[Bug 176096] Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176096





------- Additional Comments From mpeters at mac.com  2005-12-22 00:46 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)

> 
> But that will fail to register the gentium directory in
> %{_datadir}/fonts/fonts.cache-1, won't it?

It doesn't seem to be an issue anymore, but it doesn't specifically need to be
registered in %{_datadir}/fonts/fonts.cache-{1,2} in order for the fonts to work.

However - I just tested your package, and fc-cache on devel does in fact create
the proper file in devel branch now when used on a parent directory - so the
spec file is fine.

> 
> > 3) I personally would get rid of
> > 
> > %define fontdir         %{_datadir}/fonts/gentium
> > 
> > Just use %{_datadir}/fonts/gentium
> 
> I prefer to stay with it, to minimize possible mistakes when in a later version
> one mistakenly writes "genitum".

That's fine.
I guess it's a matter of taste.

-=-
This package is listed as assigned and in FE-Review.
But it's assigned to default gdk

Is that a mistake?
-=-

We should request a bug with rpmlint to get the license added to rpmlint since I
would like to see othe SIL fonts with that license (when released) added to
extras as well.

I'll do that later tonight.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.