python+SSL that > exhibits the problem with multiple ACK packets that iptables on the > builders doesn't like. I believe that's the cause of this hang in the > build server. I'm getting that same error now too @ Wed Dec 7 13:21:44 CET 2005. Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz) - Linux kernel 2.6.14-1.1644_FC4 Load : 2.78 2.44 2.53 From rc040203 at freenet.de Wed Dec 7 12:43:34 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 13:43:34 +0100 Subject: Package ... enqued. (However, no Jod ID was provided...) In-Reply-To: <1133893116.2765.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1133893116.2765.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1133959414.10823.187.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 13:18 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 08:15 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Uh oh: > > > > $ make build > > Package ... enqueued. (However, no Job ID was provided in the time > > required) > > > > $ date > > Tue Dec 6 08:15:22 CST 2005 > > Kicked. And broken again: $ make plague Package ... enqueued. (However, no Job ID was provided in the time required) $ date Wed Dec 7 13:42:59 CET 2005 Ralf From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 16:28:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 11:28:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173040] Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512071628.jB7GSGhj024818@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173040 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-12-07 11:28 EST ------- How about ifarch it to include/exclude valgrind only if it is capable on that architecture? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 17:12:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:12:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175198] New: Review Request: perl-Math-Pari Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175198 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Pari Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Math-Pari/perl-Math-Pari.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Math-Pari/perl-Math-Pari-2.010702-1.src.rpm Description: This package is a Perl interface to the famous library PARI for numerical/ scientific/ number-theoretic calculations. It allows use of most PARI functions as Perl functions, and (almost) seamless merging of PARI and Perl data. Notes: This package includes the pari library source even though that is being introduced to Fedora Extras in its own right (#169703). The rationale for this is: (a) This package patches the library source code (b) This package integrates very tightly with the library and may break if the library is changed underneath it (c) Functionality is lost if built against an external PARI library (see the INSTALL file in the distribution) This module is required by various crypto-related perl modules I intend to submit at a later date. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 17:13:03 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:13:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512071713.jB7HD37R031309@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175198 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 17:15:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:15:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512071715.jB7HFE67031765@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-07 12:15 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Would you also consider packaging the perl interface to pari, Math::Pari > (http://search.cpan.org/dist/Math-Pari/)? This module is used by several crypto > modules I'm interested in. Following up on this, since the perl package wants to patch the library source, I think it's better to do that as a completely separate package that includes and patches the pari source itself. I've submitted this as Bug 175198. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 17:19:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:19:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171638] Review Request: perl-IPC-Shareable - Share Perl variables between processes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512071719.jB7HJGMQ032098@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Shareable - Share Perl variables between processes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171638 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-07 12:19 EST ------- Looks like a cut-and-paste error for that SRPM URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 17:19:48 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:19:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512071719.jB7HJm28032166@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at niemueller.de 2005-12-07 12:19 EST ------- I'm not sure what caused you problems, Jeffrey, but it was stated now on the OpenVPN mailinglist (see link in earlier posting) that this will not become the default. So this problem should be cleared. Is there someone willing to sponsor this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 17:21:11 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:21:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512071721.jB7HLBBh032450@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2005-12-07 12:21 EST ------- Corrected version: SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnu-smalltalk//gnu-smalltalk.spec SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnu-smalltalk//gnu-smalltalk-2.2-4.src.rpm Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 17:23:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:23:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512071723.jB7HNPJY000322@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2005-12-07 12:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Following up on this, since the perl package wants to patch the library source, > I think it's better to do that as a completely separate package that includes > and patches the pari source itself. I've submitted this as Bug 175198. Are these patches specific to the Perl package, or can they be included here without comprimising the package. If so, the Perl package needn't include pari and can depend on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 17:33:36 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:33:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171638] Review Request: perl-IPC-Shareable - Share Perl variables between processes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512071733.jB7HXaPM001959@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Shareable - Share Perl variables between processes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171638 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2005-12-07 12:33 EST ------- Sorry. The correct URL is: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-IPC-Shareable-0.60-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 17:41:22 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:41:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169703] Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512071741.jB7HfM0u002748@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pari - Number Theory-oriented Computer Algebra System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169703 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-07 12:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Following up on this, since the perl package wants to patch the library source, > > I think it's better to do that as a completely separate package that includes > > and patches the pari source itself. I've submitted this as Bug 175198. > > Are these patches specific to the Perl package, or can they be > included here without comprimising the package. Possibly. You can browse them at http://search.cpan.org/src/ILYAZ/Math-Pari-2.010702/patches/ The ones that get applied against pari 2.1.7 are: * patch-pari-unnormalized-float * diff_2.1.7_-O * diff_2.1.7_restart > If so, the Perl package needn't include pari and can depend on this. There are actually other benefits to building perl-Math-Pari independently, which include: * building against an external library isn't supported by upstream * PARI tests can't get run as perl tests * the POD doesn't get created * it's conceivable that the library and perl module could get built with incompatible compiler options This is discussed in more depth here: http://search.cpan.org/src/ILYAZ/Math-Pari-2.010702/INSTALL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 17:53:07 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:53:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175201] New: Review Request: python-cheetah Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175201 Summary: Review Request: python-cheetah Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: mikeb at redhat.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://people.redhat.com/mikeb/extras/python-cheetah.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://people.redhat.com/mikeb/extras/python-cheetah-1.0-1.src.rpm Description: I've packaged the Cheetah template engine and would like to get it reviewed for inclusion into Extras. Cheetah is a Python-powered template engine and code generator. It can be used as a standalone utility or it can be combined with other tools. Cheetah has many potential uses, but web developers looking for a viable alternative to ASP, JSP, PHP and PSP are expected to be its principle user group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 17:53:19 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:53:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512071753.jB7HrJ2n005150@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 mikeb at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175201 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 17:57:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:57:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175201] Review Request: python-cheetah In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512071757.jB7HvYXl005810@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-cheetah https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175201 ------- Additional Comments From mikeb at redhat.com 2005-12-07 12:57 EST ------- Forgot to mention that this is my first Extras package, and I'm seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 17:59:13 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:59:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174879] Review Request: giFT (giftd) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512071759.jB7HxDmc005991@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: giFT (giftd) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174879 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-07 12:59 EST ------- As I remember, "dclib" was in Livna too, but was added to Extras later, as people became less paranoid. :) If this package will not contain links to some illegal stuff, it should be moved to Extras as well. (for comment#1): AFAIK specifying explicit Livna location is a little bit illegal thing here... ;) :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 18:55:10 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:55:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512071855.jB7ItAtk013371@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2005-12-07 13:55 EST ------- Is it NetworkManager itself then that is changing my default route then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 19:10:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 14:10:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512071910.jB7JAE5H015710@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at niemueller.de 2005-12-07 14:10 EST ------- Yes. If you don't want that set the list of networks that should be routed via the VPN in the optional information expander. This will cause NM to only route these networks over the VPN and not the default route. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 19:39:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 14:39:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512071939.jB7Jd0m6020778@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ollie.clive.ia.us 2005-12-07 14:38 EST ------- Aha... I'll have to try that when I get home. I haven't tried any other VPN plugins so I was thinking that that field controlled when the VPN service got activated. While whether to replace the default gateway by default could be debated either way, the wording of the option leaves something to be desired. That's a matter for the NetworkManager list though. Is there a way that you could package v0.3.1 for testing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 20:32:53 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 15:32:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512072032.jB7KWrqK029783@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2005-12-07 15:32 EST ------- NEEDSWORK MD5Sums: 682d452e4b05c77b5a258c7ec49634bc nautilus-actions-0.99.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * Desktop entry is fine * All directories are owned by this or other packages * No deprecated fields used * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * All desired features are enabled * Package rebuilds as non-root user * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Files have appropriate permissions and owners Needswork: * In the %pre section, you scriptlet needs to be changed, the [NAME] should be changed to config_newaction. * Rpmlint errors: E: nautilus-actions description-line-too-long W: nautilus-actions conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/config_newaction.schemas W: nautilus-actions devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/nautilus-actions-config W: nautilus-actions devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/nautilus-actions-new-config * The line where you remove the fedora*.desktop file can be removed, since it comes before where the desktop file is created & installed. The --delete-original switch handles the .desktop file that comes with the source. * It seems redundant to include both the AUTHORS & MAINTAINERS files, since the MAINTAINER file only contains their e-mail addresses, which is also included in the AUTHORS file. I would suggest not packing the MAINTAINERS file. Notes: I'm not running Rawhide, so I'm not able to verify that this runs correctly. It does build fine in Mock, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 20:36:30 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 15:36:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512072036.jB7KaUuu030035@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at niemueller.de 2005-12-07 15:36 EST ------- Done. Download from http://www.niemueller.de/software/patches/NetworkManager-openvpn-0.3.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From roland at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 21:07:10 2005 From: roland at redhat.com (Roland McGrath) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:07:10 -0800 (PST) Subject: lua maintainer Message-ID: <20051207210710.41ED31809BC@magilla.sf.frob.com> Lua is orphaned. I maintain the monotone package, which has lua as a build requirement. I have no particular interest in or knowledge about Lua myself, but if noone else is maintaining it then I'll take it over to keep my build requirement up to date. Btw, I can't readily tell what else might use lua. No built rpms require it (says repoquery). But I don't have a repoquery option to check for Buildrequires referring to it, which is the only kind of dependency that is actually likely for lua. Thanks, Roland From wtogami at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 21:12:54 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 16:12:54 -0500 Subject: lua maintainer In-Reply-To: <20051207210710.41ED31809BC@magilla.sf.frob.com> References: <20051207210710.41ED31809BC@magilla.sf.frob.com> Message-ID: <43975056.8050004@redhat.com> Roland McGrath wrote: > Lua is orphaned. I maintain the monotone package, which has lua as a build > requirement. I have no particular interest in or knowledge about Lua > myself, but if noone else is maintaining it then I'll take it over to keep > my build requirement up to date. > > Btw, I can't readily tell what else might use lua. No built rpms require > it (says repoquery). But I don't have a repoquery option to check for > Buildrequires referring to it, which is the only kind of dependency that is > actually likely for lua. > IIRC lua was included only for completeness, not because anybody actually used it. There is an embedded copy of it inside of apt. Go ahead and take maintainership if it is neglected. Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 22:33:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:33:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173111] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512072233.jB7MXEJ6014602@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173111 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-12-07 17:32 EST ------- Luya, please do not import packages until someone gives an explicit "APPROVED" message here. #%_install #rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} #make -e install DESTDIR=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} Why is this in the spec when it does nothing? [ -n $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -a $RPM_BUILD_ROOT != / ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT This can always be simplified to rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. You may want to make it look just like the one in %clean. Keep things consistent. Most specs don't have an excessive use of {}'s around env var names, although it doesn't hurt I guess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 22:45:05 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:45:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175237] New: Review Request: bzr - bazaar-ng distributed revision control system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175237 Summary: Review Request: bzr - bazaar-ng distributed revision control system Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: shahms at shahms.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Url: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/yum/packages/bzr.spec SRPM URL: http://shahms.mesd.k12.or.us/yum/packages/bzr-0.6.2-1.src.rpm Description: Bazaar-NG, the next-generation distributed revision control system is where the (former) developers of the bazaar fork of GNU Arch are now focusing there efforts. It is a distributed, friendly, simple and flexible revision control system written in Python. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 7 22:45:21 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:45:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512072245.jB7MjLol016512@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 shahms at shahms.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175237 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 00:08:44 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 19:08:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512080008.jB808idu026157@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2005-12-07 19:08 EST ------- I've actually corrected most of the things you pointed out (except for removing the MAINTAINERS file) in my local version, I just forgot to post it here. As for the rpmlint warnings, I'm not sure if its really necessary to create a devel subpackage for this nautilus-actions. ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/nact/nautilus-actions.spec ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/nact/nautilus-actions-0.99-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 00:34:54 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 19:34:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512080034.jB80Ysdk029803@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2005-12-07 19:34 EST ------- Oh, I forgot one other thing. Is e2fsprogs-devel really needed to build this? I don't see anything the configure script that would require this, since e2fsprogs deals with ext2 filesystems. Also, it looks like you description in your spec is still to long. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 00:46:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 19:46:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175144] Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512080046.jB80k9rD031308@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175144 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2005-12-07 19:46 EST ------- Thats for taking a look! There is one plugin that needs DBD::Sybase, which is easy to remove for now... There are several more plugins that use Net::SNMP, but it turns out that the main configure program also tries to use it. It's not however required, if it can't load the module it just doesn't use any SNMP functionality. I could possibly remove the Net::SNMP checks and plugins, will investigate that... Or possibly package Net::SNMP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 00:49:54 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 19:49:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512080049.jB80ns15031634@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2005-12-07 19:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Oh, I forgot one other thing. Is e2fsprogs-devel really needed to build this? Yes. I'm quite surprised by it too, building it in a clean mock will fail without e2fsprogs-devel. > I don't see anything the configure script that would require this, since > e2fsprogs deals with ext2 filesystems. > > Also, it looks like you description in your spec is still to long. I'll shorten it in the next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 05:23:53 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 00:23:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512080523.jB85NrEN006647@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174866 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2005-12-08 00:23 EST ------- NEEDSWORK MD5Sums: 1c3693ab9c6904dbed6dfa7656778de4 polypaudio-0.7.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * No deprecated fields used * All desired features are enabled * Package rebuilds as non-root user * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly on FC4. (After adding missing BR) Needswork: * Package needs additional BuildRequires: Missing BR for xorg-x11-devel on FC4 Missing BR for libXt-devel & xorg-x11-proto-devel on FC5 (You might want to verify that I'm correct on the necessary BR for FC5). * Rpmlint errors: W: polypaudio unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/polypaudio E: polypaudio setuid-binary /usr/bin/polypaudio root 04755 E: polypaudio non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/polypaudio 04755 E: polypaudio non-executable-script /etc/polypaudio/default.pa 0644 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From pmatilai at laiskiainen.org Thu Dec 8 08:14:37 2005 From: pmatilai at laiskiainen.org (Panu Matilainen) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 00:14:37 -0800 (PST) Subject: lua maintainer In-Reply-To: <43975056.8050004@redhat.com> References: <20051207210710.41ED31809BC@magilla.sf.frob.com> <43975056.8050004@redhat.com> Message-ID: On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Warren Togami wrote: > Roland McGrath wrote: >> Lua is orphaned. I maintain the monotone package, which has lua as a build >> requirement. I have no particular interest in or knowledge about Lua >> myself, but if noone else is maintaining it then I'll take it over to keep >> my build requirement up to date. >> >> Btw, I can't readily tell what else might use lua. No built rpms require >> it (says repoquery). But I don't have a repoquery option to check for >> Buildrequires referring to it, which is the only kind of dependency that is >> actually likely for lua. Actually it is possible to query BuildRequires with repoquery, but you'll need to add a separate yum.repos.d entry for FE sources with something like http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/4/SRPMS/ as the baseurl. Then you can do repoquery --whatrequires lua '*.src' That works at least with the cvs head version, but should work with the yum-utils 0.3.1 version as well. > IIRC lua was included only for completeness, not because anybody actually > used it. There is an embedded copy of it inside of apt. Go ahead and take > maintainership if it is neglected. I don't know of anything requiring it either, but then it can be used as a standalone programming/scripting language if one is masochistic enough :P - Panu - From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 09:49:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 04:49:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173111] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512080949.jB89nTKW003846@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173111 ------- Additional Comments From luya256 at yahoo.com 2005-12-08 04:49 EST ------- My bad, Warren. I was too impatient to test cvs command. I forgot to remove these mentionned lines being to excited to finally get gdesklets passing rpmlint. gdesklets spec was a bit challenging than I expected especially the symlink problem I faced. I have to start somewhere. Latest update with cleaned spec: http://finalzone.webmasterswebworkshop.com/Fedora/gdesklets.spec http://finalzone.webmasterswebworkshop.com/Fedora/gdesklets-0.35.2-21.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 10:25:55 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 05:25:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171638] Review Request: perl-IPC-Shareable - Share Perl variables between processes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081025.jB8APtJ8007395@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Shareable - Share Perl variables between processes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171638 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |paul at city-fan.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-08 05:25 EST ------- Review: - rpmlint clean - package and spec naming OK - package meets guidelines - license is GPL, matches spec, text included - spec file written in English and is legible - sources match upstream - builds OK on FC4 (i386) and in mock for rawhide (i386) - no explicit BR's - no locales, libraries, subpackages or pkgconfigs to worry about - not relocatable - no directory ownership or permissions problems - no duplicate files - %clean section present and correct - macro usage is consistent - code, not content - no large docs - docs don't affect runtime - no desktop file needed - no scriptlets Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 10:34:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 05:34:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081034.jB8AYZer008438@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-08 05:34 EST ------- Regarding the circular dependencies between this module, Log::Log4perl, and Log::Dispatch, have you considered bundling them all together in one package, as was done with DateTime, DateTime::Locale, and DateTime::TimeZone (Bug 167376)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Thu Dec 8 11:26:06 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 12:26:06 +0100 Subject: yum error in buildsys Message-ID: <1134041166.18030.27.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Hi, another kind of buildsys-error, this time seemingly raised by yum: ---- snip --- Job failed on arch ppc Build logs may be found at [..] ------------------------------------------------- shadow-utils ppc 2:4.0.13-4 core 894 k sqlite ppc 3.2.7-2 core 217 k sysklogd ppc 1.4.1-33 core 77 k tcl ppc 8.4.11-1 core 958 k tcp_wrappers ppc 7.6-39 core 106 k termcap noarch 1:5.4-7 core 263 k tzdata noarch 2005n-2 core 435 k util-linux ppc 2.13-0.11.pre6 core 1.8 M yaboot ppc 1.3.13-0.16 core 171 k zlib ppc 1.2.3-1 core 52 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 136 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 119 M Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/libexec/mock-yum", line 12, in ? yummain.main(sys.argv[1:]) File "/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.py", line 170, in main base.doTransaction() File "/usr/share/yum-cli/cli.py", line 710, in doTransaction self.runTransaction(cb=cb) File "__init__.py", line 348, in runTransaction File "/usr/share/yum-cli/callback.py", line 105, in callback fd = os.open(rpmloc, os.O_RDONLY) OSError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/ppc/Fedora/RPMS/libselinux-1.27.28-1.ppc.rpm' Cleaning up... Done. ---- snip --- Seems to me as if the components underneath the buildsys (createrepo, yum, mock, etc.) have a synchronization problem. Ralf From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 11:25:13 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 06:25:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172677] Review Request: perl-Readonly In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081125.jB8BPDcM017378@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172677 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |paul at city-fan.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-08 06:25 EST ------- Review: - rpmlint clean - package and spec naming OK - spec file written in English and is legible - sources match upstream - package builds OK on FC4 (i386) and in mock for rawhide (i386) - no locales, libraries, subpackages or pkgconfigs to worry about - not relocatable - no directory ownership or permissions problems - no duplicate files - code, not content - %clean section present and correct - macro usage is consistent - no large docs - docs don't affect runtime - no desktop entry needed - no scriptlets Needswork: - license is same as perl (i.e. GPL or Artistic), not just Artistic - redundant BR perl (listed in exceptions section of packaging guidelines) - redundant BR's perl(Test::More) and perl(Test::Harness) - both modules are bundled with perl Suggestions: - use %{?_smp_mflags} with make in %build - "find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f {} ';'" not needed for noarch packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 11:26:45 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 06:26:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173053] Review Request: perl-Readonly-XS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081126.jB8BQj1j017728@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173053 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |paul at city-fan.org OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-08 06:26 EST ------- Review: - rpmlint clean - package and spec naming OK - spec file written in English and is legible - sources match upstream - package builds OK on FC4 (i386) and in mock for rawhide (i386) - no locales, libraries, subpackages or pkgconfigs to worry about - not relocatable - no directory ownership or permissions problems - no duplicate files - code, not content - %clean section present and correct - macro usage is consistent - no large docs - docs don't affect runtime - no desktop entry needed - no scriptlets Needswork: - license is same as perl (i.e. GPL or Artistic), not just Artistic - redundant BR perl (listed in exceptions section of packaging guidelines) Suggestions: - minor change to %description: Readonly::XS is a companion module for Readonly, to speed up read-only scalar variables. Note: - version 1.04 of this module is now available, and presents a couple of issues if you're considering updating this package: * The "Requires: perl-Readonly = %{version}" won't be satisfied because there is no 1.04 version of perl-Readonly * The Makefile.PL introduces a buildreq on Readonly, which will be a circular dependency since your perl-Readonly package requires perl-Readonly-XS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Thu Dec 8 11:47:09 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 12:47:09 +0100 Subject: yum error in buildsys In-Reply-To: <1134041166.18030.27.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <1134041166.18030.27.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <1134042430.18030.31.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 12:26 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Hi, > > another kind of buildsys-error, this time seemingly raised by yum: > requeuing the failed job, triggered, yet another, different one: --- snip --- Job failed on arch x86_64 Build logs may be found at [..] ------------------------------------------------- ensuring dir /mnt/build/builder_work/b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/result ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/var/lib/rpm ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/var/log ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/dev ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/etc/rpm ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/tmp ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/var/tmp ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/etc/yum.repos.d ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/proc ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/dev/pts ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/proc ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/dev/pts /usr/sbin/mock-helper yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root groupinstall build Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) is needed by package libsetrans Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) is needed by package libsetrans Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by package libsetrans Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6 is needed by package libsetrans Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by package libsetrans Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by package libsetrans Error: Missing Dependency: libdl.so.2 is needed by package libsetrans Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by package libsetrans Error: Missing Dependency: libselinux.so.1 is needed by package libsetrans unhandled node in : category unhandled node in : category unhandled node in : category unhandled node in : category unhandled node in : category unhandled node in : category Cleaning up... Done. --- snip --- Something is in deep limbo, I'd say. Ralf From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 14:12:36 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:12:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081412.jB8ECae3004545@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174866 ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2005-12-08 09:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > * Rpmlint errors: > W: polypaudio unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/polypaudio Out of curiosity: did you build in mock ? In my home setup, I have in .rpmmacros: %debug_package %{nil} %_enable_debug_packages 0 and I noticed that it (apparently) causes the unstripped warnings in rpmlint... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 14:42:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:42:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081442.jB8EgVmx009725@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174866 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2005-12-08 09:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Out of curiosity: did you build in mock ? Yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 14:42:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:42:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173927] Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081442.jB8EgnTg009811@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173927 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-08 09:42 EST ------- %changelog * Wed Nov 23 2005 Rex Dieter 2.0-0.4.rc1 - 2.0rc1 Spec Name or Url:http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/akode-2.0-0.4.rc1.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/akode-2.0-0.4.rc1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 14:44:42 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:44:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166550] Review Request: synce-software-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081444.jB8EigF9010281@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-software-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166550 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2005-12-08 09:44 EST ------- Okay I'm willing to pick up the synce* submissions from late August to do the package guidelines review. But I don't have the winCE based hardware to test functionality against. Is there a way to fake a device with synce or anything like that? I can get started on reviewing synce-software-manager first and then move on to the other ones from there. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 14:45:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:45:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175276] New: Review Request: gift: daemon for communicating with filesharing protocols Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175276 Summary: Review Request: gift: daemon for communicating with filesharing protocols Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url:http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/gift-0.11.8.1-1.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/gift-0.11.8.1-1.src.rpm Description: giFT is a modular daemon capable of abstracting the communication between the end user and specific filesharing protocols (peer-to-peer or otherwise). See also previous livna review and comments: http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=230 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 14:46:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:46:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081446.jB8Ek9CC010532@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175276 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 14:46:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:46:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081446.jB8EkIjU010577@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174866 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-08 09:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > * Rpmlint errors: > > W: polypaudio unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/polypaudio > > Out of curiosity: did you build in mock ? > In my home setup, I have in .rpmmacros: > %debug_package %{nil} > %_enable_debug_packages 0 > and I noticed that it (apparently) causes the unstripped warnings in rpmlint... That's to be expected. Turning off the separate debug package means that the debug information is left in the main package, i.e. not stripped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 14:46:55 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:46:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174879] Review Request: giFT (giftd) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081446.jB8Ektw1010735@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: giFT (giftd) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174879 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-08 09:46 EST ------- This one appears to need a lot of work (has no BR's), lots of needless subpkgs, and is incompatible with livna package... and the submitter apparently is not yet sponsored. I'll take the liberty of closing this, and (re)submitting all of gift, gift-openft, gift-gnutella, apollon to FE for review within the next day or 2. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 175276 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 14:47:13 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:47:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175276] Review Request: gift: daemon for communicating with filesharing protocols In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081447.jB8ElDdX010825@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gift: daemon for communicating with filesharing protocols https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175276 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |agentunix at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-08 09:47 EST ------- *** Bug 174879 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 14:52:40 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:52:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175278] New: Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175278 Summary: Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url:http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/gift-gnutella-0.0.10-1.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/gift-gnutella-0.0.10-1.src.rpm Description: Gnutella plugin for giFT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 14:52:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:52:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081452.jB8EqqJa012140@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175278 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 14:56:48 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:56:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175279] New: Review Request: gift-openft: Openft plugin for giFT Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175279 Summary: Review Request: gift-openft: Openft plugin for giFT Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url:http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/gift-gnutella-0.0.10-1.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/gift-gnutella-0.0.10-1.src.rpm Description: Openft plugin for giFT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 14:57:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:57:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081457.jB8Ev0IS013156@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175279 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 14:58:54 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:58:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175280] New: Review Request: perl-Digest-BubbleBabble Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175280 Summary: Review Request: perl-Digest-BubbleBabble Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Digest-BubbleBabble/perl-Digest-BubbleBabble.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Digest-BubbleBabble/perl-Digest-BubbleBabble-0.01-1.src.rpm Description: Digest::BubbleBabble takes a message digest (generated by either of the MD5 or SHA-1 message digest algorithms) and creates a fingerprint of that digest in "bubble babble" format. Bubble babble is a method of representing a message digest as a string of "real" words, to make the fingerprint easier to remember. The "words" are not necessarily real words, but they look more like words than a string of hex characters. Bubble babble fingerprinting is used by the SSH2 suite (and, consequently, by Net::SSH::Perl, the Perl SSH implementation) to display easy-to-remember key fingerprints. The key (a DSA or RSA key) is converted into a textual form, digested using Digest::SHA1, and run through bubblebabble to create the key fingerprint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 14:59:07 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:59:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081459.jB8Ex79U013741@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175280 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 14:59:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:59:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166550] Review Request: synce-software-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081459.jB8ExIpc013808@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-software-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166550 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-08 09:59 EST ------- Thanks :) Hm, to my knowledge there is no non-tivial way to fake a winCE device. Does anybody know more about this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 15:01:19 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:01:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175281] New: Review Request: perl-Tie-EncryptedHash Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175281 Summary: Review Request: perl-Tie-EncryptedHash Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Tie-EncryptedHash/perl-Tie-EncryptedHash.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Tie-EncryptedHash/perl-Tie-EncryptedHash-1.21-1.src.rpm Description: Tie::EncryptedHash augments Perl hash semantics to build secure, encrypting containers of data. Tie::EncryptedHash introduces special hash fields that are coupled with encrypt/decrypt routines to encrypt assignments at STORE() and decrypt retrievals at FETCH(). By design, encrypting fields are associated with keys that begin in single underscore. The remaining keyspace is used for accessing normal hash fields, which are retained without modification. While the password is set, a Tie::EncryptedHash behaves exactly like a standard Perl hash. This is its transparent mode of access. Encrypting and normal fields are identical in this mode. When password is deleted, encrypting fields are accessible only as ciphertext. This is Tie::EncryptedHash's opaque mode of access, optimized for serialization. Encryption is done with Crypt::CBC(3), which encrypts in the cipher block chaining mode with Blowfish, DES or IDEA. Tie::EncryptedHash uses Blowfish by default, but can be instructed to employ any cipher supported by Crypt::CBC(3). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 15:01:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:01:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081501.jB8F1VPJ014334@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175281 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de Thu Dec 8 15:06:59 2005 From: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de (Andreas Bierfert) Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:06:59 +0100 Subject: yum error in buildsys In-Reply-To: <1134042430.18030.31.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <1134041166.18030.27.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1134042430.18030.31.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <43984C13.8000706@lowlatency.de> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Same here with 1615 > requeuing the failed job, triggered, yet another, different one: > > --- snip --- > Job failed on arch x86_64 > > > Build logs may be found at [..] > > ------------------------------------------------- > > ensuring dir /mnt/build/builder_work/b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/result > ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/var/lib/rpm > ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/var/log > ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/dev > ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/etc/rpm > ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/tmp > ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/var/tmp > ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/etc/yum.repos.d > ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/proc > ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/dev/pts > ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/proc > ensuring dir /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root/dev/pts > /usr/sbin/mock-helper yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-x86_64-core-b919a886f97e591b8cd0223015707c8f32844f68/root groupinstall build > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) is needed by package libsetrans > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) is needed by package libsetrans > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by package libsetrans > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6 is needed by package libsetrans > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by package libsetrans > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by package libsetrans > Error: Missing Dependency: libdl.so.2 is needed by package libsetrans > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) is needed by package libsetrans > Error: Missing Dependency: libselinux.so.1 is needed by package libsetrans > unhandled node in : category > unhandled node in : category > unhandled node in : category > unhandled node in : category > unhandled node in : category > unhandled node in : category > Cleaning up... > Done. > > --- snip --- > > Something is in deep limbo, I'd say. > > Ralf > > - -- Andreas Bierfert | http://awbsworld.de | GPG: C58CF1CB andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de | http://lowlatency.de | signed/encrypted phone: +49 2402 102373 | cell: +49 172 9789968 | mail preferred -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDmEwTQEQyPsWM8csRAmtsAKCCjzMxBiqlU/kXWCuXgHeLkH5QUQCfVQv4 n0BfIddF7p8r1I7dq5UsVYQ= =84ji -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 15:07:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:07:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175282] New: Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175282 Summary: Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url:http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/apollon-1.0.1-1.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/apollon-1.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: A filesharing client which uses giFT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 15:07:47 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:07:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081507.jB8F7liR015574@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175282 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 15:08:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:08:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175282] Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081508.jB8F8kTQ015829@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175282 rdieter at math.unl.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175276 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-08 10:08 EST ------- See also previous livna review/comments: http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=233 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 15:22:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:22:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081522.jB8FM8qq018578@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174866 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-08 10:21 EST ------- setuid/setgid executables are not stripped by rpmbuild, see bug 117858. Workaround: remove those bits in %install and restore in %files using %attr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 15:40:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:40:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175291] New: Review Request: perl-PatchReader - utilities to read and manipulate patches and CVS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175291 Summary: Review Request: perl-PatchReader - utilities to read and manipulate patches and CVS Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: stickster at gmail.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://rpm.frields.org/extras-testing/perl-PatchReader/perl-PatchReader.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://rpm.frields.org/extras-testing/perl-PatchReader/perl-PatchReader-0.9.5-1.src.rpm Description: PatchReader is a set of utilities for reading in, transforming, and doing various other things with a patch. It basically allows you to create a chain of readers that can read a patch, remove files from a patch, add CVS context, fix up the patch root according to CVS, and output the patch as raw unified or through a template processor (used in some places to output a patch as HTML). (As noted in %changelog, the spec is based on Dag Wieers' package of the same name.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 15:40:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:40:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081540.jB8FekxE021933@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 stickster at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175291 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ivazquez at ivazquez.net Thu Dec 8 16:14:19 2005 From: ivazquez at ivazquez.net (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams) Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:14:19 -0500 Subject: rpms/tinyerp/FC-4 tinyerp.spec,1.6,1.7 In-Reply-To: <200512081601.jB8G1RL4012071@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> References: <200512081601.jB8G1RL4012071@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1134058459.32688.3.camel@ignacio.lan> On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 11:00 -0500, Dan Horak wrote: > Log Message: > - set owner for dirs in %post instead of %pre > %post server > +chown -R tinyerp:tinyerp /var/log/tinyerp /var/spool/tinyerp > + > /sbin/chkconfig --add tinyerp-server Why aren't you using %attr for this? -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 16:24:50 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 11:24:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081624.jB8GOoO6029690@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2005-12-08 11:24 EST ------- Here are comments by package author, Frederic Ruaudel; > Concerning the -devel rpmlint warnings, it is definitely not necessary > as the mentioned files are not at all development files. > nautilus-actions-config is the GUI config tool and > nautilus-actions-new-config is a command line tool to create a config > file that can be imported with the GUI tool or directly with > gconftool-2. > > Concerning the requirement for e2fsprogs-devel, it is needed because I > use the uuid library provided by this package to generate uniq config > identifiers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 16:45:13 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 11:45:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081645.jB8GjDKr000820@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174866 ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2005-12-08 11:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > setuid/setgid executables are not stripped by rpmbuild, see bug 117858. Ah, didn't know that. Thanks! > Workaround: remove those bits in %install and restore in %files using %attr. Yup. IMHO, this should be a SHOULD or even a MUST in the guidelines... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From dan at danny.cz Thu Dec 8 16:54:02 2005 From: dan at danny.cz (Dan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hor=E1k?=) Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 17:54:02 +0100 Subject: rpms/tinyerp/FC-4 tinyerp.spec,1.6,1.7 In-Reply-To: <1134058459.32688.3.camel@ignacio.lan> References: <200512081601.jB8G1RL4012071@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <1134058459.32688.3.camel@ignacio.lan> Message-ID: <1134060842.2547.6.camel@eagle.danny.cz> > > %post server > > +chown -R tinyerp:tinyerp /var/log/tinyerp /var/spool/tinyerp > > + > > /sbin/chkconfig --add tinyerp-server > > Why aren't you using %attr for this? > But I am using %attr already and this was a relict from history, which is not need any more. I should look twice and then work ;-) Dan From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 16:54:53 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 11:54:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174370] Review Request: perl-Data-Buffer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081654.jB8GsrBb002333@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Buffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174370 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |rc040203 at freenet.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-08 11:54 EST ------- Nothing much to say about - APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 17:13:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 12:13:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081713.jB8HD9I7005451@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 ------- Additional Comments From dmaley at redhat.com 2005-12-08 12:13 EST ------- OK thanks, will get that updated. Working on getting the fedora-rpmdevtools loaded which will hopefully assist me in getting all these missing deps resolved. Will post an update here once done ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 17:57:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 12:57:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172677] Review Request: perl-Readonly In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081757.jB8HvXXk012330@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172677 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-08 12:57 EST ------- OK - Thanks, fixed those issues http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/perl-Readonly-1.03-3.src.rpm http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/perl-Readonly.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 18:01:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 13:01:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173053] Review Request: perl-Readonly-XS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081801.jB8I1Ftm012935@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173053 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-08 13:01 EST ------- Ouch. I guess I'm going to have to remove the requires from the other package, which is unfortunate because it means yum won't automagically pull in this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 18:21:03 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 13:21:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172677] Review Request: perl-Readonly In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081821.jB8IL3EW015206@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172677 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-08 13:20 EST ------- Looks good. Approved. You should change the %{?_smp_mflags} in the changelog to %%{?_smp_mflags} though - try "rpm -q --changelog perl-Readonly-1.03-4.src.rpm" to see why. You can do this post-cvs-import if you prefer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 18:34:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 13:34:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172677] Review Request: perl-Readonly In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081834.jB8IYIID017113@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172677 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-08 13:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Looks good. Approved. > > You should change the %{?_smp_mflags} in the changelog to %%{?_smp_mflags} > though - try "rpm -q --changelog perl-Readonly-1.03-4.src.rpm" to see why. You > can do this post-cvs-import if you prefer. > Oh yes - definitely. My bad - I know about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 18:34:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 13:34:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173053] Review Request: perl-Readonly-XS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081834.jB8IYRmJ017163@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173053 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-08 13:34 EST ------- Updated src.rpm and spec file: http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/perl-Readonly-XS-1.04-1.src.rpm http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/perl-Readonly-XS.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 18:49:43 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 13:49:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173053] Review Request: perl-Readonly-XS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081849.jB8Inhko020912@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173053 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-08 13:49 EST ------- - Builds fine in mock (FC4 i386) - Review issues addressed Strictly speaking the buildreq should be perl(Readonly) >= 1.02 (see Makefile.PL) but it doesn't really matter as no older version has ever been released in Extras. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 19:01:40 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 14:01:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172677] Review Request: perl-Readonly In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081901.jB8J1etp022938@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172677 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-08 14:01 EST ------- imported, owners list updated, build succesful in devel branch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 19:01:57 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 14:01:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173053] Review Request: perl-Readonly-XS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081901.jB8J1vRP023011@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173053 Bug 173053 depends on bug 172677, which changed state. Bug 172677 Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172677 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 19:29:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 14:29:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173053] Review Request: perl-Readonly-XS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081929.jB8JTEko028483@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173053 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-08 14:29 EST ------- imported into CVS, owners list update. Build request failing in devel, looks like broken rawhide dependencies (job fails in setting up root) Will close if/when build succesful in FC3/FC4 branch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 19:42:21 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 14:42:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175291] Review Request: perl-PatchReader - utilities to read and manipulate patches and CVS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081942.jB8JgLR4030831@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PatchReader - utilities to read and manipulate patches and CVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175291 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |ville.skytta at iki.fi OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-08 14:42 EST ------- Needswork'n'nitpicks: - Uselessly redefines %{perl_vendor*}, doesn't need %{perl_vendorarch} - Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_*) missing - Doesn't run test suite during build - Redundant %doc for man page - Installs *.pm executable - Off sync with many "best practices" from fedora-rpmdevtools' perl spec template Here's my package which should be ready to roll; "|| :" could be removed from %check and BuildRequires trimmed assuming recent perl packages though: http://cachalot.mine.nu/4/SRPMS/perl-PatchReader-0.9.5-0.2.src.rpm Note: the URLs you posted apparently use some kind of a frame hack which makes them non-wgettable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 19:49:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 14:49:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081949.jB8Jn0Tg031925@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174866 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-08 14:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > setuid/setgid executables are not stripped by rpmbuild, see bug 117858. > > Ah, didn't know that. Thanks! > > > Workaround: remove those bits in %install and restore in %files using %attr. > > Yup. IMHO, this should be a SHOULD or even a MUST in the guidelines... > Agreed - an rpm should be buildable by unprivileged users, which means those bits have to be set with %attr You may also need to patch the Makefile to not set them (to get it to build as a non root user) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 19:58:32 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 14:58:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173053] Review Request: perl-Readonly-XS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512081958.jB8JwW5h001457@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173053 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-08 14:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I guess I'm going to have to remove the requires from the other package, which > is unfortunate because it means yum won't automagically pull in this one. I still think that bundling these two would have been acceptable in this case and would have personally gone that way. Sure, there are arguments why doing so isn't that nice, so it's a matter of the maintainer picking his poison. (Well, when unbundled, some of that pain is outsourced to end users as non-obviousness.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 20:07:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:07:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174510] Review Request: perl-Crypt-DH In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512082007.jB8K7Zg3003055@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-DH https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174510 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |rc040203 at freenet.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-08 15:07 EST ------- > (note to reviewers: %check takes a *long* time) A true understatement ;) May-be you should consider to add a --without checks rpmbuild option (defaulting to --with checks) to ease rebuilding of this package. Also, I presume you also tested this with Math::Pari installed (I haven't), because if I understand this package's working principles correctly, it will pick up and use Math::Pari conditionally, should it be installed. I.e. should Pari be installed, this could cause Heisenbugs, which could be hard to handle. Or are you planning to make Math::Pari a mandatory requirement, once Math::Pari is in FE? Packaging-wise: Package is clean - APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 20:19:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:19:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173053] Review Request: perl-Readonly-XS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512082019.jB8KJcxs005328@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173053 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-08 15:19 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > when unbundled, some of that pain is outsourced to end users as non-obviousness.) Yeah - I agree - users have to know they need to request this to get the speed bump. Too bad rpm doesn't have a "Suggests" tag to install if configured to do so, or ignore if configured to do so. Build machines could ignore it, but end user machines could (by default) install it if available - but not choke and die if not available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 20:44:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:44:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512082044.jB8KiFoJ008861@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174866 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-08 15:44 EST ------- Note that packages that don't insist doing chown/chgrp but do chmod setuid/setgid are unaffected wrt. being buildable by unprivileged users, and the '-'s in eg. %defattr(-,root,root,-) will do the right thing regarding the files' ownership. rpmbuild not stripping setuid/setgid binaries is a different, orthogonal issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 21:33:01 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:33:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175291] Review Request: perl-PatchReader - utilities to read and manipulate patches and CVS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512082133.jB8LX1VT014582@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PatchReader - utilities to read and manipulate patches and CVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175291 ------- Additional Comments From stickster at gmail.com 2005-12-08 16:32 EST ------- Thanks, Ville -- some questions follow so I can learn something out of this: (In reply to comment #1) > - Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_*) missing What does this mean? > - Installs *.pm executable You must have picked this up during the few minutes before I fixed this problem -- the ones up there as of this morning don't have this problem, but thanks. > - Off sync with many "best practices" from fedora-rpmdevtools' perl spec > template Yeah, I should have probably started there instead of appropriating Dag's and starting with it. > Here's my package which should be ready to roll; "|| :" could be removed from > %check and BuildRequires trimmed assuming recent perl packages though: > http://cachalot.mine.nu/4/SRPMS/perl-PatchReader-0.9.5-0.2.src.rpm Do you want me to take this one over then? > Note: the URLs you posted apparently use some kind of a frame hack which makes > them non-wgettable. Yes, but elinks should work fine if you're stuck with a text browser. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 22:22:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 17:22:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175329] New: Review Request: sobby - standalone obby server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175329 Summary: Review Request: sobby - standalone obby server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/sobby.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/sobby-0.3.0-1.rc3.src.rpm Description: Sobby is a standalone obby server -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 22:22:54 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 17:22:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512082222.jB8MMsAE023418@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175329 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From roland at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 22:30:29 2005 From: roland at redhat.com (Roland McGrath) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 14:30:29 -0800 (PST) Subject: lua maintainer In-Reply-To: Panu Matilainen's message of Thursday, 8 December 2005 00:14:37 -0800 Message-ID: <20051208223029.145E51809D8@magilla.sf.frob.com> > Actually it is possible to query BuildRequires with repoquery, but you'll > need to add a separate yum.repos.d entry for FE sources with something > like http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/4/SRPMS/ as > the baseurl. Then you can do > > repoquery --whatrequires lua '*.src' That worked very nicely! Thanks very much. Roland From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 22:39:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 17:39:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175291] Review Request: perl-PatchReader - utilities to read and manipulate patches and CVS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512082239.jB8MdqOp025094@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PatchReader - utilities to read and manipulate patches and CVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175291 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-08 17:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > - Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_*) missing > > What does this mean? Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_X.Y.Z) is used to make the package depend on a version of perl that uses modules from the X.Y.Z-versioned directories (as in eg. /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/X.Y.Z). See the perl spec template for an example how to generate that based on the version of perl the package is built with. > > http://cachalot.mine.nu/4/SRPMS/perl-PatchReader-0.9.5-0.2.src.rpm > > Do you want me to take this one over then? Take what you feel comfortable maintaining in the future. But as said, the above package is IMO in a pretty good shape, and using specfiles based on the spec template makes it easier for folks to review things. > > them non-wgettable. > > Yes, but elinks should work fine if you're stuck with a text browser. OT: not stuck; wget or curl or direct rpm -Uvh just "integrates" better with the way I work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 8 22:45:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 17:45:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174866] Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512082245.jB8MjQ2M026043@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: polypaudio: Improved Linux sound server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174866 ------- Additional Comments From Christian.Iseli at licr.org 2005-12-08 17:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Note that packages that don't insist doing chown/chgrp but do chmod > setuid/setgid are unaffected wrt. being buildable by unprivileged users, and the > '-'s in eg. %defattr(-,root,root,-) will do the right thing regarding the files' > ownership. After building and installing the package, I get (on my FC4, x86_64 box): root: ls -al /usr/bin/polypaudio -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 632416 Dec 8 23:35 /usr/bin/polypaudio So, I stand by my (humble) opinion that the guidelines should mandate no chown/chmod in %install, and use of %attr in %files. This way, it is much clearer which packages introduce suid binaries. > rpmbuild not stripping setuid/setgid binaries is a different, > orthogonal issue. Right. And quite useful as a warning :-) BTW, rpmlint on x86_64 is noisy about rpath: E: polypaudio binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/polypaudio ['/usr/lib64'] E: polypaudio binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/paplay ['/usr/lib64'] E: polypaudio binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pacat ['/usr/lib64'] E: polypaudio binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pactl ['/usr/lib64'] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Fri Dec 9 05:30:05 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:30:05 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051209053005.B8B6C8013@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 3 OpenSceneGraph-0.9.9-4.fc3.1 tinyerp-3.1.1-2.fc3 tinyerp-3.1.1-3.fc3 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 9 05:27:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166550] Review Request: synce-software-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512090527.jB95R2dO016581@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-software-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166550 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2005-12-09 00:26 EST ------- Okay I've gone over the review. 2 blockers 1) Need to add BuildRequires: libgnomeui-devel I fixed this to do my review and located here: http://jef.is-a-geek.com/downloads/synce-software-manager/synce-software-manager-0.9.0-2.src.rpm http://jef.is-a-geek.com/downloads/synce-software-manager/synce-software-manager.spec 2) Need to add a desktop file and associated scriptlet and Requires I haven't fixed this, You'll need to add a .desktop as a SOURCE1 and then use the instructions in http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines for Desktop Files. Please add the desktop file and respin the srpm so I can do a final review of the changes. Full review: - GOOD: builds in mock on an fc4 host system. - GOOD: rpmlint returns clean. - GOOD: The package is named according to the PackageNamingGuidelines. - GOOD: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - GOOD: package meets the PackagingGuidelines. - GOOD: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license (MIT) - GOOD: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - GOOD: The source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, COPYING and is included in %doc. - GOOD: The spec file is written American English. - GOOD: The spec file for the package is be legible. - GOOD: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source. - Fixed: The package must successfully compiles and build into binary rpms on fc4 i386 and fc-devel i386. Needed to add BuildRequires: libgnomeui-devel - GOOD: package does not contain any BuildRequires that are listed in the exceptions section of PackagingGuidelines. - Fixed: All other Build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. Need to add BuildRequires: libgnomeui-devel - GOOD: Uses the %find_lang macro. - GOOD: No shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - GOOD: package owns all directories that it creates. - GOOD: package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - GOOD: Permissions on files must be set properly. - GOOD: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - GOOD: package consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of PackagingGuidelines. - GOOD: package contains code, or permissable content. - GOOD: No large documentation files. - GOOD: %doc files do not affect the runtime of the application. - GOOD: No header files or static libraries. - GOOD: No files used by pkgconfig (.pc files). - GOOD: No library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1) - BAD: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of PackagingGuidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Fri Dec 9 05:34:36 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:34:36 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051209053436.3D1018013@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 6 OpenSceneGraph-0.9.9-4.fc4.1 baobab-2.2.2-1.fc4 gquilt-0.15-1.fc4 rt3-3.4.4-11.fc4 tinyerp-3.1.1-2.fc4 tinyerp-3.1.1-3.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Fri Dec 9 05:43:58 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:43:58 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051209054358.1A7568013@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 13 Inventor-2.1.5-14.fc5 Inventor-2.1.5-15.fc5 abiword-2.4.1-4.fc5 antiword-0.37-1 darcs-1.0.5-1.fc5 fdupes-1.40-5.fc5 gquilt-0.15-1.fc5 irssi-0.8.10-0.2.rc8.fc5 openvpn-2.1-0.4.beta7.fc5 perl-Data-Buffer-0.04-1.fc5 perl-File-BOM-0.11-1.fc5 perl-Readonly-1.03-4.fc5 rt3-3.4.4-11.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 9 07:57:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 02:57:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174370] Review Request: perl-Data-Buffer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512090757.jB97vRrh004336@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Buffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174370 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-09 02:57 EST ------- Built and released for rawhide. Will do FC3/4 builds when cvs branches are done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 9 07:57:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 02:57:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174368] Review Request: perl-Crypt-DSA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512090757.jB97vYeM004385@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-DSA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174368 Bug 174368 depends on bug 174370, which changed state. Bug 174370 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Buffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174370 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 9 08:10:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 03:10:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168578] Review Request: perl-Class-ErrorHandler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512090810.jB98AkDA007145@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-ErrorHandler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168578 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-09 03:10 EST ------- Ping - Steve, it's more than 2 months since this package has been approved. I am sorry, but don't see any other possibility but to close this Request as FAILED shouldn't you respond within 1 week from now, or somebody else volunter to take over maintainership of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 9 08:20:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 03:20:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166550] Review Request: synce-software-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512090820.jB98K9QQ008912@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-software-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166550 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-09 03:19 EST ------- Here you go :) http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/synce-software-manager-0.9.0-3.src.rpm http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/synce-software-manager.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From paul at city-fan.org Fri Dec 9 08:38:25 2005 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 08:38:25 +0000 Subject: CVSROOT syncmail,1.1,1.2 In-Reply-To: <200512082135.jB8LZxql022511@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> References: <200512082135.jB8LZxql022511@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1134117505.12691.16.camel@laurel.intra.city-fan.org> On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 16:35 -0500, Elliot Lee wrote: > Author: sopwith > > Update of /cvs/devel/CVSROOT > In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22492/CVSROOT-ext-devel > > Modified Files: > syncmail > Log Message: > fix syncmail Seems to still need fixing: $ cvs commit perl-Crypt-DH.spec For more information on using the Fedora CVS repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs Enter passphrase for key '/home/paul/.ssh/id_dsa': **** Access allowed: pghmcfc is in ACL for rpms/perl-Crypt-DH/devel. Checking in perl-Crypt-DH.spec; /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Crypt-DH/devel/perl-Crypt-DH.spec,v <-- perl-Crypt-DH.spec new revision: 1.2; previous revision: 1.1 done Running syncmail... Mailing cvsextras at fedora.redhat.com... ...syncmail done. cvs diff: [08:32:28] waiting for pghmcfc's lock in /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Crypt-DH/devel Running syncmail... Mailing relnotes at fedoraproject.org... Traceback (most recent call last): File "/cvs/extras/CVSROOT/syncmail", line 314, in ? main() File "/cvs/extras/CVSROOT/syncmail", line 308, in main blast_mail(subject, people) File "/cvs/extras/CVSROOT/syncmail", line 207, in blast_mail if I not in commit_message: TypeError: 'in ' requires character as left operand cvs diff: [08:32:58] obtained lock in /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Crypt-DH/devel $ Paul. -- Paul Howarth From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 9 08:45:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 03:45:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174510] Review Request: perl-Crypt-DH In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512090845.jB98jTZo012340@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-DH https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174510 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-09 03:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > (note to reviewers: %check takes a *long* time) > A true understatement ;) > > > May-be you should consider to add a --without checks rpmbuild option (defaulting > to --with checks) to ease rebuilding of this package. Added in cvs. > Also, I presume you also tested this with Math::Pari installed (I haven't), > because if I understand this package's working principles correctly, it will > pick up and use Math::Pari conditionally, should it be installed. I hadn't actually built Math::Pari at the time I submitted this package, but I've tested it since. Rather surprisingly, neither Math::Pari nor Math::GMP seem to speed up the test suite by any noticeable amount. > I.e. should Pari be installed, this could cause Heisenbugs, which could be hard > to handle. Or are you planning to make Math::Pari a mandatory requirement, once > Math::Pari is in FE? I'll probably do that, yes. > Packaging-wise: Package is clean - APPROVED Imported and building. Let's see if the buildsystem times out the test suite... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 9 10:23:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 05:23:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174510] Review Request: perl-Crypt-DH In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512091023.jB9ANxV6021731@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-DH https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174510 paul at city-fan.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-09 05:23 EST ------- Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 9 10:25:04 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 05:25:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166550] Review Request: synce-software-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512091025.jB9AP4qO021845@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-software-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166550 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-09 05:24 EST ------- I'll help testing, I have a wince device. But I have little time at the moment, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From wart at kobold.org Fri Dec 9 17:02:07 2005 From: wart at kobold.org (Wart) Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 09:02:07 -0800 Subject: Packages based on CVS sources Message-ID: <4399B88F.80004@kobold.org> What is the policy for building packages for software that does not yet have upstream source tarballs, but only maintains the software in CVS? The specific case that I'm looking at is the TclPro software suite at tclpro.sourceforge.net. I've contacted the developers about making a source release but haven't gotten a reply yet. Am I allowed to pull the CVS sources and make my own source release? Obviously, I would rather that this is all done upstream, but in case they aren't responsive to such requests, what are my choices? --Mike From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 9 17:51:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 12:51:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512091751.jB9HpP3r019896@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-09 12:51 EST ------- /etc/ppp/chap-secrets.example is not good filename. PPP potentially can have such a file itself. Either don't use it at all (as PPP should have its own docs about it), or use "l2tp" in the filename (i.e. chap-secrets.example-l2tp ) IMHO, for security reasons, it is better to ship /etc/l2tpd/l2tpd.conf with "local-address" set to 127.0.0.1 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rdieter at math.unl.edu Fri Dec 9 17:49:53 2005 From: rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter) Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 11:49:53 -0600 Subject: Packages based on CVS sources In-Reply-To: <4399B88F.80004@kobold.org> References: <4399B88F.80004@kobold.org> Message-ID: Wart wrote: > What is the policy for building packages for software that does not yet > have upstream source tarballs, but only maintains the software in CVS? Makes it impossible to verify upstream sources for review. For new packages, definite bad idea. > Am I allowed to pull the CVS sources and make my own source release? > Obviously, I would rather that this is all done upstream, but in case > they aren't responsive to such requests, what are my choices? The only case I can think of that *may* be acceptable: to update an existing package, with grave bug(s), but that should be a rare exception. -- rex From j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl Fri Dec 9 18:28:53 2005 From: j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl (Hans de Goede) Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:28:53 +0100 Subject: Packages based on CVS sources In-Reply-To: References: <4399B88F.80004@kobold.org> Message-ID: <4399CCE5.9020407@hhs.nl> Rex Dieter wrote: > Wart wrote: >> What is the policy for building packages for software that does not yet >> have upstream source tarballs, but only maintains the software in CVS? > > Makes it impossible to verify upstream sources for review. For new > packages, definite bad idea. > Erm, Why does that make it hard to verify the sources? Download srpm, extract tar gz made by packager from CVS checkout. Do a cvs checkout yourself, next do a diff -ur --exclude=CVS, and there you have your comparision. >> Am I allowed to pull the CVS sources and make my own source release? >> Obviously, I would rather that this is all done upstream, but in case >> they aren't responsive to such requests, what are my choices? > > The only case I can think of that *may* be acceptable: to update an > existing package, with grave bug(s), but that should be a rare exception. > Again, why? I have no personal interest in tclpro (I don't even know what it is). But I see no reason why a CVS checkout can't be build into a package, as long as you put the commands used todo the checkout in a comment in the spec file all is well. Regards, Hans From pmatilai at laiskiainen.org Fri Dec 9 18:22:22 2005 From: pmatilai at laiskiainen.org (Panu Matilainen) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:22:22 -0800 (PST) Subject: Packages based on CVS sources In-Reply-To: References: <4399B88F.80004@kobold.org> Message-ID: On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Rex Dieter wrote: > Wart wrote: >> What is the policy for building packages for software that does not yet >> have upstream source tarballs, but only maintains the software in CVS? > > Makes it impossible to verify upstream sources for review. For new packages, > definite bad idea. How is it impossible? Just documenting (in spec) how the source was retrieved, eg 'cvs export ' allows reviewing against upstream sources. - Panu - From wart at kobold.org Fri Dec 9 18:42:21 2005 From: wart at kobold.org (Michael Thomas) Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:42:21 -0800 Subject: Packages based on CVS sources In-Reply-To: <4399CCE5.9020407@hhs.nl> References: <4399B88F.80004@kobold.org> <4399CCE5.9020407@hhs.nl> Message-ID: <4399D00D.3050502@kobold.org> Hans de Goede wrote: > > > Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Wart wrote: >> >>> What is the policy for building packages for software that does not yet >>> have upstream source tarballs, but only maintains the software in CVS? >> >> >> Makes it impossible to verify upstream sources for review. For new >> packages, definite bad idea. >> > > Erm, > > Why does that make it hard to verify the sources? Download srpm, extract > tar gz made by packager from CVS checkout. Do a cvs checkout yourself, > next do a diff -ur --exclude=CVS, and there you have your comparision. I hadn't thought of that... >>> Am I allowed to pull the CVS sources and make my own source release? >>> Obviously, I would rather that this is all done upstream, but in case >>> they aren't responsive to such requests, what are my choices? >> >> >> The only case I can think of that *may* be acceptable: to update an >> existing package, with grave bug(s), but that should be a rare exception. >> > > Again, why? I have no personal interest in tclpro (I don't even know > what it is). It's a graphical debugger for Tcl scripts. It was open-sourced when the company that developed it (Scriptics / Ajuba) was acquired by Interwoven in 2000. A commercial version with updates was later released by ActiveState. Not much work has gone into the open-source version since then, yet it's still functional and very useful. But I see no reason why a CVS checkout can't be build into > a package, as long as you put the commands used todo the checkout in a > comment in the spec file all is well. I'll do that for now until I get some sort of response from the upstream developers. There's still a lot of work to be done before I'm ready to submit it as a new package. Hopefully there will be upstream tarballs by then. Thanks, --Mike From Matt_Domsch at dell.com Fri Dec 9 18:50:24 2005 From: Matt_Domsch at dell.com (Matt Domsch) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 12:50:24 -0600 Subject: Packages based on CVS sources In-Reply-To: <4399D00D.3050502@kobold.org> References: <4399B88F.80004@kobold.org> <4399CCE5.9020407@hhs.nl> <4399D00D.3050502@kobold.org> Message-ID: <20051209185024.GC29231@lists.us.dell.com> On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:42:21AM -0800, Michael Thomas wrote: > But I see no reason why a CVS checkout can't be build into > > a package, as long as you put the commands used todo the checkout in a > > comment in the spec file all is well. > > I'll do that for now until I get some sort of response from the upstream > developers. There's still a lot of work to be done before I'm ready to > submit it as a new package. Hopefully there will be upstream tarballs > by then. Be sure to read about Snapshot packages in PackageNamingGuidelines. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines#head-975237cdcb9aa7775601adeaaccbc70290f69812 -- Matt Domsch Software Architect Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com From rdieter at math.unl.edu Fri Dec 9 19:15:35 2005 From: rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter) Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:15:35 -0600 Subject: Packages based on CVS sources In-Reply-To: References: <4399B88F.80004@kobold.org> Message-ID: Panu Matilainen wrote: > On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Wart wrote: >>> What is the policy for building packages for software that does not yet >>> have upstream source tarballs, but only maintains the software in CVS? >> Makes it impossible to verify upstream sources for review. For new >> packages, definite bad idea. > How is it impossible? Impossible in the classic "verifying tarball checksums" sense is what I meant. IMO, in general, if upstream developers are lazy/hesitant to make a formal release, it shouldn't be packaged. -- Rex From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 9 19:26:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:26:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512091926.jB9JQF7S000536@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173105 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2005-12-09 14:26 EST ------- ok, that all makes sense I guess... So, the package License should be "LGPL". With that fixed, I see no other blockers... APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From mpeters at mac.com Fri Dec 9 20:21:46 2005 From: mpeters at mac.com (Michael A. Peters) Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:21:46 -0800 Subject: Packages based on CVS sources In-Reply-To: References: <4399B88F.80004@kobold.org> Message-ID: <1134159706.2801.10.camel@locolhost.localdomain> On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 13:15 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Impossible in the classic "verifying tarball checksums" sense is what I > meant. > > IMO, in general, if upstream developers are lazy/hesitant to make a > formal release, it shouldn't be packaged. I agree. The problem is that CVS co can be awesome one day, horrible the next. I do think that if a project is close to an actual release or official snapshot, a cvs co in the development branch is fine. From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr Fri Dec 9 19:53:58 2005 From: eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr (Eric Tanguy) Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 20:53:58 +0100 Subject: Build problem in devel ? Message-ID: <1134158038.2983.15.camel@bureau.maison> I just try to launch a job and i obtained this error : http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/1654-ircd-hybrid-7.2.0-2.fc5/x86_64/root.log What's the problem ? Thanks Eric From dcbw at redhat.com Fri Dec 9 21:22:05 2005 From: dcbw at redhat.com (Dan Williams) Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:22:05 -0500 Subject: Build problem in devel ? In-Reply-To: <1134158038.2983.15.camel@bureau.maison> References: <1134158038.2983.15.camel@bureau.maison> Message-ID: <1134163325.11704.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 20:53 +0100, Eric Tanguy wrote: > I just try to launch a job and i obtained this error : > http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/1654-ircd-hybrid-7.2.0-2.fc5/x86_64/root.log > What's the problem ? > Thanks > Eric Rawhide is inconsistent. You can't even do a 'yum upgrade' right now due to breakage with glibc. Dan From skvidal at phy.duke.edu Fri Dec 9 21:38:39 2005 From: skvidal at phy.duke.edu (seth vidal) Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:38:39 -0500 Subject: Build problem in devel ? In-Reply-To: <1134163325.11704.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1134158038.2983.15.camel@bureau.maison> <1134163325.11704.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1134164319.30757.49.camel@cutter> On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 16:22 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 20:53 +0100, Eric Tanguy wrote: > > I just try to launch a job and i obtained this error : > > http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/1654-ircd-hybrid-7.2.0-2.fc5/x86_64/root.log > > What's the problem ? > > Thanks > > Eric > > Rawhide is inconsistent. You can't even do a 'yum upgrade' right now > due to breakage with glibc. and we're going to have to figure out a solution to the comps.xml format changing in FC5, too. much pain. -sv From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr Fri Dec 9 22:06:02 2005 From: eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr (Eric Tanguy) Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 23:06:02 +0100 Subject: Build problem in devel ? In-Reply-To: <1134164319.30757.49.camel@cutter> References: <1134158038.2983.15.camel@bureau.maison> <1134163325.11704.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1134164319.30757.49.camel@cutter> Message-ID: <1134165962.2983.17.camel@bureau.maison> Le vendredi 09 d?cembre 2005 ? 16:38 -0500, seth vidal a ?crit : > On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 16:22 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 20:53 +0100, Eric Tanguy wrote: > > > I just try to launch a job and i obtained this error : > > > http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/1654-ircd-hybrid-7.2.0-2.fc5/x86_64/root.log > > > What's the problem ? > > > Thanks > > > Eric > > > > Rawhide is inconsistent. You can't even do a 'yum upgrade' right now > > due to breakage with glibc. > > and we're going to have to figure out a solution to the comps.xml format > changing in FC5, too. > > much pain. > > -sv > > I have also some errors messages : [tanguy at bureau cvs-fedora-extras]$ ./common/cvs-import.sh -b FC-4 /home/tanguy/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ircd-hybrid-7.2.0-2.src.rpm Checking out the modules file... For more information on using the Fedora CVS repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs For more information on using the Fedora CVS repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs Module 'ircd-hybrid' already exists... Checking out module: 'ircd-hybrid' For more information on using the Fedora CVS repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs Unpacking source package: ircd-hybrid-7.2.0-2.src.rpm... For more information on using the Fedora CVS repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs R ircd-hybrid-7.1.3-openssl.diff L ircd-hybrid-7.2.0.tgz U ircd-hybrid.spec Checking : ircd-hybrid-7.2.0.tgz on https://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/repo/extras/upload.cgi... This file (e3c716fef0c62eaba147df06f32ea87d ircd-hybrid-7.2.0.tgz) is already uploaded Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the new ./sources file For more information on using the Fedora CVS repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs M sources M .cvsignore For more information on using the Fedora CVS repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs cvs commit... For more information on using the Fedora CVS repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs cvs diff: [22:03:54] waiting for tanguy's lock in /cvs/extras/rpms/ircd-hybrid Traceback (most recent call last): File "/cvs/extras/CVSROOT/syncmail", line 314, in ? main() File "/cvs/extras/CVSROOT/syncmail", line 308, in main blast_mail(subject, people) File "/cvs/extras/CVSROOT/syncmail", line 207, in blast_mail if I not in commit_message: TypeError: 'in ' requires character as left operand cvs diff: [22:04:14] waiting for tanguy's lock in /cvs/extras/rpms/ircd-hybrid/FC-4 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/cvs/extras/CVSROOT/syncmail", line 314, in ? main() File "/cvs/extras/CVSROOT/syncmail", line 308, in main blast_mail(subject, people) File "/cvs/extras/CVSROOT/syncmail", line 207, in blast_mail if I not in commit_message: TypeError: 'in ' requires character as left operand cvs diff: [22:04:24] obtained lock in /cvs/extras/rpms/ircd-hybrid From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 9 22:25:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 17:25:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512092225.jB9MPRui026094@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2005-12-09 17:25 EST ------- I've changed chap-secrets.example to chap-secrets.example-l2tp. I do not know what you mean with "local-address". There are two options that resemble your word: listen-addr: the bind address, default to INADDRANY local-ip: the ip address for the P-t-P link on the l2tp server end (needs to be seperately configured by admin) if local-ip is not configured properly, after authentication packets will get dropped cause the l2tpd cannot sent/receive them. no risk, it just won't work. listen-addr could be defined to listen on the example local-ip, but then people need to configure port forwarding between interfaces. Most will not do this, even though it is more secure. (It's really tricky, especially with IPsec and the NETKEY-specific weirdness that comes from it). It is far easier to just mark ESP and UDP 500/4500 packets and only allow marked packets to reach port 1701 (l2tp port). This ensures no one but the IPsec authenticated users can start to try and authenticate with l2tp. Setting any of these to 127.0.0.1 will confuse users a lot. New src.rpm and spec file pushed: ftp://ftp.openswan.org/l2tpd/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/l2tpd.spec ftp://ftp.openswan.org/l2tpd/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/l2tpd-0.69.20051030-15.src.rpm (I am still using high releases because otherwise the rpms in this correspondence would not be incremental in their release) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 9 23:14:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 18:14:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512092314.jB9NEkIT032737@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 ------- Additional Comments From dmaley at redhat.com 2005-12-09 18:14 EST ------- OK I got the fedora-rpmdevtools installed and believe I've now captured all the necessary BuildRequires packages. Updated SPEC is at the same location: SPEC: http://homer.homelinux.net/RPMS/wavbreaker.spec SRPM: http://homer.homelinux.net/RPMS/wavbreaker-0.6.1-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 01:34:03 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 20:34:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168310] Review Request: swish-e In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512100134.jBA1Y3wo012810@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: swish-e https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168310 ------- Additional Comments From bkyoung at users.sourceforge.net 2005-12-09 20:33 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: swish-e.spec.23 SRPM Name or Url: swish-e-2.4.2-23.fc5.src. FIXED: Patches are now relative, and not absolute. The Swish-e RPM package, in its current state, adds "simple" search capabilities to Fedora (Thanks to patient reviewers and testers for finding many errors that required correction.) The reason for inclusion into Fedora, however, is the swish-e-default subpackage. Thanks to a set of reasonable standards (which we all benefit from), packages install documentation into a predictable location. The swish-e-default subpackage processes these directories, and, thru the Swish-e httpd cgi interface, provides users a means to search for terms. What is not clear from the guidelines is if additional functionality should be provided as a subpackage, or a completely separate package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 02:17:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 21:17:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175425] New: Review Request: tile - Modern versions of Tk widget set Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175425 Summary: Review Request: tile - Modern versions of Tk widget set Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tile.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tile-0.7.2-1.src.rpm MD5SUMs: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/MD5SUM.asc Description: The Tile Widget Set is an experimental reimplementation of some of the core Tk widgets. This packages adds theming and other modern features to the core Tk widget set. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 02:17:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 21:17:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512100217.jBA2HxmV016372@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175425 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 02:21:45 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 21:21:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175426] New: Review Request: tkcon - Tcl console shell Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175426 Summary: Review Request: tkcon - Tcl console shell Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tkcon.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tkcon-2.4-1.src.rpm MD5SUMs: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/MD5SUM.asc Description: tkcon is a replacement for the standard console that comes with Tk (on Windows/Mac, but also works on Unix). The console itself provides many more features than the standard console. tkcon works on all platforms where Tcl/Tk is available. It is meant primarily to aid one when working with the little details inside tcl and tk, giving Unix users the GUI console provided by default in the Mac and Windows Tk. This should be a pretty quick and easy review as the package has nothing to build and only a single file to install aside from documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 02:21:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 21:21:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512100221.jBA2LxEn016572@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175426 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From mattdm at mattdm.org Sat Dec 10 03:16:04 2005 From: mattdm at mattdm.org (Matthew Miller) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 22:16:04 -0500 Subject: Build problem in devel ? In-Reply-To: <1134164319.30757.49.camel@cutter> References: <1134158038.2983.15.camel@bureau.maison> <1134163325.11704.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1134164319.30757.49.camel@cutter> Message-ID: <20051210031604.GA27765@jadzia.bu.edu> On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 04:38:39PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > and we're going to have to figure out a solution to the comps.xml format > changing in FC5, too. > much pain. Oh geez, I missed that. What's going on there? -- Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org Boston University Linux ------> From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 04:00:55 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 23:00:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174486] Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512100400.jBA40tTD027103@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-09 23:00 EST ------- - rpmlint says: W: libopensync no-version-in-last-changelog W: libopensync conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/ld.so.conf.d/libopensync-32.conf W: libopensync-debuginfo no-version-in-last-changelog E: libopensync-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/libopensync-0.18/opensync/opensync_internals.h E: libopensync-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/libopensync-0.18/opensync/opensync.h E: libopensync-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/libopensync-0.18/osengine/osengine_engine.c E: libopensync-debuginfo script-without-shellbang /usr/src/debug/libopensync-0.18/opensync/opensync_env.c W: libopensync-devel no-version-in-last-changelog * No, script-without-shellbang for debuginfo source isn't very important, though a simple chmod -x on the files would fix it. * ignoring changelog with the line break * that conf file isn't going to be editing by user, ignoring noreplace - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (LGPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC4 i386 - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Take a look at: Minor: %{_datadir}/opensync directory empty, somewhat useless Remove useless dir and chmod -x source and this is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 04:13:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 23:13:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173182] Review Request: kismet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512100413.jBA4DQCq028354@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173182 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-09 23:13 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 165314 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 04:13:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 23:13:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512100413.jBA4Dcxe028409@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chabotc at xs4all.nl ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-09 23:13 EST ------- *** Bug 173182 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From skvidal at phy.duke.edu Sat Dec 10 08:36:58 2005 From: skvidal at phy.duke.edu (seth vidal) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 03:36:58 -0500 Subject: Build problem in devel ? In-Reply-To: <20051210031604.GA27765@jadzia.bu.edu> References: <1134158038.2983.15.camel@bureau.maison> <1134163325.11704.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1134164319.30757.49.camel@cutter> <20051210031604.GA27765@jadzia.bu.edu> Message-ID: <1134203818.2183.38.camel@cutter> On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 22:16 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 04:38:39PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > and we're going to have to figure out a solution to the comps.xml format > > changing in FC5, too. > > much pain. > > Oh geez, I missed that. What's going on there? > > We're trying to simplify it's functionality both to make the code easier and to make it more obvious for first time users of the groups functionality. So we're punting the nested groups functionality (groups of groups) we still have a container for things containing multiple groups but those aren't allowed to nest themselves, either. it's still being fleshed out right now but the long and short of it is that the file format changes a bit. -sv From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 12:12:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 07:12:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175433] New: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://ensc.de/fedora/tor.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://ensc.de/fedora/tor-0.1.0.15-1.src.rpm Description: Tor is a connection-based low-latency anonymous communication system. Applications connect to the local Tor proxy using the SOCKS protocol. The local proxy chooses a path through a set of relays, in which each relay knows its predecessor and successor, but no others. Traffic flowing down the circuit is unwrapped by a symmetric key at each relay, which reveals the downstream relay. Warnings: Tor does no protocol cleaning. That means there is a danger that application protocols and associated programs can be induced to reveal information about the initiator. Tor depends on Privoxy and similar protocol cleaners to solve this problem. This is alpha code, and is even more likely than released code to have anonymity-spoiling bugs. The present network is very small -- this further reduces the strength of the anonymity provided. Tor is not presently suitable for high-stakes anonymity. This package provides the "tor" program, which serves as both a client and a relay node. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 12:12:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 07:12:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512101212.jBACCnOs000333@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 15:53:30 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:53:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] New: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://ensc.de/fedora/smart.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://ensc.de/fedora/smart-0.40-1.src.rpm The Smart Package Manager project has the ambitious objective of creating smart and portable algorithms for solving adequately the problem of managing software upgrading and installation. This tool works in all major distributions, and will bring notable advantages over native tools currently in use (APT, APT-RPM, YUM, URPMI, etc). ============ A quick HOWTO to make it work with Fedora: 1. LANG=C smart channel --add os type=rpm-md alias="Fedora Core 4" \ baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/4/i386/os 2. smart update 3. smart upgrade -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 15:53:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 10:53:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512101553.jBAFrkjt016219@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175438 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 16:51:48 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:51:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169345] Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512101651.jBAGpmbY020508@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: SEC - Simple Event Correlator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169345 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-10 11:51 EST ------- Is this your first package? If it is you'll need a sponsor. rpmlint complains about: W: sec incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.3.2-4 2.3.2-4%{_my_ext} E: sec non-standard-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/sec.1.gz 0744 W: sec log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/sec.log W: sec dangerous-command-in-%post rpm W: sec dangerous-command-in-%preun rpm W: sec dangerous-command-in-%postun rpm E: sec no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/sec E: sec no-chkconfig-line /etc/rc.d/init.d/sec Some things to look at: - release has an undeclared macro in it. Try "4%{?dist}" instead. - Group is tricky, Applications/Text works well too. - man page should be non executable - add status command and chkconfig line to init script Dangerous rpm commands are false alarms, they're commented out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 20:51:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 15:51:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512102051.jBAKpYPD005175@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |ville.skytta at iki.fi OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-10 15:51 EST ------- Initial comments, full review after hearing your thoughts on these: Subpackage naming: how about smart-gtk and smart-tui? "tui" is used eg. by many system-config-* packages for their text UI's, and plain "gtk" sounds better than "uigtk" to me. Further, what benefit is there in splitting the text UI from the main package in the first place, does it add some dependencies or...? How about packaging contrib/ksmarttray? (%package -n ksmarttray) Some 3rd party packagers package contrib/smart-update too, would that be useful? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 21:07:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:07:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512102107.jBAL7Gr8006160@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-10 16:07 EST ------- I agree with changing the GUI subpackage to -gtk, but what benefit does having the text-mode UI in a separate subpackage give? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sat Dec 10 21:15:43 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:15:43 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051210211543.EF4158013@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 3 cernlib-2005-8.fc3.3 dkms-2.0.9-1.fc3 ircd-hybrid-7.2.0-2.fc3 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 21:13:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:13:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512102113.jBALDCMM006434@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 ------- Additional Comments From dmaley at redhat.com 2005-12-10 16:13 EST ------- D'oh! Looks like I still need to add a couple Requires. According to the project homepage (http://huli.org/wavbreaker/info.html) GTK+ >= 2.0 and libxml >= 2.0 are required. And for FC I believe this should be gtk2 and libxml2 however I question whether I need to have these versioned or not? Any guidance on this is greatly appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 21:24:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:24:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512102124.jBALOdpL007277@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-10 16:24 EST ------- You shouldn't need to add them as Requires. rpmbuild picks up what Requires it can from the executables in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sat Dec 10 21:36:54 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:36:54 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051210213654.DB3298013@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 6 amarok-1.3.7-1.fc4 cernlib-2005-8.fc4.2 dkms-2.0.9-1.fc4 ircd-hybrid-7.2.0-2.fc4 torcs-1.2.4-1.fc4 xmms-1.2.10-18.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 21:39:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:39:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512102139.jBALdZVr008377@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-10 16:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > what benefit does having > the text-mode UI in a separate subpackage give? Yep, I asked that too in comment 1 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sat Dec 10 21:46:01 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:46:01 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051210214601.5E4B58013@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 3 abcde-2.3.99-1.fc5 fedora-usermgmt-0.8-1 perl-Crypt-DH-0.06-2.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 21:57:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:57:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170372] Review Request: moodle: A Course Management System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512102157.jBALvSBm010474@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moodle: A Course Management System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170372 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-10 16:57 EST ------- Updated. I put the editor's spell check plugin into a separate package disabled by default since it needs Text::Aspell. http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/moodle.spec http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/moodle-1.5.3-1.src.rpm (In reply to comment #6) > E: moodle non-standard-uid /var/www/moodle/data apache > E: moodle non-standard-gid /var/www/moodle/data apache Moodle needs to store data on the filesystem. > E: moodle non-executable-script /var/www/moodle/web/admin/process_email.php 0644 Just a file with a shebang line, no biggie. > E: moodle non-executable-script /var/www/moodle/web/mod/chat/chatd.php 0644 Interesting, a chat daemon written in PHP. I'm not sure how changing this will impact Moodle, although I feel it can be done easily enough once the package has been imported. > E: moodle non-executable-script /var/www/moodle/web/mod/wiki/ewiki/fragments/mkhuge 0644 I could easily enough remove this, I suppose. Your call. > E: moodle htaccess-file /var/www/moodle/web/auth/shibboleth/.htaccess Needed for shibboleth auth, AFAICT. > W: moodle non-conffile-in-etc /etc/cron.d/moodle > None of the localization pacakges have docs, and a few have zero length php file. There are no non-English docs AFAICS. And I'm relutant to remove the zero-length files as I don't know how it will affect Moodle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 22:01:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 17:01:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512102201.jBAM1StE010819@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 ------- Additional Comments From denisleroy at yahoo.com 2005-12-10 17:01 EST ------- Successfull build in mock for FC-3, FC-4 and devel. I would suggest you add a %{?dist} tag after the release version if you plan on submitting it for all 3. Also, as Ignacio said, the Requires in comment #7 are not necessary. Otherwise it looks good. I'll accept the package, though i think you first need to be sponsored and unfortunately i can't help you with that. I noticed wavbreaker has problem playing sound through Alsa, the sound is all jittery and weird (is fine with OSS). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 22:33:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 17:33:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173040] Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512102233.jBAMXY51012622@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173040 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at newmail.ru 2005-12-10 17:33 EST ------- > I would recommend disabling valgrind explicitly > during rpmbuild for this reason. Added %ifarch check. > Also do you intend on submitting a fuse-encfs package? Yes. More to say - I trying to put rlog-package into extras especially because of fuse-encfs :). Spec Name or Url: http://paula.comtv.ru/rlog.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://paula.comtv.ru/rlog-1.3.7-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 22:54:04 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 17:54:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175291] Review Request: perl-PatchReader - utilities to read and manipulate patches and CVS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512102254.jBAMs4BF013978@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-PatchReader - utilities to read and manipulate patches and CVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175291 ------- Additional Comments From stickster at gmail.com 2005-12-10 17:53 EST ------- OK, refer to new spec and SRPM for 0.9.5-2: http://rpm.frields.org/extras-testing/perl-PatchReader/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 10 23:30:48 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:30:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512102330.jBANUmM9016817@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 mattdm at mattdm.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mattdm at mattdm.org ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2005-12-10 18:30 EST ------- Any chance of naming the package "smartpm" (a la "smartpm.org")? This is very confusingly close to the SMART technology used in hard drives (smartmontools package).... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 00:06:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 19:06:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174486] Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512110006.jBB06Rd3021958@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-10 19:06 EST ------- Thanks for your time. Just with the two things you pointed out: the empty dir is owned by libopensync because it is the dir all plugins will install into an thus the cleanest way is to have it owned by libopensync as sort of the base package. For the chmod part: .c and .h file should never ever be +x (executable) imho. If you take a look at the source tree these are marked executable (for no good reason) so I have added a chmod -x to the dir which should get rid of these errors. http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/libopensync.spec http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/libopensync-0.18-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 01:40:04 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:40:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172755] Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512110140.jBB1e4FX031271@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172755 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2005-12-10 20:39 EST ------- files not avialable anymore -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 01:50:36 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 20:50:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172755] Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512110150.jBB1oaBV000424@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172755 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2005-12-10 20:50 EST ------- sorry about that, check again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 02:14:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 21:14:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170504] Review Request: makebootfat - Utility for creation bootable FAT disk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512110214.jBB2EI6t003214@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makebootfat - Utility for creation bootable FAT disk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170504 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-10 21:14 EST ------- - rpmlint says: E: makebootfat only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. Probably a good idea, these are mbrs and such, not shared objects and not architecture dependent. Move this. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC4 i386 - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file It would be a good idea to show upstream the doc you wrote. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 05:07:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:07:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175463] New: Review Request: tclsoap - SOAP support for Tcl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175463 Summary: Review Request: tclsoap - SOAP support for Tcl Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tclsoap.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tclsoap-1.6.7-1.src.rpm MD5SUMs: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/MD5SUM.asc Description: Provides support for building clients and servers for the SOAP remote procedure call protocol from Tcl. When combined with tclhttpd (already in FE) this provides a nice SOAP server platform for Tcl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 05:07:32 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:07:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512110507.jBB57WuI016694@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175463 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 06:29:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 01:29:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174783] Review Request: gruler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512110629.jBB6T8oq022014@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gruler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174783 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2005-12-11 01:28 EST ------- Updated spec: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gruler/gruler.spec Updated SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gruler/gruler-0.6-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 07:58:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 02:58:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174486] Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512110758.jBB7w9MK027844@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-11 02:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > > the empty dir is owned by libopensync because it is the dir all plugins will > install into an thus the cleanest way is to have it owned by libopensync as sort > of the base package. > OK. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 07:59:04 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 02:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174783] Review Request: gruler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512110759.jBB7x4kq027949@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gruler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174783 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-11 02:58 EST ------- NEEDSWORK: * Blocker: Package doesn't honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS. (Origin is a but in this package's configure script. It overrides CFLAGS) * Cosmetics: rpmlint gruler-0.6-2.i386.rpm E: gruler zero-length /usr/share/doc/gruler-0.6/NEWS E: gruler zero-length /usr/share/doc/gruler-0.6/AUTHORS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 08:42:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 03:42:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512110842.jBB8gVRI032408@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 ------- Additional Comments From adrian at lisas.de 2005-12-11 03:42 EST ------- The build requires for pango-devel and glib2-devel are not necessary as these are already required by gtk2-devel. The following are not blockers: I cannot notice any problems when playing sound through alsa and I also think that for Fedora the audio output should default to alsa and not oss. I would also like to see the Name and Comment in the desktop file to start with uppercase letters because that is the way all the other applications do it in my menu. It would also be nice to have a MimeType added to the desktop file to be able to start wavbreaker directly from nautils (don't forget to update the desktop database if you do this: see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets) It would be also nice if %setup would have the "-q" as most other Fedora packages have. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From dan at danny.cz Sun Dec 11 10:21:22 2005 From: dan at danny.cz (Dan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hor=E1k?=) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 11:21:22 +0100 Subject: fixed order when installing packages Message-ID: <1134296482.3128.12.camel@eagle.danny.cz> Hello, is there a way to install packages in an explicit order? In the TinyERP package I am creating its user and group in the %pre scripts, so I have fedora-usermgmt package in %Requires. In this situation the fedora-usermgmt package is installed in the group with tinyerp. But it can be (and on my clean system it was) after installing tinyerp, so the user and group are not created. I was using yum to do the installations. Dan From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 10:47:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 05:47:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512111047.jBBAlPjv017276@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-11 05:47 EST ------- - merged -uitext into main package and added the corresponding Provides: there - renamed -uigtk to -gtk - added 'smart-fedora-setup' and execute it in the %post section http://ensc.de/fedora/smart.spec http://ensc.de/fedora/smart-0.40-1.4.src.rpm ============ * ok, text interface is now provided by the main package (comment #1 + comment #2) * how can I build ksmarttray? afais, the tarballs lacks the needed 'configure' and 'Makefile.in' files. (comment #1) * at first glance 'smart-update' smells like a suid program whose functionality can be replaced by 'sudo' entirely. It seems to miss important features like propagating of $http_proxy environment variables, too. Because it is not build + installed by default I will not ship it. (comment #1) * I would like 'smartpm' as the packagename too and the spec file is prepared for the the 'smartpm' packagename But FE packaging guidelines require package-name == tarball-name. (comment #4) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ville.skytta at iki.fi Sun Dec 11 11:05:37 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 13:05:37 +0200 Subject: fixed order when installing packages In-Reply-To: <1134296482.3128.12.camel@eagle.danny.cz> References: <1134296482.3128.12.camel@eagle.danny.cz> Message-ID: <1134299137.2669.37.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 11:21 +0100, Dan Hor?k wrote: > is there a way to install packages in an explicit order? Yes, normally a plain Requires is enough, and there is also PreReq, and Requires(pre/post/preun/postun) for more specific scenarios. http://rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-depend-manual-dependencies.html#S3-RPM-DEPEND-FINE-GRAINED > In the TinyERP > package I am creating its user and group in the %pre scripts, so I have > fedora-usermgmt package in %Requires. In this situation the > fedora-usermgmt package is installed in the group with tinyerp. But it > can be (and on my clean system it was) after installing tinyerp, so the > user and group are not created. The tinyerp package is buggy, it has unneeded "Requires(pre): fedora-usermgmt" in the main package, but should have "Requires(pre): fedora-usermgmt" and "Requires(postun): fedora-usermgmt" in the -server subpackage. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 11:14:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 06:14:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512111114.jBBBEZZh018854@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-11 06:14 EST ------- Here's one specfile that builds ksmarttray: http://dag.wieers.com/packages/smart/smart.spec Dag's specfile could be worth looking into for other reasons too, for example the distro.py kernel handling stuff (which could/should be extended to other than UP and SMP kernels as well, eg. xen0, xenU, kdump, xen-hypervisor, xen-guest, maybe various kernel-devel packages and later Extras kernel module packages, and maybe RHEL-specific kernel variants), unless your package already takes care of it someway. Also, some channels would be nice to have out of the box. Maybe smart-fedora-setup already takes care of that; I haven't had a look yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 11:39:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 06:39:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512111139.jBBBdb30020682@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-11 06:39 EST ------- > I do not know what you mean with "local-address". Surely, "listen-address" :) The problem is we should not allow world-wide access to this port by default. > It is far easier to just mark ESP and UDP 500/4500 packets and only allow > marked packets to reach port 1701 (l2tp port). Not easy for "end-users". Also IMHO in general it is possible to use l2tp even without IPSec ... If after the default installation and "service l2tpd start" there are no any secure holes, all is OK. If not, the default config must be changed properly. > I am still using high releases because otherwise the rpms in this > correspondence would not be incremental in their release I can guess incrementation by the comment's number :) Paul, This package cannot be added to FE with the current version-release scheme, because of the appropriate Fedora versioning policy. I don't understand why you want to save the wrong (for the Fedora) versioning, even temporary... :( Also, please, either apply or answer something for comment #12 - comment #13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 11:47:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 06:47:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512111147.jBBBlc5d021477@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-11 06:47 EST ------- > according to >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines#head-975237cdcb9aa7775601adeaaccbc70290f69812 > version-release must be BTW if it is a cvs post-release (not pre-release), the version-release must be 0.69-15.20051030 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 12:11:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 07:11:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170504] Review Request: makebootfat - Utility for creation bootable FAT disk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512111211.jBBCBNhj023821@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makebootfat - Utility for creation bootable FAT disk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170504 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-11 07:11 EST ------- > There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. I'm not a x86 guru, but "file ldlinux.bss" say "x86 boot sector", "mbrfat.bin" has a source "mbrfat.asm" which has x86 commends... Are you sure these two files are architecture independent? Perhaps we even should specify ExclusiveArch tag... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From dan at danny.cz Sun Dec 11 12:29:15 2005 From: dan at danny.cz (Dan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hor=E1k?=) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 13:29:15 +0100 Subject: fixed order when installing packages In-Reply-To: <1134299137.2669.37.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> References: <1134296482.3128.12.camel@eagle.danny.cz> <1134299137.2669.37.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> Message-ID: <1134304155.3755.3.camel@eagle.danny.cz> > The tinyerp package is buggy, it has unneeded "Requires(pre): > fedora-usermgmt" in the main package, but should have "Requires(pre): > fedora-usermgmt" and "Requires(postun): fedora-usermgmt" in the -server > subpackage. > Thank you, I thought it should be easy to solve. Dan From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 13:25:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:25:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173040] Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512111325.jBBDPqaW028655@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173040 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-12-11 08:25 EST ------- When updating your .src.rpm, please always increment the Release number and add a changelog entry. I will test your RPM... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 13:27:06 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:27:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175473] New: Review Request: smart-channel -- Specifications for smart channels Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175473 Summary: Review Request: smart-channel -- Specifications for smart channels Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://ensc.de/fedora/smart-channels.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://ensc.de/fedora/smart-channels-0.2-0.src.rpm This package contains information about Fedora smart channels and related tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 13:27:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:27:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512111327.jBBDRSJ6028839@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175473 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 13:50:07 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 08:50:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512111350.jBBDo7s8030887@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-11 08:49 EST ------- ok, I added a -ksmarttray subpackage. I am not sure whether I should make it an own package ('-n ksmarttray'). smart-fedora-setup adds a special handling for default kernels but your additional variants are missing. Is it possible to enumerate all affected packages? Handling of the new, virtual 'kernel-module' provides will need upstream changes, too. I submitted a 'smart-channels' package (bug #175473) for review which contains definitions for Fedora channels. Although it has probably the same effect like a plain 'Requires:' (which would be wrong), I added a dependency on it with a 'Requires(missingok): smart-channels'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 17:06:54 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 12:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174915] Review Request: gnome-sudoku - A numerical logic puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512111706.jBBH6s2L013096@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sudoku - A numerical logic puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174915 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-11 12:06 EST ------- - rpmlint is satisfied - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC4 - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file installed - Works! :) A note about python's sitelib location: if you follow the python spec template there's a python_sitelib %define. Works without it though. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 18:23:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 13:23:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174915] Review Request: gnome-sudoku - A numerical logic puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512111823.jBBINd9V019965@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sudoku - A numerical logic puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174915 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-11 13:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > A note about python's sitelib location: if you follow the python spec template > there's a python_sitelib %define. Works without it though. I don't think it works. This is noarch python stuff, but the specfile uses %{_libdir}. That'll break when built on x86_64 (noarch python stuff lives nowadays always in /usr/lib, not /usr/lib64). I'd suggest using the python spec template. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 22:04:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:04:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174915] Review Request: gnome-sudoku - A numerical logic puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512112204.jBBM4TMn010148@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sudoku - A numerical logic puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174915 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-11 17:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > A note about python's sitelib location: if you follow the python spec template > > there's a python_sitelib %define. Works without it though. > > I don't think it works. This is noarch python stuff, but the specfile uses > %{_libdir}. That'll break when built on x86_64 (noarch python stuff lives > nowadays always in /usr/lib, not /usr/lib64). I'd suggest using the python spec > template. Oops, forgot about that. It works on i386, didn't test on others. Approval is now dependent on making this use python_sitelib instread of _libdir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 22:28:20 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:28:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175494] New: Review Request:
Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175494 Summary: Review Request:
Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: redhat at flyn.org QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/projects/new/new-1.3.5-1.src.rpm Description: A simple template system for creating text files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 22:28:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:28:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512112228.jBBMSbXR012944@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 redhat at flyn.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175494 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 22:37:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:37:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175495] New: Review Request: cgi-util Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175495 Summary: Review Request: cgi-util Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: redhat at flyn.org QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/cgi-util.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/cgi-util-2.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 22:37:43 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:37:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512112237.jBBMbhrx013952@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 redhat at flyn.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175495 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 22:38:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:38:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175496] New: Review Request:
Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175496 Summary: Review Request:
Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: redhat at flyn.org QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/projects/new/new-1.3.5-1.src.rpm Description: A simple template system for creating text files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 22:38:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:38:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512112238.jBBMcXFQ014076@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 redhat at flyn.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175496 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 22:52:47 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:52:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171334] Review Request: nsd - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512112252.jBBMqlKI015859@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nsd - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171334 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2005-12-11 17:52 EST ------- There were some minor changes I made to your spec: - used a %{?dist} tag (not mandatory, but good practice, IMHO) - corrected Source path (http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz) - moved rm -rf %{buildroot} from %prep to %install - owned %dir %{_sysconfdir}/nsd/ - %{_mandir}/*/* doesn't need to be %doc, anything in %{_mandir} is %doc automagically. I'm going to attach the revised spec, I did the review off that spec file. Also, note that 2.3.3 is out. You might want to update to that rev before committing. Good: - rpmlint checks return: E: nsd non-executable-script /etc/nsd/nsdc.conf 0644 E: nsd postin-without-chkconfig /etc/rc.d/init.d/nsd The nsdc.conf file has #!/bin/sh as its first line, but it's not a script (or rather, its a shell script that does nothing but define variables). Safe to ignore. The postin-without-chkconfig is also safe to ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (BSD-like) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED (assuming that you use my spec file changes). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 22:53:42 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:53:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175496] Review Request:
In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512112253.jBBMrgUH016038@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175496 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
|package name here> Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-11 17:53 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 175494 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 22:53:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:53:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175494] Review Request: new In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512112253.jBBMrnN3016080@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175494 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-11 17:53 EST ------- *** Bug 175496 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 23:22:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 18:22:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171336] Review Request: ldns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512112322.jBBNMFnK019347@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ldns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171336 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |tcallawa at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2005-12-11 18:21 EST ------- Again, I made some minor cleanups: - used %{?dist} (not mandatory) - moved rm -rf %{buildroot} from %prep to %install - # remove .la files rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/*.la - %{_mandir}/*/* doesn't need to be marked as %doc - nuked empty %pre - used %post -p /sbin/ldconfig - used %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig - no need for explicit "Requires: openssl", libcrypto.so.6 is detected as a dep - ldns is not LGPL, it is BSD Besides those minor items, it looked good. The library doesn't use versioned .so files correctly, so its alright to have the .so files in the main package instead of the usual split. I'm going to attach my cleaned-up spec, the review is based on my spec. Good: - rpmlint checks return: W: ldns devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libldns.so If libldns.so.1.0.0 existed, then I would want libldns.so in -devel, but since it doesn't... safe to ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (BSD) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r APPROVED (assuming that you use my spec file changes) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 23:47:56 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 18:47:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512112347.jBBNluHb022591@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 tcallawa at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175500 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 11 23:47:54 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 18:47:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175500] New: Review Request: compat-wxGTK2 & compat-wxPythonGTK2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175500 Summary: Review Request: compat-wxGTK2 & compat-wxPythonGTK2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/compat-wxPython.spec http://auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/compat-wxGTK.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/compat-wxGTK-2.4.2-14.src.rpm http://auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/compat-wxPythonGTK2-2.4.2.4-8.src.rpm Description: These are the compat packages for wx 2.4, based off the already approved packages in Fedora Extras. Infact, other than the name change, the only difference is that some binaries have been removed (because they conflict with the 2.6 binaries) and that wx-config is now wx-2.4-config. Applications needing to use the compat-wx* packages will need to be modified to call wx-2.4-config instead of wx-config. wxWidgets/GTK is the GTK+ (1.2) port of the C++ cross-platform wxWidgets GUI library, offering classes for all common GUI controls as well as a comprehensive set of helper classes for most common application tasks, ranging from networking to HTML display and image manipulation. wxPython is a GUI toolkit for the Python programming language. It allows Python programmers to create programs with a robust, highly functional graphical user interface, simply and easily. It is implemented as a Python extension module (native code) that wraps the popular wxWindows cross platform GUI library, which is written in C++. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 00:17:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:17:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175502] New: Review Request:
Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175502 Summary: Review Request:
Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.mindspring.com/~cweyl/perl-Gtk2-Spell/perl-Gtk2-Spell.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.mindspring.com/~cweyl/perl-Gtk2-Spell/perl-Gtk2-Spell-1.03-1.ckw.fc4.src.rpm Description: gtkspell bindings for perl(Gtk2) Perl bindings to GtkSpell, used in concert with Gtk2::TextView. Provides mis-spelled word highlighting in red and offers a right click pop-up menu with suggested corrections. Please ignore the ".ckw.fc4" in the srpm's filename -- I have %dist set to that in my ~/.rpmmacros. This is my first extras package, and I'm seeking a sponsor! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 00:17:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:17:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512120017.jBC0HfdO027077@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 cweyl at alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175502 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 00:30:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:30:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174915] Review Request: gnome-sudoku - A numerical logic puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512120030.jBC0Uccm028616@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sudoku - A numerical logic puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174915 ------- Additional Comments From stickster at gmail.com 2005-12-11 19:30 EST ------- Redone with fedora-rpmdevtools template, using %python_sitelib. Build still works fine and mock and rpmlint are both happy. Refer to the new spec and SRPM at: http://rpm.frields.org/extras-testing/gnome-sudoku/ Thanks Ville, now using the rpmdevtools from now on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 01:09:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 20:09:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172755] Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512120109.jBC19Sw9002067@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172755 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2005-12-11 20:09 EST ------- a working url. the link for your binary package doesent work (no big deal). ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/xcompmgr/ spec file looks good to me ;) works like a charm on x86_64 rawhide and nvidia card for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 02:02:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:02:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174915] Review Request: gnome-sudoku - A numerical logic puzzle game In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512120202.jBC22QdO009503@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-sudoku - A numerical logic puzzle game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174915 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-11 21:02 EST ------- My review in comment 1 still holds. APPROVED (again) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 03:41:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:41:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173722] Review Request: stratagus - Real-time strategy gaming engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512120341.jBC3fPjT017252@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stratagus - Real-time strategy gaming engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173722 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2005-12-11 22:41 EST ------- Any status on getting sponsored? You probably want the sponsor to take over the proper review. - Michel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 05:07:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174783] Review Request: gruler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512120507.jBC57C8i024831@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gruler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174783 ------- Additional Comments From mclasen at redhat.com 2005-12-12 00:06 EST ------- Updated spec: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gruler/gruler.spec Updated SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/gruler/gruler-0.6-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From roland at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 05:14:29 2005 From: roland at redhat.com (Roland McGrath) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:14:29 -0800 (PST) Subject: buildsystem not taking jobs? Message-ID: <20051212051429.A1EB0180813@magilla.sf.frob.com> I am getting this: Package monotone enqueued. (However, no Job ID was provided in the time required) plague-client list works, though it takes forever. I never see my job appear. I am using plague-client-0.4.3-2.fc4 (on FC4). From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 05:32:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:32:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170372] Review Request: moodle: A Course Management System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512120532.jBC5WfbJ026646@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moodle: A Course Management System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170372 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-12 00:32 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > E: moodle non-standard-uid /var/www/moodle/data apache > > E: moodle non-standard-gid /var/www/moodle/data apache > > Moodle needs to store data on the filesystem. > OK, ignoring. > > E: moodle non-executable-script /var/www/moodle/web/admin/process_email.php 0644 > > Just a file with a shebang line, no biggie. > > > E: moodle non-executable-script /var/www/moodle/web/mod/chat/chatd.php 0644 > > Interesting, a chat daemon written in PHP. I'm not sure how changing this will > impact Moodle, although I feel it can be done easily enough once the package has > been imported. > OK, ignoring, as long as it works without execute bit. > > E: moodle non-executable-script > /var/www/moodle/web/mod/wiki/ewiki/fragments/mkhuge 0644 > > I could easily enough remove this, I suppose. Your call. > Keep. It's of limited use, but no harm done in keeping it. > > E: moodle htaccess-file /var/www/moodle/web/auth/shibboleth/.htaccess > > Needed for shibboleth auth, AFAICT. OK. > > > W: moodle non-conffile-in-etc /etc/cron.d/moodle > > > None of the localization pacakges have docs, and a few have zero length php file. > > There are no non-English docs AFAICS. And I'm relutant to remove the zero-length > files as I don't know how it will affect Moodle. OK. Ignoring all those and rpmlint doesn't like the 0755 perms on moodle init scripe but matches those on my system. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc - spec file legible - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC4 i386 - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales handled with the sub packages - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - works, imported sucessfully into mysql APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 05:36:42 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:36:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174783] Review Request: gruler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512120536.jBC5ag2Y027114@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gruler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174783 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-12 00:36 EST ------- Something went wrong with your *-3.src.rpm # rpm -qlvp gruler-0.6-3.src.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 mclasen mclasen 0 Dec 12 06:05 gruler-0.6-cflags.patch Note the size of the patch (0) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 06:00:11 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:00:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512120600.jBC60BIV029791@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From michel.salim at gmail.com 2005-12-12 00:59 EST ------- - gnu-smalltalk-devel should depends on %{name}-%{version} not just %{name} - I'm not sure why the *.a, *.la, sigsegv.h files are removed. Should they not be put in -devel? - Likewise, the libgst.so is OK in -devel, but libgst.so.* should be in the main gnu-smalltalk package. Almost ready to go otherwise. Gerard, anything I missed? - Michel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 08:24:01 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:24:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174504] Review Request: wine-docs - Documentation for wine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512120824.jBC8O1Wd010075@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine-docs - Documentation for wine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174504 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-12 03:23 EST ------- New version: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine-docs.spec http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine-docs-0.9.3-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 08:26:13 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 03:26:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171526] Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512120826.jBC8QDDk010234@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171526 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-12 03:25 EST ------- New version: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine.spec http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine-0.9.3-1.src.rpm http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine-fc5.spec http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine-0.9.3-1.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ville.skytta at iki.fi Mon Dec 12 10:08:53 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:08:53 +0200 Subject: buildsystem not taking jobs? In-Reply-To: <20051212051429.A1EB0180813@magilla.sf.frob.com> References: <20051212051429.A1EB0180813@magilla.sf.frob.com> Message-ID: <1134382133.14948.5.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 21:14 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > I am getting this: > > Package monotone enqueued. (However, no Job ID was provided in the time required) This seems stuck: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=1665 $ plague-client kill 1665 Success: job 1665 killed. $ plague-client requeue 1665 Error: Job 1665 must be either 'failed' or 'killed' to requeue. $ plague-client list uid 1665 1665: libapreq2 (libapreq2-2_07-0_2_rc3_fc5) ville.skytta at iki.fi waiting/in-progress $ plague-client kill 1665 Job 1665 is already finished. $ plague-client requeue 1665 Error: Job 1665 must be either 'failed' or 'killed' to requeue. Duh. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 11:36:05 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 06:36:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK2 & compat-wxPythonGTK2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121136.jBCBa5DG030177@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-wxGTK2 & compat-wxPythonGTK2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175500 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matthias at rpmforge.net ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2005-12-12 06:35 EST ------- These look pretty good (apart from the added tabs, when the spec files used spaces ;-)). Have you tried to modify and build some applications using them? (just to know if it'll be easy or not), like audacity for instance? If no one else steps up, I wouldn't mind reviewing the packages, but I'll need to do some further testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From dcbw at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 13:04:43 2005 From: dcbw at redhat.com (Dan Williams) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 08:04:43 -0500 Subject: buildsystem not taking jobs? In-Reply-To: <20051212051429.A1EB0180813@magilla.sf.frob.com> References: <20051212051429.A1EB0180813@magilla.sf.frob.com> Message-ID: <1134392683.16482.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 21:14 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > I am getting this: > > Package monotone enqueued. (However, no Job ID was provided in the time required) > > plague-client list works, though it takes forever. > I never see my job appear. > > I am using plague-client-0.4.3-2.fc4 (on FC4). Kicked. Dan From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 13:11:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 08:11:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175329] Review Request: sobby - standalone obby server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121311.jBCDBZZH010370@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sobby - standalone obby server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175329 adrian at lisas.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |adrian at lisas.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From adrian at lisas.de 2005-12-12 08:11 EST ------- * rpmlint is happy * builds in mock (FC-4 and rawhide) * clean installation and removal * spec looks good * source matches upstream APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 13:26:44 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 08:26:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171526] Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121326.jBCDQiOF012011@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171526 ------- Additional Comments From adrian at lisas.de 2005-12-12 08:26 EST ------- build fails in "mock -r fedora-development-i386-core": gcc -o wine-preloader -static -nostartfiles -nodefaultlibs -Wl,-Ttext=0x7c000000 preloader.o -L../libs/port -lwin e_port preloader.o: In function `wld_printf': /builddir/build/BUILD/wine-0.9.3/loader/preloader.c:360: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail' preloader.o: In function `map_so_lib': /builddir/build/BUILD/wine-0.9.3/loader/preloader.c:734: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [wine-preloader] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/wine-0.9.3/loader' make: *** [loader] Error 2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Mon Dec 12 14:03:56 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:03:56 +0100 Subject: buildsystem not taking jobs? In-Reply-To: <1134392683.16482.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20051212051429.A1EB0180813@magilla.sf.frob.com> <1134392683.16482.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1134396236.28658.19.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 08:04 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 21:14 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > > I am getting this: > > > > Package monotone enqueued. (However, no Job ID was provided in the time required) > > > > plague-client list works, though it takes forever. > > I never see my job appear. > > > > I am using plague-client-0.4.3-2.fc4 (on FC4). Any chances to see this fixed? x86_64: Error: Missing Dependency: libdl.so.2 is needed by package libsetrans Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by package libsetrans Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by package libsetrans Despite people seem to be mass-rebuilding packages for rawhide, and despite I can't spot anything like these broken deps above in today's rawhide's "Broken deps" reports, the build system refuses to build any of my packages since at least Thursday aborting with the error messages above. Ralf From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Mon Dec 12 14:44:25 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:44:25 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051212144425.2FFDF8001@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 4 cernlib-2005-8.fc3.4 gtkmathview-0.7.6-1.fc3 perl-Data-Buffer-0.04-1.fc3 tinyerp-3.1.1-4.fc3 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Mon Dec 12 14:49:05 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:49:05 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051212144905.B46CD8001@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 4 gtkmathview-0.7.6-1.fc4 perl-Data-Buffer-0.04-1.fc4 perl-PatchReader-0.9.5-3.fc4 tinyerp-3.1.1-4.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Mon Dec 12 15:12:44 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:12:44 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051212151244.E93B18001@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 1 perl-PatchReader-0.9.5-3.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From dcbw at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 15:13:23 2005 From: dcbw at redhat.com (Dan Williams) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:13:23 -0500 Subject: buildsystem not taking jobs? In-Reply-To: <1134396236.28658.19.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <20051212051429.A1EB0180813@magilla.sf.frob.com> <1134392683.16482.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1134396236.28658.19.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <1134400403.2735.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 15:03 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 08:04 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 21:14 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > I am getting this: > > > > > > Package monotone enqueued. (However, no Job ID was provided in the time required) > > > > > > plague-client list works, though it takes forever. > > > I never see my job appear. > > > > > > I am using plague-client-0.4.3-2.fc4 (on FC4). > > Any chances to see this fixed? > > x86_64: > > Error: Missing Dependency: libdl.so.2 is needed by package libsetrans > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by package > libsetrans > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by package > libsetrans An investigation yields: dist/fc5/libsetrans/0.1.11-2/x86_64> rpm -qp --requires libsetrans-0.1.11-2.x86_64.rpm /sbin/ldconfig libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdl.so.2 libselinux.so.1 So the x86_64 libsetrans appears to be linked against an i686 glibc [1]. Which obviously won't always be provided on an x86_64 system. So it appears that, as I said, it's rawhide issues not specific to the build system. Dan [1] Note that libsetrans-0.1.9-1.x86_64.rpm _does_ have the correct (64bit) RPM requires. 0.1.11-1 and 0.1.11-2 do not. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 15:12:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:12:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166549] Review Request: synce-gnomevfs - Gnome-vfs module for synce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121512.jBCFCkf3028239@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-gnomevfs - Gnome-vfs module for synce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166549 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: synce- |Review Request: synce- |gnomevfs - Gnome-vfs module |gnomevfs - Gnome-vfs module |for synce |for synce Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-12 10:12 EST ------- Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Source synce-gnomevfs-0.9.0.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of synce-gnomevfs looks OK * File list of synce-gnomevfs looks OK * Works fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 15:31:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:31:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175329] Review Request: sobby - standalone obby server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121531.jBCFVXgb030568@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sobby - standalone obby server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175329 lmacken at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From lmacken at redhat.com 2005-12-12 10:31 EST ------- Imported. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 15:35:44 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:35:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166551] Review Request: synce-trayicon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121535.jBCFZioI031262@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-trayicon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166551 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-12 10:35 EST ------- Needs work: * Missing BR: libgnomeui-devel, libgtop2-devel * The package should contain a .desktop file (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop) Minor: * Duplicate BuildRequires: zlib-devel (by libxml2-devel), atk-devel (by gtk2-devel), pango-devel (by gtk2-devel), libbonobo-devel (by libgnome-devel), ORBit2-devel (by libgnome-devel), libxml2-devel (by libgnome-devel), gtk2-devel (by libglade2-devel), libglade2-devel (by libgnomeui-devel), libgnome-devel (by libgnomeui-devel), libart_lgpl-devel (by libgnomeui-devel) You may clean that up if you want, but it's really minor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Mon Dec 12 15:46:08 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:46:08 +0100 Subject: buildsystem not taking jobs? In-Reply-To: <1134400403.2735.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20051212051429.A1EB0180813@magilla.sf.frob.com> <1134392683.16482.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1134396236.28658.19.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1134400403.2735.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1134402368.28658.43.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 10:13 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 15:03 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 08:04 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > > On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 21:14 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > > Any chances to see this fixed? > > > > x86_64: > > > > Error: Missing Dependency: libdl.so.2 is needed by package libsetrans > > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by package > > libsetrans > > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by package > > libsetrans > > An investigation yields: > > dist/fc5/libsetrans/0.1.11-2/x86_64> rpm -qp --requires libsetrans-0.1.11-2.x86_64.rpm > /sbin/ldconfig > libc.so.6 > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) > libdl.so.2 > libselinux.so.1 > > So the x86_64 libsetrans appears to be linked against an i686 glibc [1]. > Which obviously won't always be provided on an x86_64 system. So it > appears that, as I said, it's rawhide issues not specific to the build > system. Hmm, so rawhide is silently broken because of a mis-compiled package, and your rawhide "dependency checker" fails to detect it? That's at least how I read the last couple (all since Thursday( of "rawhide reports", such as today's (https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2005-December/msg00317.html) which don't contain any indication on such kind of problem. Ralf From dcbw at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 16:02:54 2005 From: dcbw at redhat.com (Dan Williams) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:02:54 -0500 Subject: buildsystem not taking jobs? In-Reply-To: <1134402368.28658.43.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <20051212051429.A1EB0180813@magilla.sf.frob.com> <1134392683.16482.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1134396236.28658.19.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1134400403.2735.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1134402368.28658.43.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <1134403374.2735.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 16:46 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 10:13 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 15:03 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 08:04 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 21:14 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > > Any chances to see this fixed? > > > > > > x86_64: > > > > > > Error: Missing Dependency: libdl.so.2 is needed by package libsetrans > > > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by package > > > libsetrans > > > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by package > > > libsetrans > > > > An investigation yields: > > > > dist/fc5/libsetrans/0.1.11-2/x86_64> rpm -qp --requires libsetrans-0.1.11-2.x86_64.rpm > > /sbin/ldconfig > > libc.so.6 > > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) > > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) > > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) > > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) > > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) > > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) > > libdl.so.2 > > libselinux.so.1 > > > > So the x86_64 libsetrans appears to be linked against an i686 glibc [1]. > > Which obviously won't always be provided on an x86_64 system. So it > > appears that, as I said, it's rawhide issues not specific to the build > > system. > > Hmm, so rawhide is silently broken because of a mis-compiled package, > and your rawhide "dependency checker" fails to detect it? To be fair, it did get detected on ppc64 and ia64 in the report. However, i386 glibc is included in the dependency graph for x86_64 for various reasons (lots of stuff on x86_64 is still 32-bit in Fedora), so this wouldn't have shown up because 32-bit glibc was in the graph. That said, the tools do have room for improvement. Dan From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 16:01:43 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:01:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121601.jBCG1hBG003181@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2005-12-12 11:01 EST ------- On http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#head-e3f33b737a91aa22385d1cb155bb8d611558ae22 you can read, that *.a and *.la should be not included in any package. AFAIK sigsegv is provided by glibc-devel. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 16:16:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:16:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174486] Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121616.jBCGG2Ob004963@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-12 11:15 EST ------- Possible improvement : instead of using two sources for ld.so.conf.d, why no just create them in the spec file ? Ex: cat > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/ld.so.conf.d/opensync.conf << EOF %{_libdir}/opensync/ %{_libdir}/opensync/formats/ %{_libdir}/opensync/plugins/ EOF -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 16:44:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:44:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174486] Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121644.jBCGikfY010040@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-12 11:44 EST ------- I don't know about this. I tought that these kind of things should not be done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 16:59:19 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:59:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166550] Review Request: synce-software-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121659.jBCGxJ2N011820@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-software-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166550 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-12 11:59 EST ------- Review for release 3: * RPM name is OK * Source synce-software-manager-0.9.0.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of synce-software-manager looks OK * File list of synce-software-manager looks OK * Works fine I would APPROVE this version, I'm changing the blocker bug. Jef, if you disagree, feel free to set it back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From orion at cora.nwra.com Mon Dec 12 17:05:44 2005 From: orion at cora.nwra.com (Orion Poplawski) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:05:44 -0700 Subject: CVSROOT syncmail and tag-check errors In-Reply-To: <1134117505.12691.16.camel@laurel.intra.city-fan.org> References: <200512082135.jB8LZxql022511@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <1134117505.12691.16.camel@laurel.intra.city-fan.org> Message-ID: <439DADE8.4060200@cora.nwra.com> Paul Howarth wrote: > Seems to still need fixing: > > $ cvs commit perl-Crypt-DH.spec > For more information on using the Fedora CVS repositories, please visit > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs > Enter passphrase for key '/home/paul/.ssh/id_dsa': > **** Access allowed: pghmcfc is in ACL for rpms/perl-Crypt-DH/devel. > Checking in perl-Crypt-DH.spec; > /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Crypt-DH/devel/perl-Crypt-DH.spec,v <-- > perl-Crypt-DH.spec > new revision: 1.2; previous revision: 1.1 > done > Running syncmail... > Mailing cvsextras at fedora.redhat.com... > ...syncmail done. > cvs diff: [08:32:28] waiting for pghmcfc's lock > in /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Crypt-DH/devel > Running syncmail... > Mailing relnotes at fedoraproject.org... > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/cvs/extras/CVSROOT/syncmail", line 314, in ? > main() > File "/cvs/extras/CVSROOT/syncmail", line 308, in main > blast_mail(subject, people) > File "/cvs/extras/CVSROOT/syncmail", line 207, in blast_mail > if I not in commit_message: > TypeError: 'in ' requires character as left operand > cvs diff: [08:32:58] obtained lock > in /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Crypt-DH/devel > $ > Still seeing this, and now getting: $ make tag cvs tag -c kdesvn-0_7_1-1_fc5 For more information on using the Fedora CVS repositories, please visit http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UsingCvs ? kdesvn-0.7.0-0.rc1.fc5.src.rpm ? kdesvn-0.7.0rc1 ? kdesvn-0.7.0rc1.tar.gz ? kdesvn-0.7.1-1.fc5.src.rpm cvs tag: cannot find pre-tag filter '/cvs/extras/CVSROOT/tag-check': No such file or directory cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! make: *** [tag] Error 1 as well. -- Orion Poplawski System Administrator 303-415-9701 x222 Colorado Research Associates/NWRA FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane, Boulder CO 80301 http://www.co-ra.com From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 17:03:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:03:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166551] Review Request: synce-trayicon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121703.jBCH3VE2012361@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-trayicon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166551 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-12 12:03 EST ------- Here is a tuned version: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/synce-trayicon-0.9.0-2.src.rpm http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/synce-trayicon.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 17:15:53 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:15:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174490] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-evolution2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121715.jBCHFrOX013716@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-evolution2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174490 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-12 12:15 EST ------- Missing BR: evolution-data-server-devel While you're at it, rpmlint complains that the line "The libopensync-plugin-evolution2-devel package contains the files needed for development" is too long. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 17:27:32 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:27:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166551] Review Request: synce-trayicon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121727.jBCHRWhE015308@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-trayicon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166551 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-12 12:27 EST ------- The package still needs a desktop file. Why did you switch from make install DESTDIR= to %makeinstall ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 17:30:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:30:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174486] Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121730.jBCHUbdt015675@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-12 12:30 EST ------- Really ? I'd say that it's ok for small files (I would put a desktop file in an extra source for example), and here it benefits a lot from the macro expansion. Any reason why it should not be done ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 17:44:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:44:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121744.jBCHin0J017612@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 ------- Additional Comments From dmaley at redhat.com 2005-12-12 12:44 EST ------- OK thanks, I'll remove the pango-devel and glib2-devel BR and will also add a %{?dist} tag since I'd love to get this included for all maintained releases. I'll likely go ahead and inplement the other suggestions you've made here so that wavbreaker stays consistent w/ the other packages in Fedora. However I'll have to look into having it default to ALSA rather than OSS. The ALSA support was recently added so I want to be sure it doesn't introduce too many problems. Denis - On my home system, which has an RME Digi96/8 PST soundcard, I had to change the soundcrad configuration for ALSA to be "hw:0,0" however on all other systems I've tested with the default of "plughw:0,0" has worked just fine. And I'll see what I can do to track down a sponsor ... Thanks to all who have responded here w/ comments and/or suggestions! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 18:31:48 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:31:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121831.jBCIVmS3022869@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2005-12-12 13:31 EST ------- *.la files shouldn't be included if possible, however I disagree with the packaging guidelines about the *.a. It is useful for developers to be able to link against certain static libraries, so they can distribute their programs without the libraries. Sometimes however libraries require more than just the library code itself. Then this is not possible. In the case of gnu smalltalk I am not sure if it useful to include *.a or not, you may do as you want. "sigsegv.h" is part of libsigsegv-devel. This library is included with gst and linked-in. The header file is not used, so it can be left out. I agree with the rest of Michel's comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 18:41:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:41:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175551] New: Review Request: asa - Convert Fortran carriage control characters Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175551 Summary: Review Request: asa - Convert Fortran carriage control characters Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: pertusus at free.fr QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com SRPM Name or Url: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/docs/fc-srpms/asa-1.2-1.src.rpm Description: A POSIX.2 compliant asa(1), for converting Fortran carriage control characters to line printer control characters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 18:41:53 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:41:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121841.jBCIfrXK024357@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From dcbw at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 18:47:07 2005 From: dcbw at redhat.com (Dan Williams) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:47:07 -0500 Subject: buildsystem not taking jobs? In-Reply-To: <1134396236.28658.19.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <20051212051429.A1EB0180813@magilla.sf.frob.com> <1134392683.16482.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1134396236.28658.19.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <1134413227.8216.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 15:03 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 08:04 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 21:14 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > I am getting this: > > > > > > Package monotone enqueued. (However, no Job ID was provided in the time required) > > > > > > plague-client list works, though it takes forever. > > > I never see my job appear. > > > > > > I am using plague-client-0.4.3-2.fc4 (on FC4). > > Any chances to see this fixed? > > x86_64: > > Error: Missing Dependency: libdl.so.2 is needed by package libsetrans > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by package > libsetrans > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by package > libsetrans > > Despite people seem to be mass-rebuilding packages for rawhide, and > despite I can't spot anything like these broken deps above in today's > rawhide's "Broken deps" reports, the build system refuses to build any > of my packages since at least Thursday aborting with the error messages > above. Jeremy rebuilt libsetrans today with a fix, so it should be out tomorrow in Rawhide. Please let the list know if there are still issues on x86_64 after libsetrans-0.1.11-3 comes out. Thanks, Dan From sopwith at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 19:01:33 2005 From: sopwith at redhat.com (Elliot Lee) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 14:01:33 -0500 (EST) Subject: CVS Message-ID: You should be able to commit to Extras CVS again - sorry for the problems. Best, -- Elliot Unanswered questions in The Matrix: What happens if you take both the red pill AND the blue pill? From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 19:10:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 14:10:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121910.jBCJAnu7028902@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-12 14:10 EST ------- All other packagers I'm aware of ship ksmarttray as "ksmarttray", not "smart-ksmarttray", I'd suggest following that. It just looks and feels better that way IMO (bundling in the tarball aside, kyum vs yum-kyum, yumex vs yum-yumex, synaptic vs apt-synaptic etc). I don't know of a way to enumerate kernel variants but I don't think listing a bunch of known ones would be much of a maintenance burden. It wouldn't work for custom kernels though. If it helps, kernel module packages can also be recognized by a name prefix or something in the future once the proposal is finalized. What rpm versions does Requires(missingok) work with? (At least so that the specfile parser groks it.) Specifying "tui" or "gtk" as the version to ui(%name) sounds strange, and now that the text UI is bundled in the main package, ui(%name) doesn't seem to serve a purpose any more. desktop-file-install warns: /home/scop/rpmbuild/SOURCES/smart.desktop: missing encoding (guessed UTF-8) ksmarttray build fails on FC5t1+rawhide, configure tries to use -lXt but it isn't found. BuildRequires: libXt-devel fixes it. How is ksmarttray supposed to be found by end users? Some kind of menu entry (an usual one, or one that is listed in KDE's "add applet" choices) should be included. I don't think sudo is the correct tool to handle updating with ksmarttray, something with the ability to prompt for the root password in a GUI would sound better (eg. consolehelper and friends). IMO smart-gtk should be changed to use consolehelper too. If you want to have a Provides: smartpm, adding Provides: smartpm-gtk to the gtk subpackage too wouldn't hurt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 19:24:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 14:24:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173053] Review Request: perl-Readonly-XS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121924.jBCJOROd030666@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly-XS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173053 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-12 14:24 EST ------- fc5 build system still not working (for any binary package) - package succesfully through system on FC-4/FC-3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 19:59:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 14:59:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512121959.jBCJxZsK003475@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From kevin.kofler at chello.at 2005-12-12 14:59 EST ------- > eg. consolehelper and friends Or kdesu, given that it's a KDE package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ville.skytta at iki.fi Mon Dec 12 20:07:00 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 22:07:00 +0200 Subject: Orphaning bunch of packages (thinkpad, smart card, perl related) Message-ID: <1134418020.14948.38.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> After a few weeks or so, I won't have a ThinkPad any more, so in addition to the already orphaned kernel-module-thinkpad, tpctl and configure-thinkpad, xosd and tpb are looking for a new maintainer (already added to the orphaned packages page in Wiki). Other packages that I currently maintain that are up for grabs and will probably become "potentially unmaintained" (meaning I may keep an eye on them, but not as actively as currently) in the near future include smart card related stuff (pcsc-lite, pcsc-perl, openct, opensc, ccid) as well as the majority of my CPAN perl packages. Ping me or reply to list if you want a more info or if you'd like to take over maintainership of some of these. From ville.skytta at iki.fi Mon Dec 12 20:13:50 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 22:13:50 +0200 Subject: inkscape maintained? Message-ID: <1134418430.14948.45.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> Inkscape in FE is currently AFAIK affected by an arbitrary code execution vulnerability, #173993 was posted about three weeks ago and it seems that a simple version upgrade would fix it. But there's no response to the bugzilla ticket; is the package still maintained? (No, sorry, I'm not volunteering ;)) From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 20:45:57 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:45:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174492] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512122045.jBCKjvvU008688@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174492 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-12 15:45 EST ------- When building in mock, at the end of the ./configure call there is: FAM not available. No sync alerts are supported. To enable sync alerts you must have libfam-dev installed. Maybe adding gamin-devel in the BRs could be useful -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From denis at poolshark.org Mon Dec 12 21:02:06 2005 From: denis at poolshark.org (Denis Leroy) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:02:06 -0800 Subject: inkscape maintained? In-Reply-To: <1134418430.14948.45.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> References: <1134418430.14948.45.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> Message-ID: <439DE54E.4030502@poolshark.org> Ville Skytt? wrote: > Inkscape in FE is currently AFAIK affected by an arbitrary code > execution vulnerability, #173993 was posted about three weeks ago and it > seems that a simple version upgrade would fix it. But there's no > response to the bugzilla ticket; is the package still maintained? > (No, sorry, I'm not volunteering ;)) I'll volunteer. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 21:17:53 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:17:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175566] New: Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175566 Summary: Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: ch.nolte at fh-wolfenbuettel.de QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://public.fh-wolfenbuettel.de/~noltec/open-source/kbibtex/kbibtex.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://public.fh-wolfenbuettel.de/~noltec/open-source/kbibtex/kbibtex-0.1.3-1.src.rpm Description: I have made an RPM for kbibtex to be reviewed. KBibTeX is a KDE BiBTeX Editor written by Thomas Fischer. See http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~fischer/kbibtex This is my first contribution so I need a sponsor please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 21:18:05 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:18:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512122118.jBCLI5XG012549@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 ch.nolte at fh-wolfenbuettel.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175566 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 21:35:07 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:35:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174495] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-kdepim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512122135.jBCLZ7vB014760@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-kdepim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174495 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-12 16:34 EST ------- In my opinion, the foo-bar name means that bar enhances foo. In this case, the kdepim plugin enhances opensync more than enhances kdepim, so I's stick with the original name. (on the contrary, I didn't find any packaging errors with this plugin, but at the end of the synchronization, it pops up a kcrash dialog. I've tried adding back the *.la files and rebuilding it on my system (not in mock), but it still crashes. Any idea ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 21:39:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:39:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174495] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-kdepim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512122139.jBCLdZXJ015584@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-kdepim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174495 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-12 16:39 EST ------- Missing end of sentence: ...(on the contrary, for the xmms-arts plugin for example, xmms is enhanced by the plugin, not arts.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 22:11:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:11:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174497] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-phyton In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512122211.jBCMBfJN023284@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-phyton https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174497 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-12 17:11 EST ------- Missing BR: python-devel Also, shouldn't the package own the /usr/lib/opensync/python-plugins/ directory ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de Mon Dec 12 22:57:58 2005 From: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de (Andreas Bierfert) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 23:57:58 +0100 Subject: Orphaning bunch of packages (thinkpad, smart card, perl related) In-Reply-To: <1134418020.14948.38.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> References: <1134418020.14948.38.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> Message-ID: <439E0076.6070809@lowlatency.de> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ville Skytt? wrote: > configure-thinkpad, xosd and tpb are looking for a new maintainer someone xosd? ;) Otherwise I would like to step in. - - Andreas - -- Andreas Bierfert | http://awbsworld.de | GPG: C58CF1CB andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de | http://lowlatency.de | signed/encrypted phone: +49 2402 102373 | cell: +49 172 9789968 | mail preferred -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDngB2QEQyPsWM8csRAiPlAKCtV/hYUm8cZgnYqiLxy9YRiF6Z9wCeJuy1 Fl2pxQ5pGBmhQqec0enckMQ= =KjPG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 12 23:07:01 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 18:07:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174496] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-palm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512122307.jBCN71Nm031195@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-palm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174496 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-12 18:06 EST ------- Review for release 1: * RPM name is OK * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of libopensync-plugin-palm looks OK * File list of libopensync-plugin-palm looks OK * File list of libopensync-plugin-palm-devel looks OK * Works fine APPROVED To improve: * rpmlint complains on libopensync-plugin-palm-devel: the line "The libopensync-plugin-palm-devel package contains the files needed for development" is too long. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 00:18:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:18:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165955] Review Request: grads Grid Analysis and Display System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130018.jBD0IQJP009503@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grads Grid Analysis and Display System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165955 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2005-12-12 19:18 EST ------- Here is a new try: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/grads-1.9b4-3.src.rpm In that build, I have removed the files with GPL incompatible licences. I also have applied the patch for a newer libnc-dap. I have bundled the list of the files from src directory that have an incompatible licence (in the file grads-removed-files-list), and added a shell script, grads-remove-files, that removes the files. So to to regenerate the sources, one could do something like: spectool grads.spec sh grads-remove-files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 01:06:43 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:06:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171334] Review Request: nsd - In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130106.jBD16hF6015057@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nsd - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171334 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2005-12-12 20:06 EST ------- I have incorporated your spec file changes. nsd-2.3.2 and 2.3.3 fail to start properly when compiled with --enable-checking I have a patch from the developers, but that still did not fix the issue. I left their patch in but left out --enable-checking for now. In that configuration, the nsd rpm is stable (and we're running it on our primary nameserver) I've updated the rpm and spec file, and will commmit to FE when the access has been created. ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/nsd/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/nsd.spec ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/nsd/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/nsd-2.3.3-2.src.rpm Thanks! Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 01:37:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:37:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171336] Review Request: ldns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130137.jBD1bduo019369@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ldns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171336 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2005-12-12 20:37 EST ------- Thanks, incorporated and made new srpm and spec file: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/ldns/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/ldns.spec ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/ldns/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/ldns-1.0.0-5.src.rpm No changes from my end. So I will put this in FE once I gained access. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 02:00:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:00:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171336] Review Request: ldns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130200.jBD2006P023155@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ldns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171336 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2005-12-12 20:59 EST ------- Paul, you should already have access. This package (and nsd) are approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 03:15:06 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 22:15:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170616] Review Request: ipxripd - IPX RIP/SAP daemon - routing for IPX networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130315.jBD3F6Mh031143@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipxripd - IPX RIP/SAP daemon - routing for IPX networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170616 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-12 22:14 EST ------- - rpmlint only says: W: ipxripd incoherent-init-script-name ipxd Looks like an OK name for the script though. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC4 i386 - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - init script However, %defattr(-,root,root) should be %defattr(-,root,root,-) (I had to modprobe ipx before ipxd would stay running and not immediately exit.) Make the %defattr change and this is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From wtogami at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 04:19:26 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 23:19:26 -0500 Subject: rpms/sobby/devel sobby.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 In-Reply-To: <200512121521.jBCFLPBk000937@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> References: <200512121521.jBCFLPBk000937@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Message-ID: <439E4BCE.1030405@redhat.com> Please forgive me if I missed something obvious, but where is the review ticket and approval for this package? Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com Luke Macken (lmacken) wrote: > Author: lmacken > > Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/sobby/devel > In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv864/devel > > Modified Files: > .cvsignore sources > Added Files: > sobby.spec > Log Message: > auto-import sobby-0.3.0-1.rc3 on branch devel from sobby-0.3.0-1.rc3.src.rpm > > > --- NEW FILE sobby.spec --- > %define _rc rc3 > > Name: sobby > Version: 0.3.0 > Release: 1.%{_rc}%{?dist} > Summary: Standalone obby server > > Group: Applications/Internet > License: GPL > URL: http://gobby.0x539.de > Source0: http://releases.0x539.de/sobby/%{name}-%{version}%{_rc}.tar.gz > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > > BuildRequires: obby-devel, glibmm24-devel > > %description > Sobby is a standalone obby server. > > > %prep > %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}%{_rc} > > > %build > %configure > make %{?_smp_mflags} > > > %install > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT > > > %clean > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > > > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc README NEWS AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog > %{_bindir}/sobby > > > %changelog > * Wed Dec 07 2005 Luke Macken - 0.3.0-1.rc3 > - Packaged for Fedora Extras > > > Index: .cvsignore > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sobby/devel/.cvsignore,v > retrieving revision 1.1 > retrieving revision 1.2 > diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 > --- .cvsignore 12 Dec 2005 15:19:53 -0000 1.1 > +++ .cvsignore 12 Dec 2005 15:20:52 -0000 1.2 > @@ -0,0 +1 @@ > +sobby-0.3.0rc3.tar.gz > > > Index: sources > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/sobby/devel/sources,v > retrieving revision 1.1 > retrieving revision 1.2 > diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 > --- sources 12 Dec 2005 15:19:53 -0000 1.1 > +++ sources 12 Dec 2005 15:20:52 -0000 1.2 > @@ -0,0 +1 @@ > +8c3538992f83527cfb9f0a42a9e2ed87 sobby-0.3.0rc3.tar.gz > From paul at cypherpunks.ca Tue Dec 13 04:27:59 2005 From: paul at cypherpunks.ca (Paul Wouters) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 05:27:59 +0100 (CET) Subject: rpms/sobby/devel sobby.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 In-Reply-To: <439E4BCE.1030405@redhat.com> References: <200512121521.jBCFLPBk000937@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <439E4BCE.1030405@redhat.com> Message-ID: On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Warren Togami wrote: > Please forgive me if I missed something obvious, but where is the review > ticket and approval for this package? Message-Id: <200512121311.jBCDBZZH010370 at www.beta.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 08:11:35 -0500 From: bugzilla at redhat.com To: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Subject: [Bug 175329] Review Request: sobby - standalone obby server Paul From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 04:24:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 23:24:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175144] Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130424.jBD4ONXW009561@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175144 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2005-12-12 23:24 EST ------- I looked at packaging Net::SNMP, but it requires perl-Crypt-DES, which has a BSD with advertising License, so not sure it would be acceptable. I have also asked upstream about supporting net-snmp-perl (which is already in core) instead of Net::SNMP. In the mean time I have made a new version that removes the DBD::Sybase and Net:SNMP requirements. They can be added back in later when upstream supports net-snmp-perl or perl-Net-SNMP is added to extras. new SPEC: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/munin/munin.spec new src.rpm: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/munin/munin-1.2.4-2.fc5.src.rpm diff of spec from last version: 3c3 < Release: 1%{?dist} --- > Release: 2%{?dist} 88c88 < install-main install-node install-node-plugins install-doc install-man --- > install-main install-node-non-snmp install-node-plugins install-doc install-man 107a108,115 > # > # remove the Net::SNMP and Sybase plugins for now, as they need perl modules > # that are not in extras. We can readd them when/if those modules are added. > # > rm -f %{buildroot}/usr/share/munin/plugins/pm3users_ > rm -f %{buildroot}/usr/share/munin/plugins/snmp_* > rm -f %{buildroot}/usr/share/munin/plugins/sybase_space > 202d209 < %{_sbindir}/munin-node-configure-snmp 217a225,227 > * Mon Dec 12 2005 Kevin Fenzi - 1.2.4-2 > - Removed plugins that require Net-SNMP and Sybase > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From kevin-fedora-extras at scrye.com Tue Dec 13 04:32:13 2005 From: kevin-fedora-extras at scrye.com (Kevin Fenzi) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:32:13 -0700 Subject: Orphaning bunch of packages (thinkpad, smart card, perl related) References: <1134418020.14948.38.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> Message-ID: <20051213043216.3B67145437A@ningauble.scrye.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>>>> "Ville" == Ville Skytt writes: Ville> After a few weeks or so, I won't have a ThinkPad any more, so Ville> in addition to the already orphaned kernel-module-thinkpad, Ville> tpctl and configure-thinkpad, xosd and tpb are looking for a Ville> new maintainer (already added to the orphaned packages page in Ville> Wiki). I would take care of tpb if no one else wants to step up to do so. I guess configure-thinkpad and tpctl are in limbo since kernel-module-thinkpad isn't packageable? There wasn't ever a solution to packaging kernel modules in extras was there? Sorry you won't have a thinkpad anymore... they are great machines. ;) kevin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 iD8DBQFDnk7P3imCezTjY0ERAr4CAJ4slNCEXKSgmojdCRWeCXL2yF2JFgCfb3rZ WNK/M/Ij52rYX7j3Mj2dJ0M= =SqX7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 04:39:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 23:39:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169927] Review Request: scim-fcitx - Chinese IMEngine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130439.jBD4dkXi010636@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-fcitx - Chinese IMEngine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169927 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-12 23:39 EST ------- * RPM name is OK * Source scim-fcitx.3.1.1.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of scim-fcitx-tools looks OK * File list of scim-fcitx-tools looks OK Needs work: * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake) * rpmlint of scim-fcitx: Don't need empty file NEWS. * File list of scim-fcitx: %{_datadir}/scim and %{_libdir}/scim are already owned by scim package * %defattr(-, root, root) really should be %defattr(-, root, root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 05:17:56 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 00:17:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170905] Review Request: pcsc-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130517.jBD5HuRZ013546@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170905 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-13 00:17 EST ------- Courtesy of fedora-qa script: * RPM name is OK * Source pcsc-tools-1.4.1.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock, FC4 i386 * rpmlint of pcsc-tools looks OK * File list of pcsc-tools looks OK Needs work: * Source smartcard_list.txt is different from upstream, upstream is newer (wiki: QAChecklist item 2) * BuildRequires: sed should not be included (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#Exceptions) * Desktop file: the Categories tag should contain Application (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Tue Dec 13 06:41:35 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 07:41:35 +0100 Subject: rpms/nsd/devel nsd-2.3.3-checking.patch, NONE, 1.1 nsd-2.3.3.spec, NONE, 1.1 nsd.init, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 In-Reply-To: <200512130351.jBD3p5dP024578@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> References: <200512130351.jBD3p5dP024578@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1134456095.28658.99.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 22:51 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: > Author: pwouters > > Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/nsd/devel > In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24544/devel > --- NEW FILE nsd-2.3.3.spec --- > %pre > if getent passwd nsd >/dev/null 2>&1 ; then : ; else /usr/sbin/useradd -d /etc/nsd -r -s /sbin/nologin nsd >/dev/null 2>&1 || exit 1 ; fi This all is unnecessarily complicated. It can be replaced by a simple: /usr/sbin/useradd -d /etc/nsd -r -s /sbin/nologin nsd 2>/dev/null Also missing in your spec: Requires(pre): /usr/sbin/useradd and similar more Require(pre/postun/...) for other tools. Ralf From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 07:03:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:03:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170372] Review Request: moodle: A Course Management System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130703.jBD73EqY022626@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: moodle: A Course Management System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170372 ivazquez at ivazquez.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-13 02:03 EST ------- Built for FC4 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 07:55:11 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:55:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175566] Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130755.jBD7tAH2027900@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175566 adrian at lisas.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |adrian at lisas.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From adrian at lisas.de 2005-12-13 02:55 EST ------- * Source0 needs to specify full URL * you mix tabs and space so that it looks pretty strange in the browser and in my editor * qt-devel is already required by kdebase-devel * have a look at other KDE/QT spec files in Fedora Extras to see what they do with QTDIR and friends * You don't have to specify "--prefix=%{_prefix}" for %configure * The icon doesn't show up in the gnome menu; you have to update the icon cache (see Scriptlets page in wiki) * the package has to own at least following directories: %{_datadir}/apps/kbibtexpart/ %{_datadir}/apps/kbibtex/ %{_docdir}/HTML/en/kbibtex/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 08:32:40 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:32:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174486] Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130832.jBD8We8P000947@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-13 03:32 EST ------- Ok... :) convinced... There just is one problem. It builds fine on i386 in the buildsys but vor x86_64 the python file is installed in /usr/lib/python2.4 and not /usr/lib64/python.2.4 . Is this ok? I mean configure seems to detect it like that but seemed wrong to me on first glance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 08:33:03 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:33:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174490] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-evolution2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130833.jBD8X3ke001047@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-evolution2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174490 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-13 03:32 EST ------- Here: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/libopensync-plugin-evolution2.spec http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/libopensync-plugin-evolution2-0.18-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 08:33:30 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:33:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174492] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130833.jBD8XUci001112@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174492 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-13 03:33 EST ------- Here: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/libopensync-plugin-file.spec http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/libopensync-plugin-file-0.18-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 08:34:07 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:34:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174497] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-phyton In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130834.jBD8Y7Gv001220@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-phyton https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174497 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-13 03:33 EST ------- Yes it probably should own the directory :) http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/libopensync-plugin-python.spec http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/libopensync-plugin-python-0.18-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 08:45:03 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 03:45:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175144] Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130845.jBD8j3nl002414@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175144 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-13 03:44 EST ------- perl-Crypt-DES is bug 168580 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 09:07:32 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:07:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175144] Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130907.jBD97WIU004845@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175144 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-13 04:07 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I looked at packaging Net::SNMP, but it requires perl-Crypt-DES, which has a BSD > with advertising License, so not sure it would be acceptable. perl-Crypt-DES is currently under review for Extras (Bug 168580) and I'd appreciate some feedback on this license issue myself as the reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 09:14:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:14:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170905] Review Request: pcsc-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130914.jBD9EX1p005530@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170905 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-13 04:14 EST ------- Thanks. smartcard_list.txt is a moving target, updated to latest upstream and "fixed" the other issues too (although I don't quite agree with them). http://cachalot.mine.nu/4/SRPMS/pcsc-tools-1.4.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ville.skytta at iki.fi Tue Dec 13 09:24:12 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:24:12 +0200 Subject: rpms/nsd/devel nsd-2.3.3-checking.patch, NONE, 1.1 nsd-2.3.3.spec, NONE, 1.1 nsd.init, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 In-Reply-To: <1134456095.28658.99.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <200512130351.jBD3p5dP024578@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <1134456095.28658.99.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <1134465852.14948.62.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 07:41 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 22:51 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: > > > %pre > > if getent passwd nsd >/dev/null 2>&1 ; then : ; else /usr/sbin/useradd -d /etc/nsd -r -s /sbin/nologin nsd >/dev/null 2>&1 || exit 1 ; fi > > This all is unnecessarily complicated. > > It can be replaced by a simple: > /usr/sbin/useradd -d /etc/nsd -r -s /sbin/nologin nsd 2>/dev/null That line would need "|| :" appended in order to not break if the nsd user exists before installing the package (such as in package upgrades, or even some initial installs). From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 09:38:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:38:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175605] New: Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175605 Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: lmb at biosci.ki.se QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.biosci.ki.se/users/lmb/SRPMS/perl-IO-Multiplex.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.biosci.ki.se/users/lmb/SRPMS/perl-IO-Multiplex-1.08-3.src.rpm Description: IO::Multiplex is designed to take the effort out of managing multiple file handles. It is essentially a really fancy front end to the C loop, it buffers all input and output to/from the file handles. It can also accept incoming connections on one or more listen sockets. This is needed to properly extend perl-Net-Server with a working Multiplexing server. Which is needed to get postgrey to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 09:38:07 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:38:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130938.jBD9c7ED008410@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 lmb at biosci.ki.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175605 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ville.skytta at iki.fi Tue Dec 13 09:42:02 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:42:02 +0200 Subject: Orphaning bunch of packages (thinkpad, smart card, perl related) In-Reply-To: <20051213043216.3B67145437A@ningauble.scrye.com> References: <1134418020.14948.38.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> <20051213043216.3B67145437A@ningauble.scrye.com> Message-ID: <1134466922.14948.67.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 21:32 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I guess configure-thinkpad and tpctl are in limbo since > kernel-module-thinkpad isn't packageable? > There wasn't ever a solution to packaging kernel modules in extras was > there? Not yet. But it's in the works, and I hope it will be possible when FC5 is out (and after that, FC4 too). I can help with that stuff when it's clear what should be done. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 09:46:55 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:46:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512130946.jBD9ktQk009456@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-13 04:46 EST ------- * Tue Dec 13 2005 Enrico Scholz - 0.40-1.6 - use %%python_sitelib instead of %%_libdir/... - added Encoding entry in desktop file - removed the ui(...) virtual provides for now - made 'ksmarttray' an real package (instead of a subpackage) and added desktop entry - added -usermode subpackage which contains consolehelper wrappers for smart and use it in the -gtk subpackage - enhanced 'smart-update' script http://ensc.de/fedora/smart.spec http://ensc.de/fedora/smart-0.40-1.6.src.rpm ===================== > I don't know of a way to enumerate kernel variants but I don't > think listing a bunch of known ones would be much of a maintenance > burden. It wouldn't work for custom kernels though. If it helps, > kernel module packages can also be recognized by a name prefix or > something in the future once the proposal is finalized. ok, I added xen0 + xenU But the 'multiple-version' flag seems to be a match-whole-string thing. So there must be done something upstream. > What rpm versions does Requires(missingok) work with? (At least so > that the specfile parser groks it.) Should not matter. 'smart' itself requires at least rpm 4.4 and this version understands '(missingok)'. > Specifying "tui" or "gtk" as the version to ui(%name) sounds strange, > and now that the text UI is bundled in the main package, ui(%name) > doesn't seem to serve a purpose any more. ok, removed for now > ksmarttray build fails on FC5t1+rawhide, configure tries to use -lXt > but it isn't found. BuildRequires: libXt-devel fixes it. looks like a kdelibs-devel bug. I can not fix it now because I can not express this BuildRequires: for pre-FC5 rpms. When kdelibs-devel is not fixed till approval, I will add this buildrequires for the FC5 branch in the CVS. For now, I will assume builds on FC4. > How is ksmarttray supposed to be found by end users? Some kind of > menu entry (an usual one, or one that is listed in KDE's "add applet" > choices) should be included. I added a ksmarttray.desktop but do not know how to test it > I don't think sudo is the correct tool to handle updating with > ksmarttray, something with the ability to prompt for the root > password in a GUI would sound better (eg. consolehelper and > friends). I think, sudo is the correct tool. 'ksmarttray' seems to execute 'smart-update' regularly and I would dislike periodically appearing dialog boxes which are asking for a root password. > IMO smart-gtk should be changed to use consolehelper too. ok, added -usermode subpackage which provides the corresponding wrappers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 10:09:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 05:09:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175566] Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131009.jBDA92AL013266@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175566 ------- Additional Comments From ch.nolte at fh-wolfenbuettel.de 2005-12-13 05:08 EST ------- Thank you for reviewing my package. I have fixed the problems. Furthermore I have added a workaround for the icons which are installed as crystalsvg icons, which prevents the icons from being visible when some other iconset is used in gnome. I will contact the author about this issue. Spec file: http://public.fh-wolfenbuettel.de/~noltec/open-source/kbibtex/kbibtex.spec SRPM: http://public.fh-wolfenbuettel.de/~noltec/open-source/kbibtex/kbibtex-0.1.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 10:12:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 05:12:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171526] Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131012.jBDACfQ4013677@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171526 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-13 05:12 EST ------- Without testing this I would bet that if you add -lgcc it will work... Though this is not a good way to fix this. Anybody got a clue what is wrong here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 10:13:21 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 05:13:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174490] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-evolution2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131013.jBDADLJQ013773@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-evolution2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174490 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-13 05:13 EST ------- Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File lists look OK * Works fine APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 10:20:47 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 05:20:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131020.jBDAKl1x014475@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-13 05:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > - use %%python_sitelib instead of %%_libdir/... This will most likely break on x86_64. I have no way to test it, but I'm pretty sure that you should be using %python_sitearch instead (in fedora-rpmdevtools python spec template terms). > - added -usermode subpackage which contains consolehelper wrappers for > smart and use it in the -gtk subpackage I wonder what benefit does having this in a subpackage have over just including it in the main package or the -gtk subpackage? > ok, I added xen0 + xenU Please add xen-hypervisor and xen-guest too, that's the way they'll be called in FC5. Also, "kernel-devel" is not enough, there are -devel packages for all of the variants (kernel-smp-devel etc). Oh, and one typo: s/bigmen/bigmem/ (and IIRC there's a hugemem kernel in RHEL too). > > What rpm versions does Requires(missingok) work with? (At least so > > that the specfile parser groks it.) > > Should not matter. 'smart' itself requires at least rpm 4.4 and this > version understands '(missingok)'. Wouldn't it be appropriate to add the corresponding versioned "BuildRequires: rpm-build >= 4.4" and "Requires: rpm-python >= 4.4" dependencies, then? > > ksmarttray build fails on FC5t1+rawhide, configure tries to use -lXt > > but it isn't found. BuildRequires: libXt-devel fixes it. > > looks like a kdelibs-devel bug. I'm not so sure about that, see contrib/ksmarttray/admin/acinclude.m4.in. Many configure scripts tend to test for X presence using Xt, even if they don't actually use Xt themselves for anything else. > When kdelibs-devel is not fixed till approval, I will add this > buildrequires for the FC5 branch in the CVS. For now, I will assume > builds on FC4. Ack. > I added a ksmarttray.desktop but do not know how to test it I'll try it out and report back. > I think, sudo is the correct tool. 'ksmarttray' seems to execute > 'smart-update' regularly and I would dislike periodically appearing > dialog boxes which are asking for a root password. Good point. OTOH consolehelper could be used to launch ksmarttray itself, but I'm not 100% sure if that's the best approach either. I won't consider this a blocker (but others are of course free to disagree, though). One new finding: -gtk has superfluous Requires(pre) and Requires(postun) for the main package, probably a remainder from the ui(%name) and separate text UI package times. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 10:28:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 05:28:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174486] Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131028.jBDASkDM015297@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-13 05:28 EST ------- Seems wrong to me too, but it looks like configure calls python -c "from distutils import sysconfig; print sysconfig.get_python_lib(0,0,prefix='/usr')" which should give the correct path. Could someone with access to an x86_64 box confirm this ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 10:34:47 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 05:34:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174497] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131034.jBDAYlS9015986@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174497 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libopensync-|Review Request: libopensync- |plugin-phyton |plugin-python OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-13 05:34 EST ------- Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File list looks OK * Works fine APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 11:01:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:01:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174492] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131101.jBDB1SYX021663@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174492 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-13 06:01 EST ------- Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of libopensync-plugin-file looks OK * File list of libopensync-plugin-file looks OK * Works fine APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 11:17:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:17:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175605] Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131117.jBDBHw84025111@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175605 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-13 06:17 EST ------- NEEDSWORK Blockers: * License is Artistic only. * Use "%check" instead of "%check ||:" in spec. Non blockers * Get rid of the %define rname at the beginning of the spec. * Use of "by-modules" CPAN URLs is discouraged, better use an "authors/id" URL, e.g. Source: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/B/BB/BBB/IO-Multiplex-1.08.tar.gz Problematic: The package conditionally depends on Time::HiRes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 11:33:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:33:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170616] Review Request: ipxripd - IPX RIP/SAP daemon - routing for IPX networks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131133.jBDBXdvq027909@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipxripd - IPX RIP/SAP daemon - routing for IPX networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170616 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-13 06:33 EST ------- > I had to modprobe ipx before ipxd would stay running and not immediately exit. Normally ipxd is run after the IPX is configured by init scripts (therefore ipx module is already loaded, ipx interfaces are activated etc.). > %defattr(-,root,root) should be %defattr(-,root,root,-) OK Thanks for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 11:58:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 06:58:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174486] Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131158.jBDBw9K4031949@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-13 06:57 EST ------- From https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2005-January/msg00349.html it looks like configure should actually call "get_python_lib(1,0,prefix='/usr')" (first argument should be 1). Try patching the script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 12:48:42 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 07:48:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171526] Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131248.jBDCmg9G004409@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171526 ------- Additional Comments From kevin.kofler at chello.at 2005-12-13 07:48 EST ------- Try -fno-stack-protector. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 13:29:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 08:29:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171526] Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131329.jBDDTCZI008923@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171526 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-13 08:28 EST ------- Hm, would like to know if this really fixes it because on some other packages that was the first thing that came to my mind but had no effect... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 13:46:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 08:46:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175276] Review Request: gift: daemon for communicating with filesharing protocols In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131346.jBDDkCP2011276@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gift: daemon for communicating with filesharing protocols https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175276 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-13 08:46 EST ------- * When building in mock, at the end of configure : use libmagic............: no -> missing BR: file * Summary should be capitalized Works fine otherwise. Peer to peer software is not listed in ForbiddenItems, so I guess giFT is OK for inclusion in Fedora, right ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From paul at city-fan.org Tue Dec 13 13:55:50 2005 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:55:50 +0000 Subject: rpms/nsd/devel nsd.spec,1.1,1.2 In-Reply-To: <200512131349.jBDDnx3I012903@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> References: <200512131349.jBDDnx3I012903@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Message-ID: <439ED2E6.6060501@city-fan.org> Paul Wouters (pwouters) wrote: > Author: pwouters > > Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/nsd/devel > In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12848 > > Modified Files: > nsd.spec > Log Message: > Added dependancies on openssl (I thought this was in the base system) > and openssl-devel (should have been part of BuildRequires). > > > > Index: nsd.spec > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/nsd/devel/nsd.spec,v > retrieving revision 1.1 > retrieving revision 1.2 > diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2 > --- nsd.spec 13 Dec 2005 04:10:38 -0000 1.1 > +++ nsd.spec 13 Dec 2005 13:49:26 -0000 1.2 > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > Summary: NSD is a complete implementation of an authoritative DNS name server > Name: nsd > Version: 2.3.3 > -Release: 2%{?dist} > +Release: 3%{?dist} > License: BSD-like > Url: http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/ > Source: http://open.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/nsd/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ > Patch0: nsd-2.3.3-checking.patch > Group: System Environment/Daemons > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > -#Requires: > -BuildRequires: flex > +Requires: openssl > +BuildRequires: flex, openssl-devel The Requires: openssl shouldn't be necessary as RPM's automatic library deps should handle that, if the package has been built against the openssl libs. Paul. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 14:05:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:05:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175605] Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131405.jBDE58aU014008@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175605 ------- Additional Comments From lmb at biosci.ki.se 2005-12-13 09:04 EST ------- I've asked the authors of they can change the license. The spec file has been cleaned up. About the part that is deemed problematic... The code snippet looks like this: BEGIN { eval { # Can optionally use Hi Res timers if available require Time::HiRes; Time::HiRes->import ('time'); } }; I really don't see a problem with this. BTW, perl-IO-Multiplex is eval-required by the allready included perl-Net-Server package. It's needed by postgrey, the real reason for this excercise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 14:16:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:16:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174486] Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131416.jBDEG9DD014993@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-13 09:15 EST ------- Thanks, that fixed it... build for fc4 and fc5. fc3 is blocked by fc3s sqlite version see bug #175607. I will close this for now and build fc3 when/if a newer sqlite version will be released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 14:16:21 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:16:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174494] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-irmc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131416.jBDEGLIJ015041@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-irmc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174494 Bug 174494 depends on bug 174486, which changed state. Bug 174486 Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 14:16:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:16:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166547] Review Request: multisync - Calendar (and other PIM data) synchronization program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131416.jBDEGXmW015123@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multisync - Calendar (and other PIM data) synchronization program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166547 Bug 166547 depends on bug 174486, which changed state. Bug 174486 Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 14:16:45 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:16:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174588] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-gpe In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131416.jBDEGjcl015164@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-gpe https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174588 Bug 174588 depends on bug 174486, which changed state. Bug 174486 Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 14:16:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:16:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174495] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-kdepim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131416.jBDEGxhO015227@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-kdepim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174495 Bug 174495 depends on bug 174486, which changed state. Bug 174486 Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 14:17:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:17:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174496] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-palm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131417.jBDEHG02015303@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-palm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174496 Bug 174496 depends on bug 174486, which changed state. Bug 174486 Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 14:17:17 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:17:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174492] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131417.jBDEHH7G015330@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174492 Bug 174492 depends on bug 174486, which changed state. Bug 174486 Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 14:17:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:17:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174490] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-evolution2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131417.jBDEHTOS015372@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-evolution2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174490 Bug 174490 depends on bug 174486, which changed state. Bug 174486 Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 14:17:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:17:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174497] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131417.jBDEHkf8015406@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174497 Bug 174497 depends on bug 174486, which changed state. Bug 174486 Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Tue Dec 13 14:23:42 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:23:42 +0100 Subject: buildsystem not taking jobs? In-Reply-To: <1134413227.8216.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20051212051429.A1EB0180813@magilla.sf.frob.com> <1134392683.16482.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1134396236.28658.19.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1134413227.8216.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1134483823.30243.45.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 13:47 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 15:03 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > Any chances to see this fixed? > > > > x86_64: > > > > Error: Missing Dependency: libdl.so.2 is needed by package libsetrans > > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by package > > libsetrans > > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by package > > libsetrans > Jeremy rebuilt libsetrans today with a fix, so it should be out tomorrow > in Rawhide. Please let the list know if there are still issues on > x86_64 after libsetrans-0.1.11-3 comes out. Thanks, this problem seems to be resolved, now. Ralf From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 14:20:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:20:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166549] Review Request: synce-gnomevfs - Gnome-vfs module for synce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131420.jBDEKxUg015622@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-gnomevfs - Gnome-vfs module for synce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166549 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-13 09:20 EST ------- imported and build for devel... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 14:29:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:29:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174495] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-kdepim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131429.jBDETFg5016639@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-kdepim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174495 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-13 09:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I didn't find any packaging errors with this plugin, but at the end of the > synchronization, it pops up a kcrash dialog. I've tried adding back the *.la > files and rebuilding it on my system (not in mock), but it still crashes. > Any idea ? What are you trying to sync? I tried evo2 <-> kdepim and it worked a bit... It has trouble with some of the entries but it did not crash... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 14:37:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:37:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175605] Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131437.jBDEbxTx017885@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175605 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-13 09:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I've asked the authors of they can change the license. > The spec file has been cleaned up. Could it be that you miss-read my remark? The Artistic license is fine for includion into FE, it's just that your spec file said "GPL or Artistic", which is apparently wrong. > About the part that is deemed problematic... The code snippet looks like this: > BEGIN { > eval { > # Can optionally use Hi Res timers if available > require Time::HiRes; > Time::HiRes->import ('time'); > } > }; > > I really don't see a problem with this. The problem is: Conditional requires, like this one lead to non-deterministic "make check" results, and can cause Heisenbugs, depending on if the conditional module (here: Time::HiRes) is installed or not. This isn't much of a problem (Therefore I wrote "Non-Blocker"), but can be problematic in longer terms. One way to circumvent this kind of problems would be to make this conditional dependencies mandatory at run-time (Require: perl(Time::HiRes)) or at build-time ("BuildRequires: perl(Time::HiRes)", even "BuildConflicts: perl(Time::HiRes)" could be worth a thought). The decision on what to do about it is up to you. Even not doing anything about it and leaving things as they currently are is absolutely fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 14:45:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:45:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166551] Review Request: synce-trayicon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131445.jBDEjCUo018910@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-trayicon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166551 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-13 09:45 EST ------- make install did not work but I was commented out in the first version as well wasn't it? http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/synce-trayicon-0.9.0-3.src.rpm http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/synce-trayicon.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 14:47:17 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:47:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175623] New: Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175623 Summary: Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: icon at fedoraproject.org QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://linux.duke.edu/~icon/misc/fe/yaz.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://linux.duke.edu/~icon/misc/fe/yaz-2.1.10-1.src.rpm Description: YAZ is a programmers? toolkit supporting the development of Z39.50/SRW/SRU clients and servers. Z39.50-2003 (version 3) as well as SRW/SRU version 1.1 are supported in both the client and server roles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 14:47:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 09:47:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131447.jBDElNt1019220@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 icon at fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175623 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 15:01:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:01:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175605] Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131501.jBDF1f03020841@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175605 ------- Additional Comments From lmb at biosci.ki.se 2005-12-13 10:01 EST ------- Yup, misread you but fixed the problem all the same. ;-) For the time being I'll leave the perl run-time dependency as is. After all, I'm allready chasing another one. So, one dependecy at a time... Could you check again: Spec Name or Url: http://www.biosci.ki.se/users/lmb/SRPMS/perl-IO-Multiplex.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.biosci.ki.se/users/lmb/SRPMS/perl-IO-Multiplex-1.08-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 15:07:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:07:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174486] Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131507.jBDF7caw021794@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-13 10:07 EST ------- The best thing to do would be to report this configure bug upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 15:10:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:10:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174486] Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131510.jBDFAGhs022105@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync - A synchronization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174486 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-13 10:10 EST ------- done already :) http://www.opensync.org/ticket/134 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Tue Dec 13 15:16:21 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:16:21 +0100 Subject: However, no Job ID was provided in the time required Message-ID: <1134486981.30243.53.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> grumble, .... # make plague .... Package ... enqueued. (However, no Job ID was provided in the time required) ... the daily buildsystem breakdown, as it seems to me ... ;) Ralf From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 15:39:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:39:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174495] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-kdepim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131539.jBDFdnAs025879@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-kdepim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174495 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-13 10:39 EST ------- I'm syncing kdepim with a directory (file-sync plugin). Sometimes it pops up the kcrash dialog : The sync was successful KCrash: Application 'libopensync-kdepim-plugin' crashing... Sometimes it ouputs: The sync was successful *** glibc detected *** msynctool: free(): invalid pointer: 0x08eff0c0 *** And stops there. It does not seem to be related to packaging, so it should not block this package (opensync, and particularly the kde plugin, is under heavy development at the moment). But you'll be the one assigned to bug reports, so be prepared... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de Tue Dec 13 15:55:03 2005 From: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de (Andreas Bierfert) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:55:03 +0100 Subject: However, no Job ID was provided in the time required In-Reply-To: <1134486981.30243.53.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <1134486981.30243.53.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <439EEED7.60901@lowlatency.de> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Corsepius wrote: > ... the daily buildsystem breakdown, as it seems to me ... ;) Yes same here ... - -- Andreas Bierfert | http://awbsworld.de | GPG: C58CF1CB andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de | http://lowlatency.de | signed/encrypted phone: +49 2402 102373 | cell: +49 172 9789968 | mail preferred -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDnu7XQEQyPsWM8csRAqNOAKCWLP4y0oWozSFTrtThh1XI8aH9bQCgpRsL elH21OXVRdguhCbleQafaGM= =V6np -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 16:02:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:02:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175631] New: Review Request: fedora-package-config-smart - Configuration files for the smart package manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175631 Summary: Review Request: fedora-package-config-smart - Configuration files for the smart package manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/fedora-package-config-smart.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/smart-0.40-23.src.rpm Description: Configuration files for smart. These are split off the main package for the same reasons yum's and up2date's config files are split off into fedora-release. These config files (channel) are the *.repo config files from fedora-release transcribed for smart. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 16:02:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:02:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175630] New: Review Request: smart - Next generation package handling tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175630 Summary: Review Request: smart - Next generation package handling tool Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/smart.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/smart-0.40-23.src.rpm Description: "The Smart Package Manager project has the ambitious objective of creating smart and portable algorithms for solving adequately the problem of managing software upgrading and installation. This tool works in all major distributions, and will bring notable advantages over native tools currently in use (APT, APT-RPM, YUM, URPMI, etc)." o Config files (channels) for Fedora Core 4 are in a separate submission o Derived from ATrpms' packages, adapted to Fedora Extras guidelines. o Known to work under i386 and x86_64, ppc should pose no threats o conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pam.d/smart-root: similar to what up2date does -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 16:02:40 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:02:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131602.jBDG2eEm029928@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175630 BugsThisDependsOn| |175631 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 16:02:45 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:02:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131602.jBDG2jxr029943@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175630 BugsThisDependsOn| |175631 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 16:06:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:06:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175630] Review Request: smart - Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131606.jBDG6b8j030256@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart - Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175630 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2005-12-13 11:06 EST ------- The config files are submitted in bug #175631 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 16:06:57 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:06:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175276] Review Request: gift: daemon for communicating with filesharing protocols In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131606.jBDG6vdL030320@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gift: daemon for communicating with filesharing protocols https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175276 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-13 11:06 EST ------- * Tue Dec 13 2005 Rex Dieter 0.11.8.1-2 - Summary: Capitalize - BR: file (libmagic) Spec Name or Url:http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/gift-0.11.8.1-2.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/gift-0.11.8.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 16:11:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:11:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168580] Review Request: perl-Crypt-DES In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131611.jBDGBd2h031038@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-DES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168580 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2005-12-13 11:11 EST ------- Hi Paul, I agree that the license may be problematic. I think everything about the license is OK (doesn't voilate any Fedora guidelines) except the part about advertising: "3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software must display the following acknowledgement: This product includes software developed by Systemics Ltd (http://www.systemics.com/)" which is annoying. The key question seems to be: would simply listing this package in a Fedora Extras repository constitute "advertisement" and thus trigger the clause above? I think not, but IANAL. Or would listing this package as part of a Fedora release notes trigger the clause? Maybe or maybe not. This really ought to be reviewed by Fedora legal or perhaps the SC. Could you please contact them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 16:12:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:12:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175630] Review Request: smart - Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131612.jBDGCRim031167@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart - Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175630 ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com 2005-12-13 11:12 EST ------- Why are the config files in a separate package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From dcbw at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 16:17:40 2005 From: dcbw at redhat.com (Dan Williams) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:17:40 -0500 Subject: However, no Job ID was provided in the time required In-Reply-To: <1134486981.30243.53.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <1134486981.30243.53.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <1134490661.2950.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 16:16 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > grumble, .... > > # make plague > .... > Package ... enqueued. (However, no Job ID was provided in the time > required) > > ... the daily buildsystem breakdown, as it seems to me ... ;) Geez, people keep killing jobs, and since the kill command didn't trap socket.timeout, boom :) Anyway, that's fixed now. Dan From dennis at ausil.us Tue Dec 13 16:25:48 2005 From: dennis at ausil.us (Dennis Gilmore) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:25:48 -0600 Subject: rpms/configure-thinkpad/devel configure-thinkpad.spec,1.9,1.10 In-Reply-To: <200512131617.jBDGHGau021130@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> References: <200512131617.jBDGHGau021130@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Message-ID: <200512131025.48702.dennis@ausil.us> On Tuesday 13 December 2005 10:16, Ville Skytta wrote: > +# TODO: When running KDE, kded seems to grab /dev/thinkpad if it exists, > so +# we cannot access it. Maybe add NotShowIn=KDE to the desktop entry > unless +# a better solution is found? > + > Name: configure-thinkpad > Version: 0.9 > Release: 2 > - > Summary: Graphical ThinkPad configuration utility > > Group: Applications/System kcontrol has the ability to configure configure the think pad. so i think it would be fine to not have it available in KDE Dennis From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 16:25:48 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:25:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172869] Review Request: nss-mdns In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131625.jBDGPmH0032523@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss-mdns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172869 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2005-12-13 11:25 EST ------- Updated to 0.7: http://files.hadess.net/redhat/perso/source/nss-mdns-0.7-1.src.rpm http://files.hadess.net/redhat/perso/spec/nss-mdns.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 16:27:36 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:27:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175630] Review Request: smart - Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131627.jBDGRajg000367@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart - Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175630 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-13 11:27 EST ------- Hello Axel! :) We have already smart + configs in progress, so I'm marking these as dupes, feel free to participate in the ongoing reviews! *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 175438 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 16:27:44 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:27:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131627.jBDGRidT000416@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-13 11:27 EST ------- *** Bug 175630 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 16:28:01 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:28:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175631] Review Request: fedora-package-config-smart - Configuration files for the smart package manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131628.jBDGS1Vu000469@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-package-config-smart - Configuration files for the smart package manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175631 Bug 175631 depends on bug 175630, which changed state. Bug 175630 Summary: Review Request: smart - Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175630 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 16:28:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:28:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175631] Review Request: fedora-package-config-smart - Configuration files for the smart package manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131628.jBDGSEW3000522@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-package-config-smart - Configuration files for the smart package manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175631 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | Bug 175631 depends on bug 175630, which changed state. Bug 175630 Summary: Review Request: smart - Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175630 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |DUPLICATE Status|NEW |CLOSED ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-13 11:28 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 175473 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 16:28:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:28:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175473] Review Request: smart-channel -- Specifications for smart channels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131628.jBDGSVT4000599@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart-channel -- Specifications for smart channels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175473 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-13 11:28 EST ------- *** Bug 175631 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 16:38:13 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:38:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131638.jBDGcDxi001818@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-13 11:38 EST ------- Well, I've successfully tested l2tpd (witn WinXP client). One problem (perhaps for upstream): When I detach at WinXP side, pppd daemon on the Fedora box still exist (and seem to be frozen). The IP address are deleted from ppp0 (!), pppd don't react on signals (only "kill -9" is useful), "strace -p" shows that pppd does some futex(2) syscall... Also one little issue: After "ikelifetime" (default 1 hour) is expired, the connection is dropped (it seems the "rekey" mechanism does not work with WinXp box). Possible solution is to increase "ikelifetime" up to 8h (as "keylife" default value). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 16:42:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:42:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174529] Review Request: clearsilver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131642.jBDGg004002365@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clearsilver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174529 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-13 11:41 EST ------- No news from upstream yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 13 16:48:34 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:48:34 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051213164834.BFF088001@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 10 blogtk-1.1-5.fc3 gtkwave-1.3.81-1.fc3 ircd-hybrid-7.2.0-4.fc3 kasumi-1.0-1.fc3 krusader-1.60.1-1.fc3 nmh-1.1-13.fc3 perl-Crypt-DH-0.06-3.fc3 perl-Readonly-1.03-4.fc3 perl-Readonly-XS-1.04-3.fc3 synce-gnomevfs-0.9.0-2.fc3 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 13 16:58:22 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:58:22 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051213165822.E2EE78001@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 17 blogtk-1.1-5.fc4 cernlib-2005-8.fc4.3 gnome-sudoku-0.3.4-1.fc4 gtkwave-1.3.81-1.fc4 ircd-hybrid-7.2.0-4.fc4 kasumi-1.0-1.fc4 kdesvn-0.7.1-1.fc4 koffice-1.4.2-2.fc4 krusader-1.60.1-1.fc4 libopensync-0.18-5.fc4 monotone-0.24-1.fc4 moodle-1.5.3-1.fc4 nmh-1.1-13.fc4 perl-Crypt-DH-0.06-3.fc4 perl-Readonly-1.03-4.fc4 perl-Readonly-XS-1.04-3.fc4 verbiste-0.1.14-1.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 16:57:40 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:57:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172871] Review Request: driftnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131657.jBDGveDs004482@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: driftnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172871 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2005-12-13 11:57 EST ------- The mkdtemp in the gentoo patch didn't prefix the template with the user's tempdir. Updated packages: http://files.hadess.net/redhat/perso/source/driftnet-0.1.6-6.src.rpm http://files.hadess.net/redhat/perso/spec/driftnet.spec Adrian, do you want me to fix more compilation warnings with that, or? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 17:07:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:07:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131707.jBDH7ZhM006202@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2005-12-13 12:07 EST ------- I accidentially submitted smart for inclusion, too (see duplicate above). I think most parts are similar, Enrico, maybe you'd like to check anyway. One thing though: python_sitelib or python_archlib? smart installs so files under the python subdir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 13 17:13:06 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:13:06 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051213171306.999C88001@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 19 OpenSceneGraph-0.9.9-5.fc5 blogtk-1.1-5.fc5 dkms-2.0.9-1.fc5 gnome-sudoku-0.3.4-1.fc5 goffice-0.1.2-3 gtkmathview-0.7.6-1 gtkwave-1.3.81-1.fc5 ipxripd-0.8-2.fc5 libapreq2-2.07-0.2.rc3.fc5 libopensync-0.18-5.fc5 libopensync-plugin-evolution2-0.18-3.fc5 libopensync-plugin-file-0.18-3.fc5 libopensync-plugin-palm-0.18-2.fc5 moodle-1.5.3-1.fc5 nsd-2.3.3-4.fc5 paps-0.6.1-1.fc5 perl-Crypt-DH-0.06-3.fc5 synce-gnomevfs-0.9.0-2.fc5 wv2-0.2.2-6.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 17:09:57 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:09:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174490] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-evolution2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131709.jBDH9vgp006596@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-evolution2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174490 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-13 12:09 EST ------- imported an build on fc5 Thanks for the review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 17:10:05 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:10:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174492] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-file In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131710.jBDHA5Pp006625@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174492 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-13 12:09 EST ------- imported an build on fc5 Thanks for this review as well :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 17:10:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:10:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174496] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-palm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131710.jBDHAQGg006681@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-palm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174496 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-13 12:10 EST ------- imported an build on fc5 An not to forget this one THANKS :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 17:11:32 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:11:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131711.jBDHBWbL006786@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-13 12:11 EST ------- * Tue Dec 13 2005 Enrico Scholz - 0.40-1.7 - use %%python_sitearch instead of %%python_sitelib - added yet more variants for the multi-version kernel packages ========== > > - use %%python_sitelib instead of %%_libdir/... > > This will most likely break on x86_64. I have no way to test it, but > I'm pretty sure that you should be using %python_sitearch instead (in > fedora-rpmdevtools python spec template terms). ok, I use sitearch now but can not test it > > - added -usermode subpackage which contains consolehelper wrappers for > > smart and use it in the -gtk subpackage > > I wonder what benefit does having this in a subpackage have over > just including it in the main package or the -gtk subpackage? * -usermode is not required for core-functionality * -usermode adds non-trivial deps ==> -usermode can not be in the core package * -usermode can be used for the text-interface too * -gtk is not required for the text-interface ==> -usermode and -gtk should not be in the same package > Wouldn't it be appropriate to add the corresponding versioned "BuildRequires: > rpm-build >= 4.4" and "Requires: rpm-python >= 4.4" dependencies, then? IMO, such versioned dependencies are pretty useless in the age of missing-epoch == epoch-zero. rpm does not provide a way to express a dependency on a certain upstream version (e.g. 'rpm = 1:4.0' would fulfill the Requires: but would not have the needed functionality). Versioned deps can be used to exclude certain packages in a well-known environment. And this well-known environment is FC4+ in this case which is known to have the required 'rpm' package. > One new finding: -gtk has superfluous Requires(pre) and > Requires(postun) for the main package, probably a remainder from the > ui(%name) and separate text UI package times. It's intentionally. I want to make sure that 'smart-gtk' gets installed after 'smart' and removed before it, because -gtk uses directories from the base package which would stay when 'smart' is removed before 'smart-gtk'. afaik, pre/postun modifiers are the only way *guaranting* that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 17:29:42 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:29:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166550] Review Request: synce-software-manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131729.jBDHTg59009369@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-software-manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166550 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-13 12:29 EST ------- imported and build, THANKS you both for your time -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 17:36:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:36:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175494] Review Request: new In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131736.jBDHaVax010318@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175494 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-13 12:36 EST ------- - package meets naming guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC4 i386 - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Stuff needing work: - warnings about duplicate files - %doc %{_mandir} is useless, rpm knows about man already - empty NEWS and FAQ aren't useful, don't include - Don't need to list every file in %files, including a directory includes its contents. Wildcards accepted, useful for including everything but not owning the directory. So you can do: %files %{_bindir}/* %{_datadir}/new %{_mandir}/*/* - Your header and pkgconfig files should be in a seperate devel sub package. This devel package should require the base new package, the exact same version. See PackageReviewGuidelines on the wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 17:49:11 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:49:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131749.jBDHnBLu012423@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2005-12-13 12:49 EST ------- If I wrote 'Requires: %{name}-%{version} in the spec file, I got the following messages during installing the packages: [root at myhome pclinux]# cd redhat/RPMS/i686/ [root at myhome i686]# rpm -i gnu-smalltalk-2.2-5.i686.rpm gnu-smalltalk-devel-2.2-5.i686.rpm gnu-smalltalk-emacs-2.2-5.i686.rpm Fehler: Failed dependencies: gnu-smalltalk-2.2 is needed by gnu-smalltalk-devel-2.2-5.i686 gnu-smalltalk-2.2 is needed by gnu-smalltalk-emacs-2.2-5.i686 [root at myhome i686]# Question: What should I do? I'm using rpm-4.4.1. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 17:50:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:50:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173111] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131750.jBDHoY8C012685@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173111 ivazquez at ivazquez.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|bdpepple at ameritech.net |ivazquez at ivazquez.net OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-13 12:50 EST ------- - desktop-file-utils is missing from BuildRequires With that fixed gdesklets builds in mock and runs, although I have a few problems with it here and there that aren't related to the packaging. Once that issue is corrected the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 17:51:55 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:51:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131751.jBDHpt2W012972@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-13 12:51 EST ------- URL to latest so far: http://ensc.de/fedora/smart-0.40-1.7.src.rpm (In reply to comment #14) > * -usermode adds non-trivial deps Hmm, could you elaborate what these are? glib2, libattr, pam, libselinux and libuser sound like things that are pretty hard to get rid of in a functional FC setup. > And this well-known environment is FC4+ in this case > which is known to have the required 'rpm' package. Fine with me. rpm doesn't have an epoch so that problem doesn't currently exist in FC/RHEL, but the versioned deps would help people who try to rebuild this for earlier distro versions or RHEL. (Some kind of support for those is sort of implied elsewhere in the package, eg. smart-fedora-setup.) > I want to make sure that 'smart-gtk' gets > installed after 'smart' and removed before it, because -gtk uses > directories from the base package which would stay when 'smart' is > removed before 'smart-gtk'. Plain requires is fine for install time. And at install time it wouldn't matter anyway as long as all dirs are owned. > afaik, pre/postun modifiers are the only way *guaranting* that. Even if postun may work with the erase ordering, I wouldn't count on that abuse (adding a dependency for a %postun script which doesn't exist). The only way to properly fix this is in rpm. It isn't known to hurt though, so if you insist on keeping it, not a blocker. smart-fedora-setup doesn't appear to do anything useful when run as non-root, maybe move it to /usr/sbin? See also bug 175630 comment 2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 17:59:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:59:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131759.jBDHxGkt014492@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-13 12:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > If I wrote 'Requires: %{name}-%{version} in the spec file, I got the following > messages during installing the packages: > > [root at myhome pclinux]# cd redhat/RPMS/i686/ > [root at myhome i686]# rpm -i gnu-smalltalk-2.2-5.i686.rpm > gnu-smalltalk-devel-2.2-5.i686.rpm gnu-smalltalk-emacs-2.2-5.i686.rpm > Fehler: Failed dependencies: > gnu-smalltalk-2.2 is needed by gnu-smalltalk-devel-2.2-5.i686 > gnu-smalltalk-2.2 is needed by gnu-smalltalk-emacs-2.2-5.i686 Requires: %{name} = %{version} or even: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 18:01:11 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:01:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175653] New: Review Request: TEST PACKAGE, GNORE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175653 Summary: Review Request: TEST PACKAGE, GNORE Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com THIS IS A TEST -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 18:01:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:01:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 163776] Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131801.jBDI1TsG014892@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Tracker: New Extras packages to be reviewed Alias: FE-NEW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163776 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |175653 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 18:15:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:15:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174377] Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131815.jBDIF2mn017255@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request:gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de 2005-12-13 13:14 EST ------- Thank you for your tip. The next release of the package can you found at: SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnu-smalltalk/gnu-smalltalk-2.2-5.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/gnu-smalltalk/gnu-smalltalk.spec Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 18:48:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:48:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175662] New: Review Request: hopefully last TEST Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175662 Summary: Review Request: hopefully last TEST Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com TEST -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From wtogami at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 18:57:29 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:57:29 -0500 Subject: Tracker Filtered Message-ID: <439F1999.9010001@redhat.com> I think I figured out how to filter out the tracker bugmail that happens whenever a new package is submitted. Please let me know if you see any bad list behavior after this change. Thanks, Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 19:16:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:16:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168580] Review Request: perl-Crypt-DES In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131916.jBDJGVBN024479@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-DES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168580 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2005-12-13 14:16 EST ------- Wait, I've made a silly mistake! Please ignore comment #3 above. I'm now quite certain that the license is OK and heres the logic: 1) comparing them line-by-line, its obviously the "original BSD license" as described at: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses 2) according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Legal the original BSD is clearly one of the OK licenses for Fedora Extras -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 19:28:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:28:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171156] Review Request: spin - On-the-fly, LTL model checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131928.jBDJSTd2026740@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spin - On-the-fly, LTL model checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171156 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-13 14:28 EST ------- Someone familar with legal documents should look over the commercial license imposed on commercial use, and whether this is an allowable restriction at all. http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/what/spin/spin_license.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 19:35:20 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:35:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173295] Review Request: python-4Suite-XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131935.jBDJZK1J027744@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-4Suite-XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173295 mitr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://people.redhat.com/mit|http://people.redhat.com/mit |r/extras/python-4Suite-XML- |r/extras/python-4Suite-XML- |1.0-0.1.b2.src.rpm |1.0-0.1.b3.src.rpm ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2005-12-13 14:35 EST ------- Updated to 4Suite-XML-1.0b3. Could I get a sponsor to review the package, please? I'll promise to review >=3 other packages in return. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 19:41:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:41:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172871] Review Request: driftnet In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512131941.jBDJf0sV028331@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: driftnet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172871 adrian at lisas.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From adrian at lisas.de 2005-12-13 14:40 EST ------- * rpmlint is almost happy: W: driftnet conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/security/console.apps/driftnet W: driftnet no-dependency-on usermode-consoleonly (can be ignored from my point of view) * clean installation and removal * builds in "mock -r fedora-development-i386-core" * source matches upstream * spec looks good (almost; see below) * patches look sane APPROVED driftnet-0.1.6-pam.config: using "auth include system-auth" instead of "auth required pam_stack.so service=system-auth" like other applications from rawhide would be a good idea. The other warnings are not nice but at least they do not say that it is a security risk to use them. If you like you can of course fix more warnings :-) One more fix would be necessary before you upload it. There is a rm -rf in %prep this should be moved to the beginning of %install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 20:28:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:28:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170905] Review Request: pcsc-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512132028.jBDKSG1k004722@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170905 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-13 15:28 EST ------- - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC4 i386 - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file properly installed APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 21:03:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:03:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171638] Review Request: perl-IPC-Shareable - Share Perl variables between processes In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512132103.jBDL39tW008177@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IPC-Shareable - Share Perl variables between processes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171638 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2005-12-13 16:03 EST ------- Branches: FC-4 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 21:08:57 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:08:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173040] Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512132108.jBDL8v6K009720@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173040 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-12-13 16:08 EST ------- OK APPRPROVED, and I am sponsoring you now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 21:09:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:09:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172872] Review Request: sloccount In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512132109.jBDL9Z7E009793@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sloccount https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172872 ------- Additional Comments From bnocera at redhat.com 2005-12-13 16:09 EST ------- " - the source does not match upstream according to:" I'll blame Scott on that one, I used his source RPM as a starting point. I'll fix up the rest of the .spec when I have a moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 21:13:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:13:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175144] Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512132113.jBDLDnnX010594@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175144 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |ed at eh3.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2005-12-13 16:13 EST ------- The latest SRPM (munin-1.2.4-2.fc5.src.rpm) builds in mock on FC-4 and installs without any problems. So, I don't think there are any blockers left here. Assuming that the licenses are all acceptable, I think it would be nice for munin to support all of its plug-ins (inc. both the Sybase interface and the SNMP bits). But they are, ultimately, just plug-ins -- not essential bits of functionality. And, being plug-ins, they can be readily enabled as soon as the necessary supporting packages are included in Fedora. So if the submitter agrees to work with others to help enable the plug-ins (that is, when the other packages are ready) then this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 21:15:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:15:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170905] Review Request: pcsc-tools In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512132115.jBDLFfX5010870@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pcsc-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170905 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-13 16:15 EST ------- Thanks, imported and successfully built for FC-4 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 21:47:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:47:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174278] Review Request: tcldom - XML DOM bindings for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512132147.jBDLl2Qp015816@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcldom - XML DOM bindings for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174278 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-13 16:46 EST ------- - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (BSD) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC4 i386 - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - devel requires base package n-v-r However, - Have you tested this on 64 bit? %{_libdir} may prove problematic - BuildRoot should be cleaned at the beginning of %install. - A bunch of compiler warnings, particularly in tcldomlibxml2.c. Be sure to tell upstream about this, and show them your patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 21:53:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:53:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171156] Review Request: spin - On-the-fly, LTL model checker In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512132153.jBDLrb7k017043@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spin - On-the-fly, LTL model checker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171156 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-13 16:53 EST ------- I very much agree... I have no clue about legal stuff ^^ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 21:54:05 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:54:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173040] Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512132154.jBDLs5Zx017234@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173040 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-12-13 16:53 EST ------- Please CC me on the new bug when you have a fuse-encfs package for me to review. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 22:07:19 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:07:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174497] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512132207.jBDM7JNP018593@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174497 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-13 17:07 EST ------- Thanks, imported and build :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 23:05:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:05:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166551] Review Request: synce-trayicon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512132305.jBDN5FgO025432@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-trayicon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166551 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-13 18:04 EST ------- I would add these two lines to the desktop file : GenericName=Tray icon for SynCE devices Icon=synce/synce-color-small.png To have a better description and a nice icon. Apart from that, packaging looks good and the application works Review for release 3: * RPM name is OK * Source synce-trayicon-0.9.0.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of synce-trayicon looks OK * File list of synce-trayicon looks OK * Works fine APPROVED Please apply the improvements to the desktop file before requesting a build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 23:29:56 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:29:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166551] Review Request: synce-trayicon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512132329.jBDNTuqt027904@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: synce-trayicon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166551 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-13 18:29 EST ------- imported, changed and build for fc5. THANKS as well for this one :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 23:32:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:32:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165955] Review Request: grads Grid Analysis and Display System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512132332.jBDNW2Th028109@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grads Grid Analysis and Display System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165955 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2005-12-13 18:31 EST ------- The previous srpm was certainly broken, or not what was intended. This one should be right (with minor enhancements, removal of the data source as it is in the tarball). http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/grads-1.9b4-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 13 23:43:54 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:43:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174278] Review Request: tcldom - XML DOM bindings for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512132343.jBDNhsmv029683@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcldom - XML DOM bindings for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174278 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2005-12-13 18:43 EST ------- My primary development machine is dual x86_64, and I haven't noticed any build or runtime problems with %{_libdir}. But I did notice a minor problem loading the pure-tcl dom library that has been fixed in an updated patch in this next package. BuildRoot is now cleaned at the beginning of %install All patches have been sent upstream, and I've notified the upstream developers about the compiler warnings. Upstream doesn't release new packages very often, so I don't expect to see them adopt the patches anytime soon. New spec file and src rpm: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tcldom.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tcldom-3.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 00:40:22 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:40:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175494] Review Request: new In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512140040.jBE0eMXO002592@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175494 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at flyn.org 2005-12-13 19:40 EST ------- Changes recommended by John: Spec Name or Url: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.flyn.org/projects/new/new-1.3.5-2.src.rpm Description: A simple template system for creating text files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 01:00:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:00:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175502] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Spell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512140100.jBE10ctk003961@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Spell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175502 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2005-12-13 20:00 EST ------- NOTE: I cannot sponsor, but here's a review. :) Good: - Package name is good. - License is good and matches upstream (LGPL) - Source is good and matches upstream - builds fine on fc4/devel. - package seems to work as expected using the include test perl script. Minor: - rpmlint warning: W: perl-Gtk2-Spell devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi/Gtk2/Spell/Install/gtk2spellperl.h - why bother to use the %realname macro? Is the package name expected to change very often? :) - why the 'echo n | ' in the build section? - Might include the Changelog file as a doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 01:10:53 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 20:10:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175495] Review Request: cgi-util In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512140110.jBE1ArIE004711@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cgi-util https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175495 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at flyn.org 2005-12-13 20:10 EST ------- The following version spilts out a devel package: Spec Name or Url: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/cgi-util.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/cgi-util-2.2.1-2.src.rpm Description: A C library for creating Common Gateway Interface ("CGI") programs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 02:58:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:58:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175144] Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512140258.jBE2wGB3013604@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175144 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2005-12-13 21:58 EST ------- Surely. It would be nice to have the SNMP plugins in particular, but munin is very useful without them. :) I would be happy to enable the plugins as soon as I can. Right now, that looks like two possibilities: - The license on perl-Crypt-DES is ok and it gets approved. Then, I can submit perl-Net-SNMP and re-enable those plugins when that gets approved. - I talked with upstream and they are fine with switching to net-snmp-perl, but would need patches to do so. I might have time over the holidays to look at that. Thanks for the approval. I will import and test on fc3/fc4 to see what branches should be requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 03:11:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:11:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512140311.jBE3B04E015165@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2005-12-13 22:10 EST ------- These should probably be taken to the openswan mailinglist, and not further discussed here. I have never seen hanging pppd's. rekey should be done by the client and works. openswan should be configured with rekey=no, because it cannot rekey a right=%any connection. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ivazquez at ivazquez.net Wed Dec 14 07:08:07 2005 From: ivazquez at ivazquez.net (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 02:08:07 -0500 Subject: sqlite in Extras (yes, again...) Message-ID: <1134544088.3672.14.camel@ignacio.lan> I hate to dredge up old topics, but bug #175607 wants sqlite 3 in FE3. Does anyone want to veto this at this time, or should I proceed to import FC4 sqlite 3 into FE3 after modifying the release appropriately? -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 08:10:04 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:10:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512140810.jBE8A4Yp010127@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-14 03:09 EST ------- * Wed Dec 14 2005 Enrico Scholz - 0.40-1.8 - moved smart-fedora-setup to %sbindir http://ensc.de/fedora/smart.spec http://ensc.de/fedora/smart-0.40-1.8.src.rpm ================== > > * -usermode adds non-trivial deps > Hmm, could you elaborate what these are? glib2, libattr, pam, > libselinux and libuser sound like things that are pretty hard to > get rid of in a functional FC setup. 'usermode' itself; I do not see much sense for 'libuser' on plain server machines neither and glib2 is a thorn in my side too None of my machines has SELinux enabled so I would have nothing against dropping the libselinux dep ;) > the versioned deps would help people who try to rebuild this for > earlier distro versions or RHEL. (Some kind of support for those is > sort of implied elsewhere in the package, eg. smart-fedora-setup.) mmh... I blindly copied the 'installonlypkgs' list from 'yum' into 'smart-fedora-setup'. It was never my intention to support earlier distro versions or RHEL... ;) > > I want to make sure that 'smart-gtk' gets installed after 'smart' > > and removed before it, because -gtk uses directories from the > > base package which would stay when 'smart' is removed before > > 'smart-gtk'. > Plain requires is fine for install time. And at install time it > wouldn't matter anyway as long as all dirs are owned. can you guarantee that there will not come a future package introducing a circular dependency between smart and smart-gtk? > > afaik, pre/postun modifiers are the only way *guaranting* that. > Even if postun may work with the erase ordering, I wouldn't count on > that abuse (adding a dependency for a %postun script which doesn't > exist). When you want to survive with rpm you have to do such abuse or hacks ;) > smart-fedora-setup doesn't appear to do anything useful when run as > non-root, maybe move it to /usr/sbin? done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 08:52:48 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 03:52:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173111] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512140852.jBE8qm7s014887@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173111 ------- Additional Comments From luya256 at yahoo.com 2005-12-14 03:52 EST ------- Updated specs and rebuild srpm. http://finalzone.webmasterswebworkshop.com/Fedora/gdesklets-0.35.2-22.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 09:12:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:12:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175630] Review Request: smart - Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512140912.jBE9C9jL016383@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart - Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175630 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-14 04:12 EST ------- response to comment @2 (referencing to bug #175631): > Why are the config files in a separate package? * upstream 'smart' does not ship channel lists ==> separate channels are no artifical package-split ==> adding channel lists to the 'smart' package would also add clutter * at least in bug #175631: 'smart-channels' are packaged noarch while 'smart' is arch-specific * yum makes this too (yum + fedora-release) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 09:35:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:35:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512140935.jBE9ZX8B018778@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-14 04:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > can you guarantee that there will not come a future package introducing > a circular dependency between smart and smart-gtk? Even if such a package would somehow appear, it would have to invoke something that requires both smart and smart-gtk in its %pre or %post scriptlets and manage to get itself inserted in a transaction before both of them are installed for it to matter at install time. Or are you thinking about some other scenario? Of course I cannot make any guarantees, but I do promise to fix the problem if it appears ;) To summarize my remaining wishlist and IMO's, I think I can be persuaded to let them pass but I'd like to hear feedback from other reviewers: - -usermode should be folded into the main package - add >= 4.4 versions to rpm-python and rpm-build dependencies - Requires(pre/postun) abuses should be pruned (at least the (pre) part) Comments on bug 175630 comment 2 (why separate package for channels) is also unaddressed so far, but I don't have strong opinions on that. Will start actually testing the package today :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 09:36:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:36:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512140936.jBE9aNkx018858@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-14 04:36 EST ------- Oh, I see you just commented on the separate channels package, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 09:58:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:58:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512140958.jBE9wdV7022199@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-14 04:58 EST ------- > hanging pppd's. Well, I'll try to figure out it myself. Paul, I'm a little confused with your silence about comment #13 remarks etc. The review process is iterative, therefore it is better to do changes step by step... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 10:13:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 05:13:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175630] Review Request: smart - Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512141013.jBEADf1t023810@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart - Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175630 Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ville.skytta at iki.fi, | |enrico.scholz at informatik.tu- | |chemnitz.de ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2005-12-14 05:13 EST ------- up2date, too. Fedora as a vendor and all the third party repos ship the config files in a separate package. This allows flexibility in the sense that you only update the config files package instead of rebuilding the whole thing. Local site admins can simply replace this package with a package containing local mirrors, distribution updates can be made by upgrading only the config files (as future yum/smart etc. will depend on future python, you break the chicken and egg situation). There are only reasons as far as to keep the config files in its own package. But I agree it should become part of fedora-release in the long term :) (seriously, if smart does meet its expectations it would be a good candidate to be promoted to Core someday. While already have duplicate functionality by yum and up2date, smart could have benfits. But that's not to discuss yet, let smart convince users in Extras first). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 10:22:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 05:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512141022.jBEAMk6j024665@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2005-12-14 05:22 EST ------- o I'd keep usermod in the main package. Reason is that end-users will not really know they want it, until they see it, and it doesn't cost much. o Keep versioned BuildRequires (but I think this should be >= 4.3) o pre/postun tricks to cure rpm oredring issues is an overkill. We'd have to do that for every package then, and it was meaning something else once. Better to attack this in rpm itself. I'd also like to address compatibilty to the given user base. Dag and ATrpms users have been using smart for over a year now, and therefore it would seem appropriate to properly obsolete/provide bits from there to ensure non-breakage of operation. (Hey, this would be the first package in cooperative mode :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 10:51:07 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 05:51:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512141051.jBEAp7Zm028603@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2005-12-14 05:50 EST ------- svn of today still segfaulting for me on x86_64 rawhide. if someone has the hardware and enough time it would be sweet to build up a custom kernel and attach gdb to initng. maybe i can find the time next week to provide the proper upstream debug info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 13:28:44 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 08:28:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512141328.jBEDSiXl014995@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-14 08:28 EST ------- does it segfault on boot or shutdown? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 14:53:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 09:53:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175276] Review Request: gift: daemon for communicating with filesharing protocols In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512141453.jBEErQwH025251@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gift: daemon for communicating with filesharing protocols https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175276 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-14 09:53 EST ------- It looks like you also have to add "--enable-libmagic" for libmagic to be picked up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Wed Dec 14 15:14:29 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:14:29 +0100 Subject: rpms/tinyerp/FC-3 tinyerp.spec,1.7,1.8 In-Reply-To: <200512141425.jBEEP0fB004041@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> References: <200512141425.jBEEP0fB004041@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1134573269.30243.73.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 09:24 -0500, Dan Horak wrote: > Index: tinyerp.spec > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/tinyerp/FC-3/tinyerp.spec,v > retrieving revision 1.7 > retrieving revision 1.8 > diff -u -r1.7 -r1.8 > --- tinyerp.spec 11 Dec 2005 12:18:39 -0000 1.7 > +++ tinyerp.spec 14 Dec 2005 14:24:27 -0000 1.8 > @@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ > > %pre server > /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd 13 -r tinyerp &>/dev/null || : > -/usr/sbin/fedora-useradd 13 -r -s /sbin/nologin -d /var/spool/tinyerp -M \ > +/usr/sbin/fedora-useradd 13 -r -s /bin/bash -d /var/spool/tinyerp -M \ > -c 'TinyERP Server Owner' -g tinyerp tinyerp &>/dev/null || : Urgh 1. Why /bin/bash? /bin/bash should _never_ be used for reserved accounts - It's a security risk. 2. You this %pre rule will have no effect if the user already exists. => This won't work. 3. Why fedora-useradd? * Use literal account name instead of numerical ones and a plain user-add probably will be sufficient. * IMO, fedora-usermgt is a design wart that should not be used anywhere. Ralf From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 15:20:20 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:20:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512141520.jBEFKKuS028209@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-14 10:19 EST ------- > o I'd keep usermod in the main package. Reason is that end-users will > not really know they want it, until they see it, and it doesn't cost > much. end-users who need such help are usually installing 'smart-gtk' which brings -usermod with it. users with the text interface only will probably prefer to execute 'smart' as root or through sudo. 'consolehelper' on CLI does not offer very much. I just checked all my vservers and none of them has 'usermode' installed. Because I do not trust Fedora Core package qualitity very much (who knows whether the next 'usermode' adds a perl- or mysql-dependency ;) ) I would prefer to reduce additional dependencies as far as possible. An additional package does not hurt, but additional deps do. > o pre/postun tricks to cure rpm oredring issues is an overkill. We'd > have to do that for every package then, I do this for my packages... ;) I gave up the 'Requires(pre): filesystem' some time ago ;) but I want to make sure that non-trivial and not-owned-by-me directories are in place before I put files into them. > I'd also like to address compatibilty to the given user base. Dag > and ATrpms users have been using smart for over a year now, and > therefore it would seem appropriate to properly obsolete/provide > bits from there to ensure non-breakage of operation. ok, I will check that -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de Wed Dec 14 16:00:26 2005 From: enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de (Enrico Scholz) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:00:26 +0100 Subject: rpms/tinyerp/FC-3 tinyerp.spec,1.7,1.8 In-Reply-To: <1134573269.30243.73.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> (Ralf Corsepius's message of "Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:14:29 +0100") References: <200512141425.jBEEP0fB004041@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <1134573269.30243.73.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <87acf3zn1h.fsf@kosh.bigo.ensc.de> rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) writes: >> %pre server >> /usr/sbin/fedora-groupadd 13 -r tinyerp &>/dev/null || : >> -/usr/sbin/fedora-useradd 13 -r -s /sbin/nologin -d /var/spool/tinyerp -M \ >> +/usr/sbin/fedora-useradd 13 -r -s /bin/bash -d /var/spool/tinyerp -M \ >> -c 'TinyERP Server Owner' -g tinyerp tinyerp &>/dev/null || : > > 2. You this %pre rule will have no effect if the user already exists. > => This won't work. I would say that this is intentionally. Deleting and recreating an existing user in %pre seems to be a bad idea. > 3. Why fedora-useradd? > > * Use literal account name instead of numerical ones and a plain > user-add probably will be sufficient. > * IMO, fedora-usermgt is a design wart that should not be used anywhere. ??? I create all my service users in this way and I am not aware of a a better way to create service-users with the same UID on every host. Enrico -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 480 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 16:07:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:07:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175748] New: Review Request: cacti Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175748 Summary: Review Request: cacti Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: mmcgrath at iesabroad.org QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Url: http://preview.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/cacti/cacti.spec SRPM Url: http://preview.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/cacti/cacti-0.8.6g-2.src.rpm Description: Cacti is a complete frontend to RRDTool. It stores all of the necessary information to create graphs and populate them with data in a MySQL database. The frontend is completely PHP driven. Along with being able to maintain graphs, data sources, and round robin archives in a database, Cacti also handles the data gathering. There is SNMP support for those used to creating traffic graphs with MRTG. Misc: This is my first package and I would like a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Wed Dec 14 16:35:19 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:35:19 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051214163519.E45AE8099@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 4 ipxripd-0.8-2.fc3 nmh-1.1-14.fc3 synce-software-manager-0.9.0-4.fc3 synce-trayicon-0.9.0-4.fc3 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Wed Dec 14 16:42:09 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:42:09 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051214164209.A62808001@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 15 gramps-2.0.9-1.fc4 inkscape-0.43-1.fc4 ipxripd-0.8-2.fc4 libopensync-plugin-evolution2-0.18-3.fc4 libopensync-plugin-file-0.18-3.fc4 libopensync-plugin-palm-0.18-2.fc4 libopensync-plugin-python-0.18-3.fc4 munin-1.2.4-2.fc4 nmh-1.1-14.fc4 pcsc-tools-1.4.1-1.fc4 perl-IPC-Shareable-0.60-1.fc4 perl-Set-IntSpan-1.09-1.fc4 synce-gnomevfs-0.9.0-2.fc4 synce-software-manager-0.9.0-4.fc4 synce-trayicon-0.9.0-4.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From wtogami at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 16:43:18 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:43:18 -0500 Subject: sqlite in Extras (yes, again...) In-Reply-To: <1134544088.3672.14.camel@ignacio.lan> References: <1134544088.3672.14.camel@ignacio.lan> Message-ID: <43A04BA6.40005@redhat.com> Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > I hate to dredge up old topics, but bug #175607 wants sqlite 3 in FE3. > Does anyone want to veto this at this time, or should I proceed to > import FC4 sqlite 3 into FE3 after modifying the release appropriately? With FC3 soon going to Legacy, we are considering slowing down the addition of new stuff to FE3 because of concern that maintenance will lapse. My opinion is that you should only add things to FE3 if you are willing to maintain it until that distribution is retired in Legacy. This is currently an indeterminate length of time, as the proposed length is when interest in that distro falls to a point where the community is not able to keep it secure anymore. So go ahead if you're confident in your ability to keep it updated in the future. Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Wed Dec 14 16:52:17 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 11:52:17 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051214165217.323AD809A@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 21 OpenSceneGraph-1.0-1.fc5 abcde-2.3.99.2-1.fc5 baobab-2.2.2-1.fc5 digikam-0.8.0-11.fc5 gnumeric-1.6.1-2 gramps-2.0.9-2.fc5 ircd-hybrid-7.2.0-4.fc5 krusader-1.60.1-3.fc5 libopensync-plugin-python-0.18-3.fc5 munin-1.2.4-2.fc5 nmh-1.1-14.fc5 nsd-2.3.3-5.fc5 pcsc-tools-1.4.1-1.fc5 perl-IPC-Shareable-0.60-1.fc5 perl-Readonly-XS-1.04-3.fc5 perl-Set-IntSpan-1.09-1.fc5 python-quixote-2.4-1.fc5 sobby-0.3.0-1.rc3.fc5 synce-software-manager-0.9.0-4.fc5 synce-trayicon-0.9.0-4.fc5 tla-1.3.3-3.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From rc040203 at freenet.de Wed Dec 14 16:40:42 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:40:42 +0100 Subject: rpms/tinyerp/FC-3 tinyerp.spec,1.7,1.8 In-Reply-To: <87acf3zn1h.fsf@kosh.bigo.ensc.de> References: <200512141425.jBEEP0fB004041@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <1134573269.30243.73.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <87acf3zn1h.fsf@kosh.bigo.ensc.de> Message-ID: <1134578443.30243.89.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 17:00 +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote: > rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) writes: > > 3. Why fedora-useradd? Did somebody analyze if tinyerp needs fedora-usrmgt at all? Most well designed server (!) software doesn't need fixed uid's nor any network-wide shared uids. > > * Use literal account name instead of numerical ones and a plain > > user-add probably will be sufficient. > > * IMO, fedora-usermgt is a design wart that should not be used anywhere. > > ??? I create all my service users in this way and I am not aware of a a > better way to create service-users with the same UID on every host. Read what you wrote: "... ALL MY ... USERS ..." It only works because you are using fedora-usrmgt everywhere, comprising non-fedora machines in your network. It won't work: - If you don't have control over ALL machines (E.g. because a work-group in your network doesn't grant you admin-rights on a subset of machines). - If you don't use fedora-usrmgt on ALL machines (E.g. because it can't be installed there, for some reasons ever). - if another similar tool is installed on machines in your network (say a "suse-usrmgt" or "sun-usrmgt" on SuSE or Suns in your network.) All in all, fedora-usgmgt only works out of the box in homogenious Fedora networks, or in networks which have been customized to meet fedora-usrmgt's demands. I.e. fedora-usrmgt's has an infective nature - To me, this is a fundamental design flaw, which questions it as a whole. Ralf From orion at cora.nwra.com Wed Dec 14 17:30:02 2005 From: orion at cora.nwra.com (Orion Poplawski) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:30:02 -0700 Subject: FE3 maintenance In-Reply-To: <43A04BA6.40005@redhat.com> References: <1134544088.3672.14.camel@ignacio.lan> <43A04BA6.40005@redhat.com> Message-ID: <43A0569A.4010003@cora.nwra.com> Warren Togami wrote: > > With FC3 soon going to Legacy, we are considering slowing down the > addition of new stuff to FE3 because of concern that maintenance will > lapse. My opinion is that you should only add things to FE3 if you are > willing to maintain it until that distribution is retired in Legacy. > This is currently an indeterminate length of time, as the proposed > length is when interest in that distro falls to a point where the > community is not able to keep it secure anymore. Is there a stated policy for existing FE3 packages as FC3 goes to Legacy? Does FE3 go to Legacy too? Are FE folks expected to maintain? -- Orion Poplawski System Administrator 303-415-9701 x222 Colorado Research Associates/NWRA FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane, Boulder CO 80301 http://www.co-ra.com From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de Wed Dec 14 17:31:22 2005 From: enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de (Enrico Scholz) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:31:22 +0100 Subject: rpms/tinyerp/FC-3 tinyerp.spec,1.7,1.8 In-Reply-To: <1134578443.30243.89.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> (Ralf Corsepius's message of "Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:40:42 +0100") References: <200512141425.jBEEP0fB004041@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <1134573269.30243.73.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <87acf3zn1h.fsf@kosh.bigo.ensc.de> <1134578443.30243.89.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <8764przitx.fsf@kosh.bigo.ensc.de> rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) writes: >> > 3. Why fedora-useradd? > > Did somebody analyze if tinyerp needs fedora-usrmgt at all? I think it needs it (it has a persistent /var/spool directory). fedora-usermgmt is very lightweighted and does not cost very much (e.g. no perl dep) so it is not a problem. > Most well designed server (!) software doesn't need fixed uid's nor > any network-wide shared uids. ??? Much servers are using UNIX sockets and UIDs/GIDs are a very effective method to make them sure. When two servers (e.g. in chroots) are sharing the same socket I want that they have the same view about ownership. Else, I suggest to read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDynamicUserCreationConsideredBad >> > * Use literal account name instead of numerical ones and a plain >> > user-add probably will be sufficient. >> > * IMO, fedora-usermgt is a design wart that should not be used anywhere. >> >> ??? I create all my service users in this way and I am not aware of a a >> better way to create service-users with the same UID on every host. > Read what you wrote: "... ALL MY ... USERS ..." > > It only works because you are using fedora-usrmgt everywhere, comprising > non-fedora machines in your network. And? Every thing has a beginning. It is difficultly to persuade Fedora people, and I had no time yet to start with non-fedora ones ;) > It won't work: > - If you don't have control over ALL machines (E.g. because a work-group > in your network doesn't grant you admin-rights on a subset of > machines). When I do not have admin-rights there, why should I try to add new users? > - if another similar tool is installed on machines in your network (say > a "suse-usrmgt" or "sun-usrmgt" on SuSE or Suns in your network.) fedora-usermgmt is not very fedora specific; it works probably out-of-the box on SuSE machines, the SUN version will perhaps need removal of some bash'isms. > I.e. fedora-usrmgt's has an infective nature - To me, this is a > fundamental design flaw, which questions it as a whole. Please not this infective ... crap. When you do not want it, then do not use GPLed software. Enrico -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 480 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 17:36:48 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:36:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512141736.jBEHammE017490@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-14 12:36 EST ------- > > hanging pppd's. > Well, I'll try to figure out it myself. Unfortunately, this bug has not repeatability. Today it happened only once (in more than 20 various attempts). I hope this bug will disappear after system upgrade to FC5 (from the current FC3 :)). Anyway, it is not a blocker for the review. > /etc/ppp/chap-secrets.example I've closely looked at contents of this file and have not found anything specifically related to l2tpd. It seems just an example for the ordinary PPP's chap-secrets file. As /etc/ppp/chap-secrets is "owned" by the "ppp" package, only the "ppp" package "decides" whether to include some examples for this file into /etc/ppp or not. Currently, "ppp" has decided to not include it. Let it be such. > listen-address As we cannot set this address to localhost, some another solution should be found. With the default /etc/l2tpd/l2tpd.conf, at each connection attempt the child "pppd" process will be invoked (and then probably exited due to auth failure). It is not a good "secure" default configuration. Perhaps specifying "challenge = yes" with the empty l2tp=secrets can solve this problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From paul at cypherpunks.ca Wed Dec 14 18:25:03 2005 From: paul at cypherpunks.ca (Paul Wouters) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:25:03 +0100 (CET) Subject: broadcom 802.11g driver for ppc Message-ID: broadcom 802.11g reverse engineered: http://www.linuxelectrons.com/article.php/20051205195525114 gpl linux driver: http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/ Is anyone working on adding this to the ppc tree? (maybe in Core?) Or else I could package this up. Would there be any legal issues including this kernel module? Paul -- "Happiness is never grand" --- Mustapha Mond, World Controller (Brave New World) From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de Wed Dec 14 18:22:00 2005 From: enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de (Enrico Scholz) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:22:00 +0100 Subject: rpms/tinyerp/FC-3 tinyerp.spec,1.7,1.8 In-Reply-To: <1134578443.30243.89.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> (Ralf Corsepius's message of "Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:40:42 +0100") References: <200512141425.jBEEP0fB004041@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <1134573269.30243.73.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <87acf3zn1h.fsf@kosh.bigo.ensc.de> <1134578443.30243.89.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <871x0fzghj.fsf@kosh.bigo.ensc.de> rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) writes: >> ??? I create all my service users in this way and I am not aware of a >> a better way to create service-users with the same UID on every host. > Read what you wrote: "... ALL MY ... USERS ..." I forgot: fedora-usermgmt coexists nicely with the "traditional" kind of user-management. Without explicit configuration it behaves exactly like the traditional user-management (and 0.8 will workaround caching bugs in nscd). But fedora-usermgmt *allows* to influence user-creation so that it meets your requirements; which is not possible with the traditional way. Enrico -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 480 bytes Desc: not available URL: From davej at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 18:25:11 2005 From: davej at redhat.com (Dave Jones) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:25:11 -0500 Subject: broadcom 802.11g driver for ppc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20051214182511.GC8474@redhat.com> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 07:25:03PM +0100, Paul Wouters wrote: > gpl linux driver: > http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/ > > Is anyone working on adding this to the ppc tree? (maybe in Core?) The authors have requested that distros don't package it for the time being, for the same reason it isn't upstream yet, it's very unstable, and lacks many features (iirc, it can only do 'G', no A or B yet) > Or else I could package this up. > > Would there be any legal issues including this kernel module? It's been cleanroom reverse engineered, so there shouldn't be. Dave From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 18:27:01 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:27:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175502] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Spell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512141827.jBEIR15q026801@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Gtk2-Spell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175502 ------- Additional Comments From cweyl at alumni.drew.edu 2005-12-14 13:26 EST ------- Updated spec/srpm: Spec Name or Url: http://www.mindspring.com/~cweyl/perl-Gtk2-Spell/perl-Gtk2-Spell.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.mindspring.com/~cweyl/perl-Gtk2-Spell/perl-Gtk2-Spell-1.03-2.ckw.fc4.src.rpm %realname is used as I was creating a bunch of module rpms for my own use; this macro allowed me to quickly take a template spec file and cusomize it. Minor issues addressed: - 'echo n |' in %build nixed. - ChangeLog included as a doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 19:08:13 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:08:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512141908.jBEJ8DTh032020@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2005-12-14 14:08 EST ------- Sorry, I missed those comments. I've incorporated all changes proposed in l2tpd.init (white space issues) I've incorporated most of the changes proposed in l2tpd.spec. I did not add the chkconfig -add call, since I was told one shouldn't start a service upon install. Where should I move the chap-secrets.sample to? /etc/l2tpd/ or /usr/share/doc/l2tpd ? I don't want to start using l2tp challange or l2tp-secrets files, because when used with ipsec (100% of l2tp usage AFAIK) these files are no used. I guess we can do 127.0.0.1 but I will need to add a comment to it that this is made clear to be the internal ip of the gateway. I have put up new rpms and the spec file, incorporating all but this last change. ftp://ftp.openswan.org/l2tpd/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/l2tpd.spec ftp://ftp.openswan.org/l2tpd/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/l2tpd-0.69-0.1.20051030.src.rpm As for your l2tpd/ppp problems, please give me a log of the l2tpd -D output, and if possible an 'ipsec barf' output. (though I think this should move out of this bugzilla item and perhaps move to the openswan-users mailinglist). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 19:38:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:38:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175144] Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512141938.jBEJcb8q005246@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: munin - Network-wide graphing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175144 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2005-12-14 14:38 EST ------- imported and built on fc3/fc4/devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From wtogami at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 20:44:13 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:44:13 -0500 Subject: broadcom 802.11g driver for ppc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43A0841D.5060906@redhat.com> Paul Wouters wrote: > broadcom 802.11g reverse engineered: > > http://www.linuxelectrons.com/article.php/20051205195525114 > > gpl linux driver: > > http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/ > > Is anyone working on adding this to the ppc tree? (maybe in Core?) > > Or else I could package this up. > > Would there be any legal issues including this kernel module? > > Paul It would be best to get the driver into the upstream kernel, then Fedora can easily have it. But it is likely not to happen until the driver is much more mature. Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com From wtogami at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 20:44:55 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:44:55 -0500 Subject: FE3 maintenance In-Reply-To: <43A0569A.4010003@cora.nwra.com> References: <1134544088.3672.14.camel@ignacio.lan> <43A04BA6.40005@redhat.com> <43A0569A.4010003@cora.nwra.com> Message-ID: <43A08447.2010704@redhat.com> Orion Poplawski wrote: > Warren Togami wrote: >> With FC3 soon going to Legacy, we are considering slowing down the >> addition of new stuff to FE3 because of concern that maintenance will >> lapse. My opinion is that you should only add things to FE3 if you are >> willing to maintain it until that distribution is retired in Legacy. >> This is currently an indeterminate length of time, as the proposed >> length is when interest in that distro falls to a point where the >> community is not able to keep it secure anymore. > > Is there a stated policy for existing FE3 packages as FC3 goes to > Legacy? Does FE3 go to Legacy too? Are FE folks expected to maintain? > FE will continue to remain the responsibility of Extras package maintainers, and FL will not be expected to maintain FE. I personally think it would be counter-productive to close new package acceptance into FE3 at this time, but we may want to look into this in the future. We're still thinking about what exactly will happen. Your opinions on this matter are welcome though. Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 21:02:22 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:02:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512142102.jBEL2MY9018763@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-14 16:02 EST ------- %post of the main package still calls /usr/bin/smart-fedora-setup (wrong path) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From mpeters at mac.com Wed Dec 14 22:03:27 2005 From: mpeters at mac.com (Michael A. Peters) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:03:27 -0800 Subject: broadcom 802.11g driver for ppc In-Reply-To: <43A0841D.5060906@redhat.com> References: <43A0841D.5060906@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1134597807.2776.41.camel@locolhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 15:44 -0500, Warren Togami wrote: > Paul Wouters wrote: > > broadcom 802.11g reverse engineered: > > > > http://www.linuxelectrons.com/article.php/20051205195525114 > > > > gpl linux driver: > > > > http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/ > > > > Is anyone working on adding this to the ppc tree? (maybe in Core?) > > > > Or else I could package this up. > > > > Would there be any legal issues including this kernel module? > > > > Paul > > It would be best to get the driver into the upstream kernel, then Fedora > can easily have it. But it is likely not to happen until the driver is > much more mature. If this module does what I think it does - it would be extremely beneficial to the ppc community because it would allow them to use the Airport Extreme cards that Apple ships in their hardware. I heard someone (Ville Skytt? ??) mention that at some point, support for kernel modules in Extras will appear - if it doesn't get into upstream kernel, it then would (imho) be beneficial to the MacLinux community. I think my Dad's Dell also uses a built-in broadcom chip (not positive) - x86 users might like it too, it is a fairly common chip. madwifi has been an awesome addition to rpm.livna.org for me, I'm very grateful to have it - I bet ppc users would similarly appreciate an Airport Extreme driver in Extras or Livna if it is not ready for main kernel (assuming it works well enough that it isn't frustrating to use) Of course if it is too alpha to work well, that's a different story ... From mpeters at mac.com Wed Dec 14 22:05:41 2005 From: mpeters at mac.com (Michael A. Peters) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:05:41 -0800 Subject: mock in FC5 Message-ID: <1134597942.2776.45.camel@locolhost.localdomain> Stopped working for me in devel. I can post the actual error later, but if this is a known thing - is there a fix? It dies out with a Python error (something about an attribute error with YumConf) From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 14 22:47:22 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:47:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173040] Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512142247.jBEMlMqv003336@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173040 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at newmail.ru 2005-12-14 17:47 EST ------- (In reply to comment #16) > OK APPRPROVED, and I am sponsoring you now. Thanks! Added to CVS. > Please CC me on the new bug when you have a > fuse-encfs package for me to review. OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 15 00:39:10 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:39:10 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051215003910.472AE8001@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 10 SDL_ttf-2.0.7-3.fc5 gnomesword-2.1.5-1.fc5 gramps-2.0.9-3.fc5 lirc-0.8.0-0.2.pre2.fc5 munin-1.2.4-3.fc5 perl-MailTools-1.67-2.fc5 rlog-1.3.7-1.fc5 sword-1.5.8-6.fc5 xchat-gnome-0.7-4.fc5 xscorch-0.2.0-5.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From dcbw at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 01:05:17 2005 From: dcbw at redhat.com (Dan Williams) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:05:17 -0500 Subject: mock in FC5 In-Reply-To: <1134597942.2776.45.camel@locolhost.localdomain> References: <1134597942.2776.45.camel@locolhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1134608718.2761.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 14:05 -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote: > Stopped working for me in devel. > > I can post the actual error later, but if this is a known thing - is > there a fix? It dies out with a Python error (something about an > attribute error with YumConf) Yeah, that was reported earlier this week. I think Jeremy termed it a "gratuitous API change" or something :) In any case, it doesn't hurt to bug Seth. Dan From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 01:39:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:39:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169731] Review Request: ecl - Embeddable Common-Lisp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512150139.jBF1dTEu022263@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecl - Embeddable Common-Lisp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169731 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-14 20:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I am not sure it makes much sense to split off a devel package. > Ecl can be considered a development package in itself (we took > this view for clisp for example). > IF a devel is split off, then we must decide what belongs to it > (apart from the .h files). I notice a clisp-devel package, for what it's worth. install.html is not needed, do not include. also, xorg-x11-devel BuildRequires is unneeded. Missing m4 and texinfo as per comment 1. Let's get this to build first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 02:38:51 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:38:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173543] Review Request: xfce4-datetime-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512150238.jBF2cpLc028802@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-datetime-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173543 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-14 21:38 EST ------- Thanks for the review Kevin. Package has built successfully on all arches & branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 02:40:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174278] Review Request: tcldom - XML DOM bindings for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512150240.jBF2ex97028978@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcldom - XML DOM bindings for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174278 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-14 21:40 EST ------- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 02:47:45 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:47:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173658] Review Request: xfce4-cpugraph-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512150247.jBF2ljaf029669@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-cpugraph-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173658 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-14 21:47 EST ------- Hi Ed, thanks for your work. Package build successfully on all arches and braches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 02:51:36 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:51:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173671] Review Request: xfce4-weather-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512150251.jBF2pauX030251@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-weather-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173671 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-14 21:51 EST ------- Thank you very much for your work on my packages. xfce-weather-plugin has build successfully on all arches & branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 02:51:57 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:51:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173672] Review Request: xfce4-windowlist-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512150251.jBF2pv6I030361@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-windowlist-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173672 Bug 173672 depends on bug 173671, which changed state. Bug 173671 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-weather-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173671 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 02:54:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:54:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173672] Review Request: xfce4-windowlist-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512150254.jBF2s8Xn030630@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-windowlist-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173672 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-14 21:53 EST ------- Thanks. Package has build fine on all arches & branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 04:04:13 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:04:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173035] Review Request: chmlib - Library for dealing with ITSS/CHM format files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512150404.jBF44DpD010608@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chmlib - Library for dealing with ITSS/CHM format files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173035 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-14 23:04 EST ------- A couple warnings you want to tell upstream about, like "warning: "memcpy" redefined" - rpmlint's happy except for some no-documentation from the devel package - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (LGPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC4 i386 - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r One change, the BuildRoot needs to be cleaned at the beginning of %install, like %clean. Do this and this is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 04:24:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:24:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173670] Review Request: xfce4-wavelan-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512150424.jBF4ONCG013829@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-wavelan-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173670 ed at eh3.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |ed at eh3.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2005-12-14 23:24 EST ------- Hi Christoph, heres a review: good: + name OK + source matches upstream + clean, simple, and legible specfile + license is correct (BSD) and included (good) + builds in mock on FC-4 + no rpmlint errors or warnings + dir ownership is OK + installs and works without segfaults on FC-4 This package is very simple and I don't see anything the matter with it so its APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 04:28:40 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:28:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175799] New: Review Request: tor - nonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175799 Summary: Review Request: tor - nonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: paul at xtdnet.nl QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/tor/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/tor.spec SRPM Name or Url: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/tor/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/tor-0.1.0.15-1.src.rpm Note: I was asked by the tor developers (Roger et al.) if I would like to maintain this package for FE. Description: Tor is a connection-based low-latency anonymous communication system. This package provides the "tor" program, which serves as both a client and a relay node. Scripts will automatically create a "_tor" user and group, and set tor up to run as a daemon when the system is rebooted. Applications connect to the local Tor proxy using the SOCKS protocol. The local proxy chooses a path through a set of relays, in which each relay knows its predecessor and successor, but no others. Traffic flowing down the circuit is unwrapped by a symmetric key at each relay, which reveals the downstream relay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 06:00:45 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174325] Review Request: mod_spin Apache module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512150600.jBF60ja0023274@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_spin Apache module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174325 ------- Additional Comments From bojan at rexursive.com 2005-12-15 01:00 EST ------- The upcoming mod_spin 1.1.1 (I'm planning to release it when this review is over, with all the suggestions incorporated) builds fine on my Rawhide system against Apache 2.2.0 and libapreq2 RPMS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 06:49:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:49:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512150649.jBF6nfQd027037@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-15 01:49 EST ------- * Wed Dec 14 2005 Enrico Scholz - 0.1.0.15-1.1 - added -minit subpackage http://ensc.de/fedora/tor.spec http://ensc.de/fedora/tor-0.1.0.15-1.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 06:54:47 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:54:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512150654.jBF6sl7l027442@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-15 01:54 EST ------- * Thu Dec 15 2005 Enrico Scholz - 0.40-1.9 - fixed path of smart-fedora-setup in %%post http://ensc.de/fedora/smart.spec http://ensc.de/fedora/smart-0.40-1.9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 09:19:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:19:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174495] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-kdepim In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512150919.jBF9J9nU011508@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopensync-plugin-kdepim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174495 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-15 04:19 EST ------- sure... but then I will bug upstream with it ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 09:22:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 04:22:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174240] Review Request: artwiz-aleczapka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512150922.jBF9MZHs011804@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: artwiz-aleczapka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174240 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-15 04:22 EST ------- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 11:38:36 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 06:38:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175605] Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512151138.jBFBcaqu032162@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175605 ------- Additional Comments From lmb at biosci.ki.se 2005-12-15 06:38 EST ------- Forgot to mention that this is my first package and that I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Thu Dec 15 11:54:40 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:54:40 +0100 Subject: rpms/tinyerp/FC-3 tinyerp.spec,1.7,1.8 In-Reply-To: <8764przitx.fsf@kosh.bigo.ensc.de> References: <200512141425.jBEEP0fB004041@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <1134573269.30243.73.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <87acf3zn1h.fsf@kosh.bigo.ensc.de> <1134578443.30243.89.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <8764przitx.fsf@kosh.bigo.ensc.de> Message-ID: <1134647680.30243.126.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 18:31 +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote: > rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) writes: > > It only works because you are using fedora-usrmgt everywhere, comprising > > non-fedora machines in your network. > > And? Every thing has a beginning. It is difficultly to persuade Fedora > people, and I had no time yet to start with non-fedora ones ;) Woa! That's nothing but Fedora arrogance and ignorance wrt. portability. Face it: Fedora-usrmgt is an isolated Fedora proprietary solution - not any better or worse than any other proprietary SW, be it from M$ or whom else. It is GPL'ed, so anybody is free to use it, but unlike on Fedora system, you are not in a position to force them to use it. > > It won't work: > > - If you don't have control over ALL machines (E.g. because a work-group > > in your network doesn't grant you admin-rights on a subset of > > machines). > > When I do not have admin-rights there, why should I try to add new > users? Because a "Requires: fedora-usrmgt" inside of fedora packages forces other machines in a network to adopt fedora-usrmgt rsp. it's internal working principles/strategies. This doesn't work, because in larger networks, admins use different strategies and tools to administrate uids/groups etc. you don't have the slightest chance to know about. Fedora-usrmgt presumes a networking one strategy, but ... in a network, Fedora is not alone, so any assumptions you want to impose are and will inevitably be wrong. > > - if another similar tool is installed on machines in your network (say > > a "suse-usrmgt" or "sun-usrmgt" on SuSE or Suns in your network.) > > fedora-usermgmt is not very fedora specific; it works probably out-of-the > box on SuSE machines, the SUN version will perhaps need removal of some > bash'isms. That's not the problem. The problem is: The fact FE uses fedora-usrmgt as hard-coded unconditional requirements forces everybody on a network to use it rsp. to adopt it. > > I.e. fedora-usrmgt's has an infective nature - To me, this is a > > fundamental design flaw, which questions it as a whole. > > Please not this infective ... crap. When you do not want it, then do not > use GPLed software. BS - What has licensing to do with FE containing hard-coded dependencies on a package which causes one fedora machine in network to infect other machines on the network? In case I still have not been clear enough: There is no problem with fedora-usrmgt as a stand-alone package/tool. The problem is using it inside of rpms and having dependencies on fedora-usrmgt inside of rpms. Ralf From oliver at linux-kernel.at Thu Dec 15 12:46:14 2005 From: oliver at linux-kernel.at (Oliver Falk) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:46:14 +0100 Subject: Extras repo cleanup Message-ID: <43A16596.1000409@linux-kernel.at> Hi! FYI. The current extras development directory is 3630 MB big at my mirror. Checking with repomanage, makes me see, that we could safe 1516 MB if we would delete old RPMs... Best, Oliver From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de Thu Dec 15 12:49:14 2005 From: enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de (Enrico Scholz) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:49:14 +0100 Subject: rpms/tinyerp/FC-3 tinyerp.spec,1.7,1.8 In-Reply-To: <1134647680.30243.126.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> (Ralf Corsepius's message of "Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:54:40 +0100") References: <200512141425.jBEEP0fB004041@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <1134573269.30243.73.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <87acf3zn1h.fsf@kosh.bigo.ensc.de> <1134578443.30243.89.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <8764przitx.fsf@kosh.bigo.ensc.de> <1134647680.30243.126.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <878xumfrud.fsf@kosh.bigo.ensc.de> rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) writes: >> > - If you don't have control over ALL machines (E.g. because a work-group >> > in your network doesn't grant you admin-rights on a subset of >> > machines). >> >> When I do not have admin-rights there, why should I try to add new >> users? > Because a "Requires: fedora-usrmgt" inside of fedora packages forces > other machines in a network to adopt fedora-usrmgt rsp. it's internal > working principles/strategies. Completely wrong. fedora-usermgmt behaves like a traditional useradd by default. You do not have to configure something for that, nor do you need to turn off something, nor do you need to learn something about it. >> fedora-usermgmt is not very fedora specific; it works probably out-of-the >> box on SuSE machines, the SUN version will perhaps need removal of some >> bash'isms. > That's not the problem. > > The problem is: The fact FE uses fedora-usrmgt as hard-coded > unconditional requirements forces everybody on a network to use it rsp. > to adopt it. See above: nobody forces you to use it. fedora-usermgmt + traditional useradd coexist perfectly by default. > In case I still have not been clear enough: There is no problem with > fedora-usrmgt as a stand-alone package/tool. The problem is using it > inside of rpms and having dependencies on fedora-usrmgt inside of rpms. afaik, it is completely ok when Fedora Extra packages depend on other Fedora Extra packages. Enrico From mattdm at mattdm.org Thu Dec 15 12:55:25 2005 From: mattdm at mattdm.org (Matthew Miller) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 07:55:25 -0500 Subject: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras Development In-Reply-To: <20051215122950.E0A761901B5@jadzia.bu.edu> References: <20051215122950.E0A761901B5@jadzia.bu.edu> Message-ID: <20051215125525.GA21421@jadzia.bu.edu> On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:29:50AM -0500, Michael Schwendt wrote: > This is an automated mail. > Your following packages in the repository have broken dependencies: > package: wxGTK-xrc - 2.4.2-12.i386 from fedora-extras-development-i386 > unresolved deps: > wxGTK = 0:2.4.2-12 wxGTK 2.6.2 has Obsoletes: wxGTK-xrc < 2.6.2-1 and Provides: wxGTK-xrc = %{version}-%{release} Hmmm. Looks like the base "wxGTK-2.4.2-12.i386.rpm" has gone missing from the repository, but some other parts of wxGTK-2.4.2 linger. How do I clean that up? -- Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org Boston University Linux ------> From fedora at leemhuis.info Thu Dec 15 13:12:17 2005 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:12:17 +0100 Subject: Extras repo cleanup In-Reply-To: <43A16596.1000409@linux-kernel.at> References: <43A16596.1000409@linux-kernel.at> Message-ID: <1134652337.10939.16.camel@thl.ct.heise.de> Am Donnerstag, den 15.12.2005, 13:46 +0100 schrieb Oliver Falk: > FYI. > > The current extras development directory is 3630 MB big at my mirror. > Checking with repomanage, makes me see, that we could safe 1516 MB if we > would delete old RPMs... I agree that removing old RPMS in the devel repo is a good idea. But not in the extras repos for FC[34] -- there one older version should be kept (that's the way it is handled right now). I put this on my to-discuss-list for the Fesco-Meeting today. CU thlk From fedora at camperquake.de Thu Dec 15 13:14:02 2005 From: fedora at camperquake.de (Ralf Ertzinger) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:14:02 +0100 Subject: Extras repo cleanup In-Reply-To: <1134652337.10939.16.camel@thl.ct.heise.de> References: <43A16596.1000409@linux-kernel.at> <1134652337.10939.16.camel@thl.ct.heise.de> Message-ID: <20051215131402.GB12468@ryoko.camperquake.de> On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 02:12:17PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > I agree that removing old RPMS in the devel repo is a good idea. But not > in the extras repos for FC[34] -- there one older version should be kept > (that's the way it is handled right now). I think that having an older version to fall back on is especially useful in the devel tree, where things are more likely to break. From ville.skytta at iki.fi Thu Dec 15 13:22:41 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:22:41 +0200 Subject: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras Development In-Reply-To: <20051215125525.GA21421@jadzia.bu.edu> References: <20051215122950.E0A761901B5@jadzia.bu.edu> <20051215125525.GA21421@jadzia.bu.edu> Message-ID: <1134652961.6888.9.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 07:55 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > Hmmm. Looks like the base "wxGTK-2.4.2-12.i386.rpm" has gone missing from > the repository, but some other parts of wxGTK-2.4.2 linger. How do I clean > that up? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/FC5Status From oliver at linux-kernel.at Thu Dec 15 13:23:18 2005 From: oliver at linux-kernel.at (Oliver Falk) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:23:18 +0100 Subject: Extras repo cleanup In-Reply-To: <20051215131402.GB12468@ryoko.camperquake.de> References: <43A16596.1000409@linux-kernel.at> <1134652337.10939.16.camel@thl.ct.heise.de> <20051215131402.GB12468@ryoko.camperquake.de> Message-ID: <43A16E46.2070409@linux-kernel.at> On 12/15/2005 02:14 PM, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 02:12:17PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > >> I agree that removing old RPMS in the devel repo is a good idea. But not >> in the extras repos for FC[34] -- there one older version should be kept >> (that's the way it is handled right now). > > I think that having an older version to fall back on is especially useful > in the devel tree, where things are more likely to break. Maybe we should put those into an seperate directory!? I'm wondering that core/devel and core/fc4 is clean - no old pkgs (where it would be needed much more than in extras); But in extras/devel and extras/fc4 we keep older pkgs. However, I would suggest fedora/extras/4 fedora/extras/4_old fedora/extras/development fedora/extras/development_old or something like that!? Best, Oliver From fedora at leemhuis.info Thu Dec 15 13:33:21 2005 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:33:21 +0100 Subject: Extras repo cleanup In-Reply-To: <43A16E46.2070409@linux-kernel.at> References: <43A16596.1000409@linux-kernel.at> <1134652337.10939.16.camel@thl.ct.heise.de> <20051215131402.GB12468@ryoko.camperquake.de> <43A16E46.2070409@linux-kernel.at> Message-ID: <1134653601.10939.31.camel@thl.ct.heise.de> Am Donnerstag, den 15.12.2005, 14:23 +0100 schrieb Oliver Falk: > On 12/15/2005 02:14 PM, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 02:12:17PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > >> I agree that removing old RPMS in the devel repo is a good idea. But not > >> in the extras repos for FC[34] -- there one older version should be kept > >> (that's the way it is handled right now). > > > > I think that having an older version to fall back on is especially useful > > in the devel tree, where things are more likely to break. > > I'm wondering that core/devel and core/fc4 is clean - no old pkgs (where > it would be needed much more than in extras); Yes, that was the reason why I suggested it. I also fear that people just install old versions and forget to file bug-reports if they have problems with a new package. > But in extras/devel and > extras/fc4 we keep older pkgs. In updates for core sometimes, too. CU thl From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 14:00:19 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:00:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512151400.jBFE0JTm017560@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-15 09:00 EST ------- Well. - rm -f %{buildroot} must be at the beginning of %install section too. > I did not add the chkconfig -add call, since I was told one shouldn't start a > service upon install. Here is some misunderstanding. When we say "shouldn't start a service upon install", it means we should not do "chkconfig l2tpd on" and "service l2tpd start" . But we must "chkconfig --add l2tpd"! See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-55b46ef483e6a08c24a8fc3b0b7e2ef7bfb84efd , for this. As l2tpd.init has "chkconfig: - 80 30", the "-" means that this service will be "off" after install (try "chkconfig l2tpd --list" to make sure of it). So, don't worry about it. For this package, all the recommendations according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#head-24ef9d59bda6032df14cf3cb433ce4ef09348f69 are acceptable. Also, don't check .pid file at %preun etc., IMO it is not needed (l2tpd.init works fine without this workaround), and it is not recommended way. Nitpicks: - defattr should be "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" (with the last ",-"). - l2tpd-chapsecrets.sample has 0600 permissions, which cause rpmlint to be confused a little on the source rpm. As you explicitly "install -m600" this file, too restrictive permissions of the source are not needed. I still suggest to get rid of chap-secrets.example at all. If you consider it is needed, then just move it to %doc - I would prefer to use "make" instead of "%{__make}", IMHO the last variant is less clean and is not actually useful in Fedora. - to make rpmlint more happy, remove DOS'ish '\r' from CREDITS file. All suggested changes are in the following patch. > I guess we can do 127.0.0.1 but I will need to add a comment to it that this > is made clear to be the internal ip of the gateway. Well, as user should set "ip-range" and "local-ip" to his/her specific values anyway, it would be not much hard to set or comment-out the listen-address too. At least, the user will be noticed about possible security risks (reading a comment you will write), and will remember this notation (as he/she has been compelled not only to read the comment, but also to change the listen-address manually :)). > As for your l2tpd/ppp problems, please give me a log of the l2tpd -D output, > and if possible an 'ipsec barf' output. This bug is more rare rather than repeated. I'll try to catch something later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From skvidal at phy.duke.edu Thu Dec 15 14:30:11 2005 From: skvidal at phy.duke.edu (seth vidal) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:30:11 -0500 Subject: Extras repo cleanup In-Reply-To: <43A16E46.2070409@linux-kernel.at> References: <43A16596.1000409@linux-kernel.at> <1134652337.10939.16.camel@thl.ct.heise.de> <20051215131402.GB12468@ryoko.camperquake.de> <43A16E46.2070409@linux-kernel.at> Message-ID: <1134657012.22019.90.camel@cutter> > I'm wondering that core/devel and core/fc4 is clean - no old pkgs (where > it would be needed much more than in extras); But in extras/devel and > extras/fc4 we keep older pkgs. > > However, I would suggest > > fedora/extras/4 > fedora/extras/4_old > fedora/extras/development > fedora/extras/development_old > 1. it would mean touching packages already in the tree on EVERY update push 2. it would mean A LOT more traffic for the mirrors b/c rsync doesn't know about 'move this file to this subdir' -sv From jspaleta at gmail.com Thu Dec 15 14:40:22 2005 From: jspaleta at gmail.com (Jeff Spaleta) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:40:22 -0500 Subject: Extras repo cleanup In-Reply-To: <43A16E46.2070409@linux-kernel.at> References: <43A16596.1000409@linux-kernel.at> <1134652337.10939.16.camel@thl.ct.heise.de> <20051215131402.GB12468@ryoko.camperquake.de> <43A16E46.2070409@linux-kernel.at> Message-ID: <604aa7910512150640kfae2a06xb8d2d63d1657a170@mail.gmail.com> On 12/15/05, Oliver Falk wrote: > fedora/extras/4 > fedora/extras/4_old Doesn't continually moving items to a different directory as they age incur extra bandwidth cost to mirrors who choose to keep the old packages? Won't they have to download them twice? Because of Extras "rolling" model with no definable "release" trees to fallback to, I am strongly in favor of keeping at least one old version of the packages in the extras trees and mirrored for the final Core releases for some reasonable amount of time. For Extras-development, I frankly don't care if the old packages stay any length of time at all..officially. -jef"Hmm, I thought Seth or someone was working on automating the clean-out process"spaleta From skvidal at phy.duke.edu Thu Dec 15 14:43:50 2005 From: skvidal at phy.duke.edu (seth vidal) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:43:50 -0500 Subject: Extras repo cleanup In-Reply-To: <604aa7910512150640kfae2a06xb8d2d63d1657a170@mail.gmail.com> References: <43A16596.1000409@linux-kernel.at> <1134652337.10939.16.camel@thl.ct.heise.de> <20051215131402.GB12468@ryoko.camperquake.de> <43A16E46.2070409@linux-kernel.at> <604aa7910512150640kfae2a06xb8d2d63d1657a170@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1134657830.22019.92.camel@cutter> On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 09:40 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 12/15/05, Oliver Falk wrote: > > fedora/extras/4 > > fedora/extras/4_old > > Doesn't continually moving items to a different directory as they age > incur extra bandwidth cost to mirrors who choose to keep the old > packages? Won't they have to download them twice? > > Because of Extras "rolling" model with no definable "release" trees to > fallback to, I am strongly in favor of keeping at least one old > version of the packages in the extras trees and mirrored for the final > Core releases for some reasonable amount of time. > > For Extras-development, I frankly don't care if the old packages stay > any length of time at all..officially. > > -jef"Hmm, I thought Seth or someone was working on automating the > clean-out process"spaleta It is automated. We only keep the latest 2 packages in extras. it's been that way for at least a month now. -sv From oliver at linux-kernel.at Thu Dec 15 14:47:19 2005 From: oliver at linux-kernel.at (Oliver Falk) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:47:19 +0100 Subject: Extras repo cleanup In-Reply-To: <1134657012.22019.90.camel@cutter> References: <43A16596.1000409@linux-kernel.at> <1134652337.10939.16.camel@thl.ct.heise.de> <20051215131402.GB12468@ryoko.camperquake.de> <43A16E46.2070409@linux-kernel.at> <1134657012.22019.90.camel@cutter> Message-ID: <43A181F7.6090201@linux-kernel.at> On 12/15/2005 03:30 PM, seth vidal wrote: >> I'm wondering that core/devel and core/fc4 is clean - no old pkgs (where >> it would be needed much more than in extras); But in extras/devel and >> extras/fc4 we keep older pkgs. >> >> However, I would suggest >> >> fedora/extras/4 >> fedora/extras/4_old >> fedora/extras/development >> fedora/extras/development_old >> > > 1. it would mean touching packages already in the tree on EVERY update > push > 2. it would mean A LOT more traffic for the mirrors b/c rsync doesn't > know about 'move this file to this subdir' Yes, you are correct... Forgot about this... Best, Oliver From fedora at leemhuis.info Thu Dec 15 14:51:03 2005 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:51:03 +0100 Subject: Extras repo cleanup In-Reply-To: <604aa7910512150640kfae2a06xb8d2d63d1657a170@mail.gmail.com> References: <43A16596.1000409@linux-kernel.at> <1134652337.10939.16.camel@thl.ct.heise.de> <20051215131402.GB12468@ryoko.camperquake.de> <43A16E46.2070409@linux-kernel.at> <604aa7910512150640kfae2a06xb8d2d63d1657a170@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1134658263.10939.35.camel@thl.ct.heise.de> Am Donnerstag, den 15.12.2005, 09:40 -0500 schrieb Jeff Spaleta: > On 12/15/05, Oliver Falk wrote: > > fedora/extras/4 > > fedora/extras/4_old > > Because of Extras "rolling" model with no definable "release" trees to > fallback to, I am strongly in favor of keeping at least one old > version of the packages in the extras trees and mirrored for the final > Core releases for some reasonable amount of time. As I said, this is the case and also should not change. The proposed change that started this thread only was meant for devel. >-jef"Hmm, I thought Seth or someone was working on automating the > clean-out process"spaleta Yes, Seth did it. CU thl From aportal at univ-montp2.fr Thu Dec 15 15:38:39 2005 From: aportal at univ-montp2.fr (Alain PORTAL) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:38:39 +0100 Subject: Add a file in a package Message-ID: <200512151638.42279.aportal@univ-montp2.fr> Hi, I need to add a "README.Fedora" file (as SOURCE1) in docdir. How can I do that ? Regards, Alain -- Les pages de manuel Linux en fran?ais : http://manpagesfr.free.fr -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From paul at city-fan.org Thu Dec 15 15:49:22 2005 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:49:22 +0000 Subject: Add a file in a package In-Reply-To: <200512151638.42279.aportal@univ-montp2.fr> References: <200512151638.42279.aportal@univ-montp2.fr> Message-ID: <43A19082.5090906@city-fan.org> Alain PORTAL wrote: > I need to add a "README.Fedora" file (as SOURCE1) in docdir. > How can I do that ? One way: Source1: README.Fedora %prep %setup ... # Copy README.Fedora into extracted tarball directory %{__cp} -p %{SOURCE1} . %files %defattr(... %doc README.Fedora Paul. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 15:51:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:51:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512151551.jBFFpSXD002798@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2005-12-15 10:51 EST ------- Thanks Dmitry. I've manually applied your changes (patch did not apply cleanly). I did add the chap-secrets.sample to %doc, and made some minor changes in the text for l2tpd.conf. (and thanks, I've incorporated these last corrections to nsd as well) ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/l2tpd/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/l2tpd.spec ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/l2tpd/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/l2tpd-0.69.20051030-16.src.rpm Thanks again for your time to look at the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 16:23:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:23:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512151623.jBFGNGdF007602@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-15 11:23 EST ------- You hurry up. :( "-g" appears again, wrong version-release come back, etc. Please, apply changes against the spec file specified in the comment #25 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 16:27:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512151627.jBFGR2RR008116@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-15 11:26 EST ------- Just apply my last patch (it should be successful with comment #25 spec file), then add your chap-secrets file back (as you want it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 16:41:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:41:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174529] Review Request: clearsilver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512151641.jBFGfx35010326@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clearsilver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174529 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-15 11:41 EST ------- 0.10.2 is out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 16:42:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:42:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512151642.jBFGgqcf010554@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-15 11:42 EST ------- thx, applied the patches: * Thu Dec 15 2005 Enrico Scholz - 0.40-1.10 - obsolete 'smart-gui' + 'smart-update' packages from Dag and ATrpms as suggested in bz #175438 comment 19 * Thu Dec 15 2005 Ville Skytt? - Install icons to %_datadir/icons/hicolor. - Improve ksmarttray desktop entry, make icon themeable and visible in GNOME too. http://ensc.de/fedora/smart.spec http://ensc.de/fedora/smart-0.40-1.10.src.rpm GNU Arch: | $ tla register-archive ensc at ensc.de--fedora http://ensc.de/tla/{archives}/fedora | $ tla get -A ensc at ensc.de--fedora smart--review--0 smart ======== This version obsoletes some packages from DAG and ATrpms. Currently, it is a simple 'Obsoletes:'. Shall I also add a corresponding 'Provides:'? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 16:46:10 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:46:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174529] Review Request: clearsilver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512151646.jBFGkACR011023@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clearsilver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174529 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2005-12-15 11:46 EST ------- And it almost builds/installs on x86_64. Not quite. configure doesn't detect PYTHON_SITE, so install fails. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 16:51:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:51:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174529] Review Request: clearsilver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512151651.jBFGpPoR011964@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clearsilver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174529 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-15 11:51 EST ------- Sounds promising and probably easy enough to patch in the specfile... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 17:21:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:21:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512151721.jBFHLTfb019286@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-15 12:21 EST ------- OK BTW, always incement release after each change (even trrivial). For the current: ftp://ftp.openswan.org/l2tpd/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/l2tpd-0.69-0.1.20051030.src.rpm MUST/SHOULD items OK Works good. APPROVED! Before commit to CVS, please, add some comment about how to obtain the source tarball from the upstream's cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 17:35:40 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:35:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175840] New: Review Request:
Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175840 Summary: Review Request:
Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: SRPM Name or Url: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 17:36:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:36:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175840] Review Request: xmlrpc-c -- A lightweight RPC library based on XML and HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512151736.jBFHanWP023622@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-c -- A lightweight RPC library based on XML and HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175840 enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
|A lightweight RPC library | |based on XML and HTTP ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-15 12:36 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://ensc.de/fedora/xmlrpc-c.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://ensc.de/fedora/xmlrpc-c-1.04-0.src.rpm GNU Arch: tla register-archive ensc at ensc.de--fedora http://ensc.de/tla/{archives}/fedora tla get -A ensc at ensc.de--fedora xmlrpc-c--review--0 smart XML-RPC is a quick-and-easy way to make procedure calls over the Internet. It converts the procedure call into XML document, sends it to a remote server using HTTP, and gets back the response as XML. This library provides a modular implementation of XML-RPC for C and C++. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From imlinux at gmail.com Thu Dec 15 17:42:21 2005 From: imlinux at gmail.com (Mike McGrath) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:42:21 -0600 Subject: System accounts Message-ID: <43A1AAFD.6070308@gmail.com> When packaging an RPM that requires a system account, how is it decided what UID and GID that account gets? For example, Apache's UID is 48 in the spec file. How did this id get chosen and who keeps a list of uid's so there's no overlap? -Mike From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 17:53:44 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:53:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175844] New: Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175844 Summary: Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: somlo at cmu.edu QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/wmx.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/wmx-6pl1-1.src.rpm Description: wmx is a really simple and basic window manager for the X windowing system. This is my first package submission, seeking sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 17:56:36 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:56:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK2 & compat-wxPythonGTK2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512151756.jBFHuaWs029588@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-wxGTK2 & compat-wxPythonGTK2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175500 mattdm at mattdm.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mattdm at mattdm.org ------- Additional Comments From mattdm at mattdm.org 2005-12-15 12:56 EST ------- Matthias -- by all means, please review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From mattdm at mattdm.org Thu Dec 15 18:00:49 2005 From: mattdm at mattdm.org (Matthew Miller) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:00:49 -0500 Subject: inkscape maintained? In-Reply-To: <1134418430.14948.45.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> References: <1134418430.14948.45.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> Message-ID: <20051215180049.GA1936@jadzia.bu.edu> On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 10:13:50PM +0200, Ville Skytt? wrote: > Inkscape in FE is currently AFAIK affected by an arbitrary code > execution vulnerability, #173993 was posted about three weeks ago and it > seems that a simple version upgrade would fix it. But there's no > response to the bugzilla ticket; is the package still maintained? > (No, sorry, I'm not volunteering ;)) FWIW, I sent the listed maintainer a question about updating to 0.43 a while ago, and didn't get an answer. -- Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org Boston University Linux ------> From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de Thu Dec 15 18:07:32 2005 From: enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de (Enrico Scholz) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:07:32 +0100 Subject: System accounts In-Reply-To: <43A1AAFD.6070308@gmail.com> (Mike McGrath's message of "Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:42:21 -0600") References: <43A1AAFD.6070308@gmail.com> Message-ID: <87ek4exmhn.fsf@kosh.bigo.ensc.de> imlinux at gmail.com (Mike McGrath) writes: > When packaging an RPM that requires a system account, how is it decided > what UID and GID that account gets? For example, Apache's UID is 48 in > the spec file. How did this id get chosen and who keeps a list of > uid's so there's no overlap? It's unspecified and you can do what you want. 'fedora-usermgmt' is a try to solve the UID/GID problem but was never accepted by all people. You can register your user at (the unofficial) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserRegistry page. You can also read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserCreation how to use 'fedora-usermgmt'. Enrico -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 480 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 18:22:17 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:22:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175276] Review Request: gift: daemon for communicating with filesharing protocols In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512151822.jBFIMHRU004791@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gift: daemon for communicating with filesharing protocols https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175276 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-15 13:22 EST ------- %changelog * Wed Dec 14 2005 Rex Dieter 0.11.8.1-3 - --enable-libmagic Spec Name or Url:http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/gift-0.11.8.1-3.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/gift-0.11.8.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 18:34:04 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:34:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175840] Review Request: xmlrpc-c -- A lightweight RPC library based on XML and HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512151834.jBFIY4Gm008058@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-c -- A lightweight RPC library based on XML and HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175840 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |ville.skytta at iki.fi OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-15 13:33 EST ------- w3c-libwww no longer exists in Rawhide, remove the build dep and add --disable-libwww-client for all distro versions? Missing BuildRequires: libxml2-devel Is there a good reason to introduce the static library? Suggesting --disable-static - see packaging guidelines docs: drop configure_doc and INSTALL, move DEVELOPING to -devel (or drop it)? License isn't quite BSD but rather looks like a collection of various licenses; suggesting "Distributable" Build fails on devel (gcc 4.1.0), even with --disable-libwww-client: libwww.cpp:39: error: definition of 'void xmlrpc_c::carriageParm_libwww0::carriageParm_libwww0(std::string)' is not in namespace enclosing 'xmlrpc_c::carriageParm_libwww0' libwww.cpp:46: error: definition of 'void xmlrpc_c::carriageParm_libwww0Ptr::carriageParm_libwww0Ptr()' is not in namespace enclosing 'xmlrpc_c::carriageParm_libwww0Ptr' libwww.cpp:53: error: definition of 'void xmlrpc_c::carriageParm_libwww0Ptr::carriageParm_libwww0Ptr(xmlrpc_c::carriageParm_libwww0*)' is not in namespace enclosing 'xmlrpc_c::carriageParm_libwww0Ptr'#libwww.cpp:60: error: definition of 'xmlrpc_c::carriageParm_libwww0* xmlrpc_c::carriageParm_libwww0Ptr::operator->()' is not in namespace enclosing 'xmlrpc_c::carriageParm_libwww0Ptr' libwww.cpp:72: error: definition of 'void xmlrpc_c::clientXmlTransport_libwww::clientXmlTransport_libwww(std::string, std::string)' is not in namespace enclosing 'xmlrpc_c::clientXmlTransport_libwww' libwww.cpp:97: error: definition of 'void xmlrpc_c::clientXmlTransport_libwww::clientXmlTransport_libwww()' is not in namespace enclosing 'xmlrpc_c::clientXmlTransport_libwww' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 18:55:20 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175848] New: Review Request: xfce4-taskmanager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175848 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-taskmanager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: fedora.wickert at arcor.de QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SPECS/xfce4-taskmanager.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-taskmanager-0.3.1-2.fc4.src.rpm Description: Taskmanager for the Xfce desktop environment Comments: rpmlint ist clean builds fien in mock on core 4 license GPL & inluded -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 15 19:22:23 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:22:23 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051215192223.D61237F7D@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 15 cernlib-2005-9.fc3 fedora-usermgmt-0.8-1 ldns-1.0.0-7.fc3 mlmmj-1.2.9-1.fc3 munin-1.2.4-3.fc3 munin-1.2.4-4.fc3 nsd-2.3.3-6.fc3 nsd-2.3.3-7.fc3 sqlite-3.1.2-0.4 tla-1.3.3-1.fc3 xfce4-cpugraph-plugin-0.2.2-4.fc3 xfce4-datetime-plugin-0.3.1-5.fc3 xfce4-genmon-plugin-1.1-4.fc3 xfce4-weather-plugin-0.4.9-4.fc3 xfce4-windowlist-plugin-0.1.0-4.fc3 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From ville.skytta at iki.fi Thu Dec 15 19:27:06 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:27:06 +0200 Subject: inkscape maintained? In-Reply-To: <20051215180049.GA1936@jadzia.bu.edu> References: <1134418430.14948.45.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> <20051215180049.GA1936@jadzia.bu.edu> Message-ID: <1134674826.8314.42.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 13:00 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 10:13:50PM +0200, Ville Skytt? wrote: > > Inkscape in FE is currently AFAIK affected by an arbitrary code > > execution vulnerability, #173993 was posted about three weeks ago and it > > seems that a simple version upgrade would fix it. But there's no > > response to the bugzilla ticket; is the package still maintained? > > (No, sorry, I'm not volunteering ;)) > > FWIW, I sent the listed maintainer a question about updating to 0.43 a while > ago, and didn't get an answer. Things are better now, Denis set himself as the maintainer yesterday and the FC-4 update will be pushed in a jiffy. devel apparent lags behind though, no sign of an update there. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 15 19:28:24 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:28:24 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051215192824.C91D67F7D@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 22 cernlib-2005-9.fc4.2 fedora-usermgmt-0.8-1 gaim-meanwhile-1.2.6-2.fc4 gnome-applet-timer-1.2-2.fc4 gnomesword-2.1.5-1.fc4 gramps-2.0.9-2.fc4 liboil-0.3.6-1.fc4 meanwhile-1.0.0-1.fc4 mlmmj-1.2.9-1.fc4 munin-1.2.4-3.fc4 munin-1.2.4-4.fc4 nsd-2.3.3-6.fc4 nsd-2.3.3-8.fc4 python-quixote-2.4-1.fc4 tla-1.3.3-2.fc4 tla-1.3.3-3.fc4 xfce4-cpugraph-plugin-0.2.2-4.fc4 xfce4-datetime-plugin-0.3.1-5.fc4 xfce4-genmon-plugin-1.1-4.fc4 xfce4-weather-plugin-0.4.9-4.fc4 xfce4-windowlist-plugin-0.1.0-4.fc4 xfce4-xmms-plugin-0.3.1-4.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 19:38:51 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:38:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175799] Review Request: tor - nonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512151938.jBFJcpRj021733@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - nonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175799 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2005-12-15 14:38 EST ------- Incorporated fixes as advised by Dmitry similar to nsd and l2tpd packages. That is not using /var/run/name.pic, added chkconfig --add, and added a rm -r %{buildroot}. ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/tor/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/tor.spec ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/tor/binaries/fedora/4/SRPMS/tor-0.1.0.15-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 15 19:52:55 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:52:55 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051215195255.D5AFA7F7D@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 29 Coin2-2.4.4-5.fc5 Inventor-2.1.5-16.fc5 WindowMaker-0.92.0-5.fc5 aterm-1.0.0-2.fc5 deskbar-applet-0.8.6.1-1.fc5 gaim-meanwhile-1.2.6-2.fc5 ghdl-0.21-0.35svn.1.fc5 gnome-applet-timer-1.2-1.fc5 gnome-applet-timer-1.2-2.fc5 koffice-1.4.2-3.fc5 l2tpd-0.69-0.1.20051030.2 libAfterImage-1.07-5.fc5 libAfterImage-1.07-6.fc5 liboil-0.3.6-1.fc5 meanwhile-1.0.0-1.fc5 mlmmj-1.2.9-2.1.fc5 mod_auth_pam-1.1.1-3.fc5 munin-1.2.4-4.fc5 naim-0.11.8.1-1.fc5 nsd-2.3.3-6.fc5 orange-0.3-0.cvs20051118.fc5.1 pdftk-1.12-5 tcldom-3.1-2.fc5 xfce4-cpugraph-plugin-0.2.2-4.fc5 xfce4-datetime-plugin-0.3.1-5.fc5 xfce4-genmon-plugin-1.1-4.fc5 xfce4-weather-plugin-0.4.9-4.fc5 xfce4-windowlist-plugin-0.1.0-4.fc5 xfce4-xmms-plugin-0.3.1-4.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 19:53:13 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:53:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512151953.jBFJrD9M025553@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-15 14:53 EST ------- * Thu Dec 15 2005 Enrico Scholz - 0.1.0.15-1.2 - use relative UID of 19 instead of 18 due to conflicts with the 'munin' package http://ensc.de/fedora/tor.spec http://ensc.de/fedora/tor-0.1.0.15-1.2.src.rpm GNU Arch: ensc at ensc.de--fedora (http://ensc.de/tla/{archives}/fedora) tor--review--0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 19:56:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:56:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512151956.jBFJuFHK026418@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2005-12-15 14:56 EST ------- Paul, I don't feel confortable creating a bundle of Log::Dispatch, Log::Dispatch::FileRotate, and Log::Log4perl because: i) these three perl distros are maintained by different people (the three DateTime modules that have been bundled are all maintained by Dave Rolsky) ii) the circular dependencies are only caused by the test suite as this module only extends Log::Dispatch but uses Log::Log4perl as it main log infrastructure in the test suite (most likely, the test suite should be redone using only Log::Dispatch or, at least, conditional require Log::Log4perl). iii) The author of Log::Dispatch::FileRotate doesn't appear to be very responsive, at leasat judging from the rt tickets (http://rt.cpan.org/NoAuth/Bugs.html?Dist=Log-Dispatch-FileRotate); at least I haven't got any answer for #14563. /jpo PS - I will start submitting Log::Log4perl and its building requiments in the next hours/days: I need to review one more time the ones I have at http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From sgrubb at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 20:01:14 2005 From: sgrubb at redhat.com (Steve Grubb) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:01:14 -0500 Subject: Orphan fwbuilder Message-ID: <200512151501.14544.sgrubb@redhat.com> Hi, Does anyone want to take over maintaining fwbuilder? -Steve From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 20:04:05 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:04:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173675] Review Request: xfce4-xmms-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512152004.jBFK45MT027989@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-xmms-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173675 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-15 15:03 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Package will be released for Core 4 and devel soon. Won't build on Core 3 because pango is out of date there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 20:09:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:09:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175799] Review Request: tor - nonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512152009.jBFK9IKO029119@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - nonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175799 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-15 15:09 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 175433 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 20:09:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:09:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512152009.jBFK9PO5029159@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at xtdnet.nl ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-15 15:09 EST ------- *** Bug 175799 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From denis at poolshark.org Thu Dec 15 20:28:48 2005 From: denis at poolshark.org (Denis Leroy) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:28:48 -0800 Subject: inkscape maintained? In-Reply-To: <1134674826.8314.42.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> References: <1134418430.14948.45.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> <20051215180049.GA1936@jadzia.bu.edu> <1134674826.8314.42.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> Message-ID: <43A1D200.3040405@poolshark.org> Ville Skytt? wrote: > On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 13:00 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > >>On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 10:13:50PM +0200, Ville Skytt? wrote: >> >>>Inkscape in FE is currently AFAIK affected by an arbitrary code >>>execution vulnerability, #173993 was posted about three weeks ago and it >>>seems that a simple version upgrade would fix it. But there's no >>>response to the bugzilla ticket; is the package still maintained? >>>(No, sorry, I'm not volunteering ;)) >> >>FWIW, I sent the listed maintainer a question about updating to 0.43 a while >>ago, and didn't get an answer. > > > Things are better now, Denis set himself as the maintainer yesterday and > the FC-4 update will be pushed in a jiffy. devel apparent lags behind > though, no sign of an update there. Working on it, some patches are required to compile 0.43 with g++ 4.1.0 From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 20:46:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:46:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175840] Review Request: xmlrpc-c -- A lightweight RPC library based on XML and HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512152046.jBFKk0gX003469@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-c -- A lightweight RPC library based on XML and HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175840 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-15 15:45 EST ------- * Thu Dec 15 2005 Enrico Scholz - 1.04-0.1 - disabled w3c-libwww because it does not exist anymore in FC5 and seems to be unmaintained upstream - added missing libxml2-devel - cleaned up list of %%doc files - fixed gcc4.1 build issues - removed static libraries when there exists a corresponding dynamic one http://ensc.de/fedora/xmlrpc-c.spec http://ensc.de/fedora/xmlrpc-c-1.04-0.1.src.rpm ======== > Is there a good reason to introduce the static library? Suggesting > --disable-static - see packaging guidelines It's not so easy... Upstream tries to replace the proved autotool buildsystem with a custom, own one. So '--disable-static' does not work. I workarounded it by removing some .a files manually. But there will static libraries still stay. There does not exist a way to build the dynamic counterpart of the static C++ libraries > docs: drop configure_doc and INSTALL, move DEVELOPING to -devel (or > drop it)? ACK for configure_doc and INSTALL. But DEVELOPING might be useful and I do not want to add a single %doc file to the -devel package > License isn't quite BSD but rather looks like a collection of various > licenses; suggesting "Distributable" I use BSD/PSF now gcc-4.1 build errors should be fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 21:09:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:09:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174529] Review Request: clearsilver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512152109.jBFL9CFZ008952@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clearsilver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174529 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2005-12-15 16:09 EST ------- Rebuild for clearsilver 0.10.2 Spec Name or Url: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/clearsilver/clearsilver.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/clearsilver/clearsilver-0.10.2-1.src.rpm Please, someone verify this RPM builds on FC4/x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 21:41:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:41:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169731] Review Request: ecl - Embeddable Common-Lisp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512152141.jBFLfEnM015633@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecl - Embeddable Common-Lisp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169731 ------- Additional Comments From gemi at bluewin.ch 2005-12-15 16:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I notice a clisp-devel package, for what it's worth. Oh, I meant gcl. What you propose that should go into the devel package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 21:51:10 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:51:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175844] Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512152151.jBFLpAtW018140@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175844 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at newmail.ru 2005-12-15 16:50 EST ------- Needs some work: > Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Use only internet-names, like: Source0: http://www.all-day-breakfast.com/wmx/wmx-6.tar.gz I can't find where can I download examples. > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-root Use the following string: BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > make It's always a good idea to use the following expression instead of plain "make": %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} > rm -rf %{buildroot} Instead, use: %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} and so on... You'd better to look at the spec-files which conforms the fedora-extras rules. You may find 'em at the: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/?root=extras Anyway, it's a good idea to include a lightweight wm info FE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 21:53:01 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:53:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175844] Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512152153.jBFLr1ja018690@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175844 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at newmail.ru 2005-12-15 16:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Needs some work: > > > Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > > Use only internet-names, like: > > Source0: http://www.all-day-breakfast.com/wmx/wmx-6.tar.gz Oops! Source0: http://www.all-day-breakfast.com/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 21:55:01 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:55:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173722] Review Request: stratagus - Real-time strategy gaming engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512152155.jBFLt12t019267@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stratagus - Real-time strategy gaming engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173722 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at newmail.ru 2005-12-15 16:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Any status on getting sponsored? You probably want the sponsor to take over the > proper review. Warren Togami kindly granted me a sponsorship. So all I need is a approvement of Stratagus. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 22:11:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:11:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512152211.jBFMBk5M023423@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net 2005-12-15 17:11 EST ------- Please make the obsoletes always versioned otherwise this will harm compatibility instead of supporting it. And also use provides in general, I can't say whether any other packages depend on obsoleted items (I can for ATrpms, but not for all other repos). I didn't check with Guideline wording, but the suggestion there should be to use (simplified w/o potential epochs): Obsolete: old <= %{version}-%{release} Provide: old = %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 22:24:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:24:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175844] Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512152224.jBFMOPnm026011@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175844 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-15 17:24 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > > rm -rf %{buildroot} > > Instead, use: > > %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} > > and so on... Strictly speaking, it's completely optional to use the macros instead of the commands. (In reply to comment #2) > > Source0: http://www.all-day-breakfast.com/wmx/wmx-6.tar.gz > > Oops! > > Source0: http://www.all-day-breakfast.com/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Actually, macros should only be used in the tarball filename, not in the path. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 15 22:43:57 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:43:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512152243.jBFMhv40029740@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-15 17:43 EST ------- (In reply to comment #27) > Obsolete: old <= %{version}-%{release} > Provide: old = %{version}-%{release} Nitpicks of the day: that would be self-obsoletion, fixed with s/<=/ Message-ID: <200512152245.jBFMjvSf030239@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-15 17:45 EST ------- * Thu Dec 15 2005 Enrico Scholz - 0.40-1.11 - made the Obsoletes: versioned and added the corresponding Provides: http://ensc.de/fedora/smart.spec http://ensc.de/fedora/smart-0.40-1.11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ville.skytta at iki.fi Thu Dec 15 22:55:31 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:55:31 +0200 Subject: rpms/nethack-vultures/devel nethack-vultures-1.11.0-config.patch, NONE, 1.1 nethack-vultures.spec, 1.7, 1.8 In-Reply-To: <200512152238.jBFMcdMf013910@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> References: <200512152238.jBFMcdMf013910@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1134687331.13582.11.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 17:38 -0500, Karen Rei Pease wrote: > %changelog > +* Thu Dec 15 2005 Karen Pease - 1.11.0-5 > +- That patch was fixed, but.. the folly of not checking all patches :P > + Sorry to be blunt, but seeing the iteration of 5 revisions, all entirely trivial changes, to get a simple version upgrade right smells like you haven't tested the rpm package at all before committing and trying to ship it. Naughty! Please test a bit more in the future. (I have no doubts that you hadn't tested the software itself, but I'm talking about the Extras _package_ of it here, this update of which seems very much untested to me). More notes: - No longer used patches should be removed from CVS - 1.11.0-2 and -1 and 1.10.1-1 still contain %{?dist} in %changelog From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 00:13:45 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:13:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175895] New: Review Request: perl-DBD-XBase - Perl module for reading and writing the dbf files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175895 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-XBase - Perl module for reading and writing the dbf files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-DBD-XBase.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-DBD-XBase-0.241-1.src.rpm Description: This module can read and write XBase database files, known as dbf in dBase and FoxPro world. It also transparently reads memo fields from the dbt, fpt and smt files and works with index files (ndx, ntx, mdx, idx, cdx and SDBM). This module XBase.pm provides simple native interface to XBase files. For DBI compliant database access, see DBD::XBase and DBI modules and their man pages. Note: This is a perl-SQL-Statement BR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 00:15:51 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:15:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175896] New: Review Request: perl-SQL-Statement - SQL parsing and processing engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175896 Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Statement - SQL parsing and processing engine Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-SQL-Statement.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-SQL-Statement-1.14-1.src.rpm Description: The SQL::Statement module implements a pure Perl SQL parsing and execution engine. While it by no means implements full ANSI standard, it does support many features including column and table aliases, built-in and user-defined functions, implicit and explicit joins, complexly nested search conditions, and other features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 00:19:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:19:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175898] New: Review Request: perl-Text-CSV_XS - Comma-separated values manipulation routines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175898 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-CSV_XS - Comma-separated values manipulation routines Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Text-CSV_XS-0.23-1.src.rpm Description: Text::CSV provides facilities for the composition and decomposition of comma-separated values. An instance of the Text::CSV class can combine fields into a CSV string and parse a CSV string into fields. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 00:26:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:26:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175899] New: Review Request: perl-DBD-CSV - DBI driver for CSV files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175899 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-CSV - DBI driver for CSV files Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-DBD-CSV.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-DBD-CSV-0.22-1.src.rpm Description: The DBD::CSV module is yet another driver for the DBI (Database independent interface for Perl). This one is based on the SQL "engine" SQL::Statement and the abstract DBI driver DBD::File and implements access to so-called CSV files (Comma separated values). Such files are mostly used for exporting MS Access and MS Excel data. Note: This is a perl-Log-Log4perl BR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Fri Dec 16 01:08:13 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 02:08:13 +0100 Subject: System accounts In-Reply-To: <87ek4exmhn.fsf@kosh.bigo.ensc.de> References: <43A1AAFD.6070308@gmail.com> <87ek4exmhn.fsf@kosh.bigo.ensc.de> Message-ID: <1134695294.30243.180.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 19:07 +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote: > imlinux at gmail.com (Mike McGrath) writes: > > > When packaging an RPM that requires a system account, how is it decided > > what UID and GID that account gets? For example, Apache's UID is 48 in > > the spec file. How did this id get chosen and who keeps a list of > > uid's so there's no overlap? > > It's unspecified and you can do what you want. 'fedora-usermgmt' is a try > to solve the UID/GID problem but was never accepted by all people. You > can register your user at (the unofficial) > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserRegistry > > page. You can also read > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserCreation > > how to use 'fedora-usermgmt'. This case is a great example of a case of why fedora-usermgnt is a superflous: Your non-Fedora servers will not know about this uid, whether you are using fedora-usermgnt or not. You will always have to add this uid manually, if you want to share apache files on your network. Ralf From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 03:10:10 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:10:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174529] Review Request: clearsilver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512160310.jBG3AAAu003748@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clearsilver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174529 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2005-12-15 22:10 EST ------- On a fc4 x86_64 machine I have access to the src.rpm in comment #16 fails to build with: make[2]: Leaving directory `/u/u2/kevin/rpm/BUILD/clearsilver-0.10.2/ruby/ext/hdf' <--- ext/hdf <--- ext install.rb: setup done. Running ruby test test/hdftest.rb:36: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [x86_64-linux] /bin/sh: line 1: 26495 Aborted /usr/bin/ruby -Ilib -Iext/hdf test/hdftest.rb >hdftest.out Failed Ruby Test: hdftest.rb See hdftest.out and hdftest.err make[1]: *** [testrb] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/u/u2/kevin/rpm/BUILD/clearsilver-0.10.2/ruby' make: *** [cs] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.87193 (%build) --- hdftest.out --- 1 = farming 2 = sewing 3 = bowling party.1 [Drool="True"] = baloons party.2 [Pink] = noise makers party.3 << EOM telling long stories EOM arf.1 = farming arf.2 = sewing arf.3 = bowling arf.party.1 [Drool="True"] = baloons arf.party.2 [Pink] = noise makers arf.party.3 << EOM telling long stories EOM party.2 attr (Pink=1) ---hdftest.out--- ---hdftest.err--- 19a20,27 > This is a funny test. farming. > > baloons > > noise makers > > telling long > stories ---hdftest.err--- Dunno if that helps, but thought I would throw it in... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 03:48:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:48:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173657] Review Request: xfce4-clipman-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512160348.jBG3mRnv011979@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-clipman-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173657 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2005-12-15 22:48 EST ------- Good: - builds ok on fc4/devel - rpmlint clean - license is (non ad) BSD... good. - works fine on my fc4 laptop. - source is correct and matches upstream. - meets naming and package guidelines. Everything looks good... APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 04:05:44 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 23:05:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175895] Review Request: perl-DBD-XBase - Perl module for reading and writing the dbf files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512160405.jBG45ijr015411@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-XBase - Perl module for reading and writing the dbf files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175895 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |rc040203 at freenet.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-15 23:05 EST ------- Basically the package seems OK to me, but I am seeing 2 minor issues with it: 1. The package contains /usr/bin/indexdump. This name ("indexdump") seems too general/generic to me for this specialized tools to have it in /usr/bin. May-be one should consider to split the applications out of the perl-module package into a separate application package. I am not sure. 2. Something it broken with the Makefile. The ./bin/indexdump being generated inside when running "make" contains two "#!/usr/bin/perl -w" shebangs instead of one. Anyway, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From aportal at univ-montp2.fr Fri Dec 16 08:12:03 2005 From: aportal at univ-montp2.fr (Alain PORTAL) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:12:03 +0100 Subject: Add a file in a package In-Reply-To: <43A19082.5090906@city-fan.org> References: <200512151638.42279.aportal@univ-montp2.fr> <43A19082.5090906@city-fan.org> Message-ID: <200512160912.06267.aportal@univ-montp2.fr> Le Jeudi 15 D?cembre 2005 16:49, Paul Howarth a ?crit : > Alain PORTAL wrote: > > I need to add a "README.Fedora" file (as SOURCE1) in docdir. > > How can I do that ? > > One way: > > Source1: README.Fedora > > %prep > %setup ... > # Copy README.Fedora into extracted tarball directory > %{__cp} -p %{SOURCE1} . > > %files > %defattr(... > %doc README.Fedora It was exactly what I want to do. Thanks Paul Yous sincerely Alain. -- Les pages de manuel Linux en fran?ais : http://manpagesfr.free.fr -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 08:37:11 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 03:37:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175840] Review Request: xmlrpc-c -- A lightweight RPC library based on XML and HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512160837.jBG8bBK6013540@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-c -- A lightweight RPC library based on XML and HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175840 ville.skytta at iki.fi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-16 03:36 EST ------- Approved assuming the following are fixed before requesting the first build: - Missing "Requires: libxml2-devel" in -devel, see xmlrpc-c-config --libs - Use "%doc doc/*" instead of "%doc doc" in main package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 08:53:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 03:53:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175605] Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512160853.jBG8rVPY015176@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175605 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-16 03:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > http://www.biosci.ki.se/users/lmb/SRPMS/perl-IO-Multiplex-1.08-4.src.rpm Package seems OK to me - APPROVED (In reply to comment #5) > Forgot to mention that this is my first package and that I need a sponsor. Please follow Step 8 in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From dan at danny.cz Fri Dec 16 09:05:41 2005 From: dan at danny.cz (Dan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hor=E1k?=) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:05:41 +0100 Subject: rpms/tinyerp/FC-3 tinyerp.spec,1.7,1.8 In-Reply-To: <1134573269.30243.73.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <200512141425.jBEEP0fB004041@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <1134573269.30243.73.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <1134723941.3200.25.camel@eagle.danny.cz> I think that I as the packager can say something too :-) > 1. Why /bin/bash? > /bin/bash should _never_ be used for reserved accounts - It's a security > risk. > There are two thing - running a pure application as root or having an user for it. Some real shell is needed because the startup script does "su -l tinyerp -c /tmp/real_startup_script". And only root can login to this account (at least on my FC4). If there is an other way how to do it, please, let me know. My goals were - be able to run the server from init.d during system startup (and not from user's terminal), store the logs somewhere in /var/log, use a config file instead of built-in defaults, ... Yes, better variant is to improve tinyerp's own server capabilities. But I am not a Python guru, so I have choosen this way. > 2. You this %pre rule will have no effect if the user already exists. > => This won't work. > > 3. Why fedora-useradd? > > * Use literal account name instead of numerical ones and a plain > user-add probably will be sufficient. > * IMO, fedora-usermgt is a design wart that should not be used anywhere. Using fedora-usermgmt was suggested to me by Tom 'Spot' Callaway, the original tinyerp packager as the way how to do it in Fedora. It would be nice to have such method for adding application-dependent users in other distributions too. Dan From fedora at camperquake.de Fri Dec 16 09:33:36 2005 From: fedora at camperquake.de (Ralf Ertzinger) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:33:36 +0100 Subject: Rebuilding someone elses package Message-ID: <20051216093336.GA30172@ryoko.camperquake.de> Hi. Two weeks ago I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174287 which requests a rebuild of x3270 for the new openssl in bugzilla. So far there has been no response. How are we supposed to handle this? Assuming the package still builds with the new Openssl (an I have no indication that it would not), can I just request a rebuild if the maintainer is not responding? (This special case is a little more complicated as the package also Requires: /usr/X11R6/bin/mkfontdir which would have to be changed to the new path, so it is not a simple "increase release number and push to build system"). From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 09:31:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 04:31:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168578] Review Request: perl-Class-ErrorHandler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512160931.jBG9VxRb019476@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-ErrorHandler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168578 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-16 04:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Ping - Steve, it's more than 2 months since this package has been approved. > > I am sorry, but don't see any other possibility but to close this Request as > FAILED shouldn't you respond within 1 week from now, This week has passed, no reaction from Steve so far. As this package blocks others, instead of letting it FAIL, I've decided to import it into CVS, request a built on devel and to mark it as orphaned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 09:32:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 04:32:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168607] Review Request: perl-Convert-PEM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512160932.jBG9W81p019540@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Convert-PEM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168607 Bug 168607 depends on bug 168578, which changed state. Bug 168578 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-ErrorHandler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168578 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 09:41:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 04:41:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175566] Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512160941.jBG9fXdM020758@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175566 ------- Additional Comments From adrian at lisas.de 2005-12-16 04:41 EST ------- This builds in "mock -r fedora-4-i386-core" but not in "mock -r fedora-development-i386-core". As the devel branch is the first it is imported into it should build also there. So it would be great if you change if to build in that branch. There are now a lot of uncommented lines which make the spec a bit unreadable. It ould be better, from my point of view, if the unused lines are removed. General comments are no problem just lines like "#%{_datadir}/apps/kbibtex/kbibtex_shell.rc" have no real value. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 10:08:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:08:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173675] Review Request: xfce4-xmms-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512161008.jBGA82qV025118@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-xmms-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173675 ------- Additional Comments From luya256 at yahoo.com 2005-12-16 05:07 EST ------- Perhaps by lowering pango version on the spec file this package will be built for FC3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From paul at city-fan.org Fri Dec 16 10:14:56 2005 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:14:56 +0000 Subject: rpms/tinyerp/FC-3 tinyerp.spec,1.7,1.8 In-Reply-To: <1134723941.3200.25.camel@eagle.danny.cz> References: <200512141425.jBEEP0fB004041@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <1134573269.30243.73.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1134723941.3200.25.camel@eagle.danny.cz> Message-ID: <43A293A0.2070509@city-fan.org> Dan Hor?k wrote: > I think that I as the packager can say something too :-) > > >>1. Why /bin/bash? >>/bin/bash should _never_ be used for reserved accounts - It's a security >>risk. >> > > > There are two thing - running a pure application as root or having an > user for it. Some real shell is needed because the startup script does > "su -l tinyerp -c /tmp/real_startup_script". And only root can login to > this account (at least on my FC4). If there is an other way how to do > it, please, let me know. How about having /sbin/nologin as the shell for tinyerp and using: runuser -s /bin/sh -c /tmp/real_startup_script tinyerp That's the equivalent of what I use in the bittorrent package. This approach will still present a problem for anyone mounting /tmp with the noexec option though. At the minimum I'd have the initscript use a variable (configurable in /etc/sysconfig/tinyerp) for where to put the real_startup_script, so that it can be run from some other directory. Paul. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 10:18:48 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:18:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174320] Review Request: gcdmaster - Gnome Audio CD mastering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512161018.jBGAImNe026718@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcdmaster - Gnome Audio CD mastering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174320 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-16 05:18 EST ------- Good * Named according to PackageNamingGuidelines * Spec file matches base package name * Package meets packaging guidelines * Licensed with appropriate licence (GPL), matches license in upstream package * Spec file written in understandable americano english * md5sum of source tarball matches upstream * builds in mock on fc4 x86 * No un-necessary BuildRequires * No locales * Package owns all directories it creates * Proper perms and %defattr() * No libtool files packaged * Proper desktop file - proper update-mime-database & update-desktop-database in scriptlets * rpmlint output: [mpeters at utility result]$ ls *.rpm gcdmaster-1.2.1-1.fc4.i386.rpm gcdmaster-debuginfo-1.2.1-1.fc4.i386.rpm gcdmaster-1.2.1-1.fc4.src.rpm [mpeters at utility result]$ rpmlint *.rpm E: gcdmaster zero-length /usr/share/doc/gcdmaster-1.2.1/NEWS [mpeters at utility result]$ build pretty clean: [mpeters at utility result]$ grep "warning" build.log dlg_a.c:255: warning: ignoring return value of 'sscanf', declared with attribute warn_unused_result dlg_a.c:262: warning: ignoring return value of 'sscanf', declared with attribute warn_unused_result dlg_a.c:269: warning: ignoring return value of 'sscanf', declared with attribute warn_unused_result AudioCDView.cc:888: warning: ignoring return value of 'int sscanf(const char*, const char*, ...)', declared with attribute warn_unused_result warning: Could not canonicalize hostname: utility.mpeters.local [mpeters at utility result]$ Needs Work * Please remove the INSTALL file from %doc It is meaningless to the end user. * Please remove NEWS file - it's empty Suggestions Not required, would be nice though - Allow for a user defined macro that will build with mp3 support if user has the needed stuff for mp3 support. IE - rpmbuild --define 'mp3 1' --rebuild src.rpm would try to rebuild w/ mp3 support enabled. I seem to remember some other packages that did this in the past, I think an audio editing app did. -=- At any rate - with the removal of the INSTALL and NEWS from %doc, I'll approve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From aportal at univ-montp2.fr Fri Dec 16 11:54:59 2005 From: aportal at univ-montp2.fr (Alain PORTAL) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:54:59 +0100 Subject: rpmlint error Message-ID: <200512161255.01752.aportal@univ-montp2.fr> Hi, When I launch rpmlint on the package I've built, I get the following error: E: pikdev binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pikdev ['/usr/lib', '/usr/lib/qt-3.3/lib', '/usr/X11R6/lib'] I don't understand this error, could somebody tell me more about it? Regards, Alain. -- Les pages de manuel Linux en fran?ais : http://manpagesfr.free.fr -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 12:03:22 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 07:03:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173979] Review Request: Licq - A graphical ICQ Client for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512161203.jBGC3MIC012046@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Licq - A graphical ICQ Client for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173979 pvrabec at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From pvrabec at redhat.com 2005-12-16 07:03 EST ------- I have fixed these issues from comment #2. Tomas, could u review the new package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 12:52:21 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 07:52:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173675] Review Request: xfce4-xmms-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512161252.jBGCqL3D017364@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-xmms-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173675 ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-16 07:52 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Perhaps by lowering pango version on the spec file this package will be built > for FC3. Nope, the version is not in the spec file but in configure.ac. This plugin _needs_ pango >= 1.8.0 while Core 3 comes with 1.6.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 12:54:06 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 07:54:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512161254.jBGCs6xt017572@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-16 07:54 EST ------- One thing I just forgot: Use %{?dist} in the release field. It helps to differ packages (and appropriate CVS tags) between FC3/FC4/devel . When "release" field contains cvs/svn dates, the incrementation must be: 0.1.20051030%{?dist} --> 0.2.20051030%{?dist} --> 0.3.20051030%{?dist} etc. After the upstream's 0.69 is finished, just use 1%{?dist} --> 2%{?dist} etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 13:29:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 08:29:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174529] Review Request: clearsilver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512161329.jBGDTCFH021591@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clearsilver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174529 ------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2 at verizon.net 2005-12-16 08:28 EST ------- I added --disable-ruby. Now it gets further, but stops here: + find /var/tmp/rpm/clearsilver-0.10.2-2-root-nbecker -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f '{}' ';' + find /var/tmp/rpm/clearsilver-0.10.2-2-root-nbecker -type f -name perllocal.pod -exec rm -f '{}' ';' + find /var/tmp/rpm/clearsilver-0.10.2-2-root-nbecker -type f -name '*.bs' -a -size 0 -exec rm -f '{}' ';' + chmod -R u+w /var/tmp/rpm/clearsilver-0.10.2-2-root-nbecker/usr + install -dm 755 /var/tmp/rpm/clearsilver-0.10.2-2-root-nbecker/usr/lib64/java + mv /var/tmp/rpm/clearsilver-0.10.2-2-root-nbecker/usr/lib64/libclearsilver-jni.so /var/tmp/rpm/clearsilver-0.10.2-2-root-nbecker/usr/lib64/java/libclearsilver-jni.so mv: cannot stat `/var/tmp/rpm/clearsilver-0.10.2-2-root-nbecker/usr/lib64/libclearsilver-jni.so': No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm/rpm-tmp.96805 (%install) Funny, search back for '-jni' shows nothing. Maybe just disable java? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 14:29:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:29:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512161429.jBGETV4m030707@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2005-12-16 09:29 EST ------- Fixed. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 14:32:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:32:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173979] Review Request: Licq - A graphical ICQ Client for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512161432.jBGEWO9O031151@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Licq - A graphical ICQ Client for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173979 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO_REPORTER ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2005-12-16 09:32 EST ------- rpmlint licq-1.3.2-1.i386.rpm W: licq no-documentation W: licq dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/licq/qt-gui/locale/cs.qm cs_CZ.qm The symlink means that the localization of the gui doesn't work, but that's probably some problem with the Makefile. However the documentation should be included - at least the licence must be included (COPYING), but I recommend including other documentation as well. rpmlint licq-kde-1.3.2-1.i386.rpm W: licq-kde non-standard-group Networking/Instant messaging W: licq-kde no-documentation rpmlint licq-osd-1.3.2-1.i386.rpm W: licq-osd non-standard-group Networking/Instant messaging W: licq-osd no-documentation Again the no doc (and licence) problem and also the group should be Applications/Internet probably. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From fedora at camperquake.de Fri Dec 16 17:59:00 2005 From: fedora at camperquake.de (Ralf Ertzinger) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:59:00 +0100 Subject: Orphan fwbuilder In-Reply-To: <200512151501.14544.sgrubb@redhat.com> References: <200512151501.14544.sgrubb@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20051216185900.2cbd6470@nausicaa.camperquake.de> Hi. Steve Grubb wrote: > Does anyone want to take over maintaining fwbuilder? I'll take it if noone else objects. -- On the first day of Christmas my true love sent to me A badly configured newsreader From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 18:35:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:35:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175844] Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512161835.jBGIZqCx009551@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175844 ------- Additional Comments From somlo at cmu.edu 2005-12-16 13:35 EST ------- Fixed spec file, bumped release to 2: Spec Name or Url: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/wmx.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/wmx-6pl1-2.src.rpm the examples aren't downloaded from anywhere -- I added them to give users a template on how to build their menu. Anyway, I reworked that: now, menu examples go into a default systemwide directory (/usr/share/wmx/menu) and the example xinitrc file goes in %doc. Thanks for the comments, and let me know what you think of the changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From orion at cora.nwra.com Fri Dec 16 19:08:22 2005 From: orion at cora.nwra.com (Orion Poplawski) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:08:22 -0700 Subject: rpmlint error In-Reply-To: <200512161255.01752.aportal@univ-montp2.fr> References: <200512161255.01752.aportal@univ-montp2.fr> Message-ID: <43A310A6.8070006@cora.nwra.com> Alain PORTAL wrote: > Hi, > > When I launch rpmlint on the package I've built, I get the following error: > > E: pikdev binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/pikdev ['/usr/lib', > '/usr/lib/qt-3.3/lib', '/usr/X11R6/lib'] > > I don't understand this error, could somebody tell me more about it? > > Regards, > Alain. > The binary specifies a run-time search path for shared libraries. This is a no-no in Fedora. Probably passing --disable-rpath to configure will fix. -- Orion Poplawski System Administrator 303-415-9701 x222 Colorado Research Associates/NWRA FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane, Boulder CO 80301 http://www.co-ra.com From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 19:30:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:30:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173040] Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512161930.jBGJUV6p020365@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173040 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at newmail.ru 2005-12-16 14:30 EST ------- Built on devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 19:35:56 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:35:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175969] New: Review Request: fuse-encfs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175969 Summary: Review Request: fuse-encfs Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: lemenkov at newmail.ru QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SPECS/fuse-encfs.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://lemenkov.newmail.ru/SRPMS/fuse-encfs-1.2.5-1.src.rpm Description: EncFS implements an encrypted filesystem in userspace using FUSE. FUSE provides a Linux kernel module which allows virtual filesystems to be written in userspace. EncFS encrypts all data and filenames in the filesystem and passes access through to the underlying filesystem. Similar to CFS except that it does not use NFS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 19:45:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:45:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175895] Review Request: perl-DBD-XBase - Perl module for reading and writing the dbf files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512161945.jBGJjPhf023520@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-XBase - Perl module for reading and writing the dbf files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175895 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2005-12-16 14:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Basically the package seems OK to me, but I am seeing 2 minor issues with it: > > 1. The package contains /usr/bin/indexdump. > This name ("indexdump") seems too general/generic to me for this specialized > tools to have it in /usr/bin. May-be one should consider to split the > applications out of the perl-module package into a separate application package. > I am not sure. Maybe renaming it to dbfindexdump in case of conflict? The patch would have to modified the Makefile.PL, some parts of the documentation, and at least a test file. > 2. Something it broken with the Makefile. > The ./bin/indexdump being generated inside when running "make" contains > two "#!/usr/bin/perl -w" shebangs instead of one. Corrected. Patched added to CVS (devel branch - tagged and built as release 2). > Anyway, APPROVED Thanks. PS - Still waiting for the FC-4 CVS branch creation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 20:08:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:08:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175844] Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512162008.jBGK8TjV028896@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175844 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at newmail.ru 2005-12-16 15:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Spec Name or Url: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/wmx.spec > SRPM Name or Url: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/wmx-6pl1-2.src.rpm %{__install} -s -D -m 755 wmx %{buildroot}%{_prefix}/X11R6/bin/wmx Devel-branch of FC doesn't have /usr/X11R6 and there isn't a particular reason to use this path if it exists. Change it to: %{__install} -s -D -m 755 wmx %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/wmx You should change %files section in the similar way: %files %defattr(-,root,root) %doc README* UPDATES ANNOYING-BUGS wmx.xsession %{_bindir}/wmx %{_datadir}/%{name} O/T: Have you looked at the configure-log carefully? ... checking whether you're still watching... probably not :-) ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 20:55:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:55:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175566] Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512162055.jBGKtNfi003542@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175566 orion at cora.nwra.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2005-12-16 15:55 EST ------- Are you really getting build errors with development, or just trouble constructing the root it the first place? Rawhide is churning a lot lately. Today I get a missing dependency for mesa-libGL - won't work until that at least is rebuilt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 21:29:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:29:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175566] Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512162129.jBGLTk1m008649@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175566 ------- Additional Comments From adrian at lisas.de 2005-12-16 16:29 EST ------- as development is broken I did test it on 5test1: mock -r fedora-5test1-i386-core kbibtex-0.1.3-2.src.rpm checking for vsnprintf... yes checking for snprintf... yes checking for X... configure: error: Can't find X includes. Please check your installation and add the correct paths! error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.31289 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.31289 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 21:37:47 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:37:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175980] New: Review Request: w3c-libwww Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175980 Summary: Review Request: w3c-libwww Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: dcantrel at redhat.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://people.redhat.com/dcantrel/extras/w3c-libwww.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://people.redhat.com/dcantrel/extras/w3c-libwww-5.4.0-1.src.rpm Description: Libwww is a general-purpose Web API written in C for Unix and Windows (Win32). With a highly extensible and layered API, it can accommodate many different types of applications including clients, robots, etc. The purpose of libwww is to provide a highly optimized HTTP sample implementation as well as other Internet protocols and to serve as a testbed for protocol experiments. Libwww also supports HTTPS, through OpenSSL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 21:44:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:44:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173674] Review Request: xfce4-xkb-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512162144.jBGLi9MF011051@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-xkb-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173674 luya256 at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From luya256 at yahoo.com 2005-12-16 16:44 EST ------- Reviewed, 'mocked' and 'rpmlinted'. Result: set to FE-ACCEPT. Congragulations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 21:44:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:44:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175566] Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512162144.jBGLiFRO011082@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175566 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2005-12-16 16:44 EST ------- Ah, modular X changes! In this case I would argue that once your get sponsorship aproval (Adrian - can you sponsor someone?) that you check in what you have and request an FC-4 (and possibly FC3 if you want to maintain that) branch. Then you can start hacking the devel branch to work with modular X. With kdesvn I ended up putting in a patch to configure to completely remove the configure checks for X includes and libraries as they are now in /usr/include and /usr/lib (or rather, %{_libdir}!). Other possibility is to get upstream to fix admin/acinclude.m4.in or replace with a newer version before initial checkin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 21:45:53 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:45:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175844] Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512162145.jBGLjrL6011373@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175844 ------- Additional Comments From somlo at cmu.edu 2005-12-16 16:45 EST ------- Got rid of X11R6, using %{_bindir} instead: Spec Name or Url: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/wmx.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/wmx-6pl1-3.src.rpm > checking whether you're still watching... probably not :-) yeah, I always thought that was rather cute... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 21:52:50 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:52:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173668] Review Request: xfce4-systemload-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512162152.jBGLqob4013009@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-systemload-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173668 luya256 at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From luya256 at yahoo.com 2005-12-16 16:52 EST ------- reviewed, 'rpmlinted' and 'mocked'. Set status to FE-ACCEPT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From wtogami at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 22:58:49 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:58:49 -0500 Subject: Rebuilding someone elses package In-Reply-To: <20051216093336.GA30172@ryoko.camperquake.de> References: <20051216093336.GA30172@ryoko.camperquake.de> Message-ID: <43A346A9.7080309@redhat.com> Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > Hi. > > Two weeks ago I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174287 > which requests a rebuild of x3270 for the new openssl in bugzilla. So far > there has been no response. > > How are we supposed to handle this? Assuming the package still builds with > the new Openssl (an I have no indication that it would not), can I just > request a rebuild if the maintainer is not responding? > > (This special case is a little more complicated as the package also > Requires: /usr/X11R6/bin/mkfontdir which would have to be changed to > the new path, so it is not a simple "increase release number and push to > build system"). > Just go ahead and make necessary changes in this case. I suppose we we need to make official policy about how to handle this in usual cases. I will bring this to the next FESCO meeting. Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com From petro at mail.ru Fri Dec 16 22:10:20 2005 From: petro at mail.ru (Peter Lemenkov) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:10:20 +0300 Subject: How to gain access to PPC-box? Message-ID: Hello, All! I remember that there was a similar post, but I can't find it. Yesterday I commited chmlib to the cvs, but build for PPC-architecture was failed due to some easy-to-fix error. Easy-to-fix means easy if you're have access to the PPC-box. Here a log: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/1868-chmlib-0.37.4-1.fc5/ppc/build.log My question is: Are there any ways to get shell-access to PPC-based computer? I can't find anything about this at fedoraproject.org/wiki -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. From mpeters at mac.com Fri Dec 16 23:11:19 2005 From: mpeters at mac.com (Michael A. Peters) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:11:19 -0800 Subject: Rebuilding someone elses package In-Reply-To: <43A346A9.7080309@redhat.com> References: <20051216093336.GA30172@ryoko.camperquake.de> <43A346A9.7080309@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1134774679.3032.5.camel@locolhost.localdomain> On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 17:58 -0500, Warren Togami wrote: > > Just go ahead and make necessary changes in this case. I suppose we we > need to make official policy about how to handle this in usual cases. I > will bring this to the next FESCO meeting. Has an e-mail been sent to the maintainer outside of the bugzilla system? Is there a tracker bug for things that must be fixed before fc5 that this can be added to? I would suggest the following if I were at that meeting: 1) make the bug block a tracker. A broken repo tracker would be good. Is there one? 2) Attempt to contact packager outside of bugzilla system if no response has been made in bugzilla system. That would give history of reasonable attempt. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 16 23:17:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:17:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173028] Review Request: ser - SIP Express Router In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512162317.jBGNHfCx024762@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ser - SIP Express Router https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173028 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-16 18:17 EST ------- RFC is actually 3261 Needs a bit of work: (courtesy of fedora-qa script) * RPM name is OK * Source ser-0.9.4_src.tar.gz is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock Needs work: * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake) * Spec file: tag Vendor is forbidden (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#tags) * The BuildRoot must be cleaned at the beginning of %install * rpmlint of ser: init script can be without no replace, and should be executable. But it should not be enabled by default. * rpmlint of ser-mysql: Simply remove the . from the summary. * rpmlint of ser-jabber: Another period to remove. * rpmlint of ser-cpl-c: Yet another period. * rpmlint of ser-pa: Remove . * rpmlint of ser-postgres: Remove . * File list of ser: Move the /usr/etc heirarchy to /etc. * Missing dependancy on service for %preun (package initscripts) * Missing dependancy on chkconfig for %post (package chkconfig) * Missing dependancy on chkconfig for %preun (package chkconfig) * Scriptlets: missing "service" in %postun (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) (in subpackage ser) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 00:40:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168578] Review Request: perl-Class-ErrorHandler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512170040.jBH0exN2004578@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-ErrorHandler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168578 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2005-12-16 19:40 EST ------- I'm sorry, I honestly never saw the APPROVED mail or your last one. Work's been crazy, so I've been in maintenance mode lately instead of checking on new package requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 00:49:07 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:49:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175969] Review Request: fuse-encfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512170049.jBH0n706005547@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-encfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175969 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |wtogami at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-12-16 19:48 EST ------- * Fri Dec 16 2005 Peter Lemenkov 1.2.5-1 - Initial build for FE * Fri Nov 11 2005 Valient Gough In the future please put a space between the last changelog entry and your own. Otherwise looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 01:09:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 20:09:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175895] Review Request: perl-DBD-XBase - Perl module for reading and writing the dbf files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512170109.jBH19Nrb007658@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-XBase - Perl module for reading and writing the dbf files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175895 jpo at di.uminho.pt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2005-12-16 20:09 EST ------- FC-4 build completed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 01:09:36 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 20:09:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175896] Review Request: perl-SQL-Statement - SQL parsing and processing engine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512170109.jBH19aH7007725@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Statement - SQL parsing and processing engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175896 Bug 175896 depends on bug 175895, which changed state. Bug 175895 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-XBase - Perl module for reading and writing the dbf files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175895 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 02:35:19 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:35:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173657] Review Request: xfce4-clipman-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512170235.jBH2ZJoV015892@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-clipman-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173657 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-16 21:35 EST ------- Thanks for the review Kevin. Package build successfully on Core 3 & 4, devel buildsys is stuck atm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 02:37:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:37:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173551] Review Request: xfce4-notes-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512170237.jBH2bPNM016087@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-notes-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173551 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-16 21:37 EST ------- Thanks Kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 02:40:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:40:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173546] Review Request: xfce4-minicmd-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512170240.jBH2eXVF016347@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-minicmd-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173546 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-16 21:40 EST ------- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 02:43:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:43:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173674] Review Request: xfce4-xkb-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512170243.jBH2hno2016793@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-xkb-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173674 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-16 21:43 EST ------- Thanks for reviewing so many of my packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 02:46:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:46:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173668] Review Request: xfce4-systemload-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512170246.jBH2kcVs017152@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-systemload-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173668 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-16 21:46 EST ------- Build successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 02:57:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:57:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173669] Review Request: xfce4-taskbar-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512170257.jBH2vVVI018046@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-taskbar-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173669 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-16 21:57 EST ------- Builds fine. CLOSED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 03:45:19 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 22:45:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168578] Review Request: perl-Class-ErrorHandler In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512170345.jBH3jJ0j026435@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-ErrorHandler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168578 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-16 22:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I'm sorry, I honestly never saw the APPROVED mail or your last one. Should you still be interested in maintaining this package, would you please take ownership of this package (change owners.list accordingly) and issue branch requests for those FC versions you'd like to see implemented? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 06:41:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:41:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174278] Review Request: tcldom - XML DOM bindings for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512170641.jBH6fwBd013691@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tcldom - XML DOM bindings for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174278 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2005-12-17 01:41 EST ------- Many thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 06:42:17 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 01:42:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175463] Review Request: tclsoap - SOAP support for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512170642.jBH6gHZL013738@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tclsoap - SOAP support for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175463 Bug 175463 depends on bug 174278, which changed state. Bug 174278 Summary: Review Request: tcldom - XML DOM bindings for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174278 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 08:20:19 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 03:20:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176006] New: Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176006 Summary: Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: matthias_haase at bennewitz.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.bennewitz.com/rpms/streamtuner.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.bennewitz.com/rpms/streamtuner-0.99.99-2.fc4.src.rpm Description: Streamtuner is a stream directory browser. It offers an intuitive GTK+ 2.0 interface to Internet radio directories such as SHOUTcast and Live365. This is my first package for Fedora Extras, and I'm seeking a sponsor. I have build serveral packages, currently for bluefish (Package Maintainer, upstream) and others more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 10:24:54 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 05:24:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175748] Review Request: cacti In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512171024.jBHAOsmS004077@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cacti https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175748 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-17 05:24 EST ------- Needs work: * Use of buildroot is not consistant (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#UsingBuildRootOptFlags) * No downloadable source. Please give the full URL in the Source tag. * Group Application/System is not valid, it's "Applications/System" (with an s) * /usr/share/cacti/rra/.placeholder and the log file are chmod 750 because of the %attr definition in %files. The files should not be executable, so you should change the lines in %files to : %dir %attr(0755,cacti,cacti) %{_datadir}/%{name}/log/ %attr(0644,cacti,cacti) %{_datadir}/%{name}/log/* %dir %attr(0755,cacti,cacti) %{_datadir}/%{name}/rra/ %attr(0644,cacti,cacti) %{_datadir}/%{name}/rra/.placeholder * Is is necessary to make the log dir non world-readable ? I don't see important information there. Plus, the log file has to be readable by the webserver for the "View Log" function to work (in "System Utilities"). In the above example, I've set the dir 755 and the log file 644. * This is not FHS complient : - move include/config.php in /etc/cacti/config.php - move log/ to /var/log/cacti - move rra to /var/lib/cacti/rra/ And symlink the files back in /usr/share/cacti I would also move scripts/ to /var/lib/cacti/scripts, since it is very common for cacti users to add scripts. What do you think ? * In %prep, use %setup -q to avoid file listing * Please add a logrotate file for the log. Example: /var/log/cacti/cacti.log { monthly notifempty missingok compress create 0644 cacti cacti } * File listed twice: /usr/share/cacti/include/config.php * Missing dependancy on /sbin/service for %postun (package initscripts) * /usr/bin should be changed to %{_bindir} * Why "cp -avx" ? cp -a is enough * Don't hardcode uid 329 in useradd, it may be already used. Just let useradd find an available uid * You need mailx and MTA as Requires(post) because of the mail in %post * Changed Prereq to Requires(pre) * No need for php in %pre, you can remove it from Requires(pre) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sat Dec 17 10:50:41 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 05:50:41 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051217105041.D391E7F7D@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 18 gdesklets-0.35.2-22.fc3 krecipes-0.9.1-1.fc3 libmcrypt-2.5.7-2.fc3 libopensync-0.18-5.fc3 libopensync-plugin-evolution2-0.18-3.fc3 libopensync-plugin-file-0.18-3.fc3 libopensync-plugin-palm-0.18-2.fc3 libopensync-plugin-python-0.18-3.fc3 nethack-vultures-1.11.0-8.fc3 scim-skk-0.5.1-1.fc3 xfce4-clipman-plugin-0.4.1-4.fc3 xfce4-minicmd-plugin-0.3.0-4.fc3 xfce4-modemlights-plugin-0.1.1-3.fc3 xfce4-notes-plugin-0.11.1-2.fc3 xfce4-showdesktop-plugin-0.4.0-4.fc3 xfce4-systemload-plugin-0.3.6-4.fc3 xfce4-taskbar-plugin-0.2.2-4.fc3 xfce4-xkb-plugin-0.3.2-4.fc3 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sat Dec 17 11:20:39 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 06:20:39 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051217112039.C31D47F7D@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 21 gdesklets-0.35.2-22.fc4 gnome-sudoku-0.4.0-1.fc4 gnome-sudoku-0.4.0-2.fc4 gnome-sudoku-0.4.0-3.fc4 kdesvn-0.7.1-2.fc4 libmcrypt-2.5.7-2.fc4 meanwhile-1.0.1-1.fc4 nethack-vultures-1.11.0-8.fc4 perl-DBD-XBase-0.241-2.fc4 scim-skk-0.5.1-1.fc4 sobby-0.2.0-2.fc4 tcldom-3.1-2.fc4 xfce4-clipman-plugin-0.4.1-4.fc4 xfce4-minicmd-plugin-0.3.0-4.fc4 xfce4-modemlights-plugin-0.1.1-3.fc4 xfce4-notes-plugin-0.11.1-2.fc4 xfce4-showdesktop-plugin-0.4.0-4.fc4 xfce4-systemload-plugin-0.3.6-4.fc4 xfce4-taskbar-plugin-0.2.2-4.fc4 xfce4-xkb-plugin-0.3.2-4.fc4 yumex-0.44-1.0.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sat Dec 17 11:45:28 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 06:45:28 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051217114528.87E667F7D@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 13 bochs-2.2.1-2.fc5 fuse-encfs-1.2.5-1.fc5 gnome-sudoku-0.4.0-1.fc5 l2tpd-0.69-0.2.20051030.fc5 libmcrypt-2.5.7-2.fc5 meanwhile-1.0.1-1.fc5 mod_security-1.9.1-2.fc5 nedit-5.5-6 nethack-vultures-1.11.0-8.fc5 nmh-1.1-15.fc5 perl-Class-ErrorHandler-0.01-2.fc5 perl-DBD-XBase-0.241-2.fc5 uim-1.0.0-0.1.alpha.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 11:59:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 06:59:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176006] Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512171159.jBHBxwmZ016059@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176006 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-17 06:59 EST ------- Not a review, just some comments: %define desktop_vendor endur %define name streamtuner %define version 0.99.99 %define release 2.fc4 %define prefix /usr Lose all that. use the real Name / Version / Release in the appropriate places Do not define prefix - do not define desktop_vendor -=- Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Should be full url to the upstream tarball Obsoletes: streamtuner-live365, streamtuner-local, streamtuner-xiph Obsoletes: streamtuner-python Why the Obsoletes? I'm assuming because there are or were packages with those names on upstream website? If so that's probably fine - but then you need to add provides for them. --- %build CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" %configure --prefix=%{prefix} make %{?_smp_mflags} should be %build %configure make %{?_smp_mflags} You don't need to define CFLAGS - rpm will do that. %configure sets the prefix for you --- %makeinstall There's not %install section. You need %install rm -rf %{buildroot} Then you can use %makeinstall I prefer make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install sometimes %makeinstall results in some wrong path stuff, but it sometimes is OK. desktop-file-install --vendor %{desktop_vendor} --delete-original \ should be desktop-file-install --vendor=fedora \ -=- %find_lang %{name} That means you need to BuildRequires: gettext -=- %files -f %{name}.lang %defattr(-, root, root) %{_bindir}/%{name} %dir %{_libdir}/%{name} %dir %{_libdir}/%{name}/plugins %{_libdir}/%{name}/plugins/*.so %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/%{name}/* %dir %{_datadir}/omf/%{name} %{_datadir}/omf/%{name}/* %{_datadir}/applications/%{desktop_vendor}-%{name}.desktop %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/* %dir %{_datadir}/help %{_datadir}/help/* %doc AUTHORS COPYING INSTALL NEWS README TODO can be simplified greatly. Usually %doc goes at top - and usually INSTALL insn't packaged. Make sure the other files aren't empty as well (NEWS often is, though not always) %files -f %{name}.lang %defattr(-, root, root, -) %doc AUTHORS COPYING NEWS README TODO %{_bindir}/%{name} %{_libdir}/%{name}/ %{_datadir}/%{name}/ %{_datadir}/omf/%{name}/ %{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/* %{_datadir}/help/ -=- %{_datadir}/help/ though is probably wrong. -=- Also - all your summary lines end in a . They shouldn't. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 12:04:04 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 07:04:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176006] Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512171204.jBHC44Kx016383@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176006 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-17 07:03 EST ------- desktop-file-install --vendor %{desktop_vendor} --delete-original \ should be desktop-file-install --vendor=fedora \ Note that you don't need to --delete-original because the original isn't installed in the buildroot (you can, but not need to) also - noticed %define release 2.fc4 When you do it - use %{?dist} tag - ie Release: 2%{?dist} The build system will have dist defined properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 15:37:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 10:37:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512171537.jBHFbG0e002206@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 pmatilai at laiskiainen.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pmatilai at laiskiainen.org ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at laiskiainen.org 2005-12-17 10:36 EST ------- I'd rather see smart-gui than smart-gtk as the GUI package name - it describes the functionality of the package instead of what toolkit it happens to use for a particular purpose - smart-gui is already in use by Dag & Axel If it some day gains a separate KDE interface then by all means split it to smart-gui-gtk and smart-gui-kde or similar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 16:23:10 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 11:23:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173111] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512171623.jBHGNAtC007132@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173111 ------- Additional Comments From alexl at users.sourceforge.net 2005-12-17 11:22 EST ------- This spec file may need to be reworked to use the new modular X BuildRequires for the devel branch or somesuch tweaks. According to the build system it failed a build in the development branch: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=1947 http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/1947-gdesklets-0.35.2-22.fc5/ppc/root.log The error: Error: Missing Dependency: libdrm.so.1 is needed by package mesa-libGL Indicates that there are some packages requirements that aren't being met by the BuildRequires in the devel branch on the ppc architecture. They either need to be added, or ppc needs to be excluded from the build. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/NewPackageProcess is ambiguous on whether a Review Request can be closed NEXTRELEASE before a successful build in the devel branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 16:36:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 11:36:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173111] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512171636.jBHGaC0Z008227@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173111 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-17 11:36 EST ------- I got that same issue when yum updating my rawhide system last night. libdrm (scary name, btw ;) has been updated and no longer provides libdrm.so.1 - but mesa-libGL has not yet been rebuilt against it. Requesting the build again after mesa-libGL has been rebuilt may be all that is needed. I agree though that it should probably not be closed until it does actually build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 17:27:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 12:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175278] Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512171727.jBHHR2UZ012416@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175278 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-17 12:26 EST ------- Just one small problem: "Requires: gift" is redundant, the package already depends on libgift.so.0 (you should remove it in case you split the library out of the main package one day) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 17:27:20 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 12:27:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175279] Review Request: gift-openft: Openft plugin for giFT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512171727.jBHHRK9b012486@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gift-openft: Openft plugin for giFT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175279 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-17 12:27 EST ------- You probably mean http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/gift-openft-0.2.1.6-1.src.rpm Just one small problem: "Requires: gift" is redundant, the package already depends on libgift.so.0 (you should remove it in case you split the library out of the main package one day) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 18:14:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:14:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176021] New: Review Request: bwidget - extended widget set for Tcl/Tk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176021 Summary: Review Request: bwidget - extended widget set for Tcl/Tk Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: wart at kobold.org QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/bwidget.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/bwidget-1.7.0-2.src.rpm Description: A popular extended widget set for Tcl/Tk This is a pretty simple noarch package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 18:25:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:25:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175748] Review Request: cacti In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512171825.jBHIPCTP018152@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cacti https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175748 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2005-12-17 13:25 EST ------- I don't disagree with any of these. I'll post the changes soon. I guess I was being a little loverly parrinoid about the log files. Going through my own I haven't seen anything too important. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 18:57:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 13:57:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173035] Review Request: chmlib - Library for dealing with ITSS/CHM format files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512171857.jBHIvc2N020840@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chmlib - Library for dealing with ITSS/CHM format files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173035 ------- Additional Comments From lemenkov at newmail.ru 2005-12-17 13:57 EST ------- Failed build for PPC arch. I haven't access to the PPC-computer, so I can't find out what's wrong exactly. Log: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/1868-chmlib-0.37.4-1.fc5/ppc/build.log Error was generated by #error-directive at that string "src/chm_lib.c:186". If we look there, we'll find this piece of code: ========================================================= /* i386, 32-bit, Windows */ #ifdef WIN32 typedef unsigned char UChar; typedef __int16 Int16; typedef unsigned __int16 UInt16; typedef __int32 Int32; typedef unsigned __int32 UInt32; typedef __int64 Int64; typedef unsigned __int64 UInt64; /* I386, 32-bit, non-Windows */ /* Sparc */ /* MIPS */ /* PPC */ #elif __i386__ || __sun || __sgi || __ppc__ typedef unsigned char UChar; typedef short Int16; typedef unsigned short UInt16; typedef long Int32; typedef unsigned long UInt32; typedef long long Int64; typedef unsigned long long UInt64; /* x86-64 */ /* Note that these may be appropriate for other 64-bit machines. */ #elif __x86_64__ typedef unsigned char UChar; typedef short Int16; typedef unsigned short UInt16; typedef int Int32; typedef unsigned int UInt32; typedef long Int64; typedef unsigned long UInt64; #else /* yielding an error is preferable to yielding incorrect behavior */ #error "Please define the sized types for your platform in chm_lib.c" #endif ========================================================= Looks like wrong arch-definition at that place: > #elif __i386__ || __sun || __sgi || __ppc__ What arch-macro defined by gcc at PPC-box? __ppc32__? __ppc64__? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 19:18:42 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 14:18:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170131] Review Request: php-extras - Additional PHP modules from the standard PHP distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512171918.jBHJIg3I022794@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-extras - Additional PHP modules from the standard PHP distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170131 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-17 14:18 EST ------- There is php-5.1.1 in FC5/devel now, which no more have "fam" module and built now with system sqlite (>= 3.0.0). - don't build "fam" module by default for FC4 (as it will disappear in FC5) - drop "sqlite" for FC5/devel, as it use bundled sqlite v2, but newest php now use system's sqlite v3 (for the pdo-sqlite module), the using of both versions leads to incompatibilities. - don't build "sqlite" for FC4 by default (as it will be not present in FC5). (Thanks to Tom 'spot' Callaway for the testing under rawhide). New SPECS/SRPMS: FC3: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/php-extras/php-extras.spec.fc3 http://dmitry.butskoy.name/php-extras/php-extras-4.3.11-2.src.rpm FC4: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/php-extras/php-extras.spec.fc4 http://dmitry.butskoy.name/php-extras/php-extras-5.0.4-2.src.rpm FC5: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/php-extras/php-extras.spec.fc5 http://dmitry.butskoy.name/php-extras/php-extras-5.1.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 19:36:13 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 14:36:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173035] Review Request: chmlib - Library for dealing with ITSS/CHM format files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512171936.jBHJaDRL025139@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: chmlib - Library for dealing with ITSS/CHM format files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173035 ------- Additional Comments From t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch 2005-12-17 14:36 EST ------- Instead of using architecture defines, why don't you just #include and then typedef uint32_t UInt32; ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 19:55:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 14:55:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512171955.jBHJtqUf027803@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2005-12-17 14:55 EST ------- Are there any blockers left for this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 20:16:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:16:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175844] Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512172016.jBHKGcoe030697@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175844 jeff at ultimateevil.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jeff at ultimateevil.org ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ultimateevil.org 2005-12-17 15:16 EST ------- I don't think it's necessary to include the package name in either Summary or %description. For example, Summary: a really simple window manager for X And %description should begin with a capital: A really simple... Next, it would be nice to include the appropriate facilities for this window manager to show up in the xdm list of available sessions. This can be done by adding text files to /etc/X11/[g]dm/Sessions. If it's gdm, the file would simply be wmx, but if it's dm, it's wmx.desktop. I'm looking at WindowMaker as an example: $ cat /etc/X11/gdm/Sessions/WindowMaker #!/bin/sh exec /etc/X11/xdm/Xsession wmaker $ cat /etc/X11/dm/Sessions/WindowMaker.desktop [Desktop Entry] Encoding=UTF-8 Name=WindowMaker Comment=Start Window Maker Exec=wmaker Type=Application [Window Manager] SessionManaged=true Finally, in %files, I prefer to use %{_bindir}/* instead of naming the binary. Since this is only one in this case, it's up to you. If the package ever grows to include more binaries, it might be nice just to have the wildcard so there is less to change in the future. It's just a suggestion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From aportal at univ-montp2.fr Sat Dec 17 20:31:01 2005 From: aportal at univ-montp2.fr (Alain PORTAL) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:31:01 +0100 Subject: rpmlint error In-Reply-To: <43A310A6.8070006@cora.nwra.com> References: <200512161255.01752.aportal@univ-montp2.fr> <43A310A6.8070006@cora.nwra.com> Message-ID: <200512172131.04210.aportal@univ-montp2.fr> Le Vendredi 16 D?cembre 2005 20:08, Orion Poplawski a ?crit : > The binary specifies a run-time search path for shared libraries. This > is a no-no in Fedora. Probably passing --disable-rpath to configure > will fix. Yes, that fix. But I fix something I don't understand... Thank for your answer. Your sincerely Alain. -- Les pages de manuel Linux en fran?ais : http://manpagesfr.free.fr -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 20:31:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:31:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176026] New: Review Request: pikdev:IDE for development of PICmicro based application (under Linux/KDE) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176026 Summary: Review Request: pikdev:IDE for development of PICmicro based application (under Linux/KDE) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: aportal at univ-montp2.fr QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/4/SPECS/pikdev.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://linuxelectronique.free.fr/download/fedora/4/SRPMS/pikdev-0.8.2-1.src.rpm Description: PiKdev is a simple IDE dedicated to the development of PIC based applications under KDE. Features: - Integrated editor - Project management - Integrated programming engine for 12, 14 and 16 bits PIC (flash or EPROM technology) - Support for parallel and serial port programmers - KDE compliant look-and-feel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 21:49:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:49:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174320] Review Request: gcdmaster - Gnome Audio CD mastering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512172149.jBHLnND8006143@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcdmaster - Gnome Audio CD mastering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174320 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2005-12-17 16:49 EST ------- Michael, thanks for your review. http://www.poolshark.org/src/gcdmaster.spec http://www.poolshark.org/src/gcdmaster-1.2.1-2.src.rpm I'll import shortly. I removed the explicit disabling of MP3 support so that configure will fall back on autodetection. That means that if you compile the src.rpm with libmad-devel installed, mp3 support will be built in (that support is "neutral" wrt packaging, it doesn't add files to the package or anything like that). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 22:17:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:17:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174320] Review Request: gcdmaster - Gnome Audio CD mastering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512172217.jBHMHdSI008260@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcdmaster - Gnome Audio CD mastering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174320 ------- Additional Comments From denis at poolshark.org 2005-12-17 17:17 EST ------- http://www.poolshark.org/src/gcdmaster.spec http://www.poolshark.org/src/gcdmaster-1.2.1-3.src.rpm Damn i should finish my coffee before i do these things. Mp3 support is obviously not RPM-neutral since you might accidentally tie the built RPM to libmad.so.0 if libmad-devel happens to be installed. I changed my mind here and implement your idea. Compiling with "rpmbuild --define '_with_mp3 1'" will enable the mp3 support auto-detection. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 22:41:43 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:41:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175282] Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512172241.jBHMfhjq009706@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175282 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-17 17:41 EST ------- Needs work: * The package should contain the text of the license (wiki: PackageReviewGuidelines) * The package contains a libtool archive file (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#StaticLibraries) Apollon seems to work without it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 17 23:18:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 18:18:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512172318.jBHNIIaD012503@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2005-12-17 18:18 EST ------- None (that I can think of), except for one line in the package description extending too long. That is fixed by the files below. ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/nact/nautilus-actions.spec ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/nact/nautilus-actions-0.99-3.src.rpm Unless Brian spot anything new, the package should be good enough now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 00:02:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 19:02:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512180002.jBI02nA9016865@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2005-12-17 19:02 EST ------- Since I'm not running Rawhide yet, I didn't take this bug for a formal review (thats why I left it as FE-NEW). Another reviewer will need to verify that this package runs as expected before, and then they can give a final approval. Of course, until the mesa-libGL package is fixed in Rawhide, they won't be able to build this package in Mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 01:24:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 20:24:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174320] Review Request: gcdmaster - Gnome Audio CD mastering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512180124.jBI1OwjY022533@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcdmaster - Gnome Audio CD mastering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174320 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-17 20:24 EST ------- Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 03:46:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:46:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167983] Review Request: evolution-caldav In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512180346.jBI3k9N0032573@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: evolution-caldav https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167983 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2005-12-17 22:45 EST ------- NEEDSWORK MD5Sums: 017b3739cc1a568708978344d48fc6f5 evolution-caldav-2.3.99.2.tar.bz2 Good: * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * No deprecated fields used * All desired features are enabled Needswork: * Specified Source URL is not canonical. * Missing Documentation: Add COPYING file. * Requires for evolution, evolution-data-server, and libsoup can be dropped since the BR should pull these in. * Rpmlint errors (ran against binary provided by you): E: evolution-caldav devel-dependency evolution-data-server-devel W: evolution-caldav no-documentation Minor: * Buildroot lacks certain elements %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) is the preferred value. Refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#head-c2cfbc6be2860c5d2634d06714098e1560667de6 * Is "[ -n "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" -a "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != / ]" really necessary in the %install & %clean sections? Note: * I'm unable to build this currently in Mock, due to mesa-libGL being broken in Rawhide. Once this has been fixed, I'll try to build this package again. Also, since I'm not on Rawhide yet, someone else will need to verify that this package runs as expected. At a minimum, at least some of the reviewing needed for this package is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 05:59:54 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:59:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175748] Review Request: cacti In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512180559.jBI5xsRQ010000@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cacti https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175748 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2005-12-18 00:59 EST ------- I've made these updates. Couple of issues: Simply running config.php out of /etc/ does not work as there are includes that fail, and copying the entire include directory seems inapproperate. I could write a patch? In the meantime I made a link from the config.php to /etc/cacti/config.php so it can at least be found there. Any thoughts? I'm also curious about others thoughts on running this as a Cacti user. Would it be more approperate to just run it as Apache? Either way the spec and srpm are both updated and in their original spots: Spec Url: http://preview.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/cacti/cacti.spec SRPM Url: http://preview.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/cacti/cacti-0.8.6g-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 06:07:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:07:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175748] Review Request: cacti In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512180607.jBI67Oas010402@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cacti https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175748 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-12-18 01:07 EST ------- When you update a SRPM, please always increment the Release number, do not keep it the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 07:37:53 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:37:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170978] Review Request: nomadsync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512180737.jBI7brw0016068@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nomadsync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170978 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2005-12-18 02:37 EST ------- I fixed these things, but no cigar, because now it doesn't compile under GCC 4.0.2 so more things need to be done... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 07:39:43 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 02:39:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170978] Review Request: nomadsync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512180739.jBI7dh3D016162@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nomadsync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170978 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2005-12-18 02:39 EST ------- Hm the package is set into review, but who reviews it? It is still assigned to Greg, which is also default. Greg, is it really you who review this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 12:24:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 07:24:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176006] Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512181224.jBICOdhA019662@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176006 ------- Additional Comments From matthias_haase at bennewitz.com 2005-12-18 07:24 EST ------- Hi, Michael... ...the required things are changed now. You'll find the changed files here... Spec Name or Url: http://www.bennewitz.com/rpms/streamtuner.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.bennewitz.com/rpms/streamtuner-0.99.99-3.src.rpm -- Regards Matthias -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 12:27:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 07:27:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170978] Review Request: nomadsync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512181227.jBICRFEN019933@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nomadsync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170978 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |mpeters at mac.com ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-18 07:27 EST ------- I think I set it to review and forgot to set it to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 13:32:42 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 08:32:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176006] Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512181332.jBIDWgPY024561@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176006 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-18 08:32 EST ------- Need to add the following BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils Otherwise it won't build in mock. [mpeters at utility result]$ ls *.rpm && rpmlint *.rpm streamtuner-0.99.99-3.fc4.i386.rpm streamtuner-0.99.99-3.fc4.src.rpm streamtuner-debuginfo-0.99.99-3.fc4.i386.rpm streamtuner-devel-0.99.99-3.fc4.i386.rpm E: streamtuner obsolete-not-provided streamtuner-live365 E: streamtuner obsolete-not-provided streamtuner-local E: streamtuner obsolete-not-provided streamtuner-xiph E: streamtuner obsolete-not-provided streamtuner-python E: streamtuner useless-explicit-provides live365.so E: streamtuner useless-explicit-provides local.so W: streamtuner-devel no-documentation [mpeters at utility result]$ Since you have the obsoletes set on those packages, it needs to Provide them as well. The explicit .so provides should probably be removed. The warning on the devel package - if there isn't any developer doc to package, it can be ignored. -=- >From the build.log of the mock build I did: Installation directories --bindir /usr/bin --datadir /usr/share --libdir /usr/lib --includedir /usr/include Features --enable-shoutcast yes --enable-live365 yes --enable-xiph no (libxml not found) --enable-local yes --enable-local-metadata yes --enable-python yes I suspect you need to add libxml2-devel to the BuildRequires -=- Other than those issues, it looks good. Oh - one more thing - in the %changelog - * Sun Dec 18 2005 Matthias Haase - 0.99.99-3.fc4 You should drop the .fc4 from the changelog. That's provided by the %{?dist} tag - so the same spec file could be used to build for fc3/4/5 (assuming it will build on all of them) -=- Please note that I'm happy to informally review this package, it looks likes a good addition - but I am not able to sponsor people - so a reviewer who is able to do so still is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 15:20:20 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:20:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175748] Review Request: cacti In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512181520.jBIFKKRl032221@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cacti https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175748 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-18 10:20 EST ------- > Simply running config.php out of /etc/ does not work as there are includes > that fail, and copying the entire include directory seems inapproperate. I > could write a patch? If it's very easy and obvious, yes, write a patch please. Users should not have to edit configuration files in /usr/share > I'm also curious about others thoughts on running this as a Cacti user. Would > it be more approperate to just run it as Apache? You mean the cron job ? I think it's best not to run it as the apache user, so that the apache user does not have write access to the RRA files in case of compromise (and there have been such vulnerabilities in cacti's history) * in %pre : /usr/sbin -> %{_sbindir} * /var -> %{_localstatedir} in the logrotate file * mailx and MTA should be in Requires(post) * /sbin/service should be in Requires(postun) * Using %doc in %files does the copying of files, so you don't have to do it in %install Minor: * the scripts don't have to be owned by the cacti user, but that's not a problem (it just spits out more warnings in rpmlint) * you don't _have_ to use %{__install}, %{__mkdir}, %{__cp} and %{__chmod}, using install, mkdir, etc... is enough. Do what you prefer, it's up to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From fedora at camperquake.de Sun Dec 18 16:32:54 2005 From: fedora at camperquake.de (Ralf Ertzinger) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:32:54 +0100 Subject: Taking over maintainership for fwbuilder Message-ID: <20051218163254.GA11400@ryoko.camperquake.de> Hi. Since there seem to be no glaring objections I will be taking over maintainership for fwbuilder and libfwbuilder from the current maintainer. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 17:23:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:23:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175748] Review Request: cacti In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512181723.jBIHNPpm009222@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cacti https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175748 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2005-12-18 12:23 EST ------- Spec Url: http://preview.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/cacti/cacti.spec SRPM Url: http://preview.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/cacti/cacti-0.8.6g-3.noarch.rpm I've updated many of those changes (including minor). I ended up taking the mail out of the RPM all together, I don't remember getting emails from other packages saying "hey configure me here" I've taken the database config portion out of the config.php file and placed it in /etc/cacti/db.php It seems like nothing else in config.php would need to be edited for normal use. Thanks for all your help on this, I plan on submitting more packages in the future so feel free to straighten me out on things that are not best practice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 18:03:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:03:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175748] Review Request: cacti In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512181803.jBII3wj0013451@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cacti https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175748 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-18 13:03 EST ------- > I ended up taking the mail out of the RPM all together, I don't > remember getting emails from other packages saying "hey configure me here" Agreed. Seemed "unnatural" to me too. > I've taken the database config portion out of the config.php file and placed > it in /etc/cacti/db.php It seems like nothing else in config.php would need > to be edited for normal use. Very nice. There are a few additional config vars for some HTML colors in config.php, but we can ignore this. Actually, I wish upstream had splitted the db config out of config.php. Could you submit your patch upstream (with the /etc/cacti/db.php paths replaced by include/db.php) ? A few last things : * remove /sbin/service from Requires (it's already in Requires(postun)) * in %install, first you %__install the .placeholder file, then you empty it with echo. Why ? I think that is file is here just to prevent winzip from not including the rra dir, so you should not bother about it (I think you can even remove it entirely). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 18:50:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:50:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175840] Review Request: xmlrpc-c -- A lightweight RPC library based on XML and HTTP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512181850.jBIIowf1016385@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-c -- A lightweight RPC library based on XML and HTTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175840 enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-18 13:50 EST ------- thx for the approval and the comments. I added also a Requires: for 'curl-devel' because it is needed for client functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 19:01:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:01:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512181901.jBIJ1d8I017183@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jspaleta at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2005-12-18 14:01 EST ------- Got the build in mock against rawhide today to actually start. It did not compile however. Build.log reports: checking for glib-2.0 >= 2.4.0 gthread-2.0 >= 2.4.0 gmodule-2.0 >= 2.4.0 gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0 libglade-2.0 >= 2.4.0 libgnome-2.0 >= 2.7.0 libgnomeui-2.0 >= 2.7.0 gconf-2.0 >= 2.8.0 libnautilus-extension >= 2.8.0... Package xdmcp was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `xdmcp.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'xdmcp', required by 'X11', not found configure: error: Library requirements ( glib-2.0 >= 2.4.0 gthread-2.0 >= 2.4.0 gmodule-2.0 >= 2.4.0 gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0 libglade-2.0 >= 2.4.0 libgnome-2.0 >= 2.7.0 libgnomeui-2.0 >= 2.7.0 gconf-2.0 >= 2.8.0 libnautilus-extension >= 2.8.0) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.29345 (%build) you definitely need libXdmcp-devel as a buildrequires I've added that and the build completes. I'll see if the resulting packages work on my rawhide box -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 19:12:13 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 14:12:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512181912.jBIJCDW9017955@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2005-12-18 14:12 EST ------- Okay my nautilus-actions-0.99-4 binary seems to work on my rawhide box just fine. The preference dialog works.. and my test actions show up in the right click context menu. Getting the buildrequires fixed as per the last comment seems to be the only thing left to do. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Sun Dec 18 19:51:39 2005 From: Jochen at herr-schmitt.de (Jochen Schmitt) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:51:39 +0100 Subject: Best Practice for retagging tags Message-ID: <0MKwpI-1Eo4ZS3BNd-0007Ek@mrelayeu.kundenserver.de> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, in the last week I have the following problem: After I have taged a checked in version of a package for rebuiting, I found out, the I have forgotten to add a new patch into the cvs reporsitory. So I want to ask how I should handle this case. Becouse I didn't found a better solution I have to increase the relase count into the spec file, so I could genereate a new tag after I have checked in my changes. It will be happy for any answer. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.0.2 (Build 2424) iQA/AwUBQ6W9y09gByurcX4MEQJZjQCgk1fhS5+36MfXyaC7jHXqTyp5OuAAn1Yb oDHO0Q1MRlCrvAK0aQWkQFwf =TKzB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From denis at poolshark.org Sun Dec 18 20:08:04 2005 From: denis at poolshark.org (Denis Leroy) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:08:04 -0800 Subject: Best Practice for retagging tags In-Reply-To: <0MKwpI-1Eo4ZS3BNd-0007Ek@mrelayeu.kundenserver.de> References: <0MKwpI-1Eo4ZS3BNd-0007Ek@mrelayeu.kundenserver.de> Message-ID: <43A5C1A4.80703@poolshark.org> Jochen Schmitt wrote: > in the last week I have the following problem: > > After I have taged a checked in version of a package for > rebuiting, I found out, the I have forgotten to add a new patch > into the cvs reporsitory. > > So I want to ask how I should handle this case. Becouse I didn't > found a better solution I have to increase the relase count into > the spec file, so I could genereate a new tag after I have > checked in my changes. Tags can be moved with the -F options (see cvs tag --help), though obviously you want to use that with care... -denis From ville.skytta at iki.fi Sun Dec 18 20:23:22 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:23:22 +0200 Subject: Creating branches in CVS In-Reply-To: <200512181828.jBIISLQ5018883@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> References: <200512181828.jBIISLQ5018883@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1134937402.20111.4.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 13:28 -0500, Enrico Scholz wrote: > Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/xmlrpc-c/FC-4 > In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18866/FC-4 > > Added Files: > xmlrpc-c.spec xmlrpc-c-1.04-namespace.patch > xmlrpc-c-1.04-libxml2.patch sources Makefile .cvsignore > Log Message: > added FC-4 branch (copied from devel/) I thought packagers cannot do this properly theirselves but are supposed to ask a CVS admin to take care of it at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded instead. Has something changed? From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 20:42:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:42:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512182042.jBIKgQPk025641@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-18 15:42 EST ------- FYI: today's Rawhide metadata (or something) seems to put smart into some kind of loop in the "Saving cache..." phase. I don't know if it ever finishes but it apparently consumes all available memory here, and I can't really "wait and see" ATM... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 21:41:19 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:41:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175748] Review Request: cacti In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512182141.jBILfJaT029724@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cacti https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175748 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2005-12-18 16:41 EST ------- These changes are ready, I've submitted an include/db.php patch to the Cacti team. Also while looking for their bug system I found 4 patches for 0.8.6g and have included them in this release. Spec Url: http://preview.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/cacti/cacti.spec SRPM Url: http://preview.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/cacti/cacti-0.8.6g-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 21:55:55 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:55:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175969] Review Request: fuse-encfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512182155.jBILttBl031641@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-encfs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175969 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2005-12-18 16:55 EST ------- Peter, thanks for doing this package. It was on my wishlist... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 18 22:00:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:00:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170978] Review Request: nomadsync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512182200.jBIM0xQv032018@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nomadsync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170978 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2005-12-18 17:00 EST ------- OK thanks Michael, I'll get back as soon as I find a proper patch for GCC 4.0.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 01:16:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:16:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176071] New: Review Request: silgraphite Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176071 Summary: Review Request: silgraphite Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: mpeters at mac.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://mpeters.us/silgraphite/silgraphite.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://mpeters.us/silgraphite/silgraphite-2.0.0-0.10.svn106.src.rpm Description: Graphite is a project within SIL's scripts and software dev groups to provide cross-platform rendering for complex writing systems. Graphite is intended to serve as the principal non-Roman renderer for the FieldWorks package, the new generation of linguistic and translation tools under development within SIL. We also want to make the Graphite library available to any software developer who is working to develop multilingual text processing applications. URL with Demonstration: http://mpeters.us/silgraphite/ -=- Targeting FC5 only - the pango wrapper needs fontconfig too new for FC4, the library itself builds on FC4 but AFAIK nothing exists for Linux that wants to make use of the library itself. -=- There's an rpmlint error on the src.rpm - E: silgraphite hardcoded-library-path in ../../lib/.libs That's because the pango wrapper uses the silgraphite headers/libs - so to build it in same packaging run, I did the following: pushd wrappers/pangographite sh autogen.sh export PKG_CONFIG_PATH=../../:$PKG_CONFIG_PATH export CXXFLAGS="%{optflags} -I../../include -L../../lib/.libs" %configure --disable-static make %{?_smp_mflags} popd If there's a better way to do it such that rpmlint is happy, I don't know it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From wtogami at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 04:33:04 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:33:04 -0500 Subject: FE5 buildsys status Message-ID: <43A63800.1040303@redhat.com> I suspect that FE5 buildsys should be working now. The Mesa dep was broken for a few days, but that is now solved in rawhide. Let me know directly if you see any other broken rawhide dep problems affecting the Extras buildsys in the future. Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 06:13:20 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:13:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173553] Review Request: xfce4-websearch-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512190613.jBJ6DKsl007970@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-websearch-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173553 luya256 at yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From luya256 at yahoo.com 2005-12-19 01:13 EST ------- Set to FE-ACCEPT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 06:18:10 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:18:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175494] Review Request: new In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512190618.jBJ6IApG008316@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175494 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-19 01:18 EST ------- Builds and works. rpmlint complains about: E: new non-executable-script /usr/share/new/templates/missing/default 0644 E: new non-executable-script /usr/share/new/templates/py/default 0644 E: new non-executable-script /usr/share/new/templates/sh/default 0644 W: new-devel no-documentation but these can be ignored, templates aren't executable. devel subpackage included, no .la files. Remainder of review in comment 2. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 06:27:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 01:27:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173553] Review Request: xfce4-websearch-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512190627.jBJ6R0Qi009285@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-websearch-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173553 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-19 01:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Set to FE-ACCEPT. Please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewGuidelines#head-df547f180bcbcf2f2dd5d779246792ed70d0fa0b As a reviewer, you are supposed to own the bug (assign the PR to you). Pushing package back to FE-NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 07:54:47 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:54:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175748] Review Request: cacti In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512190754.jBJ7slQF017657@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cacti https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175748 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-19 02:54 EST ------- * in the cron job, replace /usr/bin by %{_bindir} * to make it clear that the patches come from upstream, please give the full url (ex: http://www.cacti.net/downloads/patches/0.8.6g/short_open_tag_parse_error.patch) They won't start with "cacti-0.8.6g-", but it is more important to be able to verify them against upstream. * drop the empty %build section * concerning the apache restart in the scriptlets : 1. we want to condrestart apache on install, in order for our new cacti.conf to be taken into account. 2. we want to condrestart apache on upgrade, in case we changed cacti.conf 3. we want to condrestart apache on uninstall, so that apache sees that the cacti.conf file has been removed. For 1 we need a post scriptlet like this : %post if [ $1 == 1 ]; then /sbin/service httpd condrestart >/dev/null 2>&1 fi We can combine 2 and 3 into a simple %postun scriptlet without tests : %postun /sbin/service httpd condrestart >/dev/null 2>&1 See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets for more info on which tests to run We are having a larger problem now. SELinux blocks httpd from accessing /var/log and /var/lib. The RRAs are correctly created by the poller script, but can't be seen in the web interface. I'm posting in fedora-selinux-list to get advice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 08:32:22 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:32:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169927] Review Request: scim-fcitx - Chinese IMEngine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512190832.jBJ8WMpB021503@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-fcitx - Chinese IMEngine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169927 ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2005-12-19 03:32 EST ------- Thank you for the careful review. I uploaded a new package which should fix all the points you found: http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/scim-fcitx-3.1.1-1.1.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/petersen/extras/scim-fcitx.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 08:42:11 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:42:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176006] Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512190842.jBJ8gB4I022394@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176006 ------- Additional Comments From matthias_haase at bennewitz.com 2005-12-19 03:42 EST ------- I have done some cleanups on the specfile. Again you'll find the changed files here... Spec Name or Url: http://www.bennewitz.com/rpms/streamtuner.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.bennewitz.com/rpms/streamtuner-0.99.99-4.fc4.src.rpm Because I have defined %{dist} in ~/.rpmmacros, the filename of the source rpm contains 'fc4' now. And I have considered including streamtuner in extras because some people have ask about this, already using my Fedora rpm from upstream, in order to make it easier to install (yum install streamtuner). Thanks for your review, I'll change some other specfiles later too, following the provided strict style. -- Regards Matthias -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 10:37:17 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:37:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173979] Review Request: Licq - A graphical ICQ Client for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191037.jBJAbH7m004138@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Licq - A graphical ICQ Client for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173979 pvrabec at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From pvrabec at redhat.com 2005-12-19 05:37 EST ------- fixed, need 4 review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 11:00:21 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:00:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173111] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191100.jBJB0Lfc008093@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173111 ------- Additional Comments From luya256 at yahoo.com 2005-12-19 06:00 EST ------- Now fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 11:02:47 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:02:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176006] Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191102.jBJB2lIf008582@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176006 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-19 06:02 EST ------- Excellent - rpmlint is clean - [mpeters at jerusalem result]$ ls *.rpm && rpmlint *.rpm streamtuner-0.99.99-4.fc4.i386.rpm streamtuner-0.99.99-4.fc4.src.rpm streamtuner-debuginfo-0.99.99-4.fc4.i386.rpm streamtuner-devel-0.99.99-4.fc4.i386.rpm W: streamtuner-devel no-documentation [mpeters at jerusalem result]$ from build.log -=- Features --enable-shoutcast yes --enable-live365 yes --enable-xiph yes --enable-local yes --enable-local-metadata yes --enable-python yes -=- builds everything it is suppose to (in mock) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 11:10:47 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:10:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173553] Review Request: xfce4-websearch-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191110.jBJBAlaj009745@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-websearch-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173553 ------- Additional Comments From luya256 at yahoo.com 2005-12-19 06:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) I wish I could assign this bug myself but I cannot change the bug status. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 11:31:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:31:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173553] Review Request: xfce4-websearch-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191131.jBJBV2xw012705@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-websearch-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173553 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-19 06:30 EST ------- Are you in the approved group of reviewers?(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > I wish I could assign this bug myself but I cannot change the bug status. Are you in the approved group of package reviewers? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 11:49:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 06:49:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176006] Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191149.jBJBnInj015248@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176006 ------- Additional Comments From matthias_haase at bennewitz.com 2005-12-19 06:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Excellent - rpmlint is clean - > builds everything it is suppose to (in mock) (In reply to comment #4) > but I am not able to sponsor people - so a reviewer who is able to do so still is needed. Have I to do some extra steps at this stage to get sponsored? -- Regards Matthias -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 12:19:50 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 07:19:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176006] Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191219.jBJCJoxZ019004@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176006 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-19 07:19 EST ------- Someone with the power to sponsor has to decide to do so. One thing to encourage that is to comment on other peoples packages to demonstrate the understanding of Fedora RPM PackagingGuidelines. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors You are at Step 6 - so someone who has authority to sponsor (from the sponsor list) has to do a formal review of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 12:24:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 07:24:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168690] Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191224.jBJCOQdL019488@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyBackPack (GTK+ Python backup tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168690 mpeters at mac.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO AssignedTo|mpeters at mac.com |gdk at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163776 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-19 07:24 EST ------- This needs to get changed to NEW again. The packager was not a contributor and per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors #7 - I should not have assigned the bug to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 12:42:47 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 07:42:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176096] New: Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176096 Summary: Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: roozbeh at farsiweb.info QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/gentium-fonts.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/gentium-fonts-1.02-1.src.rpm Description: I wish to ask for a review for the above package. This is my first FE package, so I also wish to ask for a sponsor. The description from the SPEC file: SIL Gentium ("belonging to the nations" in Latin) is a Unicode typeface family designed to enable the many diverse ethnic groups around the world who use the Latin script to produce readable, high-quality publications. It supports a wide range of Latin-based alphabets and includes glyphs that correspond to all the Latin ranges of Unicode. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 12:47:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 07:47:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175278] Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191247.jBJClYCf022030@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175278 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-19 07:47 EST ------- * Mon Dec 19 2005 Rex Dieter Message-ID: <200512191249.jBJCn7Y6022137@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gift-openft: Openft plugin for giFT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175279 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-19 07:48 EST ------- %changelog * Mon Dec 19 2005 Rex Dieter Message-ID: <200512191251.jBJCpjHI022362@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175282 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-19 07:51 EST ------- %changelog * Mon Dec 19 2005 Rex Dieter 1.0.1-2 - more %%doc's: AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING TODO - drop %%_libdir/lib*.la Spec Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/apollon-1.0.1-2.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/apollon-1.0.1-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From mpeters at mac.com Mon Dec 19 13:11:56 2005 From: mpeters at mac.com (Michael A. Peters) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:11:56 -0800 Subject: New License - was Re: [Bug 176096] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1134997917.2798.22.camel@locolhost.localdomain> On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 07:42 -0500, bugzilla at redhat.com wrote: > > Spec Name or Url: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/gentium-fonts.spec > SRPM Name or Url: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/gentium-fonts-1.02-1.src.rpm > > Description: > I wish to ask for a review for the above package. This is my first FE package, so I also wish to ask for a sponsor. > > The description from the SPEC file: > SIL Gentium ("belonging to the nations" in Latin) is a Unicode typeface family > designed to enable the many diverse ethnic groups around the world who use > the Latin script to produce readable, high-quality publications. It supports > a wide range of Latin-based alphabets and includes glyphs that correspond to > all the Latin ranges of Unicode. I don't think it is a problem, but does the license need to be reviewed by legal? It's a new license: http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&item_id=OFL I have a feeling they will be releasing other fonts soon under this license as well - they (at least some people in their organization) are pushing for usability of the upcoming $100 laptops in third world countries with non latin script fonts, and looking seriously at good Linux support for their fonts and libraries. And they have some really high quality fonts for that purpose. But anyway - Fedora stands to benefit from these fonts if the license is kosher. I don't know what Fedora's process is with having lawyers look at new licenses etc. for Extras - but whatever the process, if it needs to be started - I'd like it to be started. From fedora at camperquake.de Mon Dec 19 13:22:40 2005 From: fedora at camperquake.de (Ralf Ertzinger) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:22:40 +0100 Subject: New License - was Re: [Bug 176096] In-Reply-To: <1134997917.2798.22.camel@locolhost.localdomain> References: <1134997917.2798.22.camel@locolhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20051219132240.GC31712@ryoko.camperquake.de> On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 05:11:56AM -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote: > I don't think it is a problem, but does the license need to be reviewed > by legal? It's a new license: > > http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&item_id=OFL IANAL, but that looks compatible with Fedora. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 13:24:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 08:24:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170504] Review Request: makebootfat - Utility for creation bootable FAT disk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191324.jBJDORQ0025361@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makebootfat - Utility for creation bootable FAT disk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170504 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-19 08:24 EST ------- ping :) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 15:08:54 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:08:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173927] Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191508.jBJF8s4Y009595@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173927 kevin.kofler at chello.at changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin.kofler at chello.at ------- Additional Comments From kevin.kofler at chello.at 2005-12-19 10:08 EST ------- This could now use a FC4 build too, as KDE 3.5 has been pushed as a FC4 update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 15:10:10 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:10:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173927] Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191510.jBJFAAP9010016@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173927 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-19 10:09 EST ------- Agreed, target anybody with kde >= 3.5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 15:14:36 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:14:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173927] Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191514.jBJFEa7b011102@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173927 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-19 10:14 EST ------- %changelog * Mon Dec 19 2005 Rex Dieter 2.0-1 - 2.0(final) Spec Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/akode-2.0-1.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/akode-2.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 15:17:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:17:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173927] Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191517.jBJFHGrx011732@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173927 ------- Additional Comments From kevin.kofler at chello.at 2005-12-19 10:16 EST ------- Could the powers at be please approve this quickly? Akode being unavailable is technically a regression for FC4. I'm not sure any users will really lose productivity due to lack of audio codecs, but then again you never know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 15:20:36 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:20:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173927] Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191520.jBJFKaaL012665@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173927 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-19 10:20 EST ------- Kevin, Core's version of kdemultimedia never did provide akode support. That was provided by kdemultimedia-extras (from a certain uname-able repo that rhymes with bivna. (-:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 15:21:51 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:21:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173927] Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191521.jBJFLp12013051@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173927 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-19 10:21 EST ------- Kevin said: "Could the powers at be please approve this quickly?". All that is lacking is a package review, and we can get this published. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 15:25:36 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:25:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175844] Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191525.jBJFPabg013934@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175844 ------- Additional Comments From somlo at cmu.edu 2005-12-19 10:25 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/wmx.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/wmx-6pl1-4.src.rpm Fixed 'Summary' and '%description'. Also, added wmx.desktop. gdm has a defaul search path for .desktop files (/etc/X11/sessions/:/etc/X11/dm/Sessions/:/usr/share/gdm/BuiltInSessions/:/usr/share/xsessions/) Now, of these, only the latter two (both in /usr/share/) already existed on my stock FC4 machine. So, I placed wmx.desktop in /usr/share/xsessions/ along with the kde and gnome .desktop files which were already there. Why would I go put them in /etc/X11/dm/Sessions/ instead ? Is the /usr/share/xsessions/ location being deprecated? Also, looking at WindowMaker's example, I don't get the purpose of the shell script that goes in /etc/X11/gdm/Sessions/WindowMaker; where would that get called from ? Is it supposed to be a wrapper for the wmaker binary called by gdm via the .desktop file, or ??? Thanks, Gabriel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 15:26:54 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:26:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173927] Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191526.jBJFQsYk014366@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173927 ------- Additional Comments From kevin.kofler at chello.at 2005-12-19 10:26 EST ------- > Core's version of kdemultimedia never did provide akode support. That's true, as we are at technicalities... ;-) But more to the point: > All that is lacking is a package review >From another existing package maintainer as by the procedures, right? Or can untrusted users like me :-( now review packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 15:39:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:39:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173927] Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191539.jBJFdTd0017907@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173927 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-19 10:38 EST ------- See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewGuidelines in the "Reviewer" section. No need to be an existing maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 15:41:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:41:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173927] Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191541.jBJFfFvx018431@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173927 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-19 10:40 EST ------- Oops, per Comment #2, apparently akode *was* in Core's kdemultimedia pkg (probably only the "free" bit(s)). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 15:43:42 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:43:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176109] New: Review Request: pytraffic Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176109 Summary: Review Request: pytraffic Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: michel.vandenbergh at uhasselt.be QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://alpha.uhasselt.be/Research/Algebra/Members/pytraffic/pytraffic.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://alpha.uhasselt.be/Research/Algebra/Members/pytraffic/pytraffic-2.5.4-1.src.rpm Description: A screen version of the well known sliding block puzzle "Rush Hour". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 16:08:51 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:08:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175748] Review Request: cacti In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191608.jBJG8pRM024480@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cacti https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175748 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2005-12-19 11:08 EST ------- I've got these changes in. I'll wait to post them until we can figure out what to do about SELinux. I'll be monitoring the thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-selinux-list/2005-December/msg00124.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 16:54:55 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:54:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175605] Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191654.jBJGstxh031850@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175605 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-12-19 11:54 EST ------- Ralf do you intend on sponsoring Leif? Otherwise Leif, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors Candidates are eligible for cvsextras access only after they have approved packages in the Fedora Extras review process. After this point sponsors may choose to sponsor your cvsextras membership by judging your knowledge and understanding of the packaging guidelines and project processes. A good way to convince sponsors of your knowledge is to continue with other packages, or to review packages submitted by other users. There is no better way to convince sponsors that you have read and understand the packaging guidelines than to give good advice to other contributors about how they can improve their packages. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras If you have any questions about Fedora Extras, please see our extensive documention here first, then join fedora-extras-list and ask questions there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 16:56:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:56:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165955] Review Request: grads Grid Analysis and Display System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191656.jBJGu0PR031965@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grads Grid Analysis and Display System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165955 ------- Additional Comments From ed at eh3.com 2005-12-19 11:55 EST ------- Hi Patrice, I grabbed grads-1.9b4-4.src.rpm and took a closer look: good: + source "matches" upstream in the sense that you've clearly spent a lot of time carefully extracting only the files that have Fedora- compatible licenses and included them in a tarball derived from the upstream tarball (and your extraction script for the un-ship-able files was helpfully provided) + licenses are a mess but you've obviously put a lot of effort into tracking down the licenses for every file that matters and have correctly removed the ones that can't be in Extras + spec is legible and contains no obvious problems + builds in mock on FC-4 + rpmlint reports: W: grads wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding \ /usr/share/doc/grads-1.9b4/html/reference_card.pdf W: grads wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding \ /usr/share/doc/grads-1.9b4/html/GrADS.css W: grads wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding \ /usr/share/doc/grads-1.9b4/html/reference_card_scl.pdf whiche are all ignore-able warnings + I installed and ran a few of the binaries and they worked nicely--exactly per the tutorial Congrats on beating this old software into an Extras package. It doesn't look like the licensing was any fun to sort out. In fact, the upstream maintainers are clearly linking together software with incompatible licenses and perhaps don't realize or even care. Maybe they can contact the origianl authors (eg. Arlindo da Silva who is still apparently working at NASA Goddard) and get (some?) of the licenses changed so that more can be shipped. In any case, I don't see any remaining blockers so its APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 17:03:43 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:03:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK2 & compat-wxPythonGTK2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191703.jBJH3hcv000849@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-wxGTK2 & compat-wxPythonGTK2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175500 ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2005-12-19 12:03 EST ------- Packages that will need to have their spec file updated for the change : - audacity - bochs - comical - pgadmin3 - scorched3d I've only tested a rebuild of audacity, and it worked fine changing just : - The BuildRequires to add "compat-" - The %build section to add just before the %configure line : export WX_CONFIG="%{_bindir}/wx-2.4-config" Please consider applying the spec file patch I'll attach as it fixes many minor cosmetic issues in the spec file. It also changes to 755 the mode of the %ghost'ed script, so that rpmlint stops complaining. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Mon Dec 19 17:27:18 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:27:18 +0100 Subject: [Bug 175605] Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex In-Reply-To: <200512191654.jBJGstxh031850@www.beta.redhat.com> References: <200512191654.jBJGstxh031850@www.beta.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1135013238.12394.57.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 11:54 -0500, bugzilla at redhat.com wrote: > Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional > comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. > > Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175605 > > > wtogami at redhat.com changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |wtogami at redhat.com > > > > > ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-12-19 11:54 EST ------- > Ralf do you intend on sponsoring Leif? I can do so, ... Ralf From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 17:28:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:28:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166547] Review Request: multisync - Calendar (and other PIM data) synchronization program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191728.jBJHSYTm004848@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multisync - Calendar (and other PIM data) synchronization program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166547 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-19 12:28 EST ------- Build fails, needs BuildRequires: libgnomeui-devel make doesn't use smp flags, either add them or a comment as to why not. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake Your patch disables -Werror. Haven't got to compiling this yet, but the authors should know about any warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 17:30:01 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:30:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175500] Review Request: compat-wxGTK2 & compat-wxPythonGTK2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191730.jBJHU1f1005076@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-wxGTK2 & compat-wxPythonGTK2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175500 matthias at rpmforge.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From matthias at rpmforge.net 2005-12-19 12:29 EST ------- Since the patches only contain minor changes, I already approve both packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 17:37:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:37:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173927] Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191737.jBJHbYml006326@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173927 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2005-12-19 12:37 EST ------- Reviewer must own a package in Fedora Extras (quote: "The primary Reviewer can be any current package owner, unless the Contributor is a first timer."). Resolving apt.kde-redhat.org... failed: Temporary failure in name resolution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 17:41:53 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:41:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175899] Review Request: perl-DBD-CSV - DBI driver for CSV files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191741.jBJHfr5k006870@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-CSV - DBI driver for CSV files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175899 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2005-12-19 12:41 EST ------- SRPM Name or Url: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-DBD-CSV-0.22-2.src.rpm Changelog: Added missing build requirement perl(DBD::CSV) >= 0.30. This perl module is shipped i) standalone ii) and inside the DBI tarball (since DBI >= 1.42) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 17:44:20 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173927] Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191744.jBJHiKdR007379@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173927 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-19 12:44 EST ------- Michael, Re: Reviewer, sorry for the misinformation (I didn't read it closely enought). Hmm... kde-redhat.org resolves for me. You can alternatively use apt.unl.edu. In the meantime, I'll have to check things with our DNS provider. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From Jochen at herr-schmitt.de Mon Dec 19 17:52:34 2005 From: Jochen at herr-schmitt.de (Jochen Schmitt) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:52:34 +0100 Subject: Best Practice for retagging tags In-Reply-To: <43A5C1A4.80703@poolshark.org> References: <0MKwpI-1Eo4ZS3BNd-0007Ek@mrelayeu.kundenserver.de> <43A5C1A4.80703@poolshark.org> Message-ID: <0ML2ov-1EoPC024b9-0002D3@mrelayeu.kundenserver.de> On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 12:08:04 -0800, you wrote: >Tags can be moved with the -F options (see cvs tag --help), though >obviously you want to use that with care... Thank you for your hint. I have create a patch for Makefile.common which introduced a 'make retag' command. The advance of this command is, that you don't have the need to figure out the tag name, if you need to retag. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -------------- next part -------------- Index: Makefile.common =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/common/Makefile.common,v retrieving revision 1.35 diff -r1.35 Makefile.common 309a310,314 > retag:: $(SPECFILE) $(COMMON_DIR)/branches > cvs tag $(TAG_OPTS) -c -F $(TAG) > @echo "Tagged with: $(TAG)" > @echo > 314a320 > 409a416 > @echo " retag Retag sources as \"$(TAG)\"" -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: not available URL: From qspencer at ieee.org Mon Dec 19 17:57:27 2005 From: qspencer at ieee.org (Quentin Spencer) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:57:27 -0600 Subject: rpms/lapack/FC-4 lapack.spec,1.8,1.9 In-Reply-To: <200512191749.jBJHnFEE000886@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> References: <200512191749.jBJHnFEE000886@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Message-ID: <43A6F487.3090208@ieee.org> Tom Callaway (spot) wrote: >Author: spot > >Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/lapack/FC-4 >In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv847/FC-4 > >Modified Files: > lapack.spec >Log Message: > >Bump for gcc4.1. > > > >Index: lapack.spec >=================================================================== >RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/lapack/FC-4/lapack.spec,v >retrieving revision 1.8 >retrieving revision 1.9 >diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9 >--- lapack.spec 15 Nov 2005 15:45:38 -0000 1.8 >+++ lapack.spec 19 Dec 2005 17:48:43 -0000 1.9 >@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > Summary: The LAPACK libraries for numerical linear algebra. > Name: lapack > Version: 3.0 >-Release: 35%{?dist} >+Release: 36%{?dist} > License: Freely distributable > Group: Development/Libraries > URL: http://www.netlib.org/lapack/ >@@ -164,6 +164,9 @@ > %{_libdir}/libblas*.a > > %changelog >+* Mon Dec 19 2005 Tom "spot" Callaway 3.0-36 >+- bump for gcc4.1 >+ > * Tue Nov 15 2005 Tom "spot" Callaway 3.0-35 > - try not to patch files that do not exist > > This isn't needed for FC-4, only in devel. -Quentin From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 18:02:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:02:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169731] Review Request: ecl - Embeddable Common-Lisp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191802.jBJI2XIH010772@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ecl - Embeddable Common-Lisp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169731 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-19 13:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > What you propose that should go into the devel package? Any headers or other devel files that would be used to build something against the program, but not to use it. If you required certain headers to use the ecl compiler then they don't need to be, for example gcc includes some devel files. I don't use this so I do not know what the typical use case requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 18:08:03 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:08:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176137] New: Review Request: perl-Log-Log4perl - Log4j implementation for Perl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176137 Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Log4perl - Log4j implementation for Perl Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Log-Log4perl.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Log-Log4perl-1.02-1.src.rpm Description: Log::Log4perl lets you remote-control and fine-tune the logging behaviour of your system from the outside. It implements the widely popular (Java-based) Log4j logging package in pure Perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ville.skytta at iki.fi Mon Dec 19 18:54:43 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:54:43 +0200 Subject: Best Practice for retagging tags In-Reply-To: <0ML2ov-1EoPC024b9-0002D3@mrelayeu.kundenserver.de> References: <0MKwpI-1Eo4ZS3BNd-0007Ek@mrelayeu.kundenserver.de> <43A5C1A4.80703@poolshark.org> <0ML2ov-1EoPC024b9-0002D3@mrelayeu.kundenserver.de> Message-ID: <1135018483.3561.11.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 18:52 +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote: > I have create a patch for Makefile.common which introduced a > 'make retag' command. The advance of this command is, that you > don't have the need to figure out the tag name, if you need to > retag. FWIW, I don't think making force-tagging easier is a good idea. The best practice for this would IMO be "don't do it, just bump release and proceed as usual instead". From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 19:28:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:28:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173111] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191928.jBJJSSYH026245@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173111 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-19 14:28 EST ------- it does not start on fc4 x86_64 it says "connection to daemon" bu it never finish. here are the strace output: socket(PF_FILE, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 3 connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/home/dragoran/.gdesklets/sockets/:0.0"}, 40) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) close(4) = 0 select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 100000}) = 0 (Timeout) Verbinden mit Daemon [ ### ]) = 37 "..., 37 socket(PF_FILE, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 4 connect(4, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/home/dragoran/.gdesklets/sockets/:0.0"}, 40) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) close(3) = 0 select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 100000}) = 0 (Timeout) Verbinden mit Daemon [### ]) = 37 "..., 37 socket(PF_FILE, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 3 connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/home/dragoran/.gdesklets/sockets/:0.0"}, 40) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) close(4) = 0 select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 100000}) = 0 (Timeout) Verbinden mit Daemon [ ### ]) = 37 "..., 37 socket(PF_FILE, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 4 connect(4, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/home/dragoran/.gdesklets/sockets/:0.0"}, 40) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) close(3) = 0 select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 100000} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From qspencer at ieee.org Mon Dec 19 19:40:01 2005 From: qspencer at ieee.org (Quentin Spencer) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:40:01 -0600 Subject: Build error on x86_64 In-Reply-To: <20051219190558.226C97FD2@extras64.linux.duke.edu> References: <20051219190558.226C97FD2@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Message-ID: <43A70C91.6070407@ieee.org> I recently got the following error building ufsparse on x86_64 for development: + make -f Makefile 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=nocona -fPIC' libldl.a gcc -c -O ldl.c -o ldl.o ar cr libldl.a ldl.o ranlib libldl.a ++ ls ldl.o + gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,libldl.so.1 -o libldl.so.1.2 ldl.o /usr/bin/ld: ldl.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC ldl.o: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status I don't understand this. The -fPIC flag was used to build ldl.o, so why is the linker telling me to recompile with -fPIC? As far as I can tell, the parts of the spec file and tar ball are unchanged since the last release, so the only thing different would be gcc. Is it possible gcc 4.1 is causing this? -Quentin From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 19:39:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:39:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173111] Review Request: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191939.jBJJd9fm028475@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173111 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-19 14:38 EST ------- This bug entry is for the review of the package. Please put bug reports in their own independent entries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 19:51:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:51:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512191951.jBJJpkQj031627@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2005-12-19 14:51 EST ------- Jef, The buildrequires for libXdmcp-devel must have been caused by some recent changes on rawhide, it build fine without it in mock the last time i tried. I've change the spec file to now buildrequire libXdmcp-devel and also remove the buildrequires on libSM-devel as it is now required for libgnomeui-devel which is already in the list. ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/nact/nautilus-actions.spec ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/nact/nautilus-actions-0.99-4.src.rpm Note I've not tested this build in mock (I'm currently getting some yum error using it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 20:36:47 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:36:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174320] Review Request: gcdmaster - Gnome Audio CD mastering In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512192036.jBJKalYq006112@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gcdmaster - Gnome Audio CD mastering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174320 wtogami at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wtogami at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From wtogami at redhat.com 2005-12-19 15:36 EST ------- > Damn i should finish my coffee before i do these things. Mp3 support is > obviously not RPM-neutral since you might accidentally tie the built RPM to > libmad.so.0 if libmad-devel happens to be installed. This is not an issue for Extras, because each build happens from a minimal buildroot with only listed deps installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From katzj at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 21:00:25 2005 From: katzj at redhat.com (Jeremy Katz) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:00:25 -0500 Subject: Best Practice for retagging tags In-Reply-To: <1135018483.3561.11.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> References: <0MKwpI-1Eo4ZS3BNd-0007Ek@mrelayeu.kundenserver.de> <43A5C1A4.80703@poolshark.org> <0ML2ov-1EoPC024b9-0002D3@mrelayeu.kundenserver.de> <1135018483.3561.11.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> Message-ID: <1135026025.9541.29.camel@bree.local.net> On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 20:54 +0200, Ville Skytt? wrote: > On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 18:52 +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote: > > I have create a patch for Makefile.common which introduced a > > 'make retag' command. The advance of this command is, that you > > don't have the need to figure out the tag name, if you need to > > retag. > > FWIW, I don't think making force-tagging easier is a good idea. The > best practice for this would IMO be "don't do it, just bump release and > proceed as usual instead". I tend to agree, which is why I have thus far avoided committing any patches that make force tagging easier :-) Jeremy From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 20:58:10 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:58:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175844] Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512192058.jBJKwAwm009305@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175844 ------- Additional Comments From somlo at cmu.edu 2005-12-19 15:58 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/wmx.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/wmx-6pl1-5.src.rpm If the script /etc/X11/xinit/Xclients.d/Xclients.wmx.sh exists, gdm will use it to fire up wmx if wmx was selected by the user at the gdm greeting screen. This latest version supplies such a file, which either finds and fires up a custom set of apps in the user's home directory, or starts up a few defaults (xterm and xscreensaver) before launching wmx. Tested it on a stock FC4 box and it looks like it's working right Let me know what you all think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From roland at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 21:03:28 2005 From: roland at redhat.com (Roland McGrath) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:03:28 -0800 (PST) Subject: Build error on x86_64 In-Reply-To: Quentin Spencer's message of Monday, 19 December 2005 13:40:01 -0600 <43A70C91.6070407@ieee.org> Message-ID: <20051219210328.A10CB1809B2@magilla.sf.frob.com> > I recently got the following error building ufsparse on x86_64 for > development: > > + make -f Makefile 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=nocona -fPIC' libldl.a > gcc -c -O ldl.c -o ldl.o There is no -fPIC here. Perhaps the makefile doesn't use CFLAGS? From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 21:13:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:13:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169927] Review Request: scim-fcitx - Chinese IMEngine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512192113.jBJLDRhY011672@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-fcitx - Chinese IMEngine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169927 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-19 16:13 EST ------- The careful review is mostly thanks to the fedora-qa script. rpmlint - rpmlint of scim-fcitx: Missing changelog entry, minor - rpmlint of scim-fcitx-tools: No docs, ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC4 i386 - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Note that I have not tested using this. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From qspencer at ieee.org Mon Dec 19 21:16:42 2005 From: qspencer at ieee.org (Quentin Spencer) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:16:42 -0600 Subject: Build error on x86_64 In-Reply-To: <20051219210328.A10CB1809B2@magilla.sf.frob.com> References: <20051219210328.A10CB1809B2@magilla.sf.frob.com> Message-ID: <43A7233A.9090003@ieee.org> Roland McGrath wrote: >>I recently got the following error building ufsparse on x86_64 for >>development: >> >>+ make -f Makefile 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=nocona -fPIC' libldl.a >>gcc -c -O ldl.c -o ldl.o >> >> > >There is no -fPIC here. Perhaps the makefile doesn't use CFLAGS? > > > Yes, I just noticed that myself. I've tried patching the Makefile and rebuilding. However, it seems odd that this would be a problem with gcc 4.1, but not earlier (I have built this successfully on FC3/x86_64 and on pre-gcc4.1-development/x86_64). -Quentin From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 21:19:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:19:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512192119.jBJLJnfe012605@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2005-12-19 16:19 EST ------- Ping. This has been in the approval queue for over a month now. Can someone finally approve it, please? :) Pretty please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 21:34:48 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:34:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175127] Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512192134.jBJLYmh7015016@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127 ------- Additional Comments From dmaley at redhat.com 2005-12-19 16:34 EST ------- Updated based on previous comments: - added disttag - removed pango-devel and glib2-devel BR - Name and Comment in .desktop start w/ uppercase letters - added -q to %setup - added audio/x-wav MimeType in .desktop SPEC: http://homer.homelinux.net/RPMS/wavbreaker.spec SRPM: http://homer.homelinux.net/RPMS/wavbreaker-0.6.1-5.src.rpm There is still 1 outstanding request which is to have wavbreaker default to ALSA. I agree that this should be changed and will be working on a patch to address this, however I likely won't have time until after the holidays to complete it. I have 1 additional question based on the ScriptletSnippets wiki page. Should I add gtk-update-icon-cache to %post and %postun? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 21:40:30 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:40:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169927] Review Request: scim-fcitx - Chinese IMEngine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512192140.jBJLeUDF015901@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-fcitx - Chinese IMEngine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169927 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2005-12-19 16:40 EST ------- I've tested it -- works very nicely. Better interface than the default pinyin input method provided by scim, at least in my opinion. Looking forward to seeing it in Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rdieter at math.unl.edu Mon Dec 19 22:08:38 2005 From: rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:08:38 -0600 Subject: kdemultimedia-extras/kdemultimedia-nonfree Message-ID: <43A72F66.5080207@math.unl.edu> Now that kde-3.5.0 has been released for fc4, I'll resend In the spirit of the current kdemultimedia-extras pkg available from rpm.livna.org, I've made a similar beast for kde-3.5.0, except this time we've got 2 subpkgs: (1) free/distributable bits (to be available from Fedora Extras, using dependancies already available in FE), including akode_arts_plugin (akode), juk (libtunepimp), kfile-plugins: flac, mpc, mp3 (taglib), (2) nonfree bits (ie, like the existing kdemultimedia-extras from livna), including akode_arts_plugin extra bits (akode-extras), krec mp3 export (lame), mpeglib_artsplugin, xine_artsplugin (xine-lib) The primary question on my mind right now is naming. I'm leaning toward naming (1) kdemultimedia-extras and (2) kdemultimedia-nonfree. I know this makes the proposed FE package overlap/obsolete the existing livna pkg, but I think this is the safest road to follow. Opinions? I've got a rough(*) implentation of -extras and -nonfree pushed to kde-redhat users since kde-3.5.0 has been released (and haven't heard any outcries of brokeness): http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/kdemultimedia-3.5.0-1.7.spec (*) rough because it's a single specfile that can be used to create one of: core kdemultimedia rpms (kdemultimedia/kdemultimedia-devel), kdemultimedia-extras or kdemultimedia-nonfree. I can easily fix that, if I get positive feedback to move forward. Don't want to waste time on it otherwise... -- Rex From dennis at ausil.us Mon Dec 19 22:20:34 2005 From: dennis at ausil.us (Dennis Gilmore) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:20:34 -0600 Subject: kdemultimedia-extras/kdemultimedia-nonfree In-Reply-To: <43A72F66.5080207@math.unl.edu> References: <43A72F66.5080207@math.unl.edu> Message-ID: <200512191620.34237.dennis@ausil.us> On Monday 19 December 2005 16:08, Rex Dieter wrote: > Now that kde-3.5.0 has been released for fc4, I'll resend > > In the spirit of the current kdemultimedia-extras pkg available from > rpm.livna.org, I've made a similar beast for kde-3.5.0, > except this time we've got 2 subpkgs: > > (1) free/distributable bits (to be available from Fedora Extras, using > dependancies already available in FE), including akode_arts_plugin > (akode), juk (libtunepimp), kfile-plugins: flac, mpc, mp3 (taglib), i assume by mp3 you just mean the tag editor i think that should be ok > (2) nonfree bits (ie, like the existing kdemultimedia-extras from > livna), including akode_arts_plugin extra bits (akode-extras), krec mp3 > export (lame), mpeglib_artsplugin, xine_artsplugin (xine-lib) > > The primary question on my mind right now is naming. I'm leaning toward > naming (1) kdemultimedia-extras and (2) kdemultimedia-nonfree. I know > this makes the proposed FE package overlap/obsolete the existing livna > pkg, but I think this is the safest road to follow. > > Opinions? sounds good to me the kdemultimedia-extras package would probably get fairly widespread adoption. I would use both personally. the only other option i see for kdemultimedia-extras is kdemultimedia-addons but i dont think it sounds as good. Dennis From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 23:26:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:26:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512192326.jBJNQXAt032270@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2005-12-19 18:26 EST ------- Tested the the build in which mock configuration? fc4 or rawhide? I did my build on an fc4 box against the rawhide mock root. mock running from a rawhide will not work... since the bump of yum to 2.5.x. But mock -r fedora-development-i386-core on an fc4 box does work to build packages for a rawhide at the moment. I should be able to finish this up tonite. What I'm not clear about is, am I suppose to do a full formal review or does the review brian did count and I'm just suppose to confirm the blockers are fixed? All i know is this is going to be pretty useful little package. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 19 23:53:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:53:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167714] Review Request: pam_usb: PAM module for use with DSA key pairs and removable devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512192353.jBJNrQoW004610@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_usb: PAM module for use with DSA key pairs and removable devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167714 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2005-12-19 18:53 EST ------- I haven't been approved as a reviewer yet, so this remains an unofficial review. I'll take reviewing responsibility as soon as I have permission to do so. Good: + Source matches upstream + GPL license ok. Includes license text. Matches upstream. + ChangeLog ok. + No tag violations + BuildRoot ok + No unnecessary Requires + No unnecessary BR + Summary and description ok. + Includes relevant documentation. + No desktop file needed. + Consistent macro usage. + Not relocatable + Code, not content + Package names contains an underscore, but so does upstream, so I'm willing to ignore it. + Source matches upstream + 0wns its own directories. + Shared library not in default linker path; ldconfig not needed. + No duplicates in %files + permissions look ok + Builds in mock (for i386) Needswork: - Doesn't install on x86_64. spec file correctly uses %{_lib}, but src/Makefile hardcodes $(DESTDIR)/lib/. - Conditional compilation of hotplug: Is this really necessary? For FE I would think that you'd always want to build the hotplug module. I would recomend either removing this conditonal completely, or changing it so that the hotplug package is built by default. Check: . Runs - I'll test that as soon as the x86_64 package works. Additional comments: rpmlint output seems harmless: W: pam_usb unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/security/pam_usb.so Commas are not necessary in BuildRequires. My preferencs is to remove them, but this is not a blocker. It looks like 0.3.3 is available upstream. Have you considered upgrading? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk Tue Dec 20 01:04:16 2005 From: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk (Paul) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 01:04:16 +0000 Subject: f2c/libf2c Message-ID: <1135040656.6846.59.camel@T7.Linux> Hi, I'm considering packaging f2c and libf2c for extras, but have a couple of questions. First, neither has a configure file, just copy the makefile.u to makefile and alter the odd parameter inside (libf2c). Am I okay to copy the file from within the spec file and then run a patch against it? Second, f2c comes as a tarball. All of the files inside of the directory are gzipped (so it's src.tar -> src -> *.gz rather than src.tar.gz -> src). As long as I write a note to say this is not the original packaged format and make the tarball a tar.gz, would there be any problems? Last is the licence. There is nothing explicit in there. The one for f2c & libf2c reads /**************************************************************** Copyright 1990 - 1997 by AT&T, Lucent Technologies and Bellcore. Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that both that the copyright notice and this permission notice and warranty disclaimer appear in supporting documentation, and that the names of AT&T, Bell Laboratories, Lucent or Bellcore or any of their entities not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software without specific, written prior permission. AT&T, Lucent and Bellcore disclaim all warranties with regard to this software, including all implied warranties of merchantability and fitness. In no event shall AT&T, Lucent or Bellcore be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this software. ****************************************************************/ It's hard to say what sort of licence that is - it's not GPL in name. Any advice as to if it is worth creating the spec files etc would be appreciated. TTFN Paul -- main(t,_,a) char*a;{return!0 From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 01:04:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:04:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512200104.jBK14I5l013608@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2005-12-19 20:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > Tested the the build in which mock configuration? fc4 or rawhide? > I did my build on an fc4 box against the rawhide mock root. > mock running from a rawhide will not work... since the bump of yum to 2.5.x. > > But mock -r fedora-development-i386-core on an fc4 box does work to build > packages for a rawhide at the moment. > I tested that this built against Rawhide back in comment #2 (this package will not build in FC4 because of the modular X BR). Due to the some of the recent packages pushed out in the last couple of days in Rawhide, it might not build right now. Once Rawhide settles down a bit, it should hopefully build providing the BR packages haven't changed. I'm guessing if there is any problems, it will be the modular X packages since there's a lot of work being done on them. > I should be able to finish this up tonite. What I'm not clear about is, am I > suppose to do a full formal review or does the review brian did count and I'm > just suppose to confirm the blockers are fixed? You just need to verify that the blockers have been fixed, and that it will build and run as expected in FC5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From mpeters at mac.com Tue Dec 20 02:16:37 2005 From: mpeters at mac.com (Michael A. Peters) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:16:37 -0800 Subject: f2c/libf2c In-Reply-To: <1135040656.6846.59.camel@T7.Linux> References: <1135040656.6846.59.camel@T7.Linux> Message-ID: <1135044997.2798.47.camel@locolhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 01:04 +0000, Paul wrote: > Hi, > > I'm considering packaging f2c and libf2c for extras, but have a couple > of questions. > > First, neither has a configure file, just copy the makefile.u to > makefile and alter the odd parameter inside (libf2c). Am I okay to copy > the file from within the spec file and then run a patch against it? I haven't seen the Makefile It would be better imho to modify the Makefile with sed so that macros can be used - IE cp Makefile Makefile.orig cat Makefile.orig |sed -e s?"^PREFIX=stuff"?"PREFIX=%{_prefix}" or whatever. > > Second, f2c comes as a tarball. All of the files inside of the directory > are gzipped (so it's src.tar -> src -> *.gz rather than src.tar.gz -> > src). As long as I write a note to say this is not the original packaged > format and make the tarball a tar.gz, would there be any problems? Why not unzip them inside the %prep section? > > Last is the licence. There is nothing explicit in there. The one for f2c > & libf2c reads > > /**************************************************************** > Copyright 1990 - 1997 by AT&T, Lucent Technologies and Bellcore. > > Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software > and its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby > granted, provided that the above copyright notice appear in all > copies and that both that the copyright notice and this > permission notice and warranty disclaimer appear in supporting > documentation, and that the names of AT&T, Bell Laboratories, > Lucent or Bellcore or any of their entities not be used in > advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the > software without specific, written prior permission. > > AT&T, Lucent and Bellcore disclaim all warranties with regard to > this software, including all implied warranties of > merchantability and fitness. In no event shall AT&T, Lucent or > Bellcore be liable for any special, indirect or consequential > damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, > data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or > other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the > use or performance of this software. > ****************************************************************/ > > It's hard to say what sort of licence that is - it's not GPL in name. Not an expert - looks like MIT? http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 02:41:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:41:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512200241.jBK2fC7c025493@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2005-12-19 21:41 EST ------- this is maddening... now I'm getting a new build error from mock using your new src.rpm Do you need need libXau-devel as a buildrequires? -jef here's the build.log snippet: checking for glib-2.0 >= 2.4.0 gthread-2.0 >= 2.4.0 gmodule-2.0 >= 2.4.0 gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0 libglade-2.0 >= 2.4.0 libgnome-2.0 >= 2.7.0 libgnomeui-2.0 >= 2.7.0 gconf-2.0 >= 2.8.0 libnautilus-extension >= 2.8.0... Package xau was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `xau.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'xau', required by 'X11', not found configure: error: Library requirements ( glib-2.0 >= 2.4.0 gthread-2.0 >= 2.4.0 gmodule-2.0 >= 2.4.0 gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0 libglade-2.0 >= 2.4.0 libgnome-2.0 >= 2.7.0 libgnomeui-2.0 >= 2.7.0 gconf-2.0 >= 2.8.0 libnautilus-extension >= 2.8.0) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.47387 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 02:56:05 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:56:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512200256.jBK2u5SW027063@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2005-12-19 21:55 EST ------- I would hold off on trying to build this in Mock until Rawhide has settled down a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 03:38:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:38:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176200] New: Review Request: Mud Magic Client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176200 Summary: Review Request: Mud Magic Client Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: kyndig at mudmagic.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.mudmagic.com/mud-client/downloads/mudmagic.spec.in SRPM Name or Url: http://www.mudmagic.com/mud-client/downloads/mudmagic-1.8-0.fdr.3.src.rpm Description : Gtk program for connecting to online text games ( Muds ). This is a cross platform Linux / Windows based Open Source mud client. Hi - this is a mud client for playing online text games. I'd like to add the upcoming 1.8 release of my client to Fedora Extra's. This is an early model of the upcoming release expected to be announced at the end of Dec. Currently the rpm will only install with --force, though the required libmxp is installed with the distro. I havn't solved this yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From qspencer at ieee.org Tue Dec 20 04:54:19 2005 From: qspencer at ieee.org (Quentin Spencer) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:54:19 -0600 Subject: Buildsys stuck? Message-ID: <43A78E7B.7010409@ieee.org> There are a couple of jobs that have been "building" for 8 hours now. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 07:30:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 02:30:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176205] New: Review Request: GZLauncher Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176205 Summary: Review Request: GZLauncher Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: nickmarko at gmail.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.filelodge.com/files/hdd4/84253/gzlauncher.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.filelodge.com/files/hdd4/84253/gzlauncher-1.06.4-1.src.rpm Description: This program allows linux users to connect to and play on ZDaemon servers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Tue Dec 20 07:41:07 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:41:07 +0100 Subject: rpms/new/devel new.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 In-Reply-To: <200512192230.jBJMUouN012449@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> References: <200512192230.jBJMUouN012449@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1135064467.12394.157.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 17:30 -0500, W. Michael Petullo wrote: > Author: mikep > > Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/new/devel > In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv12409/devel > > Modified Files: > .cvsignore sources > Added Files: > new.spec > Log Message: > auto-import new-1.3.5-2 on branch devel from new-1.3.5-2.src.rpm > > > --- NEW FILE new.spec --- > %install > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > %makeinstall > rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrn.a > rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrn.la > rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/lib/libnewtemplate.a > rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/lib/libnewtemplate.la Is this really correct? I guess, you actually want rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/*.*a Ralf From mpeters at mac.com Tue Dec 20 08:15:33 2005 From: mpeters at mac.com (Michael A. Peters) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:15:33 -0800 Subject: rpms/new/devel new.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2 In-Reply-To: <1135064467.12394.157.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <200512192230.jBJMUouN012449@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <1135064467.12394.157.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <1135066533.2798.62.camel@locolhost.localdomain> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 08:41 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > --- NEW FILE new.spec --- > > > %install > > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > > %makeinstall > > rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrn.a > > rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/lib/libnewfmt_ptrn.la > > rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/lib/libnewtemplate.a > > rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}/usr/lib/libnewtemplate.la > Is this really correct? > > I guess, you actually want > > rm -f ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/*.*a Spec file should have --disable-static as a %configure switch (it respects it). Then only the *.la files would need to be removed after %makeinstall From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 10:11:11 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 05:11:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173553] Review Request: xfce4-websearch-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201011.jBKABBso028649@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-websearch-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173553 ------- Additional Comments From luya256 at yahoo.com 2005-12-20 05:10 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Are you in the approved group of reviewers?(In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > > I wish I could assign this bug myself but I cannot change the bug status. > > Are you in the approved group of package reviewers? Yes I am -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 10:18:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 05:18:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175605] Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201018.jBKAIOYM030388@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Multiplex https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175605 ------- Additional Comments From lmb at biosci.ki.se 2005-12-20 05:18 EST ------- Is there any policy for splitting perl packages into subpackages? I see in the http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines that splitting a CPAN module is a viable option. But how important is dependency granularity? Check this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174099 So far nothing in FE has been borked by this. That also means that nothing else in FE is depending on perl-IO-Multiplex. So my opinion is that a subpackage is in order in this case. But I'm ready to be convinced otherwise... ie: perl-Net-Server ^ | (subpackage split) | perl-Net-Server-Multiplex -> perl-IO-Multiplex The alternative is to just add a Requires: perl-IO-Multiplex in perl-Net-Server. Which alternative is preferable? On a different note, who is maintaing postfix (in core)? And what would the implications be for mucking with master.cf and main.cf? I would like to have scriptlets in postfix-postgrey that modify those files to add funtionality. Much the way as the kernel plays with grub.cong. But the modification of smtpd_recipient_restrictions would be left as an excercise for root. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk Tue Dec 20 10:31:17 2005 From: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk (Paul F. Johnson) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:31:17 +0000 Subject: f2c/libf2c In-Reply-To: <1135044997.2798.47.camel@locolhost.localdomain> References: <1135040656.6846.59.camel@T7.Linux> <1135044997.2798.47.camel@locolhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1135074677.6846.79.camel@T7.Linux> Hi, > > First, neither has a configure file, just copy the makefile.u to > > makefile and alter the odd parameter inside (libf2c). Am I okay to copy > > the file from within the spec file and then run a patch against it? > > I haven't seen the Makefile > It would be better imho to modify the Makefile with sed so that macros > can be used - IE > > cp Makefile Makefile.orig > cat Makefile.orig |sed -e s?"^PREFIX=stuff"?"PREFIX=%{_prefix}" or > whatever. The libf2c makefile is actually broken as it stands (as is the f2c one) as neither correctly identify where to make install to! > > Second, f2c comes as a tarball. All of the files inside of the directory > > are gzipped (so it's src.tar -> src -> *.gz rather than src.tar.gz -> > > src). As long as I write a note to say this is not the original packaged > > format and make the tarball a tar.gz, would there be any problems? > > Why not unzip them inside the %prep section? If someone doesn't have gunzip they can't (though I'll hazard a guess tar will gunzip) > > Last is the licence. There is nothing explicit in there. The one for f2c > > & libf2c reads > > It's hard to say what sort of licence that is - it's not GPL in name. > > Not an expert - looks like MIT? > > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php It sure does. What are the rules regarding attribution of a licence which is substantially the same but not explicitly stated as such? TTFN Paul -- main(t,_,a) char*a;{return!0 References: <1135040656.6846.59.camel@T7.Linux> <1135044997.2798.47.camel@locolhost.localdomain> <1135074677.6846.79.camel@T7.Linux> Message-ID: <1135075615.1969.1.camel@ignacio.lan> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 10:31 +0000, Paul F. Johnson wrote: > > > It's hard to say what sort of licence that is - it's not GPL in name. > > > > Not an expert - looks like MIT? > > > > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php > > It sure does. What are the rules regarding attribution of a licence > which is substantially the same but not explicitly stated as such? I don't think there's any hard rule re that. Everyone just calls a spade a spade. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 11:00:45 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 06:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175278] Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201100.jBKB0jqo008386@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175278 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-20 06:00 EST ------- At the end of %configure : use libxml..............: no libxml can be enabled with: +BuildRequires: libxml2-devel -%configure +%configure --with-libxml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From paul at city-fan.org Tue Dec 20 11:11:48 2005 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:11:48 +0000 Subject: f2c/libf2c In-Reply-To: <1135075615.1969.1.camel@ignacio.lan> References: <1135040656.6846.59.camel@T7.Linux> <1135044997.2798.47.camel@locolhost.localdomain> <1135074677.6846.79.camel@T7.Linux> <1135075615.1969.1.camel@ignacio.lan> Message-ID: <43A7E6F4.7010505@city-fan.org> Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 10:31 +0000, Paul F. Johnson wrote: > >>>>It's hard to say what sort of licence that is - it's not GPL in name. >>> >>>Not an expert - looks like MIT? >>> >>>http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php >> >>It sure does. What are the rules regarding attribution of a licence >>which is substantially the same but not explicitly stated as such? > > > I don't think there's any hard rule re that. Everyone just calls a spade > a spade. Could it not just be "MIT-style"? Paul. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 11:36:06 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 06:36:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169927] Review Request: scim-fcitx - Chinese IMEngine for SCIM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201136.jBKBa6Z5015403@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scim-fcitx - Chinese IMEngine for SCIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169927 petersen at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From petersen at redhat.com 2005-12-20 06:35 EST ------- Package imported into cvs, devel build and cvs branches requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk Tue Dec 20 12:00:22 2005 From: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk (Paul F. Johnson) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:00:22 +0000 Subject: f2c/libf2c In-Reply-To: <43A7E6F4.7010505@city-fan.org> References: <1135040656.6846.59.camel@T7.Linux> <1135044997.2798.47.camel@locolhost.localdomain> <1135074677.6846.79.camel@T7.Linux> <1135075615.1969.1.camel@ignacio.lan> <43A7E6F4.7010505@city-fan.org> Message-ID: <1135080022.6846.89.camel@T7.Linux> Hi, > > I don't think there's any hard rule re that. Everyone just calls a spade > > a spade. > > Could it not just be "MIT-style"? Is MIT-style a valid licence though? TTFN Paul -- main(t,_,a) char*a;{return!0 References: <1135040656.6846.59.camel@T7.Linux> <1135044997.2798.47.camel@locolhost.localdomain> <1135074677.6846.79.camel@T7.Linux> <1135075615.1969.1.camel@ignacio.lan> <43A7E6F4.7010505@city-fan.org> <1135080022.6846.89.camel@T7.Linux> Message-ID: <20051220120432.GC23000@ryoko.camperquake.de> On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:00:22PM +0000, Paul F. Johnson wrote: > > Could it not just be "MIT-style"? > > Is MIT-style a valid licence though? If it were not we'd have to get rid of X, I think :) From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 12:13:10 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 07:13:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167714] Review Request: pam_usb: PAM module for use with DSA key pairs and removable devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201213.jBKCDADY021618@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_usb: PAM module for use with DSA key pairs and removable devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167714 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-20 07:13 EST ------- > src/Makefile hardcodes $(DESTDIR)/lib/. Add a patch for Makefiles for this and another issues. > Conditional compilation of hotplug Now just a separate package, compiled unconditionally > pam_usb unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/security/pam_usb.so Now stripped properly... > It looks like 0.3.3 is available upstream. Upgraded. New SPEC: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/pam_usb/pam_usb.spec New SRPM: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/pam_usb/pam_usb-0.3.3-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 12:21:05 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 07:21:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167621] Review Request: PyCairo - Python bindings for Cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201221.jBKCL5Qp022978@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyCairo - Python bindings for Cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167621 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-20 07:20 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > I'm not sure pygtk2 always gets installed, for instance if you do a "minimal" > install, haven't verified this though. I would suspect it does not always get installed - gtk2 is an X11 library, installs without X11 won't have it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 12:31:01 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 07:31:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167621] Review Request: PyCairo - Python bindings for Cairo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201231.jBKCV1kv024771@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyCairo - Python bindings for Cairo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167621 ------- Additional Comments From jacob.kroon at gmail.com 2005-12-20 07:30 EST ------- jrb (Jonathan Blandford I think) has already imported pycairo into core, so this bug is redundant now, so I'll close it soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 12:44:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 07:44:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175278] Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201244.jBKCi96O027167@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175278 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-20 07:44 EST ------- %changelog * Tue Dec 20 2005 Rex Dieter 0.11.8.1-3 - --with-libxml, BR: libxml2-devel Spec Name or Url:http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/gift-gnutella-0.0.10-3.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/gift-gnutella-0.0.10-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rdieter at math.unl.edu Tue Dec 20 13:01:19 2005 From: rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 07:01:19 -0600 Subject: kdemultimedia-extras/kdemultimedia-nonfree In-Reply-To: <200512191620.34237.dennis@ausil.us> References: <43A72F66.5080207@math.unl.edu> <200512191620.34237.dennis@ausil.us> Message-ID: Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Monday 19 December 2005 16:08, Rex Dieter wrote: > >>Now that kde-3.5.0 has been released for fc4, I'll resend >> >>In the spirit of the current kdemultimedia-extras pkg available from >>rpm.livna.org, I've made a similar beast for kde-3.5.0, >>except this time we've got 2 subpkgs: >> >>(1) free/distributable bits (to be available from Fedora Extras, using >>dependancies already available in FE), including akode_arts_plugin >>(akode), juk (libtunepimp), kfile-plugins: flac, mpc, mp3 (taglib), > > i assume by mp3 you just mean the tag editor i think that should be ok Yes, the mp3 kfile-plugin only provides the tagging features from taglib. -- Rex From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 13:04:11 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:04:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201304.jBKD4B7q030841@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-20 08:03 EST ------- * rpmlint clean: [mpeters at jerusalem result]$ ls *.rpm && rpmlint *.rpm mod_evasive-1.10.1-1.fc4.i386.rpm mod_evasive-debuginfo-1.10.1-1.fc4.i386.rpm mod_evasive-1.10.1-1.fc4.src.rpm [mpeters at jerusalem result]$ * proper naming of package and spec file * licensed with open source nice license (GPL) - BUT - incompat w/ Apache license * Spec file American English, readable, etc. * md5sum matches upstream - 784fca4a124f25ccff5b48c7a69a65e5 * Compiles in FC4 x86 mock * Correct %files section NEEDS It should restart the apache webserver The license thing - can you ask upstream to change it? Otherwise I think that is a block because GNU specifies that Apache Software License is not compat with GPL, and the module uses httpd-devel to build, so I'm not sure it can go into extras under the GPL license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 13:17:53 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:17:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176006] Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201317.jBKDHrs2002923@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176006 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2005-12-20 08:17 EST ------- one thing to mention is that some plugins require you to have a mp3 capable audio player to listen to the streams. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 13:43:21 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:43:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175282] Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201343.jBKDhLcR008483@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175282 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-20 08:43 EST ------- missing BuildRequires: libacl-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 13:47:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:47:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176006] Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201347.jBKDl0qh010055@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176006 ------- Additional Comments From matthias_haase at bennewitz.com 2005-12-20 08:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > one thing to mention is that some plugins require you to have a mp3 capable > audio player to listen to the streams. Hi, Che... ...streamtuner does not play/decode mp3's _by itself_ and isn't useless without an mp3 capable audio player. You can use streamtuner, for example, together with xmms and without an installed mp3 plug-in for xmms, getting from elsewhere. Same usability as for xmms or beep media player, related to the mp3 decoding stuff. --- Regards Matthias -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 13:50:07 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:50:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175282] Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201350.jBKDo7CN011129@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175282 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-20 08:49 EST ------- libacl-devel shouldn't be necessary. Or is this a manifestation of bug #170602 "Remove references to -lacl (and others) in .la files"? (I assume you're seeing this on fc4? If so, I'll reopen the bug) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 13:57:19 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:57:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175276] Review Request: gift: daemon for communicating with filesharing protocols In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201357.jBKDvJOU013337@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gift: daemon for communicating with filesharing protocols https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175276 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-20 08:57 EST ------- Review for release 3: * RPM name is OK * Source gift-0.11.8.1.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint looks OK * File lists look OK * Works APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 13:57:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:57:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175279] Review Request: gift-openft: Openft plugin for giFT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201357.jBKDvRZH013371@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gift-openft: Openft plugin for giFT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175279 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-20 08:57 EST ------- Review for release 2: * RPM name is OK * Source gift-openft-0.2.1.6.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of gift-openft looks OK * File list of gift-openft looks OK * Works APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 14:02:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:02:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175282] Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201402.jBKE2klD014475@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175282 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-20 09:02 EST ------- Yes, this is in an FC4 chroot via mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 14:16:21 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:16:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175282] Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201416.jBKEGLeX016755@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175282 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-20 09:16 EST ------- %changelog * Tue Dec 20 2005 Rex Dieter 1.0.1-3 - BR: libacl-devel (workaround kdelibs bug #170602) Spec Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/apollon-1.0.1-3.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/apollon-1.0.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 14:35:21 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:35:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176096] Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201435.jBKEZLJa020434@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176096 ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2005-12-20 09:35 EST ------- Someone just raised the issue on the IRC that the full URL of the source file is not mentioned in the spec file. The reason is that the full URL is utterly ugly. It's this: http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsi&format=file&media_id=Gentium_102_L_tar&filename=%2Fttf-sil-gentium_1.0.2.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From cmbullock at gmail.com Tue Dec 20 15:09:33 2005 From: cmbullock at gmail.com (Colin Bullock) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:09:33 -0600 Subject: Project Looking Glass Message-ID: Hello! My name is Colin Bullock, and i'm a developer with the Project Looking Glass team. If you aren't familiar with it, Looking Glass is an open-source, 3D desktop/windowing system, based on java3d (see http://lg3d.dev.java.net for more info). Currently, we are working to define our requirements for our 1.0 release, and in the process, we are looking into various distribution options. I use Fedora personally, and would love to see Looking Glass included in the extras repository. However, we wanted to put some feelers out, and get some feedback from the Fedora community members. Any thoughts, ideas, suggestions, comments, etc. on the matter would be greatly appreciated, and i will be sure to share them all with the rest of the Looking Glass community (or feel free to post comments on the Looking Glass forums). Thanks for any input. - Colin Bullock From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 15:07:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:07:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175282] Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201507.jBKF7kte027102@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: apollon: Filesharing client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175282 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-20 10:07 EST ------- Review for release 3: * RPM name is OK * Source apollon-1.0.1.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of apollon looks OK * File list of apollon looks OK * Works APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 15:23:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:23:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201523.jBKFNSam029745@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-20 10:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Paul, > > I don't feel confortable creating a bundle of Log::Dispatch, > Log::Dispatch::FileRotate, and Log::Log4perl because: > > i) these three perl distros are maintained by different people (the three > DateTime modules that have been bundled are all maintained by Dave Rolsky) > > ii) the circular dependencies are only caused by the test suite > as this module only extends Log::Dispatch but uses Log::Log4perl as it > main log infrastructure in the test suite (most likely, the test suite > should be redone using only Log::Dispatch or, at least, conditional > require Log::Log4perl). > > iii) The author of Log::Dispatch::FileRotate doesn't appear to be very > responsive, at leasat judging from the rt tickets > (http://rt.cpan.org/NoAuth/Bugs.html?Dist=Log-Dispatch-FileRotate); at least I > haven't got any answer for #14563. OK, that's fair enough. Is there a precedent in Extras for calling perl modules (or anything else for that matter) "distributable" in the absence of any specific licensing terms being included upstream? Looking at rt for this module, the author appears to be completely unresponsive to rt tickets. Perhaps it's worth trying to contact him directly? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From paul at city-fan.org Tue Dec 20 15:27:55 2005 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:27:55 +0000 Subject: f2c/libf2c In-Reply-To: <1135080022.6846.89.camel@T7.Linux> References: <1135040656.6846.59.camel@T7.Linux> <1135044997.2798.47.camel@locolhost.localdomain> <1135074677.6846.79.camel@T7.Linux> <1135075615.1969.1.camel@ignacio.lan> <43A7E6F4.7010505@city-fan.org> <1135080022.6846.89.camel@T7.Linux> Message-ID: <43A822FB.7070901@city-fan.org> Paul F. Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > >>>I don't think there's any hard rule re that. Everyone just calls a spade >>>a spade. >> >>Could it not just be "MIT-style"? > > > Is MIT-style a valid licence though? rpmlint will be OK with it if that's what you mean. Paul. From jspaleta at gmail.com Tue Dec 20 15:29:48 2005 From: jspaleta at gmail.com (Jeff Spaleta) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:29:48 -0500 Subject: Project Looking Glass In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <604aa7910512200729v275eceb8i577352b850a04bc9@mail.gmail.com> On 12/20/05, Colin Bullock wrote: > Currently, we are working to define our requirements for our 1.0 > release, and in the process, we are looking into various distribution > options. As in making looking glass part of a distribution? Or do you mean distributing Looking Glass separately but tailored for specific distributions? If you are looking to distribute Looking Glass as part of Fedora Extras, Looking Glass is going to have to be buildable and usable with the native gcj java stuff provided by Core. If Looking Glass requires a proprietary jvm it can't be part of Extras as a matter of policy. If Looking Glass can be built/used with the gcj java implementation in Core then there shouldn't be anything obvious stopping you from maintaining Looking Glass in Extras since the licensing on the project seems acceptible. But my understanding is Looking Glass requires a proprietary java implementation which is a non-starter for the discussion on how you can maintain this in Extras. -jef From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 15:45:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:45:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167714] Review Request: pam_usb: PAM module for use with DSA key pairs and removable devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201545.jBKFjQuF003353@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_usb: PAM module for use with DSA key pairs and removable devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167714 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-20 10:45 EST ------- Note that hotplug agents are pretty much obsoleted by udev in FC5. For an example, see the openct package in Extras CVS (devel branch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 16:13:45 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:13:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173979] Review Request: Licq - A graphical ICQ Client for Linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201613.jBKGDjTA009676@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Licq - A graphical ICQ Client for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173979 tmraz at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO ------- Additional Comments From tmraz at redhat.com 2005-12-20 11:13 EST ------- Sorry, still not right: rpmlint -v ../RPMS/i386/licq-1.3.2-1.i386.rpm I: licq checking E: licq version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/licq-1.3.2/doc/CVS/Root E: licq version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/licq-1.3.2/upgrade/CVS/Root E: licq version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/licq-1.3.2/upgrade/CVS/Repository E: licq version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/licq-1.3.2/doc/CVS/Entries E: licq version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/licq-1.3.2/upgrade/CVS/Entries E: licq version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/licq-1.3.2/doc/CVS/Repository Please run rpmlint against your built files next time to save your and my time ;-) Note that only relevant doc files should be in the package, not everything. Other problems: - please add LICENSE file to %doc as well. - %{_datadir}/locale/* in files - this is wrong '%find_lang xxxx' must be used with %files -f xxxx.lang'. Also the locale apparently belong to the osd plugin so they should be packaged with it. - read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines DesktopFiles entry how to cope with the .desktop file - It's also questionable if it should be included within the -kde subpackage or within the main package (I'd prefer that.) - the %post script seems completely bogus to me - the package doesn't own %{_datadir}/licq and %{_libdir}/licq -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 16:35:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:35:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201635.jBKGZN1u012778@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-20 11:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > Is there a precedent in Extras for calling perl modules (or anything else for > that matter) "distributable" in the absence of any specific licensing terms > being included upstream? Absence of copyright and licensing always means "legally questionable/use at your own risk", c.f. http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-pkgcopyright => This package probably qualifies as non-distributable. Another indication for the same, is this package seemingly missing from Debian (at least I could not find it). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 16:49:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:49:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176253] New: Review Request: clement-2.1 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: jmp at safe.ca QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Url: ftp://ftp.safe.ca/pub/clement-2.1/SPECS/clement-2.1-30.spec SRPM Url: ftp://ftp.safe.ca/pub/clement-2.1/SRPMS/clement-2.1-30.fc4.src.rpm Description: Clement is an E-mail firewall, its purpose is to filter out all E-mail. Rejecting Virus and unwelcome E-mail at the SMTP protocol level (avoiding to rebound E-mail to 'originator forged' E-mail), dubious E-mail are stored within a centralized quarantine area. Once accepted, E-mail are transmitted to internal/external standard Mail daemon (sendmail, postfix, exim, etc..) or kept within Clement own server area (such as domains defined as 'Keeplocal') on a per domain basis. For domain 'Keeplocal', E-mails are stored within virtual domains and can been retrieved using standard tools as dovecot. End user can access logs and quarantine area using clement WEB interface (URL named clement.'your_domain_name'). Clement can be connected to a remote Mentor process to help it to conduct an 'In-Depth sending context analyze' while still connected to remote originator, then becoming even smarter making SPAM level a trickle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 16:51:54 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:51:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175278] Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201651.jBKGpssj015461@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175278 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-20 11:51 EST ------- Packaging looks OK, but the Gnutella plugin can't connect here. It stays in status "Connecting..." in Apollon. The file data/gwebcaches in the tarball is probably missing. It could be useful to add data/hostiles.txt too. I've looked at some of the urls in data/gwebcaches, and it's only statistics, nothing illegal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 16:55:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:55:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167714] Review Request: pam_usb: PAM module for use with DSA key pairs and removable devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201655.jBKGtG1b016272@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_usb: PAM module for use with DSA key pairs and removable devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167714 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-20 11:55 EST ------- Does it mean that pam_usb-hotplug will not work under FC5 completely? In other words, should we do separate things for FC5 or not? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 16:59:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:59:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175278] Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201659.jBKGxP9h017002@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175278 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-20 11:59 EST ------- > The file data/gwebcaches in the tarball is probably missing. It could be useful > to add data/hostiles.txt too. Take this from gtk-gnutella (already in Extras). > I've looked at some of the urls in data/gwebcaches, and it's only statistics, > nothing illegal. Sure! Upstream say the same. IMHO it is unusable to ship package without gwebcaches etc., therefore such data should be present in the package (and properly tested :)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 17:02:45 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:02:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175278] Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201702.jBKH2jwJ017546@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175278 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-20 12:02 EST ------- I'll look into it. These seem like a upstream bugs to me, 'make install' should install all the bits needed for proper function. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 17:27:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201727.jBKHRRqi022037@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2005-12-20 12:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > Is there a precedent in Extras for calling perl modules (or anything else for > > that matter) "distributable" in the absence of any specific licensing terms > > being included upstream? > Absence of copyright and licensing always means "legally questionable/use at > your own risk", > c.f. http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-pkgcopyright > > => This package probably qualifies as non-distributable. > > Another indication for the same, is this package seemingly missing from Debian > (at least I could not find it). Isn't CPAN an exception? Every author that opens an account in PAUSE and submits files to it knows that they will be heavely mirrored (right now CPAN has more than 260 official mirrors). Fedora Core perl packages with "Distributable" license ------------------------------------------------------ distributable perl-Compress-Zlib Distributable perl-File-MMagic distributable perl-Net-Telnet Distributable perl-TermReadKey Distributable perl-URI distributable perl-XML-Grove Fedora Extras perl packages with "Distributable" license -------------------------------------------------------- Distributable perl-Class-DBI-Loader-Relationship Distributable perl-Crypt-Blowfish Distributable perl-Lingua-EN-Inflect-Number Distributable perl-Mail-Sender Distributable perl-Mail-Sendmail Distributable perl-Time-modules Distributable perl-UNIVERSAL-exports PS - Haven't checked their licenses but I remembered one or two Maypole requirements being approved with a Distributable license due to lack of license information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net Tue Dec 20 17:40:56 2005 From: thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net (Matthias Saou) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:40:56 +0100 Subject: Buildsys stuck? In-Reply-To: <43A78E7B.7010409@ieee.org> References: <43A78E7B.7010409@ieee.org> Message-ID: <20051220184056.26c5eccc@python2> Quentin Spencer wrote : > There are a couple of jobs that have been "building" for 8 hours now. The oldest started 22h ago now. Seems some kicking around is required :-) Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz) - Linux kernel 2.6.14-1.1653_FC4 Load : 1.51 0.80 0.77 From skvidal at linux.duke.edu Tue Dec 20 17:47:35 2005 From: skvidal at linux.duke.edu (seth vidal) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:47:35 -0500 Subject: Buildsys stuck? In-Reply-To: <20051220184056.26c5eccc@python2> References: <43A78E7B.7010409@ieee.org> <20051220184056.26c5eccc@python2> Message-ID: <1135100855.31481.46.camel@cutter> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 18:40 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote: > Quentin Spencer wrote : > > > There are a couple of jobs that have been "building" for 8 hours now. > > The oldest started 22h ago now. Seems some kicking around is required :-) > I kicked the plague-server. I can't kick the builders from here, though. -sv From nman64 at n-man.com Tue Dec 20 17:46:19 2005 From: nman64 at n-man.com (Patrick Barnes) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:46:19 -0600 Subject: Project Looking Glass In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <43A8436B.9050605@n-man.com> Colin Bullock wrote: > Hello! My name is Colin Bullock, and i'm a developer with the Project > Looking Glass team. If you aren't familiar with it, Looking Glass is > an open-source, 3D desktop/windowing system, based on java3d (see > http://lg3d.dev.java.net for more info). > > Currently, we are working to define our requirements for our 1.0 > release, and in the process, we are looking into various distribution > options. I use Fedora personally, and would love to see Looking Glass > included in the extras repository. However, we wanted to put some > feelers out, and get some feedback from the Fedora community members. > Any thoughts, ideas, suggestions, comments, etc. on the matter would > be greatly appreciated, and i will be sure to share them all with the > rest of the Looking Glass community (or feel free to post comments on > the Looking Glass forums). > > Thanks for any input. > - Colin Bullock > > Java3D does not meet Fedora's licensing requirements and cannot be included in Fedora Extras. Since Project Looking Glass is dependent upon Java3D, it also cannot go into Fedora Extras. If Project Looking Glass could work with the GCJ implementation in Fedora Core, then it would be eligible for inclusion in Fedora Extras. That said, your best chance at a Fedora-friendly package for Project Looking Glass would probably come from working with jpackage.org. You could use that as a starting point for Project Looking Glass in all RPM-based distributions, with a little work. I would love to see Project Looking Glass on Fedora, but it cannot go into Fedora Extras at this time. -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64 at n-man.com http://www.n-man.com/ -- Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance! http://rate.affero.net/nman64/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 17:53:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:53:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176096] Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201753.jBKHrRBH026559@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176096 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-20 12:53 EST ------- - rpmlint doesn't like the license, but their FAQ states it can be packaged. http://scripts.sil.org/OFL - package meets naming guidelines, somewhat like urw-fonts - package meets packaging guidelines - license text in %doc - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (you may want to leave a comment about where to find the source) - package compiles on FC4 i386 - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Also similar to bitstream-vera-fonts spec file. Installed package, fonts appeared in char map and OpenOffice.org, gone upon package removal. Looks good to me. However, you still need a sponsor. Perhaps we can find one of them interested interested in fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 17:56:11 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:56:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175278] Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201756.jBKHuBgP027118@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gift-gnutella: gnutella plugin for giFT https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175278 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-20 12:56 EST ------- Just checked and gwebcaches, hostiles.txt already do get installed to /usr/share/giFT/Gnutella/ Is there something more that should/needs-to be done (packaging-wise)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From sopwith at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 18:01:25 2005 From: sopwith at redhat.com (Elliot Lee) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:01:25 -0500 (EST) Subject: Buildsys stuck? In-Reply-To: <1135100855.31481.46.camel@cutter> References: <43A78E7B.7010409@ieee.org> <20051220184056.26c5eccc@python2> <1135100855.31481.46.camel@cutter> Message-ID: On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, seth vidal wrote: > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 18:40 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote: > > Quentin Spencer wrote : > > > > > There are a couple of jobs that have been "building" for 8 hours now. > > > > The oldest started 22h ago now. Seems some kicking around is required :-) > > > > I kicked the plague-server. > > I can't kick the builders from here, though. Yes you can. :) Everyone in the sysadmin-main and sysadmin-build groups has the access necessary. Best, -- Elliot Red Hat Summit Nashville (May 30 - June 2, 2006) http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 18:03:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:03:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201803.jBKI3QIR028383@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-20 13:03 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > > Is there a precedent in Extras for calling perl modules (or anything else for > > > that matter) "distributable" in the absence of any specific licensing terms > > > being included upstream? > > Absence of copyright and licensing always means "legally questionable/use at > > your own risk", > > c.f. http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-pkgcopyright > > > > => This package probably qualifies as non-distributable. > > > > Another indication for the same, is this package seemingly missing from Debian > > (at least I could not find it). > > Isn't CPAN an exception? Well, may-be ... CPAN modules/dists definitely are well known to be widely used on various platforms, which might qualify all submissions as "implicitly licenced Perl, unless otherwise stated", but I would not bet on this. Courts probably would have to decide "in case", but I even doubt there is a precedence for such cases. All I can say, to be on the safe side as a packager, each package must be covered by _both_ a Copyright and a License notice. However, as only copyright holders are legitmated to sue you, it probably would have to be this perl-module's author to do so ;) I.e. I think, the risk of being sued for shipping/packaging this package is very low, however I don't think this package fulfills Fedora's narrow licensing contraints. May-be somebody from "Legal" will have give a statement on "if distribution perl-modules through CPAN implies licensed Perl unless otherwise stated" (I am inclined to think so.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From skvidal at linux.duke.edu Tue Dec 20 18:10:05 2005 From: skvidal at linux.duke.edu (seth vidal) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:10:05 -0500 Subject: Buildsys stuck? In-Reply-To: References: <43A78E7B.7010409@ieee.org> <20051220184056.26c5eccc@python2> <1135100855.31481.46.camel@cutter> Message-ID: <1135102206.31481.48.camel@cutter> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 13:01 -0500, Elliot Lee wrote: > On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, seth vidal wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 18:40 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote: > > > Quentin Spencer wrote : > > > > > > > There are a couple of jobs that have been "building" for 8 hours now. > > > > > > The oldest started 22h ago now. Seems some kicking around is required :-) > > > > > > > I kicked the plague-server. > > > > I can't kick the builders from here, though. > > Yes you can. :) Everyone in the sysadmin-main and sysadmin-build groups > has the access necessary. > ah, then I should rephrase. I actually didn't know where to login to do that :) -sv From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 18:14:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:14:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201814.jBKIEQ5f030027@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-20 13:14 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > May-be somebody from "Legal" will have give a statement on "if distribution > perl-modules through CPAN implies licensed Perl unless otherwise stated" > (I am inclined to think so.) My inclination seems to be wrong. c.f. http://www.cpan.org/misc/cpan-faq.html#How_is_Perl_licensed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 18:47:51 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:47:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171640] Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201847.jBKIlpvc004811@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate - Log to files that archive/rotate themselves https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171640 ------- Additional Comments From jpo at di.uminho.pt 2005-12-20 13:47 EST ------- Ralf, Thanks for the above link. I have just "pinged" the author. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From cmbullock at gmail.com Tue Dec 20 18:53:21 2005 From: cmbullock at gmail.com (Colin Bullock) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:53:21 -0600 Subject: Project Looking Glass In-Reply-To: <43A8436B.9050605@n-man.com> References: <43A8436B.9050605@n-man.com> Message-ID: Thanks for all the information. - Colin From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk Tue Dec 20 19:01:10 2005 From: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk (Paul F. Johnson) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:01:10 +0000 Subject: Scribus in rawhide In-Reply-To: <1135101739.4131.3.camel@yoda.loki.me> References: <1135101739.4131.3.camel@yoda.loki.me> Message-ID: <1135105270.6846.121.camel@T7.Linux> Hi, > > Could someone rebuild Scribus in Rawhide? It is dependant on a > > non-existant version of openssl. > > That would be an extras package. Best requested through the bugzilla > for Extras. How do I take over the ownership of this package - I've already said I would. Is it worth having Scribus 1.3.x in rawhide and 1.2 in the standard release? TTFN Paul -- main(t,_,a) char*a;{return!0 References: <43A8436B.9050605@n-man.com> Message-ID: <604aa7910512201145n710beb7bi1bc64815985f6046@mail.gmail.com> On 12/20/05, Colin Bullock wrote: > Thanks for all the information. Though I think you should take a jpackage.org to house looking glass packages meant to be compatible with fedora. -jef From qspencer at ieee.org Tue Dec 20 19:45:26 2005 From: qspencer at ieee.org (Quentin Spencer) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:45:26 -0600 Subject: Buildsys stuck? In-Reply-To: <1135100855.31481.46.camel@cutter> References: <43A78E7B.7010409@ieee.org> <20051220184056.26c5eccc@python2> <1135100855.31481.46.camel@cutter> Message-ID: <43A85F56.7070104@ieee.org> seth vidal wrote: >I kicked the plague-server. > >I can't kick the builders from here, though. > > Thanks to the kicking, it looks like a few packages got through, but now it appears to be stuck again. -Quentin From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 19:47:50 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:47:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176096] Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201947.jBKJloGk018085@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176096 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-20 14:47 EST ------- I would make two recommendations - 1) ass the following: Obsoletes: fonts-sil-gentium Provides: fonts-sil-gentium Reason: upstream provides an rpm with that name. It's up to you, but if upstream provides an rpm then I think it generally best to make sure that the Fedora rpm provides the same name. 2) I *think* you need to change if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts fi to if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts/gentium fi I seem to remember the fonts.cache-2 file not being properly created in FC5 when fc-cache is run on the %{_datadir}/fonts instead of the directory containing them. 3) I personally would get rid of %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/gentium Just use %{_datadir}/fonts/gentium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 19:54:06 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:54:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512201954.jBKJs60k019600@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2005-12-20 14:53 EST ------- OK, I've emailed the developer telling him about the situation. Hopefully he'll consider switching licenses. I don't agree that the package should automatically restart apache, though. Apache restarts are rarely sane, so I'd rather be cautious and let the admin do the restart on eir own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 20:44:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:44:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512202044.jBKKibP7029302@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-20 15:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > I don't agree that the package should automatically restart apache, though. > Apache restarts are rarely sane, so I'd rather be cautious and let the admin do > the restart on eir own. If they are installing the module, they can't use it unless they restart it. Furthermore, there is the update issue. Security hole found in package - update issued. Sysadmin has yum running as a service to update his system. He checks the rpm - thinks he's safe because it's at patch level, but since apache hasn't restarted he's vulnerable. -=- Any comments from packaging veterans on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 20:48:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:48:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176096] Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512202048.jBKKmQ3D029923@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176096 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-20 15:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I would make two recommendations - > > 1) ass the following: I'm so sorry. That's suppose to add the following :-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 20:58:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:58:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512202058.jBKKwd9v031688@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 ------- Additional Comments From icon at fedoraproject.org 2005-12-20 15:58 EST ------- Yeah, but this isn't any different from any other security update to apache. Currently, rpm -q --scripts httpd show: preinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh): # Add the "apache" user /usr/sbin/useradd -c "Apache" -u 48 \ -s /sbin/nologin -r -d /var/www apache 2> /dev/null || : postinstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh): # Register the httpd service /sbin/chkconfig --add httpd preuninstall scriptlet (using /bin/sh): if [ $1 = 0 ]; then /sbin/service httpd stop > /dev/null 2>&1 /sbin/chkconfig --del httpd fi If the main apache package isn't doing automatic restarts for updated packages, then I don't think an apache module package should act differently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From skvidal at linux.duke.edu Tue Dec 20 21:09:16 2005 From: skvidal at linux.duke.edu (seth vidal) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:09:16 -0500 Subject: Buildsys stuck? In-Reply-To: <43A85F56.7070104@ieee.org> References: <43A78E7B.7010409@ieee.org> <20051220184056.26c5eccc@python2> <1135100855.31481.46.camel@cutter> <43A85F56.7070104@ieee.org> Message-ID: <1135112956.31481.69.camel@cutter> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 13:45 -0600, Quentin Spencer wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > >I kicked the plague-server. > > > >I can't kick the builders from here, though. > > > > > > Thanks to the kicking, it looks like a few packages got through, but now > it appears to be stuck again. /kick -sv From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 21:18:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:18:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176288] New: Review Request: kdemulimedia-extras Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176288 Summary: Review Request: kdemulimedia-extras Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/kdemultimedia-extras-3.5.0-2.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/kdemultimedia-extras-3.5.0-2.src.rpm Description: Extras for KDE multimedia applications, including: * akode_artsplugin (akode), * juk (libtunepimp), * kfile-plugins: flac, mpc, mp3 (taglib), -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 22:10:50 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 17:10:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169704] Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512202210.jBKMAoh2014145@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169704 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-20 17:10 EST ------- Missing BuildRequires: gd-devel A few quick things rpmlint noticed after it did build with gd-devel: * rpmlint of mosml: Missing changelog. Why aren't the headers and devel files in a devel subpackage, are they required for using the program? * rpmlint of mosml-examples: No need for any win32 Makefile stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 22:27:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 17:27:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168838] Review Request: cpanspec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512202227.jBKMRC9F017734@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpanspec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168838 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2005-12-20 17:27 EST ------- Steven - Do you still have any interest in packaging these? Would be nice as I use it to package CPAN modules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs.michael at gmx.net Tue Dec 20 22:31:55 2005 From: bugs.michael at gmx.net (Michael Schwendt) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 23:31:55 +0100 Subject: major libgda and libgnomedb upgrade notice In-Reply-To: <1133191118.28831.104.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <438A1AD1.3050809@hhs.nl> <438AA1EE.7060002@hhs.nl> <1133159137.28831.59.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <1133160648.14977.6.camel@locolhost.localdomain> <438AC214.6050202@hhs.nl> <1133172510.28831.68.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <438AE6CA.8020509@hhs.nl> <1133178006.28831.76.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <438AF95A.5070904@hhs.nl> <1133184426.28831.83.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <604aa7910511280627k606ed79fm2b9932eec2f919ef@mail.gmail.com> <1133191118.28831.104.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <20051220233155.0cd98059.bugs.michael@gmx.net> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:18:37 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > You can: Ship compat packages. > > > > and then orphan them a week later? > > No, such packages would have to stay until ETA of a distribution, > because a package maintainer has no possibility to know what others are > doing with it. > > Think about it: It's same rationale why RH can't upgrade GNOME, KDE, GCC > or glibc during a distribution's life-time. Trying to wade through several hundreds of messages, I've failed to find a message which tells whether this topic has reached agreement. Publishing _reusable components_, which arbitrary users of Fedora Extras may decide to depend on, and then taking away these components later adds _fragility_. Both from a user and developer perspective. It is enough of a burden that this happens in Core, in upstream projects, and in 3rd party repositories occasionally, and that such breakage forces rebuilds and/or upgrades, which in turn break even more things. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 23:27:51 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:27:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172267] Review Request: srtp - An implementation of the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512202327.jBKNRptC029380@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: srtp - An implementation of the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172267 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-20 18:27 EST ------- Builds in mock, FC4 i386. Needs work: * rpmlint of srtp: Split the headers and developent libraries off into a seperate devel package. See Extras/PackageReviewGuidelines on the wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 20 23:28:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:28:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176288] Review Request: kdemulimedia-extras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512202328.jBKNS0Px029440@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdemulimedia-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176288 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2005-12-20 18:27 EST ------- quick check so far. I built on x86_64 Rawhide box. [dennis at rpclnx001 ~]$ rpmlint redhat/RPMS/x86_64/kdemultimedia-extras-3.5.0-2.x86_64.rpm E: kdemultimedia-extras obsolete-not-provided juk E: kdemultimedia-extras invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libarts_akode.so libarts_akode.so W: kdemultimedia-extras no-documentation we at least need to have the License in documentation i dont think the obsolete is needed. and not sure if the invalid-soname is a big deal. some bad [dennis at rpclnx001 SPECS]$ md5sum ../SOURCES/kdemultimedia-3.5.0.tar.bz2 3bead58887f06af59afabdc542532bb0 ../SOURCES/kdemultimedia-3.5.0.tar.bz2 [dennis at rpclnx001 SPECS]$ md5sum kdemultimedia-3.5.0.tar.bz2 dd0ba9ccb2f522508c6543cd24e54c98 kdemultimedia-3.5.0.tar.bz2 source md5sum doesnt match upstream if you used the tarball from the fedora package then it needs to be noted and not use the path to kde's website path to the upstream tarball is invalid it should be ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/3.5/src/kdemultimedia-3.5.0.tar.bz2 you cant substitute the stable/3.5/ for stable/%{version}/ im tryinga build now with upstream tarball. the akode patch fails to apply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 00:17:42 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:17:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512210017.jBL0Hgqi006126@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2005-12-20 19:17 EST ------- IMO doing anything to running services on package upgrades is generally evil. (occasionally a necessary evil, but not in this case). General case is that the admin may have made config changes which they do not yet want to apply. They may want to do a graceful restart to avoid kicking off active clients. etc. Doing an httpd restart for a module upgrade would definitely be very evil (imagine "yum update mod_foo mod_bar mod_baz ..."). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 00:59:44 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:59:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173388] Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512210059.jBL0xiLf011404@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Denial of Service evasion module for Apache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173388 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-20 19:59 EST ------- OK. That's fine then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 01:50:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 20:50:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172343] Review Request: libtomoe-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512210150.jBL1ok4k018381@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtomoe-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172343 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-20 20:50 EST ------- Build failed. checking for GTK2... configure: error: Package requirements (gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0) were not met: No package 'gtk+-2.0' found You will need BuildRequires: gtk2-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 03:54:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 22:54:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176288] Review Request: kdemulimedia-extras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512210354.jBL3sTI5009844@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdemulimedia-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176288 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-20 22:54 EST ------- Looks like upstream modified the tarball since they released it to packagers... * Wed Dec 21 2005 Rex Dieter 6:3.5.0-3 - Source: redownload, fix URL - %%doc: AUTHORS COPYING README - drop Obsoletes: junk http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/kdemultimedia-extras-3.5.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 05:22:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:22:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174181] Review Request: python-simpy Python simulation framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512210522.jBL5MOmR021642@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-simpy Python simulation framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174181 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-21 00:22 EST ------- SimGUI doesn't work, rpm isn't picking up that it needs Tkinter. Requires: tkinter needed. The spec file doesn't seem to be encoded in ASCII or URF-8. Please save in one or the other. file says "python-simpy.spec: lex description text" Follows python spec template - rpmlint does not output anything I would not call this python-simpy, simpy is sufficient, as it is not a python extension but a SIMulation in PYthon. Debian seems to call it python-simpy, however. Your choice. You removed the source documentation. Consider packaging it as a seperate docs subpackage. The patch removes all shebangs. Why, is this to quiet rpmlint? - license (LGPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC4 i386, is noarch - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 06:00:11 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 01:00:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167714] Review Request: pam_usb: PAM module for use with DSA key pairs and removable devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512210600.jBL60BvZ027134@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_usb: PAM module for use with DSA key pairs and removable devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167714 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2005-12-21 01:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Does it mean that pam_usb-hotplug will not work under FC5 completely? > In other words, should we do separate things for FC5 or not? That's how I understand it. When using udev on FC4 the -hotplug package isn't needed either. Depending on which older releases you want to package this for, you could possibly get rid of the -hotplug package altogether. btw, I finally got around to running this package and it works great. :) The only other suggestion that I would have is to include a couple of sample pam.d configuration files in %doc that show how it should be used in Fedora Core 4. For example, I had to add the following just before the pam_stack.so line in /etc/pam.d/login: auth sufficient pam_usb.so check_if_mounted mount_opts=ro quiet but had to use the following in /etc/pam.d/gdm: auth sufficient pam_usb.so check_if_mounted mount_opts=ro allow_remote ...and still haven't gotten /etc/pam.d/xscreensaver to work right. In debug mode the logs indicate that authentication succeeds, but it doesn't actually log me back in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 07:20:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 02:20:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169624] Review Request: TestDisk, tool to check and undelete partition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512210720.jBL7KOEd003806@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TestDisk, tool to check and undelete partition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169624 grenier at cgsecurity.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://www.cgsecurity.org/fc|http://www.cgsecurity.org/fc |extra/testdisk-5.9-1.src.rpm|extra/testdisk-6.2-1.src.rpm ------- Additional Comments From grenier at cgsecurity.org 2005-12-21 02:20 EST ------- Updated to version 6.2 SRPM Url: http://www.cgsecurity.org/fcextra/testdisk-6.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 10:12:04 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 05:12:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165955] Review Request: grads Grid Analysis and Display System In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512211012.jBLAC4Qs032395@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: grads Grid Analysis and Display System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165955 pertusus at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr 2005-12-21 05:12 EST ------- The upstream maintainers are now fully aware and concerned by the licence issues, so hopefully this should be solved in the future. It builds in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From pertusus at free.fr Wed Dec 21 10:32:23 2005 From: pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:32:23 +0100 Subject: f771 bus error in devel x86_64 Message-ID: <20051221103223.GA2721@free.fr> Hello, On x86_64 (and always on hammer2.fedora.redhat.com, if it turns out to be hardware related) I get a reproducible failure when trying a rebuild of the cernlib. I tried 3 builds and the 3 builds stopped with an error, for 3 different files. The error is: g77: Internal error: Bus error (program f771) Please submit a full bug report. The 3 files are very simple subroutines, so I believe there is an issue somewhere else. The error happened after 8, 9 and 11 minutes. The builds are build 2079, 2080 and 2081. -- Pat From bugs.michael at gmx.net Wed Dec 21 11:23:54 2005 From: bugs.michael at gmx.net (Michael Schwendt) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:23:54 +0100 Subject: f2c/libf2c In-Reply-To: <1135044997.2798.47.camel@locolhost.localdomain> References: <1135040656.6846.59.camel@T7.Linux> <1135044997.2798.47.camel@locolhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20051221122354.49d703b2.bugs.michael@gmx.net> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:16:37 -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote: > On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 01:04 +0000, Paul wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm considering packaging f2c and libf2c for extras, but have a couple > > of questions. > > > > First, neither has a configure file, just copy the makefile.u to > > makefile and alter the odd parameter inside (libf2c). Am I okay to copy > > the file from within the spec file and then run a patch against it? > > I haven't seen the Makefile > It would be better imho to modify the Makefile with sed so that macros > can be used - IE > > cp Makefile Makefile.orig > cat Makefile.orig |sed -e s?"^PREFIX=stuff"?"PREFIX=%{_prefix}" or > whatever. Maybe, maybe not. ;) If the Makefile template ever changes in a way that would require different substitutions, the sed commands will fail silently. On the contrary, the patch will likely be rejected, causing the build to fail, which will tell you that you need to revisit the Makefile in order to create a new patch. If, however, you verify your substitutions everytime you do a version upgrade in your packages, using sed -i or perl -i can be a time-saver, albeit with the risk of breaking unexpectedly. From bugs.michael at gmx.net Wed Dec 21 12:26:30 2005 From: bugs.michael at gmx.net (Michael Schwendt) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:26:30 +0100 Subject: Buildsys problems ? In-Reply-To: <1132263737.3599.16.camel@bureau.maison> References: <1132254953.3599.2.camel@bureau.maison> <604aa7910511171257o2f5adeb9q55a81b52b9eedf71@mail.gmail.com> <1132263737.3599.16.camel@bureau.maison> Message-ID: <20051221132630.6e600d19.bugs.michael@gmx.net> On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:42:17 +0100, Eric Tanguy wrote: > > the buildlog reference you provide clearly shows the dos2unix > > problem..but I don't see anything in the log that gives me information > > about the openssl-devel problem you say exists. > Concerning the dos2unix problem, how could i solve it ? Is it a dos2unix > problem in FC3 ? Can you reproduce it? Then file a bug report. dos2unix should not segfault. From bugs.michael at gmx.net Wed Dec 21 12:33:02 2005 From: bugs.michael at gmx.net (Michael Schwendt) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:33:02 +0100 Subject: common tobuild,..... In-Reply-To: <1133567146.5634.6.camel@ignacio.lan> References: <200512022309.jB2N9CIW009323@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <1133567146.5634.6.camel@ignacio.lan> Message-ID: <20051221133302.08f5cbf4.bugs.michael@gmx.net> On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:45:45 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > On ..., ... at ..., ... wrote: > > request build of... > > Just out of curiosity *why* is this file not dead yet? Because everyone needs to update also the "common" directory in every checked out working-copy of a package before running "make build". From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 12:56:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:56:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174181] Review Request: python-simpy Python simulation framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512211256.jBLCu2Kt029131@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-simpy Python simulation framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174181 ------- Additional Comments From sarantis at cnl.di.uoa.gr 2005-12-21 07:55 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > SimGUI doesn't work, rpm isn't picking up that it needs Tkinter. Requires: > tkinter needed. done. > The spec file doesn't seem to be encoded in ASCII or URF-8. Please save in one > or the other. file says "python-simpy.spec: lex description text" It is ASCII though. file -i says python-simpy.spec: text/x-java; charset=us-ascii I think the first lines confuse the guessing done by file's logic. > - rpmlint does not output anything > > I would not call this python-simpy, simpy is sufficient, as it is not a python > extension but a SIMulation in PYthon. Debian seems to call it python-simpy, > however. Your choice. It is not a standalone application, but a simulation framework. One writes simulations in python using this framework, so I think I'll keep the name. > You removed the source documentation. Consider packaging it as a seperate docs > subpackage. done. > The patch removes all shebangs. Why, is this to quiet rpmlint? Yes. I have no strong feelings on this, I can remove it. The modules from which the shebangs are removed are not supposed to be executed directly, and some example scripts I wrote did not show any problems with this patch. I'll take it upstream anyway to see what the authors think. Thanks for the review. New versions: http://gallagher.di.uoa.gr/rpms/python-simpy/python-simpy.spec http://gallagher.di.uoa.gr/rpms/python-simpy/python-simpy-1.6.1-2.src.rpm http://gallagher.di.uoa.gr/rpms/python-simpy/python-simpy-1.6.1-2.noarch.rpm http://gallagher.di.uoa.gr/rpms/python-simpy/python-simpy-doc-1.6.1-2.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From dennis at ausil.us Wed Dec 21 13:07:44 2005 From: dennis at ausil.us (Dennis Gilmore) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:07:44 -0600 Subject: Fwd: fedora-extras-commits mailing list probe message Message-ID: <200512210708.07795.dennis@ausil.us> ive been getting one of these emails pretty much every week for awhile now. they are all from emails sent to extras-commits list the encaptulated message im getting back starts with so question is what needs to be done to fix this INVALID HEADER (INVALID CHARACTERS OR SPACE GAP) Non-encoded 8-bit data (char C3 hex) in message header 'Old-From': Old-From: "Ralf Cors\303\251pius" http://www.ausil.us -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Christian.Iseli at licr.org Wed Dec 21 13:11:18 2005 From: Christian.Iseli at licr.org (Christian.Iseli at licr.org) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:11:18 +0100 Subject: Scribus in rawhide In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 Dec 2005 19:01:10 GMT." <1135105270.6846.121.camel@T7.Linux> Message-ID: <200512211311.jBLDBIJM005425@ludwig-alpha.unil.ch> paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk said: > How do I take over the ownership of this package - I've already said I would. Provided it's agreed with the current maintainer (compton at pcompton.com), I think you simply need to update the owners.list Christian From paul at city-fan.org Wed Dec 21 13:12:33 2005 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:12:33 +0000 Subject: Fwd: fedora-extras-commits mailing list probe message In-Reply-To: <200512210708.07795.dennis@ausil.us> References: <200512210708.07795.dennis@ausil.us> Message-ID: <43A954C1.40701@city-fan.org> Dennis Gilmore wrote: > ive been getting one of these emails pretty much every week for awhile now. > they are all from emails sent to extras-commits list the encaptulated > message im getting back starts with so question is what needs to be done to > fix this > > INVALID HEADER (INVALID CHARACTERS OR SPACE GAP) > > Non-encoded 8-bit data (char C3 hex) in message header 'Old-From': Old-From: > "Ralf Cors\303\251pius" Non-encoded 8-bit data (char C3 hex) in message header 'From': From: "Ralf > Cors\303\251pius" (corsepi... http://bugzilla.redhat.com/163229 Paul. From paul at city-fan.org Wed Dec 21 13:19:12 2005 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:19:12 +0000 Subject: Backporting packages to older distros Message-ID: <43A95650.80102@city-fan.org> I see that perl-String-CRC32 was added to rawhide yesterday; this module was on my to-do list for Extras as it's a dep of another module I want to use. Obviously I won't need to introduce it on the devel branch but I'd like to have it on the FC-4 branch. What's the procedure for doing this? Introduce the package as normal, then request the FC-4 branch and removal of the devel branch on the Extras/CVSSync Needed page? Paul. From bugs.michael at gmx.net Wed Dec 21 13:23:58 2005 From: bugs.michael at gmx.net (Michael Schwendt) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:23:58 +0100 Subject: wxGTK and wxPython 2.6 -- please check out In-Reply-To: <20051129123611.GA28524@jadzia.bu.edu> References: <20051124172239.GA13237@jadzia.bu.edu> <20051128202111.GA20991@jadzia.bu.edu> <1133210676.9376.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051128204938.GA22736@jadzia.bu.edu> <20051129123611.GA28524@jadzia.bu.edu> Message-ID: <20051221142358.7ba5fe9e.bugs.michael@gmx.net> On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 07:36:11 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 03:49:38PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > Also -- I want to rename the python package back to wxPython, instead > > > > of wxPythonGTK2, to follow the normal practice of keeping the package > > > > name matching the upstream source tarball. Does anyone have an > > > > argument against that? > > > Food for thought at https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=927 > > > comment 6 onwards. Note that comment 12 mentions upstream _packages_ > > > being (having been?) wxPythonGTK* even though the tarball is wxPython. > > Yeah, I think upstream came around to sanity after that conversation. :) > > So, anyway, the second question: how does one actually accomplish this in > the Extras buildsystem? Both the "old" and "new" names exist; I want to > revert back to the old one.... In case you meant asking how to do this within CVS, the wxPython module and its FC-4 and FC-3 branches still exist but are empty. You can copy the package files from the wxPython2 directory except for the Makefile, rename the spec file, change the %{name} and add/change the relevant "Provides" and "Obsoletes" including version and release (so your wxPython packages upgrade the older wxPythonGTK2 packages). From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 14:01:30 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176096] Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512211401.jBLE1UCY007141@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176096 ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2005-12-21 09:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > - source matches upstream (you may want to leave a comment about where to find the source) Done. (In reply to comment #3) > 1) add the following: > > Obsoletes: fonts-sil-gentium > Provides: fonts-sil-gentium Done. > I *think* you need to change > > if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then > %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts > fi > > to > > if [ -x %{_bindir}/fc-cache ]; then > %{_bindir}/fc-cache %{_datadir}/fonts/gentium > fi But that will fail to register the gentium directory in %{_datadir}/fonts/fonts.cache-1, won't it? > 3) I personally would get rid of > > %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/gentium > > Just use %{_datadir}/fonts/gentium I prefer to stay with it, to minimize possible mistakes when in a later version one mistakenly writes "genitum". New package is posted at: Spec Url: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/gentium-fonts.spec SRPM Url: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/gentium-fonts-1.02-2.src.rpm BTW, Daniel Veillard has now sponsored me for cvsextras access, so I just need the package itself to be accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 14:02:55 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:02:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176096] Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512211402.jBLE2tAI007389@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176096 ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2005-12-21 09:02 EST ------- I forgot to post the ChangeLog: %changelog * Wed Dec 21 2005 Roozbeh Porunader 1.02-2 - Added comment to Source0 about where to get the file - Added Provides and Obsoletes for upsteam RPM name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 14:16:55 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:16:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170504] Review Request: makebootfat - Utility for creation bootable FAT disk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512211416.jBLEGtxA009585@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makebootfat - Utility for creation bootable FAT disk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170504 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-21 09:16 EST ------- > Perhaps we even should specify ExclusiveArch tag... Assume not, IMHO makebootfat executable can be run on any arch, just the result (a disk image) seems to be x86-dependent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From katzj at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 14:24:14 2005 From: katzj at redhat.com (Jeremy Katz) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:24:14 -0500 Subject: common tobuild,..... In-Reply-To: <20051221133302.08f5cbf4.bugs.michael@gmx.net> References: <200512022309.jB2N9CIW009323@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <1133567146.5634.6.camel@ignacio.lan> <20051221133302.08f5cbf4.bugs.michael@gmx.net> Message-ID: <43A9658E.9080108@redhat.com> Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:45:45 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > >> On ..., ... at ..., ... wrote: >>> request build of... >> Just out of curiosity *why* is this file not dead yet? > > Because everyone needs to update also the "common" directory in > every checked out working-copy of a package before running "make build". Actually, I could "fix" things by removing the commit acl for tobuild. In fact, that will be done as soon as I type "cvs commit" Jeremy From rdieter at math.unl.edu Wed Dec 21 14:27:39 2005 From: rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 08:27:39 -0600 Subject: Backporting packages to older distros In-Reply-To: <43A95650.80102@city-fan.org> References: <43A95650.80102@city-fan.org> Message-ID: Paul Howarth wrote: > I see that perl-String-CRC32 was added to rawhide yesterday; this module > was on my to-do list for Extras as it's a dep of another module I want > to use. Obviously I won't need to introduce it on the devel branch but > I'd like to have it on the FC-4 branch. What's the procedure for doing > this? Introduce the package as normal, then request the FC-4 branch and > removal of the devel branch on the Extras/CVSSync Needed page? Sounds reasonable to me. -- Rex From jpo at di.uminho.pt Wed Dec 21 14:44:58 2005 From: jpo at di.uminho.pt (Jose Pedro Oliveira) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:44:58 -0000 (WET) Subject: Backporting packages to older distros In-Reply-To: <43A95650.80102@city-fan.org> References: <43A95650.80102@city-fan.org> Message-ID: <39735.193.137.16.172.1135176298.squirrel@webmail.lsd.di.uminho.pt> > I see that perl-String-CRC32 was added to rawhide yesterday; To be correct it has been in rawhide for several weeks now: it has been provided by the lftp v3.3.x RPM (see #176175). > Obviously I won't need to introduce it on the devel branch but > I'd like to have it on the FC-4 branch. What's the procedure for doing > this? Introduce the package as normal, then request the FC-4 branch and > removal of the devel branch on the Extras/CVSSync Needed page? Sounds right but with one limitation you have to keep FC-4 RPM E:NVR less or equal than the one in Core in order to avoid upgrade problems. jpo -- Jos? Pedro Oliveira * mailto: jpo at di.uminho.pt * http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/~jpo * * gpg fingerprint = F9B6 8D87 859D 1C94 48F0 84C0 9749 9EB5 91BD 851B * From jpo at di.uminho.pt Wed Dec 21 14:44:58 2005 From: jpo at di.uminho.pt (Jose Pedro Oliveira) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:44:58 -0000 (WET) Subject: Backporting packages to older distros In-Reply-To: <43A95650.80102@city-fan.org> References: <43A95650.80102@city-fan.org> Message-ID: <39735.193.137.16.172.1135176298.squirrel@webmail.lsd.di.uminho.pt> > I see that perl-String-CRC32 was added to rawhide yesterday; To be correct it has been in rawhide for several weeks now: it has been provided by the lftp v3.3.x RPM (see #176175). > Obviously I won't need to introduce it on the devel branch but > I'd like to have it on the FC-4 branch. What's the procedure for doing > this? Introduce the package as normal, then request the FC-4 branch and > removal of the devel branch on the Extras/CVSSync Needed page? Sounds right but with one limitation you have to keep FC-4 RPM E:NVR less or equal than the one in Core in order to avoid upgrade problems. jpo -- Jos? Pedro Oliveira * mailto: jpo at di.uminho.pt * http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/~jpo * * gpg fingerprint = F9B6 8D87 859D 1C94 48F0 84C0 9749 9EB5 91BD 851B * From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 15:15:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:15:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176331] New: Review Request: hplip - HP Linux Imaging and Printing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176331 Summary: Review Request: hplip - HP Linux Imaging and Printing Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: kas at fi.muni.cz QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: ftp://ftp.linux.cz/pub/linux/people/jan_kasprzak/hplip/hplip.spec SRPM Name or Url: ftp://ftp.linux.cz/pub/linux/people/jan_kasprzak/hplip/hplip-0.9.7.2-1.src.rpm Description: HP Linux Imaging and Printing (http://hpinkjet.sourceforge.net/) allows to use HP multifunction printers/scanners/faxes under Linux. It is designed for use together with hpijs (which is included in the hplip source). I have put hpijs files for compatibility to a separate subpackage. I am seeking a sponsor for this package. I have tested it on i386 and x86_64 against HP OfficeJet 7410 all-in-one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 15:26:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:26:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176331] Review Request: hplip - HP Linux Imaging and Printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512211526.jBLFQExv022062@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hplip - HP Linux Imaging and Printing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176331 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2005-12-21 10:26 EST ------- Isn't this in Fedora Core Rawhide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 15:27:40 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:27:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176331] Review Request: hplip - HP Linux Imaging and Printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512211527.jBLFRenC022318@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hplip - HP Linux Imaging and Printing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176331 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2005-12-21 10:27 EST ------- And it is in Fedora Core 4 - updates-testing. So there is no real need to put this in Fedora Extras IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 15:32:10 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176331] Review Request: hplip - HP Linux Imaging and Printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512211532.jBLFWAid023339@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hplip - HP Linux Imaging and Printing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176331 ------- Additional Comments From kas at fi.muni.cz 2005-12-21 10:31 EST ------- OK, never mind then. I did not notice it is in updates-testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From sailer at sailer.dynip.lugs.ch Wed Dec 21 15:37:56 2005 From: sailer at sailer.dynip.lugs.ch (Thomas Sailer) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:37:56 +0100 Subject: ghdl: moving libraries into their own subpackages Message-ID: <1135179476.3639.51.camel@playstation2.hb9jnx.ampr.org> I'm maintaining ghdl, a VHDL compiler based on gcc. Now I would like to move the runtime libraries needed to link a VHDL program into an executable into their own binary subpackage libgrt, like gcc does with libgcc. What is the correct process to do this? Is there some review required or can I just do it? The reason for this is that I would like to be able to support compiling 32bit binaries on x86_64 with ghdl -m32 (like gcc...), but the FE buildsys does not allow 32bit binaries to be built on x86_64. So the user would have to install libgrt.x86_64 and libgrt.i386 (from the i386 build) to be able to build both 64bit and 32bit programs on amd64. Tom From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 15:55:13 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:55:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168838] Review Request: cpanspec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512211555.jBLFtDJ7028454@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpanspec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168838 ------- Additional Comments From steve at silug.org 2005-12-21 10:54 EST ------- All I need is a review... :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Wed Dec 21 16:12:00 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:12:00 +0100 Subject: Backporting packages to older distros In-Reply-To: <39735.193.137.16.172.1135176298.squirrel@webmail.lsd.di.uminho.pt> References: <43A95650.80102@city-fan.org> <39735.193.137.16.172.1135176298.squirrel@webmail.lsd.di.uminho.pt> Message-ID: <1135181521.12394.244.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 14:44 +0000, Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote: > > I see that perl-String-CRC32 was added to rawhide yesterday; > > Obviously I won't need to introduce it on the devel branch but > > I'd like to have it on the FC-4 branch. What's the procedure for doing > > this? Introduce the package as normal, then request the FC-4 branch and > > removal of the devel branch on the Extras/CVSSync Needed page? > > Sounds right but with one limitation you have to keep FC-4 RPM > E:NVR less or equal than the one in Core in order to avoid upgrade problems. Another limitation is bugzilla ownership. Ralf From paul at city-fan.org Wed Dec 21 16:19:33 2005 From: paul at city-fan.org (Paul Howarth) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:19:33 +0000 Subject: Backporting packages to older distros In-Reply-To: <1135181521.12394.244.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <43A95650.80102@city-fan.org> <39735.193.137.16.172.1135176298.squirrel@webmail.lsd.di.uminho.pt> <1135181521.12394.244.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <43A98095.9070109@city-fan.org> Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 14:44 +0000, Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote: > >>>I see that perl-String-CRC32 was added to rawhide yesterday; > > >>>Obviously I won't need to introduce it on the devel branch but >>>I'd like to have it on the FC-4 branch. What's the procedure for doing >>>this? Introduce the package as normal, then request the FC-4 branch and >>>removal of the devel branch on the Extras/CVSSync Needed page? >> >>Sounds right but with one limitation you have to keep FC-4 RPM >>E:NVR less or equal than the one in Core in order to avoid upgrade problems. > > Another limitation is bugzilla ownership. Would that actually be a problem? Couldn't there be a different owner for the Extras package and the Core package - aren't they separate components as far as bugzilla is concerned? Paul. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 16:16:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:16:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175748] Review Request: cacti In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512211616.jBLGGYUc001103@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cacti https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175748 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2005-12-21 11:16 EST ------- Spec Url: http://preview.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/cacti/cacti.spec SRPM Url: http://preview.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/cacti/cacti-0.8.6g-6.src.rpm I've made the changes above and used the "quick hack" from the SELinux thread. I'm sure there's got to be a more approperate way to do this. Any ideas anyone? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 16:25:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:25:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168838] Review Request: cpanspec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512211625.jBLGP8sn003361@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cpanspec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168838 ------- Additional Comments From orion at cora.nwra.com 2005-12-21 11:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > All I need is a review... :-) See comment 1 for my first question. I would suggest Development/Tools group and I'm pretty sure we need an upstream source for tarballs for verification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 16:26:44 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:26:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173181] Review Request: buoh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512211626.jBLGQiAO003868@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buoh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173181 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2005-12-21 11:26 EST ------- Just a couple of comments: The line rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should be at the start of %install, not at the end of %prep. The line unset GCONF_DISABLE_MAKEFILE_SCHEMA_INSTALL shouldn't be necessary since each rpm section executes in a separate shell script. Env. variables set in one section aren't preserved in the next. I notice that it requires gtk-2.7. This is newer than the gtk-2.6.10 provided by FC-4. Do you plan to package this for FC-4, or just devel? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From orion at cora.nwra.com Wed Dec 21 16:56:23 2005 From: orion at cora.nwra.com (Orion Poplawski) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:56:23 -0700 Subject: Are recently built extras packages publicly available? Message-ID: <43A98937.8050502@cora.nwra.com> We used to have http://extras64.linux.duke.edu/plague-results/development/. Is there a replacement? Thanks! -- Orion Poplawski System Administrator 303-415-9701 x222 Colorado Research Associates/NWRA FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane, Boulder CO 80301 http://www.co-ra.com From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Wed Dec 21 17:22:20 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:22:20 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051221172220.71C297FE6@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 16 bittorrent-4.2.2-1.fc3 bittorrent-4.2.2-2.fc3 blacs-1.1-18.fc3 cernlib-2005-11.fc3.2 digikam-0.8.0-1.fc3 enca-1.9-1.fc3 fpc-2.0.2-3.fc3 inkscape-0.43-1.fc3 l2tpd-0.69-0.2.20051030.fc3 openslp-1.2.1-4.fc3 perl-Class-ErrorHandler-0.01-2.fc3 perl-Params-Util-0.08-1.fc3 plt-scheme-300-1.fc3 pybliographer-1.2.7-2.fc3 rxvt-unicode-5.9-1.fc3 tinyerp-3.1.1-5.fc3 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From rc040203 at freenet.de Wed Dec 21 17:25:20 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:25:20 +0100 Subject: Backporting packages to older distros In-Reply-To: <43A98095.9070109@city-fan.org> References: <43A95650.80102@city-fan.org> <39735.193.137.16.172.1135176298.squirrel@webmail.lsd.di.uminho.pt> <1135181521.12394.244.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <43A98095.9070109@city-fan.org> Message-ID: <1135185920.12394.252.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 16:19 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote: > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 14:44 +0000, Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote: > > > >>>I see that perl-String-CRC32 was added to rawhide yesterday; > > > > > >>>Obviously I won't need to introduce it on the devel branch but > >>>I'd like to have it on the FC-4 branch. What's the procedure for doing > >>>this? Introduce the package as normal, then request the FC-4 branch and > >>>removal of the devel branch on the Extras/CVSSync Needed page? > >> > >>Sounds right but with one limitation you have to keep FC-4 RPM > >>E:NVR less or equal than the one in Core in order to avoid upgrade problems. > > > > Another limitation is bugzilla ownership. > > Would that actually be a problem? Well, the RH bugzilla maintainers would have to answer this. All I can say, as a user, the first problem you'd encounter is "Which 'product' does the package belong to, "Fedora Core" or "Fedora Extras"? I don't know if bugzilla allows the same package to be member of the same 'product'. Presuming this works, to whom would bugs be assigned and who is supposed to fix them? A normal FE maintainer can't fix bugs in FC, the question here is, whether the FC maintainer is legitimated to alter files in FE. > Couldn't there be a different owner > for the Extras package and the Core package - aren't they separate > components as far as bugzilla is concerned? The RH bugzilla maintainer would have to answer this. Ralf From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 17:28:40 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:28:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176205] Review Request: GZLauncher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512211728.jBLHSerB018031@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GZLauncher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176205 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-21 12:28 EST ------- Missing BuildRequires: gtk2-devel This is what shows up in the build log: checking for gtk+-2.0 >= 2.0.0... Package gtk+-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `gtk+-2.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'gtk+-2.0' found configure: error: Library requirements (gtk+-2.0 >= 2.0.0) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. In fact, you can skip BuildRequires: gtk2 and change it to gtk2-devel. rpm is good at finding what libraries things require, but not at the -devel packages required. Also change curl to curl-devel. Drop the auto tools if you're not going to run them before configure. So in the end we have BuildRequires: gtk2-devel curl-devel desktop-file-utils Don't own %{_datadir}/applications, filesystem owns that. You can use %{_datadir}/applications/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From katzj at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 18:07:47 2005 From: katzj at redhat.com (Jeremy Katz) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:07:47 -0500 Subject: Are recently built extras packages publicly available? In-Reply-To: <43A98937.8050502@cora.nwra.com> References: <43A98937.8050502@cora.nwra.com> Message-ID: <1135188467.24295.0.camel@bree.local.net> On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 09:56 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > We used to have > http://extras64.linux.duke.edu/plague-results/development/. Is there a > replacement? Check out http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/plague-results/fedora-development-extras/ The path just changed when we updated to plague 0.4 a month or so ago Jeremy From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Wed Dec 21 18:07:52 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:07:52 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051221180752.99BD67FE6@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 25 bittorrent-4.2.2-1.fc4 bittorrent-4.2.2-2.fc4 blacs-1.1-18.fc4 cernlib-2005-11.fc4.2 enca-1.9-1.fc4 fpc-2.0.2-3.fc4 ghdl-0.21-1.fc4 ghdl-0.22-0.38svn.0.fc4 irssi-0.8.10-0.2.rc8.fc4 irssi-0.8.10-1.fc4 jpgraph-2.0-1.fc4 l2tpd-0.69-0.2.20051030.fc4 lapack-3.0-36.fc4 libtunepimp-0.4.0-4.fc4 moin-1.3.5-3.fc4 openslp-1.2.1-4.fc4 perl-Class-ErrorHandler-0.01-2.fc4 perl-DBIx-DBSchema-0.28-2.fc4 perl-Params-Util-0.08-1.fc4 plt-scheme-300-1.fc4 pybliographer-1.2.7-2.fc4 rxvt-unicode-5.9-1.fc4 synergy-1.2.7-1.fc4 tinyerp-3.1.1-5.fc4 xmlrpc-c-1.04-1.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk Wed Dec 21 18:09:17 2005 From: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk (Paul) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:09:17 +0000 Subject: f2c/libf2c Q Message-ID: <1135188557.3343.53.camel@T7.Linux> Hi, Neither of the original downloads have version numbers attached to the archives, but are dated internally as 20050501. I've put that as the version, but when I try to build, it obviously falls over. Is there a way around this? TTFN Paul -- main(t,_,a) char*a;{return!0 From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Wed Dec 21 18:50:10 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 13:50:10 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051221185010.DC1997FE6@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 46 apcupsd-3.10.18-6.fc5 atlas-3.6.0-9.fc5 bittorrent-4.2.2-1.fc5 bittorrent-4.2.2-2.fc5 blacs-1.1-18.fc5 cernlib-2005-11.fc5.3 cppunit-1.11.4-1.fc5 cvsgraph-1.6.0-1.fc5 enca-1.9-1.fc5 fpc-2.0.2-3.fc5 gdesklets-0.35.2-24.fc5 ghdl-0.21-1.fc5 ghdl-0.22-0.38svn.0.fc5 gift-0.11.8.1-3.fc5 gift-openft-0.2.1.6-2.fc5 glibmm24-2.8.3-1 gnupg2-1.9.20-1.fc5 grads-1.9b4-5.fc5.1 gv-3.6.1-5.fc5 hdf-4.2r1-6.fc5 jpgraph-2.0-1.fc5 kasablanca-0.4.0.2-6.fc5 kdesvn-0.7.1-3.fc5 lapack-3.0-36.fc5 ldns-1.0.0-8.fc5 libtunepimp-0.4.0-5.fc5 moin-1.3.5-3.fc5 octave-2.9.4-4.fc5 openslp-1.2.1-4.fc5 paps-0.6.2-1.fc5 perl-DBIx-DBSchema-0.28-2.fc5 perl-Params-Util-0.08-1.fc5 plt-scheme-300-2.fc5 pybliographer-1.2.7-2.fc5 qps-1.9.11-2.1.fc5 rxvt-unicode-5.9-1.fc5 synergy-1.2.7-1.fc5 syslog-ng-1.6.9-2.fc5 ufsparse-0.92-2.fc5 uim-1.0.0-0.2.beta.fc5 x3270-3.3.4p6-4.fc5 xforms-1.0.90-4.fc5 xlockmore-5.20.1-1.fc5 xmlrpc-c-1.04-1.fc5 xmms-1.2.10-18.1.fc5 yumex-0.45-1.0.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From orion at cora.nwra.com Wed Dec 21 19:15:42 2005 From: orion at cora.nwra.com (Orion Poplawski) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:15:42 -0700 Subject: Are recently built extras packages publicly available? In-Reply-To: <1135188467.24295.0.camel@bree.local.net> References: <43A98937.8050502@cora.nwra.com> <1135188467.24295.0.camel@bree.local.net> Message-ID: <43A9A9DE.3010000@cora.nwra.com> Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 09:56 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > >>We used to have >>http://extras64.linux.duke.edu/plague-results/development/. Is there a >>replacement? > > > Check out > http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/plague-results/fedora-development-extras/ > > The path just changed when we updated to plague 0.4 a month or so ago > > Jeremy > Thanks. Hopefully this will make it into the next mock release too... -- Orion Poplawski System Administrator 303-415-9701 x222 Colorado Research Associates/NWRA FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane, Boulder CO 80301 http://www.co-ra.com From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com Wed Dec 21 19:36:46 2005 From: jonathan.underwood at gmail.com (Jonathan Underwood) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:36:46 +0000 Subject: Becoming a contributor and FC(release-1) and FC(release+1) branches Message-ID: <645d17210512211136n4d475b8cu@mail.gmail.com> Hi I have accumulated a number of packages which I'd like to contribute to extras. However, at any given moment, I am only ever running the current release of fedora, and don't have access to machines running the previous version or rawhide. My question is, is it OK to contribute packages without adding branches for the previously released version or the development version? I have looked through the wiki pages, but couldn't figure out if this was a requirement or not. Thanks, Jonathan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ivazquez at ivazquez.net Wed Dec 21 19:47:56 2005 From: ivazquez at ivazquez.net (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:47:56 -0500 Subject: Becoming a contributor and FC(release-1) and FC(release+1) branches In-Reply-To: <645d17210512211136n4d475b8cu@mail.gmail.com> References: <645d17210512211136n4d475b8cu@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1135194476.1969.4.camel@ignacio.lan> On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 19:36 +0000, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > I have accumulated a number of packages which I'd like to contribute > to extras. However, at any given moment, I am only ever running the > current release of fedora, and don't have access to machines running > the previous version or rawhide. My question is, is it OK to > contribute packages without adding branches for the previously > released version or the development version? I have looked through the > wiki pages, but couldn't figure out if this was a requirement or not. Previous versions are at the packager's discretion. devel should be mandatory unless a) the app doesn't run on Rawhide and never will, or b) the package is in Rawhide. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 21:17:05 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:17:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176373] New: Review Request: ytalk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176373 Summary: Review Request: ytalk Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: imlinux at gmail.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Url: http://testapp1.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/ytalk/ytalk.spec SRPM Url: http://testapp1.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/ytalk/ytalk-3.3.0-2.src.rpm Description: The YTalk program is essentially a chat program for multiple users. YTalk works just like the UNIX talk program and even communicates with the same talk daemon(s), but YTalk allows for multiple connections (unlike UNIX talk). YTalk also supports redirection of program output to other users as well as an easy-to-use menu of commands. Misc: I was sad to see ytalk go in FC4 so hopefully we'll be able to get it into Extras. My main concern with this is the License. For some reason it changed from BSD to GPL. This just sounds odd to me (From the bottom of the INSTALL file): --------------------------------------- Most of these installation instructions are taken word-for-word from the `INSTALL' file that comes with GNU Wget. This means that, unlike the rest of the YTalk package (which is freely copyable as long as the copyright notices are kept in the sources), this file is (probably) covered by the GNU General Public License version 2. ---------------------------------------- I'm no license guru so I'm not sure if any GPL/BSD violations are going on: maintainer website: http://www.impul.se/ytalk/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk Wed Dec 21 21:21:00 2005 From: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk (Paul F. Johnson) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:21:00 +0000 Subject: Scribus in rawhide In-Reply-To: <200512211311.jBLDBIJM005425@ludwig-alpha.unil.ch> References: <200512211311.jBLDBIJM005425@ludwig-alpha.unil.ch> Message-ID: <1135200060.3232.5.camel@T7.Linux> Hi, > Provided it's agreed with the current maintainer (compton at pcompton.com), I > think you simply need to update the owners.list I've got the okay from the current maintainer to take over the packaging of Scribus. What do I need to do next? TTFN Paul -- main(t,_,a) char*a;{return!0 Message-ID: <200512212123.jBLLN6IM026071@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175566 ------- Additional Comments From ch.nolte at fh-wolfenbuettel.de 2005-12-21 16:22 EST ------- While I am waiting for a sponsorship, I will definitely try to get this package working within the devel branch. However, as I am new to these procedures I first have to get warm with mock & co. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From jonathan.underwood at gmail.com Wed Dec 21 21:32:49 2005 From: jonathan.underwood at gmail.com (Jonathan Underwood) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:32:49 +0000 Subject: Becoming a contributor and FC(release-1) and FC(release+1) branches In-Reply-To: <1135194476.1969.4.camel@ignacio.lan> References: <645d17210512211136n4d475b8cu@mail.gmail.com> <1135194476.1969.4.camel@ignacio.lan> Message-ID: <645d17210512211332q7e236fffs@mail.gmail.com> On 21/12/05, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > Previous versions are at the packager's discretion. devel should be > mandatory unless a) the app doesn't run on Rawhide and never will, or b) > the package is in Rawhide. I can't quite decide if that's a statement of fact, or a statement of your opinion? Assuming it's a statement of fact, is it acceptable to contribute devel packages built with mock in the absence of a rawhide install to test on? I realize there's a world of difference... Cheers, Jonathan From pertusus at free.fr Wed Dec 21 21:42:50 2005 From: pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:42:50 +0100 Subject: Becoming a contributor and FC(release-1) and FC(release+1) branches In-Reply-To: <645d17210512211332q7e236fffs@mail.gmail.com> References: <645d17210512211136n4d475b8cu@mail.gmail.com> <1135194476.1969.4.camel@ignacio.lan> <645d17210512211332q7e236fffs@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20051221214250.GA4277@free.fr> > Assuming it's a statement of fact, is it acceptable to contribute > devel packages built with mock in the absence of a rawhide install to > test on? I realize there's a world of difference... I think it is acceptable. At least that's what I do. -- Pat From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 21:47:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:47:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176374] New: Review Request: nagios-plugins Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: imlinux at gmail.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Url: http://preview.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins.spec SRPM Url: http://preview.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins-1.4.2-2.src.rpm Description: Nagios is a program that will monitor hosts and services on your network, and to email or page you when a problem arises or is resolved. Nagios runs on a unix server as a background or daemon process, intermittently running checks on various services that you specify. The actual service checks are performed by separate "plugin" programs which return the status of the checks to Nagios. This package contains those plugins. Misc: I'm currently working on getting Nagios into extras. These are the plugins for Nagios. There's a few warnings during configure time, I'm not sure what the policy is on this, any help would be appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From jspaleta at gmail.com Wed Dec 21 21:59:06 2005 From: jspaleta at gmail.com (Jeff Spaleta) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:59:06 -0500 Subject: Becoming a contributor and FC(release-1) and FC(release+1) branches In-Reply-To: <645d17210512211332q7e236fffs@mail.gmail.com> References: <645d17210512211136n4d475b8cu@mail.gmail.com> <1135194476.1969.4.camel@ignacio.lan> <645d17210512211332q7e236fffs@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <604aa7910512211359h4c3b6ba3n8d5361ac42a3146c@mail.gmail.com> On 12/21/05, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > On 21/12/05, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > Previous versions are at the packager's discretion. devel should be > > mandatory unless a) the app doesn't run on Rawhide and never will, or b) > > the package is in Rawhide. > > I can't quite decide if that's a statement of fact, or a statement of > your opinion? I'll state it as fact. A devel branch should absolutely exist in Core or Extras for a package that will be useful in the next fedora release. If it doesn't work in devel but it works in the current fedora release, that's something for you and the reviewer to hash out. Considering the rate of change in the devel tree i don't think anyone can reasonable expect that problems in the devel branch should always block a build into the fc4(or whatever the current release is) Depending on the situation, if a package doesn't work in rawhide, but the reviewer can review it successfully for fc4.. then it should be allowed to be imported into devel and fc4 branches and built for fc4.. and the packager can continue to work on the devel branch problems in the fedora cvs system. This arrangement of course should be discouraged right before a core release, for upgrade path considerations. The nature of the development tree is such that problems will continue to develop over time and have to be address as the underlying dependancies in Core change. Crap in the development tree is prone to breakage over time regardless of whats happening during the review. > Assuming it's a statement of fact, is it acceptable to contribute > devel packages built with mock in the absence of a rawhide install to > test on? I realize there's a world of difference... I am not aware of a requirement that contributors run rawhide. It should be enough to reach out on the lists for rawhide users to do the functionality testing if its required. Just like contributors are not expected to have access to all arches either. What you should do is be clear as to which branch you have tested on locally when you request the package inclusion so the reviewer can be aware. Noone has access to enough hardware to check all functionality, all you can really do is work out the buildbugs so it can get into the tree and testers and beat their heads against it. -jef From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 22:21:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:21:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176109] Review Request: pytraffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512212221.jBLMLChY004096@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pytraffic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176109 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-21 17:21 EST ------- Use the python-abi in Requires like the template from the fedora-rpmdevtools package. fedora-qa script found: * Scriptlets: missing "gtk-update-icon-cache" in %postun (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) (in subpackage pytraffic) * Source 0 is not available (http://alpha.uhasselt.be/Research/Algebra/Members/pytraffic/pytraffic-2.5.4.tar.gz) (wiki: QAChecklist item 2) * Scriptlets: missing "gtk-update-icon-cache" in %postun (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) (in subpackage pytraffic) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 22:40:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:40:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176205] Review Request: GZLauncher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512212240.jBLMeRoH007238@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GZLauncher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176205 ------- Additional Comments From nickmarko at gmail.com 2005-12-21 17:40 EST ------- New spec file and rpm: http://www.filelodge.com/files/hdd4/84253/gzlauncher-1.06.4-2.src.rpm http://www.filelodge.com/files/hdd4/84253/gzlauncher.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From Christian.Iseli at licr.org Wed Dec 21 22:48:22 2005 From: Christian.Iseli at licr.org (Christian.Iseli at licr.org) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:48:22 +0100 Subject: Scribus in rawhide In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:21:00 GMT." <1135200060.3232.5.camel@T7.Linux> Message-ID: <200512212344.jBLNikLp026160@mx2.redhat.com> paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk said: > I've got the okay from the current maintainer to take over the packaging of > Scribus. > What do I need to do next? - edit owners.list - reassign bz tickets - cvs co scribus - hack away - make build - ask more questions if you get stuck somewhere - have fun in the process Or something along those lines... :-) Cheers, Christian From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 22:50:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:50:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176205] Review Request: GZLauncher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512212250.jBLMoTal009059@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GZLauncher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176205 ------- Additional Comments From nickmarko at gmail.com 2005-12-21 17:50 EST ------- Sorry, forgot to drop those auto tools. New spec file and rpm: http://www.filelodge.com/files/hdd4/84253/gzlauncher.spec http://www.filelodge.com/files/hdd4/84253/gzlauncher-1.06.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 23:26:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:26:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176205] Review Request: GZLauncher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512212326.jBLNQ9J7013819@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GZLauncher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176205 ------- Additional Comments From nickmarko at gmail.com 2005-12-21 18:25 EST ------- Sorry, forgot to add a changelog entry. New srpm (spec file included in comment #3): http://www.filelodge.com/files/hdd4/84253/gzlauncher-1.06.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 21 23:56:19 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:56:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512212356.jBLNuJ7f019144@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla at niemueller.de 2005-12-21 18:56 EST ------- Is there someone willing to sponsor this to get it into Extras finally? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 02:56:17 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 21:56:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512220256.jBM2uHqc012714@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 paul at xtdnet.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at xtdnet.nl ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2005-12-21 21:56 EST ------- I have a few questions and comments (though I don't have the power to aprove or reject your package): - Why do you use /var/lib/nagios? Since these are all standard scripts and not machine specific data, i would put them in /usr. They can be shared by many machines after all, and that is what /usr I think still intends to be. - Would it make sense to give nagios a homedir? Most people will want to call those scripts using a central nagios-server running plugins through check_via_ssh. I prefer not to have the scripts *writable* by the nagios user, so a seperate directory in /usr/lib/nagios, with files owned by root, and a seperate nagios homnedirectory for its .ssh dirctory with authorized_keys. - I know there is also a nagios-extras plugin set. Would it make sense to split out all these nagios checks in seperate packages? The advantage would be that proper Requires: can be used. The disadvantage is the enormous overhead of packaging and installing. Should we add the nagios-extras? - I correctly did not cause dependancies on half the Core distro (debian did when i apt-get install'ed nagios-plugins, installing things like mysql). - What is the purpose of /etc/nagios/ and command.cfg ? - Should Fedora reserve a UID/GID < 500 for nagios, so we can do additional security like not allowing password logins or change of passwords, etc - Add a Requires: net-snmp-perl? (see below) - Are you planning to package oreon as well? - sourceforge urls are usually written as http://sourceforge.net/projects/%{name}/ - Use Release: 2%{?dist} - don't use %define nagiosname, just decide (and use nagios) - I was told to stick to make, not %{__make}. Same for rm and install. - I would either use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or (imho preferably) %{buildroot}, but not both. - how useful are check_ifoperstatus and check_ifstatus? Perhaps make the rm a conditional on using/defining "with-net-smtp"? (and make requires: for that ifdef'ed as well) - I dont think the individual files/groups in %{_localstatedir}/%{_lib}/%{nagiosname}/libexec/ need to be seperately added if you add the directory already? (someone else verify this?) - add the nagios user/group upon install? What I used (from my nsd rpm): %pre if getent passwd nagios >/dev/null 2>&1 ; then : ; else /usr/sbin/useradd -d /home/nagios -r -s /bin/bash nagios >/dev/null 2>&1 || exit 1 ; fi (note that AFAIK, it requires a valid login shell for check_ssh to work. If you get an assigned UID/GID you can specify it in this commmand. The home directory should probably go somewhere more reasonable. I tend to think nagios files should be in /usr/lib/nagios and its homedir in /var/lib/nagios, but perhaps there is a clearer Fedora policy on this that I am not aware of). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 03:51:04 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:51:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174181] Review Request: python-simpy Python simulation framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512220351.jBM3p4Sv022886@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-simpy Python simulation framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174181 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-21 22:50 EST ------- Looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From mpeters at mac.com Thu Dec 22 04:04:32 2005 From: mpeters at mac.com (Michael A. Peters) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:04:32 -0800 Subject: Devel branch rebuilds Message-ID: <1135224273.3547.6.camel@locolhost.localdomain> According to a thread on the devel list - it pretty much is up to the packager to rebuild on their own. I know from personal experience this is necessary for stuff built against libstdc++ even if the shared library hasn't changed - one of my packages hadn't been rebuilt for awhile, I compiled something with gcc-c ++-4.1.0 and it segfaulted, but early stuff I compiled against it worked. I rebuilt the package with no changes - then the segfaulting switched (new software worked just find, old software linked against it segfaulted) until I rebuilt the older stuff again. I'm sure most of you are aware of this, but I just wanted to remind those that are able to to test their stuff to see if it needs a rebuild when core devel freezes in prep for Test2. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 04:31:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:31:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512220431.jBM4Vcos030105@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2005-12-21 23:31 EST ------- Actually packaging each plugin individually is an interesting idea. It might encourage others to get their own plugins into Fedora Extras (and there is a pretty active community of plugin writers at present). I chose /var/lib/nagios for the scripts because some of them are arch specific (check_mysql: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5) As far as the Nagios user goes, I'm curious as to what others think best practice is for this. For plugins I thought it best to leave it up to the administrator to choose who to run the plugin as. But it may be best practice to give them a Nagios user by default and let them change it if they see fit. If we do add a Nagios user, he will need a shell for check_by_ssh. sorry about the RPM_BUILD_ROOT (I always forget to change it from the Fedora template... I'll fix it for release 3) I also found out today that Net::SNMP and perl-net-snmp are not the same thing: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2005-December/msg03100.html On second look I think command.cfg is legacy and can (and will) be safely removed. Oreon is certainly a possibility but I'm just trying to make sure I can get Nagios and its plugins in first. Thanks for the feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 05:46:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 00:46:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176096] Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512220546.jBM5kE9e006617@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176096 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-22 00:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > > But that will fail to register the gentium directory in > %{_datadir}/fonts/fonts.cache-1, won't it? It doesn't seem to be an issue anymore, but it doesn't specifically need to be registered in %{_datadir}/fonts/fonts.cache-{1,2} in order for the fonts to work. However - I just tested your package, and fc-cache on devel does in fact create the proper file in devel branch now when used on a parent directory - so the spec file is fine. > > > 3) I personally would get rid of > > > > %define fontdir %{_datadir}/fonts/gentium > > > > Just use %{_datadir}/fonts/gentium > > I prefer to stay with it, to minimize possible mistakes when in a later version > one mistakenly writes "genitum". That's fine. I guess it's a matter of taste. -=- This package is listed as assigned and in FE-Review. But it's assigned to default gdk Is that a mistake? -=- We should request a bug with rpmlint to get the license added to rpmlint since I would like to see othe SIL fonts with that license (when released) added to extras as well. I'll do that later tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 10:57:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 05:57:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221057.jBMAvGtr016820@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-22 05:56 EST ------- The | ERROR 0001: file '/sbin/initng' contains a standard rpath '/lib64' in [/lib64] errors on x86_64 are caused by an old autoconf version (it seems, an ancient 1.4 was used). Regenerating buildscripts with 'autoreconf -i -f' removes the rpath errors. But it should be fixed upstream, not in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From pertusus at free.fr Thu Dec 22 11:12:59 2005 From: pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:12:59 +0100 Subject: f771 bus error in devel x86_64 In-Reply-To: <20051221103223.GA2721@free.fr> References: <20051221103223.GA2721@free.fr> Message-ID: <20051222111259.GC2708@free.fr> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:32:23AM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Hello, > > On x86_64 (and always on hammer2.fedora.redhat.com, if it turns out to > be hardware related) I get a reproducible failure when trying a rebuild > of the cernlib. As a side note, subsequent builds on i386 (on hammer1) and ppc succeeded. > I tried 3 builds and the 3 builds stopped with an error, for 3 different > files. The error is: > g77: Internal error: Bus error (program f771) > Please submit a full bug report. > > The 3 files are very simple subroutines, so I believe there is an issue > somewhere else. > > The error happened after 8, 9 and 11 minutes. > > The builds are build 2079, 2080 and 2081. -- Pat From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 13:39:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:39:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221339.jBMDdElR007245@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2005-12-22 08:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #122) > errors on x86_64 are caused by an old autoconf version (it seems, an ancient 1.4 > was used). Are you really sure about this? Autoconf 1.4 has gotta be more than five years old. Or do you mean automake? (I'll notice this bug to the team, just gotta have the details clear first) So, is there any other news on this review? Is anything going to happen this year? What do we wait for? Gauret? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 14:23:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:23:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176096] Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221423.jBMENFPc014078@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176096 roozbeh at farsiweb.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2005-12-22 09:23 EST ------- Since I've already got an sponsor, it seems that a normal review should work. John, would you ACCEPT? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 14:25:05 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:25:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221425.jBMEP5oa014331@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-22 09:24 EST ------- aclocal.m4 (which brings in the rpath bits) starts with | dnl aclocal.m4 generated automatically by aclocal 1.4-p6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 14:38:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:38:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221438.jBMEcfwX016368@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2005-12-22 09:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #124) > aclocal.m4 (which brings in the rpath bits) starts with > | dnl aclocal.m4 generated automatically by aclocal 1.4-p6 So we're talking automake. I've filed a initng bug, http://bugzilla.initng.thinktux.net/show_bug.cgi?id=360 about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 14:40:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:40:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176096] Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221440.jBMEe8mL016591@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176096 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2005-12-22 09:39 EST ------- I believe the first package must be reviewed by the person that sponsors you. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors (Step 7). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 14:43:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:43:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221443.jBMEhwlx017280@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-22 09:43 EST ------- oops, you are right Another issue which makes current package nearly unusable on Fedora: you should call '/sbin/udevstart' but not '/sbin/start_udev' in system/initial.i. Latter program will kill the previously started 'udevd' which stops most services to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 14:45:17 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:45:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176096] Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221445.jBMEjHET017504@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176096 ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2005-12-22 09:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > I believe the first package must be reviewed by the person that sponsors you. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors > (Step 7). I've seen the page, but neither Daniel nor Seth Vidal thought that would be necessary anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 14:46:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:46:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221446.jBMEkdLh017662@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-22 09:46 EST ------- And yet another issue: initng segfaults on x86_64 when a service fails to start. Unfortunately, I do not have arbitrary access to the x86_64 box and can not track it down (nor can I provide further details). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 14:52:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:52:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176096] Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221452.jBMEqbQh018476@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176096 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-22 09:52 EST ------- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 15:07:48 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:07:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176205] Review Request: GZLauncher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221507.jBMF7m09021167@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GZLauncher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176205 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-22 10:07 EST ------- We need to find you a sponsor. It builds and installs OK, but when I skip the account part and use Launcher > Preferences in the menus it segfaults. Doesn't own all directories it creates, particularly %{_datadir}/gzlauncher/. Instead of including the pixmaps seperately just put ${_datadir}/gzlauncher/ in %files and own the whole thing. You don't need to wipe the changelog clean after every new release, it's common to put new entries on top of the changlog and keep the old ones. But that's not critical. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 15:09:01 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:09:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221509.jBMF91sc021387@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2005-12-22 10:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #126) > oops, you are right I know ;-) > Another issue which makes current package nearly unusable on Fedora: > you should call '/sbin/udevstart' but not '/sbin/start_udev' in system/initial.i. > Latter program will kill the previously started 'udevd' which stops most > services to work. Oh, you're right! I haven't noticed this since apparently udev can't be stopped while filldev is running, so initng simply ignores udevd dying. I guess this means that all the stuff start_udev does is now built into initng's own scripts? If I understand things correctly start_udev is Fedora specific, so I guess I can simply remove it from initial.ii and this problem will be solved... >initng segfaults on x86_64 when a service fails to start. I wish I would have a 64 bit machine to try this out. I hope anybody can trace it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 15:17:10 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:17:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170131] Review Request: php-extras - Additional PHP modules from the standard PHP distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221517.jBMFHAZQ022430@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-extras - Additional PHP modules from the standard PHP distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170131 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gauret at free.fr ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-22 10:16 EST ------- Needs work: * Source php-5.0.4.tar.gz is different from upstream * Specfile should be in the format %{name}.spec (wiki: PackageReviewGuidelines) * Build failed in mock with this error "No Spec file found in srpm: php-extras-5.0.4-2.src.rpm" (because of previous issue) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 15:31:44 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:31:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167714] Review Request: pam_usb: PAM module for use with DSA key pairs and removable devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221531.jBMFViwG024850@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_usb: PAM module for use with DSA key pairs and removable devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167714 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-22 10:31 EST ------- * add /etc/udev/rules.d file instead of /etc/hotplug.d * add your pam.d examples in %doc New SPEC: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/pam_usb/pam_usb.spec New SRPM: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/pam_usb/pam_usb-0.3.3-2.src.rpm > and still haven't gotten /etc/pam.d/xscreensaver to work right. Perhaps it could chagnge after switch to udev ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 15:55:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:55:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170131] Review Request: php-extras - Additional PHP modules from the standard PHP distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221555.jBMFtOuF029817@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-extras - Additional PHP modules from the standard PHP distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170131 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-22 10:55 EST ------- > Source php-5.0.4.tar.gz is different from upstream OOOPS! I just take it from FC4's php... Both initial and updated php-5.0.4 in FC4 have the same tarball, which differs from the upstream's tarball. (Perhaps FC4 uses some two-days-prerelease...). > Specfile should be in the format %{name}.spec Sorry, just a typo. New SPECS/SRPMS: FC3: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/php-extras/php-extras.spec.fc3 http://dmitry.butskoy.name/php-extras/php-extras-4.3.11-2.src.rpm FC4: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/php-extras/php-extras.spec.fc4 http://dmitry.butskoy.name/php-extras/php-extras-5.0.4-3.src.rpm FC5: http://dmitry.butskoy.name/php-extras/php-extras.spec.fc5 http://dmitry.butskoy.name/php-extras/php-extras-5.1.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 16:03:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:03:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221603.jBMG3ExC031505@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2005-12-22 11:02 EST ------- i can help with x86_64... i am running x96_64 rawhide. according to upstream the x86_64 segfaults are fixed in svn. not in 0.4.8 yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 22 16:19:13 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:19:13 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051222161913.E19C97FE6@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 3 cernlib-2005-11.fc3.4 l2tpd-0.69-0.2.20051030.fc3 nethack-vultures-1.11.1-2.fc3 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 22 16:30:54 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:30:54 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051222163054.6D2DF7FE6@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 6 Coin2-2.4.4-3.1.fc4 cernlib-2005-11.fc4.4 hdf5-1.6.5-1.fc4 hdf5-1.6.5-2.fc4 nethack-vultures-1.11.1-2.fc4 perl-HTML-Template-Expr-0.05-1.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 22 16:46:42 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:46:42 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051222164642.3C8EF7FFA@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 23 Coin2-2.4.4-6.fc5 Inventor-2.1.5-17.fc5 cernlib-2005-11.fc5.4 gentium-fonts-1.02-2 gpgme03-0.3.16-9.fc5 hdf5-1.6.5-1.fc5 hdf5-1.6.5-2.fc5 intuitively-0.7-7.fc5 krecipes-0.9.1-3.fc5 ktrack-0.3.0-12.rc1..fc5 libsx-2.05-7.fc5 net6-1.2.2-1.fc5 nethack-vultures-1.11.1-2.fc5 obby-0.3.0-1.fc5 pam_ssh-1.91-13.fc5 perl-GDGraph-1.4305-1.fc5 perl-HTML-Template-Expr-0.05-1.fc5 python-bibtex-1.2.2-2.fc5 recode-3.6-20.fc5 scribus-1.2.1-6 sobby-0.3.0-1.fc5 tetex-tex4ht-1.0.2005_12_21_0412-1.fc5 wesnoth-1.0.2-1.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From gmane at niemueller.de Thu Dec 22 17:29:07 2005 From: gmane at niemueller.de (Tim Niemueller) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 18:29:07 +0100 Subject: oRTP package fix Message-ID: Hi there. I would bugzilla this but there is no product record for ortp yet... For version 0.7.1 the file %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ortp.pc needs to be added to the devel files section. Tim -- Tim Niemueller www.niemueller.de ================================================================= Imagination is more important than knowledge. (Albert Einstein) From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 17:44:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:44:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221744.jBMHiOOn018177@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-22 12:44 EST ------- I can test it again (on x86_64)... should I use svn or 0.4.8 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 17:58:51 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:58:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171347] Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221758.jBMHwpZM022141@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: l2tpd - Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171347 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-22 12:58 EST ------- As all is built OK, perhaps you should "close/nextrelease" this bugzilla ticket... ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 18:48:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:48:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221848.jBMImqke031457@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-22 13:48 EST ------- ok tested it (svn) boots fine (still not correct services are added but did this manually ex: samba) sometimes hald does not run or gets stopped 9:45:53 system/firestarter : STARTING 19:45:53 daemon/named : STARTING 19:45:53 daemon/named : RUNNING 19:45:53 daemon/mysql : STARTING 19:45:53 daemon/mysql : RUNNING 19:45:53 daemon/samba/smbd : STARTING 19:45:53 daemon/samba/smbd : RUNNING 19:45:53 daemon/samba/nmbd : STARTING 19:45:53 daemon/samba/nmbd : RUNNING 19:45:53 daemon/httpd : STARTING 19:45:53 daemon/samba : DONE 19:45:55 daemon/mysql : *OUTPUT* Starting mysqld daemon with databases from /var/lib/mysql 19:45:58 daemon/hald : STOPPED 19:45:59 system/firestarter : *OUTPUT* without any reason (I tryed to add daemon/hald to gdm but it did'nt help) this causes that mountpoints are displayed on the desktop instead of in computer:// shutdown: still broken it freezes at %5 (hald) or %11 (modules) seems to be a random freeze at the end. currently I don't now what exactly happens (no segfault or similar error message just freeze) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 19:00:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:00:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176434] New: Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176434 Summary: Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: roozbeh at farsiweb.info QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/spicctrl.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/spicctrl-1.9-1.1.src.rpm Description: spicctrl queries and sets a variety of parameters on Sony Vaio laptop computers, including AC Power status, battery status, screen brightness, and bluetooth device power status. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 19:03:44 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:03:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221903.jBMJ3iXA002688@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-22 14:03 EST ------- I found an other bug: when I boot with initng and after reboot boot with sysvinit (normal boot) I get a message that It could not open /etc/fstab permission denied (relabel was needed) seems that initng changes some file labes during boot (or shutdown). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 19:06:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:06:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512221906.jBMJ6dkH003506@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-22 14:06 EST ------- here is the avc error: audit(1135277882.299:2): avc: denied { read } for pid=1610 comm="fsck" name="fstab" dev=sda5 ino=1705884 scontext=system_u:system_r:fsadm_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:unlabeled_t tclass=file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ivazquez at ivazquez.net Thu Dec 22 20:10:14 2005 From: ivazquez at ivazquez.net (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:10:14 -0500 Subject: oRTP package fix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1135282214.1969.5.camel@ignacio.lan> On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 18:29 +0100, Tim Niemueller wrote: > I would bugzilla this but there is no product record for ortp yet... Crap, how did I let that happen... > For version 0.7.1 the file > %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ortp.pc > needs to be added to the devel files section. Alright, I'll fix it, thanks. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From ivazquez at ivazquez.net Thu Dec 22 20:37:42 2005 From: ivazquez at ivazquez.net (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:37:42 -0500 Subject: oRTP package fix In-Reply-To: <1135282214.1969.5.camel@ignacio.lan> References: <1135282214.1969.5.camel@ignacio.lan> Message-ID: <1135283862.1969.7.camel@ignacio.lan> On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 15:10 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 18:29 +0100, Tim Niemueller wrote: > > I would bugzilla this but there is no product record for ortp yet... > > Crap, how did I let that happen... > > > For version 0.7.1 the file > > %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ortp.pc > > needs to be added to the devel files section. > > Alright, I'll fix it, thanks. NEXTRELEASE -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 22 22:40:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176452] New: Review Request: oddjob Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176452 Summary: Review Request: oddjob Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: nalin at redhat.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://people.redhat.com/nalin/oddjob/extras/oddjob.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://people.redhat.com/nalin/oddjob/extras/oddjob-0.21-1.src.rpm Description: A method for running privileged applications on behalf of unprivileged clients. Clients issue requests to oddjobd over the system message bus (D-BUS). In addition to access controls provided by D-BUS, the oddjobd server provides an ACL facility to control who can issue requests for helpers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From jspaleta at gmail.com Fri Dec 23 02:57:00 2005 From: jspaleta at gmail.com (Jeff Spaleta) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 21:57:00 -0500 Subject: Devel branch rebuilds In-Reply-To: <1135224273.3547.6.camel@locolhost.localdomain> References: <1135224273.3547.6.camel@locolhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <604aa7910512221857v3d0ef03rb838b30016db6a2e@mail.gmail.com> On 12/21/05, Michael A. Peters wrote: > I'm sure most of you are aware of this, but I just wanted to remind > those that are able to to test their stuff to see if it needs a rebuild > when core devel freezes in prep for Test2. there seems to be some real oddities in the rawhide build environment still. I keep doing local mock builds of things and i have to explcitly pull in libXau-devel for nearly every application as a BuildRequires... which seems a bit odd to me. -jef From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 04:05:07 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 23:05:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512230405.jBN457a7024795@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 kevin at tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |kevin at tummy.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2005-12-22 23:04 EST ------- Good: - sources match up with upstream. - builds on fc4/devel - license is good and included (BSD) - names good Nits: - why use the 'release_func'? and why a 1.2 release? integers are more standard and not having a release_func would make things more readable (IMHO). - minit and initng aren't in extras/core yet, might leave that out until they are added and then add support for those in? - Might fold the 'lsb' package into the main package? I would expect a package to have a init script in the main package. - Changelog might be included in docs? Needs work: - rpmlint output: these can be ignored: E: tor non-standard-gid /var/log/tor toranon E: tor non-standard-uid /var/lib/tor toranon Do these need to have these permissions? E: tor non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/tor 0730 E: tor non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/tor 0700 Can you add a logrotate file? W: tor log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/tor Perhaps fold this into the main package to avoid this: W: tor-lsb no-documentation Looks like init script isn't right according to rpmlint: W: tor-lsb conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/tor E: tor-lsb executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/tor E: tor-lsb postin-without-chkconfig /etc/rc.d/init.d/tor E: tor-lsb preun-without-chkconfig /etc/rc.d/init.d/tor W: tor-lsb incoherent-init-script-name tor - Doesn't build in mock: missing BuildRequires of 'ghostscript' ? make: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/tor-0.1.0.15/doc/design-paper' fig2dev -L pdf cell-struct.fig cell-struct.pdf sh: gs: command not found fig2dev: broken pipe (GhostScript aborted?) command was: gs -q -dNOPAUSE -sAutoRotatePages=None -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=cell-struct.pdf - -c quit make: *** [cell-struct.pdf] Error 1 make: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/tor-0.1.0.15/doc/design-paper' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.66579 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 04:23:17 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 23:23:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176205] Review Request: GZLauncher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512230423.jBN4NHsf027209@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GZLauncher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176205 ------- Additional Comments From nickmarko at gmail.com 2005-12-22 23:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) The reason for the program seg faulting is not becasue of the RPM package, it's because of the program itself. New spec file and rpm: http://www.filelodge.com/files/hdd4/84253/gzlauncher.spec http://www.filelodge.com/files/hdd4/84253/gzlauncher-1.06.4-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From dennis at ausil.us Fri Dec 23 05:12:29 2005 From: dennis at ausil.us (Dennis Gilmore) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 23:12:29 -0600 Subject: Devel branch rebuilds In-Reply-To: <604aa7910512221857v3d0ef03rb838b30016db6a2e@mail.gmail.com> References: <1135224273.3547.6.camel@locolhost.localdomain> <604aa7910512221857v3d0ef03rb838b30016db6a2e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200512222312.39089.dennis@ausil.us> Once upon a time Thursday 22 December 2005 8:57 pm, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 12/21/05, Michael A. Peters wrote: > > I'm sure most of you are aware of this, but I just wanted to remind > > those that are able to to test their stuff to see if it needs a rebuild > > when core devel freezes in prep for Test2. > > there seems to be some real oddities in the rawhide build environment > still. I keep doing local mock builds of things and i have to explcitly > pull in libXau-devel for nearly every application as a BuildRequires... > which seems a bit odd to me. > > -jef most configure scripts are broken and check for the existance of one header and one shared library to test if X is available. which is ok with monolithic X, as that is true. so the check needs to be updated now to check for each X module a program actually uses. Dennis -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 05:41:30 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:41:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176467] New: Review Request: alltray: Dock any application in the tray Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176467 Summary: Review Request: alltray: Dock any application in the tray Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: ivazquez at ivazquez.net QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/alltray.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/alltray-0.65-1.src.rpm Description: With AllTray you can dock any application without a native tray icon into the system tray. It works well with GNOME, KDE, XFCE 4, Fluxbox, and WindowMaker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 07:37:07 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 02:37:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176109] Review Request: pytraffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512230737.jBN7b6tc016315@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pytraffic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176109 ------- Additional Comments From michel.vandenbergh at uhasselt.be 2005-12-23 02:36 EST ------- Thanks for the comments! I addressed these in a new version. New spec file: http://alpha.uhasselt.be/Research/Algebra/Members/pytraffic/pytraffic.spec New SRPM: http://alpha.uhasselt.be/Research/Algebra/Members/pytraffic/pytraffic-2.5.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ville.skytta at iki.fi Fri Dec 23 08:03:42 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:03:42 +0200 Subject: Devel branch rebuilds In-Reply-To: <604aa7910512221857v3d0ef03rb838b30016db6a2e@mail.gmail.com> References: <1135224273.3547.6.camel@locolhost.localdomain> <604aa7910512221857v3d0ef03rb838b30016db6a2e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1135325022.28108.10.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 21:57 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > there seems to be some real oddities in the rawhide build environment still. > I keep doing local mock builds of things and i have to explcitly pull > in libXau-devel for nearly every application as a BuildRequires... > which seems a bit odd to me. That's possibly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/176313 From pertusus at free.fr Fri Dec 23 08:46:13 2005 From: pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:46:13 +0100 Subject: Devel branch rebuilds In-Reply-To: <604aa7910512221857v3d0ef03rb838b30016db6a2e@mail.gmail.com> References: <1135224273.3547.6.camel@locolhost.localdomain> <604aa7910512221857v3d0ef03rb838b30016db6a2e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20051223084612.GA2856@free.fr> > there seems to be some real oddities in the rawhide build environment still. > I keep doing local mock builds of things and i have to explcitly pull > in libXau-devel for nearly every application as a BuildRequires... > which seems a bit odd to me. It may also be: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173530 -- Pat From rdieter at math.unl.edu Fri Dec 23 09:19:08 2005 From: rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 03:19:08 -0600 Subject: Devel branch rebuilds In-Reply-To: <200512222312.39089.dennis@ausil.us> References: <1135224273.3547.6.camel@locolhost.localdomain> <604aa7910512221857v3d0ef03rb838b30016db6a2e@mail.gmail.com> <200512222312.39089.dennis@ausil.us> Message-ID: Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Once upon a time Thursday 22 December 2005 8:57 pm, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > >>On 12/21/05, Michael A. Peters wrote: >> >>>I'm sure most of you are aware of this, but I just wanted to remind >>>those that are able to to test their stuff to see if it needs a rebuild >>>when core devel freezes in prep for Test2. >> >>there seems to be some real oddities in the rawhide build environment >>still. I keep doing local mock builds of things and i have to explcitly >>pull in libXau-devel for nearly every application as a BuildRequires... >>which seems a bit odd to me. > most configure scripts are broken and check for the existance of one header > and one shared library to test if X is available. Similarly, KDE apps' configure includes generic tests for X that check for the existence of libXt. -- Rex From pertusus at free.fr Fri Dec 23 09:16:44 2005 From: pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:16:44 +0100 Subject: seeing config.log for a failed build Message-ID: <20051223091644.GC2856@free.fr> Hello, I have some builds (grads) that fails with a ./configure error. Is there a mean to have a look at the config.log file (not a big deal otherwise, I'll just ExcludeArch)? (it is on x86_64 arch which I cannot test myself). -- Pat From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 09:47:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 04:47:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172343] Review Request: libtomoe-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512230947.jBN9l2Fw002059@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtomoe-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172343 ------- Additional Comments From ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net 2005-12-23 04:46 EST ------- Thank you for noticing me. I've fixed it. Now it must be okay. SRPM: http://proxy.f2.ymdb.yahoofs.jp/users/d1e4801f/bc/libtomoe-gtk/libtomoe-gtk-0.1.0-2.src.rpm?bcVMnIEB1KcJKSZg Spec: http://proxy.f2.ymdb.yahoofs.jp/users/d1e4801f/bc/libtomoe-gtk/libtomoe-gtk.spec?bcVMnIEBiSlAwHz9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 09:51:54 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 04:51:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170131] Review Request: php-extras - Additional PHP modules from the standard PHP distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512230951.jBN9psN9002907@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-extras - Additional PHP modules from the standard PHP distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170131 gauret at free.fr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |gauret at free.fr OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-23 04:51 EST ------- * rpmlint complains: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/php/modules/mcrypt.so ['/usr/lib'] binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/php/modules/mhash.so ['/usr/lib'] binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/php/modules/readline.so ['/usr/lib'] binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/php/modules/tidy.so ['/usr/lib'] * The packages should contain the text of the license (wiki: PackageReviewGuidelines) Concerning the different sources, I've gunzipped the one shipped by fedora an upstreams, and both tarballs give the same md5sum, so I guess Fedora's one has just been re-tarred. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Fri Dec 23 09:59:07 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:59:07 +0100 Subject: seeing config.log for a failed build In-Reply-To: <20051223091644.GC2856@free.fr> References: <20051223091644.GC2856@free.fr> Message-ID: <1135331948.12394.323.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 10:16 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Hello, > > I have some builds (grads) that fails with a ./configure error. Is there a > mean to have a look at the config.log file (not a big deal otherwise, I'll > just ExcludeArch)? I can't answer this question, but I see something else: + ./bootstrap acinclude.m4:358: warning: underquoted definition of GA_SET_FLAGS run info '(automake)Extending aclocal' or see http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending-aclocal You are running the autotools as part of building. I'd recall how many times I tried to advise packagers not to do so. You are very likely becoming victim of a configuration's incompatibilities to modern autotools and to bugs in a configuration being raised by running modern autotools on packages relying upon outdated autotools. The log message above is a strong indication this might happen be happening to you in this particular case - However, without having analyzed the details, this is a wild guess. Ralf From pertusus at free.fr Fri Dec 23 10:13:31 2005 From: pertusus at free.fr (Patrice Dumas) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:13:31 +0100 Subject: seeing config.log for a failed build In-Reply-To: <1135331948.12394.323.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> References: <20051223091644.GC2856@free.fr> <1135331948.12394.323.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> Message-ID: <20051223101331.GF2856@free.fr> > You are running the autotools as part of building. I'd recall how many > times I tried to advise packagers not to do so. I fully agree with you. However in that case I believe this is unfortunately necessary. Indeed the upstream checks for a several years old opendap library and the changes are so big that it isn't possible to patch the configure script. > You are very likely becoming victim of a configuration's > incompatibilities to modern autotools and to bugs in a configuration > being raised by running modern autotools on packages relying upon > outdated autotools. That's a possibility, indeed. But there are other possibilities... -- Pat From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 10:26:21 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 05:26:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512231026.jBNAQLkm007253@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-23 05:26 EST ------- * Fri Dec 23 2005 Enrico Scholz - 0.1.0.15-1.8 - added ChangeLog to %doc - made torrc not world-readable - added logrotate script * Thu Dec 22 2005 Enrico Scholz - 0.1.0.15-1.4 - updated initng scripts to initng-0.4.8 syntax - tweaked some Requires(...): - added ghostscript BuildRequires: - install initng scripts into the correct dir http://ensc.de/fedora/tor.spec http://ensc.de/fedora/tor-0.1.0.15-1.8.src.rpm ===================== > - why use the 'release_func'? there is no big difference between the '%{?dist}' annotation and my %release_func. But the %release_func gives some more control over the resulting Release: and all of my packages are using it. > and why a 1.2 release? Will become '2' at first CVS checkin. I just want to avoid release-inflation during the review. > - minit and initng aren't in extras/core yet, might leave that out > until they are added and then add support for those in? Both initstyles are disabled by default. But they are both used on my systems and 'initng' is under review (bug #173459) so it may appear soon at least in Extras. > - Might fold the 'lsb' package into the main package? I would like to avoid it. It brings lot of huge dependencies which are useless when you want to use 'tor' with 'initng' or 'minit'. > - Changelog might be included in docs? done > Do these need to have these permissions? > E: tor non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/tor 0730 > E: tor non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/tor 0700 can be ignored IMO. > Can you add a logrotate file? > W: tor log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/tor done > Looks like init script isn't right according to rpmlint: > W: tor-lsb conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/tor > E: tor-lsb executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/tor initscripts ARE %config but not %config(noreplace) usually > E: tor-lsb postin-without-chkconfig /etc/rc.d/init.d/tor > E: tor-lsb preun-without-chkconfig /etc/rc.d/init.d/tor > W: tor-lsb incoherent-init-script-name tor looks like bugs in rpmlint; the lsb initscript will be (un)registered properly and it is named 'tor'. > - Doesn't build in mock: missing BuildRequires of 'ghostscript' ? fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 10:31:05 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 05:31:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512231031.jBNAV5AC007854@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-23 05:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > * Fri Dec 23 2005 Enrico Scholz - > > Looks like init script isn't right according to rpmlint: > > W: tor-lsb conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/tor > > E: tor-lsb executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/tor > > initscripts ARE %config but not %config(noreplace) usually Really? I thought usually they weren't %config and shouldn't be edited, any config changes being managed using entries in /etc/sysconfig/somefile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From dan at danny.cz Fri Dec 23 11:33:46 2005 From: dan at danny.cz (Dan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hor=E1k?=) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 12:33:46 +0100 Subject: Devel branch rebuilds In-Reply-To: <604aa7910512221857v3d0ef03rb838b30016db6a2e@mail.gmail.com> References: <1135224273.3547.6.camel@locolhost.localdomain> <604aa7910512221857v3d0ef03rb838b30016db6a2e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1135337626.3180.5.camel@eagle.danny.cz> Jeff Spaleta p??e v ?t 22. 12. 2005 v 21:57 -0500: > On 12/21/05, Michael A. Peters wrote: > > I'm sure most of you are aware of this, but I just wanted to remind > > those that are able to to test their stuff to see if it needs a rebuild > > when core devel freezes in prep for Test2. > > there seems to be some real oddities in the rawhide build environment still. > I keep doing local mock builds of things and i have to explcitly pull > in libXau-devel for nearly every application as a BuildRequires... > which seems a bit odd to me. I have similar situation when building tinyerp for rawhide. It needs Xvfb server for building and I was not even able to specify xorg packages that are required to succesfully run Xvfb. In FC4 and FC3, it is sufficient to have xorg-x11-Xvfb as BuildRequires. Dan From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 11:47:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 06:47:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512231147.jBNBlQWt020624@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-23 06:47 EST ------- > > initscripts ARE %config but not %config(noreplace) usually > > Really? I thought usually they weren't %config and shouldn't be edited, > any config changes being managed using entries in /etc/sysconfig/somefile I could not find an explicit rule, but afais, most initscripts in Core are plain %config. This seems reasonable because: * you can make changes which remain across package updates (when the initscript did not changed between the versions) * changes will be backuped in .rpmsave files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 12:13:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 07:13:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175566] Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512231213.jBNCDk4U023644@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175566 ------- Additional Comments From ch.nolte at fh-wolfenbuettel.de 2005-12-23 07:13 EST ------- I have set up a test-box where I have installed the latest FC5-devel distribution according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Drafts/TestingGuide. I have also tested the kbibtex package on FC5-devel, updated today, without having any of the mentioned problems. The only thing I've encountered was a compile-error related to GCC 4.1.0 which I have fixed in the RPM. Perhaps you can verify this with the latest devel-versions. http://public.fh-wolfenbuettel.de/~noltec/open-source/kbibtex/kbibtex.spec http://public.fh-wolfenbuettel.de/~noltec/open-source/kbibtex/kbibtex-0.1.3-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ville.skytta at iki.fi Fri Dec 23 12:26:15 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:26:15 +0200 Subject: rpms/help2man/devel .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 help2man.spec, 1.8, 1.9 sources, 1.3, 1.4 In-Reply-To: <200512230923.jBN9N3UX015431@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> References: <200512230923.jBN9N3UX015431@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Message-ID: <1135340775.2525.4.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 04:22 -0500, Ralf Cors?pius wrote: > Log Message: > * Fri Dec 23 2005 Ralf Cors?pius - 1.36.3-1 > - Upstream update. > - Add build option --with nls. I wonder what's the problem with just enabling all NLS stuff by default (unconditionally, or making it possible to disable it using --without nls)? Sure, it would add a dependency on Locale::gettext and make the package arch specific, but would there be any real world problems in doing so? From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 12:37:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 07:37:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170131] Review Request: php-extras - Additional PHP modules from the standard PHP distribution In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512231237.jBNCbOsb025732@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-extras - Additional PHP modules from the standard PHP distribution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170131 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-23 07:37 EST ------- Well, The main goal of this package is to add some standard PHP-tarball's modules which are not compiled by default in FC. The added modules should look as if they were compiled in the main PHP package (i.e. as if the FC php's maintainers have decided to enable it as yet another main php's subpackage). Therefore these extras packages should first follow the FC's php behaviour (considering it as a precedent), and only then the recommended FE rules (if it is not conflicts with the main php behavior). > The packages should contain the text of the license IMHO it is included in the main php. Php's subpackages (php-ldap, php-pgsql etc.) do not include it. > binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/php/modules/.... ['/usr/lib'] Strange... My rpmlint-0.71-1 say nothing about it. And there is no any "/usr/lib" substrings in the binary files... What version of rpmlint did you use? When you build the main php package the same way as php-extras, are there similar reports about the main subpackages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rc040203 at freenet.de Fri Dec 23 12:41:19 2005 From: rc040203 at freenet.de (Ralf Corsepius) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:41:19 +0100 Subject: rpms/help2man/devel .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 help2man.spec, 1.8, 1.9 sources, 1.3, 1.4 In-Reply-To: <1135340775.2525.4.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> References: <200512230923.jBN9N3UX015431@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <1135340775.2525.4.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> Message-ID: <1135341680.12394.340.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 14:26 +0200, Ville Skytt? wrote: > On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 04:22 -0500, Ralf Cors?pius wrote: > > > Log Message: > > * Fri Dec 23 2005 Ralf Cors?pius - 1.36.3-1 > > - Upstream update. > > - Add build option --with nls. > > I wonder what's the problem with just enabling all NLS stuff by default > (unconditionally, or making it possible to disable it using --without > nls)? Sure, it would add a dependency on Locale::gettext and make the > package arch specific, but would there be any real world problems in > doing so? Have a look into the tarball and into hacklocaledir.c rsp. hacklocaledir.so and how it is working (cf help2man.info). I am very reluctant in wanting to activate this kind of stuff. Ralf From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 14:02:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:02:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173181] Review Request: buoh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512231402.jBNE2qWr003239@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buoh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173181 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2005-12-23 09:02 EST ------- Thanks for the comments. Yep this will be devel/fc5 only, the gtk 2.7 is a hard requirement by the upstream package, so no easy way around it. Release 3: * Fri Dec 23 2005 - Chris Chabot - 0.8-3 - Moved "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" from prep to install - Removed "unset GCONF_DISABLE_MAKEFILE_SCHEMA_INSTALL" since this shouldn't be required (it has its own shell env) URLS: Spec: http://www.xs4all.nl/~chabotc/buoh.spec SRPM: http://www.xs4all.nl/~chabotc/buoh-0.8-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 16:56:43 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:56:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176288] Review Request: kdemulimedia-extras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512231656.jBNGuhq0019034@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdemulimedia-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176288 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-23 11:56 EST ------- %changelog * Wed Dec 21 2005 Rex Dieter 6:3.5.0-4 - disable debugging/filelist-conflicts-check crud (for now) Spec Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/kdemultimedia-extras.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/kdemultimedia-extras-3.5.0-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Fri Dec 23 17:55:25 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 12:55:25 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051223175525.8AA487FFA@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 5 grads-1.9b4-5.fc3.3 ktrack-0.3.0-12.rc1..fc3 phpldapadmin-0.9.7.2-2.fc3 scim-input-pad-0.1.1-1.fc3 wesnoth-1.0.2-1.fc3 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Fri Dec 23 18:00:39 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:00:39 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051223180039.AD2EB7FFA@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 26 apollon-1.0.1-3.fc5 crack-5.0a-2.fc5 dbh-1.0.24-2.fc5 dbh-1.0.24-3.fc5 gnome-theme-clearlooks-bigpack-0.6-1.fc5 help2man-1.35.1-2.fc5 help2man-1.36.3-1.fc5 hmmer-2.3.2-4.fc5 kompose-0.5.3-4.fc5 libosip2-2.2.2-1.fc5 mantis-1.0.0-0.1.rc4.fc5 netcdf-3.6.0-9.p1.fc5 nfswatch-4.99.5-2.fc5 ortp-0.7.1-2.fc5 perl-GDGraph3d-0.63-4.fc5 perl-GDTextUtil-0.86-6.fc5 perl-IO-Multiplex-1.08-4 perl-pmtools-1.00-3.fc5 php-adodb-4.68-1.fc5 plplot-5.5.3-10.fc5 python-dateutil-1.1-1.fc5 python-dialog-2.7-2.fc5 python-numarray-1.5.0-1.fc5 python-simpy-1.6.1-2 pytz-2005m-1.fc5 xemacs-sumo-20051208-1 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Fri Dec 23 18:19:54 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:19:54 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051223181954.ED9187FFA@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 15 apollon-1.0.1-3.fc4 bmp-0.9.7.1-1.fc4 dbh-1.0.24-3.fc4 gift-0.11.8.1-3.fc4 gift-openft-0.2.1.6-2.fc4 grads-1.9b4-5.fc4.2 ktrack-0.3.0-12.rc1..fc4 libosip2-2.2.2-1.fc4 mantis-0.19.4-1.fc4 perl-GD-2.30-1.fc4 perl-GDGraph-1.4305-1.fc4 php-adodb-4.68-1.fc4 phpldapadmin-0.9.7.2-2.fc4 scim-input-pad-0.1.1-1.fc4 wesnoth-1.0.2-1.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 18:51:30 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:51:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173181] Review Request: buoh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512231851.jBNIpUSF029508@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buoh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173181 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2005-12-23 13:51 EST ------- Updated to 0.8.1 * Fri Dec 23 2005 - Chris Chabot - 0.8.1-1 - Updated to upstream 0.8.1 - Upstream changed required gtk+ version to 2.6 (from 2.7) URLS: Spec: http://www.xs4all.nl/~chabotc/buoh.spec SRPM: http://www.xs4all.nl/~chabotc/buoh-0.8.1-1.src.rpm Builds, mocks and rpmlint's cleanly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 19:08:50 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:08:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512231908.jBNJ8o4E031098@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2005-12-23 14:08 EST ------- >there is no big difference between the '%{?dist}' annotation and my >%release_func. But the %release_func gives some more control over the >resulting Release: and all of my packages are using it. ok. No big deal there. ;) >> and why a 1.2 release? >Will become '2' at first CVS checkin. I just want to avoid >release-inflation during the review. ok. Reasonable. >> - minit and initng aren't in extras/core yet, might leave that out >> until they are added and then add support for those in? >Both initstyles are disabled by default. But they are both used on my >systems and 'initng' is under review (bug #173459) so it may appear >soon at least in Extras. Indeed, but they aren't currently in, so why add them now? You can re-add those spec file bits and rebuild when/if they are included. Until then they are just dead weight in the spec file. >> - Might fold the 'lsb' package into the main package? >I would like to avoid it. It brings lot of huge dependencies which are >useless when you want to use 'tor' with 'initng' or 'minit'. Yeah, but doesn't every other package in core and extras with an init.d script already do that? I can't think of any other packages that have an init.d script that package it seperately. Or am I just missing some dependency there? >> E: tor-lsb postin-without-chkconfig /etc/rc.d/init.d/tor >> E: tor-lsb preun-without-chkconfig /etc/rc.d/init.d/tor >> W: tor-lsb incoherent-init-script-name tor >looks like bugs in rpmlint; the lsb initscript will be (un)registered >properly and it is named 'tor'. I think it's just mad because the package is 'tor-lsb' and the init.d file is 'tor'... Instead of the /etc/tor/.have-lsb, /etc/tor/.have-initng, /etc/tor/.have-minit, how about a '/bin/kill -HUP `cat /var/run/tor.pid 2>/dev/null` 2> /dev/null || true' (like httpd uses). That would work under any of those init schemes I would think. With the ghostscript BR added, builds fine nuder mock. Works fine on my test machine. It's even not very slow for web browsing. :) Thanks for working on this package... will be a good one to have. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From jspaleta at gmail.com Fri Dec 23 19:57:47 2005 From: jspaleta at gmail.com (Jeff Spaleta) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:57:47 -0500 Subject: Devel branch rebuilds In-Reply-To: <1135325022.28108.10.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> References: <1135224273.3547.6.camel@locolhost.localdomain> <604aa7910512221857v3d0ef03rb838b30016db6a2e@mail.gmail.com> <1135325022.28108.10.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> Message-ID: <604aa7910512231157r31a1c806tcce34d780a69394d@mail.gmail.com> On 12/23/05, Ville Skytt? wrote: > On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 21:57 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > > there seems to be some real oddities in the rawhide build environment still. > > I keep doing local mock builds of things and i have to explcitly pull > > in libXau-devel for nearly every application as a BuildRequires... > > which seems a bit odd to me. > > That's possibly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/176313 Could be related... but i haven't heard a decree as if this is a bug thats going to be fixed with changes in core.. or a bug we will have to learn to live with as a feature of modular X. -jef"It's not a bug... its a feature!"spaleta From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 20:07:57 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:07:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173927] Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512232007.jBNK7vNc006182@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173927 dennis at ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2005-12-23 15:07 EST ------- rpmlint output [dennis at asgard ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386-core/result/akode-2.0-1.fc5.i386.rpm E: akode invalid-soname /usr/lib/libakode_xiph_decoder.so libakode_xiph_decoder.so E: akode invalid-soname /usr/lib/libakode_alsa_sink.so libakode_alsa_sink.so E: akode invalid-soname /usr/lib/libakode_src_resampler.so libakode_src_resampler.so E: akode invalid-soname /usr/lib/libakode_mpc_decoder.so libakode_mpc_decoder.so E: akode invalid-soname /usr/lib/libakode_oss_sink.so libakode_oss_sink.so E: akode zero-length /usr/share/doc/akode-2.0/NEWS the invalid sonames i don't think are a huge deal i think rpmlint is complaining about the _ , NEWS file should be obmitted Good: md5sums match upstream Builds in mock for development on x86 Naming is ok good split on devel package I cant approve as this is assigned to someone else. but would do if its reassigned, and as along as no one objects to the sonames. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 20:36:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:36:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512232036.jBNKaGwb008639@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-23 15:36 EST ------- * Fri Dec 23 2005 Enrico Scholz - 0.1.0.15-1.11 - reworked the 'setgroups' patch so that 'tor' survives a SIGHUP - (re)added the 'reload' functionality to the lsb initscript and use it in logrotate http://ensc.de/fedora/tor.spec http://ensc.de/fedora/tor-0.1.0.15-1.11.src.rpm =========== > >Both initstyles are disabled by default. But they are both used on my > >systems and 'initng' is under review (bug #173459) so it may appear > >soon at least in Extras. > > Indeed, but they aren't currently in, so why add them now? You > can re-add those spec file bits and rebuild when/if they are > included. Until then they are just dead weight in the spec file. When I would remove the -initng/-minit subpackages somebody would probably ask why I have a single -lsb subpackage while no other init methods are provided ;) > >I would like to avoid it. It brings lot of huge dependencies which > >are useless when you want to use 'tor' with 'initng' or 'minit'. > > Yeah, but doesn't every other package in core and extras with an > init.d script already do that? I can't think of any other packages > that have an init.d script that package it seperately. Or am I just > missing some dependency there? I really want to avoid the bloaty initscripts/lsb; they add lot of stuff which is unneeded and there is no chance to modularize this package. 'initscripts' itself is not tight very much into the system; e.g. my tor-vserver (with 'tor-minit') has it only because of | $ LANG=C vrpm cheese -- -e --test initscripts | error: Failed dependencies: | initscripts >= 3.94 is needed by (installed) pam-0.79-9.6.i386 | initscripts >= 8.11-1 is needed by (installed) hotplug-2004_09_23-7.i386 'hotplug' is brought in by 'initscripts' and I just submitted a bug #176508 to remove the dependency in 'pam'. > Instead of the /etc/tor/.have-lsb, /etc/tor/.have-initng, > /etc/tor/.have-minit, how about a '/bin/kill -HUP `cat > /var/run/tor.pid 2>/dev/null` 2> /dev/null || true' (like httpd > uses). Does not work because 'initng' and 'minit' do not need/provide a pidfile. I find it also a little bit ... mmmh ... risky to send signals to a foreign process just because its pid appears in some file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 20:57:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:57:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176288] Review Request: kdemulimedia-extras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512232057.jBNKvQWN010627@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdemulimedia-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176288 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2005-12-23 15:57 EST ------- ok im still getting the backtrace. which is a big show stopper -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 21:42:47 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:42:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176288] Review Request: kdemulimedia-extras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512232142.jBNLglpp014675@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdemulimedia-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176288 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-23 16:42 EST ------- It appears that juk crashes for me too, as long as it has an empty playlist. Once you create a playlist with any song(s), it appears better. Heck, if you consider this a showstopper, I'll gladly (at least temporarily) disable juk so we can get this sucker out the door. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From ivazquez at ivazquez.net Fri Dec 23 21:47:22 2005 From: ivazquez at ivazquez.net (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:47:22 -0500 Subject: Package-finding script Message-ID: <1135374442.1969.17.camel@ignacio.lan> Here's a script I threw together to list all the packages owned by e-mail address. By default it uses your e-mail address (override with -e) extracted from ~/.plague-client.cfg (override with -f), and looks in owners/owners.list (override with -o). -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: getpackages.sh Type: application/x-shellscript Size: 664 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 21:49:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:49:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176288] Review Request: kdemulimedia-extras In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512232149.jBNLnIZ0015786@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kdemulimedia-extras https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176288 ------- Additional Comments From rdieter at math.unl.edu 2005-12-23 16:49 EST ------- %changelog * Fri Dec 23 2005 Rex Dieter 6:3.5.0-5 - disable juk (for now) Spec Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/SPECS/kdemultimedia-extras.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/all/SRPMS.stable/kdemultimedia-extras-3.5.0-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From wtogami at redhat.com Fri Dec 23 22:11:20 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:11:20 -0500 Subject: Rawhide blocker bug reports Message-ID: <43AC7608.7000902@redhat.com> Hey folks, If you file bugs against rawhide or FC components that are currently broken and causing build failures for Extras, please indicate in the report the impact. This is important for prioritization, because often the package maintainers don't immediately know the impact and that it is holding back other packages and it gets lost in a work queue. [PATCH] Please add this to the beginning of the summary name for the bug if the report contains a suggested patch or fix. This makes it far more obvious to the package maintainers that a potential solution is known and it might be quick to incorporate. They may either use it, or reject it giving a reason why it is unsuitable. Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 01:38:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 20:38:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512240138.jBO1cYPS003413@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2005-12-23 20:38 EST ------- 0.5.0 released ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 02:20:07 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:20:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176467] Review Request: alltray: Dock any application in the tray In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512240220.jBO2K7Qt008414@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alltray: Dock any application in the tray https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176467 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jspaleta at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2005-12-23 21:19 EST ------- - builds in mock for fc4 i386 - rpmlint returns clean on resulting binary - resulting binary seems to work as advertised on fc4 - md5sum c3b86dab94dbea416174d6e4dd82a173 alltray-0.65.tar.gz matches upstream source - pretty sure bug 176313 is keeping this from building in mock fc development It looks good to me. But I'm going to leave this in FE-Review for a couple of days and see if the rawhide issue gets fixed on its own, so I can make sure it builds in mock fc development. One minor nit, the host dl.sourceforge.net seems to be unreachable for me. But any of the sf mirrors like voxel.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge is working. Is there a general problem with dl.sourceforge.net or is it just me? Full Review: - GOOD: The package must be named according to the PackageNamingGuidelines. - GOOD: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec - GOOD: The package must meet the PackagingGuidelines. - GOOD: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of PackagingGuidelines. - GOOD: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - GOOD: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - GOOD: The spec file must be written in American English. - GOOD: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora Extras is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest ([WWW] http://www.ioccc.org/). - GOOD: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. - GOOD: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. - GOOD: A package must not contain any BuildRequires that are listed in the exceptions section of PackagingGuidelines. - GOOD: All other Build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. - N/A: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. - N/A: If the package contains shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths, that package must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: - N/A: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. - GOOD: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. The exception to this are directories listed explicitly in the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard ([WWW] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html), as it is safe to assume that those directories exist. - GOOD: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - GOOD: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. - GOOD: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - GOOD: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of PackagingGuidelines. - GOOD: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of PackagingGuidelines. - N/A: Large documentation files should go in a -docs subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) - GOOD: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - N/A: Header files or static libraries must be in a -devel package. - N/A: Files used by pkgconfig (.pc files) must be in a -devel package. - N/A: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - N/A: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. - N/A: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. - GOOD: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of PackagingGuidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 02:55:19 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512240255.jBO2tJMj010826@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2005-12-23 21:54 EST ------- 0.5.0 works on x86 64 for me without segfaulting. yay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sat Dec 24 03:14:09 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 22:14:09 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051224031409.304617FFA@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 2 cfitsio-3.005-0.1.beta.fc5 kmymoney2-0.8.1-7.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 03:26:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 22:26:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176467] Review Request: alltray: Dock any application in the tray In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512240326.jBO3QT2m014841@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alltray: Dock any application in the tray https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176467 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-23 22:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > One minor nit, the host dl.sourceforge.net seems to be unreachable for me. But > any of the sf mirrors like voxel.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge is working. > Is there a general problem with dl.sourceforge.net or is it just me? The first address the hostname resolves to seems unresponsive. I get around this by using the -t and -T arguments on wget, which get it to move to the second one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sat Dec 24 03:33:48 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 22:33:48 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051224033348.DC2097FFA@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 3 cfitsio-3.005-0.1.beta.fc4 liferea-1.0-1.fc4 perl-IO-Multiplex-1.08-4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Sat Dec 24 03:44:04 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 22:44:04 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051224034404.489FB7FFA@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 2 cfitsio-3.005-0.1.beta.fc3 perl-IO-Multiplex-1.08-4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 04:49:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:49:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512240449.jBO4nkBX026777@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2005-12-23 23:49 EST ------- 0.5.0 with nvidia binary drivers 8178 (tested on x86_64 rawhide) workaround: add the following to /etc/udev/links.conf: M nvidia0 c 195 0 M nvidia1 c 195 1 M nvidiactl c 195 255 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 04:58:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:58:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512240458.jBO4w065027376@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2005-12-23 23:57 EST ------- instead of the net script it would maybe make sense to startup /etc/init.d/network somehow. any better idea for approaching that? (per default the gen runlevel script didnt pick up my pppoe device in the auto start list). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 06:46:05 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 01:46:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512240646.jBO6k5Pc002816@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2005-12-24 01:45 EST ------- remaining issues: 08:16:28 system/swap : FAIL_STARTING 1101s. i guess i have to provide more input there. 08:17:28 system/firestarter : FAIL_STARTING 1365s. service firestarter restart works fine ;) 08:17:30 daemon/postfix : WAIT_FOR_PID_FILE 1687s. still waiting for pid. whereas: service postfix status tells me: master (PID 4531) wird ausgef?hrt... (service is running) 08:16:27 daemon/nvidia-glx : FAIL_STARTING 1750s. this one fails either but then again... it didnt work for me at all. i used themethod from comment #136 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 06:46:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 01:46:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176523] New: Review Request: python-json: A JSON reader and writer for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176523 Summary: Review Request: python-json: A JSON reader and writer for Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: ivazquez at ivazquez.net QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/python-json.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/python-json-3_4-1.src.rpm Description: json.py is an implementation of a JSON (http://json.org) reader and writer in Python. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 07:02:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 02:02:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176006] Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512240702.jBO72QQM003997@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176006 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2005-12-24 02:02 EST ------- but theres the question if those plugins should maybe be split off... its not worth it but well i see bogus bug reports coming if this doesent go to the faq e.g. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 07:55:30 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 02:55:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176525] New: Review Request: setuptools: Download, build, install, upgrade, and uninstall Python packages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176525 Summary: Review Request: setuptools: Download, build, install, upgrade, and uninstall Python packages Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: ivazquez at ivazquez.net QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/python-setuptools.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/python-setuptools-0.6a8-1.src.rpm Description: setuptools is a collection of enhancements to the Python distutils that allow you to more easily build and distribute Python packages, especially ones that have dependencies on other packages. Known issues: W: python-setuptools invalid-license PSFL/ZPL E: python-setuptools zero-length /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/setuptools-0.6a8-py2.4.egg/EGG-INFO/not-zip-safe I'm reluctant to touch the second issue seeing as I have no clue how eggs work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 08:00:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:00:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512240800.jBO80Ris008765@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From che666 at gmail.com 2005-12-24 03:00 EST ------- reduced the problems to: 08:17:30 daemon/postfix : WAIT_FOR_PID_FILE 1687s. still waiting for pid. whereas: service postfix status tells me: master (PID 4531) wird ausgef?hrt... (service is running) 08:16:27 daemon/nvidia-glx : FAIL_STARTING 1750s. this one fails either but then again... it didnt work for me at all. i used themethod from comment #136 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 08:07:45 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:07:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512240807.jBO87jl9009423@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-24 03:07 EST ------- what about the selinux issue? 0.4.8-svn does not seem to initalize it at all (all files become unlabled) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 08:30:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 03:30:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176526] New: Review Request: TestGears: Unit testing for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176526 Summary: Review Request: TestGears: Unit testing for Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: ivazquez at ivazquez.net QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/python-TestGears.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/python-TestGears-0.2-1.src.rpm Description: TestGears provides automatic discovery of unittest.TestCases and the ability to run tests that are written as simple functions. It generates a standard unittest.TestSuite for use with any of the standard frontends, and provides a distutils command to run tests with zero configuration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 09:51:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 04:51:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176528] New: Review Request: MochiKit: A lightweight JavaScript library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176528 Summary: Review Request: MochiKit: A lightweight JavaScript library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: ivazquez at ivazquez.net QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/MochiKit.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/MochiKit-1.1-1.src.rpm Description: MochiKit is a highly-documented and well-tested suite of JavaScript libraries that will help you get stuff done, fast. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 10:44:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 05:44:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512241044.jBOAiX53023339@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-24 05:44 EST ------- fwiw, two patches to make 'atd' and 'smartd' work better with initng: * bug #176530 (smartmontools) and bug #176486 (at) When applied, the pidfile hack can be removed. Chances are bad (nearly zero for at) that upstream applies them but they are perhaps for interest for other initng distributions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 11:31:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 06:31:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176532] New: Review Request: TurboGears: Back-to-front web development in Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176532 Summary: Review Request: TurboGears: Back-to-front web development in Python Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: ivazquez at ivazquez.net QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/TurboGears.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/TurboGears-0.8a5-1.src.rpm Description: TurboGears takes the best components available and combines them into one easy-to-install, documented whole. TurboGears includes parts that join the pieces together and make them work together seamlessly, but doesn't obscure each included project. This allows you to take advantage of all existing documentation, articles, mailing lists and other resources that have built up in the communities for each project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 12:36:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 07:36:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169624] Review Request: TestDisk, tool to check and undelete partition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512241236.jBOCabe1001367@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TestDisk, tool to check and undelete partition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169624 fedora at leemhuis.info changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at leemhuis.info OtherBugsDependingO| |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2005-12-24 07:36 EST ------- >It's my first FC Extra package and I am seeking a sponsor. I can do that. No full review yet, just the things I saw on a first sight: -- Using these macros seems unnescaccary and confusing to me: %define name testdisk %define ver 6.2 %define rel 1 You IMHO should remove them -- Could you remove this: #Packager: Christophe GRENIER -- Please change BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-buildroot to BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -- The description is IMHO way to long. Why not something like: Tool to check and undelete partition. Works with FAT12, FAT16, FAT32, NTFS, EXT2, EXT3, BeFS .... And the question is wether ntfs is allowed to be supported if this porgramm hits fedora extras. What exactly does it to support NTFS? Could is be in conflict with patents around NTFS? -- during configure I noticed: >checking for ntfs_device_mount in -lntfs... no >configure: WARNING: No ntfs library detected >checking for libreiserfs_get_version in -lreiserfs... no >configure: WARNING: No reiserfs library detected Is that correct? There are several other checks that result in "no" -- Could you check if they can be ignored safely? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 15:27:01 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:27:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169624] Review Request: TestDisk, tool to check and undelete partition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512241527.jBOFR12M012590@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TestDisk, tool to check and undelete partition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169624 ------- Additional Comments From grenier at cgsecurity.org 2005-12-24 10:26 EST ------- I have updated the spec file according to your remarks. Be supporting NTFS, it only means TestDisk can decode the NTFS boot sector, it doesn't mean it can read/write NTFS partition. ntfs and reiserfs library aren't shipped in fedora. TestDisk can work without them, they are only necessary if you want to be able to list the files from ReiserFS 3.5/2.6 and NTFS partition. So there is no problem between TestDisk and potential patents around NTFS. It's not a problem if there are a lot of "no" during configure. TestDisk can be compiled on a lot of architecture and plateforme, so it has to check a lot of thinks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 15:42:53 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 10:42:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169624] Review Request: TestDisk, tool to check and undelete partition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512241542.jBOFgrEA013763@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TestDisk, tool to check and undelete partition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169624 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2005-12-24 10:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > I have updated the spec file according to your remarks. And you did not increase the Release -- please do this the next time. That's easier and avoids confusion, even during review. > Be supporting NTFS, it only means TestDisk can decode the NTFS boot sector, > it doesn't mean it can read/write NTFS partition. That might be okay. But I'll recheck with Fesco/Legal. > ntfs and reiserfs library aren't shipped in fedora. TestDisk can work without > them, they are only necessary if you want to be able to list the files from > ReiserFS 3.5/2.6 and NTFS partition. Okay. > It's not a problem if there are a lot of "no" during configure. Sure, I just wanted to be sure that you checked them. ;-) One other thing I just noticed that I'm not sure about myself. The spec file has: %doc %{_mandir}/man1/testdisk.1* %doc %{_mandir}/man1/photorec.1* Uhh, do we ship man pages as doc? To answer my own question: Seems we sometimes do according to a grep through a extras cvs checkout [rpmbuild at truhe devel]$ grep /man./ */*.spec | grep \%doc | wc -l 35 [rpmbuild at truhe devel]$ grep /man./ */*.spec | wc -l 1071 @fedora-extras-list: Any option on this? IMHO man pages should not be marked as %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 16:22:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 11:22:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176434] Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512241622.jBOGMFLG016847@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176434 ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2005-12-24 11:22 EST ------- Seeking advice: Apparently, Sony Vaio laptops are not available in every architecture (no ppc for example). Should I limit the architectures this package would build for? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 17:36:51 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:36:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172042] Review Request: cfitsio -- library to read and write FITS files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512241736.jBOHapL2021180@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cfitsio -- library to read and write FITS files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172042 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2005-12-24 12:36 EST ------- > %build > FC=g95 > export FC > %configure --prefix=%{buildroot}/%{_prefix} > --includedir=%{buildroot}/%{_includedir}/%{name} Caution! %buildroot ought not be specified in the %build section. It bears the risk that the paths enter binaries (or other files). Only use %buildroot in the %install section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 17:41:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:41:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173090] Review Request: hpic -- Healpix manipulation binaries and library In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512241741.jBOHfE9I021386@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hpic -- Healpix manipulation binaries and library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173090 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2005-12-24 12:41 EST ------- > %files devel > %{_libdir}/libhpic.so %defattr(..) missing. If rebuilt, files in binary package will be owned by build user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk Sat Dec 24 18:02:32 2005 From: paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk (Paul F. Johnson) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 18:02:32 +0000 Subject: Rawhide blocker bug reports In-Reply-To: <43AC7608.7000902@redhat.com> References: <43AC7608.7000902@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1135447353.3890.7.camel@T7.Linux> Hi, > If you file bugs against rawhide or FC components that are currently > broken and causing build failures for Extras, please indicate in the > report the impact. This is important for prioritization, because often > the package maintainers don't immediately know the impact and that it is > holding back other packages and it gets lost in a work queue. I'm not sure if this is breaking anything in extras, but I know it's a pain when trying to compile against, but vte seems somewhat jiggered. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176346 has the details. TTFN Paul -- main(t,_,a) char*a;{return!0 Message-ID: <200512241855.jBOItsGD026446@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hpic -- Healpix manipulation binaries and library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173090 ------- Additional Comments From matt at truch.net 2005-12-24 13:55 EST ------- Re comment 7(In reply to comment #7) > > %files devel > > %{_libdir}/libhpic.so > > %defattr(..) missing. If rebuilt, files in binary package will be owned > by build user. > You're right. Fixed in 0.52-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 19:00:36 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 14:00:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175494] Review Request: new In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512241900.jBOJ0atb026743@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175494 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2005-12-24 14:00 EST ------- > %files devel > %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/new.pc > %{_includedir}/new > %{_libdir}/lib*.so Missing %defattr(..). If built, files in binary package will be owned by the build user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugs.michael at gmx.net Sat Dec 24 19:10:46 2005 From: bugs.michael at gmx.net (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:10:46 +0100 Subject: owners owners.list,1.459,1.460 In-Reply-To: <200512170504.jBH54AdA012188@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> References: <200512170504.jBH54AdA012188@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Message-ID: <20051224201046.08ec12ad.bugs.michael@gmx.net> Huh? What did you do there? Please explain all these changes to owners.list. It looks to me like damage which must be repaired. On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:03:40 -0500, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Author: luya > > Update of /cvs/extras/owners > In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10578 > > Modified Files: > owners.list > Log Message: > > > > Index: owners.list > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/extras/owners/owners.list,v > retrieving revision 1.459 > retrieving revision 1.460 > diff -u -r1.459 -r1.460 > --- owners.list 17 Dec 2005 02:12:17 -0000 1.459 > +++ owners.list 17 Dec 2005 05:03:29 -0000 1.460 > @@ -96,7 +96,6 @@ > Fedora Extras|cgoban|X board for playing go|compton at pcompton.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|check|A unit test framework for C|tcallawa at redhat.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|chkrootkit|A tool to locally check for signs of a rootkit|bugs.michael at gmx.net|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|chmlib|Library for dealing with ITSS/CHM format files|lemenkov at newmail.ru|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|cksfv|Utility to manipulate SFV files|extras-orphan at fedoraproject.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|clamav|End-user tools for the Clam Antivirus scanner|enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|clisp|Common Lisp (ANSI CL) implementation|gemi at bluewin.ch|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > @@ -158,7 +157,7 @@ > Fedora Extras|drivel|A journal or "blog" client|katzj at redhat.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|drscheme|Graphical environment for developing programs using Scheme|gemi at bluewin.ch|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|dumpasn1|ASN.1 object dump utility|ville.skytta at iki.fi|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|duplicity|Untrusted/encrypted backup using rsync algorithm|extras-orphan at fedoraproject.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|duplicity|Untrusted/encrypted backup using rsync algorithm|bescoto at stanford.edu|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|dvb-apps|Utility, demo and test applications using the Linux DVB API|ville.skytta at iki.fi|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|dvdisaster|CD/DVD media data loss/scratch/aging protection|dmitry at butskoy.name|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|carsten at dvdisaster.de > Fedora Extras|dxpc|A Differential X Protocol Compressor|rdieter at math.unl.edu|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > @@ -235,16 +234,17 @@ > Fedora Extras|gai-temp|GAI based applet that displays HDD and CPU temperature|bugs.michael at gmx.net|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gajim|Jabber client written in PyGTK|gajownik at gmail.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|galculator|GTK 2 based scientific calculator|compton at pcompton.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|galeon|GNOME2 Web browser based on Mozilla|denis at poolshark.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|galeon|GNOME2 Web browser based on Mozilla|denisleroy at yahoo.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gambas|IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions|tcallawa at redhat.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gazpacho|Glade Interface Creator|icon at fedoraproject.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gc|C++ Garbage Collector|rdieter at math.unl.edu|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gcfilms|Movies collections management|tian at c-sait.net|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gcl|GNU Common Lisp|gemi at bluewin.ch|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gcombust|Powerful GTK+ front-end for mkisofs and cdrecord|matthias at rpmforge.net|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|gconfmm20|A C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X)|denis at poolshark.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|gconfmm26|A C++ wrapper for GConf2|denis at poolshark.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|gconfmm20|A C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X)|denisleroy at yahoo.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|gconfmm26|A C++ wrapper for GConf2|denisleroy at yahoo.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gdeskcal|Eye-candy calendar for your desktop.|compton at pcompton.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|gdesklets|Advanced architecture for desktop applets|luya256 at yahoo.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gdl|GNU Data Language|orion at cora.nwra.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gdome2|DOM level 2 library for accessing XML files|ville.skytta at iki.fi|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|general|For bugs not specific to any single component.|dkl at redhat.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ > Fedora Extras|gktools|GUI utilities for KerberosV tickets|nos at utelsystems.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gl-117|GL-117 is an action flight simulator|steve at silug.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|glabels|A program for creating labels and business cards for GNOME|jspaleta at gmail.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|glibmm24|A C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X)|denis at poolshark.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|glibmm24|A C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X)|denisleroy at yahoo.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|Glide3|Glide3 runtime for the 3Dfx Voodoo family of cards|j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|global|A source code tag system|gemi at bluewin.ch|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|glpk|GNU Linear Programming Kit|qspencer at ieee.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ > Fedora Extras|gnome-theme-clearlooks-bigpack|Additional Clearlooks color schemes|ivazquez at ivazquez.net|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gnome-themes-extras|Collection of metathemes for the GNOME desktop environment|compton at pcompton.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gnome-translate|GNOME interface to libtranslate -- Natural language translator|dmitry at butskoy.name|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|gnome-vfsmm26|C++ wrapper for gnome-vfs|denis at poolshark.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|gnome-vfsmm26|C++ wrapper for gnome-vfs|denisleroy at yahoo.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gnotime|Tracks and reports time spent|toshio at tiki-lounge.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gnuchess|The GNU chess program|kaboom at oobleck.net|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gnugo|Text based go program|compton at pcompton.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > @@ -334,8 +334,8 @@ > Fedora Extras|gtkglext|OpenGL Extension to GTK|rc040203 at freenet.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gtk-gnutella|GUI based Gnutella Client|dmitry at butskoy.name|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gtkmathview|Library for rendering MathML documents|uwog at uwog.net|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|gtkmm20|A C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X)|denis at poolshark.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|gtkmm24|A C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X)|denis at poolshark.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|gtkmm20|A C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X)|denisleroy at yahoo.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|gtkmm24|A C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X)|denisleroy at yahoo.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|Gtk-Perl|Perl extensions for GTK+|matthias at rpmforge.net|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gtk-qt-engine|a project allowing GTK to use Qt widget styles|rdieter at math.unl.edu|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|gtktalog|The GNOME disk catalog|matthias at rpmforge.net|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ > Fedora Extras|imlib2|A graphic library for file loading, saving, rendering, and manipulation|anvil at livna.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|inadyn|A Dynamic DNS Client|Jochen at herr-schmitt.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|initng|A full replacement of SysVinit|daner964 at student.liu.se|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|inkscape|A vector-based drawing program using SVG|denis at poolshark.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|inkscape|A vector-based drawing program using SVG|compton at pcompton.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|inti|Integrated Foundation Classes for GNOME and GTK+|gemi at bluewin.ch|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|intuitively|Automatic IP detection utility|pertusus at free.fr|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|Inventor|SGI Open Inventor (TM)|rc040203 at freenet.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > @@ -478,15 +478,15 @@ > Fedora Extras|libgcrypt1|A general-purpose cryptography library|bugs.michael at gmx.net|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|libgda|Library for writing gnome database programs|j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|libgdamm|C++ wrappers for libgda|tcallawa at redhat.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|libglademm20|A C++ wrapper for libglade|denis at poolshark.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|libglademm24|A C++ wrapper for libglade|denis at poolshark.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|libgnomecanvasmm20|A C++ interface for Gnome libs (a GUI library for X)|denis at poolshark.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|libgnomecanvasmm26|A C++ interface for Gnome libs (a GUI library for X)|denis at poolshark.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|libglademm20|A C++ wrapper for libglade|denisleroy at yahoo.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|libglademm24|A C++ wrapper for libglade|denisleroy at yahoo.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|libgnomecanvasmm20|A C++ interface for Gnome libs (a GUI library for X)|denisleroy at yahoo.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|libgnomecanvasmm26|A C++ interface for Gnome libs (a GUI library for X)|denisleroy at yahoo.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|libgnomedb|Library for writing gnome database programs|j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|libgnomemm20|A C++ interface for Gnome libs (a GUI library for X)|denis at poolshark.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|libgnomemm26|A C++ interface for Gnome libs (a GUI library for X)|denis at poolshark.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|libgnomeuimm20|A C++ interface for Gnome libs (a GUI library for X)|denis at poolshark.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|libgnomeuimm26|A C++ interface for Gnome libs (a GUI library for X)|denis at poolshark.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|libgnomemm20|A C++ interface for Gnome libs (a GUI library for X)|denisleroy at yahoo.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|libgnomemm26|A C++ interface for Gnome libs (a GUI library for X)|denisleroy at yahoo.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|libgnomeuimm20|A C++ interface for Gnome libs (a GUI library for X)|denisleroy at yahoo.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|libgnomeuimm26|A C++ interface for Gnome libs (a GUI library for X)|denisleroy at yahoo.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|libgsf113|GNOME Structured File library 1.13|j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|libibverbs|A library for direct userspace use of InfiniBand|rolandd at cisco.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|libid3tag|ID3 tag manipulation library|ville.skytta at iki.fi|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ > Fedora Extras|libsexy|Funky fresh graphical widgets for GTK+ 2|ivazquez at ivazquez.net|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|libshout|icecast source streaming library|thomas at apestaart.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|libsidplay|A Commodore 64 music player and SID chip emulator library|bugs.michael at gmx.net|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|libsigc++20|The Typesafe Signal Framework for C++|denis at poolshark.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > +Fedora Extras|libsigc++20|The Typesafe Signal Framework for C++|denisleroy at yahoo.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|libsigc++|Typesafe Signal Framework for C++|compton at pcompton.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|libsigsegv|Handling page faults in user mode|rdieter at math.unl.edu|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|libsndfile|A library for reading and writing sound files|anvil at livna.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > @@ -717,7 +717,6 @@ > Fedora Extras|perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-Type|Determine type information for columns|tcallawa at redhat.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com > Fedora Extras|perl-Class-DBI|Simple Database Abstraction|tcallawa at redhat.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com > Fedora Extras|perl-Class-DBI-SQLite|Extension to Class::DBI for sqlite|tcallawa at redhat.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com > -Fedora Extras|perl-Class-ErrorHandler|Class::ErrorHandler Perl module|extras-orphan at fedoraproject.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com > Fedora Extras|perl-Class-Inspector|Get information about a class and its structure|rc040203 at freenet.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com > Fedora Extras|perl-Class-MethodMaker|Create generic methods for OO Perl|dgregor at redhat.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com > Fedora Extras|perl-Class-ReturnValue|Class::ReturnValue Perl module|rc040203 at freenet.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com > @@ -741,7 +740,6 @@ > Fedora Extras|perl-DateTime|DateTime Perl module|steve at silug.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com > Fedora Extras|perl-DBD-SQLite2|Self Contained RDBMS in a DBI Driver (sqlite 2.x)|tcallawa at redhat.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com > Fedora Extras|perl-DBD-SQLite|Self Contained RDBMS in a DBI Driver|jpo at di.uminho.pt|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com > -Fedora Extras|perl-DBD-XBase|Perl module for reading and writing the dbf files|jpo at di.uminho.pt|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com > Fedora Extras|perl-DBIx-ContextualFetch|Add contextual fetches to DBI|tcallawa at redhat.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com > Fedora Extras|perl-DBIx-DBSchema|Database-independent schema objects|rc040203 at freenet.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com > Fedora Extras|perl-DBIx-SearchBuilder|Encapsulate SQL queries and rows in simple perl objects|rc040203 at freenet.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org|fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com > @@ -1038,7 +1036,6 @@ > Fedora Extras|R-hdf5|R Interface to the NCSA HDF5 library|tcallawa at redhat.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|rinetd|TCP redirection server|kaboom at oobleck.net|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|rkhunter|Rootkit Hunter scans for rootkits, backdoors and local exploits|tamaster at pobox.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|rlog|Runtime Logging for C++|lemenkov at newmail.ru|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|R-mAr|R module to evaluate functions for multivariate AutoRegressive analysis|jamatos at fc.up.pt|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|rocksndiamonds|Underground digging game|tcallawa at redhat.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|roundup|Simple and flexible issue-tracking system|redhat at flyn.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > @@ -1136,7 +1133,6 @@ > Fedora Extras|taarich|Display Hebrew date|danken at cs.technion.ac.il|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|taglib|Audio Meta-Data Library|gauret at free.fr|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|tagtool|Ogg Vorbis and MP3 tag manager|bdpepple at ameritech.net|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|tcldom|DOM bindings for Tcl|wart at kobold.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|tclhttpd|Tcl Web+Application server|wart at kobold.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|tcllib|Standard Tcl library|wart at kobold.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|tclxml|XML parser for Tcl|wart at kobold.org|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > @@ -1239,29 +1235,19 @@ > Fedora Extras|xemacs-sumo|XEmacs Lisp packages|ville.skytta at iki.fi|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|xfcalendar|Time-managing application for Xfce4|kevin-redhat-bugzilla at tummy.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|xfce4-appfinder|Appfinder for the Xfce4 Desktop Environment|kevin-redhat-bugzilla at tummy.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|xfce4-battery-plugin|Battery monitor for the Xfce panel|fedora.wickert at arcor.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|xfce4-clipman-plugin|Clipboard manager plugin for the Xfce panel|fedora.wickert at arcor.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|xfce4-cpugraph-plugin|CPU monitor for the Xfce panel|fedora.wickert at arcor.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|xfce4-datetime-plugin|Date/time plugin for the Xfce panel|fedora.wickert at arcor.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|xfce4-genmon-plugin|Generic monitor plugin for the Xfce panel|fedora.wickert at arcor.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|xfce4-iconbox|Icon box for the Xfce4 Desktop Environment|kevin-redhat-bugzilla at tummy.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|xfce4-icon-theme|Icons for Xfce|kevin-redhat-bugzilla at tummy.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|xfce4-mixer|Volume control plugin for the Xfce4 panel|kevin-redhat-bugzilla at tummy.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|xfce4-minicmd-plugin|Mini command-line plugin for the Xfce panel|fedora.wickert at arcor.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|xfce4-modemlights-plugin|Modemlights for the XFCE panel|fedora.wickert at arcor.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|xfce4-notes-plugin|Notes plugin for the Xfce panel|fedora.wickert at arcor.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|xfce4-panel|Next generation panel for Xfce|kevin-redhat-bugzilla at tummy.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|xfce4-session|Session manager for the Xfce4 desktop|kevin-redhat-bugzilla at tummy.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|xfce4-showdesktop-plugin|Show-Desktop plugin for the Xfce panel|fedora.wickert at arcor.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|xfce4-systemload-plugin|Systemload monitor for the Xfce panel|fedora.wickert at arcor.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|xfce4-systray|Systray for the Xfce4 Desktop Environment|kevin-redhat-bugzilla at tummy.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|xfce4-taskbar-plugin|Tasklist plugin for the Xfce panel|fedora.wickert at arcor.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|xfce4-toys|Small Xfce4 applications|kevin-redhat-bugzilla at tummy.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|xfce4-trigger-launcher|Trigger launcher for Xfce4 panel|kevin-redhat-bugzilla at tummy.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|xfce4-wavelan-plugin|WaveLAN plugin for the Xfce panel|fedora.wickert at arcor.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|xfce4-weather-plugin|Weather plugin for the Xfce panel|fedora.wickert at arcor.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|xfce4-windowlist-plugin|Windowlist plugin for the Xfce panel|fedora.wickert at arcor.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|xfce4-xkb-plugin|XKB layout switcher for the Xfce panel|fedora.wickert at arcor.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|xfce4-xmms-plugin|Control XMMS from the Xfce panel|fedora.wickert at arcor.de|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|xfce-mcs-manager|Multi channel settings manager|kevin-redhat-bugzilla at tummy.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|xfce-mcs-plugins|Plugins for multi channel settings manager|kevin-redhat-bugzilla at tummy.com|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > @@ -1308,4 +1294,3 @@ > Fedora Extras|fdupes|Identifies and optionally deletes duplicate files|simonb at thoughtpolice.co.uk|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|nsd|NSD is a complete implementation of an authoritative DNS name server|paul at xtdnet.nl|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > Fedora Extras|ldns|Lowlevel DNS(SEC) library with API|paul at xtdnet.nl|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > -Fedora Extras|l2tpd|Layer 2 Tunnelling Protocol Daemon (RFC 2661)|paul at xtdnet.nl|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org| > From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 20:09:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:09:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175494] Review Request: new In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512242009.jBOK9nEM032217@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175494 ------- Additional Comments From redhat at flyn.org 2005-12-24 15:09 EST ------- new-1.3.5-3 is now in CVS. This version fixes the issue raised in command #5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From dcbw at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 20:13:55 2005 From: dcbw at redhat.com (Dan Williams) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 15:13:55 -0500 Subject: seeing config.log for a failed build In-Reply-To: <20051223091644.GC2856@free.fr> References: <20051223091644.GC2856@free.fr> Message-ID: <1135455235.6408.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 10:16 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote: > Hello, > > I have some builds (grads) that fails with a ./configure error. Is there a > mean to have a look at the config.log file (not a big deal otherwise, I'll > just ExcludeArch)? > > (it is on x86_64 arch which I cannot test myself). Unfortunately there's not enough intelligence in the buildsys right now to find and grab the config.log before it blows away the buildroot. But that's probably something I should add. Can you file a bug against "Fedora Infrastructure" (assigned to me) just noting that the buildsys should try to grab config.log, if it exists, along with the other build logs? Are there any other files (like config.log) that are almost certainly going to be there for most packages that should be picked up as well? Dan From fedora at leemhuis.info Sat Dec 24 22:29:42 2005 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 23:29:42 +0100 Subject: owners owners.list,1.459,1.460 In-Reply-To: <20051224201046.08ec12ad.bugs.michael@gmx.net> References: <200512170504.jBH54AdA012188@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <20051224201046.08ec12ad.bugs.michael@gmx.net> Message-ID: <1135463382.2832.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Am Samstag, den 24.12.2005, 20:10 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt: > Huh? What did you do there? Please explain all these changes to > owners.list. It looks to me like damage which must be repaired. That was repaired soon after the wrong commit afaics: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/owners/owners.list?root=extras&r1=1.460&r2=1.461 -- Thorsten Leemhuis From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 24 23:13:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 18:13:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170504] Review Request: makebootfat - Utility for creation bootable FAT disk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512242313.jBONDdk3012671@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makebootfat - Utility for creation bootable FAT disk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170504 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-24 18:13 EST ------- OK, after reading the FHS I see that /usr/lib is the place for "internal binaries". A boot sector and an executable qualify. Note that under 64 bit these will appear under /usr/lib64, which is misleading. You may want to force /usr/lib As per comment 1, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From wtogami at redhat.com Sun Dec 25 06:13:20 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:13:20 -0500 Subject: owners owners.list,1.459,1.460 In-Reply-To: <1135463382.2832.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200512170504.jBH54AdA012188@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <20051224201046.08ec12ad.bugs.michael@gmx.net> <1135463382.2832.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <43AE3880.2040607@redhat.com> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Am Samstag, den 24.12.2005, 20:10 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt: >> Huh? What did you do there? Please explain all these changes to >> owners.list. It looks to me like damage which must be repaired. > > That was repaired soon after the wrong commit afaics: > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/owners/owners.list?root=extras&r1=1.460&r2=1.461 I realized that I made a mistake after approving luya too early. After he was sponsored, I was alarmed when it was necessary to teach him to use command line ssh which he had never used before in order to understand cvs+ssh. It seems that he tries hard but lacks a basic understanding of many of the basic tools. The package(s) he got approved was largely the result of hand holding without personal understanding. And now this owners.list accident born from the lack of understanding of basic tools... I'm guessing text editor line wrapping? As I made the mistake of sponsoring too soon, it is my responsibility to further luya's education, but realistically I don't feel good about this as a precedent. It is unrealistic to hand-hold everyone who wants to try hard but lacks background knowledge. We cannot scale as a project if we have to constantly "give fish" to people, as they are too far from the skills necessary to learn to "catch fish" for themselves. Perhaps luya is already well on his way to learning the necessary skills, wont repeat this mistake, and will be a productive contributor into the future. OTOH I want to avoid this kind of mistake in the future. This mail was mostly me thinking to myself out loud. Will think about solutions later... Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 25 07:55:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 02:55:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176542] New: Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176542 Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: toth_bandi at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://gnome-yum.sourceforge.net/download/gnome-yum.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://gnome-yum.sourceforge.net/download/gnome-yum-0.1.2-1.ta.1.fc4.src.rpm Description: GNOME Interface for YUM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 25 09:00:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:00:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176542] Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512250900.jBP90xoC018297@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176542 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-25 04:00 EST ------- your spec file is autogenerated. look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines and edit your file by hand. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 25 09:22:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 04:22:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175438] Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512250922.jBP9MORj023990@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: smart -- Next generation package handling tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175438 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-25 04:22 EST ------- 0.41 is out, should contain a faster rpm-md parser. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From fedora at leemhuis.info Sun Dec 25 14:05:40 2005 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:05:40 +0100 Subject: owners owners.list,1.459,1.460 In-Reply-To: <43AE3880.2040607@redhat.com> References: <200512170504.jBH54AdA012188@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <20051224201046.08ec12ad.bugs.michael@gmx.net> <1135463382.2832.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43AE3880.2040607@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1135519540.2888.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> Am Sonntag, den 25.12.2005, 01:13 -0500 schrieb Warren Togami: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Am Samstag, den 24.12.2005, 20:10 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt: > >> Huh? What did you do there? Please explain all these changes to > >> owners.list. It looks to me like damage which must be repaired. > > > > That was repaired soon after the wrong commit afaics: > > http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/owners/owners.list?root=extras&r1=1.460&r2=1.461 > > I realized that I made a mistake after approving luya too early. [...] > This mail was mostly me thinking to myself out loud. Will think about > solutions later... I'd like to add one thing to your thinking -- some of his reviews simply had a ---- Congragulations, your src.rpm has succesfully passed the test including rpmlint with built rpm and mock. The spec file fully complies with Packaging Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines. It is the honor to get [...] package status as FE-ACCEPTED ---- or similar statements. Some other people do it like this, too. I would feel much more comfortable if we would have a statement like the following in the Review Guidelines: "The Reviewer in the bugreport has to explicit list all the important things he checked when approving a package." For example at least something like the following should be posted when approving a package: ---- * rpmlint is happy * builds in mock (FC-4 and rawhide) * clean installation and removal * spec looks good * source matches upstream APPROVED ---- or (in an ideal world): ---- - rpmlint checks return: W: [....] no-documentation Safe to ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (LGPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r APPROVED ---- (both examples taken from other reviews) Comments? CU thl -- Thorsten Leemhuis From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 25 14:55:19 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176109] Review Request: pytraffic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512251455.jBPEtJ6Q021596@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pytraffic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176109 ------- Additional Comments From michel.vandenbergh at uhasselt.be 2005-12-25 09:55 EST ------- I wonder if there are any more comments? This is my first package so if it would be approved for inclusion I would need sponsoring... Merry Christmas! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bdpepple at ameritech.net Sun Dec 25 15:02:23 2005 From: bdpepple at ameritech.net (Brian Pepple) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:02:23 -0500 Subject: owners owners.list,1.459,1.460 In-Reply-To: <1135519540.2888.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200512170504.jBH54AdA012188@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <20051224201046.08ec12ad.bugs.michael@gmx.net> <1135463382.2832.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43AE3880.2040607@redhat.com> <1135519540.2888.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1135522943.9166.26.camel@shuttle.273piedmont.com> On Sun, 2005-12-25 at 15:05 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 25.12.2005, 01:13 -0500 schrieb Warren Togami: > > I realized that I made a mistake after approving luya too early. > [...] > > This mail was mostly me thinking to myself out loud. Will think about > > solutions later... > > I'd like to add one thing to your thinking -- some of his reviews simply > had a > ---- > Congragulations, your src.rpm has succesfully passed the test including > rpmlint > with built rpm and mock. > > The spec file fully complies with Packaging Guidelines > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines. > > It is the honor to get [...] package status as FE-ACCEPTED <- Snip -> > Comments? I agree, some of the reviews were also done before he even had a package accepted into FE, which troubles me. Ex. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173671 I think some of the problems we are experiencing, is due to some problems with step 7 in new contributors instructions. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors It seems that we are not taking enough time in ensuring that a thorough review is being given to contributor's first package by the appropriate people. For example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176096#c10 Part of the problem is the limited time available to people able to sponsor new participants due to being fairly busy with other aspects of FE (Seth, Spot, Warren, etc.). Then you add new participants impatience with having their first package accepted into FE, and you can see why step 7 isn't being followed as closely as it should be. /B -- Brian Pepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 25 15:55:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:55:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171624] Review Request: mimetic -- A full featured MIME library written in C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512251555.jBPFtNhb026353@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mimetic -- A full featured MIME library written in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171624 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |bugs.michael at gmx.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2005-12-25 10:55 EST ------- IMO, the authors ought to avoid putting a header file "config.h" into the API and in a top-level search location. Not only because of the HAVE_FOO definitions, but also because it increases the risk of search path precedence conflicts in applications which may use an own config.h file. * source verified against upstream locations * rpmlint is silent * spec file looks good * patch reviewed * builds fine on FC4 * binary package listings look good APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 25 16:12:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:12:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176434] Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512251612.jBPGCFoE027273@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176434 ------- Additional Comments From stickster at gmail.com 2005-12-25 11:12 EST ------- That would make sense to me. Vaio only comes in i386, right? :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 25 16:18:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:18:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173181] Review Request: buoh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512251618.jBPGIxMS027605@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buoh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173181 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |bugs.michael at gmx.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2005-12-25 11:18 EST ------- * Fails to build here (FC4): RPM build errors: File not found: /home/qa/tmp/rpm/tmp/buoh-0.8.1-1-root-qa/usr/share/buoh File not found: /home/qa/tmp/rpm/tmp/buoh-0.8.1-1-root-qa/usr/share/buoh/comics File not found: /home/qa/tmp/rpm/tmp/buoh-0.8.1-1-root-qa/usr/share/buoh/ui File not found: /home/qa/tmp/rpm/tmp/buoh-0.8.1-1-root-qa/usr/share/buoh/comics/comics.xml File not found by glob: /home/qa/tmp/rpm/tmp/buoh-0.8.1-1-root-qa/usr/share/buoh/pixmaps/buoh*.png File not found: /home/qa/tmp/rpm/tmp/buoh-0.8.1-1-root-qa/usr/share/buoh/ui/buoh-ui.xml Examining the buildroot, it installed into /usr/buoh instead of /usr/share/buoh. * Remove the hardcoded list of "Requires", because in this case all of them ought to be left to RPM's automatic SONAME dependencies. To verify, run "rpm --query buoh-0.8.1-1.i386.rpm" and notice dependencies like libgconf-2.so.4, libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0, libsoup-2.2.so.7, libgnomeui-2.so.0. Package tools know in which RPM packages to find those library names. * Missing %postun scriptlet, which runs ldconfig and which uninstalls the GConf schema files with --makefile-uninstall-rule. * Missing "Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig GConf2" and "Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig GConf2", particularly since /usr/bin/gconftool-2 must still be installed before the package would be uninstalled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 25 16:47:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:47:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173054] Review Request: wavpack - completely open audiocodec In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512251647.jBPGlZAr029131@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wavpack - completely open audiocodec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173054 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2005-12-25 11:47 EST ------- * On the pedantic side: It is commonly considered bad taste to mention the software name in the Summary line. Keep the summary short and include relevant keywords. That's enough. More details fit into the package description. Probably also s/wavpack/WavPack/gi since that is how they spell it online. * pkgconfig template file wavpack.pc.in contains hardcoded libdir, which most likely breaks on multilib platforms if installed like that. Needs a patch which does libdir=@libdir@ instead of libdir=${prefix}/lib and provided that libdir will be defined and substituted by the used autotools framework. * pkgconfig file Cflags line is questionable. Adding a standard path for headers to the search list is dangerous. Also, are WavPack API users expected to do #include or #include ? In case of the latter, the pkgconfig file is wrong. Same for Libs line. -L${libdir} disturbes library location search list because libwavpack.so is installed into a standard location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 25 16:51:44 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 11:51:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174240] Review Request: artwiz-aleczapka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512251651.jBPGpidF029399@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: artwiz-aleczapka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174240 gajownik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |gajownik at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2005-12-25 11:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Ping? Uhm, sorry that it took me so long. I was ill a bit and after that I had a lot of duties. Sleeping 4-6 hours per day I was trying to catch up on my work. I thought that someone more knowledgeable could make a review in the meantime. (In reply to comment #2) > Hm, I think you we want the source files It depends. Some *-fonts packages use pregenerated fonts. Of course, it's nothing wrong in providing source files in src.rpm ;-] > I don't know weather it should also be run from %{_datadir}/fonts to allow for > integration... Without it fonts won't be visible in the system. In your fluxbox package you were adding these directories by modifying /etc/fonts/local.conf. Here you only need to run fc-cache in that dir because %{_datadir}/fonts is already in /etc/fonts/local.conf. > and point out diffs between FC{3,4,5}? In FC5 there is additional fonts.cache-2 file. (In reply to comment #3) > Ok here you go: added fc-cache to post and require it (so we don't need the if's > like in dejavu) That's wrong. Please take a look at these links: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165900#c1 http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-May/msg00887.html Here's the rest of review: - do not run fc-cache in %build section. It's a Bad Thing? ? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5176#c1 (Mike A. Harris is a maintainier of X.Org X11 in Fedora/RedHat) - do not include source files (*.bdf) in the final package - please preserve timestamps ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Timestamps (I changed "mv" command to "install -p" I prepared a small patch. I have cleaned up a bit %prep section and installed fonts into %{_datadir}/fonts/artwiz-aleczapka directory (not artwiz-aleczapka-fonts). I'm also not shure whether ?%{version}? part is necessary in %{buildroot}%{fontdir}/artwiz-aleczapka-{de,en,se}-%{version}. Oh, I also did not have time to struggle with documentation files. It needs some more work... BTW Merry Christmas :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 25 20:40:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:40:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173927] Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512252040.jBPKeXfr011962@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173927 ------- Additional Comments From gauret at free.fr 2005-12-25 15:40 EST ------- > I cant approve as this is assigned to someone else. All review requests are assigned to gdk bye default, just reassign it to yourself and approve it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 25 21:13:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:13:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173927] Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512252113.jBPLDnw1013730@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173927 ------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us 2005-12-25 16:13 EST ------- I cant reassign, bugzilla doesn't allow me to. the only option i have is to leave as new. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 25 21:34:04 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:34:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173927] Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512252134.jBPLY4mq015201@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: akode: Audio-decoding framewor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173927 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2005-12-25 16:33 EST ------- You need to request membership in the fedora-bugs group in the accounts system. That will give you the necessary capabilities in bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 25 22:17:04 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 17:17:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171624] Review Request: mimetic -- A full featured MIME library written in C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512252217.jBPMH465018440@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mimetic -- A full featured MIME library written in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171624 enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-25 17:16 EST ------- thx I contacted the developer and asked him to avoid the 'config.h' file but got no answer yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 04:50:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 23:50:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173683] Review Request: bidiv (BiDi Viewer) - display logical-Hebrew text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512260450.jBQ4obbe012874@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bidiv (BiDi Viewer) - display logical-Hebrew text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173683 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-25 23:50 EST ------- Needs work: * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake) * rpmlint of bidiv: The group is actually Applications/Text. And you can drop the Provides. * The package should contain the text of the license (wiki: PackageReviewGuidelines) * You can drop %doc from the man page, rpm knows about man Good: * Source bidiv-1.4.tgz is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 08:53:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 03:53:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173683] Review Request: bidiv (BiDi Viewer) - display logical-Hebrew text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512260853.jBQ8rZFM030677@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bidiv (BiDi Viewer) - display logical-Hebrew text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173683 ------- Additional Comments From danken at cs.technion.ac.il 2005-12-26 03:53 EST ------- I added smp_flags, corrected the group (even before your review...), dropped the Provides and %doc for the man page, and added the text of the GPL. However, there must be a smarter way to add that COPYING file, when it is missing from the upstream package - I added a new source with a tar.gz of the GPL. I lack the rpm expertease to do it properly, and I would appreciate a hint. Please see http://ivrix.org.il/redhat/bidiv-1.4-3.src.rpm and the updated spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 10:29:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 05:29:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176434] Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261029.jBQATR12006217@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176434 ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2005-12-26 05:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > That would make sense to me. Vaio only comes in i386, right? :-) I believe so. Or should I make it i686? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 10:48:50 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 05:48:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176434] Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261048.jBQAmo2E008585@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176434 ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2005-12-26 05:48 EST ------- Second try, adding an ExclusiveArch tag for i386 and i686: Spec Url: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/spicctrl.spec SRPM Url: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/spicctrl-1.9-1.2.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Dec 26 2005 Roozbeh Pournader 1.9-1.2 - Add ExclusiveArch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 11:01:05 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:01:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171526] Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261101.jBQB15Gk010308@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171526 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2005-12-26 06:00 EST ------- Now needs BuildRequires: autoconf since you run that after patching. rpmlint complains on source RPM: W: wine strange-permission wine.init 0755 can that file be 0644 instead? There are a lot of rpmlint complaints on the binary RPMs but most seem silly. Will look into them more at some point to be sure. Otherwise builds fine for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 11:02:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:02:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176434] Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261102.jBQB2fq3010534@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176434 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2005-12-26 06:02 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Second try, adding an ExclusiveArch tag for i386 and i686: This IMHO is wrong -- just use 'ExclusiveArch: i386'. Otherwise the buildsys probably will build the package for i386 and i686 without a reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 11:24:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:24:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 170504] Review Request: makebootfat - Utility for creation bootable FAT disk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261124.jBQBO8Gf013356@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: makebootfat - Utility for creation bootable FAT disk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=170504 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-26 06:24 EST ------- > Note that under 64 bit these will appear under /usr/lib64 Yep... I think it would be better to behave like grub package, i.e. place these x86-specific files under /usr/share/makebootfat/x86/* . IMHO it is more correct, because under /usr/lib we should place some HOST-specific internal binaries, but actually these two files are TARGET-specific... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 11:28:03 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:28:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174181] Review Request: python-simpy Python simulation framework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261128.jBQBS3bM013728@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-simpy Python simulation framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174181 sarantis at cnl.di.uoa.gr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From sarantis at cnl.di.uoa.gr 2005-12-26 06:27 EST ------- Imported to CVS, packages built for FC-3, FC-4 and devel. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 11:50:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 06:50:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173683] Review Request: bidiv (BiDi Viewer) - display logical-Hebrew text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261150.jBQBo0Iw015723@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bidiv (BiDi Viewer) - display logical-Hebrew text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173683 ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2005-12-26 06:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > bidiv is a tiny but useful unitility for viewing logical-Hebrew text from within an 8-bit terminal. 8-bit terminals? Do we still have those in Fedora? (In reply to comment #2) > However, there must be a smarter way to add that COPYING file, when it is > missing from the upstream package I believe you should contact the upstream author and ask him to mention the version of GPL he is releasing the package in. Nowhere in the package (including the C source) the version of the GPL is mentioned. The "no warranty" clause is not there either. This makes the package's license ambiguous. Please direct the author to the final section in the GPL, How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html#SEC4 Also, I would recommend: * Formatting the SPEC file according to the default Fedora format (as created by fedora-rpmnewspec); * Discarding the %{?dist} tag, as it is not used in the SPEC file for anything. I think the dist tag is only for cases when there are different Requires or BuildRequires for different disto releases (See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DistTag). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 12:22:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:22:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176434] Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261222.jBQCMSNe018285@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176434 ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2005-12-26 07:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > This IMHO is wrong -- just use 'ExclusiveArch: i386'. Otherwise the buildsys > probably will build the package for i386 and i686 without a reason. Grepping some FC4 spec files, it seems that some use a "%{ix86}" macro (acpid, ant, apmd, ccs, cman, compat-gcc-296, cpufreq-utils, ...), some use "i386" only (awesfx, compat-slang, cpuspeed, crash, devhelp, diskdumputils, ...) eclipse apparently has switched from "i386" to "%{ix86}" some time in May 2005: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/eclipse/FC-4/eclipse.spec?r1=1.126&r2=1.127 So apparently "i386 i686" is bad. I guess I should switch to "%{ix86}" because that is also what configure-thinkpad (from extras) uses. Third try, Spec Url: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/spicctrl.spec SRPM Url: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/spicctrl-1.9-1.3.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Dec 26 2005 Roozbeh Pournader 1.9-1.3 - Change ExclusiveArch to %%{ix86} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 12:48:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 07:48:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176434] Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261248.jBQCmPOn020408@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176434 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2005-12-26 07:48 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > This IMHO is wrong -- just use 'ExclusiveArch: i386'. Otherwise the buildsys > > probably will build the package for i386 and i686 without a reason. > Grepping some FC4 spec files, it seems that some use a "%{ix86}" macro (acpid, > ant, apmd, ccs, cman, compat-gcc-296, cpufreq-utils, ...), some use "i386" only > (awesfx, compat-slang, cpuspeed, crash, devhelp, diskdumputils, ...) Those are build with a different buildsys -- so only partly of interest here. > So apparently "i386 i686" is bad. I guess I should switch to "%{ix86}" because > that is also what configure-thinkpad (from extras) uses. configure-thinkpad was never build in plague. Technically you are correct with %{ix86} -- but as I said, plague will rebuild this for i386, i586, i686 (and maybe even athlon) IIRC (correct me if I'm wrong). There is no reason for that. So is still vote for: 'ExclusiveArch: i386' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 14:53:43 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:53:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176542] Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261453.jBQErhdx029646@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176542 ------- Additional Comments From toth_bandi at users.sourceforge.net 2005-12-26 09:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > your spec file is autogenerated. > look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines and edit your file by > hand. I modified gnome-yum.spec and create new src.rpm... Spec Name or Url: http://gnome-yum.sourceforge.net/download/gnome-yum.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://gnome-yum.sourceforge.net/download/gnome-yum-0.1.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 15:03:30 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 10:03:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173181] Review Request: buoh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261503.jBQF3Uh9030374@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buoh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173181 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2005-12-26 10:03 EST ------- Added gconf install and uninstall rules to post, postrun and prerun as per: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets Also removed the hard requires list. However i've not been able to repreduce the build error, here it installs cleanly to the correct RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/buoh and not .../usr/buoh, the "make install DESTDIR=RPM_BUILD_ROOT" should place them in the right location, using the %makeinstall macro, or adding datadir=RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share either makes it install on absolute locations (/usr/share, /usr/bin, etc) or use RPM_BUILD_ROOT/RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/buoh. Could you possibly try to build it again? Meantime i'll look into setting up a FC4 boot on this computer so i can reproduce the error; My current building is on a FC-devel box %changelog * Mon Dec 26 2005 - Chris Chabot - 0.8.1-2 - Added gconf uninstall rules on upgrade and uninstall - Commented out hard requirements, leaving them to rpm's autodep URLS: http://www.xs4all.nl/~chabotc/buoh.spec http://www.xs4all.nl/~chabotc/buoh-0.8.1-2.src.rpm Thanks for the feedback & reviewing! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From mihamina.rakotomandimby at etu.univ-orleans.fr Mon Dec 26 15:22:40 2005 From: mihamina.rakotomandimby at etu.univ-orleans.fr (Rakotomandimby Mihamina) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:22:40 +0100 Subject: generating zope.conf (zope 2.9) patch Message-ID: <1135610560.2420.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> Hi, I am packaging zope 2.9 (wich, at this time is in beta version) in order to have a ready RPM package when it's released as final stable. The sample configuration file is not the same anymore, and the patch for zope 2.8s is obsolete for 2.9. $ cd /source/directory $ mv Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in.original I edited Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in And generated the patch as folllow. $ diff -Naur Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in.original Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in --- Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in.original 2005-12-21 12:09:22.000000000 +0100 +++ Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in 2005-12-26 14:28:10.000000000 +0100 @@ -146,7 +146,8 @@ # # Example: # -# effective-user chrism + +effective-user <> # Directive: enable-product-installation @@ -510,7 +511,8 @@ # # Example: # -# security-policy-implementation python + +security-policy-implementation python # Directive: skip-authentication-checking ###################################################### ################ End of the patch #################### ###################################################### Then I save it under the SOURCES directory $ diff -Naur Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in.original \ Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in >\ /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/zope-2.9.0-config.patch $ rpmbuild -ba zope.spec [...] + echo 'Patch #0 (zope-2.9.0-config.patch):' Patch #0 (zope-2.9.0-config.patch): + patch -p1 -b --suffix .config -s The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in.original 2005-12-21 12:09:22.000000000 +0100 |+++ Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in 2005-12-26 14:28:10.000000000 +0100 -------------------------- File to patch: What did I do wrong? I attach the specfile. -- A powerfull GroupWare, CMS, CRM, ECM: CPS (Open Source & GPL). Opengroupware, SPIP, Plone, PhpBB, JetSpeed... are good: CPS is better. http://www.cps-project.org for downloads & documentation. Free hosting of CPS groupware: http://www.objectis.org. -------------- next part -------------- %define python_minver 2.4 %define zope_user zope %define zope_group %{zope_user} %define zope_home %{_libdir}/zope %define software_home %{zope_home}/lib/python %define instance_home %{_localstatedir}/lib/zope %define zopectl %{_bindir}/zopectl %define runzope %{_bindir}/runzope Name: zope Summary: Web application server for flexible content management applications Version: 2.9.0b1 Release: 1%{?dist} License: ZPL Group: System Environment/Daemons URL: http://www.zope.org/ Source0: Zope-2.9.0b1.tgz #Source10: http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/Hotfix-2005-04-05/Hotfix-20050405/Hotfix_20050405.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Source1: zope.init.in Source2: zope.sysconfig.in Source3: zope.zopectl.in Source4: zope-README.Fedora Source5: zope.logrotate.in Source6: zope.logrotate.cron.in Patch0: zope-2.9.0-config.patch # Patch1: zope-2.8.3-pythonwarning.patch BuildRequires: python-devel >= %{python_minver} BuildRequires: python >= %{python_minver} Requires: python >= %{python_minver} Requires(pre): /usr/sbin/useradd Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig Requires(preun): /sbin/chkconfig, /sbin/service %description Zope is an application server framework that enables developers to quickly build web applications such as intranets, portals, and content management systems. After starting Zope, you can access it by pointing your browser to http://localhost:8080 WARNING: this zope package has been built on python 2.4.X, which is not supported ! Do not file bugreports or ask for support on zope.org if you choose to use this package. %prep #%setup -q -n Zope-%{version}-final #-a 10 %setup -q -n Zope-%{version} #-a 10 %patch0 -p1 -b .config # remove the backup, or we'll install it too... rm -f skel/etc/zope.conf.in.config # Warning on the default index_html about python 2.4 & zope 2.8 # %patch1 -p1 -b .pythonwarning chmod -x Zope/skel/import/README.txt cp -p %{SOURCE4} README.Fedora cp -p %{SOURCE5} Zope/skel/etc/logrotate.conf.in %build ./configure \ --with-python=%{__python} \ --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{zope_home} \ # --optimize # --no-compile make %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT rm -f docs # Create all required additional directories for dir in %{zope_home} %{software_home} %{instance_home}/{Products,bin,var} \ %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig %{_bindir}; do mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT$dir done install -D -m 755 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/zope install -D -m 644 %{SOURCE2} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/zope install -D -m 755 %{SOURCE3} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/zopectl install -D -m 755 %{SOURCE6} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/cron.daily/zope-logrotate perl -pi -e 's,<>,%{_sysconfdir},g; s,<>,%{_bindir},g; s,<>,%{_localstatedir},g; s,<>,%{zope_user},g' \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/zope \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/zope \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/zopectl \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/cron.daily/zope-logrotate \ README.Fedora Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in # Install the skel, translating paths, into the build root %{__python} "Zope/utilities/copyzopeskel.py" \ --sourcedir="Zope/skel" \ --targetdir="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{instance_home}" \ --replace="INSTANCE_HOME:%{instance_home}" \ --replace="SOFTWARE_HOME:%{software_home}" \ --replace="ZOPE_HOME:%{zope_home}" \ --replace="PYTHON:%{__python}" \ # Actually copy all the other files over make install # Hotfix #cp -a Hotfix_20050405 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{zope_home}/lib/python/Products chmod 700 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{instance_home} chmod 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{zope_home} # Symlink to include in the docs ln -sf %{zope_home}/doc Zope/docs # write version.txt echo "Zope %{version}-%{release}" > \ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{zope_home}/lib/python/version.txt" # Compile .pyc %{__python} -c "import compileall; \ compileall.compile_dir(\"$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{zope_home}\", \ ddir=\"%{zope_home}\", force=1)" %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %pre /usr/sbin/useradd -c "Zope user" -s /bin/false -r -d %{zope_home} \ %{zope_user} 2>/dev/null || : %post # add zope init to runlevels /sbin/chkconfig --add zope %preun if [ $1 -eq 0 ]; then /sbin/service zope stop >/dev/null 2>&1 /sbin/chkconfig --del zope fi %files %defattr(-, root, root, -) # %doc %{zope_home}/doc %doc Zope/docs README.Fedora %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/zope %config %{_initrddir}/zope %config %{_sysconfdir}/cron.daily/zope-logrotate %attr(0755, root, root) %{_bindir}/zopectl %dir %{zope_home} %{zope_home}/bin # %{zope_home}/import %{zope_home}/lib %dir %{zope_home}/skel %{zope_home}/include %{zope_home}/zopeskel %{zope_home}/skel/bin %{zope_home}/skel/Extensions %{zope_home}/skel/import %{zope_home}/skel/log %{zope_home}/skel/Products %{zope_home}/skel/README.txt %{zope_home}/skel/var %config %{zope_home}/skel/etc %attr(-, %{zope_user}, %{zope_group}) %dir %{instance_home} %attr(-, %{zope_user}, %{zope_group}) %{instance_home}/bin %attr(-, %{zope_user}, %{zope_group}) %{instance_home}/Extensions %attr(-, %{zope_user}, %{zope_group}) %{instance_home}/import %attr(-, %{zope_user}, %{zope_group}) %{instance_home}/log %attr(-, %{zope_user}, %{zope_group}) %{instance_home}/Products %attr(-, %{zope_user}, %{zope_group}) %{instance_home}/README.txt %attr(-, %{zope_user}, %{zope_group}) %{instance_home}/var %attr(-, %{zope_user}, %{zope_group}) %config %{instance_home}/etc %changelog * Thu Nov 10 2005 Mihamina Rakotomandimby 2.8.4-1 - update to 2.8.4 * Tue Oct 25 2005 Aurelien Bompard 2.8.3-3 - rebuild * Tue Oct 25 2005 Aurelien Bompard 2.8.3-2 - add warning about zope 2.8 & python 2.4 (bug 171681) * Sat Oct 22 2005 Aurelien Bompard 2.8.3-1 - version 2.8.3 * Sat Oct 15 2005 Aurelien Bompard 2.8.2-1 - version 2.8.2 * Sat Sep 10 2005 Aurelien Bompard 2.8.1-1 - version 2.8.1 * Sun Jun 12 2005 Aurelien Bompard 2.8.0-2 - rebuild * Sat Jun 11 2005 Aurelien Bompard 2.8.0-1 - version 2.8.0 * Sun Jun 05 2005 Aurelien Bompard 2.7.6-2 - don't remove the zope user un postun (to keep the Data.fs to the correct owner after removal) * Sun May 08 2005 Aurelien Bompard 2.7.6-1%{?dist} - version 2.7.6 - use disttag * Thu Apr 07 2005 Aurelien Bompard 2.7.5-2.fc4 - add hotfix * Thu Mar 24 2005 Aurelien Bompard 2.7.5-1.fc4 - version 2.7.5 - drop Epoch - change release tag for FC4 - convert some tabs into spaces * Wed Jan 26 2005 Aurelien Bompard 2.7.4-1 - version 2.7.4 - flag the documentation as %%doc - make %%zope_home go+rx to allow users to create instances and to allow access to docs - add a logrotate cron job - flag config files as %%config even in %%zope_home and %%instance_home * Fri Dec 10 2004 Aurelien Bompard 2.7.3-0.fdr.6 - activate "security-policy-implementation python" in zope.conf * Sun Nov 21 2004 Aurelien Bompard 2.7.3-0.fdr.5 - revert to zope's default directory tree to allow multiple instances - make the zopectl script multiple-instaces-aware. - add README.Fedora * Fri Nov 12 2004 Aurelien Bompard 2.7.3-0.fdr.4 - compile scripts in %zope_home/bin too - keep skel dir in %zope_home to fix mkzopeinstance - BuildRequire python, since python-devel doesn't require it. * Fri Nov 12 2004 Aurelien Bompard 2.7.3-0.fdr.3 - compile .pyc instead of just touch-ing them * Thu Nov 11 2004 Aurelien Bompard 2.7.3-0.fdr.2 - deal with leftover .pyc files - minor spec cleanups * Thu Nov 11 2004 Aurelien Bompard 2.7.3-0.fdr.1 - fix scriptlets requirements - use standard buildroot - replace %%buildroot by RPM_BUILD_ROOT - update to 2.7.3 - drop Hotfix - drop patch 1, fixed upstream * Tue Aug 10 2004 Aurelien Bompard 2.7.2-0.fdr.3 - add hotfix from Zope.org: http://zope.org/Products/Zope/Hotfix-200400807/Hotfix-20040807-alert * Wed Aug 04 2004 Aurelien Bompard 2.7.2-0.fdr.2 - add patch to warn the user that the initial user cannot be added while Zope is running (from Chris McDonough) * Wed Aug 04 2004 Aurelien Bompard 2.7.2-0.fdr.1 - version 2.7.2 - remove leftover byte-compilation in %%post - Zope 2.7.x really requires python >= 2.3.3 * Wed Jul 14 2004 Rex Dieter 2.7.1-0.fdr.1 - 2.7.1 - move files created in %%post back into rpm. Unowned files are bad. - make (theoretically) buildable for all rh73-rh90,fc1/2,el3 NOTE: lowerred python_minver to 2.2.2 to test builds, though (most) docs claim 2.3.3 is required. (??) - don't use Requires(preun,postun) - use %%_smp_mflags * Tue Apr 28 2004 Chris McDonough 2.7.0-0.fdr.1 - Prep for submission to Fedora.us by revising work done by Matthias - Refer to source files by URL instead of by name - Write version.txt into software home in post - Don't ship byte-compiled files, instead compile them in post - Add patch for inverted P_WAIT/P_NOWAIT in zdctl (fixes startup) - Add patch for objectmanager bug that could effect sites that depend on userid/username separation - Improved init script (OK and FAILED now are printed at the appropriate times) - Remove runzope workaround by adding a stanza to the config file. - Start in runlevels 345. - Known issues: - zopectl is started and runs as the root user at boot time, (although Zope itself runs as the zope user) - no distro-specific docs telling people which port the software runs on or how to add a user via zopectl adduser. * Wed Feb 18 2004 Matthias Saou 2.7.0-0.6.fr - Initial RPM release. - The startup/stop needs to be modified further. - Currently "zopectl" returns an error although Zope does start... From stickster at gmail.com Mon Dec 26 15:47:16 2005 From: stickster at gmail.com (Paul W. Frields) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 10:47:16 -0500 Subject: Drivel Message-ID: <1135612037.17927.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> I had an email exchange with Jeremy Katz, and given how he has plenty of other work to do, he is giving over ownership of drivel in FE to me. I will shortly update it to 2.0.2. Refresh my memory please: If I change the entry in owners.list, does that automatically trigger a change in the default bug ownership in Bugzilla, or do I need to drop someone an email? -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 15:54:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 10:54:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261554.jBQFsPp1002370@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 jeff at ultimateevil.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jeff at ultimateevil.org ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ultimateevil.org 2005-12-26 10:54 EST ------- This isn't a full review, I'm just noting some things to clean up in the spec. First of all, the %description is huge. I personally feel it should be one or two paragraphs. I don't think that's a blocker. The Summary tag shouldn't contain the package name. Just make it "An application to..." You should get rid of the %define dist at the top. If you want a %dist tag in your personal repository, add it to your .rpmmacros file. Version: %{version} and %Release: %{release}.%{dist} are not defined, and probably not handled very well (as in the build system will probably choke). Just use real relase numbers and such, like 2.1 and 31%{?dist}. The Source should be the full URL where the source can be downloaded. The Vendor tag is deprecated. Please remove it. The BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -- see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines. The Requires: clamav is probably not necessary. The RPM packaging process will discover this if the package is really linked against clamav. Is the Requires: httpd absolutely necessary? I understand that users won't have access to the quarantine function without it, but will the program run without a web server? If so, you shouldn't require httpd, but leave a note in a README file somewhere. In the %files section, %defattr should be "(-,root,root,-)" -- note final dash. This preserves the mode of directories as well. What is your macro ${prefix} set to? Is it /usr? (As an aside, don't use this macro like you have done, for one it's not defined in your spec file, and second it is better to use the macro %{_prefix} which the RPM subsystem already has defined. Also, a local administrator can change it to suit non-conformist freakish desires.) If it is /usr, your package winds up owning it, which conflicts with the filesystem package. A better example would be something like the following: %{_bindir}/* %{_sbindir}/* %{_datadir}/%{name}/ %{_libdir}/%{name}/ and so on, which will include all files under /usr/bin and /usr/sbin, and the entire directories of /usr/share/clement and /usr/lib/clement including all files therein. It is my adamant opinion that no files in /usr should ever need to be written directly by the administrator or any other user. You have a config file listed in %{prefix}/conf (again, %{prefix} is not defined). All config files should be under /etc. Use the %{_sysconfdir} macro for /etc. Personally, I prefer packages to place their config files in %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}. The attr() on /etc/sysconfig/clement is probably not necessary, if it was installed with the appropriate permissions (defattr should be right). Why should it be writable by the mail user? It is readable by all users, so root owning it should be sufficient and more secure. Also, as above, attr() on /etc/init.d/clement (should be %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d/clement) is superfluous if it is installed correctly. I really think %files as a whole should come after %prep, %build, %install, and %pre/post/preun/postun. I'm not sure if that's a hard and fast rule, though. If you are going to run chkconfig in %post and %preun, then you need to Requires(post) and Requires(preun): chkconfig. You should not let chkconfig make the program start automatically in %post. Just chkconfig --add it. It will be set to K**clement in every runlevel. Let the administrator turn it on. Also, get rid of the chkconfig --list line. I'm not sure what those %{prefix}/support/add*.sh scripts to, but I assume they help build the default config file. That's nice, but I don't think you should do that in %post. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think it would be better to include a script and maybe put it in /usr/share/clement (%{_datadir}/%{name}) with a note in the default config file saying "please run /usr/share/clement/*.sh to get a nice baseline config." In %preun, I would change the path /etc/init.d to %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d. Also, Requires(preun): initscripts, because you require the service command. And if you followed what I was saying above about paths and such, that whole ( cd %{prefix} ... line at the end needs to go. You can use make and rm instead of %{__make} and %{__rm}. That's up to you. I think it's cleaner with the commands instead of the macros. I'm not sure what that mkcron.sh script does exactly, but you might want anacron scripts to just go into /etc/cron.daily. Finally, I don't recall seeing your name or email address on the fedora-extras-list before. If you are a new contributor, you need to identify yourself as such so someone who can sponsor you will help you out. I'm not a sponsor. In spite of my ripping your spec file to shreds (it happens to us all our first time), I want to say "thank you" for writing this program. As an administrator of several email servers and domains, I always appreciate people who help fight spam. I personally had plans to spend my time on something else last week, but I wound up working almost all week on one particular spam problem instead, it was litterally turning into a DoS attack. So thanks for fighting the good fight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From katzj at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 16:00:19 2005 From: katzj at redhat.com (Jeremy Katz) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:00:19 -0500 Subject: Drivel In-Reply-To: <1135612037.17927.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1135612037.17927.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <1135612819.2752.20.camel@bree.local.net> On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 10:47 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > I had an email exchange with Jeremy Katz, and given how he has plenty of > other work to do, he is giving over ownership of drivel in FE to me. I > will shortly update it to 2.0.2. Refresh my memory please: If I change > the entry in owners.list, does that automatically trigger a change in > the default bug ownership in Bugzilla, or do I need to drop someone an > email? It will happen automatically -- there's a cron job which runs and checks out the file to set the owner. Jeremy From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 15:58:06 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 10:58:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176542] Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261558.jBQFw6bJ002807@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176542 pmatilai at laiskiainen.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pmatilai at laiskiainen.org ------- Additional Comments From pmatilai at laiskiainen.org 2005-12-26 10:57 EST ------- This is not a full review but a couple of comments: - The consolehelper symlinks don't belong to %post/%postun scriptlets, package them along with other content in %install - You should add dependency on usermode(-gtk) for the above - GConf2, vte, gnome-vfs2 dependencies are probably automatically detected by rpmbuild, if so they should be removed as redundant - Requires: rpm is silly - you must have rpm installed to install an rpm anyway - Adding 3rd party repositories containing known legally problematic packages is not allowed, the fedora-repositories subpackage and any references to those repositories needs to be removed. - The for-loop for copying the docs is redundant, just use %doc ABOUT-NLS AUTHORS README... in %files section - I'd suggest using %find_lang macro instead of the current {_datadir}/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/gnome-yum.mo in %files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 16:31:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:31:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176542] Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261631.jBQGVQDK004779@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176542 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-26 11:31 EST ------- > - Requires: rpm is silly - you must have rpm installed to install an rpm anyway not necessarily; chroot installations do not need rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 16:46:04 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:46:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176373] Review Request: ytalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261646.jBQGk48H005688@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ytalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176373 jeff at ultimateevil.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jeff at ultimateevil.org ------- Additional Comments From jeff at ultimateevil.org 2005-12-26 11:46 EST ------- Doh! You beat me to this one. I was going to contribute ytalk. Oh well. I snooze I lose. One thing, though. As of 3.3.0, ytalk no longer supports X. The developer's site says "at the request of many users." I'd sure like to know what is wrong with those users because in my opinion, the X support was the most important feature of ytalk. Now it's all but useless to me. :( So, as I was saying, I had plans to package ytalk, but didn't get to it in time. I was considering version 3.2.0 since it still supports X. Would you consider packaging that release instead, to include X support? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 17:00:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:00:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175168] Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261700.jBQH0Ckr006517@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gideon - GUI designer for GTK/C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175168 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |bugs.michael at gmx.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2005-12-26 11:59 EST ------- * no desktop menu entry included, although this is a GUI program * menu "New Window" gives error message: Information 'New Window' action failed: Failed to execute child process 'gideon' (No such file or directory) spawn_async(/home/qa, gideon) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 17:16:19 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 12:16:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175426] Review Request: tkcon - Tcl console shell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261716.jBQHGJY6007462@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkcon - Tcl console shell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175426 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: tkcon - Tcl |Review Request: tkcon - Tcl |console shell |console shell Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |dmitry at butskoy.name OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-26 12:16 EST ------- - IMO Group should be "Development/Tools" - Description can sound more clean (see tha patch) - %docs: all docs/*.txt are unneeded, include some files from the root dir, especially index.html (which refers to docs/ subdir, therefore we should preserve this layout). - strip '\r' from the eol in release.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From jeff at ultimateevil.org Mon Dec 26 17:40:28 2005 From: jeff at ultimateevil.org (Jeff Carlson) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 09:40:28 -0800 Subject: Failed update build in devel branch Message-ID: <43B02B0C.6090603@ultimateevil.org> Hi, This morning I finally tried to update up-imapproxy in devel. It builds against OpenSSL, which is 0.9.8a in devel, and needs a rebuild in order to link properly. This sounds simple enough. It failed on i386. It really looked like it succeeded on x86_64, but there are no packages there. And it was canceled on ppc. (Does a failure in one of the arches automatically force a cancel in the others?) I saved the build log. I put it up on my server at http://www.ultimateevil.org/~jeff/Fedora/2243-up-imapproxy-1.2.4-5.fc5-i386-build.log I don't run rawhide and I'm not much of a C programmer, so I'm not sure how I can fix this. Perhaps upstream needs to know there are changes needed to support OpenSSL 0.9.8a. Or is there an openssl097-compat package in rawhide now? If so, do I just change the BR to that? How do I find a list of what packages are currently available in rawhide if I'm not running it? If someone running rawhide wants to pull my spec out of CVS and give this a shot, I'd appreciate it. Thanks, Jeff From nman64 at n-man.com Mon Dec 26 17:53:31 2005 From: nman64 at n-man.com (Patrick Barnes) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:53:31 -0600 Subject: generating zope.conf (zope 2.9) patch In-Reply-To: <1135610560.2420.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1135610560.2420.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <43B02E1B.3040805@n-man.com> Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: > Hi, > I am packaging zope 2.9 (wich, at this time is in beta version) in order > to have a ready RPM package when it's released as final stable. > > The sample configuration file is not the same anymore, and the patch for > zope 2.8s is obsolete for 2.9. > > > $ cd /source/directory > $ mv Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in.original > > I edited Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in > And generated the patch as folllow. > > $ diff -Naur Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in.original > > Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in > --- Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in.original 2005-12-21 12:09:22.000000000 > +0100 > +++ Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in 2005-12-26 14:28:10.000000000 +0100 > @@ -146,7 +146,8 @@ > # > # Example: > # > -# effective-user chrism > + > +effective-user <> > > > # Directive: enable-product-installation > @@ -510,7 +511,8 @@ > # > # Example: > # > -# security-policy-implementation python > + > +security-policy-implementation python > > # Directive: skip-authentication-checking > > ###################################################### > ################ End of the patch #################### > ###################################################### > > Then I save it under the SOURCES directory > > $ diff -Naur Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in.original \ > Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in >\ > /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/zope-2.9.0-config.patch > > $ rpmbuild -ba zope.spec > [...] > + echo 'Patch #0 (zope-2.9.0-config.patch):' > Patch #0 (zope-2.9.0-config.patch): > + patch -p1 -b --suffix .config -s > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |--- Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in.original 2005-12-21 > 12:09:22.000000000 +0100 > |+++ Zope/skel/etc/zope.conf.in 2005-12-26 14:28:10.000000000 +0100 > -------------------------- > File to patch: > > > What did I do wrong? > I attach the specfile. > > At a glance, it looks like the problem is in your .spec. Try changing '%patch0 -p1 -b .config' to '%patch0 -p0 -b .config'. Use 'man patch' for details on the -p flag. -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64 at n-man.com http://www.n-man.com/ -- Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance! http://rate.affero.net/nman64/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From buc at odusz.so-cdu.ru Mon Dec 26 18:08:10 2005 From: buc at odusz.so-cdu.ru (Dmitry Butskoy) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:08:10 +0300 Subject: owners owners.list,1.459,1.460 In-Reply-To: <1135519540.2888.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200512170504.jBH54AdA012188@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> <20051224201046.08ec12ad.bugs.michael@gmx.net> <1135463382.2832.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43AE3880.2040607@redhat.com> <1135519540.2888.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <43B0318A.4070109@odu.neva.ru> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >I'd like to add one thing to your thinking -- some of his reviews simply >had a >---- >Congragulations, your src.rpm has succesfully passed the test including >rpmlint >with built rpm and mock. > >The spec file fully complies with Packaging Guidelines >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines. > >It is the honor to get [...] package status as FE-ACCEPTED >---- >or similar statements. Some other people do it like this, too. I would >feel much more comfortable if we would have a statement like the >following in the Review Guidelines: > >"The Reviewer in the bugreport has to explicit list all the important >things he checked when approving a package." > > and the "similar statements" above just will contain more words... BTW, I prefer to avoid this "list of all checked things", considering it as a bugzilla spam. Only remarks/suggestions/nitpicks should be present in the bugzilla ticket. The silence means OK (notwithstanding that it can be not OK). Anyway, the requirement for skilled reviewer to manually write something about each review item is too hard. The reviewer should focus on the package, but not on the bureaucracy... Dmitry Butskoy From katzj at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 18:14:49 2005 From: katzj at redhat.com (Jeremy Katz) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:14:49 -0500 Subject: Failed update build in devel branch In-Reply-To: <43B02B0C.6090603@ultimateevil.org> References: <43B02B0C.6090603@ultimateevil.org> Message-ID: <1135620889.2752.24.camel@bree.local.net> On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 09:40 -0800, Jeff Carlson wrote: > This morning I finally tried to update up-imapproxy in devel. It builds > against OpenSSL, which is 0.9.8a in devel, and needs a rebuild in order > to link properly. > > This sounds simple enough. > > It failed on i386. It really looked like it succeeded on x86_64, but > there are no packages there. And it was canceled on ppc. (Does a > failure in one of the arches automatically force a cancel in the others?) Yes, a failure on one arch fails all arches. The reasoning being that the build will not be released unless it succeeds on all arches and continuing at that point is just a waste of builder resources. > I saved the build log. I put it up on my server at > http://www.ultimateevil.org/~jeff/Fedora/2243-up-imapproxy-1.2.4-5.fc5-i386-build.log > > I don't run rawhide and I'm not much of a C programmer, so I'm not sure > how I can fix this. Perhaps upstream needs to know there are changes > needed to support OpenSSL 0.9.8a. It looks like openssl just changed their headers a little, the following gets it building for me diff -ur up-imapproxy-1.2.4/src/imapcommon.c up-imapproxy/src/imapcommon.c --- up-imapproxy-1.2.4/src/imapcommon.c 2005-08-31 12:32:24.000000000 -0400 +++ up-imapproxy/src/imapcommon.c 2005-12-26 13:12:10.000000000 -0500 @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ #include #include +#include #include #include Jeremy From stickster at gmail.com Mon Dec 26 18:20:35 2005 From: stickster at gmail.com (Paul W. Frields) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:20:35 -0500 Subject: Failed update build in devel branch In-Reply-To: <43B02B0C.6090603@ultimateevil.org> References: <43B02B0C.6090603@ultimateevil.org> Message-ID: <1135621235.17927.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 09:40 -0800, Jeff Carlson wrote: > Hi, > > This morning I finally tried to update up-imapproxy in devel. It builds > against OpenSSL, which is 0.9.8a in devel, and needs a rebuild in order > to link properly. > > This sounds simple enough. > > It failed on i386. It really looked like it succeeded on x86_64, but > there are no packages there. And it was canceled on ppc. (Does a > failure in one of the arches automatically force a cancel in the others?) > > I saved the build log. I put it up on my server at > http://www.ultimateevil.org/~jeff/Fedora/2243-up-imapproxy-1.2.4-5.fc5-i386-build.log > > I don't run rawhide and I'm not much of a C programmer, so I'm not sure > how I can fix this. Perhaps upstream needs to know there are changes > needed to support OpenSSL 0.9.8a. > > Or is there an openssl097-compat package in rawhide now? If so, do I > just change the BR to that? How do I find a list of what packages are > currently available in rawhide if I'm not running it? > > If someone running rawhide wants to pull my spec out of CVS and give > this a shot, I'd appreciate it. I made the attached patch and built the package successfully with mock. I admit I'm not much of a C programmer either -- and by "admit" I mean "trumpet" ;-D -- but the way I figured this out was as follows, in case it helps you get a leg up. This will all be trivial to all the folks around here who program in their sleep, so I apologize for boring them. 1. The error messages say that gcc doesn't know anything about MD5_DIGEST_LENGTH, which is probably a constant expected to be declared in some included .h file somewhere. I did a grep in the package source, so I figured it must be in a system-wide include somewhere. I decided to start by looking at openssl. 2. I downloaded the rawhide version of openssl, opened the package with rpm2cpio and grep'd in the /usr/include stuff, and found it in /usr/include/openssl/md5.h. 3. That header is not included anywhere in any of the .c or .h files. So I added this as an #include in imapcommon.c and generated the patch. (I don't know if this is the best place for it, but it at least seemed non-ugly.) After changing the .spec file, mock built it OK! -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 403 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From stickster at gmail.com Mon Dec 26 18:22:15 2005 From: stickster at gmail.com (Paul W. Frields) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:22:15 -0500 Subject: Failed update build in devel branch In-Reply-To: <1135620889.2752.24.camel@bree.local.net> References: <43B02B0C.6090603@ultimateevil.org> <1135620889.2752.24.camel@bree.local.net> Message-ID: <1135621336.17927.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 13:14 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 09:40 -0800, Jeff Carlson wrote: > > I saved the build log. I put it up on my server at > > http://www.ultimateevil.org/~jeff/Fedora/2243-up-imapproxy-1.2.4-5.fc5-i386-build.log > > > > I don't run rawhide and I'm not much of a C programmer, so I'm not sure > > how I can fix this. Perhaps upstream needs to know there are changes > > needed to support OpenSSL 0.9.8a. > > It looks like openssl just changed their headers a little, the following > gets it building for me > > diff -ur up-imapproxy-1.2.4/src/imapcommon.c up-imapproxy/src/imapcommon.c > --- up-imapproxy-1.2.4/src/imapcommon.c 2005-08-31 12:32:24.000000000 -0400 > +++ up-imapproxy/src/imapcommon.c 2005-12-26 13:12:10.000000000 -0500 > @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ > > #include > #include > +#include > > #include > #include > > > Jeremy Cool, now I know I did the right thing too! :-) -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 18:36:30 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:36:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176542] Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261836.jBQIaU09013519@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176542 ------- Additional Comments From toth_bandi at users.sourceforge.net 2005-12-26 13:36 EST ------- - Okay. I remove all repositories from source package and I insert %find_lang macro to the spec file. - I can't solve the consolehelper symlinks with your solving and I don't modify this problem in the end. (error message: RPM build errors: Symlink points to BuildRoot: /usr/bin/gnome-yum => /var/tmp/gnome-yum-0.1.2-3-root-root/usr/bin/consolehelper) Here is the next release: Spec Name or Url: http://gnome-yum.sourceforge.net/download/gnome-yum.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://gnome-yum.sourceforge.net/download/gnome-yum-0.1.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 18:50:57 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 13:50:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176434] Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261850.jBQIoviN014410@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176434 ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2005-12-26 13:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > configure-thinkpad was never build in plague. > > Technically you are correct with %{ix86} -- but as I said, plague will rebuild > this for i386, i586, i686 (and maybe even athlon) IIRC (correct me if I'm > wrong). There is no reason for that. So is still vote for: 'ExclusiveArch: i386' I guess you're wrong. Grepping Extras packages from 'development', the following use "%{ix86}", but I can see no i586 or i686 RPM in the built RPMs: athcool.spec:ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} atitvout.spec:ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} camstream.spec:ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 Glide3.spec:ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} alpha ia64 x86_64 jogl.spec:ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} ppc ... Checking dates, athcool, for example, appears to be last rebuilt on 2005-12-03, when the plague system was in place: 1538: athcool (athcool-0_3_11-3_fc5) gajownik at gmail.com needsign/success hammer2.fedora.redhat.com(i386): 3150b8e1da473c5338699cf8f9cb31cd1d85262d done/done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 19:00:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:00:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176542] Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261900.jBQJ0NTK015136@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176542 ------- Additional Comments From stickster at gmail.com 2005-12-26 14:00 EST ------- The URL for your spec is pointing to an old version, could you update it please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 19:20:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 14:20:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176542] Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512261920.jBQJKcOp016239@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176542 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-26 14:20 EST ------- - Missing BR: gtkhtml2-devel (In reply to comment #3) > - Requires: rpm is silly - you must have rpm installed to install an rpm anyway Strictly speaking you need to have rpm-libs and a front-end. What's interesting is that I don't see any path from gnome-yum to rpm-libs. Am I missing something obvious? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 20:26:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:26:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176434] Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512262026.jBQKQRTE020675@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: spicctrl: Sony Vaio laptop SPIC control program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176434 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at leemhuis.info 2005-12-26 15:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I guess you're wrong. According to your data: yes. But I tried with your latest package in a local plague-server and it build the package for i386 and i686... /me is even more confused now. But it's seems not that important... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 20:54:49 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 15:54:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173181] Review Request: buoh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512262054.jBQKsnkp021937@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buoh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173181 ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2005-12-26 15:54 EST ------- Installed FC4 in a Xen guest domain (was planning to play with anyhow :-)) and build the latest buoh release, worked flawlessly! sh-3.00# rpm -qpl /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/buoh-0.8.1-2.i386.rpm /etc/gconf/schemas/buoh.schemas /usr/bin/buoh /usr/share/applications/buoh.desktop /usr/share/buoh /usr/share/buoh/comics /usr/share/buoh/comics/comics.xml /usr/share/buoh/pixmaps/buoh16x16.png /usr/share/buoh/pixmaps/buoh64x64.png /usr/share/buoh/ui /usr/share/buoh/ui/buoh-ui.xml /usr/share/doc/buoh-0.8.1 /usr/share/doc/buoh-0.8.1/AUTHORS /usr/share/doc/buoh-0.8.1/COPYING /usr/share/doc/buoh-0.8.1/INSTALL /usr/share/doc/buoh-0.8.1/NEWS /usr/share/doc/buoh-0.8.1/README /usr/share/doc/buoh-0.8.1/TODO sh-3.00# rpm -q fedora-release fedora-release-4-2 So to verity it was not a root user build vs user account build problem i've also setup a user build envirioment and tested, with same result: [chabotc at cch-laptop ~]$ cat .rpmmacros %_topdir /home/chabotc [chabotc at cch-laptop ~]$ rpm -qpl RPMS/i386/buoh-0.8.1-2.i386.rpm /etc/gconf/schemas/buoh.schemas /usr/bin/buoh /usr/share/applications/buoh.desktop /usr/share/buoh /usr/share/buoh/comics /usr/share/buoh/comics/comics.xml /usr/share/buoh/pixmaps/buoh16x16.png /usr/share/buoh/pixmaps/buoh64x64.png /usr/share/buoh/ui /usr/share/buoh/ui/buoh-ui.xml /usr/share/doc/buoh-0.8.1 /usr/share/doc/buoh-0.8.1/AUTHORS /usr/share/doc/buoh-0.8.1/COPYING /usr/share/doc/buoh-0.8.1/INSTALL /usr/share/doc/buoh-0.8.1/NEWS /usr/share/doc/buoh-0.8.1/README /usr/share/doc/buoh-0.8.1/TODO So as far as i've been able to verify, it builds cleanly on FC4 now too -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 26 21:11:03 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 16:11:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174265] Review Request: itcl - Object oriented extension to Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512262111.jBQLB3gu022684@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itcl - Object oriented extension to Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174265 jpmahowald at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-26 16:10 EST ------- * Why not package the itk extensions seperately? tcl and tk are seperate. * Source 0 is not available (http://sourceforge.net/project/incrtcl/itcl3.2.1_src.tgz) (wiki: QAChecklist item 2) It seems the only way to enable automated sourceforge downloads is to hard code a mirror. * 3.3 seems to have been released. * Some compiler warnings, mostly about pointers, that you may want to inform upstream about. * To clarify, the large patch included is to update configure, respect DESTDIR, look in lib64, etc.? May go upstream, possibly saving 100KB from the srpm! Good: * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint happy, except for no docs for -devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 00:10:45 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:10:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176579] New: Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176579 Summary: Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://ensc.de/fedora/ipsvd.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://ensc.de/fedora/ipsvd-0.11.1-0.4.src.rpm GNU Arch: ensc at ensc.de--fedora (http://ensc.de/tla/{archives}/fedora) ipsvd--review--0 Description: ipsvd is a set of internet protocol service daemons for Unix. It currently includes a TCP/IP service daemon, and a UDP/IP service daemon. It provides a similar functionality like D. J. Bernstein's ucspi-tcp tools. An internet protocol service (ipsv) daemon waits for incoming connections on a local socket; for new connections, it conditionally runs an arbitrary program with standard input reading from the socket, and standard output writing to the socket (if connected), to handle the connection. Standard error is used for logging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 00:32:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:32:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176580] New: Review Request: x11-ssh-askpass -- the cool brother of gnome-ssh-askpass Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176580 Summary: Review Request: x11-ssh-askpass -- the cool brother of gnome-ssh-askpass Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://ensc.de/fedora/x11-ssh-askpass.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://ensc.de/fedora/x11-ssh-askpass-1.2.4.1-0.src.rpm GNU Arch: ensc at ensc.de--fedora (http://ensc.de/tla/{archives}/fedora) x11-ssh-askpass--review--0 Description: x11-ssh-askpass is a lightweight passphrase dialog for OpenSSH or other open variants of SSH. In particular, x11-ssh-askpass is useful with the Unix port of OpenSSH by Damien Miller and others, and Damien includes it in his RPM packages of OpenSSH. x11-ssh-askpass uses only the stock X11 libraries (libX11, libXt) for its user interface. This reduces its dependencies on external libraries (such as GNOME or Perl/Tk). See the README for further information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 00:44:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:44:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176581] New: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://ensc.de/fedora/fnord.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://ensc.de/fedora/fnord-1.10-0.1.src.rpm GNU Arch: ensc at ensc.de--fedora (http://ensc.de/tla/{archives}/fedora) fnord--review--0 Description: fnord is a small and fast webserver with CGI-capability and has been written by Felix von Leitner. fnord supports virtual hosting und runs under tcpserver/ipsvd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 01:33:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 20:33:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176582] New: Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176582 Summary: Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://ensc.de/fedora/freedt.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://ensc.de/fedora/freedt-0.21-1.src.rpm GNU Arch: ensc at ensc.de--fedora (http://ensc.de/tla/{archives}/fedora) freedt--review--0 Description: freedt is a reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL, sharing no code with the original implementation. It currently includes feature-equivalent replacements for argv0, envdir, envuidgid, setlock, setuidgid, softlimit, supervise, svc, svok, svscan, svstat and recordio. It also includes dumblog (a simple multilog replacement), mkservice (a script for automatically creating service directories), anonidentd (an anonymising identd implementation) and ratelimit (a bandwidth-limiting filter along the lines of recordio). All the tools include usage messages; for instance, do "ratelimit -h" for a brief rundown of the options. Please note that this package is not a drop-in replacement for daemontools; the internal state files in service directories are different, and the error messages (and a few of the options) aren't quite the same. While it's stable enough that the author (and several other people) are using it, it's also still somewhat experimental, so the author recommends sticking with daemontools on production systems until a stable release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 02:10:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:10:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176205] Review Request: GZLauncher In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512270210.jBR2AfFd009521@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GZLauncher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176205 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-26 21:10 EST ------- Still a couple minor things to fix. Change Source1 to merely gzlauncher.desktop, by default rpm looks in the sources dir. %{_datadir}/gzlauncher/* does not own the directory %{_datadir}/gzlauncher/ itself. %{_datadir}/gzlauncher/ will own the directory itself. Segfault bug submitted. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=667062&aid=1390964&group_id=114060 - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on FC4 - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 02:12:32 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:12:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176373] Review Request: ytalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512270212.jBR2CW6S009645@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ytalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176373 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2005-12-26 21:12 EST ------- I thought it was odd too that users requested the support to be removed. Normally I'd think users would simply not use a feature they didn't want. My main concern with using 3.2.0 is that if the upstream has further releases (security or otherwise) it will become more and more difficult to support the package. It's also possible there is another maintainer of ytalk (it seems to have jumped around quite a bit) If we could find another maintainer that actively maintains ytalk and still supports X I'd be happy to use them as an upstream instead of www.impul.se -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 02:48:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:48:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172343] Review Request: libtomoe-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512270248.jBR2m8oP011603@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtomoe-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172343 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-26 21:48 EST ------- Builds in mock now, FC4 i386. Needs work: * No downloadable source. Please give the full URL in the Source tag. * rpmlint of libtomoe-gtk-devel: Limit description lines to 80 characters. * Missing ldconfig scriptlet at %post and %postun. wiki: ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 03:43:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:43:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512270343.jBR3hb4Y018031@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-26 22:43 EST ------- * Tue Dec 27 2005 Enrico Scholz - 1.10-0.7 - added initng initscripts - do not make the 'fnord' user a member of the 'www' group because this group does not exist in a minimal installation - added /srv/www/fnord directory - apply -setgid patch http://ensc.de/fedora/fnord.spec http://ensc.de/fedora/fnord-1.10-0.7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 05:43:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:43:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168719] Review Request: gdal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512270543.jBR5hf43028337@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gdal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=168719 ivazquez at ivazquez.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |ivazquez at ivazquez.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-27 00:43 EST ------- - Drop static libs and .la files everywhere - Consider including pymod/samples in -python %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 06:08:19 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:08:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173295] Review Request: python-4Suite-XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512270608.jBR68JvH030579@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-4Suite-XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173295 ivazquez at ivazquez.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |ivazquez at ivazquez.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-27 01:08 EST ------- - Missing Requires: python-abi = %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print sys.version[:3]") - Doesn't contain any provision for .pyo files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 06:30:04 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:30:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173295] Review Request: python-4Suite-XML In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512270630.jBR6U4Cn031690@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-4Suite-XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173295 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-27 01:29 EST ------- - Hardcoded paths instead of macros (%{_datadir}, %{_libdir}) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 06:35:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:35:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175201] Review Request: python-cheetah In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512270635.jBR6ZTQa031972@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-cheetah https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175201 ivazquez at ivazquez.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |ivazquez at ivazquez.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-27 01:35 EST ------- - Lots of complaints about "non-executable-script" due to shebang lines in .py files; very minor problem (and one that should be fixed upstream). The rest looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 06:48:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:48:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175844] Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512270648.jBR6mcZX032715@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175844 ivazquez at ivazquez.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |ivazquez at ivazquez.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-27 01:48 EST ------- - Patches shouldn't use macros in their naming - The default for %setup -n already is %{name}-%{version} - Use install -p for %{SOURCE2} instead of cp - The summary's first letter should be capitalized - The changelog version/release does not match the package version/release (6pl1.5 vs. 6pl1-5) - The package should not own /etc/X11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 07:08:42 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176542] Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512270708.jBR78gwh001416@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176542 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-27 02:08 EST ------- BuildArch: i386 an reason for that? what about x86_64 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 07:30:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:30:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176542] Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512270730.jBR7U8xj003094@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176542 ------- Additional Comments From toth_bandi at users.sourceforge.net 2005-12-27 02:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > The URL for your spec is pointing to an old version, could you update it please? Use 'Refresh' button... I used it too. (In reply to comment #8) > BuildArch: i386 > an reason for that? what about x86_64 ? Huh! Truly. I remove it. Here is the 4th release: Spec Name or Url: http://gnome-yum.sourceforge.net/download/gnome-yum.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://gnome-yum.sourceforge.net/download/gnome-yum-0.1.2-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 07:35:56 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 02:35:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176580] Review Request: x11-ssh-askpass -- the cool brother of gnome-ssh-askpass In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512270735.jBR7Zu8J003637@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11-ssh-askpass -- the cool brother of gnome-ssh-askpass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176580 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-27 02:35 EST ------- You have asked and got a confirmation that x11-ssh-askpass won't be coming back in the near future FC openssh packages, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 08:01:27 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:01:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176591] New: Review Request: php-json: An extremely fast PHP extension for JSON Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176591 Summary: Review Request: php-json: An extremely fast PHP extension for JSON Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: ivazquez at ivazquez.net QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/php-json.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/php-json-1.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: php-json is an extremely fast PHP C extension for JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) serialisation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 10:19:54 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:19:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176525] Review Request: python-setuptools: Download, build, install, upgrade, and uninstall Python packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512271019.jBRAJsb0018493@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-setuptools: Download, build, install, upgrade, and uninstall Python packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176525 mitr at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |mitr at redhat.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From mitr at redhat.com 2005-12-27 05:19 EST ------- - rpmlint matches the above * licenses: both are OK * not-zip-safe: the code uses existence of the file as a flag, so it should be packaged - package name, spec file name OK - conforms to PackagingGuidelines - license text not included in package - source matches upstream - builds fine on i386 fc4, "import setuptools" works - no forbidden BuildRequires - owns all necessary directories Accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 10:29:13 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:29:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176580] Review Request: x11-ssh-askpass -- the cool brother of gnome-ssh-askpass In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512271029.jBRATDQU019345@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11-ssh-askpass -- the cool brother of gnome-ssh-askpass https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176580 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2005-12-27 05:29 EST ------- "Feel free to package the x11-ssh-askpass in Fedora Extras." from bug #176312#1 should be enough... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 10:43:22 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:43:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512271043.jBRAhM7U021086@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-27 05:43 EST ------- there is a typ in this file: Source0: http://initng.thinktux.net/download/v0.4/initng-%{version}.tar.gz should be: Source0: http://initng.thinktux.net/download/v0.5/initng-%{version}.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 10:45:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 05:45:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512271045.jBRAjCtN021426@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran at feuerpokemon.de 2005-12-27 05:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #140) > what about the selinux issue? > 0.4.8-svn does not seem to initalize it at all (all files become unlabled) the selinux problem is beeing worked on upstream see: http://bugzilla.initng.thinktux.net/show_bug.cgi?id=365 if anyone want to help then fell free to do it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr Tue Dec 27 11:23:59 2005 From: eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr (Eric Tanguy) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:23:59 +0100 Subject: Extras and license Message-ID: <1135682640.2961.4.camel@bureau.maison> Is BSD (Berkeley Standard Distribution) license acceptable for fedora extras or not ? Thanks Eric From ivazquez at ivazquez.net Tue Dec 27 11:31:04 2005 From: ivazquez at ivazquez.net (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:31:04 -0500 Subject: Extras and license In-Reply-To: <1135682640.2961.4.camel@bureau.maison> References: <1135682640.2961.4.camel@bureau.maison> Message-ID: <1135683064.4522.0.camel@ignacio.lan> On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 12:23 +0100, Eric Tanguy wrote: > Is BSD (Berkeley Standard Distribution) license acceptable for fedora > extras or not ? http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Legal -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From triad at df.lth.se Tue Dec 27 11:32:13 2005 From: triad at df.lth.se (Linus Walleij) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:32:13 +0100 (CET) Subject: Extras and license In-Reply-To: <1135682640.2961.4.camel@bureau.maison> References: <1135682640.2961.4.camel@bureau.maison> Message-ID: On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Eric Tanguy wrote: > Is BSD (Berkeley Standard Distribution) license acceptable for fedora > extras or not ? The BSD *without* the advertising clause (almost nobody has that nowadays) is AFAIK perfectly acceptable. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_license Linus From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 11:34:00 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:34:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173459] Review Request: initng In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512271134.jBRBY0Ob027429@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se 2005-12-27 06:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #137) > instead of the net script it would maybe make sense to startup > /etc/init.d/network somehow. any better idea for approaching that? (per default > the gen runlevel script didnt pick up my pppoe device in the auto start list). I've added some code to gen_system_runlevel (in svn) that checks in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts which interfaces that ought to be in default runlevel. Hopefully this will pick up your pppoe. Please check it out! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 11:38:47 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:38:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 169624] Review Request: TestDisk, tool to check and undelete partition In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512271138.jBRBclNq027841@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TestDisk, tool to check and undelete partition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169624 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-27 06:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > One other thing I just noticed that I'm not sure about myself. The spec file has: > %doc %{_mandir}/man1/testdisk.1* > %doc %{_mandir}/man1/photorec.1* > > Uhh, do we ship man pages as doc? To answer my own question: Seems we sometimes > do according to a grep through a extras cvs checkout > [rpmbuild at truhe devel]$ grep /man./ */*.spec | grep \%doc | wc -l > 35 > [rpmbuild at truhe devel]$ grep /man./ */*.spec | wc -l > 1071 > > @fedora-extras-list: Any option on this? IMHO man pages should not be marked as %doc. rpmbuild in Fedora automatically marks manpages as %doc so there is no need to do it explicitly like this. I think the same goes for info files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 11:53:31 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 06:53:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173683] Review Request: bidiv (BiDi Viewer) - display logical-Hebrew text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512271153.jBRBrVoI029699@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bidiv (BiDi Viewer) - display logical-Hebrew text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173683 ------- Additional Comments From paul at city-fan.org 2005-12-27 06:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > However, there must be a smarter way to add that COPYING file, when it is > > missing from the upstream package > > I believe you should contact the upstream author and ask him to mention the > version of GPL he is releasing the package in. Nowhere in the package (including > the C source) the version of the GPL is mentioned. The "no warranty" clause is > not there either. This makes the package's license ambiguous. Please direct the > author to the final section in the GPL, How to Apply These Terms to Your New > Programs: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html#SEC4 If upstream does not include the license text, you should ask upstream to do so for future releases but there is no need to add the license text obtained from elsewhere to your RPM package. The requirement to include the license text applies only if upstream provide it. > Also, I would recommend: > * Formatting the SPEC file according to the default Fedora format (as created by > fedora-rpmnewspec); > * Discarding the %{?dist} tag, as it is not used in the SPEC file for anything. > I think the dist tag is only for cases when there are different Requires or > BuildRequires for different disto releases (See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DistTag). Different "Requires" would include those auto-generated by RPM. Since this is a binary package and will be linking against system libraries, it's likely that different distro releases will have different dependencies, so I'd keep the dist tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr Tue Dec 27 11:37:36 2005 From: eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr (Eric Tanguy) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:37:36 +0100 Subject: Extras and license In-Reply-To: <1135683064.4522.0.camel@ignacio.lan> References: <1135682640.2961.4.camel@bureau.maison> <1135683064.4522.0.camel@ignacio.lan> Message-ID: <1135683456.2961.5.camel@bureau.maison> Le mardi 27 d?cembre 2005 ? 06:31 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams a ?crit : > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 12:23 +0100, Eric Tanguy wrote: > > Is BSD (Berkeley Standard Distribution) license acceptable for fedora > > extras or not ? > > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Legal > yes i read it but it's difficult for me to make difference between modified BSD and original BSD ... Eric From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 12:39:01 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:39:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173683] Review Request: bidiv (BiDi Viewer) - display logical-Hebrew text In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512271239.jBRCd1Ra000773@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bidiv (BiDi Viewer) - display logical-Hebrew text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173683 ------- Additional Comments From roozbeh at farsiweb.info 2005-12-27 07:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > If upstream does not include the license text, you should ask upstream to do so > for future releases but there is no need to add the license text obtained from > elsewhere to your RPM package. The requirement to include the license text > applies only if upstream provide it. That's right, but my point is that the upstream license is unclear (version is not known), and we better know the license of what we redistribute. So we better contact the upstream author about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 12:40:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173181] Review Request: buoh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512271240.jBRCeSRc000876@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buoh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173181 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2005-12-27 07:40 EST ------- Okay. Looked into it. When "gettext" is not installed, the configure script defines $DATADIRNAME as empty instead of "share". I believe gettext is in mock's default build environment, but I would suggest adding it nevertheless as a build requirement. Remaining issues: * No desktop menu icon. It's installed into a private directory (/usr/share/buoh/pixmaps) which is not searched in by the desktop environment. * .desktop file ought to be installed with desktop-file-install (BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils) and - should include category "X-Fedora" - Terminal=false instead of Terminal=0 according to freedesktop standard (run desktop-file-validate on the file to see) Run-time observation: * Menu "Help > Contents" doesn't do anything. Else it seems to work. You may fix the desktop menu issues within Fedora Extras CVS. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From roozbeh at farsiweb.info Tue Dec 27 13:06:12 2005 From: roozbeh at farsiweb.info (Roozbeh Pournader) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:36:12 +0330 Subject: Extras' plague-server and %{ix86} Message-ID: <1135688772.3019.16.camel@tameshk.bamdad.org> We are having a discussion on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176434 about whether or not the Extras' plague-server will build i686, i586, ... versions of a package if the ExclusiveArch passed to it is %{ix86}, which according to my /usr/lib/rpm/macros will expand to the following: i386 i486 i586 i686 pentium3 pentium4 athlon It seems that Thorsten's plague-server actually builds an i686 version of the package, while some packages in extras (like athcool-0.3.11-3.fc5) use the %{ix86} macro and were only built as i386 in extras. Would someone with more knowledge of Extras' plague-server enlighten us? roozbeh From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 13:49:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:49:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176591] Review Request: php-json: An extremely fast PHP extension for JSON In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512271349.jBRDnwnE005884@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-json: An extremely fast PHP extension for JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176591 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://www.aurore.net/projec | |ts/php-json/ CC| |dmitry at butskoy.name ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-27 08:49 EST ------- As this package can be built with different "main" phps, IMHO it is better to do "phpize" (i.e., "phpize --clean" after untar to clear, and then "phpize" to create needed stuff). PHP-4.3.11 (FC3), PHP-5.0.4 (FC4) and PHP-5.1.1 (FC5) can have different phpize results. It seems that upstream developers already run some "phpize" (like an analogue of autotools), but it is more robust to rerun it for different php versions. Hint: %prep %setup -q -n php-json-ext-%{version} phpize --clean phpize %build %configure make %{?_smp_mflags} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 27 14:16:02 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:16:02 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051227141602.08DA58005@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 24 ddskk-12.2.0-7.fc5 drivel-2.0.2-1.fc5 gobby-0.3.0-3.fc5 gossip-0.9-8.fc5 grisbi-0.5.7-2.fc5 hpic-0.52-5.fc5 irssi-0.8.10-1.fc5 libetpan-0.41-1.fc5 liferea-1.0-3.fc5 liferea-1.0-4.fc5 loudmouth-1.0.1-4.fc5 makebootfat-1.4-2.fc5 milter-greylist-2.0.2-2.fc5 mimetic-0.8.9-3.fc5 munin-1.2.4-5.fc5 nethack-vultures-1.11.1-3.fc5 obby-0.3.0-1.fc5 python-reportlab-1.20-4.fc5 python-simpy-1.6.1-3.fc5 rxvt-unicode-6.0-1.fc5 scim-fcitx-3.1.1-2.fc5 uim-1.0.1-1.fc5 wv-1.2.0-1.fc5 xca-0.5.1-4.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 27 14:26:42 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:26:42 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051227142642.7337D8005@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 16 celestia-1.4.0-1.fc4 darcs-1.0.5-1.fc4 ddskk-12.2.0-7.fc4 drivel-2.0.2-1.fc4 gentium-fonts-1.02-2 hpic-0.52-5.fc4 makebootfat-1.4-2.fc4 milter-greylist-1.6-4.fc4 munin-1.2.4-5.fc4 nethack-vultures-1.11.1-3.fc4 python-simpy-1.6.1-3.fc4 rxvt-unicode-6.0-1.fc4 scim-fcitx-3.1.1-2.fc4 scim-tables-0.5.5-1.fc4 uim-1.0.1-1.fc4 xca-0.5.1-4.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 27 14:35:29 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:35:29 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051227143529.AE3258005@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 13 darcs-1.0.5-1.fc3 drivel-2.0.2-1.fc3 hpic-0.52-5.fc3 makebootfat-1.4-2.fc3 milter-greylist-1.6-4.fc3 munin-1.2.4-5.fc3 nethack-vultures-1.11.1-3.fc3 python-simpy-1.6.1-3.fc3 rxvt-unicode-6.0-1.fc3 scim-fcitx-3.1.1-2.fc3 scim-tables-0.5.5-1.fc3 tetex-xcolor-2.09-1.fc3 uim-1.0.1-1.fc3 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 16:14:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:14:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176006] Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512271614.jBRGEQeU017244@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176006 bugs.michael at gmx.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |bugs.michael at gmx.net OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2005-12-27 11:14 EST ------- After a first look... streamtuner-devel package: * Missing "Requires: gtk2-devel" because else it would break the pkgconfig dependency chain. * The Cflags line in the pkgconfig file is bad. It ought not add -I/usr/include because that is a standard search path for header files already. * The included static libraries and libtool archives are _highly_ questionable. Unless you can state a very good reason why static versions of the plugin (!) DSOs should be shipped, delete them after %install or %exclude them in the %files section. streamtuner binary package: * Category X-Red-Hat-Base in .desktop file is wrong. Should be X-Fedora, because this is not Fedora Core. Run-time observation: * Clicking "Browse" button or "Help > Homepage" menu gives fatal error dialog: Unable to browse Failed to execute child process "epiphany" (no such file or directory) Looks like either a missing customisation or a missing dependency. * "xmms" also seems to be another missing requirement, as an error dialog pops up upon trying to tune in to a station. * "Record" button fails with xterm: Can't execvp streamripper: No such file or directory Looks like more missing dependencies: "xterm", and do we have "streamripper" anywhere yet? spec file issues: * Licence GPL is wrong. The included file COPYING contains is "BSD" licence text. The C source files don't mention GPL either. * Requires: gtk2 >= 2.2.2, curl >= 7.10.8, taglib >= 1.3, libidn >= 0.5.6 All of these must go. There are automatic RPM dependencies on the needed SONAMEs already. Check out "rpm -qR streamtuner". Package resolvers know which packages to install in order to get the required libraries. * Requires: pygtk2 >= 2.4.0 At a first glance it doesn't become clear why this dependency was added. * Concerning all those versions in the [build] requirements, consider dropping them. Unless, of course, you insist on verifying all of them for each and every update. ;) Basically, upstream's configure script ought to check the available build dependencies. That's enough. Trying to keep such versions in sync with updates results in a maintenance nightmare. * -devel package sub-section ought to do "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} with full %release to keep -devel package and main package in sync. * Missing dependencies on the tools used in the scriptlets: Requires(post): desktop-file-utils scrollkeeper Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils scrollkeeper Although, running update-desktop-database in the scriptlets is not necessary for this package [yet]. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 16:25:51 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:25:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175566] Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512271625.jBRGPp84018002@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kbibtex - BibTeX Editor for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175566 ------- Additional Comments From ch.nolte at fh-wolfenbuettel.de 2005-12-27 11:25 EST ------- I now did a "mock -r fedora-development-i386-core" and the SRPM works for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 16:30:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:30:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176006] Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512271630.jBRGUPID018271@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176006 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2005-12-27 11:30 EST ------- > pygtk2 Ah, for the included Python scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 16:53:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:53:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176006] Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512271653.jBRGrY0s019621@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176006 ------- Additional Comments From matthias_haase at bennewitz.com 2005-12-27 11:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > After a first look... > > > * Clicking "Browse" button or "Help > Homepage" menu gives fatal > error dialog: > > Unable to browse > Failed to execute child process > "epiphany" (no such file or directory) > Looks like either a missing customisation or a missing > dependency. One browser is required and should be added to the requirement. Which browser? Firefox? The default config file should be patched, matching this browser, I think. > * "xmms" also seems to be another missing requirement, as an > error dialog pops up upon trying to tune in to a station. Related to user settings... > * "Record" button fails with > xterm: Can't execvp streamripper: No such file or directory > Looks like more missing dependencies: "xterm", and do we have > "streamripper" anywhere yet? Yes, I have created an additional "streamripper" package already... Xterm is required only for these streamripper feature. > spec file issues: I'll change this and I'll cleanup some others tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 17:09:36 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:09:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176613] New: Review Request: Nagios - System / network monitoring application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176613 Summary: Review Request: Nagios - System / network monitoring application Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: imlinux at gmail.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Url: http://preview.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios.spec SRPM Url: http://preview.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-1.3-2.src.rpm Description: Nagios is a progam that will monitor hosts and servicees on your network. It has the ability to send email or page alerts when a problem arises and when a problem is resolved. Nagios is written in C and is deesigned to run under Linux (and some other *NIX variants) as a background process, intermittently running checks on various services that you specify. Nagios Plugins is also being reviewed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 I do not currently have anything in extras (though I have a few packages being reviewed). I would like a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 17:11:07 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:11:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512271711.jBRHB7HC020765@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2005-12-27 12:11 EST ------- Nagios is now being reviewed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176613 I forgot to mention I do not currently have a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 17:12:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:12:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176373] Review Request: ytalk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512271712.jBRHC8S7020871@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ytalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176373 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2005-12-27 12:12 EST ------- I forgot to mention earlier that I do not currently have a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 17:30:48 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:30:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176006] Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512271730.jBRHUmWX022321@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176006 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-27 12:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Which browser? Firefox? htmlview or gnome-open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 17:41:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:41:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176617] New: Review Request: libupnp Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176617 Summary: Review Request: libupnp Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.tanguy/libupnp.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.tanguy/libupnp-1.2.1a-1.src.rpm Description: The Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) SDK for Linux provides support for building UPnP-compliant control points, devices, and bridges on Linux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From qspencer at ieee.org Tue Dec 27 17:48:11 2005 From: qspencer at ieee.org (Quentin Spencer) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:48:11 -0600 Subject: Extras' plague-server and %{ix86} In-Reply-To: <1135688772.3019.16.camel@tameshk.bamdad.org> References: <1135688772.3019.16.camel@tameshk.bamdad.org> Message-ID: <43B17E5B.4020706@ieee.org> Roozbeh Pournader wrote: >We are having a discussion on > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176434 > >about whether or not the Extras' plague-server will build i686, >i586, ... versions of a package if the ExclusiveArch passed to it is >%{ix86}, which according to my /usr/lib/rpm/macros will expand to the >following: > > i386 i486 i586 i686 pentium3 pentium4 athlon > >It seems that Thorsten's plague-server actually builds an i686 version >of the package, while some packages in extras (like >athcool-0.3.11-3.fc5) use the %{ix86} macro and were only built as i386 >in extras. > >Would someone with more knowledge of Extras' plague-server enlighten us? > > I would like to add an additional question to this: I have been packaging atlas with separate sub-packages: atlas-sse atlas-sse2, etc. I never tried to make atlas packages for each subarch because I thought the build system wasn't capable. Has that changed? -Quentin From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 17:46:06 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:46:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176618] New: Review Request: ushare Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176618 Summary: Review Request: ushare Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.tanguy/ushare.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.tanguy/ushare-0.9.5-2.src.rpm Description: uShare is a UPnP (TM) A/V Media Server. It implements the server component that provides UPnP media devices with information on available multimedia files. uShare uses the built-in http server of libupnp to stream the files to clients. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From gajownik at fedora.pl Tue Dec 27 17:58:53 2005 From: gajownik at fedora.pl (Dawid Gajownik) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:58:53 +0100 Subject: pysqlite 2.x? Message-ID: <43B180DD.9040309@fedora.pl> Hi! Would anyone be willing to maintain pysqlite 2.0.5? in Fedora Extras, please? I'm not able to update gajim to version 0.9.1 because of this dependency. ? http://initd.org/tracker/pysqlite Thanks in advance, Dawid -- ^_* From gajownik at fedora.pl Tue Dec 27 18:16:24 2005 From: gajownik at fedora.pl (Dawid Gajownik) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:16:24 +0100 Subject: Extras' plague-server and %{ix86} In-Reply-To: <1135688772.3019.16.camel@tameshk.bamdad.org> References: <1135688772.3019.16.camel@tameshk.bamdad.org> Message-ID: <43B184F8.8070902@fedora.pl> Dnia 12/27/2005 02:06 PM, U?ytkownik Roozbeh Pournader napisa?: > some packages in extras (like athcool-0.3.11-3.fc5) use the %{ix86} > macro and were only built as i386 in extras. Oh, that's my package :) Should I change ?%{ix86}? to ?i386?? -- ^_* From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 18:45:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:45:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173181] Review Request: buoh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512271845.jBRIjF21027926@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buoh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173181 chabotc at xs4all.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From chabotc at xs4all.nl 2005-12-27 13:45 EST ------- Added perl, perl-XML-Parser (could fail on configure if missing) and desktop file utils to build requires, also to fixup the missing icons and desktop file added the following to the spec file in %install: mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/pixmaps /usr/bin/install -m 644 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/buoh/pixmaps/buoh*.png $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/pixmaps/ perl -pi -e "s,Terminal=0,Terminal=false,g" $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/buoh.desktop desktop-file-install --delete-original \ --vendor=gnome \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ --add-category X-Fedora \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/buoh.desktop Thanks for the Approved & sponsorship, i'll add it to FC extra's now! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From roozbeh at farsiweb.info Tue Dec 27 18:52:26 2005 From: roozbeh at farsiweb.info (Roozbeh Pournader) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:22:26 +0330 Subject: Extras' plague-server and %{ix86} In-Reply-To: <43B184F8.8070902@fedora.pl> References: <1135688772.3019.16.camel@tameshk.bamdad.org> <43B184F8.8070902@fedora.pl> Message-ID: <1135709546.3019.22.camel@tameshk.bamdad.org> On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 19:16 +0100, Dawid Gajownik wrote: > Dnia 12/27/2005 02:06 PM, U?ytkownik Roozbeh Pournader napisa?: > > some packages in extras (like athcool-0.3.11-3.fc5) use the %{ix86} > > macro and were only built as i386 in extras. > > Oh, that's my package :) Should I change ?%{ix86}? to ?i386?? Well, we don't know yet. roozbeh From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 21:29:17 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:29:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176591] Review Request: php-json: An extremely fast PHP extension for JSON In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512272129.jBRLTHlZ006917@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-json: An extremely fast PHP extension for JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176591 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-27 16:29 EST ------- Updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 21:54:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:54:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176542] Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512272154.jBRLsPLr009391@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176542 ------- Additional Comments From stickster at gmail.com 2005-12-27 16:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #6) > > The URL for your spec is pointing to an old version, could you update it please? > > Use 'Refresh' button... I used it too. I doubt that was the problem, since it was the first time I visited. But I see the right version now, so thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 22:34:28 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:34:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173181] Review Request: buoh In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512272234.jBRMYSSD011396@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: buoh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173181 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2005-12-27 17:34 EST ------- We use namespace "fedora", so --vendor=fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 22:49:54 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:49:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174325] Review Request: mod_spin Apache module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512272249.jBRMnsFn012953@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_spin Apache module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174325 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-27 17:49 EST ------- FYI to reviewers: I'm going to sponsor Bojan for libapreq2 maintenance in Extras, and as far as I'm concerned, this package can thus be reviewed by a non-sponsor contributor. (Hi mpeters, icon... ;)). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 27 23:09:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 18:09:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176071] Review Request: silgraphite In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512272309.jBRN9NJb014097@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: silgraphite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176071 ------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com 2005-12-27 18:09 EST ------- used patch suggested by upstream for g++ 4.1.0 explicit issue http://mpeters.us/silgraphite/silgraphite-2.0.0-0.11.svn106.src.rpm http://mpeters.us/silgraphite/silgraphite.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From admin at ramshacklestudios.com Wed Dec 28 03:15:43 2005 From: admin at ramshacklestudios.com (Peter Gordon) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:15:43 -0800 Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report In-Reply-To: <20051227142642.7337D8005@extras64.linux.duke.edu> References: <20051227142642.7337D8005@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Message-ID: <1135739743.3311.5.camel@tuxhugger> On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 09:26 -0500, buildsys at fedoraproject.org wrote: > Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 16 > > drivel-2.0.2-1.fc4 > [...] > nethack-vultures-1.11.1-3.fc4 > python-simpy-1.6.1-3.fc4 > [...] Perhaps I'm misconfigured something, but Yum tells me that there is no updates for these three packages (the only three I've installed from that list). I've even tried configuring the repository to point to Red Hat's official/primary mirror[1]. However, Yum still reports that no packages are selected for update. Sure enough, if I browse that in a web browser, those RPMs are not there. Is it supposed to take this long (almost 12 hours at the time of this message) for the build system to push the RPMs to the mirrors? Thanks. [1] http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/4/i386/ -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key: 0xDA3634D7 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From skvidal at linux.duke.edu Wed Dec 28 03:40:53 2005 From: skvidal at linux.duke.edu (seth vidal) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:40:53 -0500 Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report In-Reply-To: <1135739743.3311.5.camel@tuxhugger> References: <20051227142642.7337D8005@extras64.linux.duke.edu> <1135739743.3311.5.camel@tuxhugger> Message-ID: <1135741253.4158.50.camel@cutter> On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 19:15 -0800, Peter Gordon wrote: > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 09:26 -0500, buildsys at fedoraproject.org wrote: > > Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 16 > > > > drivel-2.0.2-1.fc4 > > [...] > > nethack-vultures-1.11.1-3.fc4 > > python-simpy-1.6.1-3.fc4 > > [...] > > Perhaps I'm misconfigured something, but Yum tells me that there is no > updates for these three packages (the only three I've installed from > that list). I've even tried configuring the repository to point to Red > Hat's official/primary mirror[1]. However, Yum still reports that no > packages are selected for update. Sure enough, if I browse that in a web > browser, those RPMs are not there. > > Is it supposed to take this long (almost 12 hours at the time of this > message) for the build system to push the RPMs to the mirrors? Thanks. > > [1] http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/4/i386/ Extras syncs like this: - extras master is mirrored by download.fedora.redhat.com which is mirrored by everyone else. So it can take a full day depending on when people's cron jobs run. -sv From admin at ramshacklestudios.com Wed Dec 28 03:46:52 2005 From: admin at ramshacklestudios.com (Peter Gordon) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:46:52 -0800 Subject: [resolved] Re: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report In-Reply-To: <1135741253.4158.50.camel@cutter> References: <20051227142642.7337D8005@extras64.linux.duke.edu> <1135739743.3311.5.camel@tuxhugger> <1135741253.4158.50.camel@cutter> Message-ID: <1135741612.3311.14.camel@tuxhugger> On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 22:40 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > Extras syncs like this: > - extras master is mirrored by download.fedora.redhat.com which is > mirrored by everyone else. > > So it can take a full day depending on when people's cron jobs run. > > -sv That explains it, then. Thanks, Seth! :) -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key: 0xDA3634D7 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From jeff.pitman at gmail.com Wed Dec 28 11:52:51 2005 From: jeff.pitman at gmail.com (Jeff Pitman) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:52:51 +0800 Subject: RPM Packaging and Python Eggs Message-ID: <6b9c17630512280352h68047491xd7f7d6215e63525@mail.gmail.com> Hi, Just wanted to share this. As the Python Eggs concept proliferates, there is an option to bypass the whole mess: --old-and-unmanageable. This could be used as an alternative to patching setup.py to point to the old distutils. So: %{__python} setup.py install --root=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT Becomes: %{__python} setup.py install --old-and-unmanageable --root=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT Obviously, this breaks if it's a regular distutils setup.py. And, what makes it more fun is that Py2.2 doesn't work. So, patching might be the best when you care about that. If you're guaranteed that the spec is only forward moving (ie extras and rawhide), then the option above will work and make the spec cleaner. While I've written off Eggs as a way to manage system-level python lib packages, it may be useful for managing pkgs in $HOME for multi-user systems. Thoughts? -- -jeff From ivazquez at ivazquez.net Wed Dec 28 12:03:48 2005 From: ivazquez at ivazquez.net (Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 07:03:48 -0500 Subject: RPM Packaging and Python Eggs In-Reply-To: <6b9c17630512280352h68047491xd7f7d6215e63525@mail.gmail.com> References: <6b9c17630512280352h68047491xd7f7d6215e63525@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <1135771428.15008.9.camel@ignacio.lan> On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 19:52 +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote: > While I've written off Eggs as a way to manage system-level python lib > packages, it may be useful for managing pkgs in $HOME for multi-user > systems. Thoughts? While they may be overkill that certainly doesn't mean they're useless. As more and more Python libraries migrate to using eggs it's going to become less convenient to have to futz with every setup.py file just to comment out the libraries that don't have eggs. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams http://fedora.ivazquez.net/ gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 28 13:57:29 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176591] Review Request: php-json: An extremely fast PHP extension for JSON In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512281357.jBSDvTM4021599@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-json: An extremely fast PHP extension for JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176591 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-28 08:57 EST ------- OK Remarks & nitpicks: - autodetection of extdir and version can be simplified a little (as good php-config always present in the Fedora's php-devel package) - Use %{?dist} in the release field (as this package hardly depends to specific distro's php version) - Remove leading "An" from the summary - Some %check section would be useful (at least to check that this module is successfully attached at run-time and is visible by the /usr/bin/php). See all these suggestions in the patch below. I am confused a little by the fact there is no any documentation in this package. Perhaps some data can be obtained from the upstream's site? (By simple copying some *.html files etc.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 28 17:28:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 12:28:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176653] New: Review Request: python-sqlite2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176653 Summary: Review Request: python-sqlite2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: gajownik at gmail.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://wiki.fedora.pl/gajownik/python-sqlite2.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://wiki.fedora.pl/gajownik/python-sqlite2-2.0.5-1.src.rpm Description: pysqlite is an interface to the SQLite 3.x embedded relational database engine. It is almost fully compliant with the Python database API version 2.0 also exposes the unique features of SQLite. rpmlint warnings: [rpm-build at X SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-sqlite2-2.0.5-1.src.rpm W: python-sqlite2 invalid-license zlib/libpng [rpm-build at X SRPMS]$ I copied information about licence from PKG-INFO file. I have also question about package name. Should it be python-sqlite2 (there is python-sqlite in Core), pysqlite2 or python-pysqlite2 (like in Debian)? BTW I feel like a drunk child in a fog when it comes to packaging python addons ;) I based spec ifle on /usr/share/fedora/spectemplate-python.spec from fedora-rpmdevtools but I could have done something stupid... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 28 18:09:55 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:09:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165899] Review Request: pam_pkcs11 : PKCS #11 PAM login module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512281809.jBSI9tjE006954@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_pkcs11 : PKCS #11 PAM login module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165899 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-28 13:09 EST ------- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From gajownik at fedora.pl Wed Dec 28 20:26:04 2005 From: gajownik at fedora.pl (Dawid Gajownik) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:26:04 +0100 Subject: rpms/clisp/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 clisp.spec, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.3, 1.4 In-Reply-To: <200512281950.jBSJofql004079@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> References: <200512281950.jBSJofql004079@cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com> Message-ID: <43B2F4DC.1080307@fedora.pl> Dnia 12/28/2005 08:51 PM, U?ytkownik G?rard Milmeister (gemi) napisa?: > Author: gemi > -Source: http://download.sourceforge.net/clisp/clisp-2.35.tar.bz2 > +Source: http://download.sourceforge.net/clisp/clisp-2.36.tar.bz2 If you want less work in the future, you can always use: Source0: http://download.sourceforge.net/clisp/clisp-%{version}.tar.bz2 Hope that helps. -- ^_* From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 28 23:36:32 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 18:36:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167714] Review Request: pam_usb: PAM module for use with DSA key pairs and removable devices In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512282336.jBSNaWok015615@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_usb: PAM module for use with DSA key pairs and removable devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167714 wart at kobold.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2005-12-28 18:36 EST ------- All needswork items have been fixed. Package now compiles and runs on x86_64. rpmlint has no complaints for the base package, and the following output for pam_usb-hotplug, both of which can be ignored. W: pam_usb-hotplug no-documentation E: pam_usb-hotplug executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/pam_usb/handlers/xlock.sh APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 29 00:01:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:01:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176591] Review Request: php-json: An extremely fast PHP extension for JSON In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512290001.jBT01YhZ018271@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-json: An extremely fast PHP extension for JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176591 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-28 19:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > - autodetection of extdir and version can be simplified a little (as good > php-config always present in the Fedora's php-devel package) Except when mock does its depsolving. > - Use %{?dist} in the release field (as this package hardly depends to specific distro's php version) I always add that once it's in CVS. > - Remove leading "An" from the summary Sorry, but I refuse to turn the Summary into grammatical garbage. Bring it up on the mailing list if you wish to discuss this. Updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 29 00:43:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:43:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175426] Review Request: tkcon - Tcl console shell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512290043.jBT0hQIQ021455@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkcon - Tcl console shell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175426 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2005-12-28 19:43 EST ------- Suggested changes sound good. I've applied them all, and added a desktop file. New spec file and SRPM can be found here: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tkcon.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/tkcon-2.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 29 00:57:19 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:57:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174265] Review Request: itcl - Object oriented extension to Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512290057.jBT0vJvM022353@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itcl - Object oriented extension to Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174265 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2005-12-28 19:57 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > * Why not package the itk extensions seperately? tcl and tk are seperate. Tcl and Tk are built from separate source archives, while itcl/itk use a single source tarball for both packages. This gives me two choices if they are to be packaged separately: - Create two spec files that point to the same source tarball so that the package names (itcl, itk) can be preserved - Create itk as a subpackage so that only one copy of the source tarball is needed: itcl, itcl-itk I'm leaning towards the second approach, even if it doesn't preserve the upstream package name. Using the same source tarball in two packages seems awkward and error-prone. > * Source 0 is not available > (http://sourceforge.net/project/incrtcl/itcl3.2.1_src.tgz) > (wiki: QAChecklist item 2) > It seems the only way to enable automated sourceforge downloads is to hard code > a mirror. I'll fix this in the next spec file. > * 3.3 seems to have been released. 3.3 is still a release candidate, and has build problems on Linux. Additionally, the 3.3 release breaks the iwidgets package, which is the main reason that I'm packaging itcl to begin with. Once itcl 3.3 works with iwidgets then I'll upgrade. > * Some compiler warnings, mostly about pointers, that you may want to inform > upstream about. Will do. > * To clarify, the large patch included is to update configure, respect DESTDIR, > look in lib64, etc.? May go upstream, possibly saving 100KB from the srpm! Correct. I'll notifiy upstream so that this makes it into the 3.3 final release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bojan at rexursive.com Thu Dec 29 01:58:30 2005 From: bojan at rexursive.com (Bojan Smojver) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:58:30 +1100 Subject: The GNU Gatekeeper Message-ID: <20051229125830.atx78w27ysogwocg@imp.rexursive.com> Is there a legal reason for GNU Gatekeeper (http://www.gnugk.org/) not being in Extras? Or is it simply lack of interest/developers etc.? -- Bojan From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 29 06:24:43 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:24:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176525] Review Request: python-setuptools: Download, build, install, upgrade, and uninstall Python packages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512290624.jBT6OhLN019129@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-setuptools: Download, build, install, upgrade, and uninstall Python packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176525 ivazquez at ivazquez.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-29 01:24 EST ------- Built on FC-4 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 29 06:25:03 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:25:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176526] Review Request: TestGears: Unit testing for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512290625.jBT6P3TH019216@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TestGears: Unit testing for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176526 Bug 176526 depends on bug 176525, which changed state. Bug 176525 Summary: Review Request: python-setuptools: Download, build, install, upgrade, and uninstall Python packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176525 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 29 06:25:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:25:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176532] Review Request: TurboGears: Back-to-front web development in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512290625.jBT6PEc4019237@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboGears: Back-to-front web development in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176532 Bug 176532 depends on bug 176525, which changed state. Bug 176525 Summary: Review Request: python-setuptools: Download, build, install, upgrade, and uninstall Python packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176525 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 29 07:54:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 02:54:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174265] Review Request: itcl - Object oriented extension to Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512290754.jBT7sOvS026510@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itcl - Object oriented extension to Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174265 ------- Additional Comments From jamatos at fc.up.pt 2005-12-29 02:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > > - Create two spec files that point to the same source tarball so that the > package names (itcl, itk) can be preserved > - Create itk as a subpackage so that only one copy of the source tarball is > needed: itcl, itcl-itk > > I'm leaning towards the second approach, even if it doesn't preserve the > upstream package name. Using the same source tarball in two packages seems > awkward and error-prone. Why not the second hypothesis calling the subpackage itk instead of itcl-itk? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 29 09:11:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 04:11:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165899] Review Request: pam_pkcs11 : PKCS #11 PAM login module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512290911.jBT9BEMc001654@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_pkcs11 : PKCS #11 PAM login module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165899 ------- Additional Comments From jonsito at teleline.es 2005-12-29 04:11 EST ------- pong :-) About make_hash_link.sh . My last svn commit to opensc.org site makes pam_pkcs11 now handle either hash_dir (old behaviour) or cacert files. In the later case, there is no real need to use make_hash_link.sh script anymore. My plan is move this script to /usr/lib/pam_pkcs11 (or whatever site according to LSB) Just starting several "semi-cosmetic" changes to code and preparing a new 0.6 release Juan Antonio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 29 12:19:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:19:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176591] Review Request: php-json: An extremely fast PHP extension for JSON In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512291219.jBTCJ8cT024198@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-json: An extremely fast PHP extension for JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176591 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-29 07:19 EST ------- > Except when mock does its depsolving. Not understood how mock can have issues here, but it is not a blocker :) > I always add that once it's in CVS. Why not before? IMO the PackageGuidelines requires it at review stage... Anyway, all other guys do it before CVS... - installed pam-json.html has execution bit set. Actually, "x" bit is set immediately after "install -p %{SOURCE1}". Perhaps changing "install" to "cp" can solve this. - Initially, I resisted to increase release numbers after each trivial change. But eventually various reviewers have forced me to do it always... ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 29 12:34:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:34:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176006] Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512291234.jBTCYCEC025853@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Streamtuner - a stream directory browser. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176006 ------- Additional Comments From matthias_haase at bennewitz.com 2005-12-29 07:34 EST ------- (In reply to comment #13) > > pygtk2 > > Ah, for the included Python scripts. All required cleanups are done now (I think so) ;-) Beep-media-player, htmlview and xterm are added to the requirement. I had to patch several files to change the default configuration. You have to delete ~/.streamtuner/ to make these changes visible. The streamripper rpm is an usefull add-on, but isn't a requirement at this time, it uses libmad. The changed files are there already: Spec Url: http://www.bennewitz.com/rpms/streamtuner.spec SRPM Url: http://www.bennewitz.com/rpms/streamtuner-0.99.99-5.fc4.src.rpm -- Matthias -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 29 12:42:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:42:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175426] Review Request: tkcon - Tcl console shell In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512291242.jBTCgEfP026624@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tkcon - Tcl console shell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175426 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-29 07:42 EST ------- Works good. MUST/SHOULD items OK APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 29 16:23:15 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:23:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175844] Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512291623.jBTGNFNs016961@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175844 ------- Additional Comments From somlo at cmu.edu 2005-12-29 11:23 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/wmx.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/wmx-6pl1-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 29 18:33:57 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:33:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174265] Review Request: itcl - Object oriented extension to Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512291833.jBTIXvLq029633@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itcl - Object oriented extension to Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174265 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2005-12-29 13:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > - Create two spec files that point to the same source tarball so that the > > package names (itcl, itk) can be preserved > > - Create itk as a subpackage so that only one copy of the source tarball is > > needed: itcl, itcl-itk > > > > I'm leaning towards the second approach, even if it doesn't preserve the > > upstream package name. Using the same source tarball in two packages seems > > awkward and error-prone. > > Why not the second hypothesis calling the subpackage itk instead of > itcl-itk? Because I didn't know about "%package -n" until 10 minutes ago. :) I've now split it up into 4 packages: itcl, itk, itcl-devel, itk-devel The new spec file and srpm addressing the issues raised in comment #1 can be found at: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/itcl-3.2.1-4.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/itcl.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 29 18:37:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:37:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174268] Review Request: itcl-iwidgets - object oriented megawidgets for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512291837.jBTIbGSQ029823@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itcl-iwidgets - object oriented megawidgets for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174268 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2005-12-29 13:37 EST ------- Commenting on my own package: New spec/srpm are needed to reflect new package names for itcl and itk: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174265 This package should also be renamed "iwidgets" to match upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 29 19:17:18 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:17:18 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051229191718.1E7268005@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 8 clisp-2.36-7.fc3 dejavu-fonts-2.1-1.fc3 libqalculate-0.9.2-2.fc3 perl-SNMP_Session-1.08-1.fc3 perl-Text-WikiFormat-0.77-1.fc3 qalculate-gtk-0.9.2-1.fc3 qalculate-kde-0.9.2-1.fc3 rxvt-unicode-6.1-1.fc3 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 29 19:22:40 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:22:40 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051229192240.7DE2A8005@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 15 bzflag-2.0.4-0.fc4.3 clisp-2.36-7.fc4 dejavu-fonts-2.1-1.fc4 htop-0.6-1.fc4 htop-0.6-2.fc4 libqalculate-0.9.2-1.fc4 perl-HTML-Template-2.8-1.fc4 perl-SNMP_Session-1.08-1.fc4 perl-Text-WikiFormat-0.77-1.fc4 python-formencode-0.4-1.fc4 python-setuptools-0.6a8-1.fc4 qalculate-gtk-0.9.2-1.fc4 qalculate-kde-0.9.2-1.fc4 rxvt-unicode-6.1-1.fc4 xmms-1.2.10-19.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 29 19:31:45 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:31:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176532] Review Request: TurboGears: Back-to-front web development in Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512291931.jBTJVj4l002529@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: TurboGears: Back-to-front web development in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176532 Bug 176532 depends on bug 176527, which changed state. Bug 176527 Summary: Update to latest version https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176527 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 29 20:20:17 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:20:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 165899] Review Request: pam_pkcs11 : PKCS #11 PAM login module In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512292020.jBTKKHW2007335@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_pkcs11 : PKCS #11 PAM login module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165899 ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta at iki.fi 2005-12-29 15:20 EST ------- Thanks for the update. I'll let spot decide whether to wait for 0.6 or publish the current stuff in Extras CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 29 21:51:17 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:51:17 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051229215117.D4D3F8005@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 40 Inventor-2.1.5-18.fc5 abcm2ps-4.12.3-1.fc5 balsa-2.3.8-1.fc5 baobab-2.2.2-2.fc5 buoh-0.8.1-5 bzflag-2.0.4-2 clisp-2.36-7.fc5 dclib-0.3.7-5.fc5 dejavu-fonts-2.1-1.fc5 htop-0.6-1.fc5 htop-0.6-2.fc5 libqalculate-0.9.2-1.fc5 naim-0.11.8.1-2.fc5 nethack-3.4.3-6.fc5 obby-0.3.0-1.fc5 pam_usb-0.3.3-2.fc5 perl-AppConfig-1.56-3.fc5 perl-Cache-Cache-1.04-3.fc5 perl-Error-0.15-3.fc5 perl-ExtUtils-Depends-0.205-3.fc5 perl-ExtUtils-PkgConfig-1.07-3.fc5 perl-FreezeThaw-0.43-3.fc5 perl-HTML-Template-2.8-1.fc5 perl-Pod-Escapes-1.04-3.fc5 perl-SNMP_Session-1.08-1.fc5 perl-Sub-Uplevel-0.09-3.fc5 perl-TeX-Hyphen-0.140-3.fc5 perl-Text-WikiFormat-0.77-1.fc5 perl-Tie-IxHash-1.21-4.fc5 pork-0.99.8.1-4.fc5 python-formencode-0.4-1.fc5 python-setuptools-0.6a8-1.fc5 qalculate-gtk-0.9.2-1.fc5 qalculate-kde-0.9.2-1.fc5 rxvt-unicode-6.1-1.fc5 sylpheed-claws-2.0.0-0.rc2.fc5 sylpheed-claws-plugins-1.9.100-2.fc5 tkcon-2.4-2.fc5 xmms-1.2.10-19.fc5 xprobe2-0.3-4.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From triad at df.lth.se Thu Dec 29 22:24:55 2005 From: triad at df.lth.se (Linus Walleij) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:24:55 +0100 (CET) Subject: The GNU Gatekeeper In-Reply-To: <20051229125830.atx78w27ysogwocg@imp.rexursive.com> References: <20051229125830.atx78w27ysogwocg@imp.rexursive.com> Message-ID: On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Bojan Smojver wrote: > Is there a legal reason for GNU Gatekeeper (http://www.gnugk.org/) not being > in Extras? Or is it simply lack of interest/developers etc.? Noone has suggested including it yet. Linus From christoph.wickert at nurfuerspam.de Thu Dec 29 23:08:58 2005 From: christoph.wickert at nurfuerspam.de (Christoph Wickert) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:08:58 +0100 Subject: duplicate builds Message-ID: <1135897738.19248.5.camel@hal9000.local.lan> While building some packages for devel I wasn't able to build before (due to inconsistent rawhide) I accidentally build the following duplicate packages: JobID Package 2355 xfce4-cpugraph-plugin 2356 xfce4-datetime-plugin 2357 xfce4-genmon-plugin 2364 xfce4-weather-plugin 2365 xfce4-windowlist-plugin They are exact rebuilds of the previous releases of Dec 15, nothing was changed in cvs. So I guess these packages could confuse the repo, right? Could somebody please remove them before they are added to the repo? Thanks and sorry for the noise. Christoph From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 01:16:05 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:16:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 172343] Review Request: libtomoe-gtk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512300116.jBU1G5HK026521@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtomoe-gtk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172343 ------- Additional Comments From ryo-dairiki at users.sourceforge.net 2005-12-29 20:15 EST ------- Okay, now I've fixed them. SRPM: http://proxy.f2.ymdb.yahoofs.jp/users/d1e4801f/bc/libtomoe-gtk/libtomoe-gtk-0.1.0-3.src.rpm?bcoYzKEBlvI3Cvcz Spec: http://proxy.f2.ymdb.yahoofs.jp/users/d1e4801f/bc/libtomoe-gtk/libtomoe-gtk.spec?bcoYzKEBUlB0AzLT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 02:59:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:59:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174265] Review Request: itcl - Object oriented extension to Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512300259.jBU2xIbD031840@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itcl - Object oriented extension to Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174265 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2005-12-29 21:59 EST ------- I added a missing Requires: for itk-devel in this update: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/itcl-3.2.1-5.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/itcl.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 03:02:25 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:02:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174268] Review Request: itcl-iwidgets - object oriented megawidgets for Tcl In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512300302.jBU32P9M032163@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: itcl-iwidgets - object oriented megawidgets for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174268 ------- Additional Comments From wart at kobold.org 2005-12-29 22:02 EST ------- New package that works with the updated itcl/itk packages: http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/iwidgets.spec http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/iwidgets-4.0.1-3.src.rpm This update uses the proper "iwidgets" name to match upstream. I also cleaned up the Requires: list and manually install all files since the patch to the configure script + Makefile was excessively large. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 04:12:53 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:12:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512300412.jBU4CrpD009493@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 ------- Additional Comments From paul at xtdnet.nl 2005-12-29 23:12 EST ------- Debian also uses /usr/lib/nagios/plugins. Deviating from this will cause trouble, because monitoring a mix of fedora/redhat and debian machines will need different settings for $USER1$, or additional symlinking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 04:35:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:35:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176523] Review Request: python-json: A JSON reader and writer for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512300435.jBU4ZYEO010843@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-json: A JSON reader and writer for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176523 ------- Additional Comments From symbiont at berlios.de 2005-12-29 23:35 EST ------- I know upstream uses `_', but wouldn't be more aesthetically pleasing, for rpm, to use `.'? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 07:32:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 02:32:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176697] New: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176697 Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec: http://ftp.skynet.be/pub/packman/fedora/SRPMS/i386-rtems4.7-binutils.spec SRPM: http://ftp.skynet.be/pub/packman/fedora/SRPMS/i386-rtems4.7-binutils-2.16.1-0.20051229.1.src.rpm Description: RTEMS is an OS for embedded systems. This is the GNU binutils targetting i386-rtems4.7 (i.e. linux->i386-rtems4.7 cross-binutils). I plan to submit a corresponding cross-gcc in near future. Further cross toolchains may follow, should the i386-rtems4.7 toolchain be accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 09:16:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 04:16:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175844] Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512300916.jBU9GYGB026707@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175844 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-30 04:16 EST ------- - Missing the appropriate BuildRequires for X -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 15:01:58 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:01:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176712] New: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176712 Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: rc040203 at freenet.de QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec: http://ftp.skynet.be/pub/packman/fedora/SRPMS/i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib.spec SRPM: http://ftp.skynet.be/pub/packman/fedora/SRPMS/i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib-gcc4.0.2newlib1.14.0-0.20051229.0.src.rpm Description: RTEMS is an OS for embedded systems. This is the GNU GCC's cc+c++ compiler targetting i386-rtems4.7 (i.e. a linux->i386-rtems4.7 cross compiler) and i386-rtems4.7's libc/newlib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 15:44:12 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:44:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176467] Review Request: alltray: Dock any application in the tray In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512301544.jBUFiC9O024565@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alltray: Dock any application in the tray https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176467 jspaleta at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2005-12-30 10:43 EST ------- Okay builds in mock against core development today. So eveything looks good. alltray-0.65-1.src.rpm Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 16:03:11 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:03:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512301603.jBUG3BYS026428@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2005-12-30 11:03 EST ------- Okay ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/nact/nautilus-actions-0.99-4.src.rpm compiles in mock for core-development today. And the resulting binary that i get appears to work on my rawhide system. I did some shallow testing and created some test actions. I'm starting the clock on approval. Unless someone comes up with a blocker I'll approve this 24 hours from now. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 16:18:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:18:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512301618.jBUGI9on027232@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2005-12-30 11:17 EST ------- Has the BR's been looked at since Bug #176313 has been fixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 16:22:40 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:22:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512301622.jBUGMesM027430@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2005-12-30 11:22 EST ------- It appears so... i've successfully built several packages today in mock that were previously blowing up with libXau oddness. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 16:27:08 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:27:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512301627.jBUGR8qK027675@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple at ameritech.net 2005-12-30 11:27 EST ------- I'm sure it builds, but I believe it should be using libX11-devel instead of libXdmcp-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 16:42:43 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 11:42:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512301642.jBUGghnj028490@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2005-12-30 11:42 EST ------- actually... it might not "need" either at this point. I forgot that the .4 spec included that extra buildrequires. Well I'll look at that tonite if you dont get to it first. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 17:19:04 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:19:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174275] Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512301719.jBUHJ4sX029997@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nautilus-actions - Nautilus extension for customizing the context menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174275 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun at gmail.com 2005-12-30 12:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > I'm sure it builds, but I believe it should be using libX11-devel instead of > libXdmcp-devel. The resolution of Bug #176313 now makes requiring either redundant as nautilus now depends on libX11-devel, and libX11-devel depends on both libXdmcp-devel and libXau-devel. Deji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 17:25:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:25:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176542] Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512301725.jBUHPYp8030539@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176542 ------- Additional Comments From jspaleta at gmail.com 2005-12-30 12:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > - I can't solve the consolehelper symlinks with your solving and I don't modify > this problem in the end. > (error message: > RPM build errors: > Symlink points to BuildRoot: /usr/bin/gnome-yum => > /var/tmp/gnome-yum-0.1.2-3-root-root/usr/bin/consolehelper) There are two ways of doing this currently implemented in Extras yumex in Extras has the symlinks created inside the Makefile in the source. netgo in Extras uses a construction in the specfile in the %install section: take a look at both the src.rpm for both yumex and netgo and choose a method that best suits you. Don't forget to add Requires: usermode to make sure consolehelper is installed on the system as a dependancy. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Fri Dec 30 18:18:43 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:18:43 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 3 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051230181843.0037E8005@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 3: 3 cfengine-2.1.18-1.fc3 fedora-rpmdevtools-1.4-1.fc3 perl-Config-Tiny-2.03-1.fc3 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Fri Dec 30 18:26:01 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:26:01 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras 4 Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051230182601.DDD998005@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras 4: 3 cfengine-2.1.18-1.fc4 fedora-rpmdevtools-1.4-1.fc4 perl-Config-Tiny-2.03-1.fc4 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From ville.skytta at iki.fi Fri Dec 30 18:26:23 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:26:23 +0200 Subject: duplicate builds In-Reply-To: <1135897738.19248.5.camel@hal9000.local.lan> References: <1135897738.19248.5.camel@hal9000.local.lan> Message-ID: <1135967183.30090.2.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 00:08 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > JobID Package > 2355 xfce4-cpugraph-plugin > 2356 xfce4-datetime-plugin > 2357 xfce4-genmon-plugin > 2364 xfce4-weather-plugin > 2365 xfce4-windowlist-plugin > > They are exact rebuilds of the previous releases of Dec 15, nothing was > changed in cvs. So I guess these packages could confuse the repo, right? > Could somebody please remove them before they are added to the repo? Done. From buildsys at fedoraproject.org Fri Dec 30 18:35:04 2005 From: buildsys at fedoraproject.org (buildsys at fedoraproject.org) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:35:04 -0500 (EST) Subject: Fedora Extras development Package Build Report Message-ID: <20051230183504.A2DC68005@extras64.linux.duke.edu> Packages built and released for Fedora Extras development: 18 Inventor-2.1.5-19.fc5 cfengine-2.1.18-1.fc5 fedora-rpmdevtools-1.4-1.fc5 perl-Config-Tiny-2.03-1.fc5 perl-Image-Base-1.07-5.fc5 perl-Image-Size-2.992-4.fc5 perl-Image-Xbm-1.08-4.fc5 perl-Image-Xpm-1.09-4.fc5 perl-MLDBM-2.01-3.fc5 xchat-gnome-0.8-2.fc5 xfce4-battery-plugin-0.3.0-4.fc5 xfce4-clipman-plugin-0.4.1-4.fc5 xfce4-minicmd-plugin-0.3.0-4.fc5 xfce4-notes-plugin-0.11.1-2.fc5 xfce4-showdesktop-plugin-0.4.0-4.fc5 xfce4-systemload-plugin-0.3.6-4.fc5 xfce4-taskbar-plugin-0.2.2-4.fc5 xfce4-xkb-plugin-0.3.2-5.fc5 For more information about the built packages please see the repository or the fedora Info Feed: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 20:35:38 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:35:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173105] Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512302035.jBUKZcaQ009919@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-battery-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173105 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-30 15:35 EST ------- Successfully compiled on all arches and branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From triad at df.lth.se Fri Dec 30 20:39:28 2005 From: triad at df.lth.se (Linus Walleij) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 21:39:28 +0100 (CET) Subject: xpm images and packaging policy (fwd) Message-ID: Regarding the gnokii problems, upstream have responded and will have a FE-compliant solution in the next version. I will try to pick up 0.6.11 as it is released and create something for FE based off Villes package from Livna. Linus ------------------------- From: Pawel Kot Reply-To: Discussion forum for gnokii users. To: Discussion forum for gnokii users. Subject: Re: xpm images and packaging policy Hi, 2005/12/30, Linus Walleij : > any progress? I think the best thing for us might be to go for a patched > source .tar with xgnokii removed... simple and solves the problem. > Currently we have a 3rd party repository (livna) hosting gnokii but moving > most of it into Fedora Extras and leaving just xgnokii on livna is quite > OK. Sorry I forgot to answer. Hugh and I think that to avoid too much mess we'll do the following: - leave in CVS things as they are - script to prepare the release tarball will exclude xpm with phone pictures leaving just a default one and prepare the additional XPM package We'll start with 0.6.11 with that policy if there will be no veto. I hope that would be fine. Can any other distro packages express his/her opinion on that? take care, pkot -- Pawel Kot http://www.gnokii.org/ _______________________________________________ gnokii-users mailing list gnokii-users at nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnokii-users From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 21:17:14 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:17:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 173670] Review Request: xfce4-wavelan-plugin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512302117.jBULHE4p011954@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-wavelan-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173670 fedora.wickert at arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert at arcor.de 2005-12-30 16:17 EST ------- Thanks for the review. Package builds fine on all branches & arches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 21:38:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:38:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512302138.jBULckoF013547@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2005-12-30 16:38 EST ------- I've updated the location of nagios plugins to /usr/lib/nagios/plugins. I've also removed the command.cfg file. SPEC: http://preview.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins.spec SRPM: http://preview.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins-1.4.2-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 30 21:41:26 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:41:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176613] Review Request: Nagios - System / network monitoring application In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512302141.jBULfQUK013654@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Nagios - System / network monitoring application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176613 ------- Additional Comments From imlinux at gmail.com 2005-12-30 16:41 EST ------- I've updated the default location of nagios-plugins to /usr/lib/nagios/plugins SPEC: http://preview.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios.spec SRPM: http://preview.iesabroad.org/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-1.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 03:31:07 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:31:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176591] Review Request: php-json: An extremely fast PHP extension for JSON In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512310331.jBV3V7LG003058@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-json: An extremely fast PHP extension for JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176591 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-30 22:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > > Except when mock does its depsolving. > Not understood how mock can have issues here, but it is not a blocker :) mock looks at the bare spec file and evaluates it, possibly before any BRs have been installed. Try it some day. > > I always add that once it's in CVS. > Why not before? IMO the PackageGuidelines requires it at review stage... Anyway, > all other guys do it before CVS... Most all other guys don't have %dist defined on their system, and it gives the buildsystem conniptions if I import it with %dist as .fc4 and then try to tag in FC-4. > - installed pam-json.html has execution bit set. Actually, "x" bit is set > immediately after "install -p %{SOURCE1}". Perhaps changing "install" to "cp" > can solve this. No, this is because I misused install. Fixed. > - Initially, I resisted to increase release numbers after each trivial change. > But eventually various reviewers have forced me to do it always... ;) It's not supposed to be used by the public yet, so I figure no harm, no foul. Updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 03:53:54 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:53:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176523] Review Request: python-json: A JSON reader and writer for Python In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512310353.jBV3rsur006581@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-json: A JSON reader and writer for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176523 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-30 22:53 EST ------- Works for me. http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/python-json.spec http://fedora.ivazquez.net/files/extras/python-json-3.4-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 04:17:51 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 23:17:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176467] Review Request: alltray: Dock any application in the tray In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512310417.jBV4HpPF009307@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alltray: Dock any application in the tray https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176467 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-30 23:17 EST ------- Built on FC-4. Having a problem with devel x86_64, need to investigate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 08:34:51 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 03:34:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174240] Review Request: artwiz-aleczapka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512310834.jBV8YpO0022318@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: artwiz-aleczapka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174240 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-31 03:34 EST ------- Merry Christmas and Happy New Year :) Sorry xmas was a little bit long this year and kept me from working my bugzilla tickets... here is a version with you patch applied and with the documentation included... http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-2.src.rpm http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 09:03:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:03:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 166547] Review Request: multisync - Calendar (and other PIM data) synchronization program In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512310903.jBV93xf5023815@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: multisync - Calendar (and other PIM data) synchronization program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166547 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-31 04:03 EST ------- I fixed th BR und commented on the missing smp flags (they don't work as of now). As libopensync and in conjunction with this multisync is still in the early stages of the project stuff is instable. I am trying to establish an upstream contact... Here is the new version: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/multisync-0.90.18-2.src.rpm http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/multisync.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 09:16:16 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:16:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174504] Review Request: wine-docs - Documentation for wine In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512310916.jBV9GGlI024339@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine-docs - Documentation for wine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174504 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-31 04:16 EST ------- New version: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine-docs.spec http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine-docs-0.9.4-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 09:25:06 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:25:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171526] Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512310925.jBV9P6hq024843@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171526 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-31 04:24 EST ------- Thanks for the comments I fixed the perms and the BR autoconf: I still wonder why we are stuck here and what needs to be fixed, added and so on to get this out. Comments and or suggestions as to what is needed to push this are always welcome: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine.spec http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine-0.9.4-1.src.rpm http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine-fc5.spec http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine-0.9.4-1.fc5.src.rpm and as always http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/i386/ for the fc4 bins... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 11:04:39 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:04:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176591] Review Request: php-json: An extremely fast PHP extension for JSON In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311104.jBVB4d5S032059@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-json: An extremely fast PHP extension for JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176591 dmitry at butskoy.name changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-31 06:04 EST ------- > it gives the buildsystem conniptions if I import it with %dist as .fc4 and then > try to tag in FC-4. make tag TAG_OPTS="-F" ... :) OK APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 11:16:45 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:16:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171526] Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311116.jBVBGjW8000942@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171526 ------- Additional Comments From dmitry at butskoy.name 2005-12-31 06:16 EST ------- Perhaps people are too busy... After New Year I'll try to look on it under FC3. Someone (I guess) already have success under FC4... If all formal items are OK, then the next step is to put wine into CVS and start to solve problems in building wine in the plague build system. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 11:19:34 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:19:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176733] New: Review Request: php-pear-DB (PEAR database abstraction layer) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176733 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB (PEAR database abstraction layer) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: bugs at timj.co.uk QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/php-pear-DB.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/php-pear-DB-1.7.6-1.src.rpm Description: PEAR DB is a database abstraction layer for PHP. This package actually used to be provided by the old php-pear subpackage of PHP. It was (sensibly) dropped from that as a result of bug #173808 but as a consequence it means that this package should perhaps ultimately be moved to Core rather than Extras. This package is testing the water as far as PEAR modules and Fedora Extras go; if this review goes OK it would be nice to get more PEAR packages into FE and to that end I have been working on getting the PHP/PEAR packages in Core to a state where this is easier to do (see bug #176725, bug #173804, bug #173806, bug #173810, bug #173814, bug #173270 and related bugs). My ultimate goal is that "pear makerpm" (at least as supplied by Fedora) should build FE-compatible spec files "out of the box" (or as close to it as possible). This is not yet the case, even with all the patches I've supplied, but the feedback from this bug will be useful in developing further patches towards that goal. Some particular notes: 1. The package uses the new naming convention as defined by Joe Orton in bug #173806, i.e.: Name: php-pear-DB Provides: php-pear(DB) = 1.7.6 2. With the above in mind, the spec file has at least one nod to automated generation: the %files section is populated predominantly by "/". This does result in the package owning lots of directories it doesn't actually need to; it doesn't cause any practical problems that I'm aware of but if it irks anyone then I will have to re-think things. 3. As a new FE contributor, I've been a bit confused about the whole license-file-in-package debate. Upstream (by convention AFAICT) does not seem to explicitly include license files in any PEAR packages. In this package I have manually brought in the license file. I'd rather not do this if I can avoid it; do I have to? This is my first FE package; I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 11:21:52 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:21:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176733] Review Request: php-pear-DB (PEAR database abstraction layer) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311121.jBVBLqhl001591@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB (PEAR database abstraction layer) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176733 bugs at timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jorton at redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From bugs at timj.co.uk 2005-12-31 06:21 EST ------- I'm adding Joe Orton to cc as Joe, your input here would be really appreciated. (Especially about moving this to Core, in which case I presume you would take over the package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 11:28:40 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:28:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176542] Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311128.jBVBSe5u002221@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-yum - GNOME interface for YUM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176542 ------- Additional Comments From toth_bandi at users.sourceforge.net 2005-12-31 06:28 EST ------- (In reply to comment #11) I resolved this problem in the next release: Spec Name or Url: http://gnome-yum.sourceforge.net/download/gnome-yum.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://gnome-yum.sourceforge.net/download/gnome-yum-0.1.2-5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 11:48:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:48:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176591] Review Request: php-json: An extremely fast PHP extension for JSON In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311148.jBVBmXkG003558@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-json: An extremely fast PHP extension for JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176591 ivazquez at ivazquez.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-31 06:48 EST ------- Built on FC4 and devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 12:07:45 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 07:07:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176733] Review Request: php-pear-DB (PEAR database abstraction layer) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311207.jBVC7jvR004795@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB (PEAR database abstraction layer) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176733 ------- Additional Comments From ivazquez at ivazquez.net 2005-12-31 07:07 EST ------- - Use "%define peardir %(pear config-get php_dir 2> /dev/null || echo %{_datadir}/pear)" and BR php-pear instead of hardcoding %peardir - Drop Source1 - Wipe %{buildroot} at the beginning of %install, not of %prep - Do NOT use / in %files; be more explicit (In reply to comment #0) > 3. As a new FE contributor, I've been a bit confused about the whole license-file-in-package debate. Upstream (by convention AFAICT) does not seem to explicitly include license files in any PEAR packages. In this package I have manually brought in the license file. I'd rather not do this if I can avoid it; do I have to? You do not have to bring in the license from an external source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 12:20:02 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 07:20:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176733] Review Request: php-pear-DB (PEAR database abstraction layer) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311220.jBVCK2Ka005300@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB (PEAR database abstraction layer) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176733 ------- Additional Comments From jorton at redhat.com 2005-12-31 07:19 EST ------- Thanks for the submission Tim. Other than Ignacio's comments this looks fine; I'd also trim down the %description a bit to something more succinct. We should probably have php-pear own /var/lib/pear too (note to self... :). I think that Extras is the appropriate place for PEAR modules to be packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 12:34:41 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 07:34:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174240] Review Request: artwiz-aleczapka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311234.jBVCYfCS006190@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: artwiz-aleczapka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174240 ------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2005-12-31 07:34 EST ------- > Merry Christmas and Happy New Year :) Same to you :-) > Sorry xmas was a little bit long this year I wish it was a bit longer ;) > here is a version with you patch applied and with the documentation > included... Can you check the server? I cannot connect to it: "The connection was refused when attempting to contact fedora.lowlatency.de." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 13:20:47 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:20:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171526] Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311320.jBVDKlD4007971@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171526 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2005-12-31 08:20 EST ------- Sorry Andreas, I will go over this bugs comments top see if there is anything major that need to be done, then make a final check against the FC checklist, and if it's all OK by then I will simply accept it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 13:24:36 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:24:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176733] Review Request: php-pear-DB (PEAR database abstraction layer) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311324.jBVDOa5Q008469@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-DB (PEAR database abstraction layer) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176733 ------- Additional Comments From bugs at timj.co.uk 2005-12-31 08:24 EST ------- OK, thanks for the comments, all good! I've taken them all on board and done a few cleanups of my own, and here goes with a new version: Spec URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/specs/php-pear-DB.spec SRPM URL: http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/srpms/php-pear-DB-1.7.6-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 13:27:37 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:27:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174240] Review Request: artwiz-aleczapka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311327.jBVDRbPo008597@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: artwiz-aleczapka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174240 ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-31 08:27 EST ------- Hm apache crashed ... damn debian ;) Should work now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 13:32:03 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:32:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171526] Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311332.jBVDW3xP008853@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171526 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2005-12-31 08:31 EST ------- So the following things seem fixed: * Naming and epoching issues resolved. * Subpackaging naming conventions have a rough consensus and noone is complaining about it anymore. * All build requirements are in place. I proceed to check against the baseline criteria. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From fedora at camperquake.de Sat Dec 31 13:55:40 2005 From: fedora at camperquake.de (Ralf Ertzinger) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:55:40 +0100 Subject: *-debuginfo Requires Message-ID: <20051231135540.GA23054@ryoko.camperquake.de> Hi. I noticed today that (at least in Extras) -debuginfo does not Require to be installed. Is there a usecase for that? From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 13:58:51 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 08:58:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174529] Review Request: clearsilver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311358.jBVDwpYk011023@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clearsilver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174529 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2005-12-31 08:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > I added --disable-ruby. > [snip] > > Maybe just disable java? I am now thinking about just building with --disable-ruby and --disable-java in order to at least have the package build on 64-bit also. It's not the most elegant solution, but something is better than nothing. I suspect that the majority of folks who would want this package is because Trac ( #174546) depends on it. Any comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 14:31:46 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:31:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171526] Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311431.jBVEVk68012098@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171526 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2005-12-31 09:31 EST ------- Does the fact that we're using the 32bit packages for the 64bit architectures mean that the package must have an ExcludeArch:-tag for the 64bit architectures? This need to be resolved... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 14:40:23 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:40:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174240] Review Request: artwiz-aleczapka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311440.jBVEeNMq012420@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: artwiz-aleczapka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174240 gajownik at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From gajownik at gmail.com 2005-12-31 09:40 EST ------- You gave link to the old srpm. The correct one is http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-3.src.rpm ;) - there is one rpmlint warning: [rpm-build at X ~]$ cd rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/ [rpm-build at X noarch]$ rpmlint artwiz-aleczapka-fonts-1.3-3.noarch.rpm W: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts no-version-in-last-changelog [rpm-build at X noarch]$ but it's not true ;-) - sources matches upstream - license: GPL APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 14:46:59 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:46:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174529] Review Request: clearsilver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311446.jBVEkxp4012866@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clearsilver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174529 ------- Additional Comments From symbiont at berlios.de 2005-12-31 09:46 EST ------- Use ifarch. If there happens to be a cross-section between a ruby OR java AND x86_64 AND clearsilver user, then they can push upstream to get ruby or java to work. In the meantime, it works on x86. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 15:05:18 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:05:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174240] Review Request: artwiz-aleczapka In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311505.jBVF5Itf013525@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: artwiz-aleczapka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174240 andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de 2005-12-31 10:05 EST ------- Thanks for the review :) imported and build for devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 15:50:21 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:50:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 174529] Review Request: clearsilver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311550.jBVFoLmh016178@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clearsilver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174529 ------- Additional Comments From fedora at soeterbroek.com 2005-12-31 10:50 EST ------- Rebuild for clearsilver 0.10.2-2: Using ifarch to disable building java and ruby sub-packages on x86_64. Spec Name or Url: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/clearsilver/clearsilver.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.soeterbroek.com/linux/fedora/extras/clearsilver/clearsilver-0.10.2-2.src.rpm Please, someone verify this RPM builds correctly on FC4/x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 17:05:35 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:05:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176741] New: Review Request: geos (Geometry Engine - Open Source) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176741 Summary: Review Request: geos (Geometry Engine - Open Source) Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: gdk at redhat.com ReportedBy: mccann0011 at hotmail.com QAContact: dkl at redhat.com CC: fedora-extras-list at redhat.com Spec Name or Url: http://www.canasoft.ca/fedora/geos.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.canasoft.ca/fedora/geos-2.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: GEOS (Geometry Engine - Open Source) is a C++ port of the Java Topology Suite (JTS). As such, it aims to contain the complete functionality of JTS in C++. This includes all the OpenGIS "Simple Features for SQL" spatial predicate functions and spatial operators, as well as specific JTS topology functions such as IsValid() rpmlint output: $ rpmlint geos-2.2.1-1.i386.rpm E: geos zero-length /usr/share/doc/geos-2.2.1/ChangeLog W: geos devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/geos-config $ rpmlint geos-devel-2.2.1-1.i386.rpm W: geos-devel no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From fedora-extras at adslpipe.co.uk Sat Dec 31 17:38:00 2005 From: fedora-extras at adslpipe.co.uk (Andy Burns) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 17:38:00 +0000 Subject: Wine c.f. Mono Message-ID: <43B6C1F8.6050106@adslpipe.co.uk> I know the the question "Why no Mono in Fedora?" has been asked/answered/argued to death, I'm not trying to re-ignite that again. Given that Mono is not allowed into Fedora (because it implements ECMA standards 334/335 for C#/CLR which may infringe Microsoft patents) why is it that Wine (which implements ECMA standard 234 for Win16 API and may also infringe Microsoft patents) is being considered for inclusion into Fedora Extras? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171526 Searching uspto.gov for assignee=Microsoft and abstract=API provides many possible patents that Wine could infringe, though as pointed out in section 6 of http://www.kegel.com/remedy/remedy2.html nothing has forced Microsoft to reveal which of those may protect Windows. Is it largely a question of how far "behind the curve" Wine is perceived to be compared to how close to "snapping at the heels" Mono is seen? From bugs.michael at gmx.net Sat Dec 31 17:41:15 2005 From: bugs.michael at gmx.net (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 18:41:15 +0100 Subject: *-debuginfo Requires In-Reply-To: <20051231135540.GA23054@ryoko.camperquake.de> References: <20051231135540.GA23054@ryoko.camperquake.de> Message-ID: <20051231184115.3fc8bce4.bugs.michael@gmx.net> On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:55:40 +0100, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > Hi. > > I noticed today that (at least in Extras) -debuginfo does not > Require to be installed. Is there a usecase for that? That dependency would not be complete either, since package %{name}-debuginfo may contain debug information for all sub-packages, too. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 18:10:33 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:10:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176741] Review Request: geos (Geometry Engine - Open Source) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311810.jBVIAXfZ023054@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geos (Geometry Engine - Open Source) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176741 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-31 13:10 EST ------- May-be you want to resume PR 171039 and take the lead on this? Seems like the OP of #171039 has lost interest on getting geos into FE. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 171039 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 18:10:50 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:10:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171039] Review Request: geos In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311810.jBVIAo4r023084@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geos https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171039 rc040203 at freenet.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mccann0011 at hotmail.com ------- Additional Comments From rc040203 at freenet.de 2005-12-31 13:10 EST ------- *** Bug 176741 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 19:34:24 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:34:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 175844] Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512311934.jBVJYOvH026975@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wmx -- really simple and basic X window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175844 ------- Additional Comments From somlo at cmu.edu 2005-12-31 14:34 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/wmx.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/wmx-6pl1-7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. From rdieter at math.unl.edu Sat Dec 31 21:00:10 2005 From: rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:00:10 -0600 Subject: *-debuginfo Requires In-Reply-To: <20051231184115.3fc8bce4.bugs.michael@gmx.net> References: <20051231135540.GA23054@ryoko.camperquake.de> <20051231184115.3fc8bce4.bugs.michael@gmx.net> Message-ID: Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:55:40 +0100, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: >>I noticed today that (at least in Extras) -debuginfo does not >>Require to be installed. Is there a usecase for that? > That dependency would not be complete either, since package > %{name}-debuginfo may contain debug information for all sub-packages, too. At least having the base pkg installed is better than none at all. -- Rex From triad at df.lth.se Sat Dec 31 23:40:59 2005 From: triad at df.lth.se (Linus Walleij) Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 00:40:59 +0100 (CET) Subject: Wine c.f. Mono In-Reply-To: <43B6C1F8.6050106@adslpipe.co.uk> References: <43B6C1F8.6050106@adslpipe.co.uk> Message-ID: On Sat, 31 Dec 2005, Andy Burns wrote: > Is it largely a question of how far "behind the curve" Wine is perceived to > be compared to how close to "snapping at the heels" Mono is seen? No. AFAIK there is no clear rationale at all unless it someday comes out of the Red Hat legal dept. The most common answer that I believe other distributions will give, is that Microsoft is in a very bad position to run lawsuits that threaten to harm interoperability (double so in the EU), so both Mono and Wine are quite safe. However two heavyweight law pillars (antitrust vs IP-law) colliding means the outcome is uncertain at best. You can never plan against patent infringement anyway, so it might be best to simply include them and wait for the call, if it ever comes. IP law is not a field of philosophical absolutes, though one wish it would be. We are presumably already shipping thousands of patented routines with the packages in Fedora, though it is highly uncertain if any of them would stand up in court. Torvalds said he simply outright ignores patents so even the kernel may contain a fair number of patented things. Linus From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 31 23:48:09 2005 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 18:48:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171526] Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <200512312348.jBVNm9l0006701@www.beta.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wine - A Windows 16/32 bit emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171526 ------- Additional Comments From triad at df.lth.se 2005-12-31 18:47 EST ------- Here is another problem: %dir %{_datadir}/fonts/wine need to be added so wine owns the %{_datadir}/fonts/wine/ directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.