[Bug 173054] Review Request: wavpack - completely open audiocodec
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Dec 25 16:47:35 UTC 2005
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: wavpack - completely open audiocodec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173054
bugs.michael at gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net
------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net 2005-12-25 11:47 EST -------
* On the pedantic side:
It is commonly considered bad taste to mention the software name
in the Summary line. Keep the summary short and include relevant
keywords. That's enough. More details fit into the package description.
Probably also s/wavpack/WavPack/gi since that is how they
spell it online.
* pkgconfig template file wavpack.pc.in contains hardcoded libdir,
which most likely breaks on multilib platforms if installed like
that. Needs a patch which does libdir=@libdir@ instead of
libdir=${prefix}/lib and provided that libdir will be defined and
substituted by the used autotools framework.
* pkgconfig file Cflags line is questionable. Adding a standard path
for headers to the search list is dangerous. Also, are WavPack
API users expected to do #include <wavpack/wavpack.h> or
#include <wavpack.h>? In case of the latter, the pkgconfig file
is wrong.
Same for Libs line. -L${libdir} disturbes library location search list
because libwavpack.so is installed into a standard location.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list