[Bug 173054] Review Request: wavpack - completely open audiocodec

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Dec 25 16:47:35 UTC 2005


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: wavpack - completely open audiocodec


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173054


bugs.michael at gmx.net changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bugs.michael at gmx.net




------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael at gmx.net  2005-12-25 11:47 EST -------
* On the pedantic side:
  It is commonly considered bad taste to mention the software name
  in the Summary line. Keep the summary short and include relevant
  keywords. That's enough. More details fit into the package description.

  Probably also  s/wavpack/WavPack/gi  since that is how they
  spell it online.

* pkgconfig template file wavpack.pc.in contains hardcoded libdir,
  which most likely breaks on multilib platforms if installed like
  that. Needs a patch which does  libdir=@libdir@  instead of 
  libdir=${prefix}/lib  and provided that libdir will be defined and
  substituted by the used autotools framework.

* pkgconfig file Cflags line is questionable. Adding a standard path
  for headers to the search list is dangerous. Also, are WavPack
  API users expected to do #include <wavpack/wavpack.h> or
  #include <wavpack.h>? In case of the latter, the pkgconfig file
  is wrong.

  Same for Libs line. -L${libdir} disturbes library location search list
  because libwavpack.so is installed into a standard location.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list